{"id":339825,"date":"2025-01-27T17:30:32","date_gmt":"2025-01-27T12:00:32","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=339825"},"modified":"2025-01-29T14:44:32","modified_gmt":"2025-01-29T09:14:32","slug":"hc-jurisdiction-decide-election-dispute-caste-returned-candidate-sc-stay-order-legal-news","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/27\/hc-jurisdiction-decide-election-dispute-caste-returned-candidate-sc-stay-order-legal-news\/","title":{"rendered":"SC stays proceedings before Karnataka HC deciding HC&#8217;s jurisdiction to decide election dispute questioning caste of a returned candidate"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Supreme Court:<\/span> While considering the instant petition filed against a decision of Karnataka High Court in <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">G. Swamy v. B. Devendrappa<\/span><a id=\"fnref1\" href=\"#fn1\" title=\"1. Election Petition No. 19 of 2023\"><sup>1<\/sup><\/a>, wherein it had held that the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9002071069\" target=\"_blank\">Karnataka Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes and Other Backward Classes (Reservation of Appointments, etc.) Act, 1990<\/a>, does not take away the jurisdiction of the High Court, to decide an election dispute questioning the caste of a returned candidate to the Legislative Assembly; the Division Bench of Surya Kant and N. Kotiswar Singh, JJ., put a stay on further proceedings in <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">G. Swamy<\/span> (supra).<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The respondent in the matter herein, had questioned the petitioner&#8217;s election to Jagaluru Vidhan Sabha Constituency. The constituency in question is reserved for Scheduled Tribe. According to the respondent, the petitioner did not belong to Scheduled Tribe but belonged to the Other Backward Community, and therefore is ineligible to contest the election<\/p>\n<p>,<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Single Judge Bench of Ananth Ramanath Hegde, J., in his judgment dated 13-12-2024, had rejected the Election Petition. The Court had observed that the caste certificate issued under Rule 3A(2)(3) of the Karnataka Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and Other Backward Classes (Reservation of appointments etc.,) Rules, 1992, though does not specify that the certificate would apply only for employment and admission to educational institutions, since the Act of 1990 in terms of Section 4, provides for issuance of certificate for appointment to any office in a civil service or civil post in the State of Karnataka and Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9002071044\" target=\"_blank\">4-A<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9002071069\" target=\"_blank\">Act of 1990<\/a> provides for issuance of certificate to secure admission to any educational institution, the certificate issued under the Rules of 1992 cannot traverse beyond the scope of the parent Act of 1990. Hence, the certificate issued under the Rules of 1992 has nothing to do with the certificate issued for election to the legislative assembly.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The High Court had further pointed out that the State has not enacted any law or provision overstepping its legislative competence to curtail the scope of Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001558837\" target=\"_blank\">80<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001558838\" target=\"_blank\">80-A<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002801315\" target=\"_blank\">Representation of the People Act, 1951<\/a>. This being the position there is no scope to raise a contention that in view of the Act of 1990, the High Court cannot decide the issue concerning the returned candidate&#8217;s caste.<\/p>\n<p><!--\n\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">B. Devendrappa v. G. Swamy, SLP No. 1930\/2025, decided on 24-1-2025<\/span>]<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n<hr\/>\n\n\n\n\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For Petitioner(s):<\/span> Mr. V.M Kannan, AOR Mr. A. Mahesh Chowdhary, Adv. Ms. Harimohana N., Adv. Mr. Mayank Singh, Adv. Ms. Rashi Singh, Adv.<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For Respondent(s):<\/span> Ms. Pramila Nesargi, Sr. Adv. Mr. Balaji Srinivasan, AOR Ms. Harsha Tripathi, Adv. Mr. Praveenn Nath S., Adv.<\/p>\n\n--><\/p>\n<div style=\"text-overflow: ellipsis; background-color: #92A8D1; text-align:justify; clear:both; text-size-adjust: auto; overflow: auto;\">\n<p style=\"font-size: 18pt; margin-top: 5px; text-align: center;\">CASE DETAILS<\/p>\n<table width=\"100%\" style=\"word-wrap: break-word; border-collapse:collapse; table-layout: fixed; margin-top: 10px;\">\n<colgroup>\n<col width=\"41%\"\/>\n<col width=\"59%\"\/>\n<\/colgroup>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td valign=\"top\">\n<p><span style=\"color: #D4E4F7; font-weight: bold;\">Citation:<\/span><br \/> <span style=\"color: #D4E4F7; font-size: 10pt;\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/GBUb7Bds\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2025 SCC OnLine SC 169<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #D4E4F7; font-weight: bold;\">Appellants&#160;:<\/span><br \/> B. Devendrappa<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #D4E4F7; font-weight: bold;\">Respondents&#160;:<\/span><br \/> G. Swamy<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td valign=\"top\">\n<p style=\"color: #D4E4F7; font-weight: bold;\">Advocates who appeared in this case<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #D4E4F7; font-weight: bold;\">For Petitioner(s):<\/span><br \/> Mr. V.M Kannan, AOR Mr. A. Mahesh Chowdhary, Adv. Ms. Harimohana N., Adv. Mr. Mayank Singh, Adv. Ms. Rashi Singh, Adv.<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #D4E4F7; font-weight: bold;\">For Respondent(s):<\/span><br \/> Ms. Pramila Nesargi, Sr. Adv. Mr. Balaji Srinivasan, AOR Ms. Harsha Tripathi, Adv. Mr. Praveenn Nath S., Adv.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p style=\"font-size: 12pt; margin-top: -20px; margin-left: 5px;\"><span style=\"color: #D4E4F7; font-weight: bold;\">CORAM&#160;:<\/span><\/p>\n<div id=\"banner\" style=\"overflow: hidden; display: flex; justify-content: space-between; padding-left: 3%;\">\n<div class=\"\" style=\"max-width: 100%; max-height: 100%; font-size: 9pt; text-align: center;\">\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" height=\"100px\" width=\"100px\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scobserver.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/18.-Kant-modified-2048x2048.png\" alt=\"Surya Kant, J.\" style=\"border-radius: 50%;\"><br \/><span style=\"color: black !important;\">Surya Kant, J.<\/span><\/img><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"\" style=\"max-width: 100%; max-height: 100%; font-size: 9pt; text-align: center;\">\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" height=\"100px\" width=\"100px\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scobserver.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/N.-Kotiswar-modified.png\" alt=\"N. Kotiswar Singh, J.\" style=\"border-radius: 50%;\"><br \/><span style=\"color: black !important;\">N. Kotiswar Singh, J.<\/span><\/img><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"\" style=\"max-width: 100%; max-height: 100%;\"><\/div>\n<div class=\"\" style=\"max-width: 100%; max-height: 100%;\"><\/div>\n<div class=\"\" style=\"max-width: 100%; max-height: 100%;\"><\/div>\n<div class=\"\" style=\"max-width: 100%; max-height: 100%;\"><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<hr\/>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn1\" href=\"#fnref1\">1.<\/a> Election Petition No. 19 of 2023<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">The matter revolved around the respondent questioning the petitioner&#8217;s election to Jagaluru Vidhan Sabha Constituency contending that the petitioner did not belong to Scheduled Tribe but belonged to the Other Backward Community.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":339864,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,9],"tags":[18961,49133,3798,77915,77918,2672,77916,73049,5363,77917],"class_list":["post-339825","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-supremecourt","tag-caste-certificate","tag-election-dispute","tag-election_petition","tag-electoral-matters","tag-jagaluru-vidhan-sabha-constituency","tag-reservation","tag-reserved-constituency","tag-returned-candidate","tag-supreme-court","tag-vidhan-sabha"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>SC stays proceedings in a Karnataka HC case on HC&#039;s jurisdiction to decide election dispute questioning caste of a returned candidate<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"The matter revolved around the respondent questioning the petitioner&#039;s election to Jagaluru Vidhan Sabha Constituency.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/27\/hc-jurisdiction-decide-election-dispute-caste-returned-candidate-sc-stay-order-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"SC stays proceedings before Karnataka HC deciding HC&#039;s jurisdiction to decide election dispute questioning caste of a returned candidate\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The matter revolved around the respondent questioning the petitioner&#039;s election to Jagaluru Vidhan Sabha Constituency.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/27\/hc-jurisdiction-decide-election-dispute-caste-returned-candidate-sc-stay-order-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-01-27T12:00:32+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-01-29T09:14:32+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/shared-image-2025-01-27T190139.636.jpeg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"SC stays proceedings before Karnataka HC deciding HC&#039;s jurisdiction to decide election dispute questioning caste of a returned candidate\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/27\/hc-jurisdiction-decide-election-dispute-caste-returned-candidate-sc-stay-order-legal-news\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/27\/hc-jurisdiction-decide-election-dispute-caste-returned-candidate-sc-stay-order-legal-news\/\",\"name\":\"SC stays proceedings in a Karnataka HC case on HC's jurisdiction to decide election dispute questioning caste of a returned candidate\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/27\/hc-jurisdiction-decide-election-dispute-caste-returned-candidate-sc-stay-order-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/27\/hc-jurisdiction-decide-election-dispute-caste-returned-candidate-sc-stay-order-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/shared-image-2025-01-27T190139.636.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-01-27T12:00:32+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-01-29T09:14:32+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\"},\"description\":\"The matter revolved around the respondent questioning the petitioner's election to Jagaluru Vidhan Sabha Constituency.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/27\/hc-jurisdiction-decide-election-dispute-caste-returned-candidate-sc-stay-order-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/27\/hc-jurisdiction-decide-election-dispute-caste-returned-candidate-sc-stay-order-legal-news\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/27\/hc-jurisdiction-decide-election-dispute-caste-returned-candidate-sc-stay-order-legal-news\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/shared-image-2025-01-27T190139.636.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/shared-image-2025-01-27T190139.636.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"election dispute caste of returned candidate\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/27\/hc-jurisdiction-decide-election-dispute-caste-returned-candidate-sc-stay-order-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"SC stays proceedings before Karnataka HC deciding HC&#8217;s jurisdiction to decide election dispute questioning caste of a returned candidate\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\",\"name\":\"Sucheta\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Sucheta\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"SC stays proceedings in a Karnataka HC case on HC's jurisdiction to decide election dispute questioning caste of a returned candidate","description":"The matter revolved around the respondent questioning the petitioner's election to Jagaluru Vidhan Sabha Constituency.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/27\/hc-jurisdiction-decide-election-dispute-caste-returned-candidate-sc-stay-order-legal-news\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"SC stays proceedings before Karnataka HC deciding HC's jurisdiction to decide election dispute questioning caste of a returned candidate","og_description":"The matter revolved around the respondent questioning the petitioner's election to Jagaluru Vidhan Sabha Constituency.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/27\/hc-jurisdiction-decide-election-dispute-caste-returned-candidate-sc-stay-order-legal-news\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2025-01-27T12:00:32+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-01-29T09:14:32+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/shared-image-2025-01-27T190139.636.jpeg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Sucheta","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"SC stays proceedings before Karnataka HC deciding HC's jurisdiction to decide election dispute questioning caste of a returned candidate","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Sucheta","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/27\/hc-jurisdiction-decide-election-dispute-caste-returned-candidate-sc-stay-order-legal-news\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/27\/hc-jurisdiction-decide-election-dispute-caste-returned-candidate-sc-stay-order-legal-news\/","name":"SC stays proceedings in a Karnataka HC case on HC's jurisdiction to decide election dispute questioning caste of a returned candidate","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/27\/hc-jurisdiction-decide-election-dispute-caste-returned-candidate-sc-stay-order-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/27\/hc-jurisdiction-decide-election-dispute-caste-returned-candidate-sc-stay-order-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/shared-image-2025-01-27T190139.636.webp","datePublished":"2025-01-27T12:00:32+00:00","dateModified":"2025-01-29T09:14:32+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa"},"description":"The matter revolved around the respondent questioning the petitioner's election to Jagaluru Vidhan Sabha Constituency.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/27\/hc-jurisdiction-decide-election-dispute-caste-returned-candidate-sc-stay-order-legal-news\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/27\/hc-jurisdiction-decide-election-dispute-caste-returned-candidate-sc-stay-order-legal-news\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/27\/hc-jurisdiction-decide-election-dispute-caste-returned-candidate-sc-stay-order-legal-news\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/shared-image-2025-01-27T190139.636.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/shared-image-2025-01-27T190139.636.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"election dispute caste of returned candidate"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/27\/hc-jurisdiction-decide-election-dispute-caste-returned-candidate-sc-stay-order-legal-news\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"SC stays proceedings before Karnataka HC deciding HC&#8217;s jurisdiction to decide election dispute questioning caste of a returned candidate"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa","name":"Sucheta","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Sucheta"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/shared-image-2025-01-27T190139.636.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":330674,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/12\/bomhc-dismisses-plea-challenging-congress-mp-shivaji-bandappa-kalges-election\/","url_meta":{"origin":339825,"position":0},"title":"\u2018Petitions bereft of material particulars\u2019; Bombay HC dismisses plea challenging Congress MP Shivaji Bandappa Kalge\u2019s election","author":"Simranjeet","date":"September 12, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Enquiry cannot be conducted in the status of Shivaji Bandappa Kalge, the returned candidate and he cannot be declared as not belonging to \u201cMala Jangam\u201d community scheduled caste as he has a caste validity certificate in his favour by the Caste Scrutiny Committee which has exclusive jurisdiction to grant the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Bombay High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":265326,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/12\/election\/","url_meta":{"origin":339825,"position":1},"title":"Kar HC quotes \u201cThe Vajpayee led NDA\u2013Government was toppled for want of one vote\u201d and Benjamin Franklin while deciding a case of a returning candidate whose election was set aside","author":"Editor","date":"April 12, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201c\u2026A right to elect, fundamental though it is to democracy, is, anomalously enough, neither a fundamental right nor a Common Law Right. It is pure and simple, a statutory right. So is the right to be elected. So is the right to dispute an election.\u201d Karnataka High Court: Krishna S.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Karnataka High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/New_Karnataka.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/New_Karnataka.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/New_Karnataka.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/New_Karnataka.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/New_Karnataka.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":327885,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/02\/2024-lok-sabha-elections-mp-hc-issues-notice-to-khandwa-bjp-mp-gyaneshwar-patil-for-filling-alleged-false-affidavit-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":339825,"position":2},"title":"2024 Lok Sabha elections | MP High Court issues notice to Khandwa BJP MP Gyaneshwar Patil for allegedly filling \u2018false affidavit\u2019","author":"Ritu","date":"August 2, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Congress candidate Narendra Patel filed an election petition alleging that the BJP MP Gyaneshwar Patil suppressed material information in his affidavit in the 2024 Lok Sabha elections for the Khandwa constituency.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madhya Pradesh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":75971,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/10\/04\/election-of-rajendra-meshram-to-desar-constituency-in-madhya-pradesh-upheld\/","url_meta":{"origin":339825,"position":3},"title":"Election of Rajendra Meshram to Deosar Constituency in Madhya Pradesh, upheld","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"October 4, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: Holding the election of Rajendra Meshram to be valid, the Court said that the trial of an election petition, as per Section 87 of the Representation of People Act, 1951 has to be in accordance with the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. When no pleadings\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":287520,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/23\/kerala-hc-voids-election-of-a-raja-to-kerala-legislative-assembly-2021-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":339825,"position":4},"title":"Kerala High Court declares election of A. Raja, void","author":"Ridhi","date":"March 23, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court found the records of family register conspicuous showing an attempt to fabricate evidence of professing Christianity by A. Raja, who was elected to a seat of Kerala Legislative Assembly reserved for members of Scheduled Caste in Kerala.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Kerala High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-764.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-764.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-764.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-764.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":240388,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/09\/who-is-a-duly-nominated-candidate-an-explainer-by-the-supreme-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":339825,"position":5},"title":"Who is a duly nominated candidate? An explainer by the Supreme Court","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"December 9, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: The 3-judge bench of SA Bobde, CJ* and AS Bopanna and V. Ramasubramanian, JJ, while upholding Allahabad High Court\u2019s order dismissing the petition challenging the election of Prime Minister Narendra Modi to the 17th Lok Sabha from 77th Parliamentary Constituency (Varanasi), held in April \u2013 May 2019, explained\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/339825","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=339825"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/339825\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/339864"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=339825"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=339825"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=339825"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}