{"id":338794,"date":"2025-01-10T13:00:21","date_gmt":"2025-01-10T07:30:21","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=338794"},"modified":"2025-01-18T10:30:09","modified_gmt":"2025-01-18T05:00:09","slug":"sc-stays-hc-decision-declaring-hindu-fisherman-as-foreigner-denying-benefit-caa","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/10\/sc-stays-hc-decision-declaring-hindu-fisherman-as-foreigner-denying-benefit-caa\/","title":{"rendered":"SC to consider an alleged Hindu fisherman\u2019s case for Indian citizenship and benefit under CAA; stays HC\u2019s decision declaring him as \u2018foreigner\u2019, issues notice"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Supreme Court:<\/span> In a special leave petition (criminal) by an Indian citizen against a decision of Gauhati High Court, whereby his petition assailing the decision rendered by the Foreigners Tribunal, Morigaon, Assam was dismissed and affirmed the view that he was foreigner, the Division Bench of PS Narasimha and Manoj Misra, JJ. allowed the petition and issued notice. The Court also stayed the operation of the impugned decision.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The petitioner is Hindu fisherman and has been living with his family members including his wife and three sons who have been declared as Indian citizens, except the present petitioner by the High Court in <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Arabinda Biswas<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Union of India<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/U6gqU9H3\" target=\"_blank\">2024 SCC OnLine Gau 423<\/a>. As per the requirement under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001548975\" target=\"_blank\">9<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002780398\" target=\"_blank\">Foreigners Act, 1946<\/a>, the petitioner and his family were required to prove that they were not foreigners. The petitioner&#8217;s case was that the High Court set aside the Tribunal&#8217;s decision to the extent of declaring his wife and three sons as foreigners and viewed them as Indian citizens. The petitioner contended that he is a Hindu and migrated from Bangladesh prior to 31-12-2014, hence, entitled to have the benefit of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9000335445\" target=\"_blank\">Citizenship Amendment Act, 2019<\/a> passed by the Parliament and he is entitled for the legislative protection, and not treated as illegal migrant. The petitioner&#8217;s plea was that he is suffering from cancer, and it is not possible for him to be isolated from his family, who have been declared as &#8216;Indian Citizen&#8217;.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Section 9- Burden of proof. &#8212;<span style=\"font-style: italic;\">If in any case not falling under Section 8 any question arises with reference to this Act or any order made or direction given thereunder, whether any person is or is not a foreigner or is or is not a foreigner of a particular class or description the onus of proving that such person is not a foreigner or is not a foreigner of such particular class or description, as the case may be, shall, notwithstanding anything contained in the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726934\" target=\"_blank\">Indian Evidence Act, 1872<\/a>, lie upon such person.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The petitioner also contended that the Tribunal has declared the petitioner and his as foreigners post 25-03-1971, without even considering their case and without looking into the various documents exhibited relating to voters list from various years and birth certificates of their children.<\/p>\n<p><!--\n\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Arabinda Biswas v. Union of India, Diary No(s). 54320\/2024, decided on: 02-01-2025<\/span>]<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n<hr\/>\n\n\n\n\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For Petitioners:<\/span> Pijush K. Roy, Sr. Adv.; Kakali Roy, Adv.; Rajan K. Chourasia, AOR<\/p>\n\n--><\/p>\n<div style=\"text-overflow: ellipsis; background-color: #92A8D1; text-align:justify; clear:both; text-size-adjust: auto; overflow: auto;\">\n<p style=\"font-size: 18pt; margin-top: 5px; text-align: center;\">CASE DETAILS<\/p>\n<table width=\"100%\" style=\"word-wrap: break-word; border-collapse:collapse; table-layout: fixed; margin-top: 10px;\">\n<colgroup>\n<col width=\"41%\"\/>\n<col width=\"59%\"\/>\n<\/colgroup>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td valign=\"top\">\n<p><span style=\"color: #D4E4F7; font-weight: bold;\">Citation:<\/span><br \/> <span style=\"color: #D4E4F7; font-size: 10pt;\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/45y1X6Pr\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2025 SCC OnLine SC 74<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #D4E4F7; font-weight: bold;\">Appellants&#160;:<\/span><br \/> Arabinda Biswas<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #D4E4F7; font-weight: bold;\">Respondents&#160;:<\/span><br \/> Union of India<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td valign=\"top\">\n<p style=\"color: #D4E4F7; font-weight: bold;\">Advocates who appeared in this case<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #D4E4F7; font-weight: bold;\">For Petitioner(s):<\/span><br \/> Pijush K. Roy, Sr. Adv.; Kakali Roy, Adv.; Rajan K. Chourasia, AOR<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #D4E4F7; font-weight: bold;\">For Respondent(s):<\/span> <\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p style=\"font-size: 12pt; margin-top: -20px; margin-left: 5px;\"><span style=\"color: #D4E4F7; font-weight: bold;\">CORAM&#160;:<\/span><\/p>\n<div id=\"banner\" style=\"overflow: hidden; display: flex; justify-content: space-between; padding-left: 3%;\">\n<div class=\"\" style=\"max-width: 100%; max-height: 100%; font-size: 9pt; text-align: center;\">\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" height=\"100px\" width=\"100px\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scobserver.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/33.-Narasimha-modified.png\" alt=\"PS Narasimha, J.\" style=\"border-radius: 50%;\"><br \/><span style=\"color: black !important;\">PS Narasimha, J.<\/span><\/img><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"\" style=\"max-width: 100%; max-height: 100%; font-size: 9pt; text-align: center;\">\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" height=\"100px\" width=\"100px\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scobserver.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/Manoj-Misra-Circle.png\" alt=\"Manoj Misra, J.\" style=\"border-radius: 50%;\"><br \/><span style=\"color: black !important;\">Manoj Misra, J.<\/span><\/img><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"\" style=\"max-width: 100%; max-height: 100%;\"><\/div>\n<div class=\"\" style=\"max-width: 100%; max-height: 100%;\"><\/div>\n<div class=\"\" style=\"max-width: 100%; max-height: 100%;\"><\/div>\n<div class=\"\" style=\"max-width: 100%; max-height: 100%;\"><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">The petitioner&#8217;s case was that he is a Hindu and migrated from Bangladesh prior to 31-12-2014, hence, entitled to have the benefit of Citizenship Amendment Act, 2019 passed by the Parliament and cannot be treated as illegal migrant.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67517,"featured_media":338805,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,9],"tags":[77408,38967,38854,37843,52071,77407,45925,44635,5363],"class_list":["post-338794","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-supremecourt","tag-benefit-under-caa","tag-caa","tag-citizenship-amendment-act-2019","tag-foreigner","tag-gauhati-hc","tag-hindu-fisherman","tag-indian-citizen","tag-sc","tag-supreme-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>SC stays HC decision declaring Hindu fisherman as foreigner, denying benefit under CAA | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Supreme Court stays Gauhati HC&#039;s decision declaring Hindu fisherman as foreigner, denying benefit under CAA 2019\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/10\/sc-stays-hc-decision-declaring-hindu-fisherman-as-foreigner-denying-benefit-caa\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"SC to consider an alleged Hindu fisherman\u2019s case for Indian citizenship and benefit under CAA; stays HC\u2019s decision declaring him as \u2018foreigner\u2019, issues notice\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Supreme Court stays Gauhati HC&#039;s decision declaring Hindu fisherman as foreigner, denying benefit under CAA 2019\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/10\/sc-stays-hc-decision-declaring-hindu-fisherman-as-foreigner-denying-benefit-caa\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-01-10T07:30:21+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-01-18T05:00:09+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/Foreigner-under-CAA.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"SC to consider an alleged Hindu fisherman\u2019s case for Indian citizenship and benefit under CAA; stays HC\u2019s decision declaring him as \u2018foreigner\u2019, issues notice\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/10\/sc-stays-hc-decision-declaring-hindu-fisherman-as-foreigner-denying-benefit-caa\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/10\/sc-stays-hc-decision-declaring-hindu-fisherman-as-foreigner-denying-benefit-caa\/\",\"name\":\"SC stays HC decision declaring Hindu fisherman as foreigner, denying benefit under CAA | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/10\/sc-stays-hc-decision-declaring-hindu-fisherman-as-foreigner-denying-benefit-caa\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/10\/sc-stays-hc-decision-declaring-hindu-fisherman-as-foreigner-denying-benefit-caa\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/Foreigner-under-CAA.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-01-10T07:30:21+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-01-18T05:00:09+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84913f82186a8dea042dc300d5751624\"},\"description\":\"Supreme Court stays Gauhati HC's decision declaring Hindu fisherman as foreigner, denying benefit under CAA 2019\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/10\/sc-stays-hc-decision-declaring-hindu-fisherman-as-foreigner-denying-benefit-caa\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/10\/sc-stays-hc-decision-declaring-hindu-fisherman-as-foreigner-denying-benefit-caa\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/10\/sc-stays-hc-decision-declaring-hindu-fisherman-as-foreigner-denying-benefit-caa\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/Foreigner-under-CAA.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/Foreigner-under-CAA.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"Foreigner under CAA\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/10\/sc-stays-hc-decision-declaring-hindu-fisherman-as-foreigner-denying-benefit-caa\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"SC to consider an alleged Hindu fisherman\u2019s case for Indian citizenship and benefit under CAA; stays HC\u2019s decision declaring him as \u2018foreigner\u2019, issues notice\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84913f82186a8dea042dc300d5751624\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d822f35f9fcd11386aa47345cde7945e45a64da7205eebe9784f21d0cd223603?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d822f35f9fcd11386aa47345cde7945e45a64da7205eebe9784f21d0cd223603?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc-online-editor\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"SC stays HC decision declaring Hindu fisherman as foreigner, denying benefit under CAA | SCC Times","description":"Supreme Court stays Gauhati HC's decision declaring Hindu fisherman as foreigner, denying benefit under CAA 2019","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/10\/sc-stays-hc-decision-declaring-hindu-fisherman-as-foreigner-denying-benefit-caa\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"SC to consider an alleged Hindu fisherman\u2019s case for Indian citizenship and benefit under CAA; stays HC\u2019s decision declaring him as \u2018foreigner\u2019, issues notice","og_description":"Supreme Court stays Gauhati HC's decision declaring Hindu fisherman as foreigner, denying benefit under CAA 2019","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/10\/sc-stays-hc-decision-declaring-hindu-fisherman-as-foreigner-denying-benefit-caa\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2025-01-10T07:30:21+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-01-18T05:00:09+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/Foreigner-under-CAA.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"SC to consider an alleged Hindu fisherman\u2019s case for Indian citizenship and benefit under CAA; stays HC\u2019s decision declaring him as \u2018foreigner\u2019, issues notice","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/10\/sc-stays-hc-decision-declaring-hindu-fisherman-as-foreigner-denying-benefit-caa\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/10\/sc-stays-hc-decision-declaring-hindu-fisherman-as-foreigner-denying-benefit-caa\/","name":"SC stays HC decision declaring Hindu fisherman as foreigner, denying benefit under CAA | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/10\/sc-stays-hc-decision-declaring-hindu-fisherman-as-foreigner-denying-benefit-caa\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/10\/sc-stays-hc-decision-declaring-hindu-fisherman-as-foreigner-denying-benefit-caa\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/Foreigner-under-CAA.webp","datePublished":"2025-01-10T07:30:21+00:00","dateModified":"2025-01-18T05:00:09+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84913f82186a8dea042dc300d5751624"},"description":"Supreme Court stays Gauhati HC's decision declaring Hindu fisherman as foreigner, denying benefit under CAA 2019","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/10\/sc-stays-hc-decision-declaring-hindu-fisherman-as-foreigner-denying-benefit-caa\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/10\/sc-stays-hc-decision-declaring-hindu-fisherman-as-foreigner-denying-benefit-caa\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/10\/sc-stays-hc-decision-declaring-hindu-fisherman-as-foreigner-denying-benefit-caa\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/Foreigner-under-CAA.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/Foreigner-under-CAA.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"Foreigner under CAA"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/10\/sc-stays-hc-decision-declaring-hindu-fisherman-as-foreigner-denying-benefit-caa\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"SC to consider an alleged Hindu fisherman\u2019s case for Indian citizenship and benefit under CAA; stays HC\u2019s decision declaring him as \u2018foreigner\u2019, issues notice"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84913f82186a8dea042dc300d5751624","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d822f35f9fcd11386aa47345cde7945e45a64da7205eebe9784f21d0cd223603?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d822f35f9fcd11386aa47345cde7945e45a64da7205eebe9784f21d0cd223603?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc-online-editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/Foreigner-under-CAA.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":310777,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/05\/assam-foreigners-tribunal-proof-indian-citizenship-illegal-migrants-caa-gauhati-hc-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":338794,"position":0},"title":"Gauhati HC upholds judgment by Foreigners Tribunal declaring a woman to be a foreigner who entered India illegally","author":"Editor","date":"January 5, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Gauhati HC opined that the petitioner failed to discharge her burden to prove the contents of her evidence so as to establish her Indian citizenship.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"gauhati high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/gauhati-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/gauhati-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/gauhati-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/gauhati-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":235351,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/04\/gau-hc-granting-opportunity-for-identification-and-declaration-of-individual-of-foreign-nationality-to-establish-claim-of-indian-citizenship-cannot-be-enlarged-to-ceaseless-exercise-under-foreigners\/","url_meta":{"origin":338794,"position":1},"title":"Gau HC | Granting opportunity for identification and declaration of individual of foreign nationality to establish claim of Indian citizenship cannot be enlarged to ceaseless exercise under Foreigners Act","author":"Editor","date":"September 4, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Gauhati High Court: A Division Bench of Manojit Bhuyan and Hitesh Kumar Sarma, JJ. upheld the ex-parte order of the Foreigners\u2019 Tribunal and dismissed the writ petition. In the present appeal, the petitioner assailed the ex-parte order passed by the Foreigners\u2019 Tribunal declaring him to be a foreigner, having illegally\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":247439,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/04\/21\/citizenship\/","url_meta":{"origin":338794,"position":2},"title":"Gau HC | [NRC] Citizenship cannot be denied merely because linkage with relatives was not shown; HC sets aside order of Tribunal declaring man a foreigner","author":"Editor","date":"April 21, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Gauhati High Court:\u00a0 The Division Bench of N. Kotiswar Singh and Manish Chaudhury, JJ., set aside the impugned order of the Foreign Tribunal whereby the Tribunal had declared the petitioner non-Indian on the ground of him having failed to prove his ancestral linkage with his father\u2019s relatives. Factual Matrix of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":224092,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/10\/citizenship-amendment-act-row-country-is-going-through-difficult-times-sc-while-refusing-urgent-hearing-on-plea-seeking-to-declare-caa-as-constitutional\/","url_meta":{"origin":338794,"position":3},"title":"Citizenship (Amendment) Act row| Country is going through difficult times: SC while refusing urgent hearing on plea seeking to declare CAA as constitutional","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"January 10, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: Refusing urgent hearing on a plea seeking to declare the Citizenship Amendment Act as constitutional, CJI S A Bobde observed that the country is going through difficult times and there is so much violence going. Expressing surprise over the petition, the bench said that this was the first\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Hot Off The Press&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Hot Off The Press","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/hot_off_the_press\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":289983,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/18\/supreme-court-issues-notice-to-delhi-government-and-police-over-anurag-thakur-and-parvesh-verma-hate-speech-legal-news-legal-research-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":338794,"position":4},"title":"Supreme Court issues notice to Delhi Government and Police over Anurag Thakur and Parvesh Verma hate speeches during anti CAA protests","author":"Apoorva","date":"April 18, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: In a petition filed seeking registration of a criminal case against BJP leaders Anurag Thakur and Parvesh Verma for their alleged hate speeches during the protests against the Citizenship Amendment Act, 2019 (\u2018CAA\u2019), the division bench of KM Joseph and BV Nagarathna, JJ. said that the reasoning of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Hot Off The Press&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Hot Off The Press","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/hot_off_the_press\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"anurag thakur parvesh verma hate speech case","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/anurag-thakur-parvesh-verma-hate-speech-case.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/anurag-thakur-parvesh-verma-hate-speech-case.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/anurag-thakur-parvesh-verma-hate-speech-case.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/anurag-thakur-parvesh-verma-hate-speech-case.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":225386,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/10\/citizenship-amendment-act-row-sc-observes-that-shaheen-bagh-protesters-cant-block-public-roads-indefinitely-but-refuses-to-pass-any-interim-order\/","url_meta":{"origin":338794,"position":5},"title":"Citizenship (Amendment) Act Row| SC observes that Shaheen Bagh protesters can&#8217;t block public roads indefinitely but refuses to pass any interim order","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"February 10, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court:\u00a0A bench of SK Kaul and KM Joseph has said that the protesters at Shaheen Bagh cannot block public road and create inconvenience for others. Issuing notice to Delhi Government & Delhi Police, the Court posted the matter on February 17, 2020 and said, \"Protest has been going on\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Hot Off The Press&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Hot Off The Press","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/hot_off_the_press\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/338794","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67517"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=338794"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/338794\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/338805"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=338794"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=338794"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=338794"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}