{"id":335970,"date":"2024-11-26T10:00:41","date_gmt":"2024-11-26T04:30:41","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=335970"},"modified":"2024-11-30T16:11:05","modified_gmt":"2024-11-30T10:41:05","slug":"delhi-high-court-quashes-fir-rape-kidnapping-pocso-marriage-settlement-legal-news","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/26\/delhi-high-court-quashes-fir-rape-kidnapping-pocso-marriage-settlement-legal-news\/","title":{"rendered":"Delhi High Court quashes FIR in rape, kidnapping & POCSO case following marriage and mutual settlement"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Delhi High Court:<\/span> A petition was filed by the petitioner under Section 528<\/a> of BNSS<\/a> (erstwhile Section 482<\/a> of CrPC<\/a>) seeking quashing of FIR registered under Section 363<\/a> of IPC<\/a>, and thereafter, the chargesheet has been filed under Sections 363<\/a>, 365<\/a>, 376<\/a>, 368<\/a>, 212<\/a>, 506<\/a>, 34<\/a> Penal Code, 1860<\/a> (IPC), and Section 4<\/a> of Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act<\/a>. Jasmeet Singh. J.<\/span>, quashed the FIR and proceedings as quashing of such proceedings on account of compromise would bring about peace and would secure ends of justice.<\/p>\n

An FIR was registered under Section 363<\/a> of Penal Code, 1860<\/a> (IPC), later culminating in a chargesheet filed under Sections 363<\/a>, 365<\/a>, 376<\/a>, 368<\/a>, 212<\/a>, 506<\/a>, and 34<\/a> of the IPC<\/a>, as well as Section 4<\/a> of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act<\/a>. The complainant, the father of a minor girl, alleged that his 16-year-old daughter had been kidnapped by Petitioner 1. During the pendency of the proceedings, it emerged that the prosecutrix and Petitioner 1 had been in a consensual relationship. They later married in 2019, according to Muslim rites and customs, and now have two children. The prosecutrix, now 25 years old, and her father informed the Court of their willingness to settle the dispute and quash the proceedings. Both parties affirmed that the settlement was entered into voluntarily and without coercion.<\/p>\n

Counsel for the petitioners contended that the prosecutrix had willingly eloped with petitioner 1 and subsequently married him. Counsel further argued that continuing the proceedings would disrupt the peace and stability of the family unit, especially given the presence of minor children born from the marriage.<\/p>\n

The Additional Public Prosecutor (APP), however, vehemently opposed the quashing of the FIR. The APP underscored the seriousness of the allegations, particularly the charge under Section 376 IPC, which constitutes an offence against society. It was argued that such cases should not be compromised as they carry broader implications for societal welfare.<\/p>\n

The Court undertook a nuanced analysis of the facts, balancing the nature of the allegations against the subsequent developments in the lives of the parties. The Court acknowledged that while offences like rape and those under the POCSO Act<\/a> are grave and generally non-compoundable, the peculiar facts of this case warranted a different approach. The prosecutrix had been a minor at the time of the incident, making her consent legally irrelevant. However, the Court observed that there was no evidence of force or coercion in the relationship.<\/p>\n

The Court noted that FIRs in similar cases had been quashed to preserve familial harmony. It noted that the prosecutrix and Petitioner 1 had married, their families had accepted the union, and they were raising children together. The Court further observed that prosecuting Petitioner 1 would likely harm the family’s stability and prospects, including those of the minor children.<\/p>\n

The Court emphasized that while it must be cautious in quashing FIRs in cases involving heinous offences, it cannot ignore the welfare of the prosecutrix, her children, and the family unit. It also noted that the prosecutrix had unequivocally expressed her desire to put the matter to rest and continue living with her husband without any legal impediments.<\/p>\n

The Court quashed FIR and all consequential proceedings emanating therefrom as continuing the proceedings would serve no constructive purpose and would instead disrupt the lives of the parties involved. The Court held that quashing the FIR would secure the ends of justice and bring peace to the lives of the prosecutrix, her husband, and their children.<\/p>\n

[Moeed Ahamad v. State NCT of Delhi, 2024 SCC OnLine Del 8119<\/a>, decided on 19-11-2024<\/span>]<\/p>\n

Judgment By: Justice Jasmeet Singh<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n\n

Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n

Mr Lewish Edward, Advocate for petitioner<\/p>\n

Mr Sanjeev Sabharwal, APP for State with Ms Sanya Narula, Adv. SI Nagendra Singh, PS- Mahendra Park.<\/p>\n

Buy Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012   HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n

\"protection<\/a><\/p>\n

Buy Penal Code, 1860   HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n

\"penal<\/a><\/p>\n

Buy Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973  HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n

\"Code<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

In cases involving Section 376 IPC or the POCSO Act, Courts must exercise caution while quashing FIRs, as these offences impact societal interests. However, Delhi High Court acknowledged the unique circumstances where the petitioner and the prosecutrix, now married with children, had reached a settlement, balancing societal concerns with the realities of the parties’ lives.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67516,"featured_media":314886,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[73846,68448,2543,75621,75623,3696,75622,44554,23524,58908],"class_list":["post-335970","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-bharatiya-nagrik-suraksha-sanhita","tag-bnss","tag-Delhi_High_Court","tag-fir-quashing","tag-ipc-376","tag-kidnapping","tag-marriage-settlement","tag-mutual-settlement","tag-pocso-act","tag-rape-case"],"yoast_head":"\nDelhi HC quashes FIR in rape, kidnapping & POCSO case following marriage and mutual settlement| SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Delhi High Court quashes FIR in rape, kidnapping & POCSO case following marriage and mutual settlement.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/26\/delhi-high-court-quashes-fir-rape-kidnapping-pocso-marriage-settlement-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Delhi High Court quashes FIR in rape, kidnapping & POCSO case following marriage and mutual settlement\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Delhi High Court quashes FIR in rape, kidnapping & POCSO case following marriage and mutual settlement.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/26\/delhi-high-court-quashes-fir-rape-kidnapping-pocso-marriage-settlement-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-11-26T04:30:41+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-11-30T10:41:05+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"591\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Arunima\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Delhi High Court quashes FIR in rape, kidnapping & POCSO case following marriage and mutual settlement\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Arunima\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/26\/delhi-high-court-quashes-fir-rape-kidnapping-pocso-marriage-settlement-legal-news\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/26\/delhi-high-court-quashes-fir-rape-kidnapping-pocso-marriage-settlement-legal-news\/\",\"name\":\"Delhi HC quashes FIR in rape, kidnapping & POCSO case following marriage and mutual settlement| SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/26\/delhi-high-court-quashes-fir-rape-kidnapping-pocso-marriage-settlement-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/26\/delhi-high-court-quashes-fir-rape-kidnapping-pocso-marriage-settlement-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-11-26T04:30:41+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-11-30T10:41:05+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/12b21fd8f65a572f39f27151710e16cb\"},\"description\":\"Delhi High Court quashes FIR in rape, kidnapping & POCSO case following marriage and mutual settlement.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/26\/delhi-high-court-quashes-fir-rape-kidnapping-pocso-marriage-settlement-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/26\/delhi-high-court-quashes-fir-rape-kidnapping-pocso-marriage-settlement-legal-news\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/26\/delhi-high-court-quashes-fir-rape-kidnapping-pocso-marriage-settlement-legal-news\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp\",\"width\":887,\"height\":591,\"caption\":\"Delhi High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/26\/delhi-high-court-quashes-fir-rape-kidnapping-pocso-marriage-settlement-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Delhi High Court quashes FIR in rape, kidnapping & POCSO case following marriage and mutual settlement\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/12b21fd8f65a572f39f27151710e16cb\",\"name\":\"Arunima\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8375ad8b08b1cbd970f4484d3218d81f3222a0ee3e463210f657780cb13e9569?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8375ad8b08b1cbd970f4484d3218d81f3222a0ee3e463210f657780cb13e9569?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Arunima\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc-editor_9\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Delhi HC quashes FIR in rape, kidnapping & POCSO case following marriage and mutual settlement| SCC Times","description":"Delhi High Court quashes FIR in rape, kidnapping & POCSO case following marriage and mutual settlement.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/26\/delhi-high-court-quashes-fir-rape-kidnapping-pocso-marriage-settlement-legal-news\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Delhi High Court quashes FIR in rape, kidnapping & POCSO case following marriage and mutual settlement","og_description":"Delhi High Court quashes FIR in rape, kidnapping & POCSO case following marriage and mutual settlement.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/26\/delhi-high-court-quashes-fir-rape-kidnapping-pocso-marriage-settlement-legal-news\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2024-11-26T04:30:41+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-11-30T10:41:05+00:00","og_image":[{"width":887,"height":591,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Arunima","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Delhi High Court quashes FIR in rape, kidnapping & POCSO case following marriage and mutual settlement","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Arunima","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/26\/delhi-high-court-quashes-fir-rape-kidnapping-pocso-marriage-settlement-legal-news\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/26\/delhi-high-court-quashes-fir-rape-kidnapping-pocso-marriage-settlement-legal-news\/","name":"Delhi HC quashes FIR in rape, kidnapping & POCSO case following marriage and mutual settlement| SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/26\/delhi-high-court-quashes-fir-rape-kidnapping-pocso-marriage-settlement-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/26\/delhi-high-court-quashes-fir-rape-kidnapping-pocso-marriage-settlement-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp","datePublished":"2024-11-26T04:30:41+00:00","dateModified":"2024-11-30T10:41:05+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/12b21fd8f65a572f39f27151710e16cb"},"description":"Delhi High Court quashes FIR in rape, kidnapping & POCSO case following marriage and mutual settlement.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/26\/delhi-high-court-quashes-fir-rape-kidnapping-pocso-marriage-settlement-legal-news\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/26\/delhi-high-court-quashes-fir-rape-kidnapping-pocso-marriage-settlement-legal-news\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/26\/delhi-high-court-quashes-fir-rape-kidnapping-pocso-marriage-settlement-legal-news\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp","width":887,"height":591,"caption":"Delhi High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/26\/delhi-high-court-quashes-fir-rape-kidnapping-pocso-marriage-settlement-legal-news\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Delhi High Court quashes FIR in rape, kidnapping & POCSO case following marriage and mutual settlement"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/12b21fd8f65a572f39f27151710e16cb","name":"Arunima","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8375ad8b08b1cbd970f4484d3218d81f3222a0ee3e463210f657780cb13e9569?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8375ad8b08b1cbd970f4484d3218d81f3222a0ee3e463210f657780cb13e9569?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Arunima"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc-editor_9\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":328382,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/09\/delhi-high-court-quashes-fir-rape-kidnapping-pocso-based-settlement-section376-section363-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":335970,"position":0},"title":"Delhi HC quashes FIR in Rape, Kidnapping, and POCSO case based on Settlement without imposing costs","author":"Arunima","date":"August 9, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court has quashed an FIR registered under Sections 376 (rape), 363 (kidnapping), and 6 of the POCSO Act (aggravated penetrative assault). The decision was based on an amicable settlement between the parties, with no costs imposed on either side. This case underscores the court's recognition of mutually agreed\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":228886,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/04\/30\/bom-hc-court-refuses-to-quash-fir-against-rape-accused-despite-settlement-where-victims-consent-to-settlement-appears-coerced\/","url_meta":{"origin":335970,"position":1},"title":"Bom HC | Court refuses to quash FIR against rape accused despite settlement where victim\u2019s consent to settlement appears coerced","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"April 30, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court: A Division Bench of S.S. Shinde and V.G. Bisht, JJ. refused to quash the FIR and criminal proceedings against the petitioner, a rape accused, despite settlement between the petitioner and the victim. The matter related to alleged sexual assault and exploitation of the victim by the petitioner.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":222355,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/21\/del-hc-quashing-of-fir-in-henious-and-serious-case-of-rape-denied-even-where-accused-subsequently-married-the-vicitm\/","url_meta":{"origin":335970,"position":2},"title":"Del HC | Quashing of FIR in a heinous and serious case of rape denied even where accused subsequently married the victim","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 21, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: Brijesh Sethi, J., while stating that, \u201cRape not only causes serious injury to a woman\u2019s body, her honour and dignity and even if such an offence is settled by the offender and victim, this offence being not private in nature but has a serious impact on the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":243188,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/02\/01\/del-hc-offences-under-s-377-ipc-s-4-pocso-act-committed-on-a-child-aged-7-years-father-of-victim-sought-quashing-of-fir-will-hc-quash-the-fir-read-to-know\/","url_meta":{"origin":335970,"position":3},"title":"Del HC | Offences under S. 377 IPC & S. 4 POCSO Act committed on a child aged 7 years, father of victim sought quashing of FIR: Will HC quash the FIR? Read to know","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"February 1, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: Subramonium Prasad, J., in regard to quashing of FIRs expressed that: \"High Court cannot mechanically quash FIRs for non-compoundable offences by exercising powers under Section 482 CrPC just because parties have decided to bury their hatchets.\" The instant petition was filed for quashing of an FIR for\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":267779,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/02\/kar-hc-addressed-whether-offence-under-s-376-ipc-can-be-compounded-in-case-of-settlement-arrived-between-the-parties\/","url_meta":{"origin":335970,"position":4},"title":"[Rape] Kar HC addressed whether offence under S. 376 IPC can be compounded in case of settlement arrived between the parties","author":"Editor","date":"June 2, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Karnataka High Court: M Nagaprasanna, J., quashed the proceedings against the petitioners in Crime No.87 of 2022 of Byadarahalli Police Station pending before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bangalore Rural District, Bangalore. The facts are that the respondent 2 is the complainant who filed made an FIR for the offence punishable\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Karnataka High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/New_Karnataka.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/New_Karnataka.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/New_Karnataka.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/New_Karnataka.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/New_Karnataka.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":268073,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/08\/in-matrimonial-offences-quashing-is-welcome-as-it-shows-that-parties-have-decided-to-put-an-end-to-the-lis-as-well-as-to-the-misery\/","url_meta":{"origin":335970,"position":5},"title":"In matrimonial offences, quashing is welcome as it shows that parties have decided to put an end to the lis as well as to the misery they undergo: Del HC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"June 8, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: Stating that, cases under Section 376 of Penal Code, 1860 should not be quashed and should not be taken as a crime against the society at large, Swarana Kanta Sharma, J., expressed that, in peculiar circumstances, where the complainant states that her future depends on quashing of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/335970","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67516"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=335970"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/335970\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/314886"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=335970"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=335970"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=335970"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}