{"id":334660,"date":"2024-11-08T09:00:19","date_gmt":"2024-11-08T03:30:19","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=334660"},"modified":"2024-11-08T09:29:09","modified_gmt":"2024-11-08T03:59:09","slug":"2024-scc-vol-9-part-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/08\/2024-scc-vol-9-part-2\/","title":{"rendered":"2024 SCC Vol. 9 Part 2"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<div style=\"background-color: #e6eeff; border-bottom: 1px solid black; border-bottom-style: dashed;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726944\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Civil Procedure Code, 1908<\/a> &#8212; S. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001523758\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">20<\/a> &#8212; Civil suit &#8212; Maintainability &#8212; Issue of territorial jurisdiction &#8212; Adjudication of, as preliminary issue &#8212; Necessity of:<\/span> The question of territorial jurisdiction should ordinarily be decided at the outset rather than being deferred till all matters are resolved, [<span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Arcadia Shipping Ltd. v. Tata Steel Ltd.<\/span>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9002370719\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(2024) 9 SCC 374<\/a>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"border-bottom: 1px solid black; border-bottom-style: dashed;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Constitution of India<\/a> &#8212; Art. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001574969\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">226<\/a> &#8212; Habeas corpus &#8212; Custody of minor child:<\/span> Propositions of settled law that need to be kept in mind while granting custody of minor child, summarized, [<span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Somprabha Rana v. State of M.P.<\/span>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9002370720\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(2024) 9 SCC 382<\/a>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"background-color: #e6eeff; border-bottom: 1px solid black; border-bottom-style: dashed;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Consumer Protection &#8212; Services &#8212; Housing and Real Estate:<\/span> Contractual obligations of deceased developer\/builder under a contract based on individual&#8217;s skills, competency or other qualifications is not imposable, on legal heirs of developer\/promisor. Personal rights\/obligations and proprietary rights, distinguished between, [<span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Vinayak Purshottam Dube v. Jayashree Padamkar Bhat<\/span>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9002370722\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(2024) 9 SCC 398<\/a>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"border-bottom: 1px solid black; border-bottom-style: dashed;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Election &#8212; Election Petition\/Trial &#8212; Practice and Procedure for Election Trial &#8212; Pleadings and particulars &#8212; Contents\/Material facts\/Full particulars &#8212; Subsequent Pleadings\/Replication\/Rejoinder &#8212; Replication &#8212; Permissibility:<\/span> High Court acting as Election Tribunal vested with powers of civil court under CPC, and hence, in exercise of power under Or. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001523661\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">8 R. 9<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726944\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">CPC<\/a> empowered to grant leave to election petitioner to file replication. However, such leave cannot be granted mechanically and Court must consider averments in election petition, written statement and replication. While considering grant of leave, Court must bear in mind that: (i) replication is not needed to merely traverse facts pleaded in written statement; (ii) replication not a substitute for amendment; and (iii) new cause of action or plea inconsistent with plea in original petition cannot be permitted in replication. Material facts and particulars as to commission of alleged corrupt practice required to be given in election petition and not in replication filed much after expiry of period of limitation for filing election petition, [<span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Noorul Hassan v. Nahakpam Indrajit Singh<\/span>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9002370718\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(2024) 9 SCC 353<\/a>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"background-color: #e6eeff; border-bottom: 1px solid black; border-bottom-style: dashed;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002955939\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Income Tax Act, 1961<\/a> &#8212; S. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001559514\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">206-C(6)<\/a> r\/w Expln. (a)(iii) &#8212; Collection of income tax at source from liquor vendors (contractors) in Karnataka &#8212; Non-requirement of:<\/span> Liquor vendors (contractors) who bought vending rights in auction cannot be considered, as &#8220;buyer&#8221; within the meaning of Expln. (a) to S. 206-C. Law clarified on satisfaction of twin conditions of exclusion from the meaning of &#8220;buyer&#8221;, [<span style=\"font-style: italic;\">CIT v. Mysore Sales International Ltd.<\/span>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9002370723\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(2024) 9 SCC 415<\/a>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"border-bottom: 1px solid black; border-bottom-style: dashed;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726957\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881<\/a> &#8212; Ss. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001544366\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">138<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001544367\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">139<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001544343\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">118<\/a> &#8212; Dishonour of cheques &#8212; Acquittal of accused &#8212; Validity:<\/span> In absence of evidence not showing enforceable debt or other liability, acquittal in cheque dishonour case, affirmed, [<span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Rajco Steel Enterprises v. Kavita Saraff<\/span>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9002370721\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(2024) 9 SCC 390<\/a>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"background-color: #e6eeff; border-bottom: 1px solid black; border-bottom-style: dashed;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Penal Code, 1860<\/a> &#8212; Ss. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561607\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">302<\/a>\/<a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561409\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">149<\/a> and S. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561408\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">148<\/a> &#8212; Unlawful assembly and murder &#8212; Liability of appellant &#8212; Determination of:<\/span> Law summarized on principles for conviction on basis of constructive liability under S. 149. Absence of factum of causing injury and mere role of firing from a pistol into the air to frighten the eyewitnesses, when they attempted to save the deceased, held, not enough to exculpate appellant, as all requirements of S. 149 stood satisfied. Hence, his conviction under Ss. 302\/149 and S. 148 confirmed, [<span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Nitya Nand v. State of U.P.<\/span>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9002370715\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(2024) 9 SCC 314<\/a>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"border-bottom: 1px solid black; border-bottom-style: dashed;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002776234\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Railways Act, 1989<\/a> &#8212; S. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001543213\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">106<\/a> &#8212; Charge on the basis of incorrect chargeable distance notified:<\/span> Charge levied by Railways on basis of incorrect chargeable distance is illegal charge. Concepts of overcharge and illegal charge, explained and distinguished<\/span>,<span style=\"Times New Roman&quot;;\"> [<\/span><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Union of India v. Indian Oil Corpn. Ltd.<\/span>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9002370714\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(2024) 9 SCC 241<\/a>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"background-color: #e6eeff; border-bottom: 1px solid black; border-bottom-style: dashed;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Service Law &#8212; Pension &#8212; Entitlement to pension &#8212; Prerequisites &#8212; Compliance &#8212; Necessity:<\/span> Pension is a constitutional right and not bounty, which an employee is entitled on his superannuation. However, pension can be claimed only when it is permissible under relevant rules and scheme &#8212; Where employee is covered under Provident Fund scheme and not holding pensionable post, he cannot claim pension, [<span style=\"font-style: italic;\">U.P. Roadways Retired Officials &amp; Officers Assn. v. State of U.P.<\/span>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9002370717\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(2024) 9 SCC 331<\/a>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"border-bottom: 1px solid black; border-bottom-style: dashed;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Service Law &#8212; Regularisation &#8212; Entitlement to regularization:<\/span> Essence of employment and rights thereof cannot be merely determined by initial terms of appointment when actual course of employment has evolved significantly over time, [<span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Vinod Kumar v. Union of India<\/span>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9002370716\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(2024) 9 SCC 327<\/a>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p><i>Civil Procedure Code, 1908 \u2014 S. 20 \u2014 Civil suit \u2014 Maintainability \u2014 Issue of territorial jurisdiction \u2014 Adjudication of, as preliminary issue<\/i><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":334668,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[5,16],"tags":[75011,39496,11241,36880,23574,75012,3118,51086,5941,15071],"class_list":["post-334660","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casesreported","category-supremecourtcases","tag-2024-scc-vol-9-part-2","tag-civil-procedure-code-1908","tag-consumer-protection","tag-custody-of-minor-child","tag-dishonour-of-cheques","tag-election-trial","tag-Habeas_Corpus","tag-income-tax-act-1961","tag-service-law","tag-unlawful-assembly"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>2024 SCC Vol. 9 Part 2 | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Civil Procedure Code, 1908 \u2014 S. 20 \u2014 Civil suit \u2014 Maintainability \u2014 Issue of territorial jurisdiction \u2014 Adjudication of, as preliminary issue\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/08\/2024-scc-vol-9-part-2\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"2024 SCC Vol. 9 Part 2\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Civil Procedure Code, 1908 \u2014 S. 20 \u2014 Civil suit \u2014 Maintainability \u2014 Issue of territorial jurisdiction \u2014 Adjudication of, as preliminary issue\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/08\/2024-scc-vol-9-part-2\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-11-08T03:30:19+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-11-08T03:59:09+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/2024-SCC-Vol.-9-Part-2.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"2024 SCC Vol. 9 Part 2\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/08\/2024-scc-vol-9-part-2\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/08\/2024-scc-vol-9-part-2\/\",\"name\":\"2024 SCC Vol. 9 Part 2 | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/08\/2024-scc-vol-9-part-2\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/08\/2024-scc-vol-9-part-2\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/2024-SCC-Vol.-9-Part-2.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-11-08T03:30:19+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-11-08T03:59:09+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"description\":\"Civil Procedure Code, 1908 \u2014 S. 20 \u2014 Civil suit \u2014 Maintainability \u2014 Issue of territorial jurisdiction \u2014 Adjudication of, as preliminary issue\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/08\/2024-scc-vol-9-part-2\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/08\/2024-scc-vol-9-part-2\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/08\/2024-scc-vol-9-part-2\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/2024-SCC-Vol.-9-Part-2.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/2024-SCC-Vol.-9-Part-2.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"2024 SCC Vol. 9 Part 2\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/08\/2024-scc-vol-9-part-2\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"2024 SCC Vol. 9 Part 2\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"2024 SCC Vol. 9 Part 2 | SCC Times","description":"Civil Procedure Code, 1908 \u2014 S. 20 \u2014 Civil suit \u2014 Maintainability \u2014 Issue of territorial jurisdiction \u2014 Adjudication of, as preliminary issue","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/08\/2024-scc-vol-9-part-2\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"2024 SCC Vol. 9 Part 2","og_description":"Civil Procedure Code, 1908 \u2014 S. 20 \u2014 Civil suit \u2014 Maintainability \u2014 Issue of territorial jurisdiction \u2014 Adjudication of, as preliminary issue","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/08\/2024-scc-vol-9-part-2\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2024-11-08T03:30:19+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-11-08T03:59:09+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/2024-SCC-Vol.-9-Part-2.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"2024 SCC Vol. 9 Part 2","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/08\/2024-scc-vol-9-part-2\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/08\/2024-scc-vol-9-part-2\/","name":"2024 SCC Vol. 9 Part 2 | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/08\/2024-scc-vol-9-part-2\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/08\/2024-scc-vol-9-part-2\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/2024-SCC-Vol.-9-Part-2.webp","datePublished":"2024-11-08T03:30:19+00:00","dateModified":"2024-11-08T03:59:09+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"description":"Civil Procedure Code, 1908 \u2014 S. 20 \u2014 Civil suit \u2014 Maintainability \u2014 Issue of territorial jurisdiction \u2014 Adjudication of, as preliminary issue","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/08\/2024-scc-vol-9-part-2\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/08\/2024-scc-vol-9-part-2\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/08\/2024-scc-vol-9-part-2\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/2024-SCC-Vol.-9-Part-2.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/2024-SCC-Vol.-9-Part-2.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"2024 SCC Vol. 9 Part 2"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/08\/2024-scc-vol-9-part-2\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"2024 SCC Vol. 9 Part 2"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/2024-SCC-Vol.-9-Part-2.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":326100,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/09\/sikkim-hc-cpc-preliminary-issue-mixed-question-of-law-and-facts-or-14-r-2-discrepancy-facts\/","url_meta":{"origin":334660,"position":0},"title":"Or. 14 R. 2 of CPC does not confer jurisdiction on the Court to decide a mixed question of fact and law, unless the facts are clear from the plaint itself: Sikkim HC","author":"Editor","date":"July 9, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court decided under the aegis of Or.14, R.2 of the CPC that where a question of law is dependent on the determination of a question of fact, then such question of fact cannot be decided as a preliminary issue by the Trial Court.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Sikkim High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/Sikkim-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/Sikkim-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/Sikkim-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/Sikkim-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":238479,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/04\/2020-scc-vol-6-part-3\/","url_meta":{"origin":334660,"position":1},"title":"2020 SCC Vol. 6 Part 3","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 4, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Civil Procedure Code, 1908 \u2014 S. 9-A [as inserted by CPC (Maharashtra Amendment) Act, 1977]: Objection as to jurisdiction to entertain suit, to be decided by the court as a preliminary issue under S. 9-A. The word \u201cjurisdiction\u201d in S. 9-A, does not include issue of bar of limitation. The\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Cases Reported&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Cases Reported","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casesreported\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/01\/SCC-weekly-7-Jan-2018.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/01\/SCC-weekly-7-Jan-2018.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/01\/SCC-weekly-7-Jan-2018.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/01\/SCC-weekly-7-Jan-2018.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/01\/SCC-weekly-7-Jan-2018.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":323350,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/01\/2024-scc-vol-4-part-5\/","url_meta":{"origin":334660,"position":2},"title":"2024 SCC Vol. 4 Part 5","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"June 1, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 \u2014 Ss. 34 and 37 r\/w Ss. 2(4) and 16 \u2014 Jurisdiction of arbitrator to adjudicate under the 1996 Act: Challenge to jurisdiction of arbitrator to adjudicate under the 1996 Act, under S. 34 on account of the 1983 Adhiniyam, post rendering of award is\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Cases Reported&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Cases Reported","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casesreported\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"2024 SCC Vol. 4 Part 5","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/2024-SCC-Vol.-4-Part-5.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/2024-SCC-Vol.-4-Part-5.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/2024-SCC-Vol.-4-Part-5.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/2024-SCC-Vol.-4-Part-5.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":222054,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/13\/section-9-a-of-the-civil-procedure-code-understanding-jurisdiction-a-coat-of-many-colours\/","url_meta":{"origin":334660,"position":3},"title":"Section 9-A of the Civil Procedure Code: Understanding Jurisdiction, A Coat of many colours","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 13, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"by Ankoosh Mehta (Partner), Dhvani Shah (Senior Associate) and Sanika Gokhale (Associate), Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/experts_corner\/law-firm\/cam\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/Cyril-Amarchand-CAM.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/Cyril-Amarchand-CAM.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/Cyril-Amarchand-CAM.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/Cyril-Amarchand-CAM.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/Cyril-Amarchand-CAM.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":273795,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/16\/2022-scc-vol-8-part-1\/","url_meta":{"origin":334660,"position":4},"title":"2022 SCC Vol. 8 Part 1","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 16, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 \u2014 Ss. 8, 11, 7, 2(1)(h), 16 and 45 \u2014 Non-signatory or non-party to arbitration agreement: Arbitration against, or by non-signatory or non-party to arbitration agreement, when may be invoked, discussed. The scope, ambit and validity of Group of Companies doctrine, explained. Doubting\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Cases Reported&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Cases Reported","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casesreported\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"SCC Part","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/NEW-SCC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/NEW-SCC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/NEW-SCC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/NEW-SCC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/NEW-SCC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":273300,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/09\/2022-scc-vol-7-part-5\/","url_meta":{"origin":334660,"position":5},"title":"2022 SCC Vol. 7 Part 5","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 9, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 \u2014 S. 17 \u2014 Interim measures \u2014 Termination of lease: Interim direction by arbitrator to lessee to deposit rental amount for period of : (a) complete closure, and (b) partial closure of the premises run as a restaurant and bar, during COVID-19 Lockdown,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Cases Reported&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Cases Reported","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casesreported\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"SCC Part","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/NEW-SCC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/NEW-SCC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/NEW-SCC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/NEW-SCC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/NEW-SCC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/334660","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=334660"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/334660\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/334668"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=334660"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=334660"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=334660"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}