{"id":342312,"date":"2025-02-26T09:00:29","date_gmt":"2025-02-26T03:30:29","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=342312"},"modified":"2025-03-01T16:40:15","modified_gmt":"2025-03-01T11:10:15","slug":"excess-use-power-by-customs-officers-on-complainant-to-extract-truth-be-construed-as-act-linked-to-their-official-duty-rajasthan-high-court-scc-times","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/26\/excess-use-power-by-customs-officers-on-complainant-to-extract-truth-be-construed-as-act-linked-to-their-official-duty-rajasthan-high-court-scc-times\/","title":{"rendered":"S. 197 CrPC | Excess use of power by Customs officers to \u2018extract truth\u2019 is an act done in discharge of official duty: Rajasthan High Court"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Rajasthan High Court:<\/span> In a criminal revision against trial court&#8217;s order framing charges against the custom officers (petitioners) without obtaining prior sanction under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519442\" target=\"_blank\">197<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726935\" target=\"_blank\">Criminal Procedure Code, 1973<\/a> (CrPC), a single-judge bench of Manoj Kumar Garg, J., quashed the trial court&#8217;s impugned order as it violates Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519442\" target=\"_blank\">197 CrPC<\/a> which requires prior government sanction for prosecution against public servants in relation to an act done in discharge of official duty, even if excessive force is used.<\/p>\n<h3>Factual Matrix<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In the instant matter, a written complaint was filed by complainant alleging that on 18-05-1988, while he was on leave, his residential house was raided by customs officers, but no objectionable material was found. Subsequently, on 03-06-1988, he was apprehended by two Inspectors of the Customs Department and taken to the customs office, where he was allegedly inflicted with injuries and threatened.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The police registered a case and initiated an investigation, which culminated in a negative Final Report. However, the complainant filed a protest petition, following which statements were recorded under Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519450\" target=\"_blank\">200<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519452\" target=\"_blank\">202 CrPC<\/a> and later the trial court took cognizance against the accused petitioners.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The petitioners filed an application under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519442\" target=\"_blank\">197 CrPC<\/a> and argued that as public servants, cognizance against them could not be taken without prior sanction from the appropriate government, however, the trial court, vide order dated 09-11-1994, dismissed the application. The trial court, vide order dated 23-11-2016, framed charges against the petitioners under Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561632\" target=\"_blank\">323<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561634\" target=\"_blank\">325<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561642\" target=\"_blank\">330<\/a>, and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561643\" target=\"_blank\">331<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\">IPC<\/a>, prompting the present criminal revision petition.<\/p>\n<h3>Moot Point<\/h3>\n<ol style=\"list-style-type: decimal;\">\n<li>\n<p>Whether the trial court erred in framing charges against the petitioners without obtaining prior sanction under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519442\" target=\"_blank\">197 CrPC<\/a>?<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Whether the alleged acts of the petitioners were committed in discharge of their official duties, thus entitling them to protection under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519442\" target=\"_blank\">197 CrPC<\/a>?<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<h3>Parties&#8217; Contentions<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The petitioners contended that Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519442\" target=\"_blank\">197 CrPC<\/a> provides absolute protection to public servants against prosecution for acts committed in the discharge of official duties unless sanctioned by the appropriate government. It was contended that the alleged offenses took place while interrogating the complainant in an official capacity. It was argued that the trial court misinterpreted Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519442\" target=\"_blank\">197 CrPC<\/a> and failed to consider its applicability at the stage of framing of charges.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">However, the respondents opposed the criminal revision petition and contended that offenses under Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519601\" target=\"_blank\">323<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519603\" target=\"_blank\">325<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519609\" target=\"_blank\">330<\/a>, and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519610\" target=\"_blank\">331<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\">IPC<\/a> are prima facie made out in the present case. It was argued that the alleged acts were not done in discharge of official duty and thus do not attract the protection of Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519442\" target=\"_blank\">197 CrPC<\/a>. It was further contended that the issue of sanction need not be considered at the charge-framing stage, where only the existence of a prima facie case is relevant.<\/p>\n<h3>Court&#8217;s Analysis<\/h3>\n<p>The Court noted that Section 197 of the CrPC requires prior sanction for prosecution of public servants and such sanction protects public servants from vexatious litigation for acts done in official capacity. The Court stated that the protection under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519442\" target=\"_blank\">197 CrPC<\/a> is available only if three conditions are fulfilled, i.e., the accused is<\/p>\n<ol style=\"list-style-type: lower-alpha;\">\n<li>\n<p>a public servant,<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p>has allegedly committed an offence,<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p>while acting or purporting or in connection to act in the discharge of his official duty.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold; margin-bottom: 3%;\">&#8220;Any action taken in good faith by the Government officer in discharging of duties or performing their duites in good faith and intended to be done in pursuance of the law then no suit, prosecution or any other legal proceeding shall lie against the State Government or any officer of the these Government or any other person exercising any powers of discharging such functions without prior prosecution sanction.&#8221;<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court referred to <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">State of H.P.<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">M.P. Gupta<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/3Iad972y\" target=\"_blank\">(2004) 2 SCC 349<\/a>, where the Supreme Court held that protection under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519442\" target=\"_blank\">197 CrPC<\/a> aims to &#8220;<span style=\"font-style: italic;\">protect responsible public servants against the institution of possibly vexatious criminal proceedings for offences alleged to have been committed by them while they are acting or purporting to act as public servants<\/span>&#8221; and <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Sankaran Moitra<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Sadhna Das<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/a415D0Jj\" target=\"_blank\">(2006) 4 SCC 584<\/a>, where the Supreme Court held that excess use of force during official duty does not automatically exclude the act from the purview of Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519442\" target=\"_blank\">197 CrPC<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court noted that in <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">State of Orissa<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Ganesh Chandra Jew<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/Ir0M0r1D\" target=\"_blank\">(2004) 8 SCC 40<\/a>, it was held that if an act is reasonably connected to official duty, Section 197 protection applies even if there is an excess of power; <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Om Prakash<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">State of Jharkhand<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/eB1tn62u\" target=\"_blank\">(2012) 12 SCC 72<\/a>, it was held that protection under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519442\" target=\"_blank\">197 CrPC<\/a> is available if the act is in the course of official duty, even if done in excess and <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">D.T. Virupakshappa<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">C. Subash<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/28iYU30t\" target=\"_blank\">AIR 2015 SC 2022<\/a>, it was held that if an alleged act has an essential connection to official duty, sanction under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519442\" target=\"_blank\">197 CrPC<\/a> is mandatory.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In the light of facts of the case, nature of the allegations and authorities cited, the Court stated that it appears that the petitioners&#8217; actions, although potentially exceeded their authority, were connected to their official duties. Thus, the Court held that such use of excess of power should not serve as a basis to deny the public servants the protection afforded by the statute unless sanction for prosecution is granted by the State under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519442\" target=\"_blank\">197 CrPC<\/a>. The Court held that the trial court&#8217;s order framing charges against the petitioners without sanction is legally untenable.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%; margin-left: 36pt; font-weight: bold;\">&#8220;the petitioners may have exceeded their powers by beating and torturing the complainant to extract the truth, this cannot be construed as an act entirely disconnected from their official duty. Even though the petitioners acted in excess of their duty, such actions were still within the broader context of their official responsibilities. This excess of power does not negate the protection granted under Section 197 of the Cr.P.C., as the offense remains connected to their official duties.<\/p>\n<h3>Court&#8217;s Decision<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court allowed the revision petition and quashed the trial court&#8217;s order framing charges against the petitioners for want of sanction under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519442\" target=\"_blank\">197 CrPC<\/a>. However, the Court stated that this does not prevent the complainant from initiating fresh proceedings after obtaining the requisite sanction.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Rakesh Mandola<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">State of Rajasthan<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/915MRO8x\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2025 SCC OnLine Raj 384<\/a>, Decided on 14-02-2025<\/span>]<\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">Mr. Nishant Bora, <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Counsel for the Petitioners<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">Mr. Hanuman Prajapati, PP and Mr. Abhishek Purohit, <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Counsel for the Respondents<\/span><\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 &nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1031\" target=\"_blank\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1031\" target=\"_blank\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"Code of Criminal Procedure\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294422\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-768x511.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-440x293.jpg 440w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-650x433.jpg 650w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure.jpg 886w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-60x40.jpg 60w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Penal Code, 1860 &nbsp; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1158\" target=\"_blank\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1158\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"penal code, 1860\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294601\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-768x511.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-440x293.jpg 440w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-650x433.jpg 650w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860.jpg 886w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-60x40.jpg 60w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">&#8220;Sanction of the Government, to prosecute a public officer, for any act related to the discharge of official duty, is imperative to protect the public officer from facing harassive, retaliatory, revengeful, and frivolous proceedings.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67514,"featured_media":314824,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[79082,29620,79080,79081,79078,19831,79077,56780,4131,79079,2575,20131,34362,79083],"class_list":["post-342312","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-abuse-of-authority","tag-criminal-revision-petition","tag-customs-officers","tag-excess-of-power","tag-excess-use-power-by-customs-officers","tag-framing-of-charges","tag-justice-manoj-kumar-garg","tag-legal-protection","tag-official-duty","tag-public-servant-protection","tag-Rajasthan_High_Court","tag-sanction-for-prosecution","tag-section-197-crpc","tag-vexatious-prosecution"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Excess use power by Customs officers on complainant to &#039;extract truth&#039; be construed as act linked to their official duty: Rajasthan High Court | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Rajasthan High Court held that excess use power by Customs officers on complainant to &#039;extract truth&#039; should be construed as act linked to their official duty.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/26\/excess-use-power-by-customs-officers-on-complainant-to-extract-truth-be-construed-as-act-linked-to-their-official-duty-rajasthan-high-court-scc-times\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"S. 197 CrPC | Excess use of power by Customs officers to \u2018extract truth\u2019 is an act done in discharge of official duty: Rajasthan High Court\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Rajasthan High Court held that excess use power by Customs officers on complainant to &#039;extract truth&#039; should be construed as act linked to their official duty.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/26\/excess-use-power-by-customs-officers-on-complainant-to-extract-truth-be-construed-as-act-linked-to-their-official-duty-rajasthan-high-court-scc-times\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-02-26T03:30:29+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-03-01T11:10:15+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"591\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"S. 197 CrPC | Excess use of power by Customs officers to \u2018extract truth\u2019 is an act done in discharge of official duty: Rajasthan High Court\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/26\/excess-use-power-by-customs-officers-on-complainant-to-extract-truth-be-construed-as-act-linked-to-their-official-duty-rajasthan-high-court-scc-times\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/26\/excess-use-power-by-customs-officers-on-complainant-to-extract-truth-be-construed-as-act-linked-to-their-official-duty-rajasthan-high-court-scc-times\/\",\"name\":\"Excess use power by Customs officers on complainant to 'extract truth' be construed as act linked to their official duty: Rajasthan High Court | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/26\/excess-use-power-by-customs-officers-on-complainant-to-extract-truth-be-construed-as-act-linked-to-their-official-duty-rajasthan-high-court-scc-times\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/26\/excess-use-power-by-customs-officers-on-complainant-to-extract-truth-be-construed-as-act-linked-to-their-official-duty-rajasthan-high-court-scc-times\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-02-26T03:30:29+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-03-01T11:10:15+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\"},\"description\":\"Rajasthan High Court held that excess use power by Customs officers on complainant to 'extract truth' should be construed as act linked to their official duty.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/26\/excess-use-power-by-customs-officers-on-complainant-to-extract-truth-be-construed-as-act-linked-to-their-official-duty-rajasthan-high-court-scc-times\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/26\/excess-use-power-by-customs-officers-on-complainant-to-extract-truth-be-construed-as-act-linked-to-their-official-duty-rajasthan-high-court-scc-times\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/26\/excess-use-power-by-customs-officers-on-complainant-to-extract-truth-be-construed-as-act-linked-to-their-official-duty-rajasthan-high-court-scc-times\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp\",\"width\":887,\"height\":591,\"caption\":\"Rajasthan High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/26\/excess-use-power-by-customs-officers-on-complainant-to-extract-truth-be-construed-as-act-linked-to-their-official-duty-rajasthan-high-court-scc-times\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"S. 197 CrPC | Excess use of power by Customs officers to \u2018extract truth\u2019 is an act done in discharge of official duty: Rajasthan High Court\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\",\"name\":\"Ritu\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Ritu\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_7\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Excess use power by Customs officers on complainant to 'extract truth' be construed as act linked to their official duty: Rajasthan High Court | SCC Times","description":"Rajasthan High Court held that excess use power by Customs officers on complainant to 'extract truth' should be construed as act linked to their official duty.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/26\/excess-use-power-by-customs-officers-on-complainant-to-extract-truth-be-construed-as-act-linked-to-their-official-duty-rajasthan-high-court-scc-times\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"S. 197 CrPC | Excess use of power by Customs officers to \u2018extract truth\u2019 is an act done in discharge of official duty: Rajasthan High Court","og_description":"Rajasthan High Court held that excess use power by Customs officers on complainant to 'extract truth' should be construed as act linked to their official duty.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/26\/excess-use-power-by-customs-officers-on-complainant-to-extract-truth-be-construed-as-act-linked-to-their-official-duty-rajasthan-high-court-scc-times\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2025-02-26T03:30:29+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-03-01T11:10:15+00:00","og_image":[{"width":887,"height":591,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Ritu","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"S. 197 CrPC | Excess use of power by Customs officers to \u2018extract truth\u2019 is an act done in discharge of official duty: Rajasthan High Court","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Ritu","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/26\/excess-use-power-by-customs-officers-on-complainant-to-extract-truth-be-construed-as-act-linked-to-their-official-duty-rajasthan-high-court-scc-times\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/26\/excess-use-power-by-customs-officers-on-complainant-to-extract-truth-be-construed-as-act-linked-to-their-official-duty-rajasthan-high-court-scc-times\/","name":"Excess use power by Customs officers on complainant to 'extract truth' be construed as act linked to their official duty: Rajasthan High Court | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/26\/excess-use-power-by-customs-officers-on-complainant-to-extract-truth-be-construed-as-act-linked-to-their-official-duty-rajasthan-high-court-scc-times\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/26\/excess-use-power-by-customs-officers-on-complainant-to-extract-truth-be-construed-as-act-linked-to-their-official-duty-rajasthan-high-court-scc-times\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp","datePublished":"2025-02-26T03:30:29+00:00","dateModified":"2025-03-01T11:10:15+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9"},"description":"Rajasthan High Court held that excess use power by Customs officers on complainant to 'extract truth' should be construed as act linked to their official duty.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/26\/excess-use-power-by-customs-officers-on-complainant-to-extract-truth-be-construed-as-act-linked-to-their-official-duty-rajasthan-high-court-scc-times\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/26\/excess-use-power-by-customs-officers-on-complainant-to-extract-truth-be-construed-as-act-linked-to-their-official-duty-rajasthan-high-court-scc-times\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/26\/excess-use-power-by-customs-officers-on-complainant-to-extract-truth-be-construed-as-act-linked-to-their-official-duty-rajasthan-high-court-scc-times\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp","width":887,"height":591,"caption":"Rajasthan High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/26\/excess-use-power-by-customs-officers-on-complainant-to-extract-truth-be-construed-as-act-linked-to-their-official-duty-rajasthan-high-court-scc-times\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"S. 197 CrPC | Excess use of power by Customs officers to \u2018extract truth\u2019 is an act done in discharge of official duty: Rajasthan High Court"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9","name":"Ritu","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Ritu"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_7\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":251846,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/28\/section-197-crpc\/","url_meta":{"origin":342312,"position":0},"title":"Real test is to check whether the act was directly concerned with official duty: SC quashes criminal proceedings against clerk accused of conspiring with superiors, for want of S. 197 CrPC sanction","author":"Editor","date":"July 28, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: A Division Bench of Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Hemant Gupta, JJ. upheld Rajasthan High Court's order whereby it had directed that criminal proceedings against the accused\u2212Lower Division Clerk be quashed, for want of requisite sanction under Section 197 CrPC. The Court held that in cases where a question\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-13.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-13.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-13.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-13.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-13.png?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":290479,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/25\/orissa-hc-quashes-criminal-proceedings-against-nesco-orissa-officials-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":342312,"position":1},"title":"Orissa HC quashes Criminal proceedings against NESCO Orissa Officials on grounds of absence of Sanction under Section 197 CrPC","author":"Editor","date":"April 25, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The officers on duty cannot be subjected to undue harassment in the hands of unscrupulous litigants, to prevent malicious prosecution provisions such as Section 168 of the Electricity Act, 2003, are put in place.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Orissa High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-508.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-508.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-508.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-508.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":53721,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/06\/29\/prior-sanction-of-state-government-is-a-condition-precedent-for-taking-cognizance-against-police-officer-discharging-official-duty\/","url_meta":{"origin":342312,"position":2},"title":"Prior sanction of State Government is a condition precedent for taking cognizance against police officer discharging official duty","author":"Sucheta","date":"June 29, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Patna High Court: The 3-judge bench of I. A. Ansari ACJ, Chakradhari Sharan Singh and Navaniti Prasad Singh, JJ upheld the validity of Invoking the provisions as contained in Sub-section (3) of Section 197 , the Notification dated 16.05.1980 issued by Bihar Government, invoking the provisions as contained in Sub-section\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":351346,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/24\/police-officer-exceeding-official-duty-still-protected-under-section-197-crpc-patna-hc-scc-times-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":342312,"position":3},"title":"S. 197 CrPC | Police officer, allegedly exceeding official duty, is safeguarded by prior sanction if acts reasonably linked to official functions: Patna HC","author":"Editor","date":"June 24, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cA mere excess or overreach in the performance of official duty does not, by itself, disentitle a public servant from the statutory protection mandated by law.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Patna High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Patna-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Patna-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Patna-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Patna-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":299129,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/11\/effect-on-trial-for-offences-under-ipc-if-sanction-under-pc-act-declined-sc-highlights-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":342312,"position":4},"title":"How Trial for offences under IPC would be affected if Sanction for offences under PC Act is declined? SC Highlights","author":"Editor","date":"August 11, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cSanction contemplated under Section 197 of the CrPC concerns a public servant who \u2018is accused of any offence alleged to have been committed by him while acting or purporting to act in the discharge of his official duty\u2019 whereas, the offences contemplated in the PC Act, 1988 are those which\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"sanction under pc act declined","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/sanction-under-pc-act-declined.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/sanction-under-pc-act-declined.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/sanction-under-pc-act-declined.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/sanction-under-pc-act-declined.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":371361,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/31\/jhar-hc-sanction-under-s197-not-corruption-shield\/","url_meta":{"origin":342312,"position":5},"title":"Jharkhand HC: Sanction under S. 197 CrPC not a shield for corruption; Cognizance against ex-IAS officer upheld","author":"Soumya Yadav","date":"December 31, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cSanction under section 197 CrPC is only for the acts reasonably connected to official duty, not personal illegal acts even if done by the public servants.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Section 197 not corruption shield","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Section-197-not-corruption-shield.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Section-197-not-corruption-shield.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Section-197-not-corruption-shield.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Section-197-not-corruption-shield.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/342312","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67514"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=342312"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/342312\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/314824"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=342312"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=342312"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=342312"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}