{"id":342490,"date":"2025-02-28T10:00:10","date_gmt":"2025-02-28T04:30:10","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=342490"},"modified":"2025-03-04T17:03:06","modified_gmt":"2025-03-04T11:33:06","slug":"allahabad-hc-decision-disregarding-pmla-rules-2016-stay-order-sc-legal-news","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/28\/allahabad-hc-decision-disregarding-pmla-rules-2016-stay-order-sc-legal-news\/","title":{"rendered":"SC puts stay on Allahabad HC decision directing PMLA Special Court to consider claim in alleged disregard of Rule 3A PMLA Rules, 2016"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Supreme Court:<\/span> While considering a challenge to the interim order of Allahabad High Court in <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Prakash Chandra Tiwari v. Union of India<\/span><a id=\"fnref1\" href=\"#fn1\" title=\"1. Criminal Misc. Writ Petition No. 20172 of 2023\"><sup>1<\/sup><\/a> for alleged disregard of Rule 3A of the Prevention of Money Laundering (Restoration of Property) Rules, 2016; the Division Bench of M.M. Sundresh and Rajesh Bindal, JJ., put a stay on the impugned decision of the High Court.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The petitioner is the director of Shine City Infra Project Pvt. Ltd, which is prominently involved in the real estate sector. The Company was managed by the Petitioner herein along with the co-director. In May 2019, the co-director attended a business workshop in Nepal, wherein he was detained along with the other individuals by the authorities, on account of certain pending cases against one of the individuals.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Following the registration of multiple FIRs, Directorate of Enforcement Lucknow Zonal Office (ED), initiated proceedings under the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002801311\" target=\"_blank\">Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002<\/a> against the petitioner, alleging the involvement of proceeds of crime under sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561745\" target=\"_blank\">409<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561758\" target=\"_blank\">420<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561809\" target=\"_blank\">467<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561810\" target=\"_blank\">468<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561814\" target=\"_blank\">471<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561375\" target=\"_blank\">120-B<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\">Penal Code, 1860<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The counsels for the petitioner alleged that the ED initiated the proceedings without application of mind. The petitioner further alleged that the High Court in <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Prakash Chandra Tiwari (supra)<\/span>, erroneously passed an order directing the Special Court to consider the claim of the complainant as per the Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001534503\" target=\"_blank\">8(8)<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002801311\" target=\"_blank\">Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002<\/a> (&#8220;PMLA&#8221;) in complete disregard of Rule 3A of the Prevention of Money Laundering (Restoration of Property) Rules, 2016, within a period of five months from the date of the production of the certified copy of the order along with the claim. The Petitioner further contended that the second proviso to the Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001534503\" target=\"_blank\">8(8)<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002801311\" target=\"_blank\">PMLA, 2002<\/a>, is in contravention with the settled law provided under the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002801311\" target=\"_blank\">PMLA, 2002<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p><!--\n\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Asif Naseem v. Union of India, Special Leave Petition (Criminal) Diary No(s). 5578\/2025, decided on 24-2-2025<\/span>]<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n<hr\/>\n\n\n\n\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For Petitioner(s):<\/span> Mr. Ashish Deep Verma, Adv. Mr. Syed Mehdi Imam, AOR Ms. Kamya Ritu Varma, Adv. Mr. Harsh Kumar Singh, Adv. Ms. Apali Kaushal, Adv. Mr. Mir Adnan Zahoor, Adv. Ms. Pragati Dhawan, Adv. Ms. Shrishti Ramchandani, Adv.<\/p>\n\n--><\/p>\n<div style=\"text-overflow: ellipsis; background-color: #92A8D1; text-align:justify; clear:both; text-size-adjust: auto; overflow: auto;\">\n<p style=\"font-size: 18pt; margin-top: 5px; text-align: center;\">CASE DETAILS<\/p>\n<table width=\"100%\" style=\"word-wrap: break-word; border-collapse:collapse; table-layout: fixed; margin-top: 10px;\">\n<colgroup>\n<col width=\"41%\"\/>\n<col width=\"59%\"\/>\n<\/colgroup>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td valign=\"top\">\n<p><span style=\"color: #D4E4F7; font-weight: bold;\">Citation:<\/span><br \/><span style=\"color: #D4E4F7; font-size: 10pt;\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/86k8d6rL\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2025 SCC OnLine SC 470<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #D4E4F7; font-weight: bold;\">Appellants&#160;:<\/span><br \/> Asif Naseem<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #D4E4F7; font-weight: bold;\">Respondents&#160;:<\/span><br \/> Union of India<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td valign=\"top\">\n<p style=\"color: #D4E4F7; font-weight: bold;\">Advocates who appeared in this case<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #D4E4F7; font-weight: bold;\">For Petitioner(s):<\/span><br \/> Mr. Ashish Deep Verma, Adv. Mr. Syed Mehdi Imam, AOR Ms. Kamya Ritu Varma, Adv. Mr. Harsh Kumar Singh, Adv. Ms. Apali Kaushal, Adv. Mr. Mir Adnan Zahoor, Adv. Ms. Pragati Dhawan, Adv. Ms. Shrishti Ramchandani, Adv.<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #D4E4F7; font-weight: bold;\">For Respondent(s):<\/span> <\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p style=\"font-size: 12pt; margin-top: -20px; margin-left: 5px;\"><span style=\"color: #D4E4F7; font-weight: bold;\">CORAM&#160;:<\/span><\/p>\n<div id=\"banner\" style=\"overflow: hidden; display: flex; justify-content: space-between; padding-left: 3%;\">\n<div class=\"\" style=\"max-width: 100%; max-height: 100%; font-size: 9pt; text-align: center;\">\n<p><a><img decoding=\"async\" height=\"100px\" width=\"100px\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scobserver.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/31-Sundaresh-modified.png\" alt=\"M.M. Sundresh, J.\" style=\"border-radius: 50%;\"><br \/><span style=\"color: black !important;\">M.M. Sundresh, J.<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"\" style=\"max-width: 100%; max-height: 100%; font-size: 9pt; text-align: center;\">\n<p><a><img decoding=\"async\" height=\"100px\" width=\"100px\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scobserver.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/Rajesh-Bindal-Crop-1.jpg\" alt=\"Rajesh Bindal, J.\" style=\"border-radius: 50%;\"><br \/><span style=\"color: black !important;\">Rajesh Bindal, J.<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"\" style=\"max-width: 100%; max-height: 100%; font-size: 9pt; text-align: center;\">\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"\" style=\"max-width: 100%; max-height: 100%;\"><\/div>\n<div class=\"\" style=\"max-width: 100%; max-height: 100%;\"><\/div>\n<div class=\"\" style=\"max-width: 100%; max-height: 100%;\"><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Penal Code, 1860 &nbsp; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1158\" target=\"_blank\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1158\" target=\"_blank\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"penal code, 1860\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294601\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-768x511.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-440x293.jpg 440w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-650x433.jpg 650w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860.jpg 886w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-60x40.jpg 60w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<hr\/>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn1\" href=\"#fnref1\">1.<\/a> Criminal Misc. Writ Petition No. 20172 of 2023<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">The Petitioner further contended that the second proviso to the Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001534503\" target=\"_blank\">8(8)<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002801311\" target=\"_blank\">PMLA, 2002<\/a>, is in contravention with the settled law provided under the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002801311\" target=\"_blank\">PMLA, 2002<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":342493,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,9],"tags":[79174,37261,35267,19261,34084,26784,43813],"class_list":["post-342490","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-supremecourt","tag-allahabad-hc-pmla-rules-2016","tag-ed","tag-enforcement-directorate","tag-money-laundering","tag-pmla","tag-proceeds-of-crime","tag-stay-order"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>SC puts stay on Allahabad HC decision allegedly disregarding Rule 3A PMLA Rules, 2016<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"The Petitioner further contended that the second proviso to the Section 8(8) of PMLA, 2002, is in contravention with the settled law provided under the PMLA, 2002.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/28\/allahabad-hc-decision-disregarding-pmla-rules-2016-stay-order-sc-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"SC puts stay on Allahabad HC decision directing PMLA Special Court to consider claim in alleged disregard of Rule 3A PMLA Rules, 2016\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The Petitioner further contended that the second proviso to the Section 8(8) of PMLA, 2002, is in contravention with the settled law provided under the PMLA, 2002.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/28\/allahabad-hc-decision-disregarding-pmla-rules-2016-stay-order-sc-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-02-28T04:30:10+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-03-04T11:33:06+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/Rule-3A-PMLA-Rules-2016.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"SC puts stay on Allahabad HC decision directing PMLA Special Court to consider claim in alleged disregard of Rule 3A PMLA Rules, 2016\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/28\/allahabad-hc-decision-disregarding-pmla-rules-2016-stay-order-sc-legal-news\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/28\/allahabad-hc-decision-disregarding-pmla-rules-2016-stay-order-sc-legal-news\/\",\"name\":\"SC puts stay on Allahabad HC decision allegedly disregarding Rule 3A PMLA Rules, 2016\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/28\/allahabad-hc-decision-disregarding-pmla-rules-2016-stay-order-sc-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/28\/allahabad-hc-decision-disregarding-pmla-rules-2016-stay-order-sc-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/Rule-3A-PMLA-Rules-2016.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-02-28T04:30:10+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-03-04T11:33:06+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\"},\"description\":\"The Petitioner further contended that the second proviso to the Section 8(8) of PMLA, 2002, is in contravention with the settled law provided under the PMLA, 2002.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/28\/allahabad-hc-decision-disregarding-pmla-rules-2016-stay-order-sc-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/28\/allahabad-hc-decision-disregarding-pmla-rules-2016-stay-order-sc-legal-news\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/28\/allahabad-hc-decision-disregarding-pmla-rules-2016-stay-order-sc-legal-news\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/Rule-3A-PMLA-Rules-2016.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/Rule-3A-PMLA-Rules-2016.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"Rule 3A PMLA Rules 2016\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/28\/allahabad-hc-decision-disregarding-pmla-rules-2016-stay-order-sc-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"SC puts stay on Allahabad HC decision directing PMLA Special Court to consider claim in alleged disregard of Rule 3A PMLA Rules, 2016\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\",\"name\":\"Sucheta\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Sucheta\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"SC puts stay on Allahabad HC decision allegedly disregarding Rule 3A PMLA Rules, 2016","description":"The Petitioner further contended that the second proviso to the Section 8(8) of PMLA, 2002, is in contravention with the settled law provided under the PMLA, 2002.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/28\/allahabad-hc-decision-disregarding-pmla-rules-2016-stay-order-sc-legal-news\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"SC puts stay on Allahabad HC decision directing PMLA Special Court to consider claim in alleged disregard of Rule 3A PMLA Rules, 2016","og_description":"The Petitioner further contended that the second proviso to the Section 8(8) of PMLA, 2002, is in contravention with the settled law provided under the PMLA, 2002.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/28\/allahabad-hc-decision-disregarding-pmla-rules-2016-stay-order-sc-legal-news\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2025-02-28T04:30:10+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-03-04T11:33:06+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/Rule-3A-PMLA-Rules-2016.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Sucheta","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"SC puts stay on Allahabad HC decision directing PMLA Special Court to consider claim in alleged disregard of Rule 3A PMLA Rules, 2016","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Sucheta","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/28\/allahabad-hc-decision-disregarding-pmla-rules-2016-stay-order-sc-legal-news\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/28\/allahabad-hc-decision-disregarding-pmla-rules-2016-stay-order-sc-legal-news\/","name":"SC puts stay on Allahabad HC decision allegedly disregarding Rule 3A PMLA Rules, 2016","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/28\/allahabad-hc-decision-disregarding-pmla-rules-2016-stay-order-sc-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/28\/allahabad-hc-decision-disregarding-pmla-rules-2016-stay-order-sc-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/Rule-3A-PMLA-Rules-2016.webp","datePublished":"2025-02-28T04:30:10+00:00","dateModified":"2025-03-04T11:33:06+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa"},"description":"The Petitioner further contended that the second proviso to the Section 8(8) of PMLA, 2002, is in contravention with the settled law provided under the PMLA, 2002.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/28\/allahabad-hc-decision-disregarding-pmla-rules-2016-stay-order-sc-legal-news\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/28\/allahabad-hc-decision-disregarding-pmla-rules-2016-stay-order-sc-legal-news\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/28\/allahabad-hc-decision-disregarding-pmla-rules-2016-stay-order-sc-legal-news\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/Rule-3A-PMLA-Rules-2016.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/Rule-3A-PMLA-Rules-2016.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"Rule 3A PMLA Rules 2016"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/28\/allahabad-hc-decision-disregarding-pmla-rules-2016-stay-order-sc-legal-news\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"SC puts stay on Allahabad HC decision directing PMLA Special Court to consider claim in alleged disregard of Rule 3A PMLA Rules, 2016"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa","name":"Sucheta","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Sucheta"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/Rule-3A-PMLA-Rules-2016.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":265743,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/22\/for-money-launderers-jail-is-the-rule-and-bail-is-an-exception-allahabad-high-court-pmla\/","url_meta":{"origin":342490,"position":0},"title":"For money launderers \u201cjail is the rule and bail is an exception\u201d: All HC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"April 22, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court: While addressing a matter with regard to anticipatory bail, Krishan Pahal, J., observed that, Money Laundering being an offence is economic threat to national interest and is committed by the white-collar offenders who are deeply rooted in society and cannot be traced out easily. An anticipatory bail\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/All-HC-Lko-Bench_4.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/All-HC-Lko-Bench_4.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/All-HC-Lko-Bench_4.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/All-HC-Lko-Bench_4.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/All-HC-Lko-Bench_4.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":311805,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/19\/delhi-hc-quashes-charges-under-pmla-against-doctor-accused-in-illegal-kidney-transplantation-racket-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":342490,"position":1},"title":"Delhi High Court quashes charges under Prevention of Money Laundering Act against doctor accused of being involved in illegal kidney transplantation racket","author":"Arushi","date":"January 19, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cIt was also alleged that illegal kidney transplantation was the only occupation of the petitioner, and his entire earnings were from this source only.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":285722,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/28\/trial-court-has-taken-custody-of-accused-without-following-the-settled-proposition-of-law-allahabad-high-court-grants-bail-to-accused-in-pmla-case-legal-research-legal-news-updat\/","url_meta":{"origin":342490,"position":2},"title":"&#8216;Trial Court has taken custody of accused without following the settled proposition of law&#8217;; Allahabad High Court grants bail to accused in PMLA case","author":"Apoorva","date":"February 28, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court said that there was no requirement to take the accused into custody when he appeared before the Trial Court and cooperated in the investigation throughout, and the Investi gating Agency has never thought to arrest him under Section 19 of the PMLA","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Allahabad High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-476.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-476.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-476.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-476.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":280382,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/26\/allahabad-high-court-grants-bail-to-journalist-siddique-kappan-in-pmla-case-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":342490,"position":3},"title":"Allahabad High Court grants bail to journalist Siddique Kappan in PMLA case","author":"Editor","date":"December 26, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court said that even if it is believed that part of proceeds of crime was transferred in the bank account of Atikur Rahman, that itself may not be sufficient to prove that Siddique Kappan has dealt with the proceeds of crime which had been allegedly received by K.A.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Allahabad High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image31.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":329039,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/21\/commission-of-scheduled-offence-is-a-prerequisite-for-prosecuting-an-offence-under-prevention-of-money-laundering-act-jk-high-court-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":342490,"position":4},"title":"Commission of scheduled offence is a prerequisite for prosecuting an offence under Prevention of Money Laundering Act: J&amp;K High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"August 21, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court quashed the complaint, charge sheet, and charges framed by the Designated Special Court, Srinagar, under the PMLA.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jammu-and-Kashmir-and-Ladakh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jammu-and-Kashmir-and-Ladakh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jammu-and-Kashmir-and-Ladakh-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jammu-and-Kashmir-and-Ladakh-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":317239,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/16\/on-procedure-and-propriety-travails-of-an-innocent-purchaser-of-tainted-property-under-the-pmla-framework\/","url_meta":{"origin":342490,"position":5},"title":"On Procedure and Propriety: Travails of an Innocent Purchaser of Tainted Property under the PMLA Framework","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"March 16, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"by Onkar Thakur\u2020, Nalin Jha\u2020\u2020 and Saksham Chaturvedi\u2020\u2020\u2020","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Op Eds&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Innocent Purchaser of Tainted Property","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Innocent-Purchaser-of-Tainted-Property.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Innocent-Purchaser-of-Tainted-Property.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Innocent-Purchaser-of-Tainted-Property.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Innocent-Purchaser-of-Tainted-Property.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/342490","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=342490"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/342490\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/342493"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=342490"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=342490"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=342490"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}