{"id":342020,"date":"2025-02-21T18:00:22","date_gmt":"2025-02-21T12:30:22","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=342020"},"modified":"2025-02-27T14:39:22","modified_gmt":"2025-02-27T09:09:22","slug":"non-payment-of-salary-to-employee-amounts-to-begar-under-article-23-it-is-impermissible-rajasthan-high-court-scc-times","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/21\/non-payment-of-salary-to-employee-amounts-to-begar-under-article-23-it-is-impermissible-rajasthan-high-court-scc-times\/","title":{"rendered":"Non-payment of salary to employee amounts to Begar under Article 23 &amp; is impermissible: Rajasthan High Court"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Rajasthan High Court:<\/span> In a writ petition by an employee under the State of Rajasthan, who is denied salary since 2016, despite actively rendering services, a single-judge bench of Anoop Kumar Dhand, J., held that withholding salary amounts to exploitation and violation of fundamental rights under Articles <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001574949\" target=\"_blank\">21<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001574975\" target=\"_blank\">23<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\" target=\"_blank\">Constitution of India<\/a>. The Court ordered the respondents to pay the salary promptly, failing which strict action, including contempt proceedings, would follow.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%; margin-left: 36pt; font-weight: bold;\">&#8220;Non-payment of salary to an employee amounts to depriving him of his livelihood. Such person cannot be allowed to starve at the hands of the authorities without any justified reason.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In the instant matter, the petitioner, an employee of the State Government, was not paid salary since 2016. The Rajasthan Civil Services Appellate Tribunal, Jaipur, vide order dated 09-09-2021, directed the respondents to release the petitioner&#8217;s due salary. Despite the Tribunal&#8217;s order, the petitioner did not receive any payment.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The petitioner approached the High Court, which issued notices to the respondents on 16-02-2024 and directed them to consider the non-payment issue and pass appropriate orders. More than a year later, the respondents still failed to release the salary.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The petitioner contended that the right to livelihood is an essential part of the right to life under Article 21 and the continued withholding of salary despite the petitioner&#8217;s services amounts to forced labor and exploitation. It was contended that Article 23 prohibits Begar, and non-payment of salary for services rendered falls within its scope. It was contended that the respondents have defied the orders of the Tribunal and the High Court. However, the respondents contended that the petitioner failed to complete required formalities, and the salary could not be processed without the necessary documentation.<\/p>\n<p style=\"\">The Court noted that the respondents continued to avail the petitioner&#8217;s services while denying him his rightful salary. The Court rejected the argument that the petitioner did not fill out forms and stated that the authorities failed to provide any documentary evidence to support their claim that the petitioner was asked to complete formalities.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%; margin-left: 36pt; font-weight: bold;\">&#8220;The right to livelihood is an integral part of the right to life guaranteed under Article <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001574949\" target=\"_blank\">21<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\" target=\"_blank\">Constitution of India<\/a>.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p style=\"\">The Court reaffirmed that salary is essential for survival, and denying salary amounts to depriving an individual of their right to life. The Court asserted that the State cannot delay salary payments on procedural grounds when work has been continuously taken from the petitioner.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%; margin-left: 36pt; font-weight: bold;\">&#8220;Payment of salary or pension to the employees is only to eke out their livelihood during their service by way of salary and after retirement by way of pension. If, whole or part of the salary or pension is deferred, it amounts to denial of right to life guaranteed under Article <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001574949\" target=\"_blank\">21<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\" target=\"_blank\">Constitution of India<\/a>.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court stated that the right to live with human dignity, free from exploitation is enshrined in Article 21 and derives its life breadth from the Directive Principles of State Policy and particularly Articles 39(e), 39(f), 41 and 42, and therefore, <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">&#8220;it must include the right to live with human dignity, the right to take any action which will deprive a person of enjoyment of basic right to live with dignity as an integral part of the constitutional right guaranteed under Article 21.&#8221;<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court stated that &#8220;Begar&#8221; means forcing someone to work without proper remuneration. The Court held that deliberate non-payment of substantial salary without justification constitutes forced labour, which is prohibited under Article 23. The Court referred to <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Maneka Gandhi<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Union of India<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/d84cQX9l\" target=\"_blank\">(1978) 1 SCC 248<\/a> and <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Olga Tellis<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Bombay Municipal Corpn.<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/moBBIYLI\" target=\"_blank\">(1985) 3 SCC 545<\/a>, where the Supreme Court recognised the right to livelihood as a fundamental right.<\/p>\n<p style=\"\">The Court asserted that the State&#8217;s non-compliance with the Tribunal&#8217;s order dated 09-09-2021 and the High Court&#8217;s notice dated 16-02-2024 shows the blatant disregard for judicial authority. The Court emphasised that public authorities cannot use bureaucratic excuses to violate an employee&#8217;s fundamental rights. The Court held that such procedural excuses cannot be used to deny an employee&#8217;s rightful wages.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%; margin-left: 36pt; font-weight: bold;\">&#8220;Fundamental Rights cannot be waived by any person and, therefore, by no stretch of imagination it can be said that mere not filing certain forms and completing the requisite formalities delay in filing the petition amounts to waiver of the right to get salary. No employer can be permitted to deprive the employees of their rightful salaries, that too month after month.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court held that non- payment of salary for 97 months constitutes a violation of Articles <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001574949\" target=\"_blank\">21<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001574975\" target=\"_blank\">23<\/a>, and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001575115\" target=\"_blank\">300-A<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\" target=\"_blank\">Constitution of India<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court directed the respondents are directed to release the petitioner&#8217;s due salary within one month and failure to comply will lead to contempt proceedings against senior officials, including, Secretary, Panchayati Raj Department, Rajasthan; Additional Chief Secretary, Department of Finance; Commissioner, State Insurance and Provident Fund Department and Director, Department of Pension. The Court further directed that if the order is not complied with, the Chief Secretary of Rajasthan is to withhold the salaries of the above officials. The Court listed the matter for compliance on 12-03-2025.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Sunil Dattatrey<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">State of Rajasthan<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/f7tki3SD\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2025 SCC OnLine Raj 361<\/a>, Decided on 10-02-2025<\/span>]<\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">Mr. Akshit Gupta and Ms. Pragya Seth, Counsel for the Petitioner<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">Ms. Sara Parveen on behalf of Mr. Kapil Prakash Mathur, AAG, Counsel for the Respondents<\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Constitution of India &nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product\/the-constitution-of-india-coat-pocket-edition?products_id=100647\" target=\"_blank\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product\/the-constitution-of-india-coat-pocket-edition?products_id=100647\" target=\"_blank\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/s3.amazonaws.com\/ebcwebstore\/images\/the-constitution-of-india-coat-pocket-edition-Gopal-Sankaranarayanan-ebc-front-cover.JPG\" alt=\"Constitution of India\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294438\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">&#8220;The sweep of the right to life conferred by Article 21 of Constitution of India is wide and far reaching. An important facet of that right is right to livelihood, because no person can live without the means of living, i.e., the means of the livelihood.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67514,"featured_media":314824,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[13681,30311,30310,11821,3268,66973,37080,78973,36608,2575,34915],"class_list":["post-342020","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-article-21","tag-article-23","tag-begar","tag-contempt-of-court","tag-Fundamental_Rights","tag-justice-anoop-kumar-dhand","tag-non-payment-of-salary","tag-non-payment-of-salary-to-employee","tag-rajasthan-civil-services-appellate-tribunal","tag-Rajasthan_High_Court","tag-right-to-livelihood"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Non-payment of salary to employee amounts to Begar under Article 23 &amp; \u201cit is impermissible\u201d: Rajasthan High Court | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Rajasthan High Court held that non-payment of salary to employee amounts to Begar under Article 23 &amp; \u201cit is impermissible\u201d.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/21\/non-payment-of-salary-to-employee-amounts-to-begar-under-article-23-it-is-impermissible-rajasthan-high-court-scc-times\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Non-payment of salary to employee amounts to Begar under Article 23 &amp; is impermissible: Rajasthan High Court\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Rajasthan High Court held that non-payment of salary to employee amounts to Begar under Article 23 &amp; \u201cit is impermissible\u201d.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/21\/non-payment-of-salary-to-employee-amounts-to-begar-under-article-23-it-is-impermissible-rajasthan-high-court-scc-times\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-02-21T12:30:22+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-02-27T09:09:22+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"591\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Non-payment of salary to employee amounts to Begar under Article 23 &amp; is impermissible: Rajasthan High Court\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/21\/non-payment-of-salary-to-employee-amounts-to-begar-under-article-23-it-is-impermissible-rajasthan-high-court-scc-times\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/21\/non-payment-of-salary-to-employee-amounts-to-begar-under-article-23-it-is-impermissible-rajasthan-high-court-scc-times\/\",\"name\":\"Non-payment of salary to employee amounts to Begar under Article 23 & \u201cit is impermissible\u201d: Rajasthan High Court | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/21\/non-payment-of-salary-to-employee-amounts-to-begar-under-article-23-it-is-impermissible-rajasthan-high-court-scc-times\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/21\/non-payment-of-salary-to-employee-amounts-to-begar-under-article-23-it-is-impermissible-rajasthan-high-court-scc-times\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-02-21T12:30:22+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-02-27T09:09:22+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\"},\"description\":\"Rajasthan High Court held that non-payment of salary to employee amounts to Begar under Article 23 & \u201cit is impermissible\u201d.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/21\/non-payment-of-salary-to-employee-amounts-to-begar-under-article-23-it-is-impermissible-rajasthan-high-court-scc-times\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/21\/non-payment-of-salary-to-employee-amounts-to-begar-under-article-23-it-is-impermissible-rajasthan-high-court-scc-times\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/21\/non-payment-of-salary-to-employee-amounts-to-begar-under-article-23-it-is-impermissible-rajasthan-high-court-scc-times\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp\",\"width\":887,\"height\":591,\"caption\":\"Rajasthan High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/21\/non-payment-of-salary-to-employee-amounts-to-begar-under-article-23-it-is-impermissible-rajasthan-high-court-scc-times\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Non-payment of salary to employee amounts to Begar under Article 23 &amp; is impermissible: Rajasthan High Court\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\",\"name\":\"Ritu\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Ritu\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_7\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Non-payment of salary to employee amounts to Begar under Article 23 & \u201cit is impermissible\u201d: Rajasthan High Court | SCC Times","description":"Rajasthan High Court held that non-payment of salary to employee amounts to Begar under Article 23 & \u201cit is impermissible\u201d.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/21\/non-payment-of-salary-to-employee-amounts-to-begar-under-article-23-it-is-impermissible-rajasthan-high-court-scc-times\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Non-payment of salary to employee amounts to Begar under Article 23 & is impermissible: Rajasthan High Court","og_description":"Rajasthan High Court held that non-payment of salary to employee amounts to Begar under Article 23 & \u201cit is impermissible\u201d.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/21\/non-payment-of-salary-to-employee-amounts-to-begar-under-article-23-it-is-impermissible-rajasthan-high-court-scc-times\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2025-02-21T12:30:22+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-02-27T09:09:22+00:00","og_image":[{"width":887,"height":591,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Ritu","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Non-payment of salary to employee amounts to Begar under Article 23 &amp; is impermissible: Rajasthan High Court","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Ritu","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/21\/non-payment-of-salary-to-employee-amounts-to-begar-under-article-23-it-is-impermissible-rajasthan-high-court-scc-times\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/21\/non-payment-of-salary-to-employee-amounts-to-begar-under-article-23-it-is-impermissible-rajasthan-high-court-scc-times\/","name":"Non-payment of salary to employee amounts to Begar under Article 23 & \u201cit is impermissible\u201d: Rajasthan High Court | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/21\/non-payment-of-salary-to-employee-amounts-to-begar-under-article-23-it-is-impermissible-rajasthan-high-court-scc-times\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/21\/non-payment-of-salary-to-employee-amounts-to-begar-under-article-23-it-is-impermissible-rajasthan-high-court-scc-times\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp","datePublished":"2025-02-21T12:30:22+00:00","dateModified":"2025-02-27T09:09:22+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9"},"description":"Rajasthan High Court held that non-payment of salary to employee amounts to Begar under Article 23 & \u201cit is impermissible\u201d.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/21\/non-payment-of-salary-to-employee-amounts-to-begar-under-article-23-it-is-impermissible-rajasthan-high-court-scc-times\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/21\/non-payment-of-salary-to-employee-amounts-to-begar-under-article-23-it-is-impermissible-rajasthan-high-court-scc-times\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/21\/non-payment-of-salary-to-employee-amounts-to-begar-under-article-23-it-is-impermissible-rajasthan-high-court-scc-times\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp","width":887,"height":591,"caption":"Rajasthan High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/21\/non-payment-of-salary-to-employee-amounts-to-begar-under-article-23-it-is-impermissible-rajasthan-high-court-scc-times\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Non-payment of salary to employee amounts to Begar under Article 23 &amp; is impermissible: Rajasthan High Court"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9","name":"Ritu","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Ritu"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_7\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":196615,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/05\/31\/withholding-salary-in-lieu-of-service-provided-amounts-to-begar-prohibited-under-article-23-of-constitution\/","url_meta":{"origin":342020,"position":0},"title":"Withholding salary in lieu of service provided amounts to \u2018begar\u2019 prohibited under Article 23 of Constitution","author":"Saba","date":"May 31, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court: While deciding a writ petition, a Division Bench comprising of Pankaj Mithal and Saral Srivastava, JJ., directed the respondents to pay arrears of salary due to the petitioner. The petitioner worked as the Assistant Director of Institute of Correspondence Course and Continuing Education in the University of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":298495,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/04\/rajasthan-hc-directed-the-grant-of-notional-increment-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":342020,"position":1},"title":"Notional increment cannot be denied on the ground that the person retired one day before the increment was due: Rajasthan High Court reiterates","author":"Editor","date":"August 4, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cWhen the position of law is almost identical everywhere in the other States and when the benefit of Annual Increment is given to such employees, then denial of such benefits to the petitioners would amount to violation of their right of equality enshrined under Article 14 of the Constitution.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"rajasthan high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/rajasthan-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/rajasthan-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/rajasthan-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/rajasthan-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":215815,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/17\/raj-hc-respondent-not-to-absolve-itself-from-responsibility-when-interim-order-passed-by-court-payment-of-salary-to-be-made-till-interim-order-continues\/","url_meta":{"origin":342020,"position":2},"title":"Raj HC | Respondent not to absolve itself from responsibility when interim order passed by court; payment of salary to be made till interim order continues","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"June 17, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Rajasthan High Court:\u00a0 Ashok Kumar Gaur, J., allowed the application on the ground that so long the interim order was passed by the court the respondent can not absolve itself from the responsibility of payment of salary to the petitioner. An application was made by the petitioner for seeking direction\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":354734,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/28\/rajasthan-high-court-disabled-employee-salary-benefits-rpwd-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":342020,"position":3},"title":"Denial of benefits under Section 20(4) of Rights of Persons with Disability Act violates Article 21: Rajasthan High Court","author":"Editor","date":"July 28, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe case reflects the insensitivity and apathy of the respondents towards the plight of a disabled person who has been denied for last about five and a half year without any justification which frustrates the laud object of the enactment of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Disabled employee salary and other benefits","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Disabled-employee-salary-and-other-benefits.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Disabled-employee-salary-and-other-benefits.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Disabled-employee-salary-and-other-benefits.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Disabled-employee-salary-and-other-benefits.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":255514,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/12\/3-advocates-and-2-judicial-officers-appointed-as-judges-of-rajasthan-high-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":342020,"position":4},"title":"3 Advocates and 2 Judicial Officers appointed as Judges of Rajasthan High Court","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 12, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"President appoints the following Advocates and Judicial Officers as Judges of the Rajasthan High Court and directs them to assume charge of their respective offices: - Sl. No. Name (S\/Shri) Name of the High Court in which appointed 1. Farjand Ali, Advocate Rajasthan 2. Sudesh Bansal, Advocate Rajasthan 3. Anoop\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Appointments &amp; Transfers&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Appointments &amp; Transfers","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/appointments\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":208030,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/14\/raj-hc-computation-of-actual-benefits-of-leave-encashment-and-salary-of-summer-vacations-under-ugc-regulations-ordered\/","url_meta":{"origin":342020,"position":5},"title":"Raj HC | Computation of actual benefits of leave encashment and salary of summer vacations under UGC Regulations ordered","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 14, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Rajasthan High Court: A Division Bench comprising of Goverdhan Bardhar\u00a0and Mohammad Rafiq, JJ., upheld the appeal directed against the order passed by the Single Judge questioning the order by which respondents were directed to comply with the mandate of Regulation 13.1 of the University Grants Commission Regulations, 2010 and to\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/342020","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67514"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=342020"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/342020\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/314824"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=342020"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=342020"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=342020"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}