{"id":335668,"date":"2024-11-22T11:00:45","date_gmt":"2024-11-22T05:30:45","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=335668"},"modified":"2024-11-22T11:10:16","modified_gmt":"2024-11-22T05:40:16","slug":"supreme-court-dismisses-noida-special-economic-zone-authority-appeal-for-claim-of-rs-6-crore","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/22\/supreme-court-dismisses-noida-special-economic-zone-authority-appeal-for-claim-of-rs-6-crore\/","title":{"rendered":"Read why Supreme Court dismissed NOIDA Special Economic Zone Authority\u2019s appeal for claim of Rs. 6 Crore against corporate debtor"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Supreme Court:<\/span> In a set of two civil appeals challenging the decision of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (‘NCLAT’), wherein the challenge to the order of the National Company Law Tribunal, New Delhi (‘NCLT’) approving the Resolution Plan as presented on the approval by the Committee of Creditors and challenge to the approval of the Resolution Plan were rejected, the Division Bench of Abhay S. Oka and Augustine George Masih, JJ., dismissed the appeals, upholding that Resolution Plan approved By Committee Of Creditors and that the IBC prevails over Special Economic Zone Act, 2005<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Background<\/h3>\n

Shree Bhoomika International Limited, being the Corporate Debtor was sub-leased the Plot at NOIDA Special Economic Zone (‘NSEZ’) by Noida Special Economic Zone Authority (‘appellant’) in capacity of lessee of the said land. The lease was valid for a period of 15 years. The appellant’s case was that the Corporate Debtor had begun defaulting on lease payments in 1999, and moreover, there was no performance or activity on the said land since the year 2003-2004 leading to financial losses to the Government Exchequer, and same also being violative of the Special Economic Zone Rules and guidelines framed therein. In the light of the defaults committed by the Corporate Debtor, Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (‘CIRP’) was initiated by the appellant before the NCLT. An Interim Resolution Professional (‘IRP’) was appointed. The appellant filed a claim of Rs. 6,29,18,121\/- which was admitted by the Resolution Professional (‘RP’) in entirety. The liquidation value of the Corporate Debtor was fixed at Rs. 04.25 Crores. Subsequently, an application under Sections 31(1)<\/a> and 60(5)<\/a> of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016<\/a> (‘IBC 2016’) before the NCLT was moved by the RP, seeking an approval of the Resolution Plan on behalf of the Committee of Creditors. The same was allowed by NCLT vide Order dated 05-10-2020, granting only Rs. 50 Lakhs to the appellant against its admitted claim of Rs 06.29 Crores. Being at loggerheads with the RP with respect to the payment of admitted claim, the appellant moved an application before the NCLT challenging the Order dated 05-10-2020, approving the Resolution Plan. However, the same came to be rejected on grounds of lack of jurisdiction, hence, the appellant moved appeals under Section 61<\/a> of IBC 2016<\/a> before the NCLAT, challenging both the orders. These appeals also came to be dismissed vide the impugned Judgment dated 14-02-2022.<\/p>\n

Analysis and Decision<\/h3>\n

Regarding the appellant’s assertions as to the statutory dues, the Court said that the same were rightly analysed by the NCLAT as per the ratio laid down in Maharashtra Seamless Ltd.<\/span> v. Padmanabhan Venkatesh<\/span>, (2020) 11 SCC 467<\/a>; Ghanashyam Mishra & Sons (P) Ltd.<\/span> v. Edelweiss Asset Reconstruction Co. Ltd.<\/span>, (2021) 9 SCC 657<\/a>; K. Sashidhar<\/span> v. Indian Overseas Bank<\/span>, (2019) 12 SCC 150<\/a> elucidating that all the dues, including statutory dues owned by the Central Government, State Government and local authority, which is not the part of the Resolution Plan shall stand extinguished and no proceedings in respect of such dues for the period prior to the date on which the Adjudicating Authority had approved the Resolution Plan could be pressed into service or continues.<\/span><\/p>\n

The Court said that no violation of the statute or the procedure was found and the Resolution Plan as approved by the Committee of Creditors being accepted was rightly left untouched. Regarding the claims pertaining to the transfer fees, etc., the Court refused to interfere with the same, stating that the claims were not be interfered with by courts or tribunals as the same stood related to the commercial wisdom of the Committee of Creditors for they being the best persons to determine their interests, and any such interference is non-justiciable except as provided by Section 30(2)<\/a> of IBC 2016<\/a>.<\/span><\/p>\n

The Court stated that fundamentally, the financial decisions taken by Committee of Creditors, especially with regard to viability or otherwise, while evaluating the plan would thus prevail. The Court added that the submission that exemptions from NSEZ payments, including any type of fees or penalty for renewal of sub-lease and\/or for transfer charges due with regard to the change of directorship or shareholding in favour of the Resolution Applicant should be dealt with as per Clause 10.9 of the Resolution Plan could not be accepted in the light of Section 238<\/a> of IBC 2016<\/a>, which provides for the provisions of IBC 2016 to have an overriding effect over the other laws. The Court noted that the amount was disbursed vide Demand Draft and the same was received and accepted by the appellant.<\/p>\n

Placing reliance upon Essar Steel India Ltd. Committee of Creditors<\/span> v. Satish Kumar Gupta<\/span>, (2020) 8 SCC 531<\/a> and its reiteration by numerous subsequent decisions of this Court, the Court refused to accept the claim of the appellant. Hence, the impugned orders dated 05-10-2020 and 27-11-2020, as have been passed by the NCLT and approved by the NCLAT did not call for any interference.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\n

CASE DETAILS<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n<\/colgroup>\n\n\n
\n

Citation:<\/span>
2024 SCC OnLine SC 3123<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n

Appellants :<\/span>
Noida Special Economic Zone Authority<\/p>\n

Respondents :<\/span>
Manish Agarwal<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

Advocates who appeared in this case<\/p>\n

For Petitioner(s):<\/span> <\/p>\n

For Respondent(s):<\/span> <\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

CORAM :<\/span><\/p>\n

\n
\n

\"Abhay
Abhay S. Oka, J.<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

\"Augustine
Augustine George Masih, J.<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The claims pertaining to the transfer fees, etc., cannot be dealt with by courts or tribunals as the same relates to the commercial wisdom of the Committee of Creditors for they are the best persons to determine their interests, and any such interference is non-justiciable except as provided by Section 30(2) of IBC 2016.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67517,"featured_media":335681,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,9],"tags":[32458,30361,44110,72244,58527,75499,30228,75500,5363],"class_list":["post-335668","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-supremecourt","tag-committee-of-creditors","tag-ibc","tag-irp","tag-justice-abhay-oka","tag-justice-augustine-george-masih","tag-noida-sez","tag-resolution-plan","tag-section-238-of-ibc","tag-supreme-court"],"yoast_head":"\nSupreme Court dismisses NOIDA Special Economic Zone Authority\u2019s appeal for claim of Rs. 6 Crore | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Supreme Court dismisses NOIDA Special Economic Zone Authority\u2019s appeal for claim of Rs. 6 Crore against corporate debtor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/22\/supreme-court-dismisses-noida-special-economic-zone-authority-appeal-for-claim-of-rs-6-crore\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Read why Supreme Court dismissed NOIDA Special Economic Zone Authority\u2019s appeal for claim of Rs. 6 Crore against corporate debtor\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Supreme Court dismisses NOIDA Special Economic Zone Authority\u2019s appeal for claim of Rs. 6 Crore against corporate debtor\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/22\/supreme-court-dismisses-noida-special-economic-zone-authority-appeal-for-claim-of-rs-6-crore\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-11-22T05:30:45+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-11-22T05:40:16+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/NOIDA-Special-Economic-Zone-Authority.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Read why Supreme Court dismissed NOIDA Special Economic Zone Authority\u2019s appeal for claim of Rs. 6 Crore against corporate debtor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/22\/supreme-court-dismisses-noida-special-economic-zone-authority-appeal-for-claim-of-rs-6-crore\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/22\/supreme-court-dismisses-noida-special-economic-zone-authority-appeal-for-claim-of-rs-6-crore\/\",\"name\":\"Supreme Court dismisses NOIDA Special Economic Zone Authority\u2019s appeal for claim of Rs. 6 Crore | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/22\/supreme-court-dismisses-noida-special-economic-zone-authority-appeal-for-claim-of-rs-6-crore\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/22\/supreme-court-dismisses-noida-special-economic-zone-authority-appeal-for-claim-of-rs-6-crore\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/NOIDA-Special-Economic-Zone-Authority.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-11-22T05:30:45+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-11-22T05:40:16+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84913f82186a8dea042dc300d5751624\"},\"description\":\"Supreme Court dismisses NOIDA Special Economic Zone Authority\u2019s appeal for claim of Rs. 6 Crore against corporate debtor\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/22\/supreme-court-dismisses-noida-special-economic-zone-authority-appeal-for-claim-of-rs-6-crore\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/22\/supreme-court-dismisses-noida-special-economic-zone-authority-appeal-for-claim-of-rs-6-crore\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/22\/supreme-court-dismisses-noida-special-economic-zone-authority-appeal-for-claim-of-rs-6-crore\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/NOIDA-Special-Economic-Zone-Authority.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/NOIDA-Special-Economic-Zone-Authority.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"NOIDA Special Economic Zone Authority\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/22\/supreme-court-dismisses-noida-special-economic-zone-authority-appeal-for-claim-of-rs-6-crore\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Read why Supreme Court dismissed NOIDA Special Economic Zone Authority\u2019s appeal for claim of Rs. 6 Crore against corporate debtor\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84913f82186a8dea042dc300d5751624\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d822f35f9fcd11386aa47345cde7945e45a64da7205eebe9784f21d0cd223603?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d822f35f9fcd11386aa47345cde7945e45a64da7205eebe9784f21d0cd223603?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc-online-editor\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Supreme Court dismisses NOIDA Special Economic Zone Authority\u2019s appeal for claim of Rs. 6 Crore | SCC Times","description":"Supreme Court dismisses NOIDA Special Economic Zone Authority\u2019s appeal for claim of Rs. 6 Crore against corporate debtor","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/22\/supreme-court-dismisses-noida-special-economic-zone-authority-appeal-for-claim-of-rs-6-crore\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Read why Supreme Court dismissed NOIDA Special Economic Zone Authority\u2019s appeal for claim of Rs. 6 Crore against corporate debtor","og_description":"Supreme Court dismisses NOIDA Special Economic Zone Authority\u2019s appeal for claim of Rs. 6 Crore against corporate debtor","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/22\/supreme-court-dismisses-noida-special-economic-zone-authority-appeal-for-claim-of-rs-6-crore\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2024-11-22T05:30:45+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-11-22T05:40:16+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/NOIDA-Special-Economic-Zone-Authority.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Read why Supreme Court dismissed NOIDA Special Economic Zone Authority\u2019s appeal for claim of Rs. 6 Crore against corporate debtor","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/22\/supreme-court-dismisses-noida-special-economic-zone-authority-appeal-for-claim-of-rs-6-crore\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/22\/supreme-court-dismisses-noida-special-economic-zone-authority-appeal-for-claim-of-rs-6-crore\/","name":"Supreme Court dismisses NOIDA Special Economic Zone Authority\u2019s appeal for claim of Rs. 6 Crore | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/22\/supreme-court-dismisses-noida-special-economic-zone-authority-appeal-for-claim-of-rs-6-crore\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/22\/supreme-court-dismisses-noida-special-economic-zone-authority-appeal-for-claim-of-rs-6-crore\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/NOIDA-Special-Economic-Zone-Authority.webp","datePublished":"2024-11-22T05:30:45+00:00","dateModified":"2024-11-22T05:40:16+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84913f82186a8dea042dc300d5751624"},"description":"Supreme Court dismisses NOIDA Special Economic Zone Authority\u2019s appeal for claim of Rs. 6 Crore against corporate debtor","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/22\/supreme-court-dismisses-noida-special-economic-zone-authority-appeal-for-claim-of-rs-6-crore\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/22\/supreme-court-dismisses-noida-special-economic-zone-authority-appeal-for-claim-of-rs-6-crore\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/22\/supreme-court-dismisses-noida-special-economic-zone-authority-appeal-for-claim-of-rs-6-crore\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/NOIDA-Special-Economic-Zone-Authority.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/NOIDA-Special-Economic-Zone-Authority.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"NOIDA Special Economic Zone Authority"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/22\/supreme-court-dismisses-noida-special-economic-zone-authority-appeal-for-claim-of-rs-6-crore\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Read why Supreme Court dismissed NOIDA Special Economic Zone Authority\u2019s appeal for claim of Rs. 6 Crore against corporate debtor"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84913f82186a8dea042dc300d5751624","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d822f35f9fcd11386aa47345cde7945e45a64da7205eebe9784f21d0cd223603?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d822f35f9fcd11386aa47345cde7945e45a64da7205eebe9784f21d0cd223603?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc-online-editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/NOIDA-Special-Economic-Zone-Authority.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":297888,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/28\/operational-creditor-cannot-claim-payment-equal-to-financial-creditor-in-insolvency-proceeding-under-ibc-nclat\/","url_meta":{"origin":335668,"position":0},"title":"Operational Creditor cannot claim payment equal to Financial Creditor in Insolvency proceeding under IBC: NCLAT","author":"Ritu","date":"July 28, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The principle of equality is applicable only in same class of creditors, i.e., secured or unsecured, financial or operational.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"national company law appellate tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":209399,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/04\/nclat-parties-may-settle-the-claim-in-interregnum-of-filing-of-application-under-s-7-ibc-and-constitution-of-committee-of-creditors\/","url_meta":{"origin":335668,"position":1},"title":"NCLAT | Parties may settle the claim in interregnum of filing of application under S. 7 IBC and constitution of Committee of Creditors","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"February 4, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT): The Bench of Justice S.J. Mukhopadhaya, Chairperson and Justice Bansi Lal Bhat, Member (Judicial) allowed an appeal filed against the order of National Company Law Tribunal (New Delhi) whereby it had admitted respondent's\u00a0application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 and\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":239378,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/20\/whether-an-unsuccessful-resolution-applicant-whose-resolution-plan-gets-rejected-by-coc-has-locus-to-question-implementation-of-approved-resolution-plan-nclat-thoroughly-determines\/","url_meta":{"origin":335668,"position":2},"title":"Whether an ‘Unsuccessful Resolution Applicant’ whose Resolution Plan gets rejected by CoC has locus to question implementation of approved Resolution Plan? NCLAT thoroughly determines","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 20, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT):\u00a0The Bench of Justice Bansi Lal Bhat (Acting Chairperson) and Justice Anant Bijay Singh (Judicial Member), Dr Ashok Kumar Mishra (Technical Member), in the present appeal observed, \"Once the Appellant is out of the fray, it has neither locus to call in question any action\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":348725,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/26\/single-homebuyer-cant-challenge-coc-approved-resolution-plan-nclat-upholds-cocs-commercial-wisdom-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":335668,"position":3},"title":"\u2018Single Homebuyer can\u2019t challenge CoC approved Resolution Plan\u2019; NCLAT upholds CoC\u2019s commercial wisdom","author":"Ritu","date":"May 26, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The Resolution Plan has been approved by 83.46% voting share of the CoC, therefore, at the instance of Appellant, approval of Resolution Plan cannot be allowed to be questioned.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"National Company Law Appellate Tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/resolution-plan.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/resolution-plan.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/resolution-plan.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/resolution-plan.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":261219,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/02\/05\/ibc-amendment-2018-supreme-court-elaborates-conditions-for-disqualification-of-resolution-professional-under-s-29ah-of-ibc\/","url_meta":{"origin":335668,"position":4},"title":"IBC Amendment, 2018; Supreme Court elaborates conditions for disqualification of Resolution Professional under S. 29A(h) of IBC","author":"Editor","date":"February 5, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: In a case were the Division Bench of Sanjay Kishan Kaul and M.M. Sundresh*, JJ., was sought to provide judicial interpretation of Section 29A(h) of the IBC, as amended by the Act, 2018, the Bench held that ineligibility has to be seen from the point of view of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-70.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-70.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-70.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-70.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-70.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":284731,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/22\/resolution-plan-coc-successful-resolution-professional-financial-creditor-application-nclt-reconsider-resolution-plan-allowed-nclat-appeal-dismissed\/","url_meta":{"origin":335668,"position":5},"title":"In what circumstances and conditions, Adjudicating Authority can send back a Resolution Plan to CoC for carrying out changes? NCLAT Answers","author":"Ritu","date":"February 22, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"In the instant matter an appeal was preferred before NCLAT challenging the order of the Adjudicating Authority remitting a Resolution Plan back to the CoC for reconsideration in accordance with law.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"National Company Law Appellate Tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-458.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-458.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-458.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-458.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/335668","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67517"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=335668"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/335668\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/335681"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=335668"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=335668"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=335668"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}