{"id":340193,"date":"2025-01-31T18:00:03","date_gmt":"2025-01-31T12:30:03","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=340193"},"modified":"2025-02-05T09:29:20","modified_gmt":"2025-02-05T03:59:20","slug":"rohini-court-injuncts-counterfeiter-from-infringing-ghadi-trade-mark-packaging-and-tagline","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/31\/rohini-court-injuncts-counterfeiter-from-infringing-ghadi-trade-mark-packaging-and-tagline\/","title":{"rendered":"Rohini Court injuncts counterfeiter from infringing Ghadi\u2019s packaging and tagline \u2018Pahle Istemal Karen Fir Viswash Karen\u2019"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Rohini Court, Delhi:<\/span> In a suit filed by the detergent company Ghadi\/Ghari (&#8216;Ghadi&#8217;) under Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001563629\" target=\"_blank\">134<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001563630\" target=\"_blank\">135<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002776236\" target=\"_blank\">Trade Marks Act, 1999<\/a> and Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001532768\" target=\"_blank\">55<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002747171\" target=\"_blank\">Copyright Act, 1957<\/a> (&#8216;the Copyright Act&#8217;) seeking a permanent injunction, restraining infringement of trademark(s), copyright, and passing off their products as that of Ghadi, a Single Judge Bench of Vinod Yadav, J., ruled in favour of Ghadi thereby permanently injuncting the defendant from infringing upon Ghadi&#8217;s trade mark\/copyright. The Court held that it was evident that the defendant adopted the impugned trade mark\/label\/trade dress identical with, or deceptively similar to Ghadi&#8217;s registered trade mark, which created the same commercial impression, and an unwary customer could be easily misled and deceived.<\/p>\n<h3>Background<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Ghadi, a company engaged in the business of manufacturing and selling washing soap, detergent, cleaning supplies, etc., was the proprietor of the registered trade mark device of ghari\/watch\/clock <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/18_RSPL-Limited-v.-Arjun-Kumar-1.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/18_RSPL-Limited-v.-Arjun-Kumar-1.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"100\" height=\"100\"\/><\/a> \/ <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/18_RSPL-Limited-v.-Arjun-Kumar-2.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/18_RSPL-Limited-v.-Arjun-Kumar-2.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"90\" height=\"100\"\/><\/a> in their packaging\/labels. The artistic work involved in the Ghadi&#8217;s packaging\/label under the said trade mark was also registered under the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002747171\" target=\"_blank\">Copyright Act<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The defendant company was also engaged in the business of manufacturing, trading, and soliciting detergent powder, detergent cake, soap, etc.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Allegedly, in 2022, Ghadi came across the defendant&#8217;s goods under the impugned trade mark\/label &#8220;26 White&#8221; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/18_RSPL-Limited-v.-Arjun-Kumar-3.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/18_RSPL-Limited-v.-Arjun-Kumar-3.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"90\" height=\"90\"\/><\/a> \/ <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/18_RSPL-Limited-v.-Arjun-Kumar-4.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/18_RSPL-Limited-v.-Arjun-Kumar-4.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"90\" height=\"100\"\/><\/a> which was deceptively similar and identical to the well-known trade mark of Ghadi. The defendant was also using the impugned tagline &#8220;<span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Hamesha Istemaal Kare Or Kapde Me Chamak Paaye<\/span>&#8221; which was similar to Ghadi&#8217;s distinctive tagline &#8220;<span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Pahle Istemal Karen Fir Viswash Karen<\/span>&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Aggrieved, Ghadi filed a suit for permanent injunction against the defendant before the District Judge (Commercial), Karkardooma Court, Delhi. The District Judge passed an ex-parte ad-interim injunction against the defendant and appointed a Local Commissioner(&#8216;LC&#8217;) to search and seize the impugned goods from the defendant&#8217;s premises. Accordingly, search and seizure were conducted whereby huge quantities of impugned products bearing the impugned trade mark of the defendant were seized.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Subsequently, the parties settled the dispute after the defendant admitted the proprietary rights of Ghadi&#8217;s trade mark packaging and punch line as well as undertook not to use them. The defendant also undertook to withdraw his trade mark application. In view of the joint compromise application filed under Order <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001523254\" target=\"_blank\">23 Rule 3<\/a> read with Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001523743\" target=\"_blank\">151<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726944\" target=\"_blank\">Code of Civil Procedure, 1908<\/a> (&#8216;CPC&#8217;), the suit was decreed in favour of Ghadi.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Despite such compromise, the defendant continued to use the impugned trade mark. Aggrieved, Ghadi filed the present suit.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court allowed the application filed by Ghadi under Order <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001523435\" target=\"_blank\">39 Rule 1<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001523437\" target=\"_blank\">2<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726944\" target=\"_blank\">CPC<\/a> seeking an ex-parte ad-interim injunction against the defendant as well as the application filed under Order <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001523293\" target=\"_blank\">26 Rule 9<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726944\" target=\"_blank\">CPC<\/a> seeking appointment of LC for the seizure of impugned goods from the premises of the defendant. Accordingly, another seizure was conducted by the Local Commissioner wherein 207 bags and 839 pieces of infringed goods were seized, amounting to around Rs. 10,00,000.<\/p>\n<h3>Analysis<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court stated that evidently, the defendant adopted the impugned trade mark\/label\/trade dress identical with or deceptively similar to Ghadi&#8217;s registered trade mark, which created the same commercial impression, and an unwary customer could be easily misled into buying the infringed goods as that of Ghadi. The Court stated that the defendant could not be allowed to piggyback upon Ghadi&#8217;s reputation.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Regarding the infringement of Ghadi&#8217;s tagline, the Court relied on <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Procter &amp; Gamble Manufacturing (Tianjin) Co. Ltd.<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Anchor Health &amp; Beauty Care Pvt. Ltd.<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/7k398e8q\" target=\"_blank\">2014 SCC OnLine Del 3374<\/a> wherein it was held that slogans\/taglines\/expressions used repeatedly eventually came to identify the brand and contributed to the overall brand quality.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court also noted that the defendant did not oppose the LC&#8217;s report.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Considering the facts and circumstances, the Court held that there was no real prospect of the defendant succeeding, especially since the written statement was not taken on record due to procedural issues. Thus, no useful purpose would be served by allowing the proceedings to meander mindlessly in Court and to clog the justice delivery system. Therefore, the Court held that the present case was fit for summary judgment under Order 13-A of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726944\" target=\"_blank\">CPC<\/a>, as applicable to commercial disputes, to be passed in favour of the plaintiff and against the defendant. The Court stated that no useful purpose would be served, firstly by framing the issue for the grant of damages and costs, and secondly by asking Ghadi to lead evidence in the matter. In this regard, the Court referred to <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Su-Kam Power Systems Ltd.<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Kunwer Sachdev<\/span> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/bKxi61qf\" target=\"_blank\">2019 SCC OnLine Del 10764<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Holding the aforesaid, the Court granted a permanent injunction in favour of Ghadi thereby restraining from infringing Ghadi&#8217;s registered trademark(s), and copyright and passing off their products as that of Ghadi.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court granted also damages worth Rs. 5,00,000 and a cost of Rs. 1,50,000 to Ghadi. In this regard, the Court relied upon the recovery made by the LC, Rule 20 of the Delhi High Court Intellectual Property Rights Division Rules, 2022, and <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Koninlijke Philips N.V.<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Amazestore<\/span> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/UL30vnOO\" target=\"_blank\">2019 SCC OnLine Del 8198<\/a>, wherein the Court laid down certain standards for grant of damages.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">RSPL Limited v. SKS Chemical Industries, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/h7bhILWA\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2025 SCC OnLine Dis Crt (Del) 2<\/a>, decided on 27-01-2025<\/span>]<\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the plaintiff:<\/span> Anil Kumar Sahu<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the respondent:<\/span> Namit Saxena and Isha Nagpal<\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Trade Marks Act, 1999 &nbsp; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1218\" target=\"_blank\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1218\" target=\"_blank\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/trade-marks-act-1999-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"trade marks act, 1999\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-296380\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/trade-marks-act-1999-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/trade-marks-act-1999-768x512.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/trade-marks-act-1999-1536x1024.jpg 1536w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/trade-marks-act-1999-2048x1365.jpg 2048w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/trade-marks-act-1999-440x293.jpg 440w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/trade-marks-act-1999-650x433.jpg 650w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/trade-marks-act-1999-886x590.jpg 886w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/trade-marks-act-1999-60x40.jpg 60w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">The Court held that the defendant had no real prospect of successfully defending their claim for tagline &#8220;Hamesha Istemaal Kare or Kapde Me Chamak Paaye&#8221;; and there was no other compelling reason as to why the Ghadi&#8217;s claim should not be disposed of before recording of oral evidence vide a summary judgment.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":340204,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,4721],"tags":[9461,11391,27414,2543,63520,2943,78115,78114,14722,52232,52234,18071,46799,50194],"class_list":["post-340193","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-district-court","tag-copyright-act","tag-copyright-infringement","tag-cpc","tag-Delhi_High_Court","tag-ghadi","tag-injunction","tag-intellectual-property-rights-division-rules","tag-justice-vinod-yadav","tag-passing-off","tag-rohini-court","tag-tagline","tag-trademark-infringement","tag-trademarks-act","tag-well-known-trademark"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Rohini Court injuncts counterfeiter from infringing Ghadi\u2019s trade mark packaging and tagline | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Rohini Court injuncted a counterfeiter from infringing Ghadi\u2019s trade mark packaging and tagline\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/31\/rohini-court-injuncts-counterfeiter-from-infringing-ghadi-trade-mark-packaging-and-tagline\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Rohini Court injuncts counterfeiter from infringing Ghadi\u2019s packaging and tagline \u2018Pahle Istemal Karen Fir Viswash Karen\u2019\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Rohini Court injuncted a counterfeiter from infringing Ghadi\u2019s trade mark packaging and tagline\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/31\/rohini-court-injuncts-counterfeiter-from-infringing-ghadi-trade-mark-packaging-and-tagline\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-01-31T12:30:03+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-02-05T03:59:20+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/Ghadi-trade-mark-infringement.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Rohini Court injuncts counterfeiter from infringing Ghadi\u2019s packaging and tagline \u2018Pahle Istemal Karen Fir Viswash Karen\u2019\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/31\/rohini-court-injuncts-counterfeiter-from-infringing-ghadi-trade-mark-packaging-and-tagline\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/31\/rohini-court-injuncts-counterfeiter-from-infringing-ghadi-trade-mark-packaging-and-tagline\/\",\"name\":\"Rohini Court injuncts counterfeiter from infringing Ghadi\u2019s trade mark packaging and tagline | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/31\/rohini-court-injuncts-counterfeiter-from-infringing-ghadi-trade-mark-packaging-and-tagline\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/31\/rohini-court-injuncts-counterfeiter-from-infringing-ghadi-trade-mark-packaging-and-tagline\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/Ghadi-trade-mark-infringement.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-01-31T12:30:03+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-02-05T03:59:20+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"Rohini Court injuncted a counterfeiter from infringing Ghadi\u2019s trade mark packaging and tagline\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/31\/rohini-court-injuncts-counterfeiter-from-infringing-ghadi-trade-mark-packaging-and-tagline\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/31\/rohini-court-injuncts-counterfeiter-from-infringing-ghadi-trade-mark-packaging-and-tagline\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/31\/rohini-court-injuncts-counterfeiter-from-infringing-ghadi-trade-mark-packaging-and-tagline\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/Ghadi-trade-mark-infringement.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/Ghadi-trade-mark-infringement.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"Ghadi trade mark infringement\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/31\/rohini-court-injuncts-counterfeiter-from-infringing-ghadi-trade-mark-packaging-and-tagline\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Rohini Court injuncts counterfeiter from infringing Ghadi\u2019s packaging and tagline \u2018Pahle Istemal Karen Fir Viswash Karen\u2019\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Rohini Court injuncts counterfeiter from infringing Ghadi\u2019s trade mark packaging and tagline | SCC Times","description":"Rohini Court injuncted a counterfeiter from infringing Ghadi\u2019s trade mark packaging and tagline","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/31\/rohini-court-injuncts-counterfeiter-from-infringing-ghadi-trade-mark-packaging-and-tagline\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Rohini Court injuncts counterfeiter from infringing Ghadi\u2019s packaging and tagline \u2018Pahle Istemal Karen Fir Viswash Karen\u2019","og_description":"Rohini Court injuncted a counterfeiter from infringing Ghadi\u2019s trade mark packaging and tagline","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/31\/rohini-court-injuncts-counterfeiter-from-infringing-ghadi-trade-mark-packaging-and-tagline\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2025-01-31T12:30:03+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-02-05T03:59:20+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/Ghadi-trade-mark-infringement.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Rohini Court injuncts counterfeiter from infringing Ghadi\u2019s packaging and tagline \u2018Pahle Istemal Karen Fir Viswash Karen\u2019","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/31\/rohini-court-injuncts-counterfeiter-from-infringing-ghadi-trade-mark-packaging-and-tagline\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/31\/rohini-court-injuncts-counterfeiter-from-infringing-ghadi-trade-mark-packaging-and-tagline\/","name":"Rohini Court injuncts counterfeiter from infringing Ghadi\u2019s trade mark packaging and tagline | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/31\/rohini-court-injuncts-counterfeiter-from-infringing-ghadi-trade-mark-packaging-and-tagline\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/31\/rohini-court-injuncts-counterfeiter-from-infringing-ghadi-trade-mark-packaging-and-tagline\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/Ghadi-trade-mark-infringement.webp","datePublished":"2025-01-31T12:30:03+00:00","dateModified":"2025-02-05T03:59:20+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"Rohini Court injuncted a counterfeiter from infringing Ghadi\u2019s trade mark packaging and tagline","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/31\/rohini-court-injuncts-counterfeiter-from-infringing-ghadi-trade-mark-packaging-and-tagline\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/31\/rohini-court-injuncts-counterfeiter-from-infringing-ghadi-trade-mark-packaging-and-tagline\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/31\/rohini-court-injuncts-counterfeiter-from-infringing-ghadi-trade-mark-packaging-and-tagline\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/Ghadi-trade-mark-infringement.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/Ghadi-trade-mark-infringement.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"Ghadi trade mark infringement"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/31\/rohini-court-injuncts-counterfeiter-from-infringing-ghadi-trade-mark-packaging-and-tagline\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Rohini Court injuncts counterfeiter from infringing Ghadi\u2019s packaging and tagline \u2018Pahle Istemal Karen Fir Viswash Karen\u2019"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/Ghadi-trade-mark-infringement.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":275184,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/07\/tag-line-pehle-check-karen-phir-vishwas-karen-is-identical-and-deceptively-similar-to-tag-line-pehle-istemal-karen-phir-vishwas-karen-delhi-court-restrains-gtm-jewelry-mar\/","url_meta":{"origin":340193,"position":0},"title":"Tag line \u2018PEHLE CHECK KAREN PHIR VISHWAS KAREN\u2019 is identical and deceptively similar to tag line \u2018PEHLE ISTEMAL KAREN PHIR VISHWAS KAREN\u2019; Delhi Court restrains GTM Jewelry Mart","author":"Editor","date":"October 7, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"While determining whether there is infringement of trademark, one is not required to see dissimilarity, but one is required to see similarity and there is similarity of all words except one word, in the present case.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/MicrosoftTeams-image-113-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/MicrosoftTeams-image-113-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/MicrosoftTeams-image-113-1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/MicrosoftTeams-image-113-1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/MicrosoftTeams-image-113-1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/MicrosoftTeams-image-113-1.jpg?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":309309,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/14\/delhi-high-court-tata-sons-cease-using-xpert-as-trademark-but-use-expert-in-descriptive-manner-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":340193,"position":1},"title":"Delhi High Court| Tata Sons shall cease to use \u2018XPERT\u2019 as trademark but use EXPERT in a non-trademark sense in a descriptive manner for its detergent product","author":"Arunima","date":"December 14, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The grievance of RSPL Limited is the use of the mark EXPERT and depiction of the partial clock on the detergent packaging of the defendants as also the use of the word expert and use of the elongated X and DX.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":351458,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/25\/dhc-ghadi-detergent-to-remove-ads-derogatory-surf-excel\/","url_meta":{"origin":340193,"position":2},"title":"Delhi High Court directs Ghadi detergent to remove derogatory phrases targeting Surf Excel from its advertisements","author":"Editor","date":"June 25, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"It is permissible for an advertiser to undertake an advertising campaign to promote its own product so long as the same is not deliberately tarnishing or defaming the competitor's product.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Ghadi Surf excel","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/Ghadi-Surf-excel.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/Ghadi-Surf-excel.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/Ghadi-Surf-excel.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/Ghadi-Surf-excel.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":272153,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/24\/delhi-high-court-grants-permanent-injunction-royal-champ-compensates-damages-royal-stag-copyright-trademark-infrigement\/","url_meta":{"origin":340193,"position":3},"title":"Delhi High Court injuncts Royal Champ from using Royal Stag\/ Seagram marks; Similar label also amounts to copyright infringement; Directs Rs 20 lakh as damages","author":"Editor","date":"August 24, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: In a case where permanent injunction was sought against use of Royal Champs, a Gwalior Distilleries Private Limited product (\u2018defendants'), selling whiskeys under a deceptively similar name and label design and using the goodwill of Royal Stag, a Seagram India Private Limited product (plaintiffs), Navin Chawla, J.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":274911,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/03\/delhi-high-court-no-need-for-injunction-in-favour-of-colgate-as-custom-authorities-denied-import-of-infringing-goods-in-india\/","url_meta":{"origin":340193,"position":4},"title":"Delhi High Court | No need for injunction in favour of Colgate as Custom authorities denied import of infringing goods in India","author":"Editor","date":"October 3, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Delhi High Court: In a suit filed by Colgate Palmolive Company (\u2018plaintiff\u2019) seeking permanent injunction, restraining infringement of trademark COLGATE, copyright, trade dress etc. against unknown Defendants who are responsible for importing a container in India having products bearing marks which are deceptively\/ confusingly similar to the Plaintiffs\u2019\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Colgate","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/Delhi-High-Court-No-need-for-injunction-in-favour-of-Colgate-as-Custom-authorities-denied-import-of-infringing-goods-in-India-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/Delhi-High-Court-No-need-for-injunction-in-favour-of-Colgate-as-Custom-authorities-denied-import-of-infringing-goods-in-India-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/Delhi-High-Court-No-need-for-injunction-in-favour-of-Colgate-as-Custom-authorities-denied-import-of-infringing-goods-in-India-1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/Delhi-High-Court-No-need-for-injunction-in-favour-of-Colgate-as-Custom-authorities-denied-import-of-infringing-goods-in-India-1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/Delhi-High-Court-No-need-for-injunction-in-favour-of-Colgate-as-Custom-authorities-denied-import-of-infringing-goods-in-India-1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":60301,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/06\/single-judge-bound-by-judicial-discipline-and-propriety-to-follow-division-benchs-decision\/","url_meta":{"origin":340193,"position":5},"title":"Single Judge bound by judicial discipline and propriety to follow Division Bench&#8217;s decision","author":"Sucheta","date":"August 6, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: Deciding an appeal wherein the Single Judge of this Court had ruled that the plaint filed by the appellant-plaintiff was liable to be returned under Order 7 Rule 10 CPC as the Court lacked the territorial jurisdiction to entertain the suit and that no part of the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/340193","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=340193"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/340193\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/340204"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=340193"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=340193"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=340193"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}