{"id":342303,"date":"2025-02-25T18:00:52","date_gmt":"2025-02-25T12:30:52","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=342303"},"modified":"2025-02-26T18:13:17","modified_gmt":"2025-02-26T12:43:17","slug":"conviction-husband-charged-with-wife-murder-restored-sc-legal-news","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/25\/conviction-husband-charged-with-wife-murder-restored-sc-legal-news\/","title":{"rendered":"Dubious conduct &amp; suspicious circumstances of death; SC restores conviction of husband charged with wife\u2019s murder 22 yrs ago"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Supreme Court:<\/span> While considering the instant appeal challenging the accused husband&#8217;s acquittal in the case concerning his wife&#8217;s death under mysterious circumstances 22 years ago (2003); the Division Bench of <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">J.B. Pardiwala*<\/span> and Manoj Misra, JJ., upon perusing the facts of the case, found that the circumstances in the case constitute more than a prima facie case to enable the prosecution to invoke Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001516684\" target=\"_blank\">106<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726934\" target=\"_blank\">Evidence Act<\/a> and shift the burden on the accused husband to explain what had happened on the day &amp; date his wife died. The Court opined that the prosecution duly established the foundational facts, thereby justifying the invocation of Section 106, Evidence Act. The Court while determining the matter, reiterated the foundational principles regarding testimony of a child witness and convictions based on circumstantial evidence. Hence, the accused husband&#8217;s acquittal was set aside and his conviction and sentence by the Trial Court was restored.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court pointed out that if an offence takes place inside the four walls of a house and in such circumstances where the accused has all the opportunity to plan and commit the offence at the time and in the circumstances of its choice, it will be extremely difficult for the prosecution to lead direct evidence to establish the guilt of the accused. It is to resolve such a situation that Section 106 of the Evidence Act exists in the statute book.<\/p>\n<h3>Background:<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">On the night of 15-7-2003, the complainant along with his father and relatives heard cries and screams of the deceased coming from the house of the accused. After some time, the screams of the deceased stopped. At about in the morning, they learnt from the other inhabitants of the village that the deceased had died during the night and that her body had been cremated.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">After the matter was investigated, a chargesheet was filed against the accused husband and his sister for commission of offences under Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561607\" target=\"_blank\">302<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561485\" target=\"_blank\">201<\/a> read with Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561652\" target=\"_blank\">34<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\">IPC<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Trial Court upon perusal of the evidence, circumstances and witnesses (including a child witness), found the accused husband guilty, convicting and sentencing him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life with fine of Rs. 1,000 for the offence punishable under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561607\" target=\"_blank\">302 IPC<\/a> and four years of rigorous imprisonment along with fine of Rs. 2,000 for the offence punishable under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561485\" target=\"_blank\">201<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\">IPC<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Aggrieved with the afore-stated decision of the Trial Court, the accused appealed before Madhya Pradesh High Court. The High Court via the impugned judgment of 2010, acquitted the accused and set aside the Trial Court&#8217;s order of conviction finding that the testimony of the child witness, (PW6), was unreliable and tutored.<\/p>\n<h3>Court&#8217;s Assessment:<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Upon perusing the case, facts and evidence of the prosecution and reasoning of the High Court in acquitting the accused husband, the Court deemed it fit to examine the principles on appreciation of testimony made by a child witness, circumstantial evidence and applicability of Section 106 of the Evidence Act and found that the offence in the instant case took place inside the four walls of the house in which the accused, the deceased and their 7-year-old daughter (PW6) were living. The accused has not disputed his presence in the house at the time of the alleged incident. Furthermore, the accused failed to inform the family members about the death of their daughter and the clandestine manner in which her body was cremated, more particularly when her family members were residing in the very same village. The Court took note of the accused&#8217;s dubious conduct in fleeing away from home leaving behind his minor daughter of seven years age all alone; deceased untimely death after a marital dispute and failure of the accused to explain incriminating circumstances.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court observed that cases are frequently coming before the Courts where the husbands, due to strained marital relations and doubt as regards the character, have gone to the extent of killing the wife. These crimes are generally committed in complete secrecy inside the house and it becomes very difficult for the prosecution to lead evidence. &#8220;<span style=\"font-style: italic;\">No member of the family like in the case on board, even if he is a witness of the crime, would come forward to depose against another family member&#8221;<\/span>. It was further observed that the role of courts in such circumstances assumes greater importance and it is expected of the courts to deal with like one on hand, cases in a more realistic manner and not allow the criminals to go scot-free on account of procedural technicalities, perfunctory investigation or insignificant lacunas in the evidence as otherwise serious crimes would go unpunished. The courts are expected to be sensitive in cases involving crime against women.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Hence the Court found the instant case to be fit for the prosecution to invoke Section 106 of the Evidence Act and set aside the accused husband&#8217;s acquittal and directed the accused to surrender before the Trial Court within a period of four weeks from 24-2-2025 to undergo the sentence as imposed by the Trial Court.<\/p>\n<h3>Also Read:<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 2%; margin-left: 18pt; font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/26\/conviction-husband-charged-with-wife-murder-section106-evidence-act-direct-evidence-prosecution-sc-legal-news\/\" target=\"_blank\">&#8216;S. 106 exists to resolve situations where prosecution can&#8217;t lead direct evidence&#8217;; SC elaborates key principles of Section 106 Evidence Act<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%; margin-left: 18pt; font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/26\/wife-murder-principles-appreciation-testimony-child-witness-sc-legal-news\/\" target=\"_blank\">&#8216;Evidence Act does not prescribe any minimum age for a witness&#8217;; SC elucidates principles on appreciation of testimony of a child witness<\/a><\/p>\n<p><!--\n\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">State of Madhya Pradesh v. Balveer Singh, CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1669 OF 2012, decided on 24-2-2025<\/span>]<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000080;\">*Judgment by Justice J.B. Pardiwala<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n<hr\/>\n\n\n\n\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For Appellant(s):<\/span> Mr. Pashupathi Nath Razdan, AOR Mr. Sarthak Raizada (GA), Adv. Ms. Maitreyee Jagat Joshi, Adv. Mr. Astik Gupta, Adv. Ms. Akanksha Tomar, Adv.<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For Respondent(s):<\/span> Mr. Anil Shrivastav, AOR Mr. Lakhan Singh Chauhan, Adv. Mr. Hitesh Kumar Sharma, Adv. Mr. Amit Kumar Chawla, Adv. Mr. Akhileshwar Jha, Adv. Mr. Varun Verma, Adv. Mr. Sandeep Singh D., Adv.<\/p>\n\n--><\/p>\n<div style=\"text-overflow: ellipsis; background-color: #92A8D1; text-align:justify; clear:both; text-size-adjust: auto; overflow: auto;\">\n<p style=\"font-size: 18pt; margin-top: 5px; text-align: center;\">CASE DETAILS<\/p>\n<table width=\"100%\" style=\"word-wrap: break-word; border-collapse:collapse; table-layout: fixed; margin-top: 10px;\">\n<colgroup>\n<col width=\"41%\"\/>\n<col width=\"59%\"\/>\n<\/colgroup>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td valign=\"top\">\n<p><span style=\"color: #D4E4F7; font-weight: bold;\">Citation:<\/span><br \/> <span style=\"color: #D4E4F7; font-size: 10pt;\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/Q3g2c38W\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2025 SCC OnLine SC 390<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #D4E4F7; font-weight: bold;\">Appellants&#160;:<\/span><br \/> State of Madhya Pradesh<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #D4E4F7; font-weight: bold;\">Respondents&#160;:<\/span><br \/> Balveer Singh<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td valign=\"top\">\n<p style=\"color: #D4E4F7; font-weight: bold;\">Advocates who appeared in this case<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #D4E4F7; font-weight: bold;\">For Petitioner(s):<\/span><br \/> Mr. Pashupathi Nath Razdan, AOR Mr. Sarthak Raizada (GA), Adv. Ms. Maitreyee Jagat Joshi, Adv. Mr. Astik Gupta, Adv. Ms. Akanksha Tomar, Adv.<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #D4E4F7; font-weight: bold;\">For Respondent(s):<\/span><br \/> Mr. Anil Shrivastav, AOR Mr. Lakhan Singh Chauhan, Adv. Mr. Hitesh Kumar Sharma, Adv. Mr. Amit Kumar Chawla, Adv. Mr. Akhileshwar Jha, Adv. Mr. Varun Verma, Adv. Mr. Sandeep Singh D., Adv.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p style=\"font-size: 12pt; margin-top: -20px; margin-left: 5px;\"><span style=\"color: #D4E4F7; font-weight: bold;\">CORAM&#160;:<\/span><\/p>\n<div id=\"banner\" style=\"overflow: hidden; display: flex; justify-content: space-between; padding-left: 3%;\">\n<div class=\"\" style=\"max-width: 100%; max-height: 100%; font-size: 9pt; text-align: center;\">\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/12\/know-thy-judge-justice-jb-pardiwala-supreme-court-gujarat-high-court\/\" target=\"_blank\"><img decoding=\"async\" height=\"100px\" width=\"100px\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scobserver.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/WhatsApp-Image-2022-05-09-at-6.14.52-PM-modified.png\" alt=\"J.B. Pardiwala, J.\" style=\"border-radius: 50%; border:2px solid #FF5733; padding: 1px;\"><br \/><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">J.B. Pardiwala, J.<\/span><\/img><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"\" style=\"max-width: 100%; max-height: 100%; font-size: 9pt; text-align: center;\">\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" height=\"100px\" width=\"100px\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scobserver.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/Manoj-Misra-Circle.png\" alt=\"Manoj Misra, J.\" style=\"border-radius: 50%;\"><br \/><span style=\"color: black !important;\">Manoj Misra, J.<\/span><\/img><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"\" style=\"max-width: 100%; max-height: 100%;\"><\/div>\n<div class=\"\" style=\"max-width: 100%; max-height: 100%;\"><\/div>\n<div class=\"\" style=\"max-width: 100%; max-height: 100%;\"><\/div>\n<div class=\"\" style=\"max-width: 100%; max-height: 100%;\"><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Penal Code, 1860 &nbsp; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1158\" target=\"_blank\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1158\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"penal code, 1860\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294601\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-768x511.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-440x293.jpg 440w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-650x433.jpg 650w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860.jpg 886w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-60x40.jpg 60w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">The Court found that circumstances in the case constitute more than a prima facie case to enable the prosecution to invoke Section 106 of the Evidence Act and shift the burden on the accused husband to explain what had happened on the day &amp; date his wife died.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":342310,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,9],"tags":[4561,2573,3433,3171,60145,55020,62286,77920,3156,79076],"class_list":["post-342303","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-supremecourt","tag-acquittal","tag-child_witness","tag-circumstantial_evidence","tag-Domestic_Violence","tag-incriminating-circumstances","tag-justice-jb-pardiwala","tag-marital-disputes","tag-marital-violence","tag-murder","tag-restoration-of-conviction"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>SC restores conviction of husband charged with wife&#039;s murder 22 yrs ago<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Dubious conduct &amp; suspicious circumstances of death; SC restores conviction of husband charged with wife&#039;s murder 22 yrs ago.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/25\/conviction-husband-charged-with-wife-murder-restored-sc-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Dubious conduct &amp; suspicious circumstances of death; SC restores conviction of husband charged with wife\u2019s murder 22 yrs ago\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Dubious conduct &amp; suspicious circumstances of death; SC restores conviction of husband charged with wife&#039;s murder 22 yrs ago.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/25\/conviction-husband-charged-with-wife-murder-restored-sc-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-02-25T12:30:52+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-02-26T12:43:17+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/wife-murder-husband-conviction.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Dubious conduct &amp; suspicious circumstances of death; SC restores conviction of husband charged with wife\u2019s murder 22 yrs ago\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/25\/conviction-husband-charged-with-wife-murder-restored-sc-legal-news\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/25\/conviction-husband-charged-with-wife-murder-restored-sc-legal-news\/\",\"name\":\"SC restores conviction of husband charged with wife's murder 22 yrs ago\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/25\/conviction-husband-charged-with-wife-murder-restored-sc-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/25\/conviction-husband-charged-with-wife-murder-restored-sc-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/wife-murder-husband-conviction.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-02-25T12:30:52+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-02-26T12:43:17+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\"},\"description\":\"Dubious conduct & suspicious circumstances of death; SC restores conviction of husband charged with wife's murder 22 yrs ago.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/25\/conviction-husband-charged-with-wife-murder-restored-sc-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/25\/conviction-husband-charged-with-wife-murder-restored-sc-legal-news\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/25\/conviction-husband-charged-with-wife-murder-restored-sc-legal-news\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/wife-murder-husband-conviction.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/wife-murder-husband-conviction.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"wife murder husband conviction\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/25\/conviction-husband-charged-with-wife-murder-restored-sc-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Dubious conduct &amp; suspicious circumstances of death; SC restores conviction of husband charged with wife\u2019s murder 22 yrs ago\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\",\"name\":\"Sucheta\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Sucheta\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"SC restores conviction of husband charged with wife's murder 22 yrs ago","description":"Dubious conduct & suspicious circumstances of death; SC restores conviction of husband charged with wife's murder 22 yrs ago.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/25\/conviction-husband-charged-with-wife-murder-restored-sc-legal-news\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Dubious conduct & suspicious circumstances of death; SC restores conviction of husband charged with wife\u2019s murder 22 yrs ago","og_description":"Dubious conduct & suspicious circumstances of death; SC restores conviction of husband charged with wife's murder 22 yrs ago.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/25\/conviction-husband-charged-with-wife-murder-restored-sc-legal-news\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2025-02-25T12:30:52+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-02-26T12:43:17+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/wife-murder-husband-conviction.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Sucheta","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Dubious conduct &amp; suspicious circumstances of death; SC restores conviction of husband charged with wife\u2019s murder 22 yrs ago","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Sucheta","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/25\/conviction-husband-charged-with-wife-murder-restored-sc-legal-news\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/25\/conviction-husband-charged-with-wife-murder-restored-sc-legal-news\/","name":"SC restores conviction of husband charged with wife's murder 22 yrs ago","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/25\/conviction-husband-charged-with-wife-murder-restored-sc-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/25\/conviction-husband-charged-with-wife-murder-restored-sc-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/wife-murder-husband-conviction.webp","datePublished":"2025-02-25T12:30:52+00:00","dateModified":"2025-02-26T12:43:17+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa"},"description":"Dubious conduct & suspicious circumstances of death; SC restores conviction of husband charged with wife's murder 22 yrs ago.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/25\/conviction-husband-charged-with-wife-murder-restored-sc-legal-news\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/25\/conviction-husband-charged-with-wife-murder-restored-sc-legal-news\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/25\/conviction-husband-charged-with-wife-murder-restored-sc-legal-news\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/wife-murder-husband-conviction.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/wife-murder-husband-conviction.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"wife murder husband conviction"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/25\/conviction-husband-charged-with-wife-murder-restored-sc-legal-news\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Dubious conduct &amp; suspicious circumstances of death; SC restores conviction of husband charged with wife\u2019s murder 22 yrs ago"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa","name":"Sucheta","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Sucheta"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/wife-murder-husband-conviction.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":273290,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/08\/supreme-court-karnataka-high-court-section-302-of-the-penal-code-section-378-crpc-conviction-acquittal-unlawful-assembly-murder-common-object-first-information-reports-rioting-trespass-wi\/","url_meta":{"origin":342303,"position":0},"title":"Reversing acquittal of only 2 out of 22 acquitted murder accused, despite glaring contradictions between witness testimonies, illogical; SC sets aside Karnataka HC verdict","author":"Editor","date":"September 8, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Supreme Court: In an appeal against the Karnataka High Court's reversal of acquittal of 2 out of the 22 accused acquitted by the Sessions Court in a murder case, the bench of V. Ramasubramanian*and Indira Banerjee, JJ has reversed the High Court's verdict observing that there were glaring\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-69-2.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-69-2.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-69-2.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-69-2.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-69-2.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":342332,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/26\/conviction-husband-charged-with-wife-murder-section106-evidence-act-direct-evidence-prosecution-sc-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":342303,"position":1},"title":"\u2018S. 106 exists to resolve situations where prosecution can\u2019t lead direct evidence\u2019; SC elaborates key principles of Section 106 Evidence Act","author":"Sucheta","date":"February 26, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court found that circumstances in the instant case constituted more than a prima facie case to enable the prosecution to invoke Section 106 of the Evidence Act and shift the burden on the accused husband to explain what had happened on the day & date his wife died.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"section 106 evidence act","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/section-106-evidence-act.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/section-106-evidence-act.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/section-106-evidence-act.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/section-106-evidence-act.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":295863,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/03\/chain-circumstantial-evidence-incomplete-interfere-with-acquittal-supreme-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":342303,"position":2},"title":"\u2018Chain of circumstantial evidence incomplete to interfere with acquittal\u2019; Supreme Court affirms acquittal in 25-year-old case","author":"Ridhi","date":"July 3, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court concurred with the Punjab and Haryana High Court that incriminating circumstances were not proved beyond reasonable doubt and chain of evidence was not complete to interfere with a degree of certainty of accused having committed the crime.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"chain of circumstantial evidence","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/chain-of-circumstantial-evidence.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/chain-of-circumstantial-evidence.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/chain-of-circumstantial-evidence.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/chain-of-circumstantial-evidence.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":268950,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/24\/honour-killing-acquittal-28-years-later-last-seen-together-benefit-of-doubt-supreme-court-murder-conviction-criminal-law-legal-research-updates-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":342303,"position":3},"title":"No conviction based on &#8216;last seen together&#8217; theory when possibility of suicidal death not ruled out; SC sets man free in a 28-year-old honour killing case","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"June 24, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe suspicion howsoever strong cannot take place of proof.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/No-conviction-based-on-last-seen-together-theory-when-possibility-of-suicidal-death-not-ruled-out-SC-sets-man-free-in-a-28-year-old-honour-killing-case.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/No-conviction-based-on-last-seen-together-theory-when-possibility-of-suicidal-death-not-ruled-out-SC-sets-man-free-in-a-28-year-old-honour-killing-case.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/No-conviction-based-on-last-seen-together-theory-when-possibility-of-suicidal-death-not-ruled-out-SC-sets-man-free-in-a-28-year-old-honour-killing-case.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/No-conviction-based-on-last-seen-together-theory-when-possibility-of-suicidal-death-not-ruled-out-SC-sets-man-free-in-a-28-year-old-honour-killing-case.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/No-conviction-based-on-last-seen-together-theory-when-possibility-of-suicidal-death-not-ruled-out-SC-sets-man-free-in-a-28-year-old-honour-killing-case.png?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":289090,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/10\/suggestions-made-to-witness-by-defence-and-reply-to-the-same-would-form-part-of-evidence-to-determine-guilt-of-accused-supreme-court-upholds-bombay-high-court-conviction-for-murder-legal-news-legal-re\/","url_meta":{"origin":342303,"position":4},"title":"Suggestions to witness by defence and reply to the same forms part of evidence to determine guilt of accused; SC upholds conviction in murder case","author":"Editor","date":"April 10, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court was quick to clarify that if prosecution was unable to prove its case on its own legs, then it won\u2019t be able to derive advantage from the weakness of the defence and the Court would not be able to convict the accused on the strength of the evidence\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Suggestion to witness by defense","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-1065.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-1065.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-1065.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-1065.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":275752,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/17\/death-row-convict-acquitted-defence-below-average-no-evidence-experienced-lawyers-to-be-appointed-as-legal-aid-counsels-supreme-court-legal-research-updates-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":342303,"position":5},"title":"&#8216;Appoint experienced advocates as legal aid counsels&#8217;: SC acquits death row convict for want of evidence, finds defence &#8216;below-average&#8217;\u00a0","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"October 17, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"The Supreme Court was disappointed with the standard of investigation and the defence put up in a gruesome case relating to murder of wife and 4 children by the accused. The Court observed that while the accused was provided with a legal aid, the cross-examination of each and every witness\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/MicrosoftTeams-image-1-1-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/MicrosoftTeams-image-1-1-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/MicrosoftTeams-image-1-1-1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/MicrosoftTeams-image-1-1-1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/MicrosoftTeams-image-1-1-1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/342303","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=342303"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/342303\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/342310"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=342303"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=342303"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=342303"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}