{"id":340598,"date":"2025-02-06T15:00:03","date_gmt":"2025-02-06T09:30:03","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=340598"},"modified":"2025-02-06T14:09:32","modified_gmt":"2025-02-06T08:39:32","slug":"lost-in-recommendations-ensuring-accountability-in-disability-rights-enforcement","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/06\/lost-in-recommendations-ensuring-accountability-in-disability-rights-enforcement\/","title":{"rendered":"Lost in Recommendations: Ensuring Accountability in Disability Rights Enforcement"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

I<\/span>n September 2024, the Delhi High Court ruled that the orders issued by the Chief Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities are not legally binding in nature, but merely recommendatory.1<\/sup><\/a> This decision came in a case where the Chief Commissioner’s interim order, which stayed the transfer of an employee with a disability, was deemed invalid. The Court explained that the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016<\/a>2<\/sup><\/a> (RPWDA<\/span>), which establishes the Chief Commissioner’s authority, does not empower the Chief Commissioner to issue binding or adjudicatory orders. While this interpretation may not be inconsistent with the RPWDA<\/span>, it raises significant concerns about the system’s effectiveness. The question remains how can the complaints of persons with disabilities lead to meaningful resolutions if the Commissioner’s orders lack binding authority?<\/p>\n

Role of Commissioners for Persons with Disabilities<\/h2>\n

Before addressing this concern, it is crucial to understand the role of the Commissioners and their significance in advancing disability rights. The RPWDA<\/span>, as the primary legislation safeguarding the rights of persons with disabilities in India, offers a bouquet of rights across various spheres, including equal treatment, non-discrimination, inclusive education, accessibility, employment, healthcare, community life, among others. While the legislation promises extensive protections, these rights hold real value only when they are effectively implemented and upheld. To ensure this, the RPWDA<\/span>, under Sections 75 and 803<\/sup><\/a>, establishes a framework with Chief Commissioners for Persons with Disabilities at the Centre and State Commissioners for Persons with Disabilities in States, to oversee the implementation of RPWDA<\/span> and addressing complaints of rights violations.<\/p>\n

Filing complaints with the Commissioners is a straightforward process that can be initiated by persons with disabilities or by others on their behalf. After hearing both the complainant and respondent, if the complaint is found to have merit, the Commissioner issues an order in the form of recommendations to the respondent, urging them to take corrective action to safeguard the rights that have been infringed upon.<\/p>\n

Over the years, Commissioners have issued several significant orders that have resulted in tangible changes at the ground level. A perusal of the compendium of notable orders of the Commissioners published by the Department of Empowerment of Persons with Disabilities highlights how these orders have upheld the rights of persons with disabilities across various areas, including equal employment opportunities, inclusive education, discrimination, accessibility rights, healthcare, and banking and insurance, among others.4<\/sup><\/a><\/span> For instance, in 2022, the Delhi State Commissioner addressed multiple complaints regarding children with disabilities who were denied school admissions; following the Commissioner’s intervention, these children were granted admission.5<\/sup><\/a> More recently, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) issued a directive to payment system operators to enhance accessibility in digital payments for persons with disabilities6<\/sup><\/a>, a move that came just four months after the Chief Commissioner made a similar recommendation to the RBI.7<\/sup><\/a><\/p>\n

Inadequate and ambiguous compliance mechanisms<\/h2>\n

While there is no denying that the orders issued by the Commissioners have been instrumental in safeguarding the rights of persons with disabilities, challenges arise when these orders are not complied with. The RPWDA<\/span> provides a limited compliance mechanism under Sections 76 and 818<\/sup><\/a>, which require the respondent receiving the recommendation to inform the Commissioner within three months about the action taken or provide reasons for non-compliance. However, these provisions do not provide sufficient clarity on whether the Commissioner’s orders are binding or not. The absence of such explicit provisions in the law leaves room for the inference that the respondent may choose to simply reject the recommendation, thereby dismissing the rights of persons with disabilities with impunity.<\/p>\n

On this subject, there are two pertinent rulings by the Delhi High Court: In 2005, the Court acknowledged that while the Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995<\/a>9<\/sup><\/a> (now replaced by the RPWDA<\/span>) does not specifically state that the Chief Commissioner’s orders are binding, it offers enough indication that the Chief Commissioner’s role is not purely recommendatory.10<\/sup><\/a> The Court further added that in the absence of any contrary provision, it can be inferred that the Chief Commissioner has adjudicatory powers. However, in the aforementioned 2024 ruling11<\/sup><\/a>, the same Court noted that the Chief Commissioner’s role is primarily investigatory and recommendatory, focused on ensuring compliance with the rights and protections under the law, rather than adjudication.<\/p>\n

While the Court in the 2024 ruling12<\/sup><\/a> arrived at this conclusion based on several judicial precedents laid down by the Supreme Court on the issue, it failed to clarify how compliance with the orders of the Commissioners will be “ensured” when no effective legal mechanism exists for enforcement. The import of this ruling is that for any person with disability seeking to enforce their rights under the RPWDA<\/span>, the initial step is to approach the Commissioner for a recommendation against the respondent. However, if the respondent rejects the recommendation, the aggrieved person must ultimately turn to the courts, filing a writ petition to enforce their rights. Summarily, the long-drawn process of filing a complaint with the Commissioner would be an exercise in vain, wasting the complainant’s time, resources and efforts.<\/p>\n

Potential pathways for enhancing compliance<\/h2>\n

In light of the concerns stemming from the 2024 Delhi High Court ruling13<\/sup><\/a>, an appeal has been filed in the same Court to delineate the scope of powers of the Chief Commissioner. Parallelly, the Supreme Court has also admitted a public interest litigation regarding the non-compliance and neglect of recommendations made by the Commissioners in cases involving violations of the RPWDA<\/span>.14<\/sup><\/a> This presents a crucial opportunity for the courts to define the scope of the Commissioner’s authority and clarify the nature of their orders.<\/p>\n

Further, to ensure that after filing complaints, persons with disabilities are not left stranded due to inaction from both Commissioners and respondents, the courts could also urge the Central Government to establish clearer provisions for enforcing Commissioner’s orders. This could include an effective legal mechanism that ensures accountability for all parties involved until the issue is fully resolved.<\/p>\n

Such mechanism could include expanding the powers of Commissioners to hold off disposal of cases until they receive confirmation of compliance or valid reasons for non-compliance, ensuring that respondents remain accountable under the Commissioner’s inquiry until they justify their actions. In cases of non-responsiveness, the Commissioner’s office could take a more active role by issuing regular reminders, conducting site visits, and sending official letters to follow up. If the Commissioner remains unsatisfied with the response, they could then guide the complainant to approach the relevant High Court through a writ petition for enforcement, leading to the final adjudication of the matter. A precedent for this can be found in National Federation of the Blind<\/span> v. State (NCT of Delhi)<\/span>, where the Delhi High Court upheld the Delhi State Commissioner’s order and declared that non-compliance would be treated as contempt of court.15<\/sup><\/a><\/p>\n

Such measures, which may require broadening of Commissioner’s power through an amendment in the RPWDA<\/span>, could significantly improve compliance with their orders and ensure that the Commissioners function as a facilitator, rather than an isolated intermediary, in the process of securing justice through the courts. It is hoped the courts will take proactive steps this time to put an end to the longstanding issue of non-compliance with Commissioner’s orders, paving the way for persons with disabilities to get substantive resolutions when their rights are violated.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n\n

\u2020Research fellow, Disability Inclusion and Access, Vidhi Centre for Legal Policy.<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n

1.<\/a> National Power Training Institute<\/span> v. Commr.<\/span>, 2024 SCC OnLine Del 6185<\/a>.<\/p>\n

2.<\/a> Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016<\/a>.<\/p>\n

3.<\/a> Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016<\/a>, Ss. 75<\/a> & 80<\/a>.<\/p>\n

4.<\/a> Department of Empowerment of Persons with Disabilities, Pathways to Access, Compilation of Summaries of Notable Orders passed by Chief Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities & State Commissioners for Persons with Disabilities (2023).<\/p>\n

5.<\/a> Annual Report 2022-2023, State Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities, GNCTD.<\/p>\n

6.<\/a> Reserve Bank of India (RBI\/2024-25\/83 CO. DPSS. POLC. No. S-708\/02-12-004\/2024-25) Facilitating Accessibility to Digital Payment Systems for Persons with Disabilities — Guidelines (11-10-2024)<\/a>.<\/p>\n

7.<\/a> Rahul Bajaj<\/span> v. Radisson Blue Hotel<\/span>, Case No. 13729\/1101\/2023 (Chief Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities (Divyangjan) Court).<\/p>\n

8.<\/a> Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016<\/a>, Ss. 76<\/a> & 81<\/a>.<\/p>\n

9.<\/a> Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995<\/a>.<\/p>\n

10.<\/a> Dilbagh Singh<\/span> v. DTC<\/span>, 2005 SCC OnLine Del 821<\/a>.<\/p>\n

11.<\/a> National Power Training Institute<\/span> case<\/span>, 2024 SCC OnLine Del 6185<\/a>.<\/p>\n

12.<\/a> National Power Training Institute case<\/span>, 2024 SCC OnLine Del 6185<\/a>.<\/p>\n

13.<\/a> National Power Training Institute case<\/span>, 2024 SCC OnLine Del 6185<\/a>.<\/p>\n

14.<\/a> Satendra Singh<\/span> v. Union of India<\/span>, WP (C) No. 636\/2024. (No order made yet)<\/p>\n

15.<\/a> 2023 SCC OnLine Del 1403<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

by Somya Jain\u2020<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":340603,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[42503,1191],"tags":[78345,78344,78342,78341,78340,16611,78343],"class_list":["post-340598","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-legal-analysis","category-op-ed","tag-centre-and-state-commissioners-for-persons-with-disabilities","tag-chief-commissioners-for-persons-with-disabilities","tag-disability-rights-enforcement","tag-ensuring-accountability","tag-lost-in-recommendations","tag-rights-of-persons-with-disabilities-act","tag-rpwda"],"yoast_head":"\nLost in Recommendations: Ensuring Accountability in Disability Rights Enforcement | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"In September 2024, the Delhi High Court ruled that the orders issued by the Chief Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/06\/lost-in-recommendations-ensuring-accountability-in-disability-rights-enforcement\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Lost in Recommendations: Ensuring Accountability in Disability Rights Enforcement\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"In September 2024, the Delhi High Court ruled that the orders issued by the Chief Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/06\/lost-in-recommendations-ensuring-accountability-in-disability-rights-enforcement\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-02-06T09:30:03+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/Disability-Rights-Enforcement.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Lost in Recommendations: Ensuring Accountability in Disability Rights Enforcement\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/06\/lost-in-recommendations-ensuring-accountability-in-disability-rights-enforcement\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/06\/lost-in-recommendations-ensuring-accountability-in-disability-rights-enforcement\/\",\"name\":\"Lost in Recommendations: Ensuring Accountability in Disability Rights Enforcement | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/06\/lost-in-recommendations-ensuring-accountability-in-disability-rights-enforcement\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/06\/lost-in-recommendations-ensuring-accountability-in-disability-rights-enforcement\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/Disability-Rights-Enforcement.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-02-06T09:30:03+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"description\":\"In September 2024, the Delhi High Court ruled that the orders issued by the Chief Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/06\/lost-in-recommendations-ensuring-accountability-in-disability-rights-enforcement\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/06\/lost-in-recommendations-ensuring-accountability-in-disability-rights-enforcement\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/06\/lost-in-recommendations-ensuring-accountability-in-disability-rights-enforcement\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/Disability-Rights-Enforcement.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/Disability-Rights-Enforcement.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"Disability Rights Enforcement\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/06\/lost-in-recommendations-ensuring-accountability-in-disability-rights-enforcement\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Lost in Recommendations: Ensuring Accountability in Disability Rights Enforcement\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Lost in Recommendations: Ensuring Accountability in Disability Rights Enforcement | SCC Times","description":"In September 2024, the Delhi High Court ruled that the orders issued by the Chief Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/06\/lost-in-recommendations-ensuring-accountability-in-disability-rights-enforcement\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Lost in Recommendations: Ensuring Accountability in Disability Rights Enforcement","og_description":"In September 2024, the Delhi High Court ruled that the orders issued by the Chief Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/06\/lost-in-recommendations-ensuring-accountability-in-disability-rights-enforcement\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2025-02-06T09:30:03+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/Disability-Rights-Enforcement.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Lost in Recommendations: Ensuring Accountability in Disability Rights Enforcement","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/06\/lost-in-recommendations-ensuring-accountability-in-disability-rights-enforcement\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/06\/lost-in-recommendations-ensuring-accountability-in-disability-rights-enforcement\/","name":"Lost in Recommendations: Ensuring Accountability in Disability Rights Enforcement | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/06\/lost-in-recommendations-ensuring-accountability-in-disability-rights-enforcement\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/06\/lost-in-recommendations-ensuring-accountability-in-disability-rights-enforcement\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/Disability-Rights-Enforcement.webp","datePublished":"2025-02-06T09:30:03+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"description":"In September 2024, the Delhi High Court ruled that the orders issued by the Chief Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/06\/lost-in-recommendations-ensuring-accountability-in-disability-rights-enforcement\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/06\/lost-in-recommendations-ensuring-accountability-in-disability-rights-enforcement\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/06\/lost-in-recommendations-ensuring-accountability-in-disability-rights-enforcement\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/Disability-Rights-Enforcement.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/Disability-Rights-Enforcement.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"Disability Rights Enforcement"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/06\/lost-in-recommendations-ensuring-accountability-in-disability-rights-enforcement\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Lost in Recommendations: Ensuring Accountability in Disability Rights Enforcement"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/Disability-Rights-Enforcement.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":211178,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/02\/cabinet-approves-creation-of-two-posts-of-commissioner-for-persons-with-disabilities-in-the-central-government\/","url_meta":{"origin":340598,"position":0},"title":"Cabinet approves Creation of two posts of Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities in the Central Government","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"March 2, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"The Union Cabinet chaired by the Prime Minister Narendra Modi has approved the proposal for Creation of two (2) posts of Commissioners in the Office of the Chief Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities (CCPD), in terms of provisions of The Rights of Persons with Disabilities (RPwD) Act, 2016. Out of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Cabinet Decisions"","block_context":{"text":"Cabinet Decisions","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/legislationupdates\/cabinet_decisions\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/CABINET-SECRETARIAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/CABINET-SECRETARIAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/CABINET-SECRETARIAT.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/CABINET-SECRETARIAT.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/CABINET-SECRETARIAT.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":93311,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/17\/rights-of-persons-with-disabilities-bill-2016-passed-by-parliament\/","url_meta":{"origin":340598,"position":1},"title":"Rights of Persons with Disabilities Bill, 2016 passed by Parliament","author":"Saba","date":"December 17, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"The Lok Sabha on 16.12.2016 passed \"The Rights of Persons with Disabilities Bill - 2016\". The Bill will replace the existing PwD Act, 1995, which was enacted 21 years back. The Rajya Sabha has already passed the Bill on 14.12.2016. 2. The salient features of the Bill are: i. Disability\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Hot Off The Press"","block_context":{"text":"Hot Off The Press","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/hot_off_the_press\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/parliamentSM.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/parliamentSM.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/parliamentSM.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/parliamentSM.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/parliamentSM.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/parliamentSM.jpg?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":90121,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/04\/rights-of-persons-with-disabilities-bill-provides-for-penalties-for-offences-committed-against-persons-with-disabilities\/","url_meta":{"origin":340598,"position":2},"title":"Rights of Persons With Disabilities Bill provides for penalties for offences committed against Persons With Disabilities","author":"Saba","date":"December 4, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Shri Thaawarchand Gehlot, Minister of Social Justice and Empowerment has said that in the \u201cRights of Persons With Disabilities (RPWD) Bill, the Disability has been defined based on an evolving and dynamic concept and the types of disabilities have been increased from existing 7 to 21 and the Central Government\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Legislation Updates"","block_context":{"text":"Legislation Updates","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/legislationupdates\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/DSC_4762-e1474523869607.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/DSC_4762-e1474523869607.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/DSC_4762-e1474523869607.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/DSC_4762-e1474523869607.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/DSC_4762-e1474523869607.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":344380,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/26\/selection-process-prioritising-educational-qualification-over-disability-severity-contradicts-rights-of-persons-with-disabilities-act-mp-hc-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":340598,"position":3},"title":"Selection process, prioritising educational qualification over disability severity, contradicts spirit of Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act: MP High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"March 26, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court noted that the circular dated 03-07-2018 mandated that preference should be given to persons with higher disabilities unless their condition prevents them from performing the job.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madhya Pradesh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":326074,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/08\/sc-guidelines-on-portrayal-of-persons-with-disabilities-visual-media-films\/","url_meta":{"origin":340598,"position":4},"title":"Supreme Court issues guidelines on portrayal of persons with disabilities in visual media, films","author":"Editor","date":"July 8, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cWords cultivate institutional discrimination. Terms such as \u201ccripple\u201d and \u201cspastic\u201d have acquired devalued meanings in societal perceptions about persons with disabilities. They contribute to the negative self-image and perpetuate discriminatory attitudes and practices in society.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Persons with disabilities","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/Persons-with-disabilities.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/Persons-with-disabilities.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/Persons-with-disabilities.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/Persons-with-disabilities.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":330331,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/09\/delhi-hc-sets-aside-stay-on-employees-transfer-imposed-court-of-chief-commissioner-pwd-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":340598,"position":5},"title":"Court of Chief Commissioner for PwD cannot pass binding\/adjudicatory orders akin to those issued by court of law; Delhi HC sets aside stay on Employee\u2019s transfer","author":"Editor","date":"September 9, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u2018The Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 does not envisage the CCPD as an adjudicatory body capable of deciding service-related disputes or issuing enforceable orders.\u2019","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/340598","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=340598"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/340598\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/340603"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=340598"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=340598"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=340598"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}