{"id":337825,"date":"2024-12-24T09:00:00","date_gmt":"2024-12-24T03:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=337825"},"modified":"2024-12-26T11:01:44","modified_gmt":"2024-12-26T05:31:44","slug":"no-bar-on-public-trust-to-file-application-under-order-i-rule-10-cpc-for-impleadment-as-necessary-party-in-appeal-rajasthan-high-court-scc-times","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/12\/24\/no-bar-on-public-trust-to-file-application-under-order-i-rule-10-cpc-for-impleadment-as-necessary-party-in-appeal-rajasthan-high-court-scc-times\/","title":{"rendered":"No bar on Public Trust to file application under Order I Rule 10 CPC for impleadment as necessary party in appeal: Rajasthan High Court"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Rajasthan High Court:<\/span> In a civil writ petition challenging the Commissioner’s order which rejected the petitioner’s application under Order I Rule 10<\/a> of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908<\/a> (CPC) to implead the Public Trust as a party to the appeal, a single-judge bench of Nupur Bhati, J., set aside the Commissioner’s order and directed the impleadment of the Public Trust in the appeal pending before the Commissioner.<\/p>\n

Factual Matrix<\/h3>\n

In the instant matter, the petitioner filed an application before Assistant Commissioner, Devasthan Department, Jaipur, seeking approval for registration of the “Shri Khetpal Bavji (Jai Bherunath) Trust” under the Rajasthan Public Trust Act, 1950 (the Act). The application for registration of Trust was approved on 29-12-2023.<\/p>\n

Aggrieved by the impugned approval, respondents 3 and 4 filed an appeal under Section 20 of the Act before the Commissioner, Devasthan Department, Udaipur, challenging the Assistant Commissioner’s decision.<\/p>\n

The petitioner, acting as the Management Trustee of the Public Trust, filed an application under Order I Rule 10<\/a> of the CPC<\/a> seeking impleadment of the Public Trust as a party to the appeal. This application was rejected by the Commissioner on 11-11-2024, on the grounds that the Public Trust was not fully registered under the Act.<\/p>\n

The petitioner challenged the Commissioner’s order dated 11-11-2024 before this Court, seeking relief to quash the impugned order and allow the impleadment of the Public Trust as a party in the pending appeal.<\/p>\n

Moot Point<\/h3>\n
    \n
  1. \n

    Whether the Public Trust, despite incomplete procedural formalities under Section 21 of the Act, is a necessary and proper party to the appeal?<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  2. \n

    Whether the rejection of the application for impleadment under Order I Rule 10<\/a> CPC<\/a> was legally justified?<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    Parties’ Contentions<\/h3>\n

    The petitioner submitted that the Trust, being a juristic entity post-registration under Section 19 of the Act, must be impleaded for proper adjudication. It was contended that the relief sought by the respondents directly affects the Public Trust’s rights and interests. The petitioner placed reliance on Sudhir G. Angur<\/span> v. M. Sanjeev<\/span>, (2006) 1 SCC 141<\/a> and asserted that a necessary party’s exclusion prejudices fair adjudication. It was stated that Sections 19 and 21 of the Act operate in sequence, with Section 21 being procedural. It was contended that absence of entries in the Register under Section 21 does not invalidate the Trust’s registration under Section 19.<\/p>\n

    However, the respondents’ contended that since the entries under Section 21 of the Act were not made, therefore, the Trust cannot be treated as registered under the Act. The respondents’ cited Section 29 of the Act and argued that the bar against suits by unregistered Trusts extends to impleadment. It was contended that the petitioner, in his individual capacity as Trustee, is already a party to the appeal, rendering additional impleadment unnecessary.<\/p>\n

    Court’s Analysis<\/h3>\n

    The Court noted that Section 19 of the Act grants the Trust juristic status, while Section 21 merely formalises its procedural registration. The Court asserted that the registration under Section 19 grants the Trust a juristic identity, irrespective of pending entries under Section 21. The Court noted that the bar under Section 29 of the Act applies only to suits enforcing a Trust’s rights, not to impleadment in appeals challenging its registration.<\/p>\n

    The Court stated that in the present case the Trust is the entity whose registration is under direct challenge, therefore excluding the Trust would lead to improper representation and potential prejudice. The Court noted that “the petitioner has been made a party in his personal capacity and not in the capacity of the Management Trustee of the Public Trust and if the Public Trust is not impleaded as party respondent in the appeal, then the Public Trust would go unrepresented before the Appellate Authority, i.e. the Commissioner, and in case the appeal filed by the respondents is allowed, the rights of the Public Trust would be seriously prejudiced.”<\/span><\/p>\n

    The Court further stated that Order I Rule 10<\/a> of the CPC<\/a> empowers Courts to add necessary parties to ensure comprehensive adjudication and held that the Trust qualifies as such a party.<\/p>\n

    Court’s Decision<\/h3>\n

    The Court set aside the Commissioner’s order dated 11-11-2024 which rejected the petitioner’s impleadment application and directed that the Public Trust is to be impleaded as a party in the pending appeal. The Court disposed of the writ petition and all pending applications, if any.<\/p>\n

    [Ambalal Dhakad<\/span> v. Asst. Commissioner, Devasthan Department, Jaipur<\/span>, 2024 SCC OnLine Raj 3434<\/a>, Decided on 09-12-2024<\/span>]<\/p>\n\n

    Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n

    Mr. Avin Chhangani, Counsel for the Petitioner<\/span><\/p>\n

    Mr. Deelip Kawadia, Counsel for the Respondents<\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

    Section 29 bars suits or proceedings to enforce the rights of unregistered trusts but does not preclude impleadment in appeals concerning the registration itself.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67514,"featured_media":314824,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[76792,25874,45139,66793,59974,76790,44707,75685,2575,76793,76791],"class_list":["post-337825","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-bar-against-suits-by-unregistered-trust","tag-impleadment","tag-juristic-entity","tag-justice-nupur-bhati","tag-necessary-party","tag-order-i-rule-10-cpc","tag-public-trust","tag-quashment-of-order","tag-Rajasthan_High_Court","tag-rajasthan-public-trust-act","tag-registration-of-trust"],"yoast_head":"\nNo bar on Public Trust to file application under Order I Rule 10 CPC for impleadment as necessary party in appeal: Rajasthan High Court | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Rajasthan High Court held that there is no bar on the Public Trust to file application under Order I Rule 10 CPC for impleadment as necessary party in appeal.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/12\/24\/no-bar-on-public-trust-to-file-application-under-order-i-rule-10-cpc-for-impleadment-as-necessary-party-in-appeal-rajasthan-high-court-scc-times\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"No bar on Public Trust to file application under Order I Rule 10 CPC for impleadment as necessary party in appeal: Rajasthan High Court\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Rajasthan High Court held that there is no bar on the Public Trust to file application under Order I Rule 10 CPC for impleadment as necessary party in appeal.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/12\/24\/no-bar-on-public-trust-to-file-application-under-order-i-rule-10-cpc-for-impleadment-as-necessary-party-in-appeal-rajasthan-high-court-scc-times\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-12-24T03:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-12-26T05:31:44+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"591\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"No bar on Public Trust to file application under Order I Rule 10 CPC for impleadment as necessary party in appeal: Rajasthan High Court\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/12\/24\/no-bar-on-public-trust-to-file-application-under-order-i-rule-10-cpc-for-impleadment-as-necessary-party-in-appeal-rajasthan-high-court-scc-times\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/12\/24\/no-bar-on-public-trust-to-file-application-under-order-i-rule-10-cpc-for-impleadment-as-necessary-party-in-appeal-rajasthan-high-court-scc-times\/\",\"name\":\"No bar on Public Trust to file application under Order I Rule 10 CPC for impleadment as necessary party in appeal: Rajasthan High Court | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/12\/24\/no-bar-on-public-trust-to-file-application-under-order-i-rule-10-cpc-for-impleadment-as-necessary-party-in-appeal-rajasthan-high-court-scc-times\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/12\/24\/no-bar-on-public-trust-to-file-application-under-order-i-rule-10-cpc-for-impleadment-as-necessary-party-in-appeal-rajasthan-high-court-scc-times\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-12-24T03:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-12-26T05:31:44+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\"},\"description\":\"Rajasthan High Court held that there is no bar on the Public Trust to file application under Order I Rule 10 CPC for impleadment as necessary party in appeal.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/12\/24\/no-bar-on-public-trust-to-file-application-under-order-i-rule-10-cpc-for-impleadment-as-necessary-party-in-appeal-rajasthan-high-court-scc-times\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/12\/24\/no-bar-on-public-trust-to-file-application-under-order-i-rule-10-cpc-for-impleadment-as-necessary-party-in-appeal-rajasthan-high-court-scc-times\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/12\/24\/no-bar-on-public-trust-to-file-application-under-order-i-rule-10-cpc-for-impleadment-as-necessary-party-in-appeal-rajasthan-high-court-scc-times\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp\",\"width\":887,\"height\":591,\"caption\":\"Rajasthan High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/12\/24\/no-bar-on-public-trust-to-file-application-under-order-i-rule-10-cpc-for-impleadment-as-necessary-party-in-appeal-rajasthan-high-court-scc-times\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"No bar on Public Trust to file application under Order I Rule 10 CPC for impleadment as necessary party in appeal: Rajasthan High Court\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\",\"name\":\"Ritu\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Ritu\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_7\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"No bar on Public Trust to file application under Order I Rule 10 CPC for impleadment as necessary party in appeal: Rajasthan High Court | SCC Times","description":"Rajasthan High Court held that there is no bar on the Public Trust to file application under Order I Rule 10 CPC for impleadment as necessary party in appeal.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/12\/24\/no-bar-on-public-trust-to-file-application-under-order-i-rule-10-cpc-for-impleadment-as-necessary-party-in-appeal-rajasthan-high-court-scc-times\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"No bar on Public Trust to file application under Order I Rule 10 CPC for impleadment as necessary party in appeal: Rajasthan High Court","og_description":"Rajasthan High Court held that there is no bar on the Public Trust to file application under Order I Rule 10 CPC for impleadment as necessary party in appeal.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/12\/24\/no-bar-on-public-trust-to-file-application-under-order-i-rule-10-cpc-for-impleadment-as-necessary-party-in-appeal-rajasthan-high-court-scc-times\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2024-12-24T03:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-12-26T05:31:44+00:00","og_image":[{"width":887,"height":591,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Ritu","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"No bar on Public Trust to file application under Order I Rule 10 CPC for impleadment as necessary party in appeal: Rajasthan High Court","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Ritu","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/12\/24\/no-bar-on-public-trust-to-file-application-under-order-i-rule-10-cpc-for-impleadment-as-necessary-party-in-appeal-rajasthan-high-court-scc-times\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/12\/24\/no-bar-on-public-trust-to-file-application-under-order-i-rule-10-cpc-for-impleadment-as-necessary-party-in-appeal-rajasthan-high-court-scc-times\/","name":"No bar on Public Trust to file application under Order I Rule 10 CPC for impleadment as necessary party in appeal: Rajasthan High Court | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/12\/24\/no-bar-on-public-trust-to-file-application-under-order-i-rule-10-cpc-for-impleadment-as-necessary-party-in-appeal-rajasthan-high-court-scc-times\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/12\/24\/no-bar-on-public-trust-to-file-application-under-order-i-rule-10-cpc-for-impleadment-as-necessary-party-in-appeal-rajasthan-high-court-scc-times\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp","datePublished":"2024-12-24T03:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2024-12-26T05:31:44+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9"},"description":"Rajasthan High Court held that there is no bar on the Public Trust to file application under Order I Rule 10 CPC for impleadment as necessary party in appeal.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/12\/24\/no-bar-on-public-trust-to-file-application-under-order-i-rule-10-cpc-for-impleadment-as-necessary-party-in-appeal-rajasthan-high-court-scc-times\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/12\/24\/no-bar-on-public-trust-to-file-application-under-order-i-rule-10-cpc-for-impleadment-as-necessary-party-in-appeal-rajasthan-high-court-scc-times\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/12\/24\/no-bar-on-public-trust-to-file-application-under-order-i-rule-10-cpc-for-impleadment-as-necessary-party-in-appeal-rajasthan-high-court-scc-times\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp","width":887,"height":591,"caption":"Rajasthan High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/12\/24\/no-bar-on-public-trust-to-file-application-under-order-i-rule-10-cpc-for-impleadment-as-necessary-party-in-appeal-rajasthan-high-court-scc-times\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"No bar on Public Trust to file application under Order I Rule 10 CPC for impleadment as necessary party in appeal: Rajasthan High Court"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9","name":"Ritu","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Ritu"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_7\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":340333,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/03\/transferee-pendente-lite-impleadment-right-to-appeal-sc-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":337825,"position":0},"title":"Transferee pendente lite not entitled to come on record as a matter of right; impleadment will depend on nature of suit: SC","author":"Sucheta","date":"February 3, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cMerely because such transferee pendente lite does not come on record, the concept of him (transferee pendente lite) not being bound by the judgment does not arise and consequently he would be bound by the result of the litigation, though he remains unrepresented\u201d.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"transferee pendente lite","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/transferee-pendente-lite.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/transferee-pendente-lite.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/transferee-pendente-lite.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/transferee-pendente-lite.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":310171,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/26\/madhya-pradesh-high-court-upholds-registered-proprietors-independent-rights-in-scotch-whisky-gi-case-scc-blog\/","url_meta":{"origin":337825,"position":1},"title":"Madhya Pradesh High Court upholds registered Proprietor’s independent rights in Scotch Whisky GI Case; Rejects impleadment order under GI Act","author":"Ritu","date":"December 26, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The legislative intent of the Geographical Indications of Goods (Registration and Protection) Act, 1999 is to protect registered GIs, and Section 21 is enacted to safeguard the rights arising from registration.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madhya Pradesh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/madhya-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/madhya-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/madhya-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/madhya-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":337309,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/12\/16\/sc-upholds-right-to-restore-appeal-challenging-compromise-decree\/","url_meta":{"origin":337825,"position":2},"title":"\u2018As a matter of public policy, Courts must not curtail statutory remedies\u2019; SC upholds right to restore appeal challenging compromise decree","author":"Editor","date":"December 16, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cOnly the Court that entertains the petition of compromise can determine its legality, at the time of recording the compromise or when it is questioned by way of a recall application. No other remedy is available to the party who is aggrieved by the compromise decree as an appeal and\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"challenge Compromise decree","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/sc-193.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/sc-193.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/sc-193.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/sc-193.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":367063,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/18\/raj-hc-establishment-of-dharmshala-on-private-land-cannot-be-deemed-a-charitable-purchases\/","url_meta":{"origin":337825,"position":3},"title":"Establishment of Dharmshala on private land cannot be deemed a charitable purchase: Rajasthan High Court","author":"Editor","date":"November 18, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cA bare perusal of the Patta reflects that the land in question was sold out for Rs.312 to Baijnath and Sargarmal in the year 1916. The said Patta nowhere reflects that the land was sold out at a concessional rate. Further, there is no stipulation in the said Patta regarding\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Dharmshala on private land not charitable","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Dharmshala-on-private-land-not-charitable.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Dharmshala-on-private-land-not-charitable.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Dharmshala-on-private-land-not-charitable.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Dharmshala-on-private-land-not-charitable.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":203281,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/08\/transferee-can-be-impleaded-in-a-suit-pendente-lite-only-if-they-have-a-substantial-interest-involved\/","url_meta":{"origin":337825,"position":4},"title":"Transferee can be impleaded in a suit pendente lite only if they have a substantial interest involved","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 8, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Jharkhand High Court: A Single Judge Bench of Shree Chandrashekhar, J., dismissed a writ petition filed against the order of the trial court whereby her application for impleadment as a party, under Order 1 Rule 10(2), CPC was rejected. The main issue that arose before the Court was whether a\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":173654,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/12\/06\/mere-fact-no-relief-sought-party-seeking-impleadment-view-substantial-interest-suit-property-not-sufficient-non-suit\/","url_meta":{"origin":337825,"position":5},"title":"Mere fact that no relief has been sought against a party seeking impleadment, in view of his substantial interest in suit property, is not sufficient to non-suit him","author":"Saba","date":"December 6, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi: A Single Bench Judge comprising of Chandrashekhar, J. addressed a petition on a title suit wherein the petitioner had initially filed a suit for declaration of his right, title and interest over the land in question and a decree of confirmation of his possession\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/337825","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67514"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=337825"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/337825\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/314824"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=337825"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=337825"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=337825"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}