{"id":339422,"date":"2025-01-20T18:00:46","date_gmt":"2025-01-20T12:30:46","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=339422"},"modified":"2025-01-27T10:55:21","modified_gmt":"2025-01-27T05:25:21","slug":"punjab-and-haryana-hc-denies-relief-judiciary-aspirant-failed-by-6-75-marks","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/20\/punjab-and-haryana-hc-denies-relief-judiciary-aspirant-failed-by-6-75-marks\/","title":{"rendered":"\u2018Limit of 15% marks in viva voce can be exceeded in judiciary exams\u2019; Punjab and Haryana HC denies relief to judiciary aspirant who failed by 6.75 marks"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Punjab and Haryana High Court:<\/span> In a writ petition filed by the petitioner seeking relief regarding his non-appointment as a Civil Judge due to his failing the exam by 6.75 marks, the Division Bench of Sheel Nagu*<\/span>, CJ., and Sudhir Singh, J., dismissed the petition while holding that the petitioner entered the process of recruitment with open eyes and was well aware of the passing marks, thus, the principle of estoppel would operate against him. The Court also held that it was valid to exceed the 15% limit for viva voce as the broader purpose of evaluating a candidate’s suitability for a judicial position required a more nuanced approach.!<\/p>\n

Background<\/h3>\n

The petitioner was a judiciary aspirant who applied for appointment as a Civil Judge (Entry Level) under an advertisement issued by the Haryana Public Service Commission. He was aggrieved that despite scoring 513.50 marks out of 900 marks in the written (main) examination and securing 29.75 marks out of 200 marks in viva voce, he could not pass the exam by a margin of 6.75 marks as he secured 543.25 out of the requisite 550 marks. Thus, he filed the present writ petition.<\/p>\n

Analysis<\/h3>\n

The Court opined that the petitioner entered the process of recruitment with open eyes and was well aware of the passing marks being 50 percent aggregate of the written as well as viva-voce and, therefore, it could not be said that he was taken by surprise or the rules of the game were changed after the game had begun. Thus, the principle of estoppel would operate against an unsuccessful candidate.<\/p>\n

Regarding the expectation of a candidate, the Court stated that undoubtedly every candidate does his best but that alone could not be a good reason to interfere if a candidate failed to secure marks as per their expectations. The Court added that it was only because the petitioner secured 29.75 marks out of 200 marks in the viva voce that he could not attain the passing marks of 50 percent aggregate marks of the written exam and viva voce. Thus, the Court held that the petitioner could not be granted any relief.<\/p>\n

The Court further stated that in matters of recruitment to services, interference in the recruitment process, when otherwise conducted in a transparent, fair, and reasonable manner with no allegation of malafides, could not be done in the limited power of judicial review of this Court under Article 226<\/a> of the Constitution<\/a>.<\/p>\n

The Court said that “Recruitment to judicial service is not akin to recruitment to any civil post under the State or UOI. The unique nature of duties and powers attached to a judicial office compels the recruiting agency to adopt a mode of selection which is understandably distinct. Emphasis upon viva voce to a little more extent than other recruitments, is necessary to ensure, that persons of very high level of integrity, aptitude, character, and merit, adorn the judicial offices. Whether a candidate has an aptitude, inclination, and character to become a judge, cannot alone be determined by written test.”<\/span> Stating this, the Court added that the requirement of a percentage of marks little higher than 15% for viva voce, as stipulated by the Supreme Court in Ajay Hasia<\/span> v. Khalid Mujib Sehravardi<\/span> (1981) 1 SCC 722<\/a><\/span>, in the recruitment of judicial offices was understandable. In this regard, the Court also placed reliance on the case Lila Dhar<\/span> v. State of Rajasthan<\/span> (1981) 4 SCC 159<\/a>.<\/p>\n

In light of the above, the Court held that it was valid to exceed the 15% limit for viva voce as the broader purpose of evaluating candidate’s suitability for a judicial position required a more nuanced approach. Thus, adhering strictly to the 15% cap was not obligatory in such cases.<\/p>\n

Holding the aforesaid, the Court dismissed the writ petition.<\/p>\n

[Bhuvan Goel v. High Court of Punjab and Haryana, 2025 SCC OnLine P&H 246<\/a>, decided on 09-01-2025<\/span>]<\/p>\n

*Judgment authored by Chief Justice Sheel Nagu<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n\n

Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n

For the petitioner:<\/span> Nayandeep Rana<\/p>\n

For the respondents:<\/span> Senior Advocate Sanjeev Sharma, Shubreet Kaur Saron, and Balvinder Sangwan<\/p>\n

Buy Constitution of India  HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n

\"Constitution<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

“In matters of recruitment to services, interference to the process of recruitment when otherwise conducted in a transparent, fair and reasonable manner with no allegation of malafides cannot be gone into in the limited power of judicial review of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution.”<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":314970,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[12141,70941,29517,22034,3528,3516,7741,77717,2670,30138,10271],"class_list":["post-339422","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-article-226","tag-chief-justice-sheel-nagu","tag-judge","tag-judicial-exam","tag-Judicial_Review","tag-judicial_service","tag-judiciary","tag-justice-sudhir-singh","tag-Punjab_and_Haryana_High_Court","tag-recruitment-process","tag-viva-voce"],"yoast_head":"\nPunjab and Haryana HC denies relief to judiciary aspirant who failed by 6.75 marks | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Punjab and Haryana HC denied relief to judiciary aspirant who failed by 6.75 marks, stated that limit of 15% marks in viva voce could be exceeded in judiciary exams.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/20\/punjab-and-haryana-hc-denies-relief-judiciary-aspirant-failed-by-6-75-marks\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"\u2018Limit of 15% marks in viva voce can be exceeded in judiciary exams\u2019; Punjab and Haryana HC denies relief to judiciary aspirant who failed by 6.75 marks\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Punjab and Haryana HC denied relief to judiciary aspirant who failed by 6.75 marks, stated that limit of 15% marks in viva voce could be exceeded in judiciary exams.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/20\/punjab-and-haryana-hc-denies-relief-judiciary-aspirant-failed-by-6-75-marks\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-01-20T12:30:46+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-01-27T05:25:21+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Punjab-and-Haryana-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"591\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"\u2018Limit of 15% marks in viva voce can be exceeded in judiciary exams\u2019; Punjab and Haryana HC denies relief to judiciary aspirant who failed by 6.75 marks\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/20\/punjab-and-haryana-hc-denies-relief-judiciary-aspirant-failed-by-6-75-marks\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/20\/punjab-and-haryana-hc-denies-relief-judiciary-aspirant-failed-by-6-75-marks\/\",\"name\":\"Punjab and Haryana HC denies relief to judiciary aspirant who failed by 6.75 marks | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/20\/punjab-and-haryana-hc-denies-relief-judiciary-aspirant-failed-by-6-75-marks\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/20\/punjab-and-haryana-hc-denies-relief-judiciary-aspirant-failed-by-6-75-marks\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Punjab-and-Haryana-High-Court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-01-20T12:30:46+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-01-27T05:25:21+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"Punjab and Haryana HC denied relief to judiciary aspirant who failed by 6.75 marks, stated that limit of 15% marks in viva voce could be exceeded in judiciary exams.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/20\/punjab-and-haryana-hc-denies-relief-judiciary-aspirant-failed-by-6-75-marks\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/20\/punjab-and-haryana-hc-denies-relief-judiciary-aspirant-failed-by-6-75-marks\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/20\/punjab-and-haryana-hc-denies-relief-judiciary-aspirant-failed-by-6-75-marks\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Punjab-and-Haryana-High-Court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Punjab-and-Haryana-High-Court.webp\",\"width\":887,\"height\":591,\"caption\":\"Punjab and Haryana High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/20\/punjab-and-haryana-hc-denies-relief-judiciary-aspirant-failed-by-6-75-marks\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"\u2018Limit of 15% marks in viva voce can be exceeded in judiciary exams\u2019; Punjab and Haryana HC denies relief to judiciary aspirant who failed by 6.75 marks\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Punjab and Haryana HC denies relief to judiciary aspirant who failed by 6.75 marks | SCC Times","description":"Punjab and Haryana HC denied relief to judiciary aspirant who failed by 6.75 marks, stated that limit of 15% marks in viva voce could be exceeded in judiciary exams.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/20\/punjab-and-haryana-hc-denies-relief-judiciary-aspirant-failed-by-6-75-marks\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"\u2018Limit of 15% marks in viva voce can be exceeded in judiciary exams\u2019; Punjab and Haryana HC denies relief to judiciary aspirant who failed by 6.75 marks","og_description":"Punjab and Haryana HC denied relief to judiciary aspirant who failed by 6.75 marks, stated that limit of 15% marks in viva voce could be exceeded in judiciary exams.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/20\/punjab-and-haryana-hc-denies-relief-judiciary-aspirant-failed-by-6-75-marks\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2025-01-20T12:30:46+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-01-27T05:25:21+00:00","og_image":[{"width":887,"height":591,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Punjab-and-Haryana-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"\u2018Limit of 15% marks in viva voce can be exceeded in judiciary exams\u2019; Punjab and Haryana HC denies relief to judiciary aspirant who failed by 6.75 marks","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/20\/punjab-and-haryana-hc-denies-relief-judiciary-aspirant-failed-by-6-75-marks\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/20\/punjab-and-haryana-hc-denies-relief-judiciary-aspirant-failed-by-6-75-marks\/","name":"Punjab and Haryana HC denies relief to judiciary aspirant who failed by 6.75 marks | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/20\/punjab-and-haryana-hc-denies-relief-judiciary-aspirant-failed-by-6-75-marks\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/20\/punjab-and-haryana-hc-denies-relief-judiciary-aspirant-failed-by-6-75-marks\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Punjab-and-Haryana-High-Court.webp","datePublished":"2025-01-20T12:30:46+00:00","dateModified":"2025-01-27T05:25:21+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"Punjab and Haryana HC denied relief to judiciary aspirant who failed by 6.75 marks, stated that limit of 15% marks in viva voce could be exceeded in judiciary exams.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/20\/punjab-and-haryana-hc-denies-relief-judiciary-aspirant-failed-by-6-75-marks\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/20\/punjab-and-haryana-hc-denies-relief-judiciary-aspirant-failed-by-6-75-marks\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/20\/punjab-and-haryana-hc-denies-relief-judiciary-aspirant-failed-by-6-75-marks\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Punjab-and-Haryana-High-Court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Punjab-and-Haryana-High-Court.webp","width":887,"height":591,"caption":"Punjab and Haryana High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/20\/punjab-and-haryana-hc-denies-relief-judiciary-aspirant-failed-by-6-75-marks\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"\u2018Limit of 15% marks in viva voce can be exceeded in judiciary exams\u2019; Punjab and Haryana HC denies relief to judiciary aspirant who failed by 6.75 marks"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Punjab-and-Haryana-High-Court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":356593,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/14\/ph-hc-disposes-plea-2016-civil-judge-exam-candidate-after-viva-voce-call\/","url_meta":{"origin":339422,"position":0},"title":"Punjab and Haryana HC disposes plea of 2016 Civil Judge exam candidate after Recruitment Committee calls him for viva-voce following dispute over 3 marks","author":"Editor","date":"August 14, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"In the present case, the petitioner had appeared in Civil Judge examination of 2016. In 2019, he had sought modification of marks obtained in the mains examination and eventually to be called for viva-voce.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"P&H HC disposes plea of 2016 Civil Judge exam candidate","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/PH-HC-disposes-plea-of-2016-Civil-Judge-exam-candidate.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/PH-HC-disposes-plea-of-2016-Civil-Judge-exam-candidate.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/PH-HC-disposes-plea-of-2016-Civil-Judge-exam-candidate.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/PH-HC-disposes-plea-of-2016-Civil-Judge-exam-candidate.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":361850,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/27\/minimum-50-marks-in-superior-judicial-service-exam-not-arbitrary-ph-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":339422,"position":1},"title":"Criteria of securing minimum 50% marks in Punjab and Haryana Superior Judicial Service examination not arbitrary: Punjab and Haryana High Court","author":"Editor","date":"September 27, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cIt is open to the High Court to prescribe the criteria including cut off marks and \u2018minimum marks qualification\u2019 as has been envisaged in clause 8.4 of the notifications to assess the merit and suitability of the candidates to perform the sacrosanct duties of Judicial Officer.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"50% marks in Superior Judicial Service Exam","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/50-marks-in-Superior-Judicial-Service-Exam.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/50-marks-in-Superior-Judicial-Service-Exam.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/50-marks-in-Superior-Judicial-Service-Exam.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/50-marks-in-Superior-Judicial-Service-Exam.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":340941,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/10\/punjab-haryana-hc-directs-appointment-civil-judge-candidate-failed-due-to-being-deprived-2-5-marks\/","url_meta":{"origin":339422,"position":2},"title":"P&H HC directs appointment of Civil Judge candidate who failed after being deprived of 2.5 marks despite writing correct answer","author":"Editor","date":"February 10, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The petitioner answered the question correctly but was not awarded marks, even though other candidates were awarded marks for the same answer.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Punjab and Haryana High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Punjab-and-Haryana-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Punjab-and-Haryana-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Punjab-and-Haryana-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Punjab-and-Haryana-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":273687,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/14\/marks-disclosure-before-viva-voce-under-rti-held-not-permitted-punjab-haryana-superior-judicial-services-transparency-bias-recruitment-legal-news-legal-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":339422,"position":3},"title":"Punjab\/Haryana Superior Judicial Services| Can candidates seek disclosure of marks through RTI before viva-voce? SC decides","author":"Editor","date":"September 14, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\"The disclosure of the marks in the main examination before it is finalised and the viva-voce is conducted, would be against the principles of transparency, rather it will invite criticism of bias or favouritism.\"","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-73-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-73-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-73-1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-73-1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-73-1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":350527,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/13\/punjab-and-haryana-hc-ordered-re-evaluation-in-judicial-services-exam\/","url_meta":{"origin":339422,"position":4},"title":"\u2018The Court cannot assume the role of an examiner, doing so would breach judicial propriety\u2019; Punjab & Haryana HC orders re-evaluation in Judicial Services Exam","author":"Editor","date":"June 13, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cIt is one thing for this Court to hold that the original assessment is infirm to such an extent as to warrant reevaluation; it is quite another and indeed impermissible for it to delve into the academic merit of an answer and render its own evaluative opinion thereon.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Punjab and Haryana High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Punjab-and-Haryana-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Punjab-and-Haryana-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Punjab-and-Haryana-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Punjab-and-Haryana-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":325850,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/06\/justice-sheel-nagu-appointed-chief-justice-ph-hc-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":339422,"position":5},"title":"President appoints Justice Sheel Nagu as the new Chief Justice of Punjab and Haryana High Court","author":"Sucheta","date":"July 6, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"In December 2023, the Supreme Court Collegium recommended Justice Sheel Nagu as the next Chief Justice of Punjab and Haryana High Court after the retirement of former Chief Justice, Justice Ravi Shanker Jha.","rel":"","context":"In "Appointments & Transfers"","block_context":{"text":"Appointments & Transfers","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/appointments\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Justice Sheel Nagu","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/01-113-_1_.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/01-113-_1_.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/01-113-_1_.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/01-113-_1_.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/339422","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=339422"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/339422\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/314970"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=339422"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=339422"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=339422"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}