{"id":334177,"date":"2024-10-30T16:00:17","date_gmt":"2024-10-30T10:30:17","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=334177"},"modified":"2024-11-07T11:15:15","modified_gmt":"2024-11-07T05:45:15","slug":"bomhc-quashes-fir-against-go-airs-former-md-ceo-allegedly-involved-in-sending-confidential-information","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/30\/bomhc-quashes-fir-against-go-airs-former-md-ceo-allegedly-involved-in-sending-confidential-information\/","title":{"rendered":"Bombay HC quashes FIR against Go Air\u2019s former MD\/CEO allegedly involved in sending confidential information in emails"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Bombay High Court:<\/span> The present petition sought quashing of FIR registered on 08-02-2018 against petitioner, an Austrian National, based on the complaint lodged by Respondent 2-the Deputy General Manager, on behalf of Go Airlines India Ltd., for which petitioner was working initially as Chief Executive Officer and thereafter was promoted as Managing Director but had resigned on 31-08-2017. The Division Bench of Bharati Dangre and Manjusha Deshpande, JJ., opined that it did not find any material to show that petitioner was dishonestly or fraudulently sending Company&#8217;s confidential information to his personal email ID and to third party email ID. Thus, the Court quashed and set aside the FIR, as it failed to make out an offence against petitioner under Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001540620\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">43(b)<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001540650\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">66<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002796572\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Information Technology Act, 2000<\/a> (&#8216;the IT Act, 2000&#8217;).<\/p>\n<h3>Background<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Petitioner, as per the Employment Agreement, was under an obligation to work with the company for period of six months after his resignation, but he made a request to the Company&#8217;s Chairman to be relieved from his duties by 16-09-2017 and thus, he was relieved on 15-12-2017. As per the Company&#8217;s Internal Policy and Regulations, it was imperative for petitioner to return the devices used by him for conducting the Company&#8217;s business in the capacity as Managing Director, including the laptop, mobile phone, and all other confidential information.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">On 18-12-2017, petitioner received a letter from Go Air&#8217;s Vice President (Legal), accusing him of sending confidential information from his official ID to his personal ID, i.e., wolfgang.prockschauer@gmail.com and to the email ID of the third party, that is, martina.flitsch@jarolim.at. Petitioner was also accused of formatting the data on his iPad, and he informed his secretary that he would be returning the mobile phone provided to him by the Company through the driver on 18-12-2017, and he complied with it.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In the present case, FIR was registered alleging that petitioner, in his as CEO, was taking decisions on his own without consulting the Board of Directors and the information with him relating to the company was shared by him with third parties. The complaint against petitioner invoked Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561744\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">408<\/a><a id=\"fnref1\" href=\"#fn1\" title=\"1. Corresponding Section 316(4) of the Nyaya Sanhita, 2023\"><sup>1<\/sup><\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Penal Code, 1860<\/a> (&#8216;IPC&#8217;) along with Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001540620\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">43(b)<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001540650\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">66<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002796572\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">IT Act, 2000<\/a>. Later, the Investigating Officer (&#8216;IO&#8217;) inferred from the investigation, that the stored data was not a property and therefore, respondents decided to proceed with the investigation under Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001540620\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">43(b)<\/a> and Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001540650\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">66<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002796572\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">IT Act, 2000<\/a>, and not to move ahead under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561744\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">408<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">IPC<\/a>.<\/p>\n<h3>Analysis, Law, and Decision<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court noted that petitioner&#8217;s emails were related to preparation for briefings and presentations; and it had information about the Engines and meetings with the Airbus. Further, there were emails which were forwarded to petitioner&#8217;s attorney in Austria after resignation, seeking legal advice on the issue, relating to his exit from the company and had no concern with the Company&#8217;s information.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court on ascertaining from the IO as to whether there were any documents, which were downloaded and subsequently shared by petitioner in his capacity as a CEO, and if whether there was any material collated during the investigation to justify that it had been fraudulently and dishonestly downloaded, with an intention to gain any advantage from the company, was not provided with any information as the same was not collected.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court noted that the explanation appended to Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561885\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">66<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">IPC<\/a> clearly set out that the words &#8216;dishonestly&#8217; and &#8216;fraudulently&#8217; shall have the meaning assigned to it under Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561533\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">24<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561544\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">25<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">IPC<\/a>. The Court opined that since the word &#8216;fraudulent&#8217; was assigned a specific meaning, which contemplated an intention of causing wrongful gain to one person or wrongful loss to another person and when an act was alleged to be done fraudulently, it was only when a person was set to do a thing with an intent to defraud but not otherwise, thus, it did not find any material to that effect, being received by IO during the investigation.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court stated that it failed to understand as to how the offence under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001540650\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">66<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002796572\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">IT Act, 2000<\/a>, was made out and since the company from which petitioner sought exit had already secure its interest, by filing a suit, which was pending for adjudication and therein petitioner&#8217;s statement was recorded that he shall not use and\/or copy and\/or publish and\/or disclose to any person or persons any of the confidential information, trade secret and\/or knowhow pertaining to the Company and this statement being accepted as an undertaking to the Court, had sufficiently secured the interest of the Company.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court stated that since the accusation in the complaint did not lead to making out an offence under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001540620\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">43(b)<\/a> read with Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001540650\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">66<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002796572\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">IT Act, 2000<\/a>, petitioner&#8217;s case would fall within categories (a) and (e) as stated in <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">State of Haryana<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Bhajan Lal<\/span>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/Members\/SearchResult.aspx\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">1992 Supp (1) SCC 335<\/a>, wherein category (a) stated that &#8220;where the allegations made in the First Information Report or the complaint, even if they are taken at their face value and accepted in their entirety do not prima facie constitute any offence or make out a case against the accused&#8221;, and category (e) stated that &#8220;where allegations made in the FIR or complaint are so absurd and inherently improbable on the basis of which no prudent person can ever reach a just conclusion that there is sufficient ground for proceeding against the accused&#8217;.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court held that continuation of proceedings against petitioner would be nothing short of mere procedural rigmarole and therefore, the Court quashed and set aside the FIR, as it failed to make out an offence against petitioner under Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001540620\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">43(b)<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001540650\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">66<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002796572\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">IT Act, 2000<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Wolfgang Prock-Schauer v. State of Maharashtra, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/R6AQ0j90\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2024 SCC OnLine Bom 3482<\/a>, decided on 23-10-2024<\/span>]<\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">For the Petitioner: Advocate Niranjan Mundargi, a\/w Keral Mehta, Savani Gupte, Lalit Munshi, Siddhi Somani i\/b Samvad Partners for the Petitioner.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">For the Respondents: Advocate Tavleen Saini i\/b Crawford Bayley &amp; Co for Respondent 2; J.P. Yagnik, APP for the State.<\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Penal Code, 1860 &nbsp; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1158\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1158\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"penal code, 1860\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294601\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-768x511.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-440x293.jpg 440w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-650x433.jpg 650w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860.jpg 886w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-60x40.jpg 60w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<hr\/>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn1\" href=\"#fnref1\">1.<\/a> Corresponding Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9001803674\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">316(4)<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9001804326\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Nyaya Sanhita, 2023<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">Petitioner&#8217;s emails are related to preparation for briefings and presentations and have information about Engines and meetings with the Airbus. Further, emails that are forwarded to his attorney in Austria after resignation, seek legal advice on the issue, relating to his exit from the company and has no concern with the Company&#8217;s information.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":314919,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[2569,10451,60331,17071,74680,74679,74678,50878,67988,71006,63788,74681],"class_list":["post-334177","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-Bombay_High_Court","tag-confidential-information","tag-data-theft","tag-email","tag-former-ceo","tag-former-md","tag-go-air","tag-it-act-2000","tag-justice-bharati-dangre","tag-justice-manjusha-deshpande","tag-section-43","tag-section-66"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Bombay HC quashes FIR against Go Air\u2019s former MD and CEO allegedly involved in sending confidential information in emails| SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Bombay High Court quashed and set aside FIR against Go Air\u2019s former MD and CEO allegedly involved in sending confidential information to third party and his personal email ID\u2019s.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/30\/bomhc-quashes-fir-against-go-airs-former-md-ceo-allegedly-involved-in-sending-confidential-information\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Bombay HC quashes FIR against Go Air\u2019s former MD\/CEO allegedly involved in sending confidential information in emails\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Bombay High Court quashed and set aside FIR against Go Air\u2019s former MD and CEO allegedly involved in sending confidential information to third party and his personal email ID\u2019s.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/30\/bomhc-quashes-fir-against-go-airs-former-md-ceo-allegedly-involved-in-sending-confidential-information\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-10-30T10:30:17+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-11-07T05:45:15+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"591\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Simranjeet\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Bombay HC quashes FIR against Go Air\u2019s former MD\/CEO allegedly involved in sending confidential information in emails\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Simranjeet\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/30\/bomhc-quashes-fir-against-go-airs-former-md-ceo-allegedly-involved-in-sending-confidential-information\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/30\/bomhc-quashes-fir-against-go-airs-former-md-ceo-allegedly-involved-in-sending-confidential-information\/\",\"name\":\"Bombay HC quashes FIR against Go Air\u2019s former MD and CEO allegedly involved in sending confidential information in emails| SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/30\/bomhc-quashes-fir-against-go-airs-former-md-ceo-allegedly-involved-in-sending-confidential-information\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/30\/bomhc-quashes-fir-against-go-airs-former-md-ceo-allegedly-involved-in-sending-confidential-information\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-10-30T10:30:17+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-11-07T05:45:15+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/aaee99423671d3377042373c5dcdabbd\"},\"description\":\"Bombay High Court quashed and set aside FIR against Go Air\u2019s former MD and CEO allegedly involved in sending confidential information to third party and his personal email ID\u2019s.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/30\/bomhc-quashes-fir-against-go-airs-former-md-ceo-allegedly-involved-in-sending-confidential-information\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/30\/bomhc-quashes-fir-against-go-airs-former-md-ceo-allegedly-involved-in-sending-confidential-information\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/30\/bomhc-quashes-fir-against-go-airs-former-md-ceo-allegedly-involved-in-sending-confidential-information\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp\",\"width\":887,\"height\":591,\"caption\":\"Bombay High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/30\/bomhc-quashes-fir-against-go-airs-former-md-ceo-allegedly-involved-in-sending-confidential-information\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Bombay HC quashes FIR against Go Air\u2019s former MD\/CEO allegedly involved in sending confidential information in emails\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/aaee99423671d3377042373c5dcdabbd\",\"name\":\"Simranjeet\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/03d92c7ef8267a8c57730c194d10ea045f0dc6cb00ce27a633a2e25adccce1c9?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/03d92c7ef8267a8c57730c194d10ea045f0dc6cb00ce27a633a2e25adccce1c9?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Simranjeet\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Bombay HC quashes FIR against Go Air\u2019s former MD and CEO allegedly involved in sending confidential information in emails| SCC Times","description":"Bombay High Court quashed and set aside FIR against Go Air\u2019s former MD and CEO allegedly involved in sending confidential information to third party and his personal email ID\u2019s.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/30\/bomhc-quashes-fir-against-go-airs-former-md-ceo-allegedly-involved-in-sending-confidential-information\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Bombay HC quashes FIR against Go Air\u2019s former MD\/CEO allegedly involved in sending confidential information in emails","og_description":"Bombay High Court quashed and set aside FIR against Go Air\u2019s former MD and CEO allegedly involved in sending confidential information to third party and his personal email ID\u2019s.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/30\/bomhc-quashes-fir-against-go-airs-former-md-ceo-allegedly-involved-in-sending-confidential-information\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2024-10-30T10:30:17+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-11-07T05:45:15+00:00","og_image":[{"width":887,"height":591,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Simranjeet","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Bombay HC quashes FIR against Go Air\u2019s former MD\/CEO allegedly involved in sending confidential information in emails","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Simranjeet","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/30\/bomhc-quashes-fir-against-go-airs-former-md-ceo-allegedly-involved-in-sending-confidential-information\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/30\/bomhc-quashes-fir-against-go-airs-former-md-ceo-allegedly-involved-in-sending-confidential-information\/","name":"Bombay HC quashes FIR against Go Air\u2019s former MD and CEO allegedly involved in sending confidential information in emails| SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/30\/bomhc-quashes-fir-against-go-airs-former-md-ceo-allegedly-involved-in-sending-confidential-information\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/30\/bomhc-quashes-fir-against-go-airs-former-md-ceo-allegedly-involved-in-sending-confidential-information\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp","datePublished":"2024-10-30T10:30:17+00:00","dateModified":"2024-11-07T05:45:15+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/aaee99423671d3377042373c5dcdabbd"},"description":"Bombay High Court quashed and set aside FIR against Go Air\u2019s former MD and CEO allegedly involved in sending confidential information to third party and his personal email ID\u2019s.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/30\/bomhc-quashes-fir-against-go-airs-former-md-ceo-allegedly-involved-in-sending-confidential-information\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/30\/bomhc-quashes-fir-against-go-airs-former-md-ceo-allegedly-involved-in-sending-confidential-information\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/30\/bomhc-quashes-fir-against-go-airs-former-md-ceo-allegedly-involved-in-sending-confidential-information\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp","width":887,"height":591,"caption":"Bombay High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/30\/bomhc-quashes-fir-against-go-airs-former-md-ceo-allegedly-involved-in-sending-confidential-information\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Bombay HC quashes FIR against Go Air\u2019s former MD\/CEO allegedly involved in sending confidential information in emails"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/aaee99423671d3377042373c5dcdabbd","name":"Simranjeet","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/03d92c7ef8267a8c57730c194d10ea045f0dc6cb00ce27a633a2e25adccce1c9?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/03d92c7ef8267a8c57730c194d10ea045f0dc6cb00ce27a633a2e25adccce1c9?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Simranjeet"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":326747,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/17\/bombay-hc-preventive-detention-detainee-released-delay-in-decision-on-representation\/","url_meta":{"origin":334177,"position":0},"title":"[Preventive Detention] | Bombay HC sets aside detention order due to unexplained delay by Detaining Authority to decide on detenu\u2019s representation","author":"Editor","date":"July 17, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cWhen the liberty of a person is imperiled, immediate action should be taken by the relevant authorities\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Bombay High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":334382,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/04\/bomhc-declares-arrest-illegal-as-grounds-of-arrest-were-communicated-to-accuseds-wife-but-not-to-accused\/","url_meta":{"origin":334177,"position":1},"title":"Bombay HC declares arrest illegal as grounds of arrest were communicated to accused\u2019s wife but not to the accused","author":"Simranjeet","date":"November 4, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"From the arrest panchnama it is evident that the information is given to his wife on the cell number provided by petitioner-accused and apart from that there are no grounds of arrest mentioned in the arrest surrender form.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Bombay High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":377436,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/05\/bom-hc-reliance-on-whatsapp-chats-alone-insufficient-to-grant-divorce\/","url_meta":{"origin":334177,"position":2},"title":"Reliance on WhatsApp chats alone insufficient to grant divorce on grounds of cruelty: Bombay HC","author":"Soumya Yadav","date":"March 5, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cMerely relying on the WhatsApp chat, the divorce decree cannot be granted, since it is not proved by leading evidence.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"WhatsApp chats insufficient","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/WhatsApp-chats-insufficient.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/WhatsApp-chats-insufficient.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/WhatsApp-chats-insufficient.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/WhatsApp-chats-insufficient.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":297233,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/19\/supreme-court-collegium-recommends-appointment-of-4-advocate-as-judges-for-madras-hc-karnataka-hc-and-bombay-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":334177,"position":3},"title":"SC Collegium recommends appointment of 4 Advocates as Judges for Madras, Karnataka and Bombay High Courts","author":"Ritu","date":"July 19, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Out of the 4 names, one woman advocate has been recommended by the Supreme Court Collegium for appointment as a High Court Judge.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Appointments &amp; Transfers&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Appointments &amp; Transfers","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/appointments\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"supreme court collegium","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/supreme-court-collegium-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/supreme-court-collegium-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/supreme-court-collegium-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/supreme-court-collegium-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":337533,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/12\/19\/bomhc-permits-live-in-relationship-of-two-adults-belonging-to-different-religions\/","url_meta":{"origin":334177,"position":4},"title":"&#8216;No law prevents them to lead a life of their own choice&#8217;; Bombay HC permits live in relationship of two adults belonging to different religions","author":"Simranjeet","date":"December 19, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The girl\u2019s freedom was secured by directing her release from the custody of Shaskriya Stree Bhishekari Khikar Kendra but the relief of providing police protection was declined by the Court.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Bombay High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":326858,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/18\/bombay-hc-man-convicted-14-cases-incarcerated-beyond-sentence-period-default-fine-released\/","url_meta":{"origin":334177,"position":5},"title":"Bombay HC orders release of a man incarcerated beyond sentence period in default of payment of fines due to poverty","author":"Editor","date":"July 18, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court referred to Jolly George Varghese v. Bank of Cochin, (1980) 2 SCC 360 quoting Justice V.R. Krishna Iyer that \u201cto be poor, in this land of Daridranayan, is no crime, and to recover debts by the procedure of putting one in prison is too flagrantly violative of Article\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Bombay High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/334177","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=334177"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/334177\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/314919"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=334177"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=334177"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=334177"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}