{"id":338438,"date":"2025-01-05T09:00:01","date_gmt":"2025-01-05T03:30:01","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=338438"},"modified":"2025-01-10T10:33:07","modified_gmt":"2025-01-10T05:03:07","slug":"compliance-with-section-16-of-carriage-by-road-act-is-a-pre-condition-for-instituting-suit-for-consignment-loss-rajasthan-high-court-scc-times","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/05\/compliance-with-section-16-of-carriage-by-road-act-is-a-pre-condition-for-instituting-suit-for-consignment-loss-rajasthan-high-court-scc-times\/","title":{"rendered":"Compliance with Section 16 of Carriage by Road Act a pre-condition for instituting suit for consignment loss: Rajasthan High Court"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Rajasthan High Court:<\/span> In a civil revision challenging trial court’s order allowing the defendant to participate in the suit proceedings when the recovery suit is non-maintainable, a single-judge bench of Ashok Kumar Jain, J., held that compliance with Section 16<\/a> of the Carriage by Road Act, 2007<\/a> is a mandatory requirement for instituting a suit against a common carrier for loss or damage to a consignment and set aside the trial court’s order.<\/p>\n

In the instant matter, a consignment booked by defendant 2, M\/s. K.S. Commodities Pvt. Ltd. through the petitioner-defendant 1, Amrit Transport Co., was looted in transit. An FIR was filed, and compensation was claimed under a marine policy issued by the plaintiff- respondent 1, Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd.<\/p>\n

The plaintiff, after compensating the consignee, filed a civil suit for recovery of \u20b92,71,717\/- against petitioner, alleging failure to safely deliver goods consigned by defendant 2 which were looted en route to Wagha Border (Punjab). The plaintiff relied on a claim bill dated 03.03.2014 as a notice under Section 16<\/a> of the Carriage by Road Act, 2007<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Initially, the suit was decreed ex-parte on 09-09-2019. The ex-parte decree was set aside upon the defendant’s application under Order IX Rule 13<\/a> of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908<\/a> (CPC), allowing the defendant to participate in the proceedings. The defendant subsequently filed an application under Order VII Rule 11<\/a> CPC<\/a>, arguing that no notice was served under Section 16<\/a> of the Carriage by Road Act, 2007<\/a>, making the suit non-maintainable.<\/p>\n

The main issue in the instant matter is whether a claim voucher submitted by the plaintiff could be treated as a notice under Section 16<\/a> of the Carriage by Road Act, 2007<\/a>.<\/p>\n

The Petitioner contended that Section 16 of the Carriage by Road Act mandates serving a written notice before filing a suit for loss or damage to consignment and the plaintiff failed to comply with this requirement. It was contended that the claim bill produced by the plaintiff did not qualify as a valid notice under the law as it lacked essential elements such as a clear demand for compensation or an assertion of liability. The petitioner cited Essemm Logistics<\/span> v. Darcl Logistics Ltd.<\/span>, (2023) 9 SCC 753<\/a>, where the Supreme Court held that a specific notice setting out the cause of action and relief is mandatory for claims involving loss of consignment.<\/p>\n

The Court noted that Section 16 of the Carriage by Road Act explicitly requires a written notice to be served on the common carrier within 180 days of the consignment’s booking before instituting a suit. The Court affirmed that the Supreme Court’s interpretation in Essemm Logistics (Supra) makes notice a mandatory requirement for claims regarding loss of consignment.<\/p>\n

The Court stated that the claim voucher produced by the plaintiff did not fulfill the purpose of a notice, as it failed to clearly demand compensation or set out the cause of action and relief. The Court stated that a valid notice under Section 16 must explicitly outline the cause of action, damage, loss, and relief sought.<\/p>\n

The Court asserted that the trial court has committed a serious error while construing the provision under Section 16 of the Carriage by Road Act as no notice was served upon the petitioner before filing a suit for recovery of money.<\/p>\n

The Court set aside the trial court’s order, dismissed the plaintiff’s suit for non-compliance with Section 16 of the Carriage by Road Act and allowed the application under Order VII Rule 11<\/a> CPC<\/a>. The Court granted liberty to the plaintiff to institute a fresh suit after complying with the mandatory notice requirement under Section 16 of the Carriage by Road Act.<\/p>\n

[Amrit Transport Co.<\/span> v. Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd.<\/span>, 2024 SCC OnLine Raj 3542<\/a>, Decided on 16-12-2024<\/span>]<\/p>\n\n

Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n

Mr. Abhishek Bhardwaj with Mr. Shantanu Sharma, Counsel for the Petitioner<\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

A valid notice under Section 16 of the Carriage by Road Act, 2007 must explicitly outline the cause of action, damage, loss, and relief sought.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67514,"featured_media":314824,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[77206,54311,77207,3343,70237,65080,45815,22434,2575,31762,77205],"class_list":["post-338438","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-carriage-by-road-act","tag-civil-revision","tag-consignment-loss","tag-ex-parte_decree","tag-justice-ashok-kumar-jain","tag-mandatory-compliance","tag-order-ix-rule-13-cpc","tag-order-vii-rule-11-cpc","tag-Rajasthan_High_Court","tag-recovery-suit","tag-section-16-of-carriage-by-road-act"],"yoast_head":"\nCompliance with Section 16 of Carriage by Road Act is a pre-condition for instituting suit for consignment loss: Rajasthan High Court | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Rajasthan High Court held that compliance with Section 16 of Carriage by Road Act is a pre-condition for instituting suit for consignment loss.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/05\/compliance-with-section-16-of-carriage-by-road-act-is-a-pre-condition-for-instituting-suit-for-consignment-loss-rajasthan-high-court-scc-times\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Compliance with Section 16 of Carriage by Road Act a pre-condition for instituting suit for consignment loss: Rajasthan High Court\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Rajasthan High Court held that compliance with Section 16 of Carriage by Road Act is a pre-condition for instituting suit for consignment loss.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/05\/compliance-with-section-16-of-carriage-by-road-act-is-a-pre-condition-for-instituting-suit-for-consignment-loss-rajasthan-high-court-scc-times\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-01-05T03:30:01+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-01-10T05:03:07+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"591\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Compliance with Section 16 of Carriage by Road Act a pre-condition for instituting suit for consignment loss: Rajasthan High Court\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/05\/compliance-with-section-16-of-carriage-by-road-act-is-a-pre-condition-for-instituting-suit-for-consignment-loss-rajasthan-high-court-scc-times\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/05\/compliance-with-section-16-of-carriage-by-road-act-is-a-pre-condition-for-instituting-suit-for-consignment-loss-rajasthan-high-court-scc-times\/\",\"name\":\"Compliance with Section 16 of Carriage by Road Act is a pre-condition for instituting suit for consignment loss: Rajasthan High Court | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/05\/compliance-with-section-16-of-carriage-by-road-act-is-a-pre-condition-for-instituting-suit-for-consignment-loss-rajasthan-high-court-scc-times\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/05\/compliance-with-section-16-of-carriage-by-road-act-is-a-pre-condition-for-instituting-suit-for-consignment-loss-rajasthan-high-court-scc-times\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-01-05T03:30:01+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-01-10T05:03:07+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\"},\"description\":\"Rajasthan High Court held that compliance with Section 16 of Carriage by Road Act is a pre-condition for instituting suit for consignment loss.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/05\/compliance-with-section-16-of-carriage-by-road-act-is-a-pre-condition-for-instituting-suit-for-consignment-loss-rajasthan-high-court-scc-times\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/05\/compliance-with-section-16-of-carriage-by-road-act-is-a-pre-condition-for-instituting-suit-for-consignment-loss-rajasthan-high-court-scc-times\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/05\/compliance-with-section-16-of-carriage-by-road-act-is-a-pre-condition-for-instituting-suit-for-consignment-loss-rajasthan-high-court-scc-times\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp\",\"width\":887,\"height\":591,\"caption\":\"Rajasthan High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/05\/compliance-with-section-16-of-carriage-by-road-act-is-a-pre-condition-for-instituting-suit-for-consignment-loss-rajasthan-high-court-scc-times\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Compliance with Section 16 of Carriage by Road Act a pre-condition for instituting suit for consignment loss: Rajasthan High Court\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\",\"name\":\"Ritu\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Ritu\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_7\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Compliance with Section 16 of Carriage by Road Act is a pre-condition for instituting suit for consignment loss: Rajasthan High Court | SCC Times","description":"Rajasthan High Court held that compliance with Section 16 of Carriage by Road Act is a pre-condition for instituting suit for consignment loss.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/05\/compliance-with-section-16-of-carriage-by-road-act-is-a-pre-condition-for-instituting-suit-for-consignment-loss-rajasthan-high-court-scc-times\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Compliance with Section 16 of Carriage by Road Act a pre-condition for instituting suit for consignment loss: Rajasthan High Court","og_description":"Rajasthan High Court held that compliance with Section 16 of Carriage by Road Act is a pre-condition for instituting suit for consignment loss.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/05\/compliance-with-section-16-of-carriage-by-road-act-is-a-pre-condition-for-instituting-suit-for-consignment-loss-rajasthan-high-court-scc-times\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2025-01-05T03:30:01+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-01-10T05:03:07+00:00","og_image":[{"width":887,"height":591,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Ritu","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Compliance with Section 16 of Carriage by Road Act a pre-condition for instituting suit for consignment loss: Rajasthan High Court","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Ritu","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/05\/compliance-with-section-16-of-carriage-by-road-act-is-a-pre-condition-for-instituting-suit-for-consignment-loss-rajasthan-high-court-scc-times\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/05\/compliance-with-section-16-of-carriage-by-road-act-is-a-pre-condition-for-instituting-suit-for-consignment-loss-rajasthan-high-court-scc-times\/","name":"Compliance with Section 16 of Carriage by Road Act is a pre-condition for instituting suit for consignment loss: Rajasthan High Court | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/05\/compliance-with-section-16-of-carriage-by-road-act-is-a-pre-condition-for-instituting-suit-for-consignment-loss-rajasthan-high-court-scc-times\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/05\/compliance-with-section-16-of-carriage-by-road-act-is-a-pre-condition-for-instituting-suit-for-consignment-loss-rajasthan-high-court-scc-times\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp","datePublished":"2025-01-05T03:30:01+00:00","dateModified":"2025-01-10T05:03:07+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9"},"description":"Rajasthan High Court held that compliance with Section 16 of Carriage by Road Act is a pre-condition for instituting suit for consignment loss.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/05\/compliance-with-section-16-of-carriage-by-road-act-is-a-pre-condition-for-instituting-suit-for-consignment-loss-rajasthan-high-court-scc-times\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/05\/compliance-with-section-16-of-carriage-by-road-act-is-a-pre-condition-for-instituting-suit-for-consignment-loss-rajasthan-high-court-scc-times\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/05\/compliance-with-section-16-of-carriage-by-road-act-is-a-pre-condition-for-instituting-suit-for-consignment-loss-rajasthan-high-court-scc-times\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp","width":887,"height":591,"caption":"Rajasthan High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/05\/compliance-with-section-16-of-carriage-by-road-act-is-a-pre-condition-for-instituting-suit-for-consignment-loss-rajasthan-high-court-scc-times\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Compliance with Section 16 of Carriage by Road Act a pre-condition for instituting suit for consignment loss: Rajasthan High Court"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9","name":"Ritu","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Ritu"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_7\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":225347,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/10\/mad-hc-non-service-of-copies-of-plaint-is-not-a-ground-for-converting-a-summary-suit-filed-under-or-37-cpc-into-a-regular-suit\/","url_meta":{"origin":338438,"position":0},"title":"Mad HC | Non-service of copies of plaint is not a ground for converting a summary suit filed under Or. 37 CPC into a regular suit","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"February 10, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Madras High Court:\u00a0V. Bharathidasan, J., dismissed a revision petition filed against the order of the trial court whereby the application filed by the petitioner-defendant to convert the original summary suit filed by the respondent-plaintiff under Order 37 CPC into a regular suit was dismissed. The respondent had filed a suit\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":313386,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/08\/notice-under-s-326-of-u-p-municipalities-act-not-mandatory-if-defeats-the-purpose-of-injunction-suit-allahabad-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":338438,"position":1},"title":"Suit not barred for want of Notice under S. 326 of U.P. Municipalities Act if it defeats the purpose of Injunction suit; Allahabad HC upholds Civil Judge order","author":"Apoorva","date":"February 8, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cWhether the suit is barred by any law must be determined from the statements in the plaint and it is not open to decide the issue on the basis of any other material including the written statement in the case.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"allahabad high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":267027,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/18\/application-under-s-151-of-cpc-maintainable-despite-the-fact-that-order-allowing-the-application-under-or-7-r-11-of-cpc-is-appealable\/","url_meta":{"origin":338438,"position":2},"title":"MP HC | Application under S. 151 of CPC maintainable despite the fact that order allowing the application under Or. 7 R. 11 of CPC is appealable; Trial Court directed to restore civil suit","author":"Editor","date":"May 18, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Madhya Pradesh High Court: Dwarka Dhish Bansal, J. allowed a civil revision under Section 115 of CPC against the order rejecting application filed under Section 151 of CPC holding that the same was not maintainable. Order sheet of the trial Court showed that respondent 2 was not present when the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":342620,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/01\/s-85-of-waqf-act-waqf-tribunal-has-exclusive-jurisdiction-over-disputes-once-property-qualifies-as-waqf-by-user-raj-hc-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":338438,"position":3},"title":"S. 85 of Waqf Act | Waqf Tribunal has exclusive jurisdiction over disputes once a property qualifies as \u2018Waqf by user\u2019: Rajasthan High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"March 1, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cIt is not disputed that Masjid is a place used for religious purpose for praying Namaz etc., therefore, it comes within the definition of \u2018Waqf\u2019.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Rajasthan High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":218167,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/17\/del-hc-discrepancy-of-not-filing-leave-to-defend-under-or-37-r-35-in-response-to-summary-suit-could-be-ignored-in-interest-of-justice\/","url_meta":{"origin":338438,"position":4},"title":"Del HC | Discrepancy of not filing “leave to defend” under Or. 37 R. 3(5) in response to summary suit could be ignored in interest of justice","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 17, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High court:\u00a0Vibhu Bhkaru, J. dismissed a revision petition filed under Section 115 CPC impugning an order passed by the Additional District Judge in the subject summary suit whereby the respondents were granted unconditional Leave to Defend. The respondents had defaulted in repaying the loan extended to them by the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":315600,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/29\/civil-court-jurisdiction-barred-by-section-85-of-waqf-act-cal-hc-allows-application-under-order-vii-rule-11d-cpc-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":338438,"position":5},"title":"Civil Court lacks jurisdiction over Waqf Property disputes: Calcutta High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"February 29, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court held that \u201cin order to decide whether the suit is barred by any law, it is the statement in the plaint which will have to be construed.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Calcutta High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/338438","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67514"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=338438"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/338438\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/314824"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=338438"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=338438"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=338438"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}