{"id":340126,"date":"2025-01-31T09:00:53","date_gmt":"2025-01-31T03:30:53","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=340126"},"modified":"2025-01-30T20:29:32","modified_gmt":"2025-01-30T14:59:32","slug":"2025-scc-vol-1-part-4","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/31\/2025-scc-vol-1-part-4\/","title":{"rendered":"2025 SCC Vol. 1 Part 4"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n

Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996<\/a> — S. 11(6)<\/a> — Substantive claims of petitioner whether time-barred i.e. issue of limitation requiring intricate evidentiary enquiry:<\/span> While determining the issue of limitation in the exercise of powers under S. 11(6), the referral Court must only conduct a limited enquiry for the purpose of examining whether the S. 11(6) application has been filed within the limitation period of three years or not. Further, at this stage, it would not be proper for the referral Court to indulge in an intricate evidentiary enquiry into the question of whether the claims raised by the petitioner are time-barred and such a determination must be left to the decision of the arbitrator, [Aslam Ismail Khan Deshmukh<\/i> v. ASAP Fluids (P) Ltd.<\/i>, (2025) 1 SCC 502<\/a>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996<\/a> — Ss. 11(6)<\/a> and 16<\/a> — Applicability of Group of Companies Doctrine for binding non-signatory:<\/span> Determination of applicability of Group of Companies Doctrine for binding non-signatory, by Arbitral Tribunal, as opposed to by Court at referral stage, [Cox & Kings Ltd.<\/i> v. SAP (India) (P) Ltd.<\/i>, (2025) 1 SCC 611<\/a>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Consumer Protection — Consumer\/Consumer Dispute\/Locus Standi — “Commercial purpose”:<\/span> What is “commercial purpose”, explained. Residential flat booked for one of its Directors and his family by respondent real estate development company, with the appellant developer did not amount to purchase\/allotment for commercial purpose, [Omkar Realtors & Developers (P) Ltd.<\/i> v. Kushalraj Land Developers (P) Ltd.<\/i>, (2025) 1 SCC 527<\/a>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Consumer Protection — Consumer\/Consumer Dispute\/Locus Standi — “Commercial purpose”:<\/span> Purchase of vehicle by Company for personal use of its Director would not amount to purchase for commercial purpose, [Daimler Chrysler (India) (P) Ltd.<\/i> v. Controls & Switchgear Co. Ltd.<\/i>, (2025) 1 SCC 534<\/a>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Education Law — Employment and Service Matters re Educational Institutions — Pay\/Salary:<\/span> In case of anomaly in pay of appellant-petitioners qua their juniors, stepping up of pay of government employee on basis of pay of his junior in terms of R. 21 of the 2002 Rules, not applicable, [Maheshkumar Chandulal Patel<\/i> v. State of Gujarat<\/i>, (2025) 1 SCC 490<\/a>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016<\/a> — Ss. 33<\/a> to 35<\/a> — Liquidation of corporate debtor — Auction-sale:<\/span> Grant of extended time Grant of extended time to successful auction-purchaser to make balance sale consideration, in view of COVID Pandemic, permissible, [V.S. Palanivel<\/i> v. Sri Lakshmi Hotels (P) Ltd. (Liquidator)<\/i>, (2025) 1 SCC 559<\/a>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Limitation Act, 1963<\/a> — S. 5<\/a> — Condonation of delay — “Sufficient cause” — Determination — Liberal\/Justice-oriented approach — Necessity:<\/span> Not length of delay but cause for delay relevant while considering application for condonation of delay. Where cause for delay falls within four corners of “sufficient cause”, irrespective of length of delay same deserves to be condoned. However, where cause shown is insufficient, irrespective of period of delay same would not be condoned, [Mool Chandra<\/i> v. Union of India<\/i>, (2025) 1 SCC 625<\/a>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988<\/a> — Ss. 166<\/a> to 168<\/a> — Permanent disablement of school-going child — Manner in which compensation is to be quantified — Law clarified:<\/span> Adoption of minimum wages payable to unskilled labour for computation of compensation in case of permanent disablement of school-going child, not proper. Adoption of minimum wages payable to skilled workman, is a better basis, [Rushi<\/i> v. Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd.<\/i>, (2025) 1 SCC 635<\/a>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Penal Code, 1860<\/a> — S. 304<\/a> Pt. II r\/w S. 149<\/a> — Acquittal — Liability of acquitted respondent:<\/span> Acquittal confirmed in absence of proof of any assault\/participation, [Union of India<\/i> v. M.S. Mander<\/i>, (2025) 1 SCC 520<\/a>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Penal Code, 1860<\/a> — Ss. 342<\/a>, 347<\/a>, 504<\/a>, 506<\/a>, 116<\/a> and 384<\/a> r\/w S. 34<\/a> — Quashing of FIR:<\/span> Quashing of FIR, justified due to delay in lodging FIR and absence of allegations ascribing specific role, [Aruna Dhanyakumar Doshi<\/i> v. State of Telangana<\/i>, (2025) 1 SCC 485<\/a>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — S. 11(6) — Substantive claims of petitioner whether time-barred i.e. issue of limitation requiring intricate evidentiary <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":340138,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[5,16],"tags":[40741,46070,11241,31387,39497,19791],"class_list":["post-340126","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casesreported","category-supremecourtcases","tag-arbitration-and-conciliation-act-1996","tag-consumer-dispute","tag-consumer-protection","tag-insolvency-and-bankruptcy-code-2016","tag-limitation-act-1963","tag-motor-vehicles-act"],"yoast_head":"\n2025 SCC Vol. 1 Part 4 | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 \u2014 S. 11(6) \u2014 Substantive claims of petitioner whether time-barred i.e. issue of limitation requiring\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/31\/2025-scc-vol-1-part-4\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"2025 SCC Vol. 1 Part 4\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 \u2014 S. 11(6) \u2014 Substantive claims of petitioner whether time-barred i.e. issue of limitation requiring\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/31\/2025-scc-vol-1-part-4\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-01-31T03:30:53+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/2025-SCC-Vol.-1-Part-4.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"2025 SCC Vol. 1 Part 4\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/31\/2025-scc-vol-1-part-4\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/31\/2025-scc-vol-1-part-4\/\",\"name\":\"2025 SCC Vol. 1 Part 4 | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/31\/2025-scc-vol-1-part-4\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/31\/2025-scc-vol-1-part-4\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/2025-SCC-Vol.-1-Part-4.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-01-31T03:30:53+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"description\":\"Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 \u2014 S. 11(6) \u2014 Substantive claims of petitioner whether time-barred i.e. issue of limitation requiring\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/31\/2025-scc-vol-1-part-4\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/31\/2025-scc-vol-1-part-4\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/31\/2025-scc-vol-1-part-4\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/2025-SCC-Vol.-1-Part-4.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/2025-SCC-Vol.-1-Part-4.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"2025 SCC Vol. 1 Part 4\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/31\/2025-scc-vol-1-part-4\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"2025 SCC Vol. 1 Part 4\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"2025 SCC Vol. 1 Part 4 | SCC Times","description":"Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 \u2014 S. 11(6) \u2014 Substantive claims of petitioner whether time-barred i.e. issue of limitation requiring","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/31\/2025-scc-vol-1-part-4\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"2025 SCC Vol. 1 Part 4","og_description":"Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 \u2014 S. 11(6) \u2014 Substantive claims of petitioner whether time-barred i.e. issue of limitation requiring","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/31\/2025-scc-vol-1-part-4\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2025-01-31T03:30:53+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/2025-SCC-Vol.-1-Part-4.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"2025 SCC Vol. 1 Part 4","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/31\/2025-scc-vol-1-part-4\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/31\/2025-scc-vol-1-part-4\/","name":"2025 SCC Vol. 1 Part 4 | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/31\/2025-scc-vol-1-part-4\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/31\/2025-scc-vol-1-part-4\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/2025-SCC-Vol.-1-Part-4.webp","datePublished":"2025-01-31T03:30:53+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"description":"Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 \u2014 S. 11(6) \u2014 Substantive claims of petitioner whether time-barred i.e. issue of limitation requiring","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/31\/2025-scc-vol-1-part-4\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/31\/2025-scc-vol-1-part-4\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/31\/2025-scc-vol-1-part-4\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/2025-SCC-Vol.-1-Part-4.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/2025-SCC-Vol.-1-Part-4.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"2025 SCC Vol. 1 Part 4"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/31\/2025-scc-vol-1-part-4\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"2025 SCC Vol. 1 Part 4"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/2025-SCC-Vol.-1-Part-4.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":334978,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/13\/referral-court-scope-of-enquiry-limitation-period-arbitration-petition-sc-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":340126,"position":0},"title":"Under Section 11(6) A&C Act, Referral Court must limit its enquiry to the question of limitation period only: SC","author":"Sucheta","date":"November 13, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Referral courts, at the stage of deciding an application for appointment of arbitrator, must not conduct an intricate evidentiary enquiry into the question whether the claims raised by the applicant are time barred.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"arbitration referral court enquiry limitation","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/arbitration-referral-court-enquiry-limitation.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/arbitration-referral-court-enquiry-limitation.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/arbitration-referral-court-enquiry-limitation.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/arbitration-referral-court-enquiry-limitation.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":336390,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/12\/02\/arbitration-law-roundup-quick-recap-top-arbitration-cases-november-2024-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":340126,"position":1},"title":"Arbitration Law Roundup: A quick recap of the top arbitration cases from November 2024","author":"Editor","date":"December 2, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Top arbitration cases on unilateral appointment, seat of arbitration, limitation period, scope of judicial scrutiny and more.","rel":"","context":"In "Legal RoundUp"","block_context":{"text":"Legal RoundUp","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/columns-for-roundup\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Arbitration Law Roundup November","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/Arbitration-Law-Roundup-November.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/Arbitration-Law-Roundup-November.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/Arbitration-Law-Roundup-November.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/Arbitration-Law-Roundup-November.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":316230,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/06\/3-years-long-period-filing-application-appointing-arbitrator-supreme-court-suggests-parliament-bring-amendment-prescribing-limitation\/","url_meta":{"origin":340126,"position":2},"title":"\u20183 years is a long period for filing application for appointing arbitrator\u2019; SC suggests Parliament to bring amendment prescribing specific limitation period","author":"Apoorva","date":"March 6, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court, while allowing the present petition, appointed Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Former Judge of the Supreme Court of India, to act as the sole arbitrator.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"limitation period","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/limitation-period.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/limitation-period.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/limitation-period.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/limitation-period.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":308662,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/07\/section-434-of-arbitration-and-conciliation-act-1996-does-not-create-new-window-after-expiry-of-limitation-calcutta-high-court-scc-blog\/","url_meta":{"origin":340126,"position":3},"title":"Section 43(4) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 does not create new window after expiry of limitation: Calcutta High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"December 7, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe limitation for filing an application will start to run from the day when the cause of action accrues regardless of the existence of an arbitration clause.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":332385,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/04\/whether-the-law-of-limitation-is-applicable-to-the-claims-under-the-msmed-act-2006\/","url_meta":{"origin":340126,"position":4},"title":"Whether the Law of Limitation is Applicable to the Claims under the MSMED Act, 2006","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 4, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"by Aparna Ramesh Devkar","rel":"","context":"In "Op Eds"","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Law of Limitation","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Law-of-Limitation.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Law-of-Limitation.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Law-of-Limitation.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Law-of-Limitation.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":245314,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/10\/3-years-limitation-period-unduly-long-necessary-for-parliament-to-fill-the-vacuum-by-prescribing-a-specific-period-of-limitation-under-section-11-of-the-arbitration-and-conciliation-1996-sc\/","url_meta":{"origin":340126,"position":5},"title":"3 years’ limitation period ‘unduly long’; Necessary for Parliament to fill the vacuum by prescribing a specific period of limitation under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation 1996: SC","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"March 10, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"3 years is an unduly long period for filing an application under Section 11, since it would defeat the very object of the Act, which provides for expeditious resolution of commercial disputes within a time bound period.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/340126","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=340126"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/340126\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/340138"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=340126"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=340126"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=340126"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}