{"id":340565,"date":"2025-02-06T10:00:53","date_gmt":"2025-02-06T04:30:53","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=340565"},"modified":"2025-02-13T09:44:12","modified_gmt":"2025-02-13T04:14:12","slug":"yoga-certificate-not-valid-sports-certificate-for-purpose-of-awarding-bonus-marks-for-pt-instructor-recruitment-raj-hc-scc-times","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/06\/yoga-certificate-not-valid-sports-certificate-for-purpose-of-awarding-bonus-marks-for-pt-instructor-recruitment-raj-hc-scc-times\/","title":{"rendered":"Yoga certificate not valid sports certificate for purpose of awarding bonus marks for PT Instructor recruitment: Rajasthan High Court"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Rajasthan High Court:<\/span> While deciding whether the Yoga certificate held by petitioner should be considered a valid sports certificate for the purpose of awarding bonus marks in the recruitment for the post of Physical Training Instructor, a single-judge bench of Arun Monga, J., upheld the respondent&#8217;s stand based on the Ministry&#8217;s communication dated 21-12-2016, which states that Yoga is not recognized as a sport due to its non-competitive nature.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In the instant matter, an advertisement (No. 09\/2018) dated 04-05-2018 invited applications for the post of Physical Training Instructor (PTI) Grade III. The petitioner participated in the All-India Inter-University Tournament (AIIUT) for Yoga during his degree course and was awarded a proficiency certificate. Bonus marks were granted based on participation in recognized sports events. Initially, the petitioner received 28 marks for his Yoga participation but later had his marks revised to zero. However, during the document verification process, it was found that Yoga is not a recognized sport by the Ministry of Youth Affairs and Sports (Government of India), as per a communication dated 21-12-2016. Consequently, the marks for Yoga were revised to zero.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The petitioner contended that the communication from the Ministry of Youth Affairs and Sports, which declared that Yoga is not a sport, should not affect the recognition of his certificate. It was argued that candidates in similar situations had been granted marks by the Rajasthan Public Service Commission (RPSC) in previous recruitments. It was stated that despite submitting a representation requesting the reconsideration of his marks, no action was taken by the respondents. However, the respondents contended that Yoga is not a recognized sport as per the communication dated 21-12-2016 from the Ministry of Youth Affairs and Sports, and therefore, the petitioner&#8217;s certificate was not valid for awarding bonus marks.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court noted that the Ministry&#8217;s communication dated 21-12-2016 clearly indicated that Yoga, despite being categorized as a discipline, was not feasible for competitive events and thus could not qualify as a sport for bonus marks. The Court stated that the subsequent communication dated 27-11-2020, cited by the petitioner, was irrelevant, as it applied to a later date and did not have retrospective effect.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 1%;\">The Court upheld the respondents&#8217; stance that Yoga certificates should not be considered for awarding bonus marks, as it does not meet the criteria of a recognized sport as outlined by the Ministry.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%; margin-left: 36pt; font-weight: bold;\">&#8220;Even if the Yoga is categorized as Sports as is the assertion of the petitioners, even then no benefit of the same can be given to the petitioners since it is not feasible to hold any competitive sports tournaments of Yoga and thus in strict sense it cannot be termed as sports for the purpose of according benefit of bonus marks.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court dismissed the petition on not finding any grounds to interfere with the decision of the respondents.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Sita Ram<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">State of Rajasthan<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/6zig7vP2\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2024 SCC OnLine Raj 3554<\/a>, Decided on 12-11-2024<\/span>]<\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">Mr. V.D. Vaishnav, Counsel for the Petitioners<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">Mr. Priyanshu Gopa for Mr. Vinit Sanadhya, Counsel for the Respondents<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">As per Ministry of Youth Affairs and Sports notification dated 21.12.2016, Yoga is not recognized as a sport.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67514,"featured_media":314824,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[78318,78317,55540,67205,78319,78322,78316,78320,2575,78321,78315],"class_list":["post-340565","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-all-india-inter-university-tournament","tag-bonus-marks-eligibility","tag-document-verification","tag-justice-arun-monga","tag-ministry-of-youth-affairs-and-sports-notification","tag-physical-training-instructor","tag-pti-recruitment","tag-rajasthan-education-department","tag-Rajasthan_High_Court","tag-recruitment-advertisement","tag-yoga-as-sport"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Yoga certificate not valid sports certificate for purpose of awarding bonus marks for PT Instructor recruitment: Rajasthan High Court | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Rajasthan High Court held that yoga certificate not valid sports certificate for purpose of awarding bonus marks for PT Instructor recruitment.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/06\/yoga-certificate-not-valid-sports-certificate-for-purpose-of-awarding-bonus-marks-for-pt-instructor-recruitment-raj-hc-scc-times\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Yoga certificate not valid sports certificate for purpose of awarding bonus marks for PT Instructor recruitment: Rajasthan High Court\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Rajasthan High Court held that yoga certificate not valid sports certificate for purpose of awarding bonus marks for PT Instructor recruitment.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/06\/yoga-certificate-not-valid-sports-certificate-for-purpose-of-awarding-bonus-marks-for-pt-instructor-recruitment-raj-hc-scc-times\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-02-06T04:30:53+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-02-13T04:14:12+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"591\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Yoga certificate not valid sports certificate for purpose of awarding bonus marks for PT Instructor recruitment: Rajasthan High Court\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/06\/yoga-certificate-not-valid-sports-certificate-for-purpose-of-awarding-bonus-marks-for-pt-instructor-recruitment-raj-hc-scc-times\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/06\/yoga-certificate-not-valid-sports-certificate-for-purpose-of-awarding-bonus-marks-for-pt-instructor-recruitment-raj-hc-scc-times\/\",\"name\":\"Yoga certificate not valid sports certificate for purpose of awarding bonus marks for PT Instructor recruitment: Rajasthan High Court | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/06\/yoga-certificate-not-valid-sports-certificate-for-purpose-of-awarding-bonus-marks-for-pt-instructor-recruitment-raj-hc-scc-times\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/06\/yoga-certificate-not-valid-sports-certificate-for-purpose-of-awarding-bonus-marks-for-pt-instructor-recruitment-raj-hc-scc-times\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-02-06T04:30:53+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-02-13T04:14:12+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\"},\"description\":\"Rajasthan High Court held that yoga certificate not valid sports certificate for purpose of awarding bonus marks for PT Instructor recruitment.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/06\/yoga-certificate-not-valid-sports-certificate-for-purpose-of-awarding-bonus-marks-for-pt-instructor-recruitment-raj-hc-scc-times\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/06\/yoga-certificate-not-valid-sports-certificate-for-purpose-of-awarding-bonus-marks-for-pt-instructor-recruitment-raj-hc-scc-times\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/06\/yoga-certificate-not-valid-sports-certificate-for-purpose-of-awarding-bonus-marks-for-pt-instructor-recruitment-raj-hc-scc-times\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp\",\"width\":887,\"height\":591,\"caption\":\"Rajasthan High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/06\/yoga-certificate-not-valid-sports-certificate-for-purpose-of-awarding-bonus-marks-for-pt-instructor-recruitment-raj-hc-scc-times\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Yoga certificate not valid sports certificate for purpose of awarding bonus marks for PT Instructor recruitment: Rajasthan High Court\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\",\"name\":\"Ritu\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Ritu\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_7\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Yoga certificate not valid sports certificate for purpose of awarding bonus marks for PT Instructor recruitment: Rajasthan High Court | SCC Times","description":"Rajasthan High Court held that yoga certificate not valid sports certificate for purpose of awarding bonus marks for PT Instructor recruitment.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/06\/yoga-certificate-not-valid-sports-certificate-for-purpose-of-awarding-bonus-marks-for-pt-instructor-recruitment-raj-hc-scc-times\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Yoga certificate not valid sports certificate for purpose of awarding bonus marks for PT Instructor recruitment: Rajasthan High Court","og_description":"Rajasthan High Court held that yoga certificate not valid sports certificate for purpose of awarding bonus marks for PT Instructor recruitment.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/06\/yoga-certificate-not-valid-sports-certificate-for-purpose-of-awarding-bonus-marks-for-pt-instructor-recruitment-raj-hc-scc-times\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2025-02-06T04:30:53+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-02-13T04:14:12+00:00","og_image":[{"width":887,"height":591,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Ritu","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Yoga certificate not valid sports certificate for purpose of awarding bonus marks for PT Instructor recruitment: Rajasthan High Court","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Ritu","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/06\/yoga-certificate-not-valid-sports-certificate-for-purpose-of-awarding-bonus-marks-for-pt-instructor-recruitment-raj-hc-scc-times\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/06\/yoga-certificate-not-valid-sports-certificate-for-purpose-of-awarding-bonus-marks-for-pt-instructor-recruitment-raj-hc-scc-times\/","name":"Yoga certificate not valid sports certificate for purpose of awarding bonus marks for PT Instructor recruitment: Rajasthan High Court | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/06\/yoga-certificate-not-valid-sports-certificate-for-purpose-of-awarding-bonus-marks-for-pt-instructor-recruitment-raj-hc-scc-times\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/06\/yoga-certificate-not-valid-sports-certificate-for-purpose-of-awarding-bonus-marks-for-pt-instructor-recruitment-raj-hc-scc-times\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp","datePublished":"2025-02-06T04:30:53+00:00","dateModified":"2025-02-13T04:14:12+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9"},"description":"Rajasthan High Court held that yoga certificate not valid sports certificate for purpose of awarding bonus marks for PT Instructor recruitment.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/06\/yoga-certificate-not-valid-sports-certificate-for-purpose-of-awarding-bonus-marks-for-pt-instructor-recruitment-raj-hc-scc-times\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/06\/yoga-certificate-not-valid-sports-certificate-for-purpose-of-awarding-bonus-marks-for-pt-instructor-recruitment-raj-hc-scc-times\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/06\/yoga-certificate-not-valid-sports-certificate-for-purpose-of-awarding-bonus-marks-for-pt-instructor-recruitment-raj-hc-scc-times\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp","width":887,"height":591,"caption":"Rajasthan High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/06\/yoga-certificate-not-valid-sports-certificate-for-purpose-of-awarding-bonus-marks-for-pt-instructor-recruitment-raj-hc-scc-times\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Yoga certificate not valid sports certificate for purpose of awarding bonus marks for PT Instructor recruitment: Rajasthan High Court"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9","name":"Ritu","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Ritu"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_7\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":341623,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/17\/migration-from-haryana-to-rajasthan-after-marriage-does-not-affect-migrant-womans-ews-eligibility-rajasthan-high-court-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":340565,"position":0},"title":"Migration \u2018from Haryana to Rajasthan\u2019 after Marriage does not affect migrant woman\u2019s EWS eligibility: Rajasthan High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"February 17, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe status of the petitioner of belonging to Economically Weaker Section (\u2018EWS\u2019) category is not in dispute herein.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Rajasthan High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":292900,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/23\/supreme-court-delivers-split-verdict-on-obc-and-ews-candidates-for-recruitment-of-civil-judge-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":340565,"position":1},"title":"Rajasthan Civil Judge Recruitment| SC delivers Split verdict on considering candidature of OBC-EWS candidates despite belated submission of category certificates","author":"Editor","date":"May 23, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Justice Ajay Rastogi and Bela M. Trivedi delivered their split verdicts while examining the challenge raised against the Judgment of Rajasthan High Court, dismissing the appeals of the qualified candidates of OBC, EWS category.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"rajasthan civil judge recruitment","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/rajasthan-civil-judge-recruitment.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/rajasthan-civil-judge-recruitment.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/rajasthan-civil-judge-recruitment.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/rajasthan-civil-judge-recruitment.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":247442,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/04\/21\/red-tapism\/","url_meta":{"origin":340565,"position":2},"title":"Raj HC | Red-Tapism prevalent\u00a0in\u00a0Rajasthan Nursing Council has resulted in\u00a0rejection\u00a0of candidature; Court found fundamental rights guaranteed by Arts. 14, 16 and 19(1)(g) of the Constitution of India violated","author":"Editor","date":"April 21, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Rajasthan High Court: Dinesh Mehta, J., allowed and disposed off a writ petition which was filed aggrieved of the respondent\u2019s action of reflecting petitioner\u2019s name in the list of ineligible\/rejected candidates. Petitioner had acquired GNM Diploma Course and was professionally qualified for the post of Nurse Grade-II\/GNM, vied pursuant to\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":365184,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/29\/justice-arun-monga-and-justice-tara-vitasta-ganju-were-sworn-in-as-judges-of-rajasthan-and-karnataka-high-court-respectively\/","url_meta":{"origin":340565,"position":3},"title":"Justice Arun Monga and Justice Tara Vitasta Ganju were sworn in as Judges of Rajasthan and Karnataka High Court respectively","author":"Editor","date":"October 29, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"https:\/\/youtube.com\/shorts\/lhe0eYLgkZI?feature=share","rel":"","context":"In &quot;WATCH NOW&quot;","block_context":{"text":"WATCH NOW","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/watch-now-2\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/reel-77-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/reel-77-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/reel-77-1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/reel-77-1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/reel-77-1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":282227,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/23\/quashed-determination-made-by-respondents-and-held-that-since-association-of-indian-universities-had-issued-equivalence-same-made-her-eligible-for-post-legal-news-legal-research-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":340565,"position":4},"title":"Rajasthan High Court upholds the validity of equivalence certificate issued by Association of Indian Universities","author":"Editor","date":"January 23, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Rajasthan High Court, after perusing the certificate issued by Association of Indian Universities and the notification issued by Ministry of Education, stated that AIU had issued equivalence certificate with regard to the qualification of the petitioner making the petitioner eligible for the post.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Rajasthan High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image40.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":254623,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/09\/23\/no-reason-to-cancel-pet-on-the-basis-of-a-better-technique-to-ensure-accuracy-in-pet\/","url_meta":{"origin":340565,"position":5},"title":"Raj HC | No reason to cancel PET on the basis of a better technique to ensure accuracy in PET; Court dismisses series of petitions","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"September 23, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Rajasthan High Court: The Division Bench of Indrajit Mahanty, CJ. and Satish Kumar Sharma, J., dismissed a series of Special appeals (writ) which were filed against order dated 3-9-2020, whereby writ petitions filed by the present appellants and others challenging the result of Physical Efficiency Test (PET) conducted in the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/340565","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67514"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=340565"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/340565\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/314824"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=340565"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=340565"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=340565"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}