{"id":337577,"date":"2024-12-19T15:00:23","date_gmt":"2024-12-19T09:30:23","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=337577"},"modified":"2024-12-26T11:44:46","modified_gmt":"2024-12-26T06:14:46","slug":"dhc-grants-interim-protection-to-moti-mahal-restrains-its-ex-franchisee-from-using-moti-mahals-registered-trade-marks","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/12\/19\/dhc-grants-interim-protection-to-moti-mahal-restrains-its-ex-franchisee-from-using-moti-mahals-registered-trade-marks\/","title":{"rendered":"Delhi High Court grants interim protection to Moti Mahal; temporarily restrains its ex-franchisee from using Moti Mahal\u2019s registered trade marks"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Delhi High Court:<\/span> In a suit filed by the plaintiffs seeking permanent and mandatory injunction for infringement and passing off registered trade marks and copyright, a Single Judge Bench of <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Mini Pushkarna, J.<\/span>, stated that the plaintiffs had demonstrated a prima facie case for grant of injunction and, in case, no ex parte ad interim injunction was granted, the plaintiffs would suffer an irreparable loss. Further, balance of convenience was also in favour of the plaintiffs, and against the defendants.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Thus, the Court restrained Defendant 1, from using the impugned marks &#8216;MOTI MAHAL&#8217;, &#8216;MOTI MAHAL DELUX&#8217; and &#8216;MOTI MAHAL DELUX TANDOORI TRAIL\/ <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/15_interim-protection-to-Moti-Mahal-1.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/15_interim-protection-to-Moti-Mahal-1.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"67\" height=\"35\" \/><\/a>or any other mark deceptively and\/or confusingly similar and\/or identical\/virtually identical to the plaintiffs&#8217; trade marks.<\/p>\n<h3>Background<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In the present case, Plaintiff 1 was the rightful and exclusive owner and registered proprietor of the trade marks &#8216;MOTI MAHAL&#8217;, &#8216;MOTI MAHAL GROUP&#8217;, &#8216;MOTI MAHAL MANAGEMENT SERVICES&#8217;. Further, Plaintiffs 1-2 and 4 were the rightful and exclusive owners and registered proprietors of the trade mark &#8216;TANDOORI TRAIL&#8217;, used in relation to high quality and famous restaurants operating throughout the country and around the globe.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">It was submitted that Defendant 1 was the ex-franchisee of Plaintiff 1 and was engaged in the business of providing restaurant, catering and hospitality services, carrying on business. The present suit was a blatant case of infringement and passing off as well as unfair trade practices, wherein, Defendant 1 was continuing to carry on its operations under the trade mark &#8216;MOTI MAHAL DELUX TANDOORI TRAIL&#8217;\/ <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/15_interim-protection-to-Moti-Mahal-2.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/15_interim-protection-to-Moti-Mahal-2.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"67\" height=\"35\" \/><\/a>, despite the termination of the Franchise Agreement.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The mala fide of Defendant 1 was further evident from the fact that, in addition to the continued use of aforesaid marks, they also dishonestly adopted and were using the mark &#8216;MOTI MAHAL DELUX&#8217;, which was deceptively and\/or confusingly similar to the plaintiffs&#8217; earlier, well-known and registered trade marks, with just the addition of the suffix &#8216;DELUX&#8217;. It was submitted that this addition, in no way diminished the deceptive similarity of the same, when compared to the plaintiffs&#8217; earlier, well-known and registered trade marks.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">It was submitted that Defendant 1, being the ex-franchisee of Plaintiff 1 was clearly aware of the ownership and notoriety of the &#8216;MOTI MAHAL&#8217;, &#8216;MOTI MAHAL DELUX TANDOORI TRAIL&#8217;, &#8216;TANDOORI TRAIL&#8217; and their formative marks as well as the goodwill and reputation enjoyed by the plaintiffs in and to the said trade marks. Further, Defendant 1 being a party to the Franchise Agreement was aware that it had no rights in any manner whatsoever in the aforesaid marks or their formatives.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Thus, it was submitted that such acts of Defendant 1 constituted wilful infringement of the plaintiffs&#8217; earlier, well-known registered trade marks, passing off and unfair trade practices, in an obvious attempt to mislead the consumers, potential franchisees and public at large and also to ride upon the immense goodwill and reputation earned by the plaintiffs over the last more than 100 years.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The plaintiffs further submitted that they had also been using the oval devices, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/15_interim-protection-to-Moti-Mahal-3.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/15_interim-protection-to-Moti-Mahal-3.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"175\" height=\"30\" \/><\/a>, represented in the stylized manner and artistic impression. The said oval device was an original artistic work and was liable to be protected under Section 2(c) of the Copyright Act, 1957. Any unauthorized use or reproduction or dealing in any goods bearing the characteristics of the aforesaid artistic works not only amounted to infringement of copyrights but also constituted cognizable criminal offence under the provisions of the Copyright Act, 1957.<\/p>\n<h3>Comparison of the two marks:<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%; text-align: center;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/15_interim-protection-to-Moti-Mahal-4.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/15_interim-protection-to-Moti-Mahal-4.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"409\" height=\"201\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<h3>Analysis, Law, and Decision<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">After considering the circumstances, the Court stated that the plaintiffs had demonstrated a prima facie case for grant of injunction and, in case, no ex parte ad interim injunction was granted, the plaintiffs would suffer an irreparable loss. Further, balance of convenience was also in favour of the plaintiffs, and against the defendants.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Thus, the Court restrained Defendant 1, its principals, partners, officers, employees, agents, distributors, suppliers, affiliates, subsidiaries, franchisees, licensees, representatives, group companies, assignees, etc. from advertising, selling, offering for sale, marketing, promoting any restaurant and catering business or in any other manner whatsoever, using the impugned marks &#8216;MOTI MAHAL&#8217;, &#8216;MOTI MAHAL DELUX&#8217; and &#8216;MOTI MAHAL DELUX TANDOORI TRAIL\/ <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/15_interim-protection-to-Moti-Mahal-5.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/15_interim-protection-to-Moti-Mahal-5.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"67\" height=\"35\" \/><\/a>or any other mark deceptively and\/or confusingly similar and\/or identical\/virtually identical to the plaintiffs&#8217; trade marks.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Further, Defendant 1 was directed to remove the references of all the impugned marks &#8216;MOTI MAHAL&#8217;, &#8216;MOTI MAHAL DELUX&#8217; and\/or &#8216;MOTI MAHAL DELUX TANDOORI TRAIL&#8217;\/<a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/15_interim-protection-to-Moti-Mahal-6.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/15_interim-protection-to-Moti-Mahal-6.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"67\" height=\"35\" \/><\/a>from the board\/hoarding of the impugned restaurant outside the premises of Defendant 1, from various social media websites.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The matter would next be listed on 06-05-2025.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Moti Mahal Delux Management Services (P) Ltd. v. SRMJ Business Promoters (P) Ltd., <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/iUX97sYL\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2024 SCC OnLine Del 8909<\/a>, decided on 12-12-2024<\/span>]<\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the Plaintiffs:<\/span> Shreya Sethi with Anirudh Bhatia, Advocates.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">Plaintiffs submitted that being the ex-franchisee, Defendant 1 was clearly aware of the ownership and notoriety of the &#8216;MOTI MAHAL&#8217;, &#8216;MOTI MAHAL DELUX TANDOORI TRAIL&#8217;, &#8216;TANDOORI TRAIL&#8217; and their formative marks as well as the goodwill and reputation enjoyed by the plaintiffs related to the said trade marks.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67520,"featured_media":314886,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[53065,2543,76601,35585,69176,76599,76600,53386,66009,2616,52951],"class_list":["post-337577","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-copyright-act-1957","tag-Delhi_High_Court","tag-ex-franchisee","tag-interim-protection","tag-justice-mini-pushkarna","tag-moti-mahal","tag-moti-mahal-delux","tag-registered-trade-mark","tag-temporarily-restrains","tag-Trade_Mark","tag-trade-marks-act-1999"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>DHC grants interim protection to Moti Mahal; temporarily restrains its ex-franchisee from using Moti Mahal&#039;s registered trade marks| SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Delhi High Court granted interim protection to Moti Mahal; temporarily restrained its ex-franchisee from using Moti Mahal&#039;s registered trade marks.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/12\/19\/dhc-grants-interim-protection-to-moti-mahal-restrains-its-ex-franchisee-from-using-moti-mahals-registered-trade-marks\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Delhi High Court grants interim protection to Moti Mahal; temporarily restrains its ex-franchisee from using Moti Mahal\u2019s registered trade marks\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Delhi High Court granted interim protection to Moti Mahal; temporarily restrained its ex-franchisee from using Moti Mahal&#039;s registered trade marks.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/12\/19\/dhc-grants-interim-protection-to-moti-mahal-restrains-its-ex-franchisee-from-using-moti-mahals-registered-trade-marks\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-12-19T09:30:23+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-12-26T06:14:46+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"591\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Arushi\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Delhi High Court grants interim protection to Moti Mahal; temporarily restrains its ex-franchisee from using Moti Mahal\u2019s registered trade marks\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Arushi\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/12\/19\/dhc-grants-interim-protection-to-moti-mahal-restrains-its-ex-franchisee-from-using-moti-mahals-registered-trade-marks\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/12\/19\/dhc-grants-interim-protection-to-moti-mahal-restrains-its-ex-franchisee-from-using-moti-mahals-registered-trade-marks\/\",\"name\":\"DHC grants interim protection to Moti Mahal; temporarily restrains its ex-franchisee from using Moti Mahal's registered trade marks| SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/12\/19\/dhc-grants-interim-protection-to-moti-mahal-restrains-its-ex-franchisee-from-using-moti-mahals-registered-trade-marks\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/12\/19\/dhc-grants-interim-protection-to-moti-mahal-restrains-its-ex-franchisee-from-using-moti-mahals-registered-trade-marks\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-12-19T09:30:23+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-12-26T06:14:46+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/ded7dcfe9a971ee0916ce27ee7c09c76\"},\"description\":\"Delhi High Court granted interim protection to Moti Mahal; temporarily restrained its ex-franchisee from using Moti Mahal's registered trade marks.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/12\/19\/dhc-grants-interim-protection-to-moti-mahal-restrains-its-ex-franchisee-from-using-moti-mahals-registered-trade-marks\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/12\/19\/dhc-grants-interim-protection-to-moti-mahal-restrains-its-ex-franchisee-from-using-moti-mahals-registered-trade-marks\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/12\/19\/dhc-grants-interim-protection-to-moti-mahal-restrains-its-ex-franchisee-from-using-moti-mahals-registered-trade-marks\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp\",\"width\":887,\"height\":591,\"caption\":\"Delhi High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/12\/19\/dhc-grants-interim-protection-to-moti-mahal-restrains-its-ex-franchisee-from-using-moti-mahals-registered-trade-marks\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Delhi High Court grants interim protection to Moti Mahal; temporarily restrains its ex-franchisee from using Moti Mahal\u2019s registered trade marks\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/ded7dcfe9a971ee0916ce27ee7c09c76\",\"name\":\"Arushi\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/6b48b1199732c282ba60ff0b2a7076c33917ee6bd9aca6c333a92ceb8fcb6a3d?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/6b48b1199732c282ba60ff0b2a7076c33917ee6bd9aca6c333a92ceb8fcb6a3d?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Arushi\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/arushi\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"DHC grants interim protection to Moti Mahal; temporarily restrains its ex-franchisee from using Moti Mahal's registered trade marks| SCC Times","description":"Delhi High Court granted interim protection to Moti Mahal; temporarily restrained its ex-franchisee from using Moti Mahal's registered trade marks.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/12\/19\/dhc-grants-interim-protection-to-moti-mahal-restrains-its-ex-franchisee-from-using-moti-mahals-registered-trade-marks\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Delhi High Court grants interim protection to Moti Mahal; temporarily restrains its ex-franchisee from using Moti Mahal\u2019s registered trade marks","og_description":"Delhi High Court granted interim protection to Moti Mahal; temporarily restrained its ex-franchisee from using Moti Mahal's registered trade marks.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/12\/19\/dhc-grants-interim-protection-to-moti-mahal-restrains-its-ex-franchisee-from-using-moti-mahals-registered-trade-marks\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2024-12-19T09:30:23+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-12-26T06:14:46+00:00","og_image":[{"width":887,"height":591,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Arushi","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Delhi High Court grants interim protection to Moti Mahal; temporarily restrains its ex-franchisee from using Moti Mahal\u2019s registered trade marks","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Arushi","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/12\/19\/dhc-grants-interim-protection-to-moti-mahal-restrains-its-ex-franchisee-from-using-moti-mahals-registered-trade-marks\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/12\/19\/dhc-grants-interim-protection-to-moti-mahal-restrains-its-ex-franchisee-from-using-moti-mahals-registered-trade-marks\/","name":"DHC grants interim protection to Moti Mahal; temporarily restrains its ex-franchisee from using Moti Mahal's registered trade marks| SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/12\/19\/dhc-grants-interim-protection-to-moti-mahal-restrains-its-ex-franchisee-from-using-moti-mahals-registered-trade-marks\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/12\/19\/dhc-grants-interim-protection-to-moti-mahal-restrains-its-ex-franchisee-from-using-moti-mahals-registered-trade-marks\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp","datePublished":"2024-12-19T09:30:23+00:00","dateModified":"2024-12-26T06:14:46+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/ded7dcfe9a971ee0916ce27ee7c09c76"},"description":"Delhi High Court granted interim protection to Moti Mahal; temporarily restrained its ex-franchisee from using Moti Mahal's registered trade marks.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/12\/19\/dhc-grants-interim-protection-to-moti-mahal-restrains-its-ex-franchisee-from-using-moti-mahals-registered-trade-marks\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/12\/19\/dhc-grants-interim-protection-to-moti-mahal-restrains-its-ex-franchisee-from-using-moti-mahals-registered-trade-marks\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/12\/19\/dhc-grants-interim-protection-to-moti-mahal-restrains-its-ex-franchisee-from-using-moti-mahals-registered-trade-marks\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp","width":887,"height":591,"caption":"Delhi High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/12\/19\/dhc-grants-interim-protection-to-moti-mahal-restrains-its-ex-franchisee-from-using-moti-mahals-registered-trade-marks\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Delhi High Court grants interim protection to Moti Mahal; temporarily restrains its ex-franchisee from using Moti Mahal\u2019s registered trade marks"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/ded7dcfe9a971ee0916ce27ee7c09c76","name":"Arushi","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/6b48b1199732c282ba60ff0b2a7076c33917ee6bd9aca6c333a92ceb8fcb6a3d?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/6b48b1199732c282ba60ff0b2a7076c33917ee6bd9aca6c333a92ceb8fcb6a3d?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Arushi"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/arushi\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":338384,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/03\/ipr-roundup-top-intellectual-property-rights-cases-2024\/","url_meta":{"origin":337577,"position":0},"title":"IPR Roundup 2024: The Most Game-Changing Intellectual Property Rights Cases of the Year","author":"Editor","date":"January 3, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"Discover the year's most impactful IPR cases, including landmark decisions on copyright infringements, trademark conflicts, patent disputes, and more, shaping the future of intellectual property law.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Legal RoundUp&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Legal RoundUp","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/columns-for-roundup\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"2024 IPR cases","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/2024-IPR-cases.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/2024-IPR-cases.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/2024-IPR-cases.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/2024-IPR-cases.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":330846,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/16\/dhc-grants-interim-relief-to-gujarat-co-operative-restrains-terre-primitive-from-using-marks-logos-similar-to-amul\/","url_meta":{"origin":337577,"position":1},"title":"[Amul v. Amuleti] Delhi HC grants interim relief to Gujarat Co-operative Milk Marketing Federation Ltd; restrains Terre Primitive from using marks\/logos similar to \u2018AMUL\u2019","author":"Arushi","date":"September 16, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The plaintiffs submitted that Defendant 1 is dishonestly using an identical and deceptively similar trade mark as that of the plaintiffs\u2019, so that any ordinary consumer would be misled to believe that Defendant 1\u2019s products are that of the plaintiffs or associated with or emanating from the plaintiffs.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":287658,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/24\/delhi-high-court-grants-permanent-injunction-to-sandisk-llc-for-its-trade-marks-sandisk-and-cruzer-blade-awards-rs-5-lakhs-as-damages-legal-research-updates-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":337577,"position":2},"title":"Delhi High Court grants permanent injunction to SanDisk LLC for its trade marks \u2018SanDisk\u2019 and \u2018Cruzer Blade\u2019; awards Rs. 5 lakhs as damages","author":"Simranjeet","date":"March 24, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction to SanDisk LLC for its trade mark \u2018SanDisk\u2019 and \u2018Cruzer blade\u2019. Additionally, Rs. 5 lakhs were awarded as damages.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-472.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-472.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-472.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-472.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":340573,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/06\/dhc-grants-ad-interim-injunction-to-leading-pharmaceutical-company-novartis-restrains-use-of-novitas-mark\/","url_meta":{"origin":337577,"position":3},"title":"Delhi High Court grants ad interim injunction to leading pharmaceutical company NOVARTIS; restrains use of NOVITAS mark","author":"Arushi","date":"February 6, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The plaintiffs submitted that the confusingly similar trade mark in the field of pharmaceuticals, create greater injury as compared to products and services in other fields.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":272767,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/01\/delhi-high-court-grants-interim-injunction-ex-parte-dominos-dominick-trademark-infringement-suit-deceptive-similarity-cheese-burst-pasta-italiano-balance-of-convinience-restrains-legalupdates-legalres\/","url_meta":{"origin":337577,"position":4},"title":"Delhi High Court restrains Dominick Pizza from using Dominos mark along with its dishes Cheese Burst and Pasta Italiano having deceptive similarity","author":"Editor","date":"September 1, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: In a case where Dominos IP Holder LLC, popularly known as Dominos (\u2018plaintiff') was seeking protection of the mark \u2018Domino's Pizza', and the accompanying device mark, logo mark, as also the marks \u2018Cheese Burst' and \u2018Pasta Italiano', its popular dishes as Defendant 1 was using a deceptively\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-33-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-33-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-33-1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-33-1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-33-1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":278667,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/21\/delhi-high-court-grants-ex-parte-ad-interim-injunction-to-american-eagle-against-ektarfa-garments-in-a-trademark-and-copyright-infringement-suit\/","url_meta":{"origin":337577,"position":5},"title":"Delhi High Court grants ex-parte ad-interim injunction to American Eagle against Ektarfa Garments in a trademark and copyright infringement suit","author":"Editor","date":"November 21, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Delhi High Court: In a case where application was filed under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 read with Section 51 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (Code) in a trademark and copyright infringement suit, the Single Judge Bench of Jyoti Singh, J. Passed an Order granting ex-parte\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/337577","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67520"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=337577"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/337577\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/314886"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=337577"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=337577"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=337577"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}