{"id":341897,"date":"2025-02-20T10:00:04","date_gmt":"2025-02-20T04:30:04","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=341897"},"modified":"2025-02-26T09:44:44","modified_gmt":"2025-02-26T04:14:44","slug":"non-signing-of-witness-depositions-by-magistrate-fatal-to-prosecution-case-punjab-haryana-hc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/20\/non-signing-of-witness-depositions-by-magistrate-fatal-to-prosecution-case-punjab-haryana-hc\/","title":{"rendered":"\u2018Non-signing of witness depositions by Magistrate is fatal to prosecution case\u2019; P&H HC acquits two teachers in assault case"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Punjab and Haryana High Court:<\/span> In a set of two revision petitions filed by two teachers convicted under Sections 294<\/a>1<\/sup><\/a> and 357<\/a>2<\/sup><\/a> of the Penal Code, 1860<\/a> (‘IPC’) against the judgment of conviction as well as the judgment rejecting the appeals filed by the convicts, a Single Judge Bench of Harpreet Singh Brar, J., allowed the revision petitions reiterating that since Section 275(4)<\/a>3<\/sup><\/a> of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973<\/a> (‘CrPC’) was mandatory, the non-signing of witness depositions by the Magistrate was fatal to the prosecution case. The Court also reiterated that a witness’s testimony could not be read into evidence till the opposite party was granted an opportunity to cross-examine.<\/p>\n

Background<\/h3>\n

The complainant was employed as a teacher at Government Senior Secondary School, Sarai Ahmad Naseerpur, along with both the convicts. One day, convict 1 took a photo of the complainant. When she complained about it to another teacher, convict 1 pushed her into a room and tried to close the door, intending to outrage her modesty. However, the complainant managed to escape. Aggrieved, she filed a complaint with the police. Thereafter, convict 1 threatened to implicate her and her husband in a false case under the Scheduled Caste and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989<\/a>, whereas convict 2 started calling her, uttering obscene words while threatening to kill her. He harassed her mentally by calling her multiple times in a day.<\/p>\n

In the trial, the convicts were held guilty under Sections 294<\/a> and 357<\/a> of IPC<\/a> and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for six months and pay a fine of Rs.1,500 each. Aggrieved, an appeal was filed by the convicts, but it was rejected. Thus, the present revision petitions were filed.<\/p>\n

Analysis<\/h3>\n

The Court stated that a bare perusal of Section 275<\/a> of CrPC<\/a> indicated that any evidence taken by the jurisdictional Magistrate, in written form, shall be signed by him for it to be considered as evidence and form a part of the record of the jurisdictional Court. Thus, the drill of Section 275(4)<\/a> of CrPC<\/a> is mandatory in nature, and the non-signing of the witness depositions by a Magistrate would be fatal to the case of the prosecution. The Court further stated that the failure to abide by Section 275(4) alone would be sufficient to suffocate the case of the prosecution since the same was not an inconsequential irregularity, rather it impacted the entire prosecution. Any testimony recorded in a warrant case, without following the drill of Section 275(4), could not be read into evidence.<\/span><\/p>\n

The Court reiterated that all evidence collected by the Investigating Officer during the course of the investigation was required to be proved in accordance with the law. In the present case, the Court noted that two Investigating Officers, i.e., PW4 and PW5, conducted the investigation. PW4 did not come forward for his cross-examination, and consequently, the part of the investigation conducted by him and the evidence collected by him remained unproved. Additionally, the deposition of the PW5 was not signed and endorsed by the jurisdictional Court, rendering the same unworthy of any reliance.<\/p>\n

The Court highlighted that it was trite law that a witness’s testimony could not be read into evidence till the opposite party was granted an opportunity to cross-examine him\/her. Denial of such opportunity would prejudice the opposite party and hamper their ability to present the best available evidence, which was in direct violation of the right to a free and fair trial enshrined under Article 21<\/a> of the Constitution<\/a> as well as the principles of natural justice. The Court stated that while it was true that the testimony in itself, might have some probative value, it was the circumstances that would cause the Court to decide if cross-examination would shake the witness’s credibility. In this regard, the Court referred to Ekene Godwin<\/span> v. State of T.N.<\/span>, 2024 SCC OnLine SC 337<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Thus, the Court allowed the revision petitions and set aside the impugned judgments, thereby acquitting the convicts.<\/p>\n

[Rajender Singh v. State of Haryana, 2025 SCC OnLine P&H 811<\/a>, decided on 10-02-2025<\/span>]<\/p>\n\n

Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n

For the petitioner:<\/span> N.C. Kinra and Rajesh Lamba<\/p>\n

For the respondent:<\/span> AAG Ramesh Kumar Ambavta<\/p>\n

Buy Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973  HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n

\"Code<\/a><\/p>\n

Buy Constitution of India  HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n

\"Constitution<\/a><\/p>\n

Buy Penal Code, 1860   HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n

\"penal<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n\n

1.<\/a> Section 296<\/a> of Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023<\/a><\/p>\n

2.<\/a> Section 135<\/a> of Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n

3.<\/a> Section 310<\/a> of Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Failure to abide by Section 275(4) Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 alone would be sufficient to suffocate the case of the prosecution, since the same is not an inconsequential irregularity, rather it impacts the entire prosecution.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":314970,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[4561,22484,9121,78898,50918,2670,78897,53426],"class_list":["post-341897","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-acquittal","tag-assault","tag-cross-examination","tag-non-signing-of-witness-depositions-by-magistrate","tag-outraging-modesty","tag-Punjab_and_Haryana_High_Court","tag-section-275-crpc","tag-witness-depositions"],"yoast_head":"\n\u2018Non-signing of witness depositions by Magistrate, fatal to prosecution case\u2019; Punjab & Haryana HC | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Punjab & Haryana HC acquitted two teachers in assault case, reiterated non-signing of witness depositions by Magistrate was fatal to prosecution case.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/20\/non-signing-of-witness-depositions-by-magistrate-fatal-to-prosecution-case-punjab-haryana-hc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"\u2018Non-signing of witness depositions by Magistrate is fatal to prosecution case\u2019; P&H HC acquits two teachers in assault case\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Punjab & Haryana HC acquitted two teachers in assault case, reiterated non-signing of witness depositions by Magistrate was fatal to prosecution case.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/20\/non-signing-of-witness-depositions-by-magistrate-fatal-to-prosecution-case-punjab-haryana-hc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-02-20T04:30:04+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-02-26T04:14:44+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Punjab-and-Haryana-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"591\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"\u2018Non-signing of witness depositions by Magistrate is fatal to prosecution case\u2019; P&H HC acquits two teachers in assault case\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/20\/non-signing-of-witness-depositions-by-magistrate-fatal-to-prosecution-case-punjab-haryana-hc\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/20\/non-signing-of-witness-depositions-by-magistrate-fatal-to-prosecution-case-punjab-haryana-hc\/\",\"name\":\"\u2018Non-signing of witness depositions by Magistrate, fatal to prosecution case\u2019; Punjab & Haryana HC | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/20\/non-signing-of-witness-depositions-by-magistrate-fatal-to-prosecution-case-punjab-haryana-hc\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/20\/non-signing-of-witness-depositions-by-magistrate-fatal-to-prosecution-case-punjab-haryana-hc\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Punjab-and-Haryana-High-Court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-02-20T04:30:04+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-02-26T04:14:44+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"Punjab & Haryana HC acquitted two teachers in assault case, reiterated non-signing of witness depositions by Magistrate was fatal to prosecution case.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/20\/non-signing-of-witness-depositions-by-magistrate-fatal-to-prosecution-case-punjab-haryana-hc\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/20\/non-signing-of-witness-depositions-by-magistrate-fatal-to-prosecution-case-punjab-haryana-hc\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/20\/non-signing-of-witness-depositions-by-magistrate-fatal-to-prosecution-case-punjab-haryana-hc\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Punjab-and-Haryana-High-Court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Punjab-and-Haryana-High-Court.webp\",\"width\":887,\"height\":591,\"caption\":\"Punjab and Haryana High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/20\/non-signing-of-witness-depositions-by-magistrate-fatal-to-prosecution-case-punjab-haryana-hc\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"\u2018Non-signing of witness depositions by Magistrate is fatal to prosecution case\u2019; P&H HC acquits two teachers in assault case\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"\u2018Non-signing of witness depositions by Magistrate, fatal to prosecution case\u2019; Punjab & Haryana HC | SCC Times","description":"Punjab & Haryana HC acquitted two teachers in assault case, reiterated non-signing of witness depositions by Magistrate was fatal to prosecution case.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/20\/non-signing-of-witness-depositions-by-magistrate-fatal-to-prosecution-case-punjab-haryana-hc\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"\u2018Non-signing of witness depositions by Magistrate is fatal to prosecution case\u2019; P&H HC acquits two teachers in assault case","og_description":"Punjab & Haryana HC acquitted two teachers in assault case, reiterated non-signing of witness depositions by Magistrate was fatal to prosecution case.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/20\/non-signing-of-witness-depositions-by-magistrate-fatal-to-prosecution-case-punjab-haryana-hc\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2025-02-20T04:30:04+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-02-26T04:14:44+00:00","og_image":[{"width":887,"height":591,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Punjab-and-Haryana-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"\u2018Non-signing of witness depositions by Magistrate is fatal to prosecution case\u2019; P&H HC acquits two teachers in assault case","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/20\/non-signing-of-witness-depositions-by-magistrate-fatal-to-prosecution-case-punjab-haryana-hc\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/20\/non-signing-of-witness-depositions-by-magistrate-fatal-to-prosecution-case-punjab-haryana-hc\/","name":"\u2018Non-signing of witness depositions by Magistrate, fatal to prosecution case\u2019; Punjab & Haryana HC | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/20\/non-signing-of-witness-depositions-by-magistrate-fatal-to-prosecution-case-punjab-haryana-hc\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/20\/non-signing-of-witness-depositions-by-magistrate-fatal-to-prosecution-case-punjab-haryana-hc\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Punjab-and-Haryana-High-Court.webp","datePublished":"2025-02-20T04:30:04+00:00","dateModified":"2025-02-26T04:14:44+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"Punjab & Haryana HC acquitted two teachers in assault case, reiterated non-signing of witness depositions by Magistrate was fatal to prosecution case.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/20\/non-signing-of-witness-depositions-by-magistrate-fatal-to-prosecution-case-punjab-haryana-hc\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/20\/non-signing-of-witness-depositions-by-magistrate-fatal-to-prosecution-case-punjab-haryana-hc\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/20\/non-signing-of-witness-depositions-by-magistrate-fatal-to-prosecution-case-punjab-haryana-hc\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Punjab-and-Haryana-High-Court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Punjab-and-Haryana-High-Court.webp","width":887,"height":591,"caption":"Punjab and Haryana High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/20\/non-signing-of-witness-depositions-by-magistrate-fatal-to-prosecution-case-punjab-haryana-hc\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"\u2018Non-signing of witness depositions by Magistrate is fatal to prosecution case\u2019; P&H HC acquits two teachers in assault case"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Punjab-and-Haryana-High-Court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":200635,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/26\/trial-court-empowered-to-summon-material-prosecution-witness-even-at-stage-of-defence-evidence-order-passed-under-section-311-crpc-upheld\/","url_meta":{"origin":341897,"position":0},"title":"Trial Court empowered to summon material prosecution witness even at stage of defence evidence; order passed under Section 311 CrPC upheld","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 26, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Punjab and Haryana High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Surinder Gupta, J. dismissed an appeal filed against order of the trial court whereby the application filed by the prosecution under Section 311 CrPC was allowed. The petitioner was facing the trial under Section 18 Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":216820,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/13\/jhar-hc-statement-made-in-earlier-depositions-cannot-be-used-to-bring-forth-charges-against-an-accused-facing-trial\/","url_meta":{"origin":341897,"position":1},"title":"Jhar HC | Statement made in earlier depositions cannot be used to bring forth charges against an accused facing trial","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 13, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Jharkhand High Court: Anil Kumar Choudhary, J. heard an interlocutory application filed under Section 378(4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 warranting a grant of special leave to present an acquittal appeal. Applicants herein were accused of entering into the complainant's house to threaten her to withdraw the case\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":216850,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/15\/ker-hc-s-258-crpc-can-be-invoked-only-in-peculiar-and-unusual-circumstances-when-no-prima-facie-case-is-made-out-against-the-accused\/","url_meta":{"origin":341897,"position":2},"title":"Ker HC | S. 258 CrPC can be invoked only in peculiar and unusual circumstances when no prima facie case is made out against the accused","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 15, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Kerala High Court: Raja Vijayaraghavan, J. set aside the order of discharge under Section 258 CrPC, passed by learned Judicial Magistrate First Class. These revision petitions were registered against the orders of discharge passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Kollam invoking the powers under Section 258 of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":279184,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/06\/delhi-high-court-sets-aside-conviction-19-years-after-the-verdict-over-lost-trial-courts-records\/","url_meta":{"origin":341897,"position":3},"title":"Delhi High Court sets aside conviction 19 years after the verdict over lost Trial Court’s records","author":"Editor","date":"December 6, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"The conviction and sentence awarded to a man in 2003 for culpable homicide not amounting to murder has been set aside by the Delhi High Court more than 19 years after the appeal was filed, due to the persistent inability to locate or reconstruct the trial court record.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/Delhi-High-Court-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":263333,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/09\/use-of-phrase-carnal-intercourse-considered-as-a-conscious-act-of-the-legislature-reflecting-the-clear-intent-to-engraft-an-offence-under-s-377-ipc\/","url_meta":{"origin":341897,"position":4},"title":"P&H HC | Use of phrase \u201ccarnal intercourse\u201d considered as a conscious act of the legislature reflecting the clear intent to engraft an offence under S. 377 IPC, conviction upheld","author":"Editor","date":"March 9, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Punjab and Haryana High Court: Vinod S. Bhardwaj, J. contemplated the revision petition filed by the accused\/ children in conflict with the law, challenging the dismissal of appeal by Additional District and Sessions Judge along with the order of conviction and sentence passed by the Juvenile Justice Board, for the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":253372,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/27\/deficiency-in-criminal-trial\/","url_meta":{"origin":341897,"position":5},"title":"Idiosyncrasies of colloquial terms, used for naming accused, could well be the difference between his conviction and acquittal: Supreme Court","author":"Editor","date":"August 27, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: A Division Bench of Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Hrishikesh Roy, JJ. took the liberty of disagreeing with one of the most famous lines penned down by the Bard of Avon (William Shakespeare), to suggest that \"Much indeed is in a name\". The Supreme Court reiterated the necessity of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/341897","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=341897"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/341897\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/314970"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=341897"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=341897"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=341897"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}