{"id":335319,"date":"2024-11-16T14:00:19","date_gmt":"2024-11-16T08:30:19","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=335319"},"modified":"2024-11-20T11:23:22","modified_gmt":"2024-11-20T05:53:22","slug":"bhangi-neech-bhikhari-mangani-are-not-caste-names-rajasthan-high-court-set-asides-charges-under-sc-st-act-scc-times","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/16\/bhangi-neech-bhikhari-mangani-are-not-caste-names-rajasthan-high-court-set-asides-charges-under-sc-st-act-scc-times\/","title":{"rendered":"\u2018Bhangi, Neech, Bhikhari, Mangani are not caste-based slurs\u2019; Rajasthan High Court set asides charges under SC\/ST Act"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Rajasthan High Court:<\/span> In a petition seeking to quash charges under Penal Code, 1860<\/a> and Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989<\/a> (SC\/ST Act), a single-judge bench of Birendra Kumar, J., quashed the charges under SC\/ST Act and held that to establish an offense under Section 3(1)(X)<\/a> of the SC\/ST Act<\/a>, the intent to humiliate based on caste must be evident, and the act must occur within public view.<\/p>\n

In the instant matter, the petitioners were accused in FIR registered at Police Station Kotawali, Jaisalmer, for offences under Sections 353<\/a>, 332<\/a> read with 34<\/a> of the IPC<\/a> and Section 3(1)(X)<\/a> of the SC\/ST Act<\/a>. The FIR alleged that on 31-01-2011, the complainant and other officials, during a land encroachment inspection, were abused by the petitioners with caste-based slurs like Bhangi, Neech, Bhikhari, Mangani. The police initially submitted a negative report, finding the allegations unsubstantiated. However, upon a protest petition, cognizance was taken, and charges were framed.<\/p>\n

The petitioners contended that the allegations do not satisfy the essential elements of Section 3(1)(X)<\/a> of the SC\/ST Act<\/a>, as the accused lacked knowledge of the caste of the informants and the alleged incident did not occur in public view. The petitioners relied on Ramesh Chandra Vaishya v. State of U.P. and Dashrath Sahu v. State of Chhattisgarh, where similar cases of insufficient evidence led to discharge.<\/p>\n

However, the respondents contended that at the stage of framing charges, the Court only needs to determine whether there is a prima facie case and not conduct a meticulous evaluation of evidence. It was submitted that sufficient material exists to support framing charges under the SC\/ST Act and IPC.<\/p>\n

The Court stated that to invoke Section 3(1)(X) of the SC\/ST Act, intentional humiliation with caste-specific knowledge and public view are crucial. The Court noted that the words used did not explicitly indicate caste-based insult, and the incident occurred during a dispute over land measurement, not motivated by caste bias. The Court found no evidence that the petitioners were aware of the complainant’s caste or that the alleged abuse was caste-based. The Court noted that absence of independent witnesses and the police’s initial negative report further weakened the prosecution’s case under Section 3(1)(x) of the SC\/ST Act.<\/p>\n

The Court quashed the charges under Section 3(1)(x) of the SC\/ST Act and the petitioners were discharged from that offense. However, The Court upheld the charges related to obstruction of public duty and stated that the trial would proceed for these offenses.<\/p>\n

[Achal Singh<\/span> v. State of Rajasthan<\/span>, 2024 SCC OnLine Raj 3311<\/a>, Decided on 12-11-2024<\/span>]<\/p>\n\n

Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n

Mr. Leela Dhar Khatri, Counsel for the Appellants<\/span><\/p>\n

Mr. Surendra Bishnoi, PP, Counsel for the Respondents<\/span><\/p>\n

Buy Penal Code, 1860   HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n

\"penal<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

“The words used were not caste name nor there is allegation that the petitioners were known to the caste of the public servants, who had gone to remove the encroachments.”<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67514,"featured_media":314824,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[75299,75301,75303,75305,75304,61329,19831,48170,75307,75302,75300,38123,75306,74928,2575,29912,34480],"class_list":["post-335319","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-bhangi","tag-bhikhari","tag-caste-names","tag-caste-based-intent","tag-charges-under-sc-st-act","tag-derogatory-language","tag-framing-of-charges","tag-justice-birendra-kumar","tag-land-encroachment-dispute","tag-mangani","tag-neech","tag-prima-facie-evidence","tag-public-view","tag-quashment-of-charges","tag-Rajasthan_High_Court","tag-sc-st-act","tag-scheduled-castes-and-the-scheduled-tribes-prevention-of-atrocities-act"],"yoast_head":"\n'Bhangi, Neech, Bhikhari, Mangani are not caste names'; Rajasthan High Court set asides charges under SC\/ST Act | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Rajasthan High Court set aside charges under SC\/ST Act and held that 'Bhangi, Neech, Bhikhari, Mangani are not caste names'.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/16\/bhangi-neech-bhikhari-mangani-are-not-caste-names-rajasthan-high-court-set-asides-charges-under-sc-st-act-scc-times\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"\u2018Bhangi, Neech, Bhikhari, Mangani are not caste-based slurs\u2019; Rajasthan High Court set asides charges under SC\/ST Act\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Rajasthan High Court set aside charges under SC\/ST Act and held that 'Bhangi, Neech, Bhikhari, Mangani are not caste names'.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/16\/bhangi-neech-bhikhari-mangani-are-not-caste-names-rajasthan-high-court-set-asides-charges-under-sc-st-act-scc-times\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-11-16T08:30:19+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-11-20T05:53:22+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"591\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"\u2018Bhangi, Neech, Bhikhari, Mangani are not caste-based slurs\u2019; Rajasthan High Court set asides charges under SC\/ST Act\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/16\/bhangi-neech-bhikhari-mangani-are-not-caste-names-rajasthan-high-court-set-asides-charges-under-sc-st-act-scc-times\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/16\/bhangi-neech-bhikhari-mangani-are-not-caste-names-rajasthan-high-court-set-asides-charges-under-sc-st-act-scc-times\/\",\"name\":\"'Bhangi, Neech, Bhikhari, Mangani are not caste names'; Rajasthan High Court set asides charges under SC\/ST Act | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/16\/bhangi-neech-bhikhari-mangani-are-not-caste-names-rajasthan-high-court-set-asides-charges-under-sc-st-act-scc-times\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/16\/bhangi-neech-bhikhari-mangani-are-not-caste-names-rajasthan-high-court-set-asides-charges-under-sc-st-act-scc-times\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-11-16T08:30:19+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-11-20T05:53:22+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\"},\"description\":\"Rajasthan High Court set aside charges under SC\/ST Act and held that 'Bhangi, Neech, Bhikhari, Mangani are not caste names'.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/16\/bhangi-neech-bhikhari-mangani-are-not-caste-names-rajasthan-high-court-set-asides-charges-under-sc-st-act-scc-times\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/16\/bhangi-neech-bhikhari-mangani-are-not-caste-names-rajasthan-high-court-set-asides-charges-under-sc-st-act-scc-times\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/16\/bhangi-neech-bhikhari-mangani-are-not-caste-names-rajasthan-high-court-set-asides-charges-under-sc-st-act-scc-times\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp\",\"width\":887,\"height\":591,\"caption\":\"Rajasthan High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/16\/bhangi-neech-bhikhari-mangani-are-not-caste-names-rajasthan-high-court-set-asides-charges-under-sc-st-act-scc-times\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"\u2018Bhangi, Neech, Bhikhari, Mangani are not caste-based slurs\u2019; Rajasthan High Court set asides charges under SC\/ST Act\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\",\"name\":\"Ritu\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Ritu\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_7\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"'Bhangi, Neech, Bhikhari, Mangani are not caste names'; Rajasthan High Court set asides charges under SC\/ST Act | SCC Times","description":"Rajasthan High Court set aside charges under SC\/ST Act and held that 'Bhangi, Neech, Bhikhari, Mangani are not caste names'.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/16\/bhangi-neech-bhikhari-mangani-are-not-caste-names-rajasthan-high-court-set-asides-charges-under-sc-st-act-scc-times\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"\u2018Bhangi, Neech, Bhikhari, Mangani are not caste-based slurs\u2019; Rajasthan High Court set asides charges under SC\/ST Act","og_description":"Rajasthan High Court set aside charges under SC\/ST Act and held that 'Bhangi, Neech, Bhikhari, Mangani are not caste names'.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/16\/bhangi-neech-bhikhari-mangani-are-not-caste-names-rajasthan-high-court-set-asides-charges-under-sc-st-act-scc-times\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2024-11-16T08:30:19+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-11-20T05:53:22+00:00","og_image":[{"width":887,"height":591,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Ritu","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"\u2018Bhangi, Neech, Bhikhari, Mangani are not caste-based slurs\u2019; Rajasthan High Court set asides charges under SC\/ST Act","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Ritu","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/16\/bhangi-neech-bhikhari-mangani-are-not-caste-names-rajasthan-high-court-set-asides-charges-under-sc-st-act-scc-times\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/16\/bhangi-neech-bhikhari-mangani-are-not-caste-names-rajasthan-high-court-set-asides-charges-under-sc-st-act-scc-times\/","name":"'Bhangi, Neech, Bhikhari, Mangani are not caste names'; Rajasthan High Court set asides charges under SC\/ST Act | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/16\/bhangi-neech-bhikhari-mangani-are-not-caste-names-rajasthan-high-court-set-asides-charges-under-sc-st-act-scc-times\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/16\/bhangi-neech-bhikhari-mangani-are-not-caste-names-rajasthan-high-court-set-asides-charges-under-sc-st-act-scc-times\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp","datePublished":"2024-11-16T08:30:19+00:00","dateModified":"2024-11-20T05:53:22+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9"},"description":"Rajasthan High Court set aside charges under SC\/ST Act and held that 'Bhangi, Neech, Bhikhari, Mangani are not caste names'.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/16\/bhangi-neech-bhikhari-mangani-are-not-caste-names-rajasthan-high-court-set-asides-charges-under-sc-st-act-scc-times\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/16\/bhangi-neech-bhikhari-mangani-are-not-caste-names-rajasthan-high-court-set-asides-charges-under-sc-st-act-scc-times\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/16\/bhangi-neech-bhikhari-mangani-are-not-caste-names-rajasthan-high-court-set-asides-charges-under-sc-st-act-scc-times\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp","width":887,"height":591,"caption":"Rajasthan High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/16\/bhangi-neech-bhikhari-mangani-are-not-caste-names-rajasthan-high-court-set-asides-charges-under-sc-st-act-scc-times\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"\u2018Bhangi, Neech, Bhikhari, Mangani are not caste-based slurs\u2019; Rajasthan High Court set asides charges under SC\/ST Act"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9","name":"Ritu","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Ritu"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_7\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":373252,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/20\/complainant-testimony-alone-sufficient-to-sustain-charges-under-sc-st-act-ker-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":335319,"position":0},"title":"Mere statement of aggrieved person disclosing prima facie ingredients of the offence sufficient to sustain charges under SC\/ST Act: Kerala HC","author":"Sunaina","date":"January 20, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cJust because the witnesses\u2019 statements do not disclose any overt act, that by itself would not be a ground to discharge the accused as law does not insist plenty of witnesses to prove an offence and the evidence of a solitary wholly reliable witness would suffice the purpose.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"charges under SCST Act","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/charges-under-SCST-Act.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/charges-under-SCST-Act.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/charges-under-SCST-Act.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/charges-under-SCST-Act.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":283445,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/08\/karnataka-hc-holds-sc-st-act-only-operative-when-intention-to-insult-present-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":335319,"position":1},"title":"Karnataka HC | Charges under Prevention of SC\/ ST (Atrocities) Act are applicable only when name of a victim’s caste is taken with the intention to insult and humiliate them","author":"Editor","date":"February 8, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Karnataka High Court held that merely mentioning an individual's caste during an altercation with no intention to insult, would not attract the provisions of the SC\/ ST Act","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Karnataka High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-424.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":238605,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/05\/casteism-is-obstruction-abuse-by-upper-caste-person-due-to-property-dispute-an-offence-under-sc-st-act-not-in-all-cases-says-sc\/","url_meta":{"origin":335319,"position":2},"title":"Is obstruction & abuse by upper caste person due to property dispute an offence under SC\/ST Act? Not in all cases, says SC","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"November 5, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: In a case where abuses were hurled by a person of upper caste at a person belonging to Scheduled Caste due to a property dispute between them, the 3-judge bench of L. Nageswara Rao, Hemant Gupta* and Ajay Rastogi, JJ has held that no offence under Section 3(1)(r)\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":377634,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/07\/guj-hc-held-not-every-insult-offence-under-sc-st-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":335319,"position":3},"title":"Gujarat High Court: Not every insult or intimidation amounts to an offence under SC ST Act","author":"Prarthana Gupta","date":"March 7, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cFrom the allegations made in the complaint, the prosecution has not proved that the accused is guilty of an offence under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"not every insult offence under SCST Act","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/not-every-insult-offence-under-SCST-Act.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/not-every-insult-offence-under-SCST-Act.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/not-every-insult-offence-under-SCST-Act.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/not-every-insult-offence-under-SCST-Act.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":298578,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/04\/madras-high-court-directs-state-provide-employment-sc-woman-brother-killed-caste-based-murder\/","url_meta":{"origin":335319,"position":4},"title":"Madras High Court directs State to provide employment to woman whose brother was victim of caste-based murder","author":"Apoorva","date":"August 4, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Madras High Court rejected the argument that compensation has been already paid to the petitioner, thus the question of providing employment to the surviving daughter will not arise, as the petitioner is relying upon the provision of a Special Act.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"madras high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/madras-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/madras-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/madras-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/madras-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":230332,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/06\/01\/ph-hc-no-offence-constituted-under-sc-st-act-where-abusive-language-in-the-name-of-caste-used-over-phone-call-criminal-proceedings-against-accused-quashed\/","url_meta":{"origin":335319,"position":5},"title":"P&H HC | No offence constituted under SC\/ST Act where abusive language in the name of caste used over phone call: Criminal proceedings against accused quashed","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"June 1, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Punjab and Haryana High Court:\u00a0Harnaresh Singh Gill, J.,quashed the criminal proceedings against the appellant accused of using abusive language against the complainant over a phone call in the name of his caste. Petitions were filed against the order passed by Additional Sessions Judge (Exclusive Court for Heinous Crime against Women),\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/335319","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67514"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=335319"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/335319\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/314824"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=335319"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=335319"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=335319"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}