{"id":337710,"date":"2024-12-21T13:30:00","date_gmt":"2024-12-21T08:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=337710"},"modified":"2024-12-26T10:31:59","modified_gmt":"2024-12-26T05:01:59","slug":"sc-upheld-allahabad-hc-decision-making-dnd-flyway-toll-free","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/12\/21\/sc-upheld-allahabad-hc-decision-making-dnd-flyway-toll-free\/","title":{"rendered":"\u2018Public defrauded under the guise of necessary public infrastructure\u2019; SC upholds Allahabad HC\u2019s decision making DND flyway toll-free"},"content":{"rendered":"<style>\n.animate-charcter{background-image: linear-gradient(-225deg, #231557 0%, #44107a 29%, #ff1361 67%, #fff800 100%); background-size: 200% auto; -webkit-background-clip: text; -webkit-text-fill-color: transparent; animation: textclip 0s linear infinite;}\n@keyframes textclip {to {background-position: 200% center;}}\n<\/style>\n<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Supreme Court:<\/span> In a civil appeal by NOIDA Toll Bridge Company Limited (&#8216;NTBCL&#8217;) against a decision of Allahabad High Court concerning a challenge to the collection and levying of toll on Delhi-Noida Direct Flyway (DND) wherein the agreement between NTBCL, the New Okhla Industrial Development Authority (NOIDA) and the Infrastructure Leasing and Financial Services Limited (IL&amp;FS) was held to be bad in law and directed NTBCL to cease the imposition of toll upon commuters using the DND Flyway, the Division Bench of <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Surya Kant*<\/span> and Ujjal Bhuyan, JJ. upheld the High Court&#8217;s decision. The Court held that NTBCL has recovered the project costs and substantial profits, hence, the continued imposition or collection of user fees or tolls was eliminated.<\/p>\n<p class=\"animate-charcter\" style=\"margin-left: 36pt; margin-bottom: 3%; text-align: center; font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;\">&#8220;NOIDA did not have any competence to delegate the power to levy fees and toll to NTBCL, and thereby overstepped its statutory bounds.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court also upheld the High Court&#8217;s view on the reasonableness of the formula adopted in the concession agreement, that it was opposed to public policy, unjust, arbitrary and liable to be severed from the concession agreement.<\/p>\n<h3>Background<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">NOIDA and the Delhi Administration entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with IL&amp;FS on 07-04-1992, intending to construct the DND Flyway. In pursuance of the MoU, a Committee comprising representatives of the Government of India, the Government of NCT of Delhi, the State of UP and IL&amp;FS was constituted to take important decisions relating to the Project and its implementation (Steering Committee). The Steering Committee approved the incorporation of NTBCL by IL&amp;FS in accordance with the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9000055985\" target=\"_blank\">Companies Act, 1956<\/a>, which was contemplated to operate as a Special Purpose Vehicle for developing the DND Flyway on a Build, Operate, Own and Transfer (BOOT) basis. The NTBCL would recover its investment in developing the DND Flyway infrastructural facility by imposing a toll on the commuters availing of such services.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Concession Agreement executed on 12-11-1997, designated NOIDA and IL&amp;FS as the &#8216;Sponsors&#8217; and NTBCL as the &#8216;Concessionaire&#8217;. The Project was thereafter initiated and completed, with the DND Flyway being opened for public use on 06-02-2001 (&#8216;commissioning date&#8217;).<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Federation of NOIDA Residents Welfare Association (&#8216;respondent-association&#8217;) approached the High Court seeking a direction to discontinue toll charges to the users of the DND Flyway. The High Court, vide the impugned judgment, while considering the constitutional validity of the Concession Agreement, primarily held that: (i) Article 13 of the Concession Agreement, which governed the determination, collection, and appropriation of user fees by NTBCL, was invalid in law; (ii) Article 14 thereof, which outlined the calculation of the Total Project Cost, Returns, and their recovery by NTBCL, was to be severed from the Concession Agreement; and (iii) NTBCL was prohibited from continuing to impose or collect use fee\/ toll. The High Court further held that the selection process of NTBCL for the Project violated Article <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001574870\" target=\"_blank\">14<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\" target=\"_blank\">Constitution<\/a>.<\/p>\n<h3>Analysis and Decision<\/h3>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Maintainability of the Writ Petition before the High Court and validity of awarding the contract to NTBCL<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Regarding the <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">locus standi<\/span> of the respondent-association, the Court reiterated that while public interest litigation serves as an effective tool for addressing the grievances of the public, it must be carefully scrutinised to prevent misuse or abuse by those with ulterior motives. In the matter at hand, the respondent-association is a Society duly registered under the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002919602\" target=\"_blank\">Societies Registration Act, 1860<\/a>, with the primary objective of promoting the welfare of NOIDA residents. The society acts as a bridge between the residents and public authorities, catering to the former&#8217;s needs for essential civic amenities. Hence, it is clear that respondent-association approached the High Court in good faith, to safeguard the interests of NOIDA residents, who had been subjected to the levy of toll at the DND Flyway under the guise of user fees by NTBCL. Regarding the submission of delay and laches, the Court pointed out that writ proceedings under Articles 32 or 226 are not guided by the provisions of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726959\" target=\"_blank\">Limitation Act, 1963<\/a>, but instead, by the doctrine of Delay and Laches and the doctrine cannot be applied <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">stricto senso<\/span> to writ petitions invoking public interest jurisdiction, unless the Court is satisfied that the party has not approached it with clean hands. The Court upheld the High Court&#8217;s view that the plea of delay lacked substance, as the commuters, including respondent-authority, were justified in trusting that NOIDA would protect their interests.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Discussing the scope of judicial intervention by the High Court in a commercial contract (concession agreement), the Court pointed out that the issue of whether such commercial contracts, which may stem from a Government Policy decision or where one of the parties is the State or its instrumentalities, are entirely insulated from judicial review is no longer <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">res integra<\/span> and there is no absolute bar on the maintainability of writ petitions, even in matters concerning contracts or monetary claims and in such cases the discretion lies with the Court. The Court stated that &#8220;where State action is challenged as arbitrary or capricious, the Courts are justified in intervening through judicial review to determine whether the State has adhered to the principles embodied in Article <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001574870\" target=\"_blank\">14<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\" target=\"_blank\">Constitution India<\/a>. Therefore, the Court held that considering that the Concession Agreement involved not only entities like IL&amp;FS and NTBCL but also a Public Authority such as NOIDA, it was evident that the concession agreement, though commercial in nature, was subject to judicial scrutiny. <span style=\"font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;\">The Project, having been developed for public benefit, cannot escape judicial oversight, particularly when the allegations pertain to the public&#8217;s rights and interests, which are being infringed upon by the levying of user fees.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">With regard to the validity of awarding the contract to NTBCL, the Court upheld the High Court&#8217;s view holding that the selection of NTBCL without following proper procedure and without giving any opportunity to bid, to other competitors, was nothing but an opaque device resorted to, in contravention of Article <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001574870\" target=\"_blank\">14<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\" target=\"_blank\">Constitution of India<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Delegation of power to levy fees and its validity<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court perused Section 13.1 of the concession agreement which deals with the &#8216;Collection of Fee&#8217; and grants NTBCL the right to collect, retain, and appropriate fees from users of the DND Flyway starting from the commissioning date. The Court noted that Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9000533853\" target=\"_blank\">6<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9000534136\" target=\"_blank\">Uttar Pradesh Industrial Area Development Act, 1976<\/a> (1976 Act) outlines the &#8216;functions of the authority&#8217;, and this &#8216;authority&#8217; means the corporate body constituted by the State of Uttar Pradesh. Section 11 of the 1976 Act provides that the Authority may levy taxes to provide, maintain, or continue amenities within the industrial development area, subject to the approval of the State Government.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Further, the Court noted that Section 6A of the 1976 Act was inserted vide the Uttar Pradesh Act No. 2 of 1999, with effect from 14-08-1998, which laid down that the <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">&#8216;authority may by agreement authorise any person to provide or maintain or continue to provide or maintain any infrastructure or amenities, and to collect taxes or fees, as the case may be, levied thereof&#8217;<\/span>. In furtherance of the power conferred under Section 6A, read with Section 19(2)(e) of the 1976 Act, NOIDA framed the NOIDA (Levy of Infrastructure Fee) Regulations, 1998, which came into force in September 1998, which empowered NOIDA to authorise the designated developer to levy and collect the applicable fee, which would in turn, be based on a mutually agreed formula between the parties. In the matter at hand, the &#8216;designated developer&#8217; would be NTBCL.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">However, the Court pointed out that <span style=\"font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;\">in complete contradiction and violation of the scheme of the 1976 Act, NOIDA in purported exercise of its power to formulate Regulations not only delegated the power to collect fee but also authorised NTBCL to revise and levy such charges.<\/span> The Court stated that <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">under our Constitutional framework, no private entity can be granted the authority to levy taxes or fees, for such powers are exclusively vested in public authorities. The collection of fees or toll can be assigned to a developer or contractor for a defined period, including for the purpose of recovery of the investment made in developing the infrastructure.<\/span> Thus, the Court concurred with the High Court&#8217;s conclusion that the concession agreement, in so far as it sub-delegates the power to levy and collect fees to NTBCL, was unlawful, and the Regulations justifying such sub-delegation undermined the objective of Section 6A of the 1976 Act. 51. The Court added that NTBCL and NOIDA indulged in trickery and placed the cart before the horse, in attempting to authorise actions post facto, thereby obscuring the full extent of misuse of power.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Regarding the reasonableness of the formula, the Court opined that <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">the method used to calculate the total project cost was fundamentally a mechanism for unjust enrichment by a select few<\/span> and, as such was rightly deemed to be inherently arbitrary by the High Court. Accordingly, the formula outlined in concession agreement was unreasonable and contravened Article <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001574870\" target=\"_blank\">14<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\" target=\"_blank\">Constitution<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Perpetuity of the Concession Agreement<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court noted that Section 2.3 of the concession agreement establishes a concession period of either 30 years from the effective date or until NTBCL recovers the total project cost and returns, based on determinations made by the independent engineer and auditor per Article 14 of the concession agreement. Should recovery not be achieved within 30 years, Section 2.4 provides for two-year extensions, repeating as necessary, until full recovery is realized.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court pointed out that as NTBCL is a subsidiary of IL&amp;FS, this arrangement positioned NOIDA as a minority member without meaningful authority in the appointments, thus, IL&amp;FS and NTBCL effectively controlled the selection, which casts serious doubts on the transparency and so-called independence of these appointments. Perusing CAG&#8217;s Report, the Court noted that if NTBCL continues to operate under the current terms of the concession agreement, with extensions as per its provisions, the unrecovered total project cost could rise to around Rupees 7,200 crores by 31-03-2020 and Rupees 15,200 crores by 31-03-2029. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">The Court said that this unending escalation in the total project cost reflected that the concession agreement was cleverly designed to remain perpetually operational.<\/span> The Court also noted that the annual toll income of NTBCL during 2001-2016 was Rupees 892.51 crores.<\/p>\n<p class=\"animate-charcter\" style=\"margin-left: 36pt; margin-bottom: 3%; text-align: center; font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;\">&#8220;An exhaustive reading of the CAG Report highlights the extent to which the public has been defrauded. The general public has been forced to part with hundreds of crores by IL&amp;FS and NTBCL, under the guise of providing necessary public infrastructure. This could not have been done but for the collusion of the then officers of the two State Governments and of NOIDA, who closed their eyes while the contractual obligations were incurred.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court stated that NTBCL has been making profits for the last 11 years; has no accumulated losses as of 31-03-2016; has paid dividends of Rupees 243.07 crores till 31-03-2016 to its shareholders; and repaid all its debt with interest. Hence, the Court held that by 31-03-2016, NTBCL recovered the project costs, the maintenance costs, and a significant profit on its initial investment. There is no rhyme or reason for the collection of user fees\/tolls to continue.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">NOIDA Toll Bridge Company Ltd. v. Federation of NOIDA Residents Welfare Association, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/6fyb8l38\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2024 SCC OnLine SC 3831<\/a>, decided on: 20-12-2024<\/span>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000080;\">*Judgment Authored by: Justice Surya Kant<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Constitution of India &nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product\/the-constitution-of-india-coat-pocket-edition?products_id=100647\" target=\"_blank\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product\/the-constitution-of-india-coat-pocket-edition?products_id=100647\" target=\"_blank\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/s3.amazonaws.com\/ebcwebstore\/images\/the-constitution-of-india-coat-pocket-edition-Gopal-Sankaranarayanan-ebc-front-cover.JPG\" alt=\"Constitution of India\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294438\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">&#8220;NOIDA (Levy of Infrastructure Fee) Regulations, 1998 came to be enacted only after the Concession Agreement had been executed and were seemingly designed to validate the actions already taken by NTBCL and NOIDA.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67517,"featured_media":337713,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,9],"tags":[50790,76703,76702,35299,37644,76701,76706,44635,5363,76705,76704],"class_list":["post-337710","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-supremecourt","tag-allahabad-hc","tag-dnd-flyway","tag-federation-of-noida-rwa","tag-justice-surya-kant","tag-justice-ujjal-bhuyan","tag-noida-toll-bridge-company","tag-ntbcl","tag-sc","tag-supreme-court","tag-toll-collection","tag-toll-free"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.4 (Yoast SEO v27.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>SC upholds Allahabad HC&#039;s decision making DND flyway toll-free | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"&#039;Public defrauded under guise of necessary public infrastructure&#039;; SC upheld Allahabad HC&#039;s decision making DND flyway toll-free\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/12\/21\/sc-upheld-allahabad-hc-decision-making-dnd-flyway-toll-free\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"\u2018Public defrauded under the guise of necessary public infrastructure\u2019; SC upholds Allahabad HC\u2019s decision making DND flyway toll-free\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"&#039;Public defrauded under guise of necessary public infrastructure&#039;; SC upheld Allahabad HC&#039;s decision making DND flyway toll-free\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/12\/21\/sc-upheld-allahabad-hc-decision-making-dnd-flyway-toll-free\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-12-21T08:00:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-12-26T05:01:59+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/DND-flyway-toll-free.jpeg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"\u2018Public defrauded under the guise of necessary public infrastructure\u2019; SC upholds Allahabad HC\u2019s decision making DND flyway toll-free\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"9 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/12\\\/21\\\/sc-upheld-allahabad-hc-decision-making-dnd-flyway-toll-free\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/12\\\/21\\\/sc-upheld-allahabad-hc-decision-making-dnd-flyway-toll-free\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Editor\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/84913f82186a8dea042dc300d5751624\"},\"headline\":\"\u2018Public defrauded under the guise of necessary public infrastructure\u2019; SC upholds Allahabad HC\u2019s decision making DND flyway toll-free\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-12-21T08:00:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-12-26T05:01:59+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/12\\\/21\\\/sc-upheld-allahabad-hc-decision-making-dnd-flyway-toll-free\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":1900,\"commentCount\":1,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/12\\\/21\\\/sc-upheld-allahabad-hc-decision-making-dnd-flyway-toll-free\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/12\\\/DND-flyway-toll-free.webp\",\"keywords\":[\"Allahabad HC\",\"DND Flyway\",\"Federation of Noida RWA\",\"Justice Surya Kant\",\"Justice Ujjal Bhuyan\",\"Noida Toll Bridge Company\",\"NTBCL\",\"SC\",\"Supreme Court\",\"toll collection\",\"toll-free\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Case Briefs\",\"Supreme Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/12\\\/21\\\/sc-upheld-allahabad-hc-decision-making-dnd-flyway-toll-free\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/12\\\/21\\\/sc-upheld-allahabad-hc-decision-making-dnd-flyway-toll-free\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/12\\\/21\\\/sc-upheld-allahabad-hc-decision-making-dnd-flyway-toll-free\\\/\",\"name\":\"SC upholds Allahabad HC's decision making DND flyway toll-free | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/12\\\/21\\\/sc-upheld-allahabad-hc-decision-making-dnd-flyway-toll-free\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/12\\\/21\\\/sc-upheld-allahabad-hc-decision-making-dnd-flyway-toll-free\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/12\\\/DND-flyway-toll-free.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-12-21T08:00:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-12-26T05:01:59+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/84913f82186a8dea042dc300d5751624\"},\"description\":\"'Public defrauded under guise of necessary public infrastructure'; SC upheld Allahabad HC's decision making DND flyway toll-free\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/12\\\/21\\\/sc-upheld-allahabad-hc-decision-making-dnd-flyway-toll-free\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/12\\\/21\\\/sc-upheld-allahabad-hc-decision-making-dnd-flyway-toll-free\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/12\\\/21\\\/sc-upheld-allahabad-hc-decision-making-dnd-flyway-toll-free\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/12\\\/DND-flyway-toll-free.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/12\\\/DND-flyway-toll-free.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"\u2018Public defrauded under the guise of necessary public infrastructure\u2019; SC upholds Allahabad HC\u2019s decision making DND flyway toll-free\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/12\\\/21\\\/sc-upheld-allahabad-hc-decision-making-dnd-flyway-toll-free\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"\u2018Public defrauded under the guise of necessary public infrastructure\u2019; SC upholds Allahabad HC\u2019s decision making DND flyway toll-free\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/84913f82186a8dea042dc300d5751624\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/d822f35f9fcd11386aa47345cde7945e45a64da7205eebe9784f21d0cd223603?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/d822f35f9fcd11386aa47345cde7945e45a64da7205eebe9784f21d0cd223603?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/d822f35f9fcd11386aa47345cde7945e45a64da7205eebe9784f21d0cd223603?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/author\\\/scc-online-editor\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"SC upholds Allahabad HC's decision making DND flyway toll-free | SCC Times","description":"'Public defrauded under guise of necessary public infrastructure'; SC upheld Allahabad HC's decision making DND flyway toll-free","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/12\/21\/sc-upheld-allahabad-hc-decision-making-dnd-flyway-toll-free\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"\u2018Public defrauded under the guise of necessary public infrastructure\u2019; SC upholds Allahabad HC\u2019s decision making DND flyway toll-free","og_description":"'Public defrauded under guise of necessary public infrastructure'; SC upheld Allahabad HC's decision making DND flyway toll-free","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/12\/21\/sc-upheld-allahabad-hc-decision-making-dnd-flyway-toll-free\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2024-12-21T08:00:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-12-26T05:01:59+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/DND-flyway-toll-free.jpeg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"\u2018Public defrauded under the guise of necessary public infrastructure\u2019; SC upholds Allahabad HC\u2019s decision making DND flyway toll-free","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"9 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/12\/21\/sc-upheld-allahabad-hc-decision-making-dnd-flyway-toll-free\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/12\/21\/sc-upheld-allahabad-hc-decision-making-dnd-flyway-toll-free\/"},"author":{"name":"Editor","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84913f82186a8dea042dc300d5751624"},"headline":"\u2018Public defrauded under the guise of necessary public infrastructure\u2019; SC upholds Allahabad HC\u2019s decision making DND flyway toll-free","datePublished":"2024-12-21T08:00:00+00:00","dateModified":"2024-12-26T05:01:59+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/12\/21\/sc-upheld-allahabad-hc-decision-making-dnd-flyway-toll-free\/"},"wordCount":1900,"commentCount":1,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/12\/21\/sc-upheld-allahabad-hc-decision-making-dnd-flyway-toll-free\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/DND-flyway-toll-free.webp","keywords":["Allahabad HC","DND Flyway","Federation of Noida RWA","Justice Surya Kant","Justice Ujjal Bhuyan","Noida Toll Bridge Company","NTBCL","SC","Supreme Court","toll collection","toll-free"],"articleSection":["Case Briefs","Supreme Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/12\/21\/sc-upheld-allahabad-hc-decision-making-dnd-flyway-toll-free\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/12\/21\/sc-upheld-allahabad-hc-decision-making-dnd-flyway-toll-free\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/12\/21\/sc-upheld-allahabad-hc-decision-making-dnd-flyway-toll-free\/","name":"SC upholds Allahabad HC's decision making DND flyway toll-free | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/12\/21\/sc-upheld-allahabad-hc-decision-making-dnd-flyway-toll-free\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/12\/21\/sc-upheld-allahabad-hc-decision-making-dnd-flyway-toll-free\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/DND-flyway-toll-free.webp","datePublished":"2024-12-21T08:00:00+00:00","dateModified":"2024-12-26T05:01:59+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84913f82186a8dea042dc300d5751624"},"description":"'Public defrauded under guise of necessary public infrastructure'; SC upheld Allahabad HC's decision making DND flyway toll-free","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/12\/21\/sc-upheld-allahabad-hc-decision-making-dnd-flyway-toll-free\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/12\/21\/sc-upheld-allahabad-hc-decision-making-dnd-flyway-toll-free\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/12\/21\/sc-upheld-allahabad-hc-decision-making-dnd-flyway-toll-free\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/DND-flyway-toll-free.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/DND-flyway-toll-free.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"\u2018Public defrauded under the guise of necessary public infrastructure\u2019; SC upholds Allahabad HC\u2019s decision making DND flyway toll-free"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/12\/21\/sc-upheld-allahabad-hc-decision-making-dnd-flyway-toll-free\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"\u2018Public defrauded under the guise of necessary public infrastructure\u2019; SC upholds Allahabad HC\u2019s decision making DND flyway toll-free"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84913f82186a8dea042dc300d5751624","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d822f35f9fcd11386aa47345cde7945e45a64da7205eebe9784f21d0cd223603?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d822f35f9fcd11386aa47345cde7945e45a64da7205eebe9784f21d0cd223603?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d822f35f9fcd11386aa47345cde7945e45a64da7205eebe9784f21d0cd223603?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc-online-editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/DND-flyway-toll-free.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":82141,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/10\/26\/allahabad-high-court-declares-dnd-flyway-toll-free\/","url_meta":{"origin":337710,"position":0},"title":"Allahabad High Court declares DND Flyway toll free","author":"Saba","date":"October 26, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"As reported on Hindustan Times, the Allahabad High Court has declared the Delhi-Noida-Delhi (DND) Flyway toll free, with immediate effect. The Court directed the Noida Toll Bridge Company Ltd. to stop collecting the toll tax from commuters. Source: Hindustan Times","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Hot Off The Press&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Hot Off The Press","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/hot_off_the_press\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":375275,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/10\/know-your-judge-chief-justice-surya-kant-supreme-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":337710,"position":1},"title":"Know Thy Judge | Chief Justice Surya Kant: Journey from bustling town of Hisar to the Supreme Court of India","author":"Ritu","date":"February 10, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Chief Justice Surya Kant embarked on a remarkable journey that saw him rise from humble beginnings to being the Judge of the Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chief Justice of Himachal Pradesh High Court and ultimately the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of India.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Know thy Judge&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Know thy Judge","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/judges-information\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Chief Justice Surya Kant","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/BLOG-93-6.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/BLOG-93-6.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/BLOG-93-6.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/BLOG-93-6.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":6659,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/05\/28\/appeals-regarding-land-acquisition-in-villages-of-noida-and-greater-noida-dismissed\/","url_meta":{"origin":337710,"position":2},"title":"Appeals regarding Land Acquisition in villages of Noida and Greater Noida, dismissed","author":"Sucheta","date":"May 28, 2015","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: Dismissing the present appeals filed on the issue of land acquisitions in several villages of Noida, Gautam Budh Nagar and Greater Noida, the 3 Judge Bench comprising of H.L.Dattu, C.J, A.K. Sikri and Arun Mishra, JJ., observed that the Allahabad High Court had studied the ground realities to\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Supreme Court&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Supreme Court","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/supremecourt\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":340927,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/10\/know-your-judge-justice-surya-kant-supreme-court-life-career-judgments-legal-news-2\/","url_meta":{"origin":337710,"position":3},"title":"Know Thy Judge | Justice Surya Kant: Journey from bustling town of Hisar to the Supreme Court of India","author":"Ritu","date":"February 10, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"Justice Surya Kant embarked on a remarkable journey that saw him rise from humble beginnings to being the Judge of the Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chief Justice of Himachal Pradesh High Court and ultimately the Judge of the Supreme Court of India.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Know thy Judge&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Know thy Judge","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/judges-information\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Justice Surya Kant","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/KTJ-55.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/KTJ-55.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/KTJ-55.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/KTJ-55.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":293277,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/27\/5-high-courts-to-get-new-chief-justices\/","url_meta":{"origin":337710,"position":4},"title":"5 High Courts to get new Chief Justices","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"May 27, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"KERALA HIGH COURT \u21aa Shri Justice Sarasa Venkatanarayana Bhatti, Judge, Kerala High Court, appointed as the Chief Justice of the Kerala High Court with effect from the date he assumes charge of his office. HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT \u21aa\u00a0Shri Justice Mamidanna Satya Ratna Sri Ramachandra Rao, Judge, Punjab & Haryana\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Appointments &amp; Transfers&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Appointments &amp; Transfers","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/appointments\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"new chief justices of high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/new-chief-justices-of-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/new-chief-justices-of-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/new-chief-justices-of-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/new-chief-justices-of-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":356819,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/18\/2025-scc-vol-6-part-4-latest-supreme-court-cases\/","url_meta":{"origin":337710,"position":5},"title":"2025 SCC Vol. 6 Part 4","author":"Sonali Ahuja","date":"August 18, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"2025 SCC Vol. 6 Part 4: Explore the latest Supreme Court Cases on Constitution, Contract and Specific Relief, Arbitration, Enemy Property, IBC, Education Law, and Criminal Law.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Cases Reported&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Cases Reported","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casesreported\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"2025 SCC Vol. 6 Part 4","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/2025-SCC-Vol.-6-Part-4.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/2025-SCC-Vol.-6-Part-4.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/2025-SCC-Vol.-6-Part-4.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/2025-SCC-Vol.-6-Part-4.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/337710","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67517"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=337710"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/337710\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/337713"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=337710"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=337710"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=337710"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}