{"id":339655,"date":"2025-01-24T09:00:03","date_gmt":"2025-01-24T03:30:03","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=339655"},"modified":"2025-01-27T17:19:48","modified_gmt":"2025-01-27T11:49:48","slug":"maintainability-art-226-petition-msefc-order-matter-referred-5judge-bench-sc-legal-news","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/24\/maintainability-art-226-petition-msefc-order-matter-referred-5judge-bench-sc-legal-news\/","title":{"rendered":"SC 5-Judge Bench to decide if writ under Art. 226 would be maintainable against an order passed by Micro and Small Enterprises Facilitation Council"},"content":{"rendered":"<style>\n.animate-charcter{background-image: linear-gradient(-225deg, #231557 0%, #44107a 29%, #ff1361 67%, #fff800 100%); background-size: 200% auto; -webkit-background-clip: text; -webkit-text-fill-color: transparent; animation: textclip 0s linear infinite;}\n@keyframes textclip {to {background-position: 200% center;}}\n<\/style>\n<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Supreme Court:<\/span> While considering the instant matter wherein the Court had to consider whether a writ petition under Article <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001574969\" target=\"_blank\">226<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\" target=\"_blank\">Constitution<\/a> would be maintainable against an order passed by the Micro and Small Enterprises Facilitation Council (MSEFC) in exercise of power under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001546080\" target=\"_blank\">18<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002942157\" target=\"_blank\">Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006<\/a> (MSMED Act) and if yes, then under what circumstances; the 3-Judge Bench of <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Sanjiv Khanna, CJ*<\/span>., Sanjay Kumar and Manmohan, JJ., deemed it fit to refer the matter to a larger bench of 5 Judges. The Court identified the following issues to be determined by a larger Bench:<\/p>\n<ol style=\"list-style-type: decimal;\">\n<li>\n<p>Whether the ratio in <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">India Glycols Limited v. Micro and Small Enterprises Facilitation Council, Medchal &#8212; Malkajgiri<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/pXv2ydNU\" target=\"_blank\">2023 SCC OnLine SC 1852<\/a>, that a writ petition could never be entertained against any order\/award of the MSEFC, completely bars or prohibits maintainability of the writ petition before the High Court?<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p>If the bar\/prohibition is not absolute, when and under what circumstances will the principle\/restriction of adequate alternative remedy not apply?<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Whether the members of MSEFC who undertake conciliation proceedings, upon failure, can themselves act as arbitrators of the arbitral tribunal in terms of Section 18 of the MSMED Act read with Section 80 of the A&amp;C Act?<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court clarified that the 1<span style=\"vertical-align: super;\">st<\/span> and 2<span style=\"vertical-align: super;\">nd<\/span> question will subsume the question of when and in what situation a writ petition can be entertained against an order\/award passed by MSEFC acting as an arbitral tribunal or conciliator.<\/p>\n<h3>Background:<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Tamil Nadu Cements Corporation Limited (TANCEM) is a wholly owned undertaking of the Government of Tamil Nadu. For the units at Ariyalur, TANCEM had called for tender on 27-01-2010 on turnkey basis for design, supply, erection and commissioning of two Electrostatic Precipitators for clinker coolers at a total contract value of Rs.7.50 crores under the provisions of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9000730918\" target=\"_blank\">Tamil Nadu Transparency in Tenders Act, 1998<\/a> and the Tamil Nadu Transparency in Tenders Rules, 2000. On 16-4-2010, TANCEM issued a work order in favour of Unicon Engineers for design, supply, erection and commissioning of two ESPs for clinker coolers at Ariyalur Cement Works on turnkey basis for the total value of Rs.7,50,60,543\/- as per drawing and specification mentioned in tender documents. It was stated that Unicon Engineers failed to deliver on its promise to build and commission the ESPs as undertaken.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Several warning letters were issued by TANCEM to Unicorn Engineers for delay in execution of civil works; furthermore, TANCEM sent a letter indicating the deadline to finish the works and raised concerns over the substandard quality of work done for the ESPs, which on inspection were found not to be in accordance with the contractual stipulations.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Along with a slew of several litigations and claims between the parties, TANCEM preferred the instant petition before the Supreme Court.<\/p>\n<h3>Court&#8217;s Assessment:<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Perusing the issues involved in the instant petition, the Court observed that Division Bench of the Supreme Court in <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Jharkhand Urja Vikas Nigam Limited v. State of Rajasthan<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/0fYoSvC3\" target=\"_blank\">(2021) 19 SCC 206<\/a> had held that MSEFC is obliged to conduct conciliation for which the provisions of Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001544973\" target=\"_blank\">65<\/a> to <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001544991\" target=\"_blank\">81<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726958\" target=\"_blank\">Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996<\/a> would apply, as if the conciliation was initiated under Part III of the said Act. Under Section 18(3), when conciliation fails and stands terminated, the dispute between the parties can be resolved by arbitration. The Council is empowered either to take up arbitration on its own or to refer the arbitration proceedings to any institution as specified in the said section. It is open to the Council to arbitrate and pass an award, after following the procedure under the relevant provisions of the A&amp;C Act, 1996, particularly Sections 20, 23, 24 and 25.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">However, the Court also observed that <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Gujarat State Civil Supplies Corporation Limited v. Mahakali Foods Private Limited (Unit 2)<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/211nlFT5\" target=\"_blank\">(2023) 6 SCC 401<\/a>, did not take note of <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Jharkhand Urja Vikas Nigam Limited (supra)<\/span> observed that the specific non-obstante clauses in of Section 18(1) and (4) of the MSMED Act have the effect of overriding any other law for the time being in force, including the A&amp;C Act, and, consequently, the MSEFC can act as a conciliator, and thereupon itself take up the dispute for arbitration or refer it to any institution or centre for such arbitration.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court further took note of <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">India Glycols Limited v. Micro and Small Enterprises Facilitation Council, Medchal &#8212; Malkajgiri<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/pXv2ydNU\" target=\"_blank\">2023 SCC OnLine SC 1852<\/a>, held that a writ petition under Articles <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001574969\" target=\"_blank\">226<\/a>\/<a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001574971\" target=\"_blank\">227<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\" target=\"_blank\">Constitution<\/a> was not maintainable as Section 18 of the MSMED Act provides for recourse to a statutory remedy for challenging an award under Section 34 of the A&amp;C Act and that too would require a deposit in terms of Section 19 of the A&amp;C Act.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Perusing Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001546077\" target=\"_blank\">15<\/a> to <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001546080\" target=\"_blank\">18<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002942157\" target=\"_blank\">MSMED Act<\/a>, the Court opined that <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">there is a direct confrontation<\/span> between the judgment of the two Judges Bench of Supreme Court in <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Jharkhand Urja Vikas Nigam Limited (supra)<\/span> and <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Gujarat State Civil Supplies Corporation Limited (supra)<\/span>. <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">The Court also expressed its reservations<\/span> on the dictum in <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">India Glycols Limited (supra).<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court explained that the instant matter is a case of statutory arbitration that is mandatory. It is possible to argue that it bars a party from moving to the Court of law under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001523840\" target=\"_blank\">9<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726944\" target=\"_blank\">Code of Civil Procedure, 1908<\/a>. Section 18 also overrides the principle of party autonomy when they enter into an arbitration agreement which prescribes the procedure for the appointment of an arbitrator and conduct of arbitral proceedings. The statute further prescribes an undoubtedly high rate of interest.<\/p>\n<p class=\"animate-charcter\" style=\"margin-left: 36pt; margin-bottom: 3%; font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;\">&#8220;The issue therefore which arises and needs consideration is whether there would be an absolute and complete bar to invoke writ jurisdiction under Article <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001574969\" target=\"_blank\">226<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\" target=\"_blank\">Constitution<\/a> even in exceptional and rare cases where fairness, equity and justice may warrant the exercise of writ jurisdiction&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Analysing the writ jurisdiction of the High Court under Article <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001574969\" target=\"_blank\">226<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\" target=\"_blank\">Constitution<\/a>, the Court pointed out that the access to High Courts under Article 226 is not just a constitutional right, but it is also a part of the basic structure of the Constitution. &#8220;<span style=\"font-style: italic;\">This is an inalienable right and the rule of availability of alternative remedy is not an omnibus rule of exclusion of the writ jurisdiction, but a principle applied by the High Courts as a form of judicial restraint and refrain in exercising the jurisdiction<\/span>&#8221;. The Court also pointed out that it is a well settled law that in certain contingencies, the writ Courts may exercise their writ jurisdiction despite the availability of alternative remedy.<\/p>\n<p class=\"animate-charcter\" style=\"margin-left: 36pt; margin-bottom: 3%; font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;\">&#8220;Noticeably, the MSEFC as a statutory authority performs a statutory role and functions within the four corners of the law&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Henceforth, with the aforesaid analysis and noticing the conflicting dictums of the Division Bench of the Supreme Court in the afore-stated referred cases, the Court therefore deemed it fit to refer the issues to a 5-Judge Bench.<\/p>\n<p><!--\n\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Tamil Nadu Cements Corporation Limited v. Micro and Small Enterprises Facilitation Council, Diary No.3776 of 2023, decided on 22-1-2025<\/span>]<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000080;\">*Judgment by Justice Sanjiv Khanna, the Chief Justice of India<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n<hr\/>\n\n\n\n\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For Petitioner(s)<\/span> Mr. K. Radhakrishnan, Sr. Adv. Mr. K.V. Jagdishvaran, Adv. Ms. G. Indira, AOR Mr. P. Gandepan, Adv. Mr. Ashwini Kumar, Adv<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For Respondent(s)<\/span> Mr. Senthil Jagadeesan, Sr. Adv. Mr. E. Om Prakash, Sr. Adv. Mr. Kaushitaki Sharma, Adv. Ms. Hima Bhardwaj, Adv. Ms. Mrinal Kanwar, AOR Mr. Vaibhav, Adv. Mr. Puneet Agarwwal, Adv.<\/p>\n\n--><\/p>\n<div style=\"text-overflow: ellipsis; background-color: #92A8D1; text-align:justify; clear:both; text-size-adjust: auto; overflow: auto;\">\n<p style=\"font-size: 18pt; margin-top: 5px; text-align: center;\">CASE DETAILS<\/p>\n<table width=\"100%\" style=\"word-wrap: break-word; border-collapse:collapse; table-layout: fixed; margin-top: 10px;\">\n<colgroup>\n<col width=\"41%\"\/>\n<col width=\"59%\"\/>\n<\/colgroup>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td valign=\"top\">\n<p><span style=\"color: #D4E4F7; font-weight: bold;\">Citation:<\/span><br \/> <span style=\"color: #D4E4F7; font-size: 10pt;\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/el0cM097\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2025 SCC OnLine SC 127<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #D4E4F7; font-weight: bold;\">Appellants&#160;:<\/span><br \/> Tamil Nadu Cements Corporation Limited<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #D4E4F7; font-weight: bold;\">Respondents&#160;:<\/span><br \/> Micro and Small Enterprises Facilitation Council<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td valign=\"top\">\n<p style=\"color: #D4E4F7; font-weight: bold;\">Advocates who appeared in this case<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #D4E4F7; font-weight: bold;\">For Petitioner(s):<\/span><br \/> Mr. K. Radhakrishnan, Sr. Adv. Mr. K.V. Jagdishvaran, Adv. Ms. G. Indira, AOR Mr. P. Gandepan, Adv. Mr. Ashwini Kumar, Adv<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #D4E4F7; font-weight: bold;\">For Respondent(s):<\/span><br \/> Mr. Senthil Jagadeesan, Sr. Adv. Mr. E. Om Prakash, Sr. Adv. Mr. Kaushitaki Sharma, Adv. Ms. Hima Bhardwaj, Adv. Ms. Mrinal Kanwar, AOR Mr. Vaibhav, Adv. Mr. Puneet Agarwwal, Adv.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p style=\"font-size: 12pt; margin-top: -20px; margin-left: 5px;\"><span style=\"color: #D4E4F7; font-weight: bold;\">CORAM&#160;:<\/span><\/p>\n<div id=\"banner\" style=\"overflow: hidden; display: flex; justify-content: space-between; padding-left: 3%;\">\n<div class=\"\" style=\"max-width: 100%; max-height: 100%; font-size: 9pt; text-align: center;\">\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/14\/know-your-judge-justice-sanjiv-khanna-supreme-court-of-india-legal-news\/\" target=\"_blank\"><img decoding=\"async\" height=\"100px\" width=\"100px\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scobserver.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/16.-Sanjiv_Khanna-modified.png\" alt=\"Sanjiv Khanna, CJ\" style=\"border-radius: 50%; border:2px solid #FF5733; padding: 1px;\"><br \/><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Sanjiv Khanna, CJ<\/span><\/img><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"\" style=\"max-width: 100%; max-height: 100%; font-size: 9pt; text-align: center;\">\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" height=\"100px\" width=\"100px\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scobserver.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/imageedit_23_3598949402-1.jpg\" alt=\"Sanjay Kumar, J.\" style=\"border-radius: 50%;\"><br \/><span style=\"color: black !important;\">Sanjay Kumar, J.<\/span><\/img><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"\" style=\"max-width: 100%; max-height: 100%; font-size: 9pt; text-align: center;\">\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" height=\"100px\" width=\"100px\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scobserver.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/Justice-Manmohan-Circle.png\" alt=\"Manmohan, J.\" style=\"border-radius: 50%;\"><br \/><span style=\"color: black !important;\">Manmohan, J.<\/span><\/img><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"\" style=\"max-width: 100%; max-height: 100%;\"><\/div>\n<div class=\"\" style=\"max-width: 100%; max-height: 100%;\"><\/div>\n<div class=\"\" style=\"max-width: 100%; max-height: 100%;\"><\/div>\n<div class=\"\" style=\"max-width: 100%; max-height: 100%;\"><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Constitution of India &nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product\/the-constitution-of-india-coat-pocket-edition?products_id=100647\" target=\"_blank\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product\/the-constitution-of-india-coat-pocket-edition?products_id=100647\" target=\"_blank\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/s3.amazonaws.com\/ebcwebstore\/images\/the-constitution-of-india-coat-pocket-edition-Gopal-Sankaranarayanan-ebc-front-cover.JPG\" alt=\"Constitution of India\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294438\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">The Court took note of the conflicting Division Bench decisions regarding whether a writ petition could be entertained against any order\/award of the MSEFC, and whether there is complete prohibition on maintainability of the writ petition before the High Court.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":339658,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,9],"tags":[22204,3226,75930,77838,77839,51198,50888,77840],"class_list":["post-339655","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-supremecourt","tag-alternate-remedy","tag-arbitration","tag-chief-justice-sanjiv-khanna","tag-micro-and-small-enterprises","tag-micro-and-small-enterprises-facilitation-council","tag-msmed-act","tag-reference-to-larger-bench","tag-tamil-nadu-cements-corporation"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Maintainability of Art. 226 petition against an order passed by the MSEFC; SC refers the matter to 5- Judge Bench<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"The Court took note of the conflicting Division Bench decisions regarding whether there is complete prohibition on maintainability of the writ petition before HC.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/24\/maintainability-art-226-petition-msefc-order-matter-referred-5judge-bench-sc-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"SC 5-Judge Bench to decide if writ under Art. 226 would be maintainable against an order passed by Micro and Small Enterprises Facilitation Council\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The Court took note of the conflicting Division Bench decisions regarding whether there is complete prohibition on maintainability of the writ petition before HC.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/24\/maintainability-art-226-petition-msefc-order-matter-referred-5judge-bench-sc-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-01-24T03:30:03+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-01-27T11:49:48+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/Art.-226-petition-MSEFC-5-judge-bench.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"SC 5-Judge Bench to decide if writ under Art. 226 would be maintainable against an order passed by Micro and Small Enterprises Facilitation Council\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/24\/maintainability-art-226-petition-msefc-order-matter-referred-5judge-bench-sc-legal-news\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/24\/maintainability-art-226-petition-msefc-order-matter-referred-5judge-bench-sc-legal-news\/\",\"name\":\"Maintainability of Art. 226 petition against an order passed by the MSEFC; SC refers the matter to 5- Judge Bench\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/24\/maintainability-art-226-petition-msefc-order-matter-referred-5judge-bench-sc-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/24\/maintainability-art-226-petition-msefc-order-matter-referred-5judge-bench-sc-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/Art.-226-petition-MSEFC-5-judge-bench.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-01-24T03:30:03+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-01-27T11:49:48+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\"},\"description\":\"The Court took note of the conflicting Division Bench decisions regarding whether there is complete prohibition on maintainability of the writ petition before HC.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/24\/maintainability-art-226-petition-msefc-order-matter-referred-5judge-bench-sc-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/24\/maintainability-art-226-petition-msefc-order-matter-referred-5judge-bench-sc-legal-news\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/24\/maintainability-art-226-petition-msefc-order-matter-referred-5judge-bench-sc-legal-news\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/Art.-226-petition-MSEFC-5-judge-bench.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/Art.-226-petition-MSEFC-5-judge-bench.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"Art. 226 petition MSEFC 5-judge bench\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/24\/maintainability-art-226-petition-msefc-order-matter-referred-5judge-bench-sc-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"SC 5-Judge Bench to decide if writ under Art. 226 would be maintainable against an order passed by Micro and Small Enterprises Facilitation Council\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\",\"name\":\"Sucheta\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Sucheta\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Maintainability of Art. 226 petition against an order passed by the MSEFC; SC refers the matter to 5- Judge Bench","description":"The Court took note of the conflicting Division Bench decisions regarding whether there is complete prohibition on maintainability of the writ petition before HC.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/24\/maintainability-art-226-petition-msefc-order-matter-referred-5judge-bench-sc-legal-news\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"SC 5-Judge Bench to decide if writ under Art. 226 would be maintainable against an order passed by Micro and Small Enterprises Facilitation Council","og_description":"The Court took note of the conflicting Division Bench decisions regarding whether there is complete prohibition on maintainability of the writ petition before HC.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/24\/maintainability-art-226-petition-msefc-order-matter-referred-5judge-bench-sc-legal-news\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2025-01-24T03:30:03+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-01-27T11:49:48+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/Art.-226-petition-MSEFC-5-judge-bench.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Sucheta","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"SC 5-Judge Bench to decide if writ under Art. 226 would be maintainable against an order passed by Micro and Small Enterprises Facilitation Council","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Sucheta","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/24\/maintainability-art-226-petition-msefc-order-matter-referred-5judge-bench-sc-legal-news\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/24\/maintainability-art-226-petition-msefc-order-matter-referred-5judge-bench-sc-legal-news\/","name":"Maintainability of Art. 226 petition against an order passed by the MSEFC; SC refers the matter to 5- Judge Bench","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/24\/maintainability-art-226-petition-msefc-order-matter-referred-5judge-bench-sc-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/24\/maintainability-art-226-petition-msefc-order-matter-referred-5judge-bench-sc-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/Art.-226-petition-MSEFC-5-judge-bench.webp","datePublished":"2025-01-24T03:30:03+00:00","dateModified":"2025-01-27T11:49:48+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa"},"description":"The Court took note of the conflicting Division Bench decisions regarding whether there is complete prohibition on maintainability of the writ petition before HC.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/24\/maintainability-art-226-petition-msefc-order-matter-referred-5judge-bench-sc-legal-news\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/24\/maintainability-art-226-petition-msefc-order-matter-referred-5judge-bench-sc-legal-news\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/24\/maintainability-art-226-petition-msefc-order-matter-referred-5judge-bench-sc-legal-news\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/Art.-226-petition-MSEFC-5-judge-bench.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/Art.-226-petition-MSEFC-5-judge-bench.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"Art. 226 petition MSEFC 5-judge bench"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/24\/maintainability-art-226-petition-msefc-order-matter-referred-5judge-bench-sc-legal-news\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"SC 5-Judge Bench to decide if writ under Art. 226 would be maintainable against an order passed by Micro and Small Enterprises Facilitation Council"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa","name":"Sucheta","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Sucheta"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/Art.-226-petition-MSEFC-5-judge-bench.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":292783,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/22\/calcutta-high-court-dismissed-writ-petition-ground-of-maintainability-scc-blog-legal-reseach-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":339655,"position":0},"title":"Supplier can refer to MSME Facilitation Council for adjudication despite post-contract MSME registration: Calcutta High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"May 22, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe MSMED Act of 2006 is a special statute as it was specifically enacted for facilitating the promotion and development of micro, small and medium Enterprises and enhancing their competitiveness.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":302639,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/29\/msme-interest-for-delayed-payment-allowed-principal-amount-already-paid-jharkhand-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":339655,"position":1},"title":"[MSMED Act] Interest for delayed payment allowed even if principal amount already paid: Jharkhand High Court","author":"Ridhi","date":"September 29, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe MSMED Act, 2006 is a beneficial legislation with an object to promote and develop micro, small and\/or medium enterprises, and the interpretation regarding a reference for the interest component alone would be in consonance with the object of the Act\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"jharkhand high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/jharkhand-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/jharkhand-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/jharkhand-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/jharkhand-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":370513,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/22\/one-cant-claim-fresh-remedy-under-art-226-after-availing-statutory-remedy-all-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":339655,"position":2},"title":"Fresh remedy under Article 226 barred once statutory remedy availed: Allahabad High Court rejects Writ after Assessee files rectification application under IT Act","author":"Sonali Ahuja","date":"December 22, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cWhen on the same facts, a person has the right to claim one of two reliefs and with full knowledge he elects to claim one and obtains it, it is not open to him thereafter to flunk out on his election and claim the alternative relief.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"fresh remedy under Art 226 after availing statutory remedy","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/fresh-remedy-under-Art-226-after-availing-statutory-remedy.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/fresh-remedy-under-Art-226-after-availing-statutory-remedy.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/fresh-remedy-under-Art-226-after-availing-statutory-remedy.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/fresh-remedy-under-Art-226-after-availing-statutory-remedy.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":335603,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/20\/awards-rendered-by-msme-council-only-be-challenged-under-section-34-arbitration-act-rissa-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":339655,"position":3},"title":"Awards rendered by MSME Council can be challenged under Section 34 of A&amp;C Act and not under Art. 226: Orissa High Court","author":"Editor","date":"November 20, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"In the matter at hand, the appellant contended that the Council\u2019s award ought to have been interfered with under Article 226\/227 of the Constitution, as there was no conciliation in accordance with the procedure prescribed, a condition precedent for initiation of arbitration proceeding under Section 18 (3) of the MSMED\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Orissa High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Orissa-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Orissa-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Orissa-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Orissa-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":313944,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/13\/award-facilitation-council-without-recording-failure-conciliation-reference-arbitration-nullity-jharkhand-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":339655,"position":4},"title":"Award by Facilitation Council without recording failure of conciliation or reference to arbitration void; Jharkhand High Court remits matter","author":"Ridhi","date":"February 13, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Jharkhand High Court noticed that the Facilitation Council proceeded with an award, with no record of failure of conciliation or parties going for arbitration.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"jharkhand high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/jharkhand-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/jharkhand-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/jharkhand-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/jharkhand-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":315706,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/01\/facilitation-council-not-have-jurisdiction-dispute-arising-services-not-registered-msmed-act-allahabad-high-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":339655,"position":5},"title":"Facilitation Council does not have jurisdiction to entertain dispute arising out of services not registered under MSMED Act: Allahabad HC","author":"Apoorva","date":"March 1, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court said that the term \u2018condition and the specification of the cold storage\u2019 together with the definition clauses constitute the cold storage services and, therefore, cold storage services have been properly structured under the U.P. Enactment read with modified subordinate legislation of Uttar Pradesh.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Allahabad High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/339655","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=339655"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/339655\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/339658"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=339655"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=339655"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=339655"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}