{"id":337371,"date":"2024-12-17T15:00:20","date_gmt":"2024-12-17T09:30:20","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=337371"},"modified":"2024-12-17T14:26:35","modified_gmt":"2024-12-17T08:56:35","slug":"bomhc-refuses-quash-fir-against-people-allegedly-slapped-mp-belonging-to-sc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/12\/17\/bomhc-refuses-quash-fir-against-people-allegedly-slapped-mp-belonging-to-sc\/","title":{"rendered":"Bombay HC refuses to quash FIR against two people who allegedly slapped a Member of Parliament belonging to Scheduled Caste"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Bombay High Court:<\/span> Petitioners approached this Court for quashing the FIR registered at Dadar police station on 17-07-2024 under Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001551147\" target=\"_blank\">3(1)(r) and 3(1)(s)<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002828505\" target=\"_blank\">Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989<\/a> (&#8216;the SC &amp; ST Act&#8217;) and under Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9001803451\" target=\"_blank\">115(2)<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9001803655\" target=\"_blank\">3(5)<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9001803718\" target=\"_blank\">356<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9001804326\" target=\"_blank\">Nyaya Sanhita, 2023<\/a>. The Division Bench of Sarang V. Kotwal and Dr. Neela Gokhale, JJ., opined that there was no justification for slapping a member of parliament belonging to a scheduled caste, in public view and uttering derogatory words. The Court thus held that no case was made out for quashing the FIR.<\/p>\n<h3>Background<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The FIR was lodged by the first informant &#8216;SD&#8217;, who was the President of Maharashtra Pradesh Bahujan Samaj Party. It was stated that the party&#8217;s executive committee had a meeting on 17-07-2024 and the name of the new President for Maharashtra and the new committee members had to be announced. The meeting was to be attended by &#8216;G&#8217;, M.P. Rajya Sabha and both petitioners were standing in queue to welcome &#8216;G&#8217; and when Petitioner 1 came in front of &#8216;G&#8217;, she slapped him. Thereafter, both petitioners uttered derogatory words with reference to the two castes by saying that the party was made up of the people from those two scheduled castes. It was mentioned in the FIR that both petitioners did this act as they did not get the ticket to contest for Lok Sabha for that party and they were angry with &#8216;G&#8217;. Thus, based on these allegations, the FIR was lodged.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Counsel for petitioners submitted that when Petitioner 1 went on stage, &#8216;SD&#8217; demanded Rs 5 lakhs, and one &#8216;SB&#8217; abused her, and she was pushed from the stage. It was stated that the FIR was against petitioners, was a result of political vendetta and was lodged with malafide intentions. Whereas counsel for respondents submitted that the offences were made out as there were many eyewitnesses to the incident and the CCTV footage had captured the entire incident.<\/p>\n<h3>Analysis, Law, and Decision<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court stated that the FIR referred to by petitioners which was lodged at Bhandara police station did not make any reference to slapping of &#8216;G&#8217; which was the subject matter of the case lodged at the Dadar police station. The Court further stated that initially there was no allegation of demand of Rs 5 lakhs, but Petitioner 1 later mentioned it in her FIR. The allegations before were about abuse and assault.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court in relation to the contention that the FIR was lodged because of the political vendetta, opined that there was sufficient material collected during investigation to indicate that the incident did take place and there were no false allegations against petitioners due to political vendetta. The Court opined that actual slapping of &#8216;G&#8217; was an offence under Section 3(2)(v-a) of the SC &amp; ST Act.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court stated that though the investigating agency did not apply Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561632\" target=\"_blank\">323<\/a><a id=\"fnref1\" href=\"#fn1\" title=\"1. Corresponding Section 115(2) of the Nyaya Sanhita, 2023\"><sup>1<\/sup><\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\">Penal Code, 1860<\/a> in the FIR, the material collected during the investigation clearly made out existence of ingredients of Section 323.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court further stated that the incident had taken place in a public place and there were references to two scheduled castes and utterance was in derogation of those two castes. The said incident followed the incident of assaulting &#8216;G&#8217;. The Court opined that petitioners&#8217; intention was clearly made out in the FIR and the incident was witnessed by many other people and the incident recorded in the CCTV camera supported the version in the FIR and of the eye witnesses.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court stated that there were overwhelming circumstances and material against petitioners. The Court opined that there was no justification for slapping a member of parliament belonging to a scheduled caste, in public view and uttering derogatory words. The Court thus held that the offences under the SC &amp; ST Act were made out and no case for quashing the FIR was made out.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Neema Sanjay Rangari v. State of Maharashtra, Criminal Writ Petition No. 3879 of 2024, decided on 02-12-2024<\/span>]<\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the Petitioners:<\/span> Ashwin Thool i\/b. Archismati Chandramore for Petitioners.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the Respondents:<\/span> M.H. Mhatre, APP for State\/Respondent; Rajendra Shirodkar, Senior Advocate a\/w Nihar S. Ghag a\/w Anil Y. Bansode a\/w Pradeep Shirsat for Respondent 2.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<hr\/>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn1\" href=\"#fnref1\">1.<\/a> Corresponding Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9001803451\" target=\"_blank\">115(2)<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9001804326\" target=\"_blank\">Nyaya Sanhita, 2023<\/a><\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Penal Code, 1860 &nbsp; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1158\" target=\"_blank\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1158\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"penal code, 1860\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294601\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-768x511.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-440x293.jpg 440w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-650x433.jpg 650w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860.jpg 886w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-60x40.jpg 60w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">There is sufficient material collected during investigation to indicate that the incident did take place and that slapping &#8216;G&#8217; is an offence under Section 3(2)(v-a) of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":314919,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[70737,2569,71597,71816,31833,29912,29584],"class_list":["post-337371","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-bahujan-samaj-party","tag-Bombay_High_Court","tag-justice-dr-neela-gokhale","tag-justice-sarang-v-kotwal","tag-member-of-parliament","tag-sc-st-act","tag-scheduled-caste"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Bombay HC refuses to quash FIR against two people who allegedly slapped a Member of Parliament belonging to Scheduled Caste | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Bombay High Court refused to quash FIR against two people who allegedly slapped a Member of Parliament belonging to the Scheduled Caste.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/12\/17\/bomhc-refuses-quash-fir-against-people-allegedly-slapped-mp-belonging-to-sc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Bombay HC refuses to quash FIR against two people who allegedly slapped a Member of Parliament belonging to Scheduled Caste\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Bombay High Court refused to quash FIR against two people who allegedly slapped a Member of Parliament belonging to the Scheduled Caste.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/12\/17\/bomhc-refuses-quash-fir-against-people-allegedly-slapped-mp-belonging-to-sc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-12-17T09:30:20+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"591\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Simranjeet\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Bombay HC refuses to quash FIR against two people who allegedly slapped a Member of Parliament belonging to Scheduled Caste\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Simranjeet\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/12\/17\/bomhc-refuses-quash-fir-against-people-allegedly-slapped-mp-belonging-to-sc\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/12\/17\/bomhc-refuses-quash-fir-against-people-allegedly-slapped-mp-belonging-to-sc\/\",\"name\":\"Bombay HC refuses to quash FIR against two people who allegedly slapped a Member of Parliament belonging to Scheduled Caste | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/12\/17\/bomhc-refuses-quash-fir-against-people-allegedly-slapped-mp-belonging-to-sc\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/12\/17\/bomhc-refuses-quash-fir-against-people-allegedly-slapped-mp-belonging-to-sc\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-12-17T09:30:20+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/aaee99423671d3377042373c5dcdabbd\"},\"description\":\"Bombay High Court refused to quash FIR against two people who allegedly slapped a Member of Parliament belonging to the Scheduled Caste.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/12\/17\/bomhc-refuses-quash-fir-against-people-allegedly-slapped-mp-belonging-to-sc\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/12\/17\/bomhc-refuses-quash-fir-against-people-allegedly-slapped-mp-belonging-to-sc\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/12\/17\/bomhc-refuses-quash-fir-against-people-allegedly-slapped-mp-belonging-to-sc\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp\",\"width\":887,\"height\":591,\"caption\":\"Bombay High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/12\/17\/bomhc-refuses-quash-fir-against-people-allegedly-slapped-mp-belonging-to-sc\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Bombay HC refuses to quash FIR against two people who allegedly slapped a Member of Parliament belonging to Scheduled Caste\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/aaee99423671d3377042373c5dcdabbd\",\"name\":\"Simranjeet\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/03d92c7ef8267a8c57730c194d10ea045f0dc6cb00ce27a633a2e25adccce1c9?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/03d92c7ef8267a8c57730c194d10ea045f0dc6cb00ce27a633a2e25adccce1c9?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Simranjeet\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Bombay HC refuses to quash FIR against two people who allegedly slapped a Member of Parliament belonging to Scheduled Caste | SCC Times","description":"Bombay High Court refused to quash FIR against two people who allegedly slapped a Member of Parliament belonging to the Scheduled Caste.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/12\/17\/bomhc-refuses-quash-fir-against-people-allegedly-slapped-mp-belonging-to-sc\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Bombay HC refuses to quash FIR against two people who allegedly slapped a Member of Parliament belonging to Scheduled Caste","og_description":"Bombay High Court refused to quash FIR against two people who allegedly slapped a Member of Parliament belonging to the Scheduled Caste.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/12\/17\/bomhc-refuses-quash-fir-against-people-allegedly-slapped-mp-belonging-to-sc\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2024-12-17T09:30:20+00:00","og_image":[{"width":887,"height":591,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Simranjeet","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Bombay HC refuses to quash FIR against two people who allegedly slapped a Member of Parliament belonging to Scheduled Caste","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Simranjeet","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/12\/17\/bomhc-refuses-quash-fir-against-people-allegedly-slapped-mp-belonging-to-sc\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/12\/17\/bomhc-refuses-quash-fir-against-people-allegedly-slapped-mp-belonging-to-sc\/","name":"Bombay HC refuses to quash FIR against two people who allegedly slapped a Member of Parliament belonging to Scheduled Caste | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/12\/17\/bomhc-refuses-quash-fir-against-people-allegedly-slapped-mp-belonging-to-sc\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/12\/17\/bomhc-refuses-quash-fir-against-people-allegedly-slapped-mp-belonging-to-sc\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp","datePublished":"2024-12-17T09:30:20+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/aaee99423671d3377042373c5dcdabbd"},"description":"Bombay High Court refused to quash FIR against two people who allegedly slapped a Member of Parliament belonging to the Scheduled Caste.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/12\/17\/bomhc-refuses-quash-fir-against-people-allegedly-slapped-mp-belonging-to-sc\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/12\/17\/bomhc-refuses-quash-fir-against-people-allegedly-slapped-mp-belonging-to-sc\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/12\/17\/bomhc-refuses-quash-fir-against-people-allegedly-slapped-mp-belonging-to-sc\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp","width":887,"height":591,"caption":"Bombay High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/12\/17\/bomhc-refuses-quash-fir-against-people-allegedly-slapped-mp-belonging-to-sc\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Bombay HC refuses to quash FIR against two people who allegedly slapped a Member of Parliament belonging to Scheduled Caste"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/aaee99423671d3377042373c5dcdabbd","name":"Simranjeet","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/03d92c7ef8267a8c57730c194d10ea045f0dc6cb00ce27a633a2e25adccce1c9?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/03d92c7ef8267a8c57730c194d10ea045f0dc6cb00ce27a633a2e25adccce1c9?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Simranjeet"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":238605,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/05\/casteism-is-obstruction-abuse-by-upper-caste-person-due-to-property-dispute-an-offence-under-sc-st-act-not-in-all-cases-says-sc\/","url_meta":{"origin":337371,"position":0},"title":"Is obstruction &#038; abuse by upper caste person due to property dispute an offence under SC\/ST Act? Not in all cases, says SC","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"November 5, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: In a case where abuses were hurled by a person of upper caste at a person belonging to Scheduled Caste due to a property dispute between them, the 3-judge bench of L. Nageswara Rao, Hemant Gupta* and Ajay Rastogi, JJ has held that no offence under Section 3(1)(r)\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":293437,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/30\/supreme-court-decides-what-constitutes-caste-based-insult\/","url_meta":{"origin":337371,"position":1},"title":"Does \u2018Caste based insult\u2019 include calling person belonging to Scheduled Caste or Tribe \u201cBewakoof\u201d, \u201cMurkh\u201d, \u201cChor\u201d? Supreme Court answers","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"May 30, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Supreme Court observed that it is desirable that before an accused is subjected to a trial for alleged commission of offence under section 3(1)(x), the utterances made by him in any place within public view are outlined, if not in the F.I.R., but at least in the charge-sheet so\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"caste based insult","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/caste-based-insult-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/caste-based-insult-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/caste-based-insult-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/caste-based-insult-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":215850,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/18\/guj-hc-knowledge-of-the-caste-enough-to-invoke-ss-32v-and-v-a-of-the-sc-st-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":337371,"position":2},"title":"Guj HC | Knowledge of the caste enough to invoke Ss. 3(2)(v) and (v-a) of the SC\/ST Act","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"June 18, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Gujarat High Court: Umesh A. Trivedi, J. dismissed the present writ petition preferred under Section 14-A of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (for short \u2018Atrocities Act\u2019). This appeal challenged the order passed by Additional Sessions Judge (Special Court for Atrocities), Dhoraji. Counsel for the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/1200px-Gujarat-High-Court-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/1200px-Gujarat-High-Court-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/1200px-Gujarat-High-Court-1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/1200px-Gujarat-High-Court-1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/1200px-Gujarat-High-Court-1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":93761,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/20\/central-and-state-governments-directed-to-strictly-enforce-the-scheduled-castes-and-scheduled-tribes-prevention-of-atrocities-act-1989\/","url_meta":{"origin":337371,"position":3},"title":"Central and State Governments directed to strictly enforce the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"December 20, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: In a petition highlighting the plight of the members of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes, the Court noticed that there has been a failure in complying with the provisions of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 as the laudable object with which the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/DSC_5487.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/DSC_5487.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/DSC_5487.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/DSC_5487.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/DSC_5487.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/DSC_5487.jpg?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":270893,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/30\/allahabad-high-court-section-3-2-v-of-sc-and-st-act-1989-only-attracts-by-way-of-documentary-evidence-to-prove-that-the-injured-belongs-to-sc-or-st-conviction-and-sentence-modified\/","url_meta":{"origin":337371,"position":4},"title":"Allahabad High Court | Section 3 (2) (v) of SC and ST Act, 1989 only attracts by way of documentary evidence to prove that the injured belongs to SC or ST; Conviction and sentence, modified","author":"Editor","date":"July 30, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Allahabad High Court: The Division Bench of Kaushal Jayendra Thaker and Ajai Tyagi, JJ. while deciding an appeal which was filed challenging the judgment and order of convicting accused-appellant under Sections 326 of Penal Code, 1860 (\u2018IPC') and Section 3 (2) (v) of Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Allahabad High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/allahabad_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/allahabad_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/allahabad_high_court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/allahabad_high_court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/allahabad_high_court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":230332,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/06\/01\/ph-hc-no-offence-constituted-under-sc-st-act-where-abusive-language-in-the-name-of-caste-used-over-phone-call-criminal-proceedings-against-accused-quashed\/","url_meta":{"origin":337371,"position":5},"title":"P&#038;H HC | No offence constituted under SC\/ST Act where abusive language in the name of caste used over phone call: Criminal proceedings against accused quashed","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"June 1, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Punjab and Haryana High Court:\u00a0Harnaresh Singh Gill, J.,quashed the criminal proceedings against the appellant accused of using abusive language against the complainant over a phone call in the name of his caste. Petitions were filed against the order passed by Additional Sessions Judge (Exclusive Court for Heinous Crime against Women),\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/337371","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=337371"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/337371\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/314919"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=337371"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=337371"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=337371"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}