{"id":338904,"date":"2025-01-13T15:30:16","date_gmt":"2025-01-13T10:00:16","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=338904"},"modified":"2025-01-18T10:52:18","modified_gmt":"2025-01-18T05:22:18","slug":"wife-filing-false-case-under-s498a-ipc-to-correct-husbands-behaviour-amounts-to-cruelty-bomhc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/13\/wife-filing-false-case-under-s498a-ipc-to-correct-husbands-behaviour-amounts-to-cruelty-bomhc\/","title":{"rendered":"Wife filing false case under S.498-A IPC to correct husband\u2019s behaviour amounts to cruelty: Bombay HC"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Bombay High Court:<\/span> The present appeal was filed by appellant-wife against the judgment and decree dated 05-03-2018 passed by the Judge, Family Court, Thane whereby the decree of divorce filed by respondent-husband on the ground of cruelty was allowed. The Division Bench of <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">G.S. Kulkarni*<\/span> and Advait M. Sethna, JJ., opined that the action of resorting to false prosecution, on the wife&#8217;s part, was a sufficient ground to entitle the husband for a divorce on the ground of cruelty under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001543733\" target=\"_blank\">13(1)(i-a)<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726956\" target=\"_blank\">Hindu Marriage Act, 1955<\/a> (&#8216;the 1955 Act&#8217;). The Court rejected the appeal as it did not find any perversity in the observations by the Judge of the Family Court in passing the impugned judgment and order.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The husband had filed a divorce on the ground of cruelty against wife stating that the wife had lodged a false prosecution against him, under the provisions of Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561850\" target=\"_blank\">498-A<\/a><a id=\"fnref1\" href=\"#fn1\" title=\"1. Corresponding Sections 85 and 86 of the Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.\"><sup>1<\/sup><\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\">Penal Code, 1860<\/a> (&#8216;IPC&#8217;). The Family Court had noted the findings that the wife had falsely lodged a prosecution against her husband under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561850\" target=\"_blank\">498-A<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\">IPC<\/a>, with a purpose not to bring home his guilt, but merely to change his behaviour.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court agreed with the Family Court&#8217;s findings and opined that such an act would certainly amount to cruelty as per Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001543733\" target=\"_blank\">13(1)(i-a)<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726956\" target=\"_blank\">1955 Act<\/a>. The Court observed that the husband and his family members being subjected to false criminal proceedings and the ordeal of such serious charges being faced by them that too because the wife wanted to correct the behaviour of the husband, would find no place in the harmonious relations of mutual trust, respect and affection, a married couple would normally maintain.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court opined that once there was dent to essential values, on the foundation of which a marriage rests, by a false action of a criminal prosecution being resorted by either spouse, it was in the realm of cruelty which would be a ground for divorce under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001543733\" target=\"_blank\">13(1)(i-a)<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726956\" target=\"_blank\">1955 Act<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court relied on <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Rani Narasimha Sastry<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Rani Suneela Rani<\/span>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/Members\/SearchResult.aspx\" target=\"_blank\">(2020) 18 SCC 247<\/a>; <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">K. Srinivas<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">K. Sunita<\/span>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/Members\/SearchResult.aspx\" target=\"_blank\">(2014) 16 SCC 34<\/a>; <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">K. Srinivas Rao<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">D.A. Deepa<\/span><\/span>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/Members\/SearchResult.aspx\" target=\"_blank\">(2013) 5 SCC 226<\/a> and opined that the action of resorting to false prosecution, on the wife&#8217;s part, was a sufficient ground entitling the husband for a divorce on the ground of cruelty.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court stated that the wife never realized the effect of the husband and his relatives being dragged into a false prosecution of such serious offences and the social stigma and unwarranted harassment caused to the husband and his family members was a significant aspect of their sufferings. Thus, the Court held that the Family Court correctly observed that a strong case for divorce on the ground of cruelty was made out by the husband to decree the marriage petition filed by him.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court rejected the present appeal as it did not find any perversity or illegality in the observations by the Judge of the Family Court in passing the impugned judgment and order.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">V v. R, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/o91Z4P4w\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2025 SCC OnLine Bom 58<\/a>, decided on 03-01-2025<\/span>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000080;\">*Judgment authored by: Justice G.S. Kulkarni<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the Appellant:<\/span> Omkar Nagvekar i\/b. Prabha U. Badadare for the appellant.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the Respondent:<\/span> Dushyant S. Pagare for the respondent.<\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Penal Code, 1860 &nbsp; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1158\" target=\"_blank\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1158\" target=\"_blank\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"penal code, 1860\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294601\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-768x511.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-440x293.jpg 440w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-650x433.jpg 650w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860.jpg 886w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-60x40.jpg 60w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<hr\/>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn1\" href=\"#fnref1\">1.<\/a> Corresponding Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9001803775\" target=\"_blank\">85<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9001803776\" target=\"_blank\">86<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9001804326\" target=\"_blank\">Nyaya Sanhita, 2023<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">Once the mind of a spouse is corrupted to resort to a false prosecution against a spouse, it is certain that the spouse has lost all reasonableness and rationality to maintain solemnity of the marriage.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":314919,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[2569,2570,77468,2846,66173,77423,67743,31299],"class_list":["post-338904","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-Bombay_High_Court","tag-Cruelty","tag-cruelty-to-husband","tag-divorce","tag-false-cases","tag-justice-advait-m-sethna","tag-justice-g-s-kulkarni","tag-section-498-a-ipc"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Wife filing false case under S.498-A IPC to correct husband\u2019s behaviour amounts to cruelty: Bombay HC | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Bombay High Court held that a wife filing a false prosecution case under Section 498-A of IPC to correct husband\u2019s behaviour, amounted to cruelty.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/13\/wife-filing-false-case-under-s498a-ipc-to-correct-husbands-behaviour-amounts-to-cruelty-bomhc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Wife filing false case under S.498-A IPC to correct husband\u2019s behaviour amounts to cruelty: Bombay HC\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Bombay High Court held that a wife filing a false prosecution case under Section 498-A of IPC to correct husband\u2019s behaviour, amounted to cruelty.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/13\/wife-filing-false-case-under-s498a-ipc-to-correct-husbands-behaviour-amounts-to-cruelty-bomhc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-01-13T10:00:16+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-01-18T05:22:18+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"591\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Simranjeet\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Wife filing false case under S.498-A IPC to correct husband\u2019s behaviour amounts to cruelty: Bombay HC\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Simranjeet\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/13\/wife-filing-false-case-under-s498a-ipc-to-correct-husbands-behaviour-amounts-to-cruelty-bomhc\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/13\/wife-filing-false-case-under-s498a-ipc-to-correct-husbands-behaviour-amounts-to-cruelty-bomhc\/\",\"name\":\"Wife filing false case under S.498-A IPC to correct husband\u2019s behaviour amounts to cruelty: Bombay HC | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/13\/wife-filing-false-case-under-s498a-ipc-to-correct-husbands-behaviour-amounts-to-cruelty-bomhc\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/13\/wife-filing-false-case-under-s498a-ipc-to-correct-husbands-behaviour-amounts-to-cruelty-bomhc\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-01-13T10:00:16+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-01-18T05:22:18+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/aaee99423671d3377042373c5dcdabbd\"},\"description\":\"Bombay High Court held that a wife filing a false prosecution case under Section 498-A of IPC to correct husband\u2019s behaviour, amounted to cruelty.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/13\/wife-filing-false-case-under-s498a-ipc-to-correct-husbands-behaviour-amounts-to-cruelty-bomhc\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/13\/wife-filing-false-case-under-s498a-ipc-to-correct-husbands-behaviour-amounts-to-cruelty-bomhc\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/13\/wife-filing-false-case-under-s498a-ipc-to-correct-husbands-behaviour-amounts-to-cruelty-bomhc\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp\",\"width\":887,\"height\":591,\"caption\":\"Bombay High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/13\/wife-filing-false-case-under-s498a-ipc-to-correct-husbands-behaviour-amounts-to-cruelty-bomhc\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Wife filing false case under S.498-A IPC to correct husband\u2019s behaviour amounts to cruelty: Bombay HC\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/aaee99423671d3377042373c5dcdabbd\",\"name\":\"Simranjeet\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/03d92c7ef8267a8c57730c194d10ea045f0dc6cb00ce27a633a2e25adccce1c9?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/03d92c7ef8267a8c57730c194d10ea045f0dc6cb00ce27a633a2e25adccce1c9?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Simranjeet\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Wife filing false case under S.498-A IPC to correct husband\u2019s behaviour amounts to cruelty: Bombay HC | SCC Times","description":"Bombay High Court held that a wife filing a false prosecution case under Section 498-A of IPC to correct husband\u2019s behaviour, amounted to cruelty.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/13\/wife-filing-false-case-under-s498a-ipc-to-correct-husbands-behaviour-amounts-to-cruelty-bomhc\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Wife filing false case under S.498-A IPC to correct husband\u2019s behaviour amounts to cruelty: Bombay HC","og_description":"Bombay High Court held that a wife filing a false prosecution case under Section 498-A of IPC to correct husband\u2019s behaviour, amounted to cruelty.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/13\/wife-filing-false-case-under-s498a-ipc-to-correct-husbands-behaviour-amounts-to-cruelty-bomhc\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2025-01-13T10:00:16+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-01-18T05:22:18+00:00","og_image":[{"width":887,"height":591,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Simranjeet","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Wife filing false case under S.498-A IPC to correct husband\u2019s behaviour amounts to cruelty: Bombay HC","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Simranjeet","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/13\/wife-filing-false-case-under-s498a-ipc-to-correct-husbands-behaviour-amounts-to-cruelty-bomhc\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/13\/wife-filing-false-case-under-s498a-ipc-to-correct-husbands-behaviour-amounts-to-cruelty-bomhc\/","name":"Wife filing false case under S.498-A IPC to correct husband\u2019s behaviour amounts to cruelty: Bombay HC | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/13\/wife-filing-false-case-under-s498a-ipc-to-correct-husbands-behaviour-amounts-to-cruelty-bomhc\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/13\/wife-filing-false-case-under-s498a-ipc-to-correct-husbands-behaviour-amounts-to-cruelty-bomhc\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp","datePublished":"2025-01-13T10:00:16+00:00","dateModified":"2025-01-18T05:22:18+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/aaee99423671d3377042373c5dcdabbd"},"description":"Bombay High Court held that a wife filing a false prosecution case under Section 498-A of IPC to correct husband\u2019s behaviour, amounted to cruelty.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/13\/wife-filing-false-case-under-s498a-ipc-to-correct-husbands-behaviour-amounts-to-cruelty-bomhc\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/13\/wife-filing-false-case-under-s498a-ipc-to-correct-husbands-behaviour-amounts-to-cruelty-bomhc\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/13\/wife-filing-false-case-under-s498a-ipc-to-correct-husbands-behaviour-amounts-to-cruelty-bomhc\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp","width":887,"height":591,"caption":"Bombay High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/13\/wife-filing-false-case-under-s498a-ipc-to-correct-husbands-behaviour-amounts-to-cruelty-bomhc\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Wife filing false case under S.498-A IPC to correct husband\u2019s behaviour amounts to cruelty: Bombay HC"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/aaee99423671d3377042373c5dcdabbd","name":"Simranjeet","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/03d92c7ef8267a8c57730c194d10ea045f0dc6cb00ce27a633a2e25adccce1c9?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/03d92c7ef8267a8c57730c194d10ea045f0dc6cb00ce27a633a2e25adccce1c9?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Simranjeet"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":266567,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/07\/irretrievable-breakdown-of-marriage-2\/","url_meta":{"origin":338904,"position":0},"title":"Irretrievable breakdown of Marriage: Chh HC dissolves marriage on appeal filed by husband against trial court order","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"May 7, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Chhattisgarh High Court: Sanjay S. Agrawal, J., reversed the judgment of the trial court and granted divorce in an application filed by the husband, while granting Rs 15 lakhs permanent alimony to the wife. Applicant-Husband had preferred an appeal under Section 28 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 questioning the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":276188,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/26\/labelling-husband-as-alcoholic-and-womanizer-without-any-basis-amounts-to-cruelty-u-s-131-hma-1955-bombay-high-court-grants-divorce\/","url_meta":{"origin":338904,"position":1},"title":"Labelling husband as alcoholic and womanizer without any basis amounts to &#8216;cruelty&#8217; u\/S 13(1) HMA, 1955; Bombay High Court grants divorce","author":"Editor","date":"October 26, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Bombay High Court: In an appeal filed by wife challenging the judgment and decree dated 22-11-2005, passed by the Family Court whereby the marriage was dissolved by a decree of divorce under Section 13 of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 on the ground that the allegations constitute an act\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Bombay High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":200265,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/18\/using-consent-for-dissolution-of-marriage-to-gain-advantage-in-other-litigations-constitute-cruelty-under-hindu-marriage-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":338904,"position":2},"title":"Using consent for dissolution of marriage to gain advantage in other litigations constitute \u2018cruelty\u2019 under Hindu Marriage Act  \u00a0","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 18, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Rajiv Sahai Endlaw, J. allowed an appeal filed under Section 28 of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 against the judgment of the Additional District Judge whereby the divorce petition filed by the husband was dismissed. One of the grounds claimed by the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":214038,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/29\/del-hc-divorce-granted-on-grounds-of-causing-wrongful-incarceration-of-husband-coupled-with-irretrievable-breakdown-of-marriage\/","url_meta":{"origin":338904,"position":3},"title":"Del HC | Divorce granted on grounds of causing wrongful incarceration of husband coupled with irretrievable breakdown of marriage","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"April 29, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court:\u00a0A Bench of Jyoti Singh and G.S. Sistani, JJ. allowed an appeal filed by the husband against the decision of the family court whereby it had granted a decree of judicial separation under Section 10 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 instead of a decree of divorce as\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":210564,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/22\/bom-hc-publicising-domestic-disputes-lodging-false-complaints-making-frivolous-allegations-amount-to-cruelty-and-are-grounds-for-divorce\/","url_meta":{"origin":338904,"position":4},"title":"Bom HC | Publicising domestic disputes, lodging false complaints, making frivolous allegations amount to cruelty and are grounds for divorce","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"February 22, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court:\u00a0In an interesting case, Vibha Kankanwadi, J. allowed an appeal filed by the husband against the order of the first appellate court wherein trial court's order granting divorce\u00a0to him against the respondent (wife) was reversed. Parties married to each-other at Solapur in 1999. They resided at Jalgaon since\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":268687,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/20\/wife-pressing-uncorroborated-allegations-on-husband-being-impotent-amounts-to-cruelty-under-s-131-ia-of-the-hindu-marriage-act-1955-kar-hc-grants-divorce\/","url_meta":{"origin":338904,"position":5},"title":"Wife pressing uncorroborated allegations on husband being impotent amounts to cruelty under S. 13(1) (ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955; Kar HC grants divorce","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"June 20, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"There is no straight-jacket formula when considering the term \u201ccruelty\u201d and it depends upon the established pleadings and evidence on record and the inference has to be drawn from the attending facts and circumstances taken cumulatively","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Karnataka High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/New_Karnataka.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/New_Karnataka.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/New_Karnataka.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/New_Karnataka.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/New_Karnataka.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/338904","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=338904"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/338904\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/314919"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=338904"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=338904"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=338904"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}