{"id":334141,"date":"2024-10-30T10:00:12","date_gmt":"2024-10-30T04:30:12","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=334141"},"modified":"2024-11-06T11:48:51","modified_gmt":"2024-11-06T06:18:51","slug":"bar-section-77-upheld-allahabad-hc-water-tank-rcc-centre","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/30\/bar-section-77-upheld-allahabad-hc-water-tank-rcc-centre\/","title":{"rendered":"Bar under S.77 of U.P. Revenue Code is not applicable due to no change in Bhumidhari Rights; Allahabad HC upholds State’s use of land for water tank and RCC centre"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Allahabad High Court:<\/span> In a batch of public interest litigations filed by few villagers of mainly opposing construction of water tank and in one case construction of RCC Centre, on the land reserved in their village for ‘Charagaah’, ‘Gadahi’, ‘Naveen Parti’, ‘Khalihaan’ or other public purposes, Saurabh Shyam Shamshery, J. held that there is no merit in challenging the construction of the water tank and RCC center, as these projects serve the interests of the villagers. It noted that the land designated for these purposes constitutes a small portion of the overall land and does not render it unsuitable for use. Furthermore, since no Bhumidhari rights are established, the bar under Section 77 of the U.P. Revenue Code does not apply.<\/p>\n

The State asserts that an exercise was conducted to identify suitable locations for constructing water tanks. Following this assessment and based on a resolution from the Gram Sabha, appropriate land was designated for the project. Construction has commenced, with some villages already completed, utilizing taxpayer funds.<\/p>\n

Concerning the correction in revenue record, the Court noted that no proceedings were undertaken either by Gram Sabha concerned or petitioner, therefore, at this stage, the Court refused to enter into the said dispute. However, it said that in case construction has not been commenced and it is in the middle of said land, the project can be relooked so that it may be shifted to a corner, if other requirements are satisfied otherwise it may be made sure that construction of water tank may not render the land, if used as a Charagaah.<\/p>\n

The Court concluded that since there is no change of Bhumidhari rights, therefore, on basis of resolution of Gram Sabha if State has taken a decision to use a very small part of land for the purpose of construction of water tank or RCC Centre, out of the land marked for the purpose of Charagaah, Naveen Parti, Khalihaan etc. the bar of Section 77 of U.P. Revenue Code would not come in the way, except if it is shown that there is mala fide, which is not the case in present PILs.<\/p>\n

The Court mentioned that the petitioners have not come up with very specific case that land which is reserved for the purpose of Charagaah, Khalihaan etc. was earlier used for said purpose only since in some of the case it is used for marriage functions or playground also, therefore, objection on construction of water tank is nothing but an objection for the sake of it only.<\/p>\n

The Court after interacting with Pradhans which includes two women, noted that none of the Pradhan knew about their functions, as mentioned in Section 15<\/a> of U.P. Panchayat Raj Act, 1947<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Thus, while disposing of all the public interest litigations, the Court directed the department concerned to initiate some training programme for Pradhans within a period of three months from the date of this order, either on basis of Cluster or Commissionarate to make aware Pradhans, specifically women, about their rights and functions and to discourage concept of Pradhanpati.<\/p>\n

The Court directed that a copy of the order be forwarded to the Principal Secretary of the Panchayat Raj Department, Government of U.P., Lucknow, for compliance.<\/p>\n

[Ambika Yadav v. State of UP, 2024 SCC OnLine All 6274<\/a>, decided on 23-10-2024<\/span>]<\/p>\n\n

Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n

For Petitioners:<\/span> S\/Sri Hirdesh Kumar Yadav, Madan Mohan Srivastava, Ram Bahadur Singh, Suneel Kumar Mishra, Vijay Kumar, Kunwar Bahadur Srivastava, Janardan Shukla, Udai Shankar Chauhan, Advocates<\/p>\n

For Respondents:<\/span> S\/Sri Manish Goyal, Additional Advocate General assisted by J.N. Maurya, Chief Standing Counsel and Ravi Anand Agarwal, Rajesh Kumar Tripathi, Standing Counsels; and, Bhupendra Kumar Tripathi, Hari Narayan Singh, Rameshwar Prasad Shukla, A.K. Pandey, Pankaj Kumar Gupta, Arun Kumar Pandey, Sudhir Bharti and Bhupendra Kumar Tripathi, Advocates<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

“Whenever even a very small part of an area, reserved for a public purpose, is used for other public purpose, the Gram Sabha concerned, and officials of State will take endeavour to make out a larger consensus amongst the villagers so that they may not approach this Court to oppose the public cause”<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67512,"featured_media":314936,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[2822,74653,74659,74658,74662,74660,3391,74657,74661,74654,74655,74663,74656],"class_list":["post-334141","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-Allahabad_High_Court","tag-bhumidhari-rights","tag-gram-sabha-resolution","tag-legal-ruling","tag-panchayat-raj-department","tag-pradhan-training","tag-public_interest","tag-rcc-centre","tag-rights-of-pradhans","tag-section-77-of-u-p-revenue-code","tag-state-land-use","tag-up-panchayat-raj-act","tag-water-tank-construction"],"yoast_head":"\nBar under S. 77 of U.P. Revenue Code not applicable due to no change in Bhumidhari Rights; Allahabad HC upholds State's use of land for water tank and RCC Centre | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Allahabad HC ruled that bar under S. 77 of the U.P. Revenue Code does not apply due to no change in Bhumidhari rights, upheld State's decision to use land for construction of a water tank and RCC center\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/30\/bar-section-77-upheld-allahabad-hc-water-tank-rcc-centre\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Bar under S.77 of U.P. Revenue Code is not applicable due to no change in Bhumidhari Rights; Allahabad HC upholds State's use of land for water tank and RCC centre\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Allahabad HC ruled that bar under S. 77 of the U.P. Revenue Code does not apply due to no change in Bhumidhari rights, upheld State's decision to use land for construction of a water tank and RCC center\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/30\/bar-section-77-upheld-allahabad-hc-water-tank-rcc-centre\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-10-30T04:30:12+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-11-06T06:18:51+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"591\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Apoorva\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Bar under S.77 of U.P. Revenue Code is not applicable due to no change in Bhumidhari Rights; Allahabad HC upholds State's use of land for water tank and RCC centre\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Apoorva\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/30\/bar-section-77-upheld-allahabad-hc-water-tank-rcc-centre\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/30\/bar-section-77-upheld-allahabad-hc-water-tank-rcc-centre\/\",\"name\":\"Bar under S. 77 of U.P. Revenue Code not applicable due to no change in Bhumidhari Rights; Allahabad HC upholds State's use of land for water tank and RCC Centre | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/30\/bar-section-77-upheld-allahabad-hc-water-tank-rcc-centre\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/30\/bar-section-77-upheld-allahabad-hc-water-tank-rcc-centre\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-10-30T04:30:12+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-11-06T06:18:51+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/288d814d0864b57168e08daa1940a1c9\"},\"description\":\"Allahabad HC ruled that bar under S. 77 of the U.P. Revenue Code does not apply due to no change in Bhumidhari rights, upheld State's decision to use land for construction of a water tank and RCC center\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/30\/bar-section-77-upheld-allahabad-hc-water-tank-rcc-centre\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/30\/bar-section-77-upheld-allahabad-hc-water-tank-rcc-centre\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/30\/bar-section-77-upheld-allahabad-hc-water-tank-rcc-centre\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp\",\"width\":887,\"height\":591,\"caption\":\"Allahabad High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/30\/bar-section-77-upheld-allahabad-hc-water-tank-rcc-centre\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Bar under S.77 of U.P. Revenue Code is not applicable due to no change in Bhumidhari Rights; Allahabad HC upholds State’s use of land for water tank and RCC centre\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/288d814d0864b57168e08daa1940a1c9\",\"name\":\"Apoorva\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/549edb3ed2c7046a0c504583cf71db32c50251c1260a6331b2cc2973e80b0e91?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/549edb3ed2c7046a0c504583cf71db32c50251c1260a6331b2cc2973e80b0e91?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Apoorva\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc-editor\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Bar under S. 77 of U.P. Revenue Code not applicable due to no change in Bhumidhari Rights; Allahabad HC upholds State's use of land for water tank and RCC Centre | SCC Times","description":"Allahabad HC ruled that bar under S. 77 of the U.P. Revenue Code does not apply due to no change in Bhumidhari rights, upheld State's decision to use land for construction of a water tank and RCC center","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/30\/bar-section-77-upheld-allahabad-hc-water-tank-rcc-centre\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Bar under S.77 of U.P. Revenue Code is not applicable due to no change in Bhumidhari Rights; Allahabad HC upholds State's use of land for water tank and RCC centre","og_description":"Allahabad HC ruled that bar under S. 77 of the U.P. Revenue Code does not apply due to no change in Bhumidhari rights, upheld State's decision to use land for construction of a water tank and RCC center","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/30\/bar-section-77-upheld-allahabad-hc-water-tank-rcc-centre\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2024-10-30T04:30:12+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-11-06T06:18:51+00:00","og_image":[{"width":887,"height":591,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Apoorva","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Bar under S.77 of U.P. Revenue Code is not applicable due to no change in Bhumidhari Rights; Allahabad HC upholds State's use of land for water tank and RCC centre","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Apoorva","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/30\/bar-section-77-upheld-allahabad-hc-water-tank-rcc-centre\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/30\/bar-section-77-upheld-allahabad-hc-water-tank-rcc-centre\/","name":"Bar under S. 77 of U.P. Revenue Code not applicable due to no change in Bhumidhari Rights; Allahabad HC upholds State's use of land for water tank and RCC Centre | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/30\/bar-section-77-upheld-allahabad-hc-water-tank-rcc-centre\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/30\/bar-section-77-upheld-allahabad-hc-water-tank-rcc-centre\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp","datePublished":"2024-10-30T04:30:12+00:00","dateModified":"2024-11-06T06:18:51+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/288d814d0864b57168e08daa1940a1c9"},"description":"Allahabad HC ruled that bar under S. 77 of the U.P. Revenue Code does not apply due to no change in Bhumidhari rights, upheld State's decision to use land for construction of a water tank and RCC center","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/30\/bar-section-77-upheld-allahabad-hc-water-tank-rcc-centre\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/30\/bar-section-77-upheld-allahabad-hc-water-tank-rcc-centre\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/30\/bar-section-77-upheld-allahabad-hc-water-tank-rcc-centre\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp","width":887,"height":591,"caption":"Allahabad High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/30\/bar-section-77-upheld-allahabad-hc-water-tank-rcc-centre\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Bar under S.77 of U.P. Revenue Code is not applicable due to no change in Bhumidhari Rights; Allahabad HC upholds State’s use of land for water tank and RCC centre"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/288d814d0864b57168e08daa1940a1c9","name":"Apoorva","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/549edb3ed2c7046a0c504583cf71db32c50251c1260a6331b2cc2973e80b0e91?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/549edb3ed2c7046a0c504583cf71db32c50251c1260a6331b2cc2973e80b0e91?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Apoorva"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc-editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":332989,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/14\/revenue-code-fully-applicable-areas-added-municipal-limits-after-july-7-1949-previously-governed-z-a-act-before-repeal-allahabad-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":334141,"position":0},"title":"Revenue Code fully applicable to areas added to municipal limits after July 7, 1949, previously governed by Z.A. Act before its repeal: Allahabad HC","author":"Apoorva","date":"October 14, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe provisions of the Revenue Code will apply to the whole of Uttar Pradesh, except: (i) Chapter VIII which deals with management of land and other properties of Gram Panchayat or other local authorities, and (ii) Chapter IX which deals with tenures.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Allahabad High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":211571,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/07\/all-hc-mere-alteration-of-name-of-district-allahabad-not-affecting-public-interest-pil-dismissed\/","url_meta":{"origin":334141,"position":1},"title":"All HC | Mere alteration of name of district \u201cAllahabad\u201d, not affecting public interest; PIL dismissed","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"March 7, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court: This Public Interest Litigation was filed before Division Bench of Govind Mathur and Yogendra Kumar Srivastava, JJ., challenging the Notification issued by the State Government under Section 6 (2) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 whereby name of the existing district of \u201cAllahabad\u201d was changed to \u201cPrayagraj\u201d\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":295753,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/01\/allahabad-high-court-directs-state-specify-steps-towards-toilets-women-police-stations-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":334141,"position":2},"title":"Allahabad High Court directs State to specify steps taken towards providing women toilets, pure drinking water, fans etc. in police stations","author":"Apoorva","date":"July 1, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court directed the State to file an affidavit indicating therein the progress towards allotment of funds towards providing basic amenities to women in Police Stations","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"allahabad high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":206744,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/12\/deputy-commissioner-can-suspend-an-order-under-section-306-of-karnataka-municipalities-act-only-if-the-same-is-unlawful-likely-to-cause-injury-to-public-or-lead-to-a-breach-of-peace\/","url_meta":{"origin":334141,"position":3},"title":"Karnataka HC clarifies application of Section 306 of Karnataka Municipalities Act","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 12, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Karnataka High Court: A Division Bench comprising of Dinesh Maheshwari CJ and S. Sujatha, J. declined to exercise PIL jurisdiction in petition filed by residents of Kottur Town Panchayath challenging approval for construction of town panchayath building on a land. Mr N. Shankarayana Bhat, counsel on behalf of the petitioners,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":217032,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/18\/utt-hc-subsequent-issuance-of-notice-by-nagar-panchayat-not-barred-by-res-judicata-as-earlier-appeal-was-allowed-on-technical-ground-and-not-merits\/","url_meta":{"origin":334141,"position":4},"title":"Utt HC | Subsequent issuance of notice by Nagar Panchayat not barred by res judicata as earlier appeal was allowed on technical ground and not merits","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 18, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Uttaranchal High Court: Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. dismissed the instant writ petition where the petitioner sought mandamus to command respondent not to demolish the construction of his residential house. The disputed facts were that the constructed house of the petitioner was part of Gaon Sabha earlier. Subsequently, the land came under\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":307621,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/11\/22\/allahabad-high-court-quashes-demolition-orders-radhasoami-satsang-sabha-violation-natural-justice\/","url_meta":{"origin":334141,"position":5},"title":"Allahabad HC quashes demolition orders against Radhasoami Satsang Sabha on violation of principles of natural justice","author":"Apoorva","date":"November 22, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cNatural justice is an important concept in administrative law. It is not possible to define precisely and scientifically the expression Natural Justice. The principle of natural justice or fundamental rules of procedure of administrative action, are neither fixed nor prescribed in any code\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"allahabad high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/334141","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67512"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=334141"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/334141\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/314936"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=334141"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=334141"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=334141"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}