{"id":341321,"date":"2025-02-13T18:00:54","date_gmt":"2025-02-13T12:30:54","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=341321"},"modified":"2025-02-13T18:23:53","modified_gmt":"2025-02-13T12:53:53","slug":"sc-acquits-man-in-12-year-old-murder-case-upon-finding-glaring-defects-in-recovery-of-weapons","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/13\/sc-acquits-man-in-12-year-old-murder-case-upon-finding-glaring-defects-in-recovery-of-weapons\/","title":{"rendered":"SC acquits man in 12-year-old murder case upon finding glaring defects in recovery of weapons and preparation of seizure memos"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Supreme Court:<\/span> In a criminal appeal against Chhattisgarh High Court&#8217;s decision, whereby the appellant&#8217;s-accused appeal was dismissed and the Trial Court&#8217;s decision convicting the accused for offences under Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561607\" target=\"_blank\">302<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561485\" target=\"_blank\">201<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\">Penal Code, 1860<\/a> (&#8216;IPC&#8217;) was affirmed, the Division Bench of Sanjay Karol and <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Manmohan<\/span>*, JJ. allowed the appeal upon finding inconsistencies in the witness statements and glaring defects in the recoveries made by the police pursuant to the alleged disclosure made by the accused. Accordingly, the impugned judgments and the conviction of the accused under Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561607\" target=\"_blank\">302<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561485\" target=\"_blank\">201<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\">IPC<\/a> were hereby set aside.<\/p>\n<h3>Factual Matrix<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The prosecution&#8217;s case was that the deceased left his house on 29-11-2013 but did not return home and his father lodged a missing report. PW-1 informed the police on 01-12-2013 that a dead body was found floating in the pond of a stone quarry at Village. Subsequently, a First Information Report (&#8216;FIR&#8217;) was registered. During the investigation, it was found that the accused had borrowed money from the deceased and a dispute had arisen between them regarding refund of the borrowed amount. It was alleged that the accused along with co-accused (acquitted by the Trial Court) had taken the deceased in an auto to the place of the incident and assaulted the deceased with an iron pipe and battleaxe and thereby committed his murder and with intent to cause the disappearance of evidence smashed his head with stone and after removing his full pant tied a rope around his waist and threw the body in the water of quarry.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Trial acquitted the co-accused Tarachand Verma from all charges but convicted the accused vide for the offences under Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561607\" target=\"_blank\">302<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561485\" target=\"_blank\">201<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\">IPC<\/a>. Being aggrieved by the said judgment, the accused preferred a criminal appeal before the High Court. The High Court vide the impugned judgment dismissed the appeal and affirmed the conviction and sentence awarded by the Trial Court.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The accused argued that the Courts below failed to appreciate that the Memorandum of Statement of the accused under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001516768\" target=\"_blank\">27<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726934\" target=\"_blank\">Evidence Act<\/a> recorded by the Investigating Officer (&#8216;IO&#8217;).<\/p>\n<h3>Analysis and Decision<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court noted that the entire case of the prosecution was dependent on circumstantial evidence, as there was neither any eye-witness nor any judicially admissible confession. The Court reiterated that where the case rests entirely on circumstantial evidence, the chain of evidence must be so far complete, such that every hypothesis is excluded but the one proposed to be proved and such circumstances must show that the act has been done by the accused within all human probability.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court referred to <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Sharad Birdhichand Sarda<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">State of Maharashtra<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/FL6d5497\" target=\"_blank\">(1984) 4 SCC 116<\/a>, wherein, five essential principles referred to as the five golden principles, which must be satisfied for circumstantial evidence to conclusively establish the guilt of the accused were outlined.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Referring to <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Delhi Administration<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Bal Krishan<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/K9t6okKf\" target=\"_blank\">(1972) 4 SCC 659<\/a>, the Court said that Section 27 is an exception to Sections 25 and 26 and serves as a proviso to both Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001516766\" target=\"_blank\">25<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001516767\" target=\"_blank\">26<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726934\" target=\"_blank\">Evidence Act<\/a>. The Court reiterated that Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001516768\" target=\"_blank\">27<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726934\" target=\"_blank\">Evidence Act<\/a> lifts the ban, though partially, to the admissibility of confessions. The removal of the ban is not of such an extent that it can undo the object of Section 26. The Court stated that the statement whether confessional or not is allowed to be given in evidence but that portion only which distinctly relates to discovery of the fact is admissible. A discovery of a fact includes the object found, the place from which it is produced, and the knowledge of the accused as to its existence.<\/p>\n<p>The essential ingredients of Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001516768\" target=\"_blank\">27<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726934\" target=\"_blank\">Evidence Act<\/a>:<\/p>\n<ol style=\"list-style-type: lower-roman;\">\n<li>\n<p>The information given by the accused must led to the discovery of the fact which is the direct outcome of such information.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p>Only such portion of the information given as is distinctly connected with the said recovery is admissible against the accused.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The discovery of the facts must relate to the commission of such offence.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court noted that the prosecution recovered the weapon of assault (stone as well as the gandasa) and gold chains belonging to the deceased, based on the statement of the accused while in custody. Regarding the question of whether evidence relating to recovery was sufficient to fasten guilt on the accused, the Court relied on <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Bodhraj Alias Bodha<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">State of Jammu &amp; Kashmir<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/G8u2v6nD\" target=\"_blank\">(2002) 8 SCC 45<\/a>, wherein the Court laid down that <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">the exact information given by the accused while in custody which led to recovery of the articles has to be proved; Mere statement that the accused led the police and the witnesses to the place where he had concealed the articles is not indicative of the information given.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Relying upon <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Varun Chaudhary<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">State of Rajasthan<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/20fs00SP\" target=\"_blank\">(2011) 12 SCC 545<\/a> and <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Mustkeem<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">State of Rajasthan<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/0l6DqM27\" target=\"_blank\">(2011) 11 SCC 724<\/a>, the Court noted that it was held that if the recovery memos had been prepared in the police station itself or signed by the panch witnesses in the police station, the same would lose their sanctity and cannot be relied upon by the Court to support the conviction.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In the present case, the Court noted that the prosecution produced two as the panch witnesses to prove the recovery pursuant to the disclosure made by the accused. The Court noted that one of them had deposed that when the accused was questioned in his presence, the accused stated that he could recover the stone, axe, and pipe. However, during his cross-examination, he admitted that he along with another witness stayed in the police station for about five minutes during which period, the police made them sign many papers. The said witness further admitted that the memorandum of statement of the accused was signed on the instructions of the police, without reading or understanding the contents of the said document. The Court also pointed out that there were glaring inconsistencies with respect to how the gold chains were recovered from the house of the accused and further, the presence of the accused at the time of the said recovery was itself doubtful.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Further, the Court said that the testimonies of witnesses revealed that the two gold chains did not bear any distinguishable mark or properties and no identification mark or properties were disclosed by the deceased&#8217;s wife before identification proceedings.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Therefore, the Court held that the Courts below were not justified in disregarding the glaring inconsistencies for the recoveries made by the police pursuant to the alleged disclosure made by the accused. Consequently, the manner of recovery and preparation of seizure memos raised grave doubts about the version of disclosure and recovery put forth by the prosecution. Thus, the Court opined that the prosecution failed to prove the chain of circumstances leading to the guilt of the accused, beyond reasonable doubt.<\/p>\n<p><!--\n\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Raja Khan v. State of Chattisgarh, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/0Xe1l0G0\" target=\"_blank\">2025 SCC OnLine SC 260<\/a>, decided on: 07-02-2025<\/span>]<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000080;\">*Judgment Authored by: Justice Manmohan<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n<hr\/>\n\n\n\n\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For Appellant:<\/span> Ashutosh Dubey, AOR, Santosh Chauriha, Adv., Saubhagya Chauriha, Adv., Rajshri A. Dubey, Adv., Abhishek Chauhan, Adv., H.b. Dubey, Adv., Shohaib Alvi, Adv., Ruchika Sharma, Adv., Amit P Shahi, Adv., Amit Kumar, Adv., Mayur Khandelwal, Adv., Rohan Sharma, Adv.,<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For Respondent:<\/span> Prerna Dhall, Adv., Shivam Ganeshia, Adv., M N Gopinadh, Adv. Karishma Rajput, Adv., Akansha Singh, Adv., Prashant Singh, AOR<\/p>\n\n--><\/p>\n<div style=\"text-overflow: ellipsis; background-color: #92A8D1; text-align:justify; clear:both; text-size-adjust: auto; overflow: auto;\">\n<p style=\"font-size: 18pt; margin-top: 5px; text-align: center;\">CASE DETAILS<\/p>\n<table width=\"100%\" style=\"word-wrap: break-word; border-collapse:collapse; table-layout: fixed; margin-top: 10px;\">\n<colgroup>\n<col width=\"41%\"\/>\n<col width=\"59%\"\/>\n<\/colgroup>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td valign=\"top\">\n<p><span style=\"color: #D4E4F7; font-weight: bold;\">Citation:<\/span><br \/> <span style=\"color: #D4E4F7; font-size: 10pt;\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/0Xe1l0G0\" target=\"_blank\">2025 SCC OnLine SC 260<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #D4E4F7; font-weight: bold;\">Appellants&#160;:<\/span><br \/> Raja Khan<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #D4E4F7; font-weight: bold;\">Respondents&#160;:<\/span><br \/> State of Chattisgarh<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td valign=\"top\">\n<p style=\"color: #D4E4F7; font-weight: bold;\">Advocates who appeared in this case<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #D4E4F7; font-weight: bold;\">For Petitioner(s):<\/span><br \/> Ashutosh Dubey, AOR, Santosh Chauriha, Adv., Saubhagya Chauriha, Adv., Rajshri A. Dubey, Adv., Abhishek Chauhan, Adv., H.b. Dubey, Adv., Shohaib Alvi, Adv., Ruchika Sharma, Adv., Amit P Shahi, Adv., Amit Kumar, Adv., Mayur Khandelwal, Adv., Rohan Sharma, Adv.,<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #D4E4F7; font-weight: bold;\">For Respondent(s):<\/span><br \/> Prerna Dhall, Adv., Shivam Ganeshia, Adv., M N Gopinadh, Adv. Karishma Rajput, Adv., Akansha Singh, Adv., Prashant Singh, AOR<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p style=\"font-size: 12pt; margin-top: -20px; margin-left: 5px;\"><span style=\"color: #D4E4F7; font-weight: bold;\">CORAM&#160;:<\/span><\/p>\n<div id=\"banner\" style=\"overflow: hidden; display: flex; justify-content: space-between; padding-left: 3%;\">\n<div class=\"\" style=\"max-width: 100%; max-height: 100%; font-size: 9pt; text-align: center;\">\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" height=\"100px\" width=\"100px\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scobserver.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/Sanjay-Karol-Circle.png\" alt=\"Sanjay Karol, J.\" style=\"border-radius: 50%;\"><br \/><span style=\"color: black !important;\">Sanjay Karol, J.<\/span><\/img><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"\" style=\"max-width: 100%; max-height: 100%; font-size: 9pt; text-align: center;\">\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/12\/05\/justice-manmohan-takes-oath-sc-judge-legal-news\/\" target=\"_blank\"><img decoding=\"async\" height=\"100px\" width=\"100px\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scobserver.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/Justice-Manmohan-Circle.png\" alt=\"Manmohan, J.\" style=\"border-radius: 50%; border:2px solid #FF5733; padding: 1px;\"><br \/><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Manmohan, J.<\/span><\/img><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"\" style=\"max-width: 100%; max-height: 100%;\"><\/div>\n<div class=\"\" style=\"max-width: 100%; max-height: 100%;\"><\/div>\n<div class=\"\" style=\"max-width: 100%; max-height: 100%;\"><\/div>\n<div class=\"\" style=\"max-width: 100%; max-height: 100%;\"><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Penal Code, 1860 &nbsp; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1158\" target=\"_blank\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1158\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"penal code, 1860\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294601\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-768x511.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-440x293.jpg 440w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-650x433.jpg 650w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860.jpg 886w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-60x40.jpg 60w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">&#8220;If the recovery memos had been prepared in the police station itself or signed by the panch witnesses in the police station, the same would lose their sanctity and cannot be relied upon by the Court to support the conviction.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67517,"featured_media":341329,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,9],"tags":[76343,68715,55015,78644,30765,78645,5363],"class_list":["post-341321","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-supremecourt","tag-acquittal-in-murder-case","tag-justice-manmohan","tag-justice-sanjay-karol","tag-recovery-of-weapons","tag-section-302-ipc","tag-seizure-memos","tag-supreme-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>SC acquits man in 12-year-old murder case upon finding glaring defects in recovery of weapons | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"SC acquits man in 12-year-old murder case upon finding glaring defects in recovery of weapons pursuant to disclosure by accused and in preparation of seizure memos\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/13\/sc-acquits-man-in-12-year-old-murder-case-upon-finding-glaring-defects-in-recovery-of-weapons\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"SC acquits man in 12-year-old murder case upon finding glaring defects in recovery of weapons and preparation of seizure memos\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"SC acquits man in 12-year-old murder case upon finding glaring defects in recovery of weapons pursuant to disclosure by accused and in preparation of seizure memos\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/13\/sc-acquits-man-in-12-year-old-murder-case-upon-finding-glaring-defects-in-recovery-of-weapons\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-02-13T12:30:54+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-02-13T12:53:53+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/murder-3.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"SC acquits man in 12-year-old murder case upon finding glaring defects in recovery of weapons and preparation of seizure memos\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/13\/sc-acquits-man-in-12-year-old-murder-case-upon-finding-glaring-defects-in-recovery-of-weapons\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/13\/sc-acquits-man-in-12-year-old-murder-case-upon-finding-glaring-defects-in-recovery-of-weapons\/\",\"name\":\"SC acquits man in 12-year-old murder case upon finding glaring defects in recovery of weapons | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/13\/sc-acquits-man-in-12-year-old-murder-case-upon-finding-glaring-defects-in-recovery-of-weapons\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/13\/sc-acquits-man-in-12-year-old-murder-case-upon-finding-glaring-defects-in-recovery-of-weapons\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/murder-3.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-02-13T12:30:54+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-02-13T12:53:53+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84913f82186a8dea042dc300d5751624\"},\"description\":\"SC acquits man in 12-year-old murder case upon finding glaring defects in recovery of weapons pursuant to disclosure by accused and in preparation of seizure memos\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/13\/sc-acquits-man-in-12-year-old-murder-case-upon-finding-glaring-defects-in-recovery-of-weapons\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/13\/sc-acquits-man-in-12-year-old-murder-case-upon-finding-glaring-defects-in-recovery-of-weapons\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/13\/sc-acquits-man-in-12-year-old-murder-case-upon-finding-glaring-defects-in-recovery-of-weapons\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/murder-3.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/murder-3.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"Acquittal in murder case\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/13\/sc-acquits-man-in-12-year-old-murder-case-upon-finding-glaring-defects-in-recovery-of-weapons\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"SC acquits man in 12-year-old murder case upon finding glaring defects in recovery of weapons and preparation of seizure memos\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84913f82186a8dea042dc300d5751624\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d822f35f9fcd11386aa47345cde7945e45a64da7205eebe9784f21d0cd223603?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d822f35f9fcd11386aa47345cde7945e45a64da7205eebe9784f21d0cd223603?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc-online-editor\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"SC acquits man in 12-year-old murder case upon finding glaring defects in recovery of weapons | SCC Times","description":"SC acquits man in 12-year-old murder case upon finding glaring defects in recovery of weapons pursuant to disclosure by accused and in preparation of seizure memos","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/13\/sc-acquits-man-in-12-year-old-murder-case-upon-finding-glaring-defects-in-recovery-of-weapons\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"SC acquits man in 12-year-old murder case upon finding glaring defects in recovery of weapons and preparation of seizure memos","og_description":"SC acquits man in 12-year-old murder case upon finding glaring defects in recovery of weapons pursuant to disclosure by accused and in preparation of seizure memos","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/13\/sc-acquits-man-in-12-year-old-murder-case-upon-finding-glaring-defects-in-recovery-of-weapons\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2025-02-13T12:30:54+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-02-13T12:53:53+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/murder-3.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"SC acquits man in 12-year-old murder case upon finding glaring defects in recovery of weapons and preparation of seizure memos","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/13\/sc-acquits-man-in-12-year-old-murder-case-upon-finding-glaring-defects-in-recovery-of-weapons\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/13\/sc-acquits-man-in-12-year-old-murder-case-upon-finding-glaring-defects-in-recovery-of-weapons\/","name":"SC acquits man in 12-year-old murder case upon finding glaring defects in recovery of weapons | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/13\/sc-acquits-man-in-12-year-old-murder-case-upon-finding-glaring-defects-in-recovery-of-weapons\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/13\/sc-acquits-man-in-12-year-old-murder-case-upon-finding-glaring-defects-in-recovery-of-weapons\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/murder-3.webp","datePublished":"2025-02-13T12:30:54+00:00","dateModified":"2025-02-13T12:53:53+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84913f82186a8dea042dc300d5751624"},"description":"SC acquits man in 12-year-old murder case upon finding glaring defects in recovery of weapons pursuant to disclosure by accused and in preparation of seizure memos","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/13\/sc-acquits-man-in-12-year-old-murder-case-upon-finding-glaring-defects-in-recovery-of-weapons\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/13\/sc-acquits-man-in-12-year-old-murder-case-upon-finding-glaring-defects-in-recovery-of-weapons\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/13\/sc-acquits-man-in-12-year-old-murder-case-upon-finding-glaring-defects-in-recovery-of-weapons\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/murder-3.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/murder-3.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"Acquittal in murder case"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/13\/sc-acquits-man-in-12-year-old-murder-case-upon-finding-glaring-defects-in-recovery-of-weapons\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"SC acquits man in 12-year-old murder case upon finding glaring defects in recovery of weapons and preparation of seizure memos"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84913f82186a8dea042dc300d5751624","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d822f35f9fcd11386aa47345cde7945e45a64da7205eebe9784f21d0cd223603?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d822f35f9fcd11386aa47345cde7945e45a64da7205eebe9784f21d0cd223603?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc-online-editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/murder-3.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":287201,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/18\/supreme-court-remarks-judgment-by-chhattisgarh-high-court-as-sketchy-acquits-murder-convict-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":341321,"position":0},"title":"Supreme Court finds Chhattisgarh High Court&#8217;s judgment \u2018Sketchy\u2019; Acquits murder convict in a 20-year-old case","author":"Apoorva","date":"March 18, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court said that the cherished principles or golden threads of proof beyond reasonable doubt which runs through the web of our law should not be stretched morbidly which was done by the Courts below.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Sketchy","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-783.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-783.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-783.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-783.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":313440,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/08\/know-why-supreme-court-modified-murder-conviction-section-304-part-2-ipc\/","url_meta":{"origin":341321,"position":1},"title":"Know why Supreme Court modified murder conviction to Section 304 part 2 of IPC for one out of four accused","author":"Ridhi","date":"February 8, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"While convicting the said accused under Section 304 Part 2 of IPC, the Court sentenced him to undergo imprisonment for 10 years.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Section 304 part 2 IPC","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Section-304-part-2-IPC.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Section-304-part-2-IPC.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Section-304-part-2-IPC.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Section-304-part-2-IPC.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":365291,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/31\/sc-unlawful-assembly-vicarious-liability-section-149-conviction-murder-case\/","url_meta":{"origin":341321,"position":2},"title":"&#8216;Members of unlawful assembly vicariously liable once common object and participation are proved, regardless of individual acts&#8217;; SC upholds conviction of 3 in murder case","author":"Apoorva","date":"October 31, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe Trial Court overlooked the consistent and corroborated testimony of injured eyewitnesses and failed to appreciate the legal effect of the active participation of the appellants as members of an unlawful assembly. The High Court, in reversing the acquittal, has given cogent and well-reasoned findings based on a proper appraisal\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"unlawful assembly","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/unlawful-assembly.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/unlawful-assembly.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/unlawful-assembly.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/unlawful-assembly.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":344498,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/28\/sc-converts-nephew-conviction-from-under-s-302-to-s-304-part-i-ipc-accused-killing-uncle\/","url_meta":{"origin":341321,"position":3},"title":"\u2018If intention was to kill, there was no reason not to use sharp side of axe\u2019; SC converts nephew\u2019s conviction from under S. 302 to S. 304 Part I of IPC in uncle\u2019s killing","author":"Editor","date":"March 28, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cMerely because the witnesses are relatives of the deceased, and as such are interested witnesses, that alone cannot be a ground to discard their testimony. The only requirement is that the testimony of such witnesses has to be scrutinized with greater caution and circumspection.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Convert conviction from S. 302","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/Convert-conviction-from-S.-302.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/Convert-conviction-from-S.-302.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/Convert-conviction-from-S.-302.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/Convert-conviction-from-S.-302.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":196710,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/06\/finding-of-acquittal-is-not-to-be-disturbed-if-there-are-two-views-possible-arising-out-of-the-same-facts\/","url_meta":{"origin":341321,"position":4},"title":"Finding of acquittal is not to be disturbed if there are two views possible arising out of the same facts","author":"Saba","date":"June 6, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: The Bench comprising of M.M. Shantanagoudar, J., delivering a judgment for himself and L. Nageswara Rao, J., disposed of a criminal appeal by modifying the conviction of the appellant by setting aside his conviction under Section 302 IPC while upholding the conviction under Section 326. The Appellant (Accused\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":205896,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/29\/conviction-under-section-302-ipc-upheld-on-finding-incident-to-be-not-at-spur-of-moment\/","url_meta":{"origin":341321,"position":5},"title":"Conviction under Section 302 IPC upheld on finding incident to be not at spur of moment","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 29, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: The 3-Judge Bench comprising of N.V. Ramana, Mohan M. Shantanagoudar and M.R. Shah, JJ. dismissed an appeal arising out of Punjab and Haryana High Court judgment, while altering the conviction and sentence awarded under Sections 304 Part II IPC to that of under Section 302 IPC. The factual\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/341321","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67517"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=341321"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/341321\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/341329"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=341321"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=341321"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=341321"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}