{"id":334639,"date":"2024-11-07T16:00:17","date_gmt":"2024-11-07T10:30:17","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=334639"},"modified":"2024-11-14T10:00:56","modified_gmt":"2024-11-14T04:30:56","slug":"delhi-hc-grants-ex-parte-ad-interim-injunction-skechers-south-asia-protection-32-year-old-trade-mark-legal-news","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/07\/delhi-hc-grants-ex-parte-ad-interim-injunction-skechers-south-asia-protection-32-year-old-trade-mark-legal-news\/","title":{"rendered":"Delhi High Court grants ex-parte ad interim<\/span> injunction to Skechers South Asia Pvt. Ltd. for protection of 32-year-old Trade Mark"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Delhi High Court:<\/span> In a suit filed by Skechers South Asia Private Limited (‘Skechers’) to seek permanent injunction for restraining the defendants from infringing their trade marks and copyright and passing off goods as those of Skechers along with other ancillary reliefs, a Single Judge Bench of Amit Bansal, J. granted an ex-parte ad interim<\/span> injunction to Skechers and restrained the defendants from using the impugned trade mark or artistic works till the next date of hearing.<\/p>\n

Background<\/h3>\n

Skechers is involved in designing, developing, and marketing uniquely and distinctively designed lifestyle footwear, apparels, and accessories. Skechers submitted that the trade mark ‘SKECHERS’ was adopted by them in 1992 for use in regards to footwear and other goods\/services, and that the trade mark was also used as a corporate name, trade name, and trading style by them.<\/p>\n

Skechers submitted that in the second week of October 2024, an officer of the investigating agency hired by them came across infringing\/counterfeit products bearing Skechers’ trade marks and artistic works which were being manufactured\/sold by defendants 1 to 3. All three defendants were found to be dealing in footwear and other articles.<\/p>\n

Skechers submitted that they had examined the impugned goods and based on the quality of the product, the material used, etc. it was clear that the same did not originate from Skechers and the said goods were a clear imitation of their goods and were counterfeits\/lookalikes bearing Skechers’ trade mark and artistic works.<\/p>\n

Skechers averred that the defendants were connected to each other as they operated in a clandestine manner and the source of the impugned goods also appeared to be common. It was also mentioned that upon checking the website of the Trade Marks Registry, they did not come across any application\/registration filed by the defendants.<\/p>\n

Analysis and Decision<\/h3>\n

The Court said that it was clear that the defendants were using identical trade mark as that of Skechers for identical products and an attempt was made by the defendants to create an impression that the products being sold were connected to Skechers. Thus, the Court said that a prima facie<\/span> case was made out on behalf of Skechers.<\/p>\n

The Court stated that the balance of convenience was in favour of Skechers and an irreparable injury would be caused to them if the defendants continued using the impugned marks. It was said that prejudice would also be caused to the public as the marks of the defendants were deceptively similar to that of Skechers and were likely to cause confusion in the market.<\/p>\n

Consequently, the Court restrained the defendants from using or causing to be used Skechers’ trade marks and artistic works or any other mark or artistic work identical or similar to Skechers’ in relation to the impugned goods or any goods, from manufacturing, marketing, or offering for sale any goods bearing Skechers’ trade marks or artistic works so as to infringe Skechers’ trade marks and copyright, and from passing off or enabling others to pass off the defendants’ impugned goods as being those of Skechers till the next date of hearing.<\/p>\n

The Court directed the defendants to give complete disclosure of information and documents to reveal the details of other printer(s) who would have the blocks, dyes, stencils, or other machinery to print the infringing labels, details of other manufacturers\/packers of the goods bearing Skechers’ trade mark, details of the people for whom Skechers’ trade marks and artistic works had been manufactured and sold, and the defendants’ assets.<\/p>\n

The Court noted that Skechers had sought appointment of Local Commissioners to seize the infringing goods and said that the very purpose of grant of ex parte ad interim<\/span> injunction would be defeated if the defendants are given notice under Order XXXIX Rule 3<\/a> of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908<\/a> (‘CPC’) before the execution of commission. Thus, the Court directed Skechers to serve the said notice at the time of execution of the commission which was directed to be within two weeks.<\/p>\n

The application has been listed on 24-02-2025.<\/p>\n

Further, another interim application filed under Order XXVI Rules 9<\/a> of CPC<\/a> to seek the appointment of Local Commissioners for seizure of all infringing goods was allowed and the Local Commissioners were directed to make an inventory of and take into custody all finished and unfinished impugned goods, all materials bearing Skechers’ trade marks and artistic works, and business records related to the business conducted under Skechers’ mark.<\/p>\n

The Local Commissioners were also directed to handover the same on ‘superdari<\/span>’ to the defendants after they gave an undertaking that the same would be produced before the Court as and when directed. The Court directed the defendants and their representatives to provide full assistance to the Local Commissioners to execute the present proceedings.<\/p>\n

The Local Commissioners were directed to be permitted to enter upon the defendant’s premises to conduct the search and seizure and to make copies of the business records including documentary and electronic material discovered from the premises. The defendants were directed to grant the Local Commissioners access to the computer systems.<\/p>\n

The Local Commissioners were permitted to take photographs\/videos of the premises along with the impugned products and to break open the locks in case of resistance by the defendants. Further, the SHO of the local police station and the DCP concerned were directed to render necessary protection to the Local Commissioner, if and when sought.<\/p>\n

Lastly, the Local Commissioners were directed to file their reports within two weeks of executing the commission and the application was disposed of.<\/p>\n

[Skechers South Asia Pvt. Ltd. v. Delhi Polymer, 2024 SCC OnLine Del 7669<\/a>, Decided on 25-10-2024<\/span>]<\/p>\n\n

Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n

For Plaintiff —<\/span> Sr. Advocate Chander M. Lall, Advocate Smriti Yadav, Advocate Kshitij Parashar, Advocate Gautam Wadhwa, Advocate Vanshika Thapliyal, Advocate Annanya Mehan, Advocate Abhinav Bhalla<\/p>\n

For Defendants —<\/span> N\/a<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The infringers were restrained from using Skechers’ trade mark and artistic works or any other trade mark or artistic work identical or similar to Skechers, till the next date of hearing.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67517,"featured_media":314886,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[9271,2543,52958,27643,70893,75008,2616],"class_list":["post-334639","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-copyright","tag-Delhi_High_Court","tag-ex-parte-ad-interim-injunction","tag-intellectual-property","tag-justice-amit-bansal","tag-skechers","tag-Trade_Mark"],"yoast_head":"\nDelhi HC grants ex-parte ad interim injunction to Skechers for protection of 32-year-old Trade Mark | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Delhi High Court grants ex-parte ad interim injunction to Skechers South Asia Pvt. Ltd. for protection of 32-year-old Trade Mark\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/07\/delhi-hc-grants-ex-parte-ad-interim-injunction-skechers-south-asia-protection-32-year-old-trade-mark-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Delhi High Court grants ex-parte ad interim injunction to Skechers South Asia Pvt. Ltd. for protection of 32-year-old Trade Mark\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Delhi High Court grants ex-parte ad interim injunction to Skechers South Asia Pvt. Ltd. for protection of 32-year-old Trade Mark\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/07\/delhi-hc-grants-ex-parte-ad-interim-injunction-skechers-south-asia-protection-32-year-old-trade-mark-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-11-07T10:30:17+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-11-14T04:30:56+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"591\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Delhi High Court grants <span style="font-style: italic;">ex-parte ad interim<\/span> injunction to Skechers South Asia Pvt. Ltd. for protection of 32-year-old Trade Mark\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/07\/delhi-hc-grants-ex-parte-ad-interim-injunction-skechers-south-asia-protection-32-year-old-trade-mark-legal-news\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/07\/delhi-hc-grants-ex-parte-ad-interim-injunction-skechers-south-asia-protection-32-year-old-trade-mark-legal-news\/\",\"name\":\"Delhi HC grants ex-parte ad interim injunction to Skechers for protection of 32-year-old Trade Mark | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/07\/delhi-hc-grants-ex-parte-ad-interim-injunction-skechers-south-asia-protection-32-year-old-trade-mark-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/07\/delhi-hc-grants-ex-parte-ad-interim-injunction-skechers-south-asia-protection-32-year-old-trade-mark-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-11-07T10:30:17+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-11-14T04:30:56+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84913f82186a8dea042dc300d5751624\"},\"description\":\"Delhi High Court grants ex-parte ad interim injunction to Skechers South Asia Pvt. Ltd. for protection of 32-year-old Trade Mark\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/07\/delhi-hc-grants-ex-parte-ad-interim-injunction-skechers-south-asia-protection-32-year-old-trade-mark-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/07\/delhi-hc-grants-ex-parte-ad-interim-injunction-skechers-south-asia-protection-32-year-old-trade-mark-legal-news\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/07\/delhi-hc-grants-ex-parte-ad-interim-injunction-skechers-south-asia-protection-32-year-old-trade-mark-legal-news\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp\",\"width\":887,\"height\":591,\"caption\":\"Delhi High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/07\/delhi-hc-grants-ex-parte-ad-interim-injunction-skechers-south-asia-protection-32-year-old-trade-mark-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Delhi High Court grants ex-parte ad interim injunction to Skechers South Asia Pvt. Ltd. for protection of 32-year-old Trade Mark\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84913f82186a8dea042dc300d5751624\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d822f35f9fcd11386aa47345cde7945e45a64da7205eebe9784f21d0cd223603?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d822f35f9fcd11386aa47345cde7945e45a64da7205eebe9784f21d0cd223603?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc-online-editor\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Delhi HC grants ex-parte ad interim injunction to Skechers for protection of 32-year-old Trade Mark | SCC Times","description":"Delhi High Court grants ex-parte ad interim injunction to Skechers South Asia Pvt. Ltd. for protection of 32-year-old Trade Mark","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/07\/delhi-hc-grants-ex-parte-ad-interim-injunction-skechers-south-asia-protection-32-year-old-trade-mark-legal-news\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Delhi High Court grants ex-parte ad interim injunction to Skechers South Asia Pvt. Ltd. for protection of 32-year-old Trade Mark","og_description":"Delhi High Court grants ex-parte ad interim injunction to Skechers South Asia Pvt. Ltd. for protection of 32-year-old Trade Mark","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/07\/delhi-hc-grants-ex-parte-ad-interim-injunction-skechers-south-asia-protection-32-year-old-trade-mark-legal-news\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2024-11-07T10:30:17+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-11-14T04:30:56+00:00","og_image":[{"width":887,"height":591,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Delhi High Court grants <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">ex-parte ad interim<\/span> injunction to Skechers South Asia Pvt. Ltd. for protection of 32-year-old Trade Mark","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/07\/delhi-hc-grants-ex-parte-ad-interim-injunction-skechers-south-asia-protection-32-year-old-trade-mark-legal-news\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/07\/delhi-hc-grants-ex-parte-ad-interim-injunction-skechers-south-asia-protection-32-year-old-trade-mark-legal-news\/","name":"Delhi HC grants ex-parte ad interim injunction to Skechers for protection of 32-year-old Trade Mark | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/07\/delhi-hc-grants-ex-parte-ad-interim-injunction-skechers-south-asia-protection-32-year-old-trade-mark-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/07\/delhi-hc-grants-ex-parte-ad-interim-injunction-skechers-south-asia-protection-32-year-old-trade-mark-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp","datePublished":"2024-11-07T10:30:17+00:00","dateModified":"2024-11-14T04:30:56+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84913f82186a8dea042dc300d5751624"},"description":"Delhi High Court grants ex-parte ad interim injunction to Skechers South Asia Pvt. Ltd. for protection of 32-year-old Trade Mark","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/07\/delhi-hc-grants-ex-parte-ad-interim-injunction-skechers-south-asia-protection-32-year-old-trade-mark-legal-news\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/07\/delhi-hc-grants-ex-parte-ad-interim-injunction-skechers-south-asia-protection-32-year-old-trade-mark-legal-news\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/07\/delhi-hc-grants-ex-parte-ad-interim-injunction-skechers-south-asia-protection-32-year-old-trade-mark-legal-news\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp","width":887,"height":591,"caption":"Delhi High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/07\/delhi-hc-grants-ex-parte-ad-interim-injunction-skechers-south-asia-protection-32-year-old-trade-mark-legal-news\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Delhi High Court grants ex-parte ad interim injunction to Skechers South Asia Pvt. Ltd. for protection of 32-year-old Trade Mark"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84913f82186a8dea042dc300d5751624","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d822f35f9fcd11386aa47345cde7945e45a64da7205eebe9784f21d0cd223603?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d822f35f9fcd11386aa47345cde7945e45a64da7205eebe9784f21d0cd223603?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc-online-editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":364760,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/25\/bom-hc-grants-ex-parte-relief-to-skechers-in-trade-mark-case\/","url_meta":{"origin":334639,"position":0},"title":"Bombay HC grants ex-parte injunction to Skechers in trade mark and copyright dispute over counterfeit goods","author":"Editor","date":"October 25, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe Court Receiver was directed to visit and search all premises of the defendants, forcibly breaking open locks if necessary and taking police assistance where required to seize and seal all offending goods.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"ex-parte relief to Skechers","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/ex-parte-relief-to-Skechers.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/ex-parte-relief-to-Skechers.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/ex-parte-relief-to-Skechers.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/ex-parte-relief-to-Skechers.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":281267,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/09\/delhi-high-court-confirms-ex-parte-ad-interim-injunction-favour-aiwa-japan-company-mark-in-trade-mark-infringement-suit-legal-research-updates-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":334639,"position":1},"title":"Delhi High Court confirms ex-parte ad interim injunction in favour of AIWA Co. Ltd., a Japan company for its mark \u201cAIWA\u201d in a trade mark infringement suit","author":"Editor","date":"January 9, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Delhi High Court held that the use of mark \u201cAIVVA\u201d by Aivva Enterprises (P) Ltd. was phonetically similar to the mark \u201cAIWA\u201d of Aiwa Co. Ltd. and thus, caused confusion in the market. Therefore, the Court confirmed ex-parte ad interim injunction in favour of the mark \u201cAIWA\u201d in a\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-418.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":280579,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/29\/delhi-high-court-grants-permanent-injunction-to-rpg-enterprises-ltd-for-its-mark-rpg-in-a-trade-mark-infringement-suit-awards-rs-3-lakhs-as-damages\/","url_meta":{"origin":334639,"position":2},"title":"Delhi High Court grants permanent injunction to RPG Enterprises Ltd. for its mark \u2018RPG\u2019 in a trade mark infringement suit; awards Rs. 3 lakhs as damages","author":"Editor","date":"December 29, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction to RPG Enterprises Ltd. for its mark \u2018RPG\u2019. Further, RPG Developers (P) Ltd. were restrained from offering\/rendering any services using the impugned trade mark \u2018RPG\u2019 and\/or \u2018RPG DEVELOPERS\u2019 and\/or artistic work which was a colourable imitation of the plaintiff's artistic work or any\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-418.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":278667,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/21\/delhi-high-court-grants-ex-parte-ad-interim-injunction-to-american-eagle-against-ektarfa-garments-in-a-trademark-and-copyright-infringement-suit\/","url_meta":{"origin":334639,"position":3},"title":"Delhi High Court grants ex-parte ad-interim injunction to American Eagle against Ektarfa Garments in a trademark and copyright infringement suit","author":"Editor","date":"November 21, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Delhi High Court: In a case where application was filed under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 read with Section 51 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (Code) in a trademark and copyright infringement suit, the Single Judge Bench of Jyoti Singh, J. Passed an Order granting ex-parte\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":278074,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/26\/delhi-high-court-grants-ex-parte-ad-interim-injunction-to-tata-sia-airlines-limited-in-a-trade-mark-infringement-suit-restrains-vistara-media-private-limited-from-using-the-mark-vistara\/","url_meta":{"origin":334639,"position":4},"title":"Delhi High Court grants ex-parte ad-interim injunction to Tata Sia Airlines Limited in a trade mark infringement suit; restrains Vistara Media Private Limited from using the mark \u2018VISTARA\u2019","author":"Editor","date":"November 26, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Delhi High Court: In a case where Tata Sia Airlines Limited filed an application under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 of CPC for grant of an ex-parte ad-interim injunction, the Single Judge Bench of Jyoti Singh, J. passed an interim order restraining Vistara Media Private Limited from\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/Delhi-High-Court-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":334324,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/03\/bomhc-grants-interim-injunction-in-favour-of-sketchers-in-trade-mark-infringement-case\/","url_meta":{"origin":334639,"position":5},"title":"Bombay HC grants interim injunction in favour of Sketchers in trade mark infringement case against Wardrode","author":"Simranjeet","date":"November 3, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The adoption of plaintiffs\u2019 trade marks and plaintiffs\u2019 artistic works in relation to the impugned goods by defendants is dishonest.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Bombay High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/334639","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67517"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=334639"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/334639\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/314886"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=334639"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=334639"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=334639"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}