{"id":342335,"date":"2025-02-26T11:30:51","date_gmt":"2025-02-26T06:00:51","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=342335"},"modified":"2025-03-01T16:46:00","modified_gmt":"2025-03-01T11:16:00","slug":"delhi-hc-grants-ex-parte-ad-interim-injunction-against-unauthorised-use-online-gaming-baazi-group-trade-mark-baazi","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/26\/delhi-hc-grants-ex-parte-ad-interim-injunction-against-unauthorised-use-online-gaming-baazi-group-trade-mark-baazi\/","title":{"rendered":"Delhi High Court grants ad-interim injunction against unauthorised use of Baazi Games\u2019 trade mark \u2018BAAZI\u2019"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Delhi High Court:<\/span> In an application filed under Order <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001523435\" target=\"_blank\">39 Rule 1<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001523437\" target=\"_blank\">2<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726944\" target=\"_blank\">Code of Civil Procedure, 1908<\/a> (&#8216;CPC&#8217;), seeking a perpetual and mandatory injunction against the infringement of the well-known trade mark &#8216;BAAZI&#8217; of the plaintiff- Moonshine Technology Private Limited (&#8216;Moonshine&#8217;), a Single Judge Bench of Mini Pushkarna, J., granted ex-parte ad-interim injunction in the favour of Moonshine and against the unidentified defendants. The Court restrained the defendants from accessing, using, modifying, alienating, dispositioning, or transferring the domain names in question.<\/p>\n<h3>Background<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Moonshine is the parent company of the Baazi Group of Companies, which offers gaming products and experiences under the branding and trademarks inter alia &#8216;BAAZI&#8217;, &#8216;BAAZI GAMES&#8217;, &#8216;BAAZI MOBILE GAMING&#8217;, &#8216;POKERBAAZI&#8217;, &#8216;BALLEBAAZI&#8217;, &#8216;SPORTSBAAZI&#8217;, &#8216;RUMMYBAAZI&#8217;, &#8216;CARDBAAZI&#8217;, and the label marks viz.<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/13_Moonshine-Technology-Private-Limited-v.-Ashok-Kumar-1.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"150\" height=\"40\"\/> <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/13_Moonshine-Technology-Private-Limited-v.-Ashok-Kumar-2.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"100\" height=\"50\"\/> <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/13_Moonshine-Technology-Private-Limited-v.-Ashok-Kumar-3.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"100\" height=\"50\"\/> <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/13_Moonshine-Technology-Private-Limited-v.-Ashok-Kumar-2.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"100\" height=\"50\"\/> <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/13_Moonshine-Technology-Private-Limited-v.-Ashok-Kumar-1.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"150\" height=\"40\"\/> etc. It was contended that Moonshine was a leading online gaming business and was well-known and widely recognised under the brand and trademark &#8216;BAAZI&#8217;. The Court in <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Moonshine Technology (P) Ltd.<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Tictok Skill Games (P) Ltd.<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/3tpXxw47\" target=\"_blank\">2022 SCC OnLine Del 296<\/a> had recognised that &#8216;BAAZI&#8217; was a well-known trade mark of Moonshine.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">It was contended that there was a flagrant violation of Moonshine&#8217;s trade mark &#8216;BAAZI&#8217; by unauthorised domain registrants and rogue website owners. Besides committing cyber-squatting, the unidentifiable registrants were also employing bait-and-switch methods to redirect user traffic to their infringing and rogue websites or domains wherein they offered illegal gambling and betting services.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">These unauthorised users included Respondents 1 to 5, who were allegedly hosting illegal gambling and casino websites through and under the infringing domain name\/branding. They were also diverting Moonshine&#8217;s customers and internet users towards their websites with <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">mala fide<\/span> intent to indulge the said customers and users in illegal activities. Further, defendants 6 to 8 had registered and were managing various infringing domain names.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Aggrieved by such misuse of their trade mark, Moonshine filed the present suit and the application under Order <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001523435\" target=\"_blank\">39 Rules 1<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001523437\" target=\"_blank\">2<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726944\" target=\"_blank\">CPC<\/a>.<\/p>\n<h3>Analysis<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court stated that Moonshine had demonstrated a prima facie case for grant of injunction. The Court held that Moonshine would suffer an irreparable loss if an ex-parte ad-interim injunction was granted. Further, the balance of convenience was also in Moonshine&#8217;s favour and against the defendants.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Accordingly, the Court restrained defendants 1 to 5 from accessing, using, modifying, alienating, dispositioning, or transferring the specified domain names. Further, the Court directed defendants 6 to 8 to suspend the access and use of the specified domain names by their respective registrants and to disclose the details of the registrants of the infringing domain names by way of an affidavit within one week.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Moonshine Technology Private Limited v. Ashok Kumar, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/wN1W6OuN\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2025 SCC OnLine Del 1036<\/a>, decided on 14-02-2025<\/span>]<\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the plaintiff:<\/span> Senior Advocate Raj Shekhar Rao, Subhash Bhutoria, Anuja Negi, Ayesha Khan and Sanjana Bishnoi<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the defendant:<\/span> Aishwarya Kane and Gaurav Barathi<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">The Court held that Moonshine had demonstrated a prima facie case for a grant of injunction, the refusal of which would cause an irreparable loss to it.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":314886,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[41658,48492,79090,8221,2543,31976,30412,5881,69176,79088,44337,79089,62681,2616],"class_list":["post-342335","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-ad-interim-injunction","tag-baazi","tag-baazi-games","tag-betting","tag-Delhi_High_Court","tag-ex-parte","tag-gambling","tag-ipr","tag-justice-mini-pushkarna","tag-moonshine-technology","tag-online-gaming","tag-order-39-rule-1-and-2-cpc","tag-poker","tag-Trade_Mark"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Delhi HC grants injunction against unauthorised use of Baazi trade mark | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Delhi HC granted ex-parte ad-interim injunction against the unauthorised use of Online Gaming Company Baazi trade mark\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/26\/delhi-hc-grants-ex-parte-ad-interim-injunction-against-unauthorised-use-online-gaming-baazi-group-trade-mark-baazi\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Delhi High Court grants ad-interim injunction against unauthorised use of Baazi Games\u2019 trade mark \u2018BAAZI\u2019\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Delhi HC granted ex-parte ad-interim injunction against the unauthorised use of Online Gaming Company Baazi trade mark\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/26\/delhi-hc-grants-ex-parte-ad-interim-injunction-against-unauthorised-use-online-gaming-baazi-group-trade-mark-baazi\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-02-26T06:00:51+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-03-01T11:16:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"591\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Delhi High Court grants ad-interim injunction against unauthorised use of Baazi Games\u2019 trade mark \u2018BAAZI\u2019\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/26\/delhi-hc-grants-ex-parte-ad-interim-injunction-against-unauthorised-use-online-gaming-baazi-group-trade-mark-baazi\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/26\/delhi-hc-grants-ex-parte-ad-interim-injunction-against-unauthorised-use-online-gaming-baazi-group-trade-mark-baazi\/\",\"name\":\"Delhi HC grants injunction against unauthorised use of Baazi trade mark | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/26\/delhi-hc-grants-ex-parte-ad-interim-injunction-against-unauthorised-use-online-gaming-baazi-group-trade-mark-baazi\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/26\/delhi-hc-grants-ex-parte-ad-interim-injunction-against-unauthorised-use-online-gaming-baazi-group-trade-mark-baazi\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-02-26T06:00:51+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-03-01T11:16:00+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"Delhi HC granted ex-parte ad-interim injunction against the unauthorised use of Online Gaming Company Baazi trade mark\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/26\/delhi-hc-grants-ex-parte-ad-interim-injunction-against-unauthorised-use-online-gaming-baazi-group-trade-mark-baazi\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/26\/delhi-hc-grants-ex-parte-ad-interim-injunction-against-unauthorised-use-online-gaming-baazi-group-trade-mark-baazi\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/26\/delhi-hc-grants-ex-parte-ad-interim-injunction-against-unauthorised-use-online-gaming-baazi-group-trade-mark-baazi\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp\",\"width\":887,\"height\":591,\"caption\":\"Delhi High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/26\/delhi-hc-grants-ex-parte-ad-interim-injunction-against-unauthorised-use-online-gaming-baazi-group-trade-mark-baazi\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Delhi High Court grants ad-interim injunction against unauthorised use of Baazi Games\u2019 trade mark \u2018BAAZI\u2019\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Delhi HC grants injunction against unauthorised use of Baazi trade mark | SCC Times","description":"Delhi HC granted ex-parte ad-interim injunction against the unauthorised use of Online Gaming Company Baazi trade mark","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/26\/delhi-hc-grants-ex-parte-ad-interim-injunction-against-unauthorised-use-online-gaming-baazi-group-trade-mark-baazi\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Delhi High Court grants ad-interim injunction against unauthorised use of Baazi Games\u2019 trade mark \u2018BAAZI\u2019","og_description":"Delhi HC granted ex-parte ad-interim injunction against the unauthorised use of Online Gaming Company Baazi trade mark","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/26\/delhi-hc-grants-ex-parte-ad-interim-injunction-against-unauthorised-use-online-gaming-baazi-group-trade-mark-baazi\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2025-02-26T06:00:51+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-03-01T11:16:00+00:00","og_image":[{"width":887,"height":591,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Delhi High Court grants ad-interim injunction against unauthorised use of Baazi Games\u2019 trade mark \u2018BAAZI\u2019","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/26\/delhi-hc-grants-ex-parte-ad-interim-injunction-against-unauthorised-use-online-gaming-baazi-group-trade-mark-baazi\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/26\/delhi-hc-grants-ex-parte-ad-interim-injunction-against-unauthorised-use-online-gaming-baazi-group-trade-mark-baazi\/","name":"Delhi HC grants injunction against unauthorised use of Baazi trade mark | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/26\/delhi-hc-grants-ex-parte-ad-interim-injunction-against-unauthorised-use-online-gaming-baazi-group-trade-mark-baazi\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/26\/delhi-hc-grants-ex-parte-ad-interim-injunction-against-unauthorised-use-online-gaming-baazi-group-trade-mark-baazi\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp","datePublished":"2025-02-26T06:00:51+00:00","dateModified":"2025-03-01T11:16:00+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"Delhi HC granted ex-parte ad-interim injunction against the unauthorised use of Online Gaming Company Baazi trade mark","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/26\/delhi-hc-grants-ex-parte-ad-interim-injunction-against-unauthorised-use-online-gaming-baazi-group-trade-mark-baazi\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/26\/delhi-hc-grants-ex-parte-ad-interim-injunction-against-unauthorised-use-online-gaming-baazi-group-trade-mark-baazi\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/26\/delhi-hc-grants-ex-parte-ad-interim-injunction-against-unauthorised-use-online-gaming-baazi-group-trade-mark-baazi\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp","width":887,"height":591,"caption":"Delhi High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/26\/delhi-hc-grants-ex-parte-ad-interim-injunction-against-unauthorised-use-online-gaming-baazi-group-trade-mark-baazi\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Delhi High Court grants ad-interim injunction against unauthorised use of Baazi Games\u2019 trade mark \u2018BAAZI\u2019"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":260942,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/02\/01\/trademark-is-used-by-a-manufacturer-or-service-provider-to-distinguish-products-from-those-of-competitors\/","url_meta":{"origin":342335,"position":0},"title":"Baazi v. WinZo| Trademark is used by a manufacturer or service provider to distinguish products from those of competitors: Here&#8217;s how Winzo appeared dishonest and unfair in adopting Baazi","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"February 1, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: Explaining the significance of a trademark, Asha Menon, J., observed that, When people are satisfied with the products supplied by a manufacturer or service provider, they buy them on the basis of the trade mark and over time it becomes popular and well known. Thus, the use\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":6526,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/11\/04\/restraining-order-passed-in-loreal-trade-mark-infringement-case\/","url_meta":{"origin":342335,"position":1},"title":"Restraining order passed in Loreal trade mark infringement case","author":"Sucheta","date":"November 4, 2014","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: In a recent case a major international cosmetic brand, namely, Loreal had filed a suit for permanent injunction on account of trade mark infringement against the defendants who were selling counterfeit products in the name of the said brand, on their internet website www.shopclues.com. While recognising that\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;High Courts&quot;","block_context":{"text":"High Courts","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/highcourts\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":6211,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/11\/04\/restraining-order-passed-in-loreal-trade-mark-infringement-case-2\/","url_meta":{"origin":342335,"position":2},"title":"Restraining order passed in Loreal trade mark infringement case","author":"Sucheta","date":"November 4, 2014","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: In a recent case a major international cosmetic brand, namely, Loreal had filed a suit for permanent injunction on account of trade mark infringement against the defendants who were selling counterfeit products in the name of the said brand, on their internet website www.shopclues.com. While recognising that\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Intellectual Property&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Intellectual Property","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/intellectual_property\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":278667,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/21\/delhi-high-court-grants-ex-parte-ad-interim-injunction-to-american-eagle-against-ektarfa-garments-in-a-trademark-and-copyright-infringement-suit\/","url_meta":{"origin":342335,"position":3},"title":"Delhi High Court grants ex-parte ad-interim injunction to American Eagle against Ektarfa Garments in a trademark and copyright infringement suit","author":"Editor","date":"November 21, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Delhi High Court: In a case where application was filed under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 read with Section 51 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (Code) in a trademark and copyright infringement suit, the Single Judge Bench of Jyoti Singh, J. Passed an Order granting ex-parte\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":278074,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/26\/delhi-high-court-grants-ex-parte-ad-interim-injunction-to-tata-sia-airlines-limited-in-a-trade-mark-infringement-suit-restrains-vistara-media-private-limited-from-using-the-mark-vistara\/","url_meta":{"origin":342335,"position":4},"title":"Delhi High Court grants ex-parte ad-interim injunction to Tata Sia Airlines Limited in a trade mark infringement suit; restrains Vistara Media Private Limited from using the mark \u2018VISTARA\u2019","author":"Editor","date":"November 26, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Delhi High Court: In a case where Tata Sia Airlines Limited filed an application under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 of CPC for grant of an ex-parte ad-interim injunction, the Single Judge Bench of Jyoti Singh, J. passed an interim order restraining Vistara Media Private Limited from\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/Delhi-High-Court-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":337758,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/12\/23\/delhi-hc-grants-ex-parte-ad-interim-injunction-mankind-pharma-restrain-infringement-trade-mark\/","url_meta":{"origin":342335,"position":5},"title":"Delhi High Court grants ex-parte ad-interim injunction in favour of Mankind Pharma Ltd. to restrain infringement of trade mark","author":"Editor","date":"December 23, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"It was said that if no ex-parte ad-interim injunction is granted, Mankind Pharma would suffer an irreparable loss.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/342335","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=342335"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/342335\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/314886"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=342335"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=342335"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=342335"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}