{"id":340164,"date":"2025-01-31T13:00:11","date_gmt":"2025-01-31T07:30:11","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=340164"},"modified":"2025-02-04T10:23:11","modified_gmt":"2025-02-04T04:53:11","slug":"bombay-hc-injuncts-distributor-from-damaging-wonderchef-reputation","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/31\/bombay-hc-injuncts-distributor-from-damaging-wonderchef-reputation\/","title":{"rendered":"\u2018Distributor contractually obliged to maintain favourable reflection &amp; protect goodwill\u2019; Bombay HC injuncts distributor from damaging Wonderchef\u2019s reputation"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Bombay High Court:<\/span> In an application filed under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001544997\" target=\"_blank\">9<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726958\" target=\"_blank\">Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996<\/a> (&#8216;the Act&#8217;) filed by Wonderchef Home Appliances (&#8216;Wonderchef&#8217;) against the respondent, its distributor in Australia, seeking an injunction against the distributor from making any disparaging statements or taking any actions that may harm Wonderchef&#8217;s reputation and brand name, a Single Judge Bench of Somasekhar Sundaresan, J., allowed the petition and injuncted the distributor for 90 days from indulging in any action that would violate the agreement between the parties (&#8216;the Agreement&#8217;) which provided that the distributor shall conduct business in a manner that would always reflect favourably on Wonderchef&#8217;s reputation and products.<\/p>\n<h3>Background<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The distributor was allegedly sending e-mails complaining about defects in Wonderchef&#8217;s products, the poor treatment of the distributor, and how their relationship was being handled. Aggrieved by this, Wonderchef filed the present petition seeking an injunction against the distributor from making any disparaging statements or taking any actions that may harm or damage, malign, or disparage their reputation and brand name under Section 9 of the Act, before the invocation of arbitration as per the Agreement.<\/p>\n<h3>Analysis<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Regarding the scope of consideration under Section 9 of the Act, the Court stated that the powers were essentially to make interim measures of protection with respect to the preservation or inspection of the subject matter of the agreement between the parties, which was subject to resolution by arbitration. &nbsp;The Court stated that to be able to seek a gag order, Wonderchef would need to show that the remarks of the distributor were prohibited by the Agreement.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">At the outset, Court pointed out that commercial speech was imminently part of free speech, and it was difficult for a Court to prohibit a party from expressing its grievances about a product acquired in the course of commerce since it was supposed to be borne in mind whether such expression was truthful and warranted. <span style=\"font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;\">Merely because a speech was made in a commercial context, it would not cease to have the ingredients of free expression.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Regarding the contention that confidential information was shared by the distributor in violation of the Agreement, the Court stated that such an inference would be too sweeping. To consider any and every comment on Wonderchef&#8217;s products as being &#8216;confidential information&#8217; would also be counter-intuitive because a distributor who was expected to publicly praise the virtues of the products would, in terms of this interpretation, violate confidential information since he would be sharing information about the products.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">However, the Court noted that Clause 12.2(c) of the Agreement provided that the distributor shall conduct business in a manner that &#8220;reflects favourably at all times&#8221; on Wonderchef&#8217;s products and reputation. The distributor was contractually obliged to conduct business in the aforesaid manner in order to develop, promote, and maintain such reputation and favourable reflection with customers, and to protect as well as preserve the goodwill and image of Wonderchef and its products. The Court stated that, thus, the reliefs prayed for in the present petition could be granted within the jurisdiction of Section 9 of the Act. The Court elaborated that since the subject matter of the dispute was the Agreement and Clause 12.2(c) formed an integral part of the Agreement, pending the resolution of disputes and differences between the parties, the Court had a ground for affording some protection under Section 9.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Thus, the Court held that there was an element of the distributor having consciously and autonomously bound himself not to harm Wonderchef&#8217;s reputation.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court noted that in 2023, the distributor sought arbitration proceedings to be initiated, but there was nothing on record to show that Wonderchef responded favourably to such an offer. Thereafter, the parties engaged in discussions, and Wonderchef sent a draft settlement agreement to the distributor, which dismissed the draft as being one-sided. The discussions between the parties took a shabby turn, after which the aforesaid e-mails were allegedly sent by the distributor to the various parties.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court remarked that Wonderchef, being promoted by a celebrity Indian chef, enjoyed a strong reputation. Even from what was brought on record, it was hard to conclude that the distributor&#8217;s e-mails were able to cause any perceptible dent to Wonderchef&#8217;s reputation. <span style=\"font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;\">Higher the stature of the celebrity, the thicker the skin, was a reasonable expectation<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court added that if the comments made during a commercial dispute would not dent the reputation and cause light harm, one had to be even more careful when considering whether and how to deal with a prayer for gagging free commercial speech. If the nature of the expression would lead a reasonable person of commerce to conclude that the publicly aired complaints were rants of a disgruntled commercial counterparty, the likelihood of damage would not be easy to infer. Stating this, the Court noted that in the present case, such a reaction was seen in the response from another distributor based in Fiji, who told the distributor that he was quite happy with Wonderchef&#8217;s products and advised it to resolve the dispute.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Considering the aforesaid, to balance equities and make an interim arrangement, the Court allowed the petition by granting an injunction against the distributor for 90 days. The Court further directed the distributor to ensure that he fully complied with Clause 12.2(c) of the Agreement and to refrain from indulging in any action that would violate it. The Court also stated that it expected that Wonderchef would invoke the arbitration within the aforesaid period of 90 days.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court highlighted that typically disparagement cases in a commercial context were set in the context of disputes between competitors, so this was a unique case in which the manufacturer accused the distributor of disparagement.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Lastly, the Court held that whether the e-mails sent by the distributor were accurate and their contents bore out the truth were matters of evidence that the arbitral tribunal would decide on merits.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Wonderchef Home Appliances Pvt. Ltd v. Shree Swaminarayanan Pty Ltd., <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/nsPO1l07\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2025 SCC OnLine Bom 178<\/a>, decided on 27-01-2025<\/span>]<\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the petitioner:<\/span> Malhar Zatakia and Kaushal Ameta<\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 &nbsp; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=382\" target=\"_blank\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=382\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/arbitration-and-conciliation-act-1996-191x300.png\" alt=\"arbitration and conciliation act, 1996\" width=\"191\" height=\"300\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294803\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/arbitration-and-conciliation-act-1996-191x300.png 191w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/arbitration-and-conciliation-act-1996-38x60.png 38w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/arbitration-and-conciliation-act-1996.png 620w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 191px) 100vw, 191px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">The Court granted injunction in favour of Wonderchef while bearing in mind that free speech cannot be lightly proscribed, and commercial speech formed a part of it.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":314919,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[2569,78076,42850,42901,25474,2943,72782,32879,41949,78075],"class_list":["post-340164","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-Bombay_High_Court","tag-celebrity-chef-sanjeev-kapoor","tag-commercial-speech","tag-free-speech","tag-gag-order","tag-injunction","tag-justice-somasekhar-sundaresan","tag-reputation","tag-section-9-of-arbitration-and-conciliation-act","tag-wonderchef"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Bombay HC injuncts distributor from damaging Wonderchef&#039;s reputation | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Bombay HC injuncted distributor from damaging Wonderchef&#039;s reputation as per contractual obligation to maintain favourable reflection &amp; protect goodwill\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/31\/bombay-hc-injuncts-distributor-from-damaging-wonderchef-reputation\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"\u2018Distributor contractually obliged to maintain favourable reflection &amp; protect goodwill\u2019; Bombay HC injuncts distributor from damaging Wonderchef\u2019s reputation\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Bombay HC injuncted distributor from damaging Wonderchef&#039;s reputation as per contractual obligation to maintain favourable reflection &amp; protect goodwill\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/31\/bombay-hc-injuncts-distributor-from-damaging-wonderchef-reputation\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-01-31T07:30:11+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-02-04T04:53:11+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"591\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"\u2018Distributor contractually obliged to maintain favourable reflection &amp; protect goodwill\u2019; Bombay HC injuncts distributor from damaging Wonderchef\u2019s reputation\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/31\/bombay-hc-injuncts-distributor-from-damaging-wonderchef-reputation\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/31\/bombay-hc-injuncts-distributor-from-damaging-wonderchef-reputation\/\",\"name\":\"Bombay HC injuncts distributor from damaging Wonderchef's reputation | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/31\/bombay-hc-injuncts-distributor-from-damaging-wonderchef-reputation\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/31\/bombay-hc-injuncts-distributor-from-damaging-wonderchef-reputation\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-01-31T07:30:11+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-02-04T04:53:11+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"Bombay HC injuncted distributor from damaging Wonderchef's reputation as per contractual obligation to maintain favourable reflection & protect goodwill\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/31\/bombay-hc-injuncts-distributor-from-damaging-wonderchef-reputation\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/31\/bombay-hc-injuncts-distributor-from-damaging-wonderchef-reputation\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/31\/bombay-hc-injuncts-distributor-from-damaging-wonderchef-reputation\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp\",\"width\":887,\"height\":591,\"caption\":\"Bombay High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/31\/bombay-hc-injuncts-distributor-from-damaging-wonderchef-reputation\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"\u2018Distributor contractually obliged to maintain favourable reflection &amp; protect goodwill\u2019; Bombay HC injuncts distributor from damaging Wonderchef\u2019s reputation\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Bombay HC injuncts distributor from damaging Wonderchef's reputation | SCC Times","description":"Bombay HC injuncted distributor from damaging Wonderchef's reputation as per contractual obligation to maintain favourable reflection & protect goodwill","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/31\/bombay-hc-injuncts-distributor-from-damaging-wonderchef-reputation\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"\u2018Distributor contractually obliged to maintain favourable reflection & protect goodwill\u2019; Bombay HC injuncts distributor from damaging Wonderchef\u2019s reputation","og_description":"Bombay HC injuncted distributor from damaging Wonderchef's reputation as per contractual obligation to maintain favourable reflection & protect goodwill","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/31\/bombay-hc-injuncts-distributor-from-damaging-wonderchef-reputation\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2025-01-31T07:30:11+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-02-04T04:53:11+00:00","og_image":[{"width":887,"height":591,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"\u2018Distributor contractually obliged to maintain favourable reflection &amp; protect goodwill\u2019; Bombay HC injuncts distributor from damaging Wonderchef\u2019s reputation","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/31\/bombay-hc-injuncts-distributor-from-damaging-wonderchef-reputation\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/31\/bombay-hc-injuncts-distributor-from-damaging-wonderchef-reputation\/","name":"Bombay HC injuncts distributor from damaging Wonderchef's reputation | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/31\/bombay-hc-injuncts-distributor-from-damaging-wonderchef-reputation\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/31\/bombay-hc-injuncts-distributor-from-damaging-wonderchef-reputation\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp","datePublished":"2025-01-31T07:30:11+00:00","dateModified":"2025-02-04T04:53:11+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"Bombay HC injuncted distributor from damaging Wonderchef's reputation as per contractual obligation to maintain favourable reflection & protect goodwill","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/31\/bombay-hc-injuncts-distributor-from-damaging-wonderchef-reputation\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/31\/bombay-hc-injuncts-distributor-from-damaging-wonderchef-reputation\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/31\/bombay-hc-injuncts-distributor-from-damaging-wonderchef-reputation\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp","width":887,"height":591,"caption":"Bombay High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/31\/bombay-hc-injuncts-distributor-from-damaging-wonderchef-reputation\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"\u2018Distributor contractually obliged to maintain favourable reflection &amp; protect goodwill\u2019; Bombay HC injuncts distributor from damaging Wonderchef\u2019s reputation"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":282060,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/20\/supreme-court-collegium-reiterated-earlier-proposal-to-elevate-advocate-somasekhar-sundaresan-as-judge-bombay-high-court-legal-news-legal-research-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":340164,"position":0},"title":"Supreme Court Collegium reiterates Advocate Somasekhar Sundaresan elevation as a Bombay High Court Judge; says he can&#39;t be denied judgeship for expressing his views","author":"Editor","date":"January 20, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Supreme Court Collegium added that there are no indications of Advocate Somasekhar Sundaresan's links with any political parties with strong ideological leanings and emphasised on the right to free speech and expression under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Hot Off The Press&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Hot Off The Press","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/hot_off_the_press\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/MicrosoftTeams-image-143.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":340308,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/02\/high-court-weekly-roundup-january-2025-on-khadis-device-mark-live-in-couples-wonderchef\/","url_meta":{"origin":340164,"position":1},"title":"HIGH COURT JANUARY 2025 WEEKLY ROUNDUP | Khadi\u2019s Device Mark; Police Protection for Live-In Couples; Wonderchef\u2019s Reputation; and more","author":"Editor","date":"February 2, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"A quick legal roundup to cover important stories from all High Courts this week.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;High Court Round Up&quot;","block_context":{"text":"High Court Round Up","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/columns-for-roundup\/high-court-round-up\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"High Court Weekly Roundup","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/shared-image-2025-02-02T150059.697.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/shared-image-2025-02-02T150059.697.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/shared-image-2025-02-02T150059.697.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/shared-image-2025-02-02T150059.697.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":341523,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/15\/bhc-dismisses-condonation-application-by-national-highway-division-arbitration-appeal\/","url_meta":{"origin":340164,"position":2},"title":"\u2018Entirely based on false foundation\u2019; Bombay HC dismisses condonation of delay application by National Highway Division in arbitration appeal","author":"Editor","date":"February 15, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cIt is now trite law that State agencies cannot hide behind the conventional excuse of bureaucratic delays and inefficiency in the State\u2019s capacity, to condone delays.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Bombay High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":307794,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/11\/24\/president-appoints-somasekhar-sundaresan-additional-judge-bombay-hc-scc-blog-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":340164,"position":3},"title":"President appoints Advocate Somasekhar Sundaresan as an Additional Judge of the Bombay High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"November 24, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"10 Months after Supreme Court Collegium re-recommendation, Advocate Somasekhar Sundaresan is appointed as Additional Judge of the High Court of Bombay","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Appointments &amp; Transfers&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Appointments &amp; Transfers","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/appointments\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Advocate Somasekhar Sundaresan","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/Advocate-Somasekhar-Sundaresan.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/Advocate-Somasekhar-Sundaresan.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/Advocate-Somasekhar-Sundaresan.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/Advocate-Somasekhar-Sundaresan.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":370626,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/23\/bom-hc-constructive-res-judicata-bars-re-litigation-of-interest-claims\/","url_meta":{"origin":340164,"position":4},"title":"Constructive res judicata bars re-litigation of interest claims; fresh arbitration impermissible after arbitral award: Bombay High Court","author":"Soumya Yadav","date":"December 23, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cSince disputes had already been subjected to arbitration and culminated in the Arbitral Award, the disputes and differences, including differences over interest payment prior to commencement of arbitration, are issues that are covered by constructive res judicata.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"res judicata bars re-litigation","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/res-judicata-bars-re-litigation.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/res-judicata-bars-re-litigation.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/res-judicata-bars-re-litigation.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/res-judicata-bars-re-litigation.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":353618,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/17\/bom-hc-directs-amazon-delist-victorinox-products-sold-by-gute-reise\/","url_meta":{"origin":340164,"position":5},"title":"Know why Bombay HC directed Amazon to delist Victorinox products sold by former dealer Gute Reise","author":"Editor","date":"July 17, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cShould Gute Reise be desirous of using its account with Amazon for selling any products other than Victorinox\u2019s branded products, it shall be free to do so, and Amazon shall not stand in the way of Gute Reise selling other products.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delisting Victorinox products on Amazon","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/delisting-Victorinox-products-on-Amazon.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/delisting-Victorinox-products-on-Amazon.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/delisting-Victorinox-products-on-Amazon.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/delisting-Victorinox-products-on-Amazon.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/340164","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=340164"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/340164\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/314919"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=340164"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=340164"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=340164"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}