{"id":335749,"date":"2024-11-23T09:00:16","date_gmt":"2024-11-23T03:30:16","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=335749"},"modified":"2024-11-30T15:23:04","modified_gmt":"2024-11-30T09:53:04","slug":"rajasthan-high-court-quashes-fir-under-sc-st-act-against-actress-shilpa-shetty-for-use-of-word-bhangi-in-2013-interview","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/23\/rajasthan-high-court-quashes-fir-under-sc-st-act-against-actress-shilpa-shetty-for-use-of-word-bhangi-in-2013-interview\/","title":{"rendered":"Rajasthan High Court quashes FIR under SC\/ST Act against actress Shilpa Shetty for use of word \u201cBhangi\u201d in 2013 Interview"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Rajasthan High Court:<\/span> In a petition filed by the petitioner, Actress Shilpa Raj Kundra, seeking the quashment of FIR for offenses under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561415\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">153-A<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Penal Code, 1860<\/a> (IPC) and Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001551147\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">3(1)(r) &amp; (u)<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002828505\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989<\/a> (SC\/ST Act), a single-judge bench of Arun Monga, J., held that the FIR lacked legal and factual merit, failed to establish essential ingredients of the alleged offenses, constituted an abuse of the process of law and accordingly, quashed the FIR.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In the instant matter, a FIR was filed based on a complaint, alleging that film actors Salman Khan and Shilpa Raj Kundra used the term &#8220;Bhangi&#8221; in a 2013 television interview, offending sentiments of the Valmiki community. The FIR was registered in December 2017, after more than three years of the said interview. The petitioner filed the present petition seeking to quash the FIR and argued that the alleged remarks lacked malicious intent, were taken out of context, and did not constitute any of the offenses alleged under the IPC or the SC\/ST Act.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The petitioner contended that the FIR was filed over three years after the alleged remarks and lacked any explanation for the delay, thereby rendering it doubtful and legally unsustainable. It was contended that the SC\/ST Act provisions mentioned in the FIR were introduced in 2016 and since the interview occurred in 2013, these provisions cannot be applied retrospectively. It was contended that the remarks lacked any intent to promote enmity or insult the Valmiki community, as required under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561415\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">153-A<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">IPC<\/a> and the SC\/ST Act. It was lastly contended that the cognizance of Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561415\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">153-A<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">IPC<\/a> was barred under Section 196 CrPC due to the absence of government sanction.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">However, the prosecution contended that the FIR should not be quashed at the investigation stage, as incriminating material could emerge during the inquiry. It was contended that the words used were derogatory and caused social unrest, justifying the continuation of proceedings.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court observed that the unexplained delay in lodging the FIR cast serious doubts on its credibility, thereby violating the principles laid down by the Supreme Court in <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Manoj Kumar Sharma<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">State of Chhattisgarh<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/XE5kbJO0\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(2016) 9 SCC 1<\/a>. The Court noted that since the provisions of the SC\/ST Act invoked in the FIR were introduced post-2013, therefore they are inapplicable. The Court noted that the absence of mandatory sanction under Section 196 CrPC further rendered the FIR invalid.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court stated that the SC\/ST Act requires specific intent to insult or harm members of the community. The Court noted that the said remarks were made in a casual context without evidence of intent to humiliate or harm the Valmiki community, as required under the SC\/ST Act. The Court asserted that the FIR lacked any such allegation or evidence, and the term &#8220;Bhangi,&#8221; while offensive in certain contexts, did not meet the legal threshold for invoking the Act.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court further asserted that the FIR failed to establish the intent to promote enmity or disrupt public tranquility as required under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561415\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">153-A<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">IPC<\/a>. The Court stated that the casual remarks made by the petitioner which lacked malicious intent did not meet the stringent requirements of Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561415\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">153-A<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">IPC<\/a>. The Court held that the FIR constituted an abuse of legal process and quashed it in its entirety.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Shilpa Raj Kundra<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">State of Rajasthan<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/053Byu5q\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2024 SCC OnLine Raj 3362<\/a>, Decided on 18-10-2024<\/span>]<\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">Mr. Prashant Patil with Mr. Shakti Pandey, Mr. Gopal Sandhu, Ms. Palak Saxena and Mr. Atishay Jain, Counsel for the Petitioner;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">Mr. Vikram Rajpurohit, P.P., Counsel for the Respondents.<\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Penal Code, 1860 &nbsp; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1158\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1158\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"penal code, 1860\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294601\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-768x511.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-440x293.jpg 440w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-650x433.jpg 650w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860.jpg 886w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-60x40.jpg 60w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">&#8220;One cannot lose sight of the reality that celebrities and public figures invariably tend to speak in a casual tone during interviews, and it is thus essential to consider the broader context rather than isolating specific words.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67514,"featured_media":314824,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[75299,43486,67205,50352,2575,2653,29912,45536,75510,75509],"class_list":["post-335749","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-bhangi","tag-derogatory-remarks","tag-justice-arun-monga","tag-quashment-of-fir","tag-Rajasthan_High_Court","tag-Salman_Khan","tag-sc-st-act","tag-section-153a-ipc","tag-shilpa-raj-kundra","tag-shilpa-shetty"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Rajasthan High Court quashes SC\/ST Act case against actress Shilpa Shetty for use of word \u201cBhangi\u201d in 2013 Interview | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Rajasthan High Court quashed the SC\/ST Act case against actress Shilpa Shetty for use of word \u201cBhangi\u201d in 2013 Interview.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/23\/rajasthan-high-court-quashes-fir-under-sc-st-act-against-actress-shilpa-shetty-for-use-of-word-bhangi-in-2013-interview\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Rajasthan High Court quashes FIR under SC\/ST Act against actress Shilpa Shetty for use of word \u201cBhangi\u201d in 2013 Interview\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Rajasthan High Court quashed the SC\/ST Act case against actress Shilpa Shetty for use of word \u201cBhangi\u201d in 2013 Interview.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/23\/rajasthan-high-court-quashes-fir-under-sc-st-act-against-actress-shilpa-shetty-for-use-of-word-bhangi-in-2013-interview\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-11-23T03:30:16+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-11-30T09:53:04+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"591\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Rajasthan High Court quashes FIR under SC\/ST Act against actress Shilpa Shetty for use of word \u201cBhangi\u201d in 2013 Interview\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/23\/rajasthan-high-court-quashes-fir-under-sc-st-act-against-actress-shilpa-shetty-for-use-of-word-bhangi-in-2013-interview\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/23\/rajasthan-high-court-quashes-fir-under-sc-st-act-against-actress-shilpa-shetty-for-use-of-word-bhangi-in-2013-interview\/\",\"name\":\"Rajasthan High Court quashes SC\/ST Act case against actress Shilpa Shetty for use of word \u201cBhangi\u201d in 2013 Interview | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/23\/rajasthan-high-court-quashes-fir-under-sc-st-act-against-actress-shilpa-shetty-for-use-of-word-bhangi-in-2013-interview\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/23\/rajasthan-high-court-quashes-fir-under-sc-st-act-against-actress-shilpa-shetty-for-use-of-word-bhangi-in-2013-interview\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-11-23T03:30:16+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-11-30T09:53:04+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\"},\"description\":\"Rajasthan High Court quashed the SC\/ST Act case against actress Shilpa Shetty for use of word \u201cBhangi\u201d in 2013 Interview.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/23\/rajasthan-high-court-quashes-fir-under-sc-st-act-against-actress-shilpa-shetty-for-use-of-word-bhangi-in-2013-interview\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/23\/rajasthan-high-court-quashes-fir-under-sc-st-act-against-actress-shilpa-shetty-for-use-of-word-bhangi-in-2013-interview\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/23\/rajasthan-high-court-quashes-fir-under-sc-st-act-against-actress-shilpa-shetty-for-use-of-word-bhangi-in-2013-interview\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp\",\"width\":887,\"height\":591,\"caption\":\"Rajasthan High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/23\/rajasthan-high-court-quashes-fir-under-sc-st-act-against-actress-shilpa-shetty-for-use-of-word-bhangi-in-2013-interview\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Rajasthan High Court quashes FIR under SC\/ST Act against actress Shilpa Shetty for use of word \u201cBhangi\u201d in 2013 Interview\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\",\"name\":\"Ritu\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Ritu\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_7\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Rajasthan High Court quashes SC\/ST Act case against actress Shilpa Shetty for use of word \u201cBhangi\u201d in 2013 Interview | SCC Times","description":"Rajasthan High Court quashed the SC\/ST Act case against actress Shilpa Shetty for use of word \u201cBhangi\u201d in 2013 Interview.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/23\/rajasthan-high-court-quashes-fir-under-sc-st-act-against-actress-shilpa-shetty-for-use-of-word-bhangi-in-2013-interview\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Rajasthan High Court quashes FIR under SC\/ST Act against actress Shilpa Shetty for use of word \u201cBhangi\u201d in 2013 Interview","og_description":"Rajasthan High Court quashed the SC\/ST Act case against actress Shilpa Shetty for use of word \u201cBhangi\u201d in 2013 Interview.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/23\/rajasthan-high-court-quashes-fir-under-sc-st-act-against-actress-shilpa-shetty-for-use-of-word-bhangi-in-2013-interview\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2024-11-23T03:30:16+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-11-30T09:53:04+00:00","og_image":[{"width":887,"height":591,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Ritu","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Rajasthan High Court quashes FIR under SC\/ST Act against actress Shilpa Shetty for use of word \u201cBhangi\u201d in 2013 Interview","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Ritu","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/23\/rajasthan-high-court-quashes-fir-under-sc-st-act-against-actress-shilpa-shetty-for-use-of-word-bhangi-in-2013-interview\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/23\/rajasthan-high-court-quashes-fir-under-sc-st-act-against-actress-shilpa-shetty-for-use-of-word-bhangi-in-2013-interview\/","name":"Rajasthan High Court quashes SC\/ST Act case against actress Shilpa Shetty for use of word \u201cBhangi\u201d in 2013 Interview | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/23\/rajasthan-high-court-quashes-fir-under-sc-st-act-against-actress-shilpa-shetty-for-use-of-word-bhangi-in-2013-interview\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/23\/rajasthan-high-court-quashes-fir-under-sc-st-act-against-actress-shilpa-shetty-for-use-of-word-bhangi-in-2013-interview\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp","datePublished":"2024-11-23T03:30:16+00:00","dateModified":"2024-11-30T09:53:04+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9"},"description":"Rajasthan High Court quashed the SC\/ST Act case against actress Shilpa Shetty for use of word \u201cBhangi\u201d in 2013 Interview.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/23\/rajasthan-high-court-quashes-fir-under-sc-st-act-against-actress-shilpa-shetty-for-use-of-word-bhangi-in-2013-interview\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/23\/rajasthan-high-court-quashes-fir-under-sc-st-act-against-actress-shilpa-shetty-for-use-of-word-bhangi-in-2013-interview\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/23\/rajasthan-high-court-quashes-fir-under-sc-st-act-against-actress-shilpa-shetty-for-use-of-word-bhangi-in-2013-interview\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp","width":887,"height":591,"caption":"Rajasthan High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/23\/rajasthan-high-court-quashes-fir-under-sc-st-act-against-actress-shilpa-shetty-for-use-of-word-bhangi-in-2013-interview\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Rajasthan High Court quashes FIR under SC\/ST Act against actress Shilpa Shetty for use of word \u201cBhangi\u201d in 2013 Interview"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9","name":"Ritu","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Ritu"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_7\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":335319,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/16\/bhangi-neech-bhikhari-mangani-are-not-caste-names-rajasthan-high-court-set-asides-charges-under-sc-st-act-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":335749,"position":0},"title":"\u2018Bhangi, Neech, Bhikhari, Mangani are not caste-based slurs\u2019; Rajasthan High Court set asides charges under SC\/ST Act","author":"Ritu","date":"November 16, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe words used were not caste name nor there is allegation that the petitioners were known to the caste of the public servants, who had gone to remove the encroachments.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Rajasthan High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":336628,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/12\/05\/criminal-law-roundup-recap-of-the-top-criminal-cases-from-november-2024\/","url_meta":{"origin":335749,"position":1},"title":"Criminal Law Roundup: A quick recap of the top criminal cases from November 2024","author":"Editor","date":"December 5, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Top criminal cases on quashing of proceedings, arrest, bail, acquittal, and more.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Legal RoundUp&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Legal RoundUp","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/columns-for-roundup\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Topic-wise roundup","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/blog-2024-12-05T115030.141.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/blog-2024-12-05T115030.141.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/blog-2024-12-05T115030.141.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/blog-2024-12-05T115030.141.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":371160,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/29\/bom-hc-shilpa-ai-generated-deepfake-content-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":335749,"position":2},"title":"Bombay High Court orders immediate takedown of AI-generated deepfake content infringing Shilpa Shetty Kudra&#8217;s privacy and dignity","author":"Ritu","date":"December 29, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cA person\u2019s much less a woman\u2019s dignity cannot be publicly maligned or defamed that too without consent which is the sine qua non for such publications.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Shilpa Shetty AI-generated","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Shilpa-Shetty-AI-generated.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Shilpa-Shetty-AI-generated.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Shilpa-Shetty-AI-generated.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Shilpa-Shetty-AI-generated.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":334510,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/06\/raj-hc-quashes-grievous-hurt-charge-in-altercation-at-eklingji-temple-allows-trial-for-remaining-offenses-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":335749,"position":3},"title":"Rajasthan High Court quashes Grievous Hurt charge against temple security in altercation at Eklingji Temple; allows trial for remaining offenses","author":"Ritu","date":"November 6, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cWhether or not allegations leveled by the complainant are false or not is a matter of trial and shall be decided by the competent trial Court upon filing of the charge sheet which is proposed as per the factual report.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Rajasthan High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":331996,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/27\/any-further-investigation-after-filling-of-police-report-requires-trial-courts-permission-under-section-1939-of-bnss-rajasthan-high-court-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":335749,"position":4},"title":"\u201cAny further investigation after filling of Police Report requires trial court\u2019s permission under Section 193(9) of BNSS\u201d: Rajasthan High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"September 27, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court noted that since the petitioner was not found to be involved in any offence, his plea for quashing the FIR no longer required adjudication.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Rajasthan High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":332947,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/14\/every-citizen-has-right-to-access-temple-and-offer-prayers-raj-hc-quashes-fir-for-temple-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":335749,"position":5},"title":"\u2018Every citizen has right to access temple and offer prayers\u2019; Rajasthan High Court quashes FIR for alleged Trespass at Mahakaleshwar Mahadev Temple","author":"Ritu","date":"October 14, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe fact that the petitioner belongs to a Scheduled Caste\/Scheduled Tribe may have caused some discomfort among the Trustees, leading to the denial of access. Such conduct by the Trustees is unacceptable.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Rajasthan High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/335749","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67514"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=335749"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/335749\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/314824"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=335749"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=335749"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=335749"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}