{"id":341630,"date":"2025-02-17T11:00:45","date_gmt":"2025-02-17T05:30:45","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=341630"},"modified":"2025-02-17T11:08:10","modified_gmt":"2025-02-17T05:38:10","slug":"2025-scc-vol-2-part-1","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/17\/2025-scc-vol-2-part-1\/","title":{"rendered":"2025 SCC Vol. 2 Part 1"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n

Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996<\/a> — Ss. 11<\/a>, 8<\/a> and 11<\/a> — Parties to arbitration proceedings — Arbitration agreement\/clause — If binding on non-signatory to agreement:<\/span> Law clarified on binding effect of arbitration agreement\/clause on non-signatory to agreement, [Ajay Madhusudan Patel v. Jyotrindra S. Patel<\/span>, (2025) 2 SCC 147<\/a>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973<\/a> — S. 125<\/a> — Applicability — Right to maintenance thereunder, of a divorced Muslim woman, despite enactment of the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986<\/a> — Effect of non obstante clause occurring in the 1986 Act:<\/span> A divorced Muslim woman can maintain a petition under S. 125 CrPC, despite enactment of the 1986 Act. Non obstante clause occurring in Ss. 3 and 4 of the 1986 Act cannot be deemed to override the rights so provided by S. 125 CrPC. Equivalent rights of maintenance under the secular provision of S. 125 CrPC, and the Personal law provision of S. 3 of the 1986 Act, parallelly exist in their distinct domains and jurisprudence. Thereby, leading to their harmonious construction and continued existence of the right to seek maintenance for a divorced Muslim woman under the provisions of CrPC despite enactment of the 1986 Act, Mohd. [Abdul Samad v. State of Telangana<\/span>, (2025) 2 SCC 49<\/a>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973<\/a> — S. 125<\/a> — Grant of maintenance — Divorced Muslim women — Jurisdiction of Family Court — Scope:<\/span> Issue relating to whether Family Court has jurisdiction to try application filed by a divorced Muslim woman for maintenance under the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986<\/a> and whether Family Court can convert the petition for maintenance under S. 125 CrPC to one under S. 3 or S. 4 of the 1986 Act and decide the same, pending adjudication before a larger Bench herein, [Rana Nahid v. Sahidul Haq Chisti<\/span>, (2025) 2 SCC 113<\/a>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Government Grants, Largesse, Public Property and Public Premises — Government Grants, Allotment, Transfer of Government\/Public property\/Largesse and Licences — Modes of Allocation of State Largesse, Government Grants, Government\/Public Property and Licences and Related issues – Mainly Public Law\/Administrative Law Principles —Cancellation\/Rectification\/Modification\/Revisional\/Competent Authority\/Denial of or Restriction on grant\/transfer\/allotment\/ Resumption\/Relief — Cancellation of allotment — When warranted — Arbitrary allotment of land:<\/span> Land is a precious material resource of community and therefore the least which is required from State is transparency in its distribution. Citing arbitrariness in allotment process as it was violative of procedure as well as eligibility criteria, Supreme Court set aside allotment of land made by State Government in favour of Cooperative Housing Society (MRCHS) to provide housing facilities to doctors working at Tata Memorial Hospital, Proposed Vaibhav Coop. [Housing Society Ltd. v. State of Maharashtra<\/span>, (2025) 2 SCC 128<\/a>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988<\/a> — S. 168<\/a> — Compensation — Determination:<\/span> Principles re-clarified relating to determination of compensation in case of death of homemaker in a car accident, [Arvind Kumar Pandey v. Girish Pandey<\/span>, (2025) 2 SCC 145<\/a>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Penal Code, 1860<\/a> — S. 306<\/a> r\/w Ss. 107<\/a> and 114<\/a> — Abetment of suicide:<\/span> Mere harassment, by itself, not sufficient to establish abetment of suicide, [Jayedeepsinh Pravinsinh Chavda v. State of Gujarat<\/span>, (2025) 2 SCC 116<\/a>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Service Law — Promotion — Criteria\/Eligibility — Promotion to post of DGM (Technical):<\/span> In case of requirement of possessing four years continuous service in feeder category of post of Manager (Technical), effect of gap in service rendered on deputation and regular service, explained, [NHAI v. G. Athipathi<\/span>, (2025) 2 SCC 39<\/a>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Service Law — Recruitment Process — Norms\/Principles\/Rules applicable — Change in rules in midst of recruitment process:<\/span> Change in rules in midst of recruitment process, not permissible; Placement in select list confers no indefeasible right to appointment, even if vacancies are available, [Tej Prakash Pathak v. High Court of Rajasthan<\/span>, (2025) 2 SCC 1<\/a>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Transfer of Property Act, 1882<\/a> — S. 41<\/a> — Requirements of applicability of — Clarified — Non-voidable transfer:<\/span> Ostensible owner’s consent is necessary for granting relief to buyer, [Duni Chand v. Vikram Singh<\/span>, (2025) 2 SCC 138<\/a>]<\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 \u2014 Ss. 11, 8 and 11 \u2014 Parties to arbitration proceedings \u2014 Arbitration agreement\/clause<\/i><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":341649,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[5,16],"tags":[78752,77400,10131,13671,78753,3374,59832,19791,8421,20711],"class_list":["post-341630","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casesreported","category-supremecourtcases","tag-1986-act","tag-2025-scc-vol","tag-arbitration-and-conciliation-act","tag-criminal-procedure-code","tag-divorced-muslim-women","tag-family_court","tag-government-grants","tag-motor-vehicles-act","tag-public-property","tag-s-125-crpc"],"yoast_head":"\n2025 SCC Vol. 2 Part 1 | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 \u2014 Ss. 11, 8 and 11 \u2014 Parties to arbitration proceedings \u2014 Arbitration agreement\/clause\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/17\/2025-scc-vol-2-part-1\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"2025 SCC Vol. 2 Part 1\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 \u2014 Ss. 11, 8 and 11 \u2014 Parties to arbitration proceedings \u2014 Arbitration agreement\/clause\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/17\/2025-scc-vol-2-part-1\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-02-17T05:30:45+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-02-17T05:38:10+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/2025-1.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"2025 SCC Vol. 2 Part 1\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/17\/2025-scc-vol-2-part-1\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/17\/2025-scc-vol-2-part-1\/\",\"name\":\"2025 SCC Vol. 2 Part 1 | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/17\/2025-scc-vol-2-part-1\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/17\/2025-scc-vol-2-part-1\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/2025-1.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-02-17T05:30:45+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-02-17T05:38:10+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"description\":\"Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 \u2014 Ss. 11, 8 and 11 \u2014 Parties to arbitration proceedings \u2014 Arbitration agreement\/clause\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/17\/2025-scc-vol-2-part-1\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/17\/2025-scc-vol-2-part-1\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/17\/2025-scc-vol-2-part-1\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/2025-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/2025-1.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"2025 SCC Vol. 2 Part 1\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/17\/2025-scc-vol-2-part-1\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"2025 SCC Vol. 2 Part 1\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"2025 SCC Vol. 2 Part 1 | SCC Times","description":"Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 \u2014 Ss. 11, 8 and 11 \u2014 Parties to arbitration proceedings \u2014 Arbitration agreement\/clause","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/17\/2025-scc-vol-2-part-1\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"2025 SCC Vol. 2 Part 1","og_description":"Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 \u2014 Ss. 11, 8 and 11 \u2014 Parties to arbitration proceedings \u2014 Arbitration agreement\/clause","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/17\/2025-scc-vol-2-part-1\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2025-02-17T05:30:45+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-02-17T05:38:10+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/2025-1.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"2025 SCC Vol. 2 Part 1","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/17\/2025-scc-vol-2-part-1\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/17\/2025-scc-vol-2-part-1\/","name":"2025 SCC Vol. 2 Part 1 | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/17\/2025-scc-vol-2-part-1\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/17\/2025-scc-vol-2-part-1\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/2025-1.webp","datePublished":"2025-02-17T05:30:45+00:00","dateModified":"2025-02-17T05:38:10+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"description":"Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 \u2014 Ss. 11, 8 and 11 \u2014 Parties to arbitration proceedings \u2014 Arbitration agreement\/clause","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/17\/2025-scc-vol-2-part-1\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/17\/2025-scc-vol-2-part-1\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/17\/2025-scc-vol-2-part-1\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/2025-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/2025-1.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"2025 SCC Vol. 2 Part 1"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/17\/2025-scc-vol-2-part-1\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"2025 SCC Vol. 2 Part 1"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/2025-1.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":273795,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/16\/2022-scc-vol-8-part-1\/","url_meta":{"origin":341630,"position":0},"title":"2022 SCC Vol. 8 Part 1","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 16, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 \u2014 Ss. 8, 11, 7, 2(1)(h), 16 and 45 \u2014 Non-signatory or non-party to arbitration agreement: Arbitration against, or by non-signatory or non-party to arbitration agreement, when may be invoked, discussed. The scope, ambit and validity of Group of Companies doctrine, explained. Doubting\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Cases Reported"","block_context":{"text":"Cases Reported","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casesreported\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"SCC Part","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/NEW-SCC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/NEW-SCC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/NEW-SCC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/NEW-SCC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/NEW-SCC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":273401,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/10\/arbitration-agreement-language-final-binding-arbitral-award-intention-valid-supreme-court-legal-research-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":341630,"position":1},"title":"Arbitration clause, even without the words \u201cfinal and binding\u201d, valid if the intention of the parties, to abide by arbitrator’s decision, is clear: Supreme Court","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"September 10, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"When Section 7 or any other provisions of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 do not stipulate any particular form or requirements, it would not be appropriate for a court to gratuitously add impediments and desist from upholding the validity of an arbitration agreement.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Arbitration-clause-even-without-the-words-final-and-binding-valid-if-the-intention-of-the-parties-to-abide-by-arbitrators-decision-is-clear-1.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Arbitration-clause-even-without-the-words-final-and-binding-valid-if-the-intention-of-the-parties-to-abide-by-arbitrators-decision-is-clear-1.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Arbitration-clause-even-without-the-words-final-and-binding-valid-if-the-intention-of-the-parties-to-abide-by-arbitrators-decision-is-clear-1.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Arbitration-clause-even-without-the-words-final-and-binding-valid-if-the-intention-of-the-parties-to-abide-by-arbitrators-decision-is-clear-1.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Arbitration-clause-even-without-the-words-final-and-binding-valid-if-the-intention-of-the-parties-to-abide-by-arbitrators-decision-is-clear-1.png?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":299153,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/14\/2023-scc-vol-7-part-1\/","url_meta":{"origin":341630,"position":2},"title":"2023 SCC Vol. 7 Part 1","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 14, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 \u2014 Ss. 8, 11 and 7: Non-payment or deficient payment of stamp duty on substantive contract comprising\/containing arbitration clause, or on standalone arbitration agreement, in cases where payment of stamp duty is mandatory, renders such arbitration agreement as non-existent pending payment of (the balance) stamp\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Cases Reported"","block_context":{"text":"Cases Reported","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casesreported\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"2023 scc vol. 7 part 1","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/2023-scc-vol.-7-part-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/2023-scc-vol.-7-part-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/2023-scc-vol.-7-part-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/2023-scc-vol.-7-part-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":286477,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/06\/non-signatory-parties-can-be-subjected-to-arbitration-in-accordance-with-doctrine-of-group-of-companies-delhi-high-court-legal-news-legal-research-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":341630,"position":3},"title":"Non-signatory parties can be subjected to arbitration in accordance with Doctrine of Group of Companies: Delhi High Court","author":"Editor","date":"March 6, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court held that non-signatory or third party could be subjected to arbitration proceedings without their prior consent. It was necessary to examine the touchstone of direct relationship of signatory parties to the arbitration agreement, forming part of a composite transaction.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-472.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-472.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-472.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-472.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":268453,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/15\/joinder-of-non-signatories-a-stepping-stone-towards-international-commercial-arbitrations\/","url_meta":{"origin":341630,"position":4},"title":"Joinder of Non-Signatories: A Stepping Stone Towards International Commercial Arbitrations","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"June 15, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"by Simran Pahwa\u2020 and Yasha Goyal\u2020\u2020","rel":"","context":"In "Op Eds"","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-252.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-252.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-252.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-252.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-252.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":299429,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/16\/unambiguous-intent-required-for-incorporation-arbitration-clause-by-reference-calcutta-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":341630,"position":5},"title":"Unambiguous intent required for incorporating Arbitration Clause by reference under Section 7(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996: Calcutta High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"August 16, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"In the instant matter, the primary issue was the incorporation of arbitration clauses from the Master Facility Agreement and Settlement Agreement and the maintainability of a composite reference.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/341630","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=341630"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/341630\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/341649"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=341630"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=341630"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=341630"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}