{"id":339095,"date":"2025-01-15T16:00:39","date_gmt":"2025-01-15T10:30:39","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=339095"},"modified":"2025-01-21T16:54:07","modified_gmt":"2025-01-21T11:24:07","slug":"s143-railways-act-criminalise-multiple-user-id-irctc-sc-legal-news","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/15\/s143-railways-act-criminalise-multiple-user-id-irctc-sc-legal-news\/","title":{"rendered":"Section 143 of Railways Act doesn&#8217;t criminalise creating multiple user IDs and unauthorised actions of the authorised agents: SC"},"content":{"rendered":"<style>\n.animate-charcter{background-image: linear-gradient(-225deg, #231557 0%, #44107a 29%, #ff1361 67%, #fff800 100%); background-size: 200% auto; -webkit-background-clip: text; -webkit-text-fill-color: transparent; animation: textclip 0s linear infinite;}\n@keyframes textclip {to {background-position: 200% center;}}\n<\/style>\n<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Supreme Court:<\/span> While considering the instant appeals revolving around the common issue of interpretation of Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001543255\" target=\"_blank\">143<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002776234\" target=\"_blank\">Railways Act, 1989<\/a>; the Division Bench of <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Dipankar Datta*<\/span> and Prashant Kumar Mishra, JJ., explained that, Section 143, on its plain language, prohibits any person, other than a railway servant or an authorised agent, to conduct the business of procurement and supply of railway tickets. The provision does not specify the modalities of the procurement and supply. Hence, if the Section is read and its contents are given the natural and ordinary meaning, keeping in mind the objective and purpose of the legislation, it admits of no doubt that this provision criminalises unauthorised procurement and supply, irrespective of the mode of procurement and supply.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court opined that merely because the system of e-reservation and e-tickets was introduced after the enactment of the 1989 Act does not render Section 143 toothless to combat the illegal sale of e-tickets. Section 143, importantly, makes no distinction between physical and online sale of tickets. The mischief that the provision seeks to remedy is that there should not be illegal and unauthorised procurement and sale of tickets, whatever be the mode &#8212; physical or online. The Court further stated that <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Section 143 does not criminalise creating multiple user IDs<\/span>. Section 143, by being completely silent on creation of multiple user IDs, penalises the actions of only the unauthorised agents and not unauthorised actions of the authorised agents.<\/p>\n<h3>Background:<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In the first set of appeal, the order of Kerala High Court quashed criminal proceedings against Respondent M under Section 143. Respondent M was accused of carrying out unauthorised business of procuring and supplying railway e-tickets.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In the second appeal, Respondent R challenged the decision of Madras High Court refusing to quash proceedings under Section 143. Respondent R and his sons were the owners of &#8220;Big Top Travels&#8221; which was an authorised agent for railway e-tickets. The offence alleged against him was that he has been supplying e-tickets to various customers, and that these e-tickets had been booked through multiple user IDs.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Counsels for the prosecution submitted that Section 143 of the Act does not permit authorised agents to carry out unauthorised actions under the fa&ccedil;ade of authorisation. When an authorised agent carries out unauthorised transactions using the personal IDs of other individuals, the cloak of authorisation cannot be used as a ruse. Therefore, to be exempt from the application of Section 143, both the status of the person and the nature of the action must be considered.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Per contra<\/span>, submissions for the respondents stated that the plain and unambiguous words of Section 143 of the Act make it clear that the creation of multiple user IDs is not an offence under Section 143, and Section 143 must be construed strictly as it is a penal provision.<\/p>\n<h3>Court&#8217;s Assessment:<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Perusing the impugned orders, the Court observed that Kerala High Court read down Section 143 to state that one can conduct a business of procuring and supplying tickets without the authorisation of the railways as long as it is done through the internet. The impugned order also observed that as the tickets were procured in the name of genuine passengers, it cannot be said that Respondent M had contravened Section 143.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Meanwhile, Madras High Court acknowledged that Respondent R was an authorised agent under Section 143; however, it refused to quash the criminal proceedings on the ground that such authorisation did not empower the appellant to create multiple user IDs for the purpose of procuring tickets for illegal gain.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Considering whether the act of creating fake\/multiple user IDs by an individual, who may or may not be an authorized railway agent, with the intention to procure and supply online tickets through IRCTC portal would constitute an offence under Section 143 of the Act; the Court noted that the purport and objective of Section 143 of the Act is to restrict entities which are not under the disciplinary control of or are not authorised by the railways to conduct the business of procurement and supply of railway tickets. <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Railway servants and authorised agents stand apart since, on its own terms, Section 143 has no application to them<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court stated that scheme of e-ticketing was introduced for the convenience and betterment of the passenger&#8217;s experience of travelling on a train, due to which the procurement and supply of these e-tickets is highly regulated. The Court explained that IRCTC has limited the number of tickets which can be reserved on one personal user ID at 12 per month (24 per month with a user ID which is Aadhaar verified). It was alleged that Respondent M had created hundreds of fake user IDs to sell tickets without any authorisation from the railways. Although the internet and e-tickets were unknown in India when the Act was brought into force, this conduct of M (who was neither a railway servant nor an authorised agent) nevertheless attracts criminality under Section 143(1)(a) of the Act.<\/p>\n<p class=\"animate-charcter\" style=\"margin-left: 36pt; margin-bottom: 3%;\">&#8220;<span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Statutory interpretation has to follow certain principles which have been formulated through legal precedents. No court can refuse to enforce a provision on the sole basis of the provision predating any subsequent development regarding the ticketing process. If it can be demonstrated that a statutory provision is broad enough to envelop the subsequent developments, even if the developments were not envisioned by the legislature, the provision would stay operational<\/span>&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court reiterated that if the language of the particular statute under consideration is clear and unambiguous, it is not for the courts to add to or delete any words from the statute in the guise of ascertaining what could have been the legislative intent. &#8220;<span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Having regard to the comprehensive phraseology employed in Section 143, the net of its coverage is wide enough to encompass regulation of the conduct of ticketing agents and to protect the public from unscrupulous elements trying to defraud them by sale of valueless tickets<\/span>&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court explained that Kerala High Court allowed the quashing petition filed by Mathew on the ground that the 1989 Act was enacted before the advent of internet and e-tickets and the lawmakers could not have envisioned sale of tickets, online. The Court found this line of reasoning of the High Court to be erroneous.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court further explained that travel agents, by and large, do not purchase tickets in their own name and then sell it to the passengers. Tickets are procured in the name of the passengers by these agents in lieu of a commission on the price thereof. Taking active steps, however faithfully, in order to acquire and provide tickets to third parties but without being a railway servant or an authorised agent would attract the expression &#8216;<span style=\"font-style: italic;\">procure and supply<\/span>&#8217; as in Section 143.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Therefore, the Court agreed with the prosecution that Section 143, a penal provision, has been enacted to tackle a social crime.<\/p>\n<p class=\"animate-charcter\" style=\"margin-left: 36pt; margin-bottom: 3%; font-weight: bold;\">&#8220;<span style=\"font-style: italic;\">The Indian Railways is a keystone of our country&#8217;s infrastructure. It carries around 673 crore passengers annually and has a tremendous impact on the economy of this country. Any effort to disrupt the integrity and stability of the ticketing system has to be stopped on its tracks<\/span>&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">With the afore-stated analysis, the Court stated that Penal provisions have to be read strictly and narrowly as a general rule. Thus, even if the facts disclosed in the first information report are taken at face value, commission of an offence cannot be attributed to Respondent R. Any breach has to be remedied by civil action and not criminal action.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Respondent M being an unauthorised agent must face proceedings against him; hence the Court restored the proceedings against M. Since Respondent R was an authorised agent, cannot be proceeded against under Section 143 of the 1989 Act for alleged breach of any of the terms and conditions of the contract. If, at all, he would be liable to face civil action.<\/p>\n<p><!--\n\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Inspector (RPF) v. Mathew K. Cherian, CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 4169\/2024, decided on 9-1-2025<\/span>]<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000080;\">*Judgment by Justice Dipankar Datta<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n<hr\/>\n\n\n\n\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Appellant:<\/span> Mr. Namit Saxena, AOR Mr. Amrish Kumar, AOR<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Respondents:<\/span> Mr. A. Raghunath, AOR Mr. Amrish Kumar, AOR Mr. Alim Anvar, Adv. Mr. Nishe Rajen Shonker, AOR Mrs. Anu K Joy, Adv. Mr. Santhosh K, Adv.<\/p>\n\n--><\/p>\n<div style=\"text-overflow: ellipsis; background-color: #92A8D1; text-align:justify; clear:both; text-size-adjust: auto; overflow: auto;\">\n<p style=\"font-size: 18pt; margin-top: 5px; text-align: center;\">CASE DETAILS<\/p>\n<table width=\"100%\" style=\"word-wrap: break-word; border-collapse:collapse; table-layout: fixed; margin-top: 10px;\">\n<colgroup>\n<col width=\"41%\"\/>\n<col width=\"59%\"\/>\n<\/colgroup>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td valign=\"top\">\n<p><span style=\"color: #D4E4F7; font-weight: bold;\">Citation:<\/span><br \/> <span style=\"color: #D4E4F7; font-size: 10pt;\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/DgY3H2vt\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2025 SCC OnLine SC 51<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #D4E4F7; font-weight: bold;\">Appellants&#160;:<\/span><br \/> Inspector (RPF)<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #D4E4F7; font-weight: bold;\">Respondents&#160;:<\/span><br \/> Mathew K. Cherian<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td valign=\"top\">\n<p style=\"color: #D4E4F7; font-weight: bold;\">Advocates who appeared in this case<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #D4E4F7; font-weight: bold;\">For Petitioner(s):<\/span><br \/> Mr. Namit Saxena, AOR Mr. Amrish Kumar, AOR<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #D4E4F7; font-weight: bold;\">For Respondent(s):<\/span><br \/> Mr. A. Raghunath, AOR Mr. Amrish Kumar, AOR Mr. Alim Anvar, Adv. Mr. Nishe Rajen Shonker, AOR Mrs. Anu K Joy, Adv. Mr. Santhosh K, Adv.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p style=\"font-size: 12pt; margin-top: -20px; margin-left: 5px;\"><span style=\"color: #D4E4F7; font-weight: bold;\">CORAM&#160;:<\/span><\/p>\n<div id=\"banner\" style=\"overflow: hidden; display: flex; justify-content: space-between; padding-left: 3%;\">\n<div class=\"\" style=\"max-width: 100%; max-height: 100%; font-size: 9pt; text-align: center;\">\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/09\/know-thy-judge-supreme-court-of-india-justice-dipankar-datta\/\" target=\"_blank\"><img decoding=\"async\" height=\"100px\" width=\"100px\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scobserver.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/Dipankar-datta-modified.jpg\" alt=\"Dipankar Datta, J.\" style=\"border-radius: 50%; border:2px solid #FF5733; padding: 1px;\"><br \/><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Dipankar Datta, J.<\/span><\/img><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"\" style=\"max-width: 100%; max-height: 100%; font-size: 9pt; text-align: center;\">\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" height=\"100px\" width=\"100px\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scobserver.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/PK-Mishra-modified.png\" alt=\"Prashant Kumar Mishra, J.\" style=\"border-radius: 50%;\"><br \/><span style=\"color: black !important;\">Prashant Kumar Mishra, J.<\/span><\/img><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"\" style=\"max-width: 100%; max-height: 100%;\"><\/div>\n<div class=\"\" style=\"max-width: 100%; max-height: 100%;\"><\/div>\n<div class=\"\" style=\"max-width: 100%; max-height: 100%;\"><\/div>\n<div class=\"\" style=\"max-width: 100%; max-height: 100%;\"><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">The Court said that Section 143 of the Railways Act, 1989 by being completely silent on creation of multiple user IDs, penalises the actions of only the unauthorised agents.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":339104,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,9],"tags":[41271,77557,3689,77556,40866,77555,5363],"class_list":["post-339095","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-supremecourt","tag-e-tickets","tag-fake-user-id","tag-IRCTC","tag-irctc-user-id","tag-justice-dipankar-datta","tag-railway-ticket-reservation","tag-supreme-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>S. 143 Railways Act doesn&#039;t criminalise creating multiple user IDs: SC<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Supreme Court said that Section 143 of the Railways Act, 1989 by being completely silent on creation of multiple user IDs, penalises the actions of only the unauthorised agents.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/15\/s143-railways-act-criminalise-multiple-user-id-irctc-sc-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Section 143 of Railways Act doesn&#039;t criminalise creating multiple user IDs and unauthorised actions of the authorised agents: SC\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Supreme Court said that Section 143 of the Railways Act, 1989 by being completely silent on creation of multiple user IDs, penalises the actions of only the unauthorised agents.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/15\/s143-railways-act-criminalise-multiple-user-id-irctc-sc-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-01-15T10:30:39+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-01-21T11:24:07+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/S.-143-Railways-Act-multiple-User-ID.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Section 143 of Railways Act doesn&#039;t criminalise creating multiple user IDs and unauthorised actions of the authorised agents: SC\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/15\/s143-railways-act-criminalise-multiple-user-id-irctc-sc-legal-news\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/15\/s143-railways-act-criminalise-multiple-user-id-irctc-sc-legal-news\/\",\"name\":\"S. 143 Railways Act doesn't criminalise creating multiple user IDs: SC\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/15\/s143-railways-act-criminalise-multiple-user-id-irctc-sc-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/15\/s143-railways-act-criminalise-multiple-user-id-irctc-sc-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/S.-143-Railways-Act-multiple-User-ID.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-01-15T10:30:39+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-01-21T11:24:07+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\"},\"description\":\"Supreme Court said that Section 143 of the Railways Act, 1989 by being completely silent on creation of multiple user IDs, penalises the actions of only the unauthorised agents.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/15\/s143-railways-act-criminalise-multiple-user-id-irctc-sc-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/15\/s143-railways-act-criminalise-multiple-user-id-irctc-sc-legal-news\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/15\/s143-railways-act-criminalise-multiple-user-id-irctc-sc-legal-news\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/S.-143-Railways-Act-multiple-User-ID.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/S.-143-Railways-Act-multiple-User-ID.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"S. 143 Railways Act multiple User ID\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/15\/s143-railways-act-criminalise-multiple-user-id-irctc-sc-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Section 143 of Railways Act doesn&#8217;t criminalise creating multiple user IDs and unauthorised actions of the authorised agents: SC\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\",\"name\":\"Sucheta\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Sucheta\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"S. 143 Railways Act doesn't criminalise creating multiple user IDs: SC","description":"Supreme Court said that Section 143 of the Railways Act, 1989 by being completely silent on creation of multiple user IDs, penalises the actions of only the unauthorised agents.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/15\/s143-railways-act-criminalise-multiple-user-id-irctc-sc-legal-news\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Section 143 of Railways Act doesn't criminalise creating multiple user IDs and unauthorised actions of the authorised agents: SC","og_description":"Supreme Court said that Section 143 of the Railways Act, 1989 by being completely silent on creation of multiple user IDs, penalises the actions of only the unauthorised agents.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/15\/s143-railways-act-criminalise-multiple-user-id-irctc-sc-legal-news\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2025-01-15T10:30:39+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-01-21T11:24:07+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/S.-143-Railways-Act-multiple-User-ID.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Sucheta","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Section 143 of Railways Act doesn't criminalise creating multiple user IDs and unauthorised actions of the authorised agents: SC","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Sucheta","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/15\/s143-railways-act-criminalise-multiple-user-id-irctc-sc-legal-news\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/15\/s143-railways-act-criminalise-multiple-user-id-irctc-sc-legal-news\/","name":"S. 143 Railways Act doesn't criminalise creating multiple user IDs: SC","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/15\/s143-railways-act-criminalise-multiple-user-id-irctc-sc-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/15\/s143-railways-act-criminalise-multiple-user-id-irctc-sc-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/S.-143-Railways-Act-multiple-User-ID.webp","datePublished":"2025-01-15T10:30:39+00:00","dateModified":"2025-01-21T11:24:07+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa"},"description":"Supreme Court said that Section 143 of the Railways Act, 1989 by being completely silent on creation of multiple user IDs, penalises the actions of only the unauthorised agents.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/15\/s143-railways-act-criminalise-multiple-user-id-irctc-sc-legal-news\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/15\/s143-railways-act-criminalise-multiple-user-id-irctc-sc-legal-news\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/15\/s143-railways-act-criminalise-multiple-user-id-irctc-sc-legal-news\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/S.-143-Railways-Act-multiple-User-ID.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/S.-143-Railways-Act-multiple-User-ID.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"S. 143 Railways Act multiple User ID"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/15\/s143-railways-act-criminalise-multiple-user-id-irctc-sc-legal-news\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Section 143 of Railways Act doesn&#8217;t criminalise creating multiple user IDs and unauthorised actions of the authorised agents: SC"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa","name":"Sucheta","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Sucheta"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/S.-143-Railways-Act-multiple-User-ID.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":279539,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/13\/know-thy-newly-appointed-supreme-court-judge-justice-dipankar-datta\/","url_meta":{"origin":339095,"position":0},"title":"Know Thy Newly Appointed Supreme Court Judge- Justice Dipankar Datta","author":"Editor","date":"December 13, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Former Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court, Justice Dipankar Datta, was sworn in as a Supreme Court Judge. His appointment now raises the judicial strength of the Supreme Court to 28 out of total strength of 34 judges","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Know thy Judge&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Know thy Judge","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/judges-information\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Justice Dipankar Datta","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-460.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":283494,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/09\/know-thy-judge-justice-dipankar-datta-legal-research-legal-news-updates-calcutta-high-court-supreme-court-judiciary-judges\/","url_meta":{"origin":339095,"position":1},"title":"Know Thy Judge| Justice Dipankar Datta","author":"Editor","date":"February 9, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Justice Dipankar Datta, was born on 09-02-1965 in a Bengali family. He served as a Judge in the Calcutta High Court, and as a Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court, then he was sworn in as Supreme Court Judge by Chief Justice Dr D.Y. Chandrachud on 12-12-2022","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Know thy Judge&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Know thy Judge","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/judges-information\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-342.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":6750,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/08\/17\/indian-railways-and-irctc-are-not-guilty-of-abuse-of-dominance-but-service-charges-on-e-ticking-ought-to-be-done-away\/","url_meta":{"origin":339095,"position":2},"title":"Indian Railways and IRCTC are not guilty of abuse of dominance but service charges on e-ticketing ought to be done away","author":"Sucheta","date":"August 17, 2015","format":false,"excerpt":"Competition Commission of India: In its majority order, the competition watchdog ruled that allegations of abuse of dominant position in the relevant market of \u201ctransportation of passengers through railways across India including the ancillary segments like ticketing, catering on board, platform facilities etc. provided by Indian Railways\u201d are misconceived and\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Tribunals\/Commissions\/Regulatory Bodies&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Tribunals\/Commissions\/Regulatory Bodies","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/tribunals_commissions_regulatorybodies\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":279424,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/12\/president-appoints-justice-dipankar-datta-as-the-judge-of-supreme-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":339095,"position":3},"title":"President appoints Justice Dipankar Datta as the Judge of Supreme Court","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 12, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 The President has appointed Shri Justice Dipankar Datta, Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court, to be a Judge of the Supreme Court of India with effect from the date he assumes charge of his office.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Appointments &amp; Transfers&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Appointments &amp; Transfers","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/appointments\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"supreme court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-444.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":274603,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/28\/sc-collegium-recommends-bombay-hc-chief-justice-dipankar-datta-for-elevation-as-supreme-court-judge\/","url_meta":{"origin":339095,"position":4},"title":"SC Collegium recommends Bombay HC Chief Justice Dipankar Datta for elevation as Supreme Court judge","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 28, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"On 26-09-2022, the Supreme Court in the collegium meeting has recommended elevation of Mr Justice Dipankar Datta, Chief Justice of Bombay High Court as Judge of Supreme Court.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Appointments &amp; Transfers&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Appointments &amp; Transfers","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/appointments\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Supreme-Court-1.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Supreme-Court-1.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Supreme-Court-1.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Supreme-Court-1.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Supreme-Court-1.png?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":228495,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/04\/20\/sc-collegium-recommends-elevation-of-justice-dipankar-datta-of-calcutta-hc-as-chief-justice-of-bombay-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":339095,"position":5},"title":"SC Collegium recommends &#8212; Elevation of Justice Dipankar Datta of Calcutta HC as Chief Justice of Bombay HC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"April 20, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Collegium Statement Supreme Court Collegium on 18th April, 2020 has recommended elevation of Mr Justice Dipankar Datta, Judge, Calcutta High Court as Chief Justice of Bombay High Court. Justice Dipankar Datta Born on February 9, 1965. Son of late Salil Kumar Datta, a former Judge of the High Court at\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Appointments &amp; Transfers&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Appointments &amp; Transfers","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/appointments\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/339095","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=339095"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/339095\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/339104"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=339095"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=339095"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=339095"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}