{"id":338920,"date":"2025-01-13T17:30:26","date_gmt":"2025-01-13T12:00:26","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=338920"},"modified":"2025-01-18T10:45:18","modified_gmt":"2025-01-18T05:15:18","slug":"chhattisgarh-hc-quashes-stigmatic-order-gram-rojgar-sahayak-procedural-irregularities","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/13\/chhattisgarh-hc-quashes-stigmatic-order-gram-rojgar-sahayak-procedural-irregularities\/","title":{"rendered":"\u2018No proper inquiry, opportunity of hearing\u2019; Chhattisgarh HC quashes stigmatic order terminating Gram Rojgar Sahayak from his service"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Chhattisgarh High Court:<\/span> In a writ petition filed against the order passed by respondent 5 – Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Dongargaon, whereby the services of the petitioner as Gram Rojgar Sahayak (‘GRS’), Gram Panchayat Maretha Navagaon, were terminated, the Single Judge Bench of Amitendra Kishore Prasad, J., allowed the petition holding that the impugned order was passed in a very harsh manner without granting opportunity of hearing to the petitioner.<\/p>\n

Background<\/h3>\n

In 2016, the petitioner was appointed as the GRS on a contractual basis under the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (‘MGNREGA’). The appointment was initially for one year. Later, considering his capability and work, the respondent authorities extended his service period.<\/p>\n

In 2022, Daleshwar Sahu, a Member of Legislative Assembly (‘MLA’), complained against the petitioner before respondent No. 4-Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat, stating that the petitioner was not of good character and the other Panch and Sarpanchs had complained against him. The MLA also alleged that the petitioner did not work properly. Thus, an Investigation Committee was constituted to look into these allegations.<\/p>\n

Subsequently, on 03-02-2023, respondent 4 issued a show-cause notice to the petitioner alleging, inter alia, that he failed to increase the number of labourers in the Gram Panchayat by accepting wage-based employment despite orders from his superiors.<\/p>\n

On the same day, respondent 4 issued another letter informing the petitioner that a report was obtained regarding the MLA’s complaint, and the Investigation Committee had recommended his removal or transfer. Furthermore, he was called before the District Level Committee for a hearing. The petitioner contended that he was never informed about the constitution of any Investigation Committee, and no report of the said investigation was shown or provided to him, even after his request.<\/p>\n

Again, a show-cause notice was issued by respondent 4 alleging that the petitioner had failed to achieve the targets and had underperformed.<\/p>\n

Thereafter, citing administrative reasons, the petitioner was transferred to Gram Panchayat Dhaurabhata. The next month, vide the impugned order, respondent 5 terminated the petitioner without any inquiry into the alleged misconduct. Hence, this writ petition was filed.<\/p>\n

Analysis and Decision<\/h3>\n

Upon perusal of the impugned stigmatic order, the Court noted that there were several allegations levelled against the petitioner claiming that he was reluctant to perform his duty and disobeyed the instructions of the respondent authorities as he failed to give 100 days’ employment to labourers. There were also allegations made by the Sarpanch as well as a criminal case registered against him.<\/p>\n

The Court noted that due to the several allegations levelled against the petitioner, an inquiry was conducted, but nothing was found against him in the inquiry report, and the charges were not proved. Despite that, the petitioner was removed from service without conducting any inquiry, much less giving any proper opportunity of a hearing.<\/p>\n

The Court placed reliance on Swati Priyadarshini<\/span> v. State of M.P.<\/span> 2024 SCC OnLine SC 2139<\/a>, wherein the Supreme Court held that even for a contractual appointment if any stigmatic order is to be passed, it has to be passed after conducting a proper inquiry and after giving due opportunity of hearing to the delinquent\/employee concerned. The Court also placed reliance on Digambar Chandrakar v. State of Chhattisgarh<\/span>1<\/sup><\/a>, which was passed in line with Priyadarshini (supra).<\/span><\/p>\n

Considering the aforesaid, the Court held that the impugned order was passed in a very harsh manner without granting the opportunity of a hearing to the petitioner. The Court reiterated that if any stigmatic order was to be passed, the foremost thing was to give a notice levelling specific allegation and holding an inquiry after giving due opportunity of hearing to the employee\/delinquent. Thereafter, an order could be passed after conducting such an inquiry. The Court held that this procedure was not followed in the present case.<\/p>\n

Thus, the Court quashed the impugned order and allowed the petition while granting liberty to hold a proper inquiry to the State.<\/p>\n

[Yaad Das Sahu v. State of Chhattisgarh, 2025 SCC OnLine Chh 595<\/a>, decided on 03-01-2025<\/span>]<\/p>\n\n

Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n

For the petitioner:<\/span> K.N. Nande<\/p>\n

For the respondent:<\/span> Panel Lawyer Prateek Tiwari and Akhilesh Kumar<\/p>\n<\/div>\n\n

1.<\/a> WPS No. 4969\/2015<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The Court reiterated that before passing any stigmatic order for removal of any employee from service, a departmental enquiry was required to be conducted.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":315373,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[21444,30591,77478,77479,77480,37723,30604,77477,57420],"class_list":["post-338920","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-audi-alteram-partem","tag-chhattisgarh-high-court","tag-daleshwar-sahu","tag-delinquit-employee","tag-gram-rojgar-sahayak","tag-illegal-termination","tag-mgnrega","tag-procedural-irregularities","tag-stigmatic-order"],"yoast_head":"\nChhattisgarh HC quashes stigmatic order against Gram Rojgar Sahayak, cites procedural irregularities | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Chhattisgarh High Court quashed stigmatic order passed against a Gram Rojgar Sahayak, cited no proper inquiry and opportunity of hearing\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/13\/chhattisgarh-hc-quashes-stigmatic-order-gram-rojgar-sahayak-procedural-irregularities\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"\u2018No proper inquiry, opportunity of hearing\u2019; Chhattisgarh HC quashes stigmatic order terminating Gram Rojgar Sahayak from his service\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Chhattisgarh High Court quashed stigmatic order passed against a Gram Rojgar Sahayak, cited no proper inquiry and opportunity of hearing\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/13\/chhattisgarh-hc-quashes-stigmatic-order-gram-rojgar-sahayak-procedural-irregularities\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-01-13T12:00:26+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-01-18T05:15:18+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Chhattisgarh-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"591\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"\u2018No proper inquiry, opportunity of hearing\u2019; Chhattisgarh HC quashes stigmatic order terminating Gram Rojgar Sahayak from his service\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/13\/chhattisgarh-hc-quashes-stigmatic-order-gram-rojgar-sahayak-procedural-irregularities\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/13\/chhattisgarh-hc-quashes-stigmatic-order-gram-rojgar-sahayak-procedural-irregularities\/\",\"name\":\"Chhattisgarh HC quashes stigmatic order against Gram Rojgar Sahayak, cites procedural irregularities | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/13\/chhattisgarh-hc-quashes-stigmatic-order-gram-rojgar-sahayak-procedural-irregularities\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/13\/chhattisgarh-hc-quashes-stigmatic-order-gram-rojgar-sahayak-procedural-irregularities\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Chhattisgarh-High-Court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-01-13T12:00:26+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-01-18T05:15:18+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"Chhattisgarh High Court quashed stigmatic order passed against a Gram Rojgar Sahayak, cited no proper inquiry and opportunity of hearing\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/13\/chhattisgarh-hc-quashes-stigmatic-order-gram-rojgar-sahayak-procedural-irregularities\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/13\/chhattisgarh-hc-quashes-stigmatic-order-gram-rojgar-sahayak-procedural-irregularities\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/13\/chhattisgarh-hc-quashes-stigmatic-order-gram-rojgar-sahayak-procedural-irregularities\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Chhattisgarh-High-Court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Chhattisgarh-High-Court.webp\",\"width\":887,\"height\":591,\"caption\":\"Chhattisgarh High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/13\/chhattisgarh-hc-quashes-stigmatic-order-gram-rojgar-sahayak-procedural-irregularities\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"\u2018No proper inquiry, opportunity of hearing\u2019; Chhattisgarh HC quashes stigmatic order terminating Gram Rojgar Sahayak from his service\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Chhattisgarh HC quashes stigmatic order against Gram Rojgar Sahayak, cites procedural irregularities | SCC Times","description":"Chhattisgarh High Court quashed stigmatic order passed against a Gram Rojgar Sahayak, cited no proper inquiry and opportunity of hearing","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/13\/chhattisgarh-hc-quashes-stigmatic-order-gram-rojgar-sahayak-procedural-irregularities\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"\u2018No proper inquiry, opportunity of hearing\u2019; Chhattisgarh HC quashes stigmatic order terminating Gram Rojgar Sahayak from his service","og_description":"Chhattisgarh High Court quashed stigmatic order passed against a Gram Rojgar Sahayak, cited no proper inquiry and opportunity of hearing","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/13\/chhattisgarh-hc-quashes-stigmatic-order-gram-rojgar-sahayak-procedural-irregularities\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2025-01-13T12:00:26+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-01-18T05:15:18+00:00","og_image":[{"width":887,"height":591,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Chhattisgarh-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"\u2018No proper inquiry, opportunity of hearing\u2019; Chhattisgarh HC quashes stigmatic order terminating Gram Rojgar Sahayak from his service","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/13\/chhattisgarh-hc-quashes-stigmatic-order-gram-rojgar-sahayak-procedural-irregularities\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/13\/chhattisgarh-hc-quashes-stigmatic-order-gram-rojgar-sahayak-procedural-irregularities\/","name":"Chhattisgarh HC quashes stigmatic order against Gram Rojgar Sahayak, cites procedural irregularities | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/13\/chhattisgarh-hc-quashes-stigmatic-order-gram-rojgar-sahayak-procedural-irregularities\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/13\/chhattisgarh-hc-quashes-stigmatic-order-gram-rojgar-sahayak-procedural-irregularities\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Chhattisgarh-High-Court.webp","datePublished":"2025-01-13T12:00:26+00:00","dateModified":"2025-01-18T05:15:18+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"Chhattisgarh High Court quashed stigmatic order passed against a Gram Rojgar Sahayak, cited no proper inquiry and opportunity of hearing","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/13\/chhattisgarh-hc-quashes-stigmatic-order-gram-rojgar-sahayak-procedural-irregularities\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/13\/chhattisgarh-hc-quashes-stigmatic-order-gram-rojgar-sahayak-procedural-irregularities\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/13\/chhattisgarh-hc-quashes-stigmatic-order-gram-rojgar-sahayak-procedural-irregularities\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Chhattisgarh-High-Court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Chhattisgarh-High-Court.webp","width":887,"height":591,"caption":"Chhattisgarh High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/13\/chhattisgarh-hc-quashes-stigmatic-order-gram-rojgar-sahayak-procedural-irregularities\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"\u2018No proper inquiry, opportunity of hearing\u2019; Chhattisgarh HC quashes stigmatic order terminating Gram Rojgar Sahayak from his service"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Chhattisgarh-High-Court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":208272,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/17\/pat-hc-execution-of-new-agreement-by-employee-whose-termination-of-service-set-aside-benefits-available-to-him-under-previous-agreement-not-obliterated\/","url_meta":{"origin":338920,"position":0},"title":"Pat HC| Execution of new agreement by employee whose termination of service set aside, benefits available to him under previous agreement not obliterated","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 17, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Patna High Court: A Single Judge Bench of Madhuresh Prasad, J. allowed a civil writ petition filed by an employee seeking direction that execution of the new agreement by him would not deprive him of benefits available to him by way of the agreement executed earlier. Petitioner, a Panchayat Rojgar\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":205638,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/24\/section-110-of-the-panchayat-raj-act-2006-does-not-vest-gram-kutchery-with-jurisdiction-to-decide-complicated-issues-of-law-and-title-patna-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":338920,"position":1},"title":"Section 110 of the Panchayat Raj Act, 2006 does not vest Gram Kutchery with jurisdiction to decide complicated issues of law and title: Patna HC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 24, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Patna High Court: A Division bench comprising of Dr Ravi Ranjan and Madhuresh Prasad, JJ. while hearing a civil writ petition quashed the order of Gram Kutchery holding the same to be outside the scope of its jurisdiction. Facts of the case were that the respondent filed an application before\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":200806,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/29\/constitution-of-proposed-gram-panchayat-quashed-on-failure-of-presence-of-quoram-as-required-under-punjab-panchayat-raj-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":338920,"position":2},"title":"Constitution of proposed Gram Panchayat quashed on failure of presence of quorum as required under Punjab Panchayat Raj Act","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 29, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Punjab and Haryana High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Shekhar Dhawan, J., addressed a writ petition in nature of certiorari for quashing of a notification for creation of new Panchayats. Facts of the case are that the Punjab Government issued a letter seeking application for forming of new\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":254505,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/09\/21\/law-of-precedence\/","url_meta":{"origin":338920,"position":3},"title":"Raj HC | According to Law of Precedence, judgment passed by Coordinate Bench binding, whereas judgment of other High Court has persuasive value; transfer order once executed cannot be cancelled, altered or modified","author":"Editor","date":"September 21, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Rajasthan High Court: Dinesh Mehta, J., allowed a petition which was filed challenging the order whereby petitioner\u2019s transfer order dated 28-07-2021 had been amended and she had been posted at Gram Panchayat 12 LNP. Petitioner was working as Gram Vikas Adhikari and vide order dated 28-07-2021, she was posted at\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":221493,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/26\/mp-hc-no-final-order-can-be-passed-without-conducting-enquiry-under-s-89-of-m-p-panchayat-raj-awam-gram-swaraj-adhiniyam\/","url_meta":{"origin":338920,"position":4},"title":"MP HC | No final order can be passed without conducting enquiry under S. 89 of M.P. Panchayat Raj Awam Gram Swaraj Adhiniyam","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 26, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Madhya Pradesh High Court: G. S. Ahluwalia, J., allowed a petition and directed the respondents to not take any coercive step against the petitioner unless and until an enquiry is conducted under Section 89 of\u00a0M.P. Panchayat Raj Awam Gram Swaraj, Adhiniyam, 1993. \u00a0The petitioner has filed the instant petition under\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":208711,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/24\/kar-hc-karnataka-gram-swaraj-and-panchayat-raj-act-1993-no-confidence-motion-moved-against-adhyaksha-within-first-30-months-of-election-is-invalid\/","url_meta":{"origin":338920,"position":5},"title":"Kar HC | Karnataka Gram Swaraj and Panchayat Raj Act, 1993: No-confidence motion moved against Adhyaksha within first 30 months of election is invalid","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 24, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Karnataka High Court: The Bench comprising of S. Sunil Dutt Yadav, J. hearing a petition challenging motion of no-confidence moved against President of Hallare Gram Panchayat, held the same to be invalid for not being in accordance with law. Petitioner, the President of Hallare Gram Panchayat, was issued a notice\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/338920","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=338920"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/338920\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/315373"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=338920"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=338920"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=338920"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}