{"id":338496,"date":"2025-01-06T16:00:19","date_gmt":"2025-01-06T10:30:19","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=338496"},"modified":"2025-01-08T13:06:02","modified_gmt":"2025-01-08T07:36:02","slug":"right-to-pray-as-per-religion-under-article-25-cant-be-denied-solely-due-to-objections-from-member-of-one-community-mp-high-court-scc-times","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/06\/right-to-pray-as-per-religion-under-article-25-cant-be-denied-solely-due-to-objections-from-member-of-one-community-mp-high-court-scc-times\/","title":{"rendered":"Right to pray under Article 25 cannot be denied solely due to objections from member of one community: MP High Court"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Madhya Pradesh High Court:<\/span> In a writ petition filed by a Christian resident of Village Gadwada, District Jhabua seeking quashment of the Sub-Divisional Magistrate (SDM), Meghnagar&#8217;s order revoking permission to organize a New Year prayer meeting, a single-judge bench of Subodh Abhyankar, J., upheld the petitioner&#8217;s fundamental rights to pray and permitted the petitioner to hold the prayer meeting as per the earlier granted permission.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In the instant matter, the petitioner made an application before the SDM seeking permission to organize a New Year prayer meeting. The application was submitted on 12-12-2024 and permission was granted on 19-12-2024, with certain conditions. Subsequently, on 28-12-2024, the SDM revoked the permission citing objections from Vishva Hindu Parishad, Malwa Region, alleging the event might disrupt communal harmony. The petitioner was neither informed nor granted an opportunity to be heard before this revocation.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The petitioner argued that the annual prayer meeting had been conducted peacefully in prior years, including 2023, and the revocation violated his fundamental rights guaranteed under Articles <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001574870\" target=\"_blank\">14<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001574926\" target=\"_blank\">19(1)(a)<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001574926\" target=\"_blank\">19(1)(b)<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001574949\" target=\"_blank\">21<\/a>, and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001575050\" target=\"_blank\">25<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\" target=\"_blank\">Constitution of India<\/a>. The petitioner filed the present writ petition seeking the quashment the SDM&#8217;s order and requested police protection for the event.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The petitioner contended that the annual prayer meeting has been conducted peacefully in prior years without communal disruptions. It was stated that the order was passed without affording the petitioner an opportunity of being heard, violating the principles of natural justice. It was argued that the revocation was arbitrary and solely based on objections from members of another community. However, the State contended that the SDM&#8217;s decision was based on apprehensions of disruption to communal harmony and was not illegal.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court noted that the petitioner had been conducting similar programs for years without disrupting communal harmony. The Court observed that the petitioner&#8217;s right to organize and participate in a religious event is protected under Article <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001575050\" target=\"_blank\">25<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\" target=\"_blank\">Constitution of India<\/a> and merely based on certain objections raised by the member of one community it cannot be denied. The Court held that the petitioner was deprived of his valuable right to be heard before passing of an adverse order against him.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court deemed the SDM&#8217;s order as arbitrary as it was based solely on objections from a third party and passed without granting the petitioner an opportunity of being heard, violating the principles of natural justice.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court quashed the SDM&#8217;s order dated 28-12-2024, revoking the permission. The Court allowed the petitioner was permitted to hold the prayer meeting as previously authorized on 19-12-2024. The Court directed the Collector, Jhabua, to ensure that the event is conducted peacefully without disruption.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Vijay Katara<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Principal Secretary<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/wz6MrDd8\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2025 SCC OnLine MP 1<\/a>, Decided on 01-01-2025<\/span>]<\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">Shri Rajesh Joshi, <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Counsel for the Petitioner<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">Shri Mayank Mishra, P.L.\/G.A., <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Counsel for the Respondents\/State<\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">The petitioner&#8217;s right to organize and participate in a religious event is protected under Article 25 of the Constitution of India and merely based on certain objections raised by the member of one community, it cannot be denied.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67514,"featured_media":317738,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[10321,68669,32050,3268,66889,7201,2805,77228,63142,77227,77229],"class_list":["post-338496","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-article-25","tag-communal-harmony","tag-freedom-of-religion","tag-Fundamental_Rights","tag-justice-subodh-abhyankar","tag-madhya-pradesh-high-court","tag-natural_justice","tag-prayer-meeting","tag-right-to-assemble","tag-right-to-assemble-and-pray","tag-right-to-pray"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Right to pray as per religion under Article 25 can&#039;t be denied solely due to objections from member of one community: MP High Court | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"MP High Court held that right to pray as per religion under Article 25 can&#039;t be denied solely due to objections from member of one community.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/06\/right-to-pray-as-per-religion-under-article-25-cant-be-denied-solely-due-to-objections-from-member-of-one-community-mp-high-court-scc-times\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Right to pray under Article 25 cannotbe denied solely due to objections from member of one community: MP High Court\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"MP High Court held that right to pray as per religion under Article 25 can&#039;t be denied solely due to objections from member of one community.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/06\/right-to-pray-as-per-religion-under-article-25-cant-be-denied-solely-due-to-objections-from-member-of-one-community-mp-high-court-scc-times\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-01-06T10:30:19+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-01-08T07:36:02+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"591\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Right to pray under Article 25 cannot be denied solely due to objections from member of one community: MP High Court\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/06\/right-to-pray-as-per-religion-under-article-25-cant-be-denied-solely-due-to-objections-from-member-of-one-community-mp-high-court-scc-times\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/06\/right-to-pray-as-per-religion-under-article-25-cant-be-denied-solely-due-to-objections-from-member-of-one-community-mp-high-court-scc-times\/\",\"name\":\"Right to pray as per religion under Article 25 can't be denied solely due to objections from member of one community: MP High Court | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/06\/right-to-pray-as-per-religion-under-article-25-cant-be-denied-solely-due-to-objections-from-member-of-one-community-mp-high-court-scc-times\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/06\/right-to-pray-as-per-religion-under-article-25-cant-be-denied-solely-due-to-objections-from-member-of-one-community-mp-high-court-scc-times\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-01-06T10:30:19+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-01-08T07:36:02+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\"},\"description\":\"MP High Court held that right to pray as per religion under Article 25 can't be denied solely due to objections from member of one community.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/06\/right-to-pray-as-per-religion-under-article-25-cant-be-denied-solely-due-to-objections-from-member-of-one-community-mp-high-court-scc-times\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/06\/right-to-pray-as-per-religion-under-article-25-cant-be-denied-solely-due-to-objections-from-member-of-one-community-mp-high-court-scc-times\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/06\/right-to-pray-as-per-religion-under-article-25-cant-be-denied-solely-due-to-objections-from-member-of-one-community-mp-high-court-scc-times\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp\",\"width\":887,\"height\":591,\"caption\":\"Madhya Pradesh High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/06\/right-to-pray-as-per-religion-under-article-25-cant-be-denied-solely-due-to-objections-from-member-of-one-community-mp-high-court-scc-times\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Right to pray under Article 25 cannot be denied solely due to objections from member of one community: MP High Court\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\",\"name\":\"Ritu\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Ritu\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_7\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Right to pray as per religion under Article 25 can't be denied solely due to objections from member of one community: MP High Court | SCC Times","description":"MP High Court held that right to pray as per religion under Article 25 can't be denied solely due to objections from member of one community.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/06\/right-to-pray-as-per-religion-under-article-25-cant-be-denied-solely-due-to-objections-from-member-of-one-community-mp-high-court-scc-times\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Right to pray under Article 25 cannotbe denied solely due to objections from member of one community: MP High Court","og_description":"MP High Court held that right to pray as per religion under Article 25 can't be denied solely due to objections from member of one community.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/06\/right-to-pray-as-per-religion-under-article-25-cant-be-denied-solely-due-to-objections-from-member-of-one-community-mp-high-court-scc-times\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2025-01-06T10:30:19+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-01-08T07:36:02+00:00","og_image":[{"width":887,"height":591,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Ritu","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Right to pray under Article 25 cannot be denied solely due to objections from member of one community: MP High Court","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Ritu","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/06\/right-to-pray-as-per-religion-under-article-25-cant-be-denied-solely-due-to-objections-from-member-of-one-community-mp-high-court-scc-times\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/06\/right-to-pray-as-per-religion-under-article-25-cant-be-denied-solely-due-to-objections-from-member-of-one-community-mp-high-court-scc-times\/","name":"Right to pray as per religion under Article 25 can't be denied solely due to objections from member of one community: MP High Court | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/06\/right-to-pray-as-per-religion-under-article-25-cant-be-denied-solely-due-to-objections-from-member-of-one-community-mp-high-court-scc-times\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/06\/right-to-pray-as-per-religion-under-article-25-cant-be-denied-solely-due-to-objections-from-member-of-one-community-mp-high-court-scc-times\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp","datePublished":"2025-01-06T10:30:19+00:00","dateModified":"2025-01-08T07:36:02+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9"},"description":"MP High Court held that right to pray as per religion under Article 25 can't be denied solely due to objections from member of one community.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/06\/right-to-pray-as-per-religion-under-article-25-cant-be-denied-solely-due-to-objections-from-member-of-one-community-mp-high-court-scc-times\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/06\/right-to-pray-as-per-religion-under-article-25-cant-be-denied-solely-due-to-objections-from-member-of-one-community-mp-high-court-scc-times\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/06\/right-to-pray-as-per-religion-under-article-25-cant-be-denied-solely-due-to-objections-from-member-of-one-community-mp-high-court-scc-times\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp","width":887,"height":591,"caption":"Madhya Pradesh High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/06\/right-to-pray-as-per-religion-under-article-25-cant-be-denied-solely-due-to-objections-from-member-of-one-community-mp-high-court-scc-times\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Right to pray under Article 25 cannot be denied solely due to objections from member of one community: MP High Court"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9","name":"Ritu","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Ritu"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_7\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":319583,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/06\/mp-hc-imposes-exemplary-cost-of-rs-150000-on-all-parties-for-treating-court-as-playground-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":338496,"position":0},"title":"Madhya Pradesh High Court imposes exemplary cost of Rs. 1,50,000\/- on parties for treating court as playground","author":"Ritu","date":"April 6, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Madhya Pradesh High Court note that questions regarding the petitioner\u2019s status in the ancestral house and the subsequent eviction suit cannot be adjudicated in Section 482 CrPC petition.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madhya Pradesh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":77601,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/10\/11\/appointment-of-addl-judges-madhya-pradesh-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":338496,"position":1},"title":"Appointment of Addl. Judges, Madhya Pradesh HC","author":"Saba","date":"October 11, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"The President in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (1) of Article 224 of the Constitution of India appointed Shri Vijay Kumar Shukla, Shri Gurpal Singh Ahluwalia and Shri Subodh Abhyankar, to be Additional Judges of the Madhya Pradesh High Court, in that order of seniority, for a period\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Appointments &amp; Transfers&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Appointments &amp; Transfers","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/appointments\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":324087,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/11\/non-disclosure-of-right-to-terminate-pregnancy-by-police-doctors-violates-minor-rape-survivors-dignity-mp-hc-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":338496,"position":2},"title":"Non-disclosure of Right to Terminate Pregnancy by Police\/Doctors violates Minor Rape Survivor\u2019s Right to live with dignity: MP High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"June 11, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court criticised the investigating officer and the treating doctor for not informing the survivor's family about the pregnancy and the option for termination, considering the survivor\u2019s minor status and health risks.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madhya Pradesh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":162664,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/10\/11\/right-conduct-public-meeting-held-fundamental-right\/","url_meta":{"origin":338496,"position":3},"title":"Right to conduct a public meeting held to be a fundamental right","author":"Saba","date":"October 11, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Madras High Court: The petitioner, an organization involved in social activities for the benefit of general public intending to organize a public meeting to address the issue of corruption in Tamil Nadu, had submitted a request to the Inspector of Police, Mylapore, seeking permission to organize a public meeting in\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":347347,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/08\/mp-hc-quashes-improper-implementation-of-reservation-rules-in-selection-process-directs-reconsideration-of-obc-female-candidates-candidature-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":338496,"position":4},"title":"MP High Court quashes improper implementation of Reservation Rules in Selection Process; directs reconsideration of OBC female candidate\u2019s candidature","author":"Ritu","date":"May 8, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThis Court is inclined to dispose of this petition with a direction to the respondents No.2\/3 to follow the proper procedure as prescribed under Rule 11.2 and 11.3 of the Rules of 2013.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madhya Pradesh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":193869,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/03\/08\/17-additional-judges-madhya-pradesh-hc-appointed-permanent-judges\/","url_meta":{"origin":338496,"position":5},"title":"17 Additional Judges of Madhya Pradesh HC appointed as Permanent Judges","author":"Saba","date":"March 8, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"The President in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (1) of Article 217 of the Constitution of India, appointed S\/Shri Justices (i) Atul Sreedharan, (ii) Sushrut Arvind Dharmadhikari, (iii)\u00a0 Vivek Rusia, (iv) Anand Pathak, (v) .Jagdish Prasad Gupta, (vi) Anurag Kumar Shrivastava, (vii) Housla Prasad Singh, (viii) Ashok Kumar\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Appointments &amp; Transfers&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Appointments &amp; Transfers","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/appointments\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/338496","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67514"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=338496"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/338496\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/317738"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=338496"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=338496"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=338496"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}