{"id":334022,"date":"2024-10-28T16:30:25","date_gmt":"2024-10-28T11:00:25","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=334022"},"modified":"2024-10-31T10:20:55","modified_gmt":"2024-10-31T04:50:55","slug":"delhi-high-court-injunction-yahoo-inc-trademark-infringement-yaahoo-mouth-freshener-legal-news","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/28\/delhi-high-court-injunction-yahoo-inc-trademark-infringement-yaahoo-mouth-freshener-legal-news\/","title":{"rendered":"Delhi High Court grants injunction in favor of Yahoo Inc. against trademark infringement by &#8216;YAAHOO!&#8217; Mouth Freshener"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Delhi High Court<\/span>: A suit was filed by Yahoo Inc. (plaintiff) seeking permanent injunction restraining the infringement of trademark, passing off, unfair competition, tarnishment, dilution, damages, rendition of accounts of profits, etc alleging unauthorized use of its well-known &#8220;YAHOO!&#8221; trademark by the defendant in the brand name &#8220;YAAHOO! Mouth Freshener&#8221;. Mini Pushkarna, J., held that the defendant was liable for trademark infringement and granted Yahoo Inc. both compensatory and punitive damages, thereby reaffirming the protection of well-known trademarks from unauthorized commercial exploitation.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Yahoo Inc., a globally recognized internet services company with a well-established and registered trademark, argued that the defendant&#8217;s use of a similar mark on a commercial product amounted to blatant trademark infringement and passing off. According to Yahoo Inc., the defendant&#8217;s choice of branding appeared intended to capitalize on the reputation and established goodwill of the &#8220;YAHOO!&#8221; trademark, which is distinct and widely associated with the plaintiff&#8217;s services and products.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The dispute led to legal action after an independent investigator, hired by Yahoo Inc., discovered &#8220;YAAHOO! Mouth Freshener&#8221; product in the market. The investigator learned from the defendant&#8217;s representative that they had been using the name &#8220;YAAHOO!&#8221; for their mouth freshener for approximately nine years, despite having no authorization or affiliation with the Yahoo brand. Additionally, the plaintiff presented evidence, including product samples and photographs, to support their claim of trademark infringement. The defendant, however, did not respond to the suit and failed to file a written statement, which allowed the case to proceed ex parte.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold; text-align: center;\">Yahoo Mouth Freshner<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%; text-align: center;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/16-30_Yahoo-Inc.-v-Omkar-Cottage-Industries-1.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/16-30_Yahoo-Inc.-v-Omkar-Cottage-Industries-1.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"431\" height=\"236\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court examined the evidence and determined that the defendant&#8217;s usage of &#8220;YAAHOO!&#8221; was likely not a coincidence but rather an intentional act to gain commercial benefit from Yahoo Inc.&#8217;s trademark. The Court emphasized that the defendant&#8217;s logo and stylized font resembled Yahoo&#8217;s earlier brand design, which further indicated bad faith and dishonesty. Since the defendant&#8217;s trademark application for &#8220;YAAHOO!&#8221; had previously been refused, the Court found this continued use demonstrated a clear disregard for trademark law and underscored the defendant&#8217;s mala fide intentions.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court also referenced previous judgments to support its decision to grant punitive damages. Reliance was placed on <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Times Incorporated v. Lokesh Srivastava<\/span> and <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Microsoft Corporation v. Rajendra Pawar<\/span>, which held that punitive damages are warranted to prevent trademark infringers from evading legal consequences simply by absenting themselves from court proceedings. The Court observed that if defendants could avoid accountability by not appearing in Court, it would disincentivize lawful business practices and promote willful infringement.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Thus, the Court held that Yahoo Inc. had established a strong case of trademark infringement and was entitled to a decree in its favor. The plaintiff was awarded compensatory damages of \u00e2\u201a\u00b98,92,451, corresponding to documented costs incurred, and further sought punitive damages. Recognizing the need to penalize the defendant for their conduct and deter similar infringements, the court awarded punitive damages of \u00e2\u201a\u00b927,00,000, aligning with the precedent that such damages serve as both corrective justice and a preventive measure against future misconduct.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Yahoo Inc. v. Omkar Cottage Industries, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/1KeQCGsE\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2024 SCC OnLine Del 7404<\/a>, decided on 23-10-2024<\/span>]<\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">Mr. Pravin Anand, Mr. Dhruv Anand, Ms. Udita Patro, Ms. Nimrat Singh, Ms. Sampurnaa Sanyal and Mr. Dhananjay Khanna, Advocates for plaintiff<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">Yahoo Inc.&#8217;s investigation revealed that the defendant was producing a mouth freshener under the name &#8220;YAAHOO! Mouth Freshener.&#8221; that closely resembled the established trademark &#8220;YAHOO!&#8221;, leading to allegations of trademark infringement and passing off.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67516,"featured_media":314886,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[74503,72373,2943,72374,49257,74588,72375,74589,74587,74591,74590,74586],"class_list":["post-334022","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-brandprotection","tag-delhihighcourt","tag-injunction","tag-intellectualproperty","tag-legalnews","tag-passingoff","tag-trademarkinfringement","tag-trademarklaw","tag-yaahoo","tag-yaahoomouthfreshener","tag-yahoo-inc","tag-yahooinc"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.4 (Yoast SEO v27.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Delhi HC grants injunction in favor of Yahoo Inc. against trademark infringement by &#039;YAAHOO!&#039; mouth freshener| SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Delhi High Court grants injunction in favor of Yahoo Inc. against trademark infringement by &#039;YAAHOO!&#039; mouth freshener.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/28\/delhi-high-court-injunction-yahoo-inc-trademark-infringement-yaahoo-mouth-freshener-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Delhi High Court grants injunction in favor of Yahoo Inc. against trademark infringement by &#039;YAAHOO!&#039; Mouth Freshener\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Delhi High Court grants injunction in favor of Yahoo Inc. against trademark infringement by &#039;YAAHOO!&#039; mouth freshener.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/28\/delhi-high-court-injunction-yahoo-inc-trademark-infringement-yaahoo-mouth-freshener-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-10-28T11:00:25+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-10-31T04:50:55+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"591\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Arunima\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Delhi High Court grants injunction in favor of Yahoo Inc. against trademark infringement by &#039;YAAHOO!&#039; Mouth Freshener\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Arunima\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/10\\\/28\\\/delhi-high-court-injunction-yahoo-inc-trademark-infringement-yaahoo-mouth-freshener-legal-news\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/10\\\/28\\\/delhi-high-court-injunction-yahoo-inc-trademark-infringement-yaahoo-mouth-freshener-legal-news\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Arunima\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/12b21fd8f65a572f39f27151710e16cb\"},\"headline\":\"Delhi High Court grants injunction in favor of Yahoo Inc. against trademark infringement by &#8216;YAAHOO!&#8217; Mouth Freshener\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-10-28T11:00:25+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-10-31T04:50:55+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/10\\\/28\\\/delhi-high-court-injunction-yahoo-inc-trademark-infringement-yaahoo-mouth-freshener-legal-news\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":558,\"commentCount\":1,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/10\\\/28\\\/delhi-high-court-injunction-yahoo-inc-trademark-infringement-yaahoo-mouth-freshener-legal-news\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/02\\\/Delhi-High-Court.webp\",\"keywords\":[\"BrandProtection\",\"DelhiHighCourt\",\"injunction\",\"IntellectualProperty\",\"LegalNews\",\"PassingOff\",\"TrademarkInfringement\",\"TrademarkLaw\",\"YAAHOO\",\"YAAHOOMouthFreshener\",\"Yahoo Inc\",\"YahooInc\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Case Briefs\",\"High Courts\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/10\\\/28\\\/delhi-high-court-injunction-yahoo-inc-trademark-infringement-yaahoo-mouth-freshener-legal-news\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/10\\\/28\\\/delhi-high-court-injunction-yahoo-inc-trademark-infringement-yaahoo-mouth-freshener-legal-news\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/10\\\/28\\\/delhi-high-court-injunction-yahoo-inc-trademark-infringement-yaahoo-mouth-freshener-legal-news\\\/\",\"name\":\"Delhi HC grants injunction in favor of Yahoo Inc. against trademark infringement by 'YAAHOO!' mouth freshener| SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/10\\\/28\\\/delhi-high-court-injunction-yahoo-inc-trademark-infringement-yaahoo-mouth-freshener-legal-news\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/10\\\/28\\\/delhi-high-court-injunction-yahoo-inc-trademark-infringement-yaahoo-mouth-freshener-legal-news\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/02\\\/Delhi-High-Court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-10-28T11:00:25+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-10-31T04:50:55+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/12b21fd8f65a572f39f27151710e16cb\"},\"description\":\"Delhi High Court grants injunction in favor of Yahoo Inc. against trademark infringement by 'YAAHOO!' mouth freshener.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/10\\\/28\\\/delhi-high-court-injunction-yahoo-inc-trademark-infringement-yaahoo-mouth-freshener-legal-news\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/10\\\/28\\\/delhi-high-court-injunction-yahoo-inc-trademark-infringement-yaahoo-mouth-freshener-legal-news\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/10\\\/28\\\/delhi-high-court-injunction-yahoo-inc-trademark-infringement-yaahoo-mouth-freshener-legal-news\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/02\\\/Delhi-High-Court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/02\\\/Delhi-High-Court.webp\",\"width\":887,\"height\":591,\"caption\":\"Delhi High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/10\\\/28\\\/delhi-high-court-injunction-yahoo-inc-trademark-infringement-yaahoo-mouth-freshener-legal-news\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Delhi High Court grants injunction in favor of Yahoo Inc. against trademark infringement by &#8216;YAAHOO!&#8217; Mouth Freshener\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/12b21fd8f65a572f39f27151710e16cb\",\"name\":\"Arunima\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/8375ad8b08b1cbd970f4484d3218d81f3222a0ee3e463210f657780cb13e9569?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/8375ad8b08b1cbd970f4484d3218d81f3222a0ee3e463210f657780cb13e9569?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/8375ad8b08b1cbd970f4484d3218d81f3222a0ee3e463210f657780cb13e9569?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Arunima\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/author\\\/scc-editor_9\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Delhi HC grants injunction in favor of Yahoo Inc. against trademark infringement by 'YAAHOO!' mouth freshener| SCC Times","description":"Delhi High Court grants injunction in favor of Yahoo Inc. against trademark infringement by 'YAAHOO!' mouth freshener.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/28\/delhi-high-court-injunction-yahoo-inc-trademark-infringement-yaahoo-mouth-freshener-legal-news\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Delhi High Court grants injunction in favor of Yahoo Inc. against trademark infringement by 'YAAHOO!' Mouth Freshener","og_description":"Delhi High Court grants injunction in favor of Yahoo Inc. against trademark infringement by 'YAAHOO!' mouth freshener.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/28\/delhi-high-court-injunction-yahoo-inc-trademark-infringement-yaahoo-mouth-freshener-legal-news\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2024-10-28T11:00:25+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-10-31T04:50:55+00:00","og_image":[{"width":887,"height":591,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Arunima","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Delhi High Court grants injunction in favor of Yahoo Inc. against trademark infringement by 'YAAHOO!' Mouth Freshener","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Arunima","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/28\/delhi-high-court-injunction-yahoo-inc-trademark-infringement-yaahoo-mouth-freshener-legal-news\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/28\/delhi-high-court-injunction-yahoo-inc-trademark-infringement-yaahoo-mouth-freshener-legal-news\/"},"author":{"name":"Arunima","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/12b21fd8f65a572f39f27151710e16cb"},"headline":"Delhi High Court grants injunction in favor of Yahoo Inc. against trademark infringement by &#8216;YAAHOO!&#8217; Mouth Freshener","datePublished":"2024-10-28T11:00:25+00:00","dateModified":"2024-10-31T04:50:55+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/28\/delhi-high-court-injunction-yahoo-inc-trademark-infringement-yaahoo-mouth-freshener-legal-news\/"},"wordCount":558,"commentCount":1,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/28\/delhi-high-court-injunction-yahoo-inc-trademark-infringement-yaahoo-mouth-freshener-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp","keywords":["BrandProtection","DelhiHighCourt","injunction","IntellectualProperty","LegalNews","PassingOff","TrademarkInfringement","TrademarkLaw","YAAHOO","YAAHOOMouthFreshener","Yahoo Inc","YahooInc"],"articleSection":["Case Briefs","High Courts"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/28\/delhi-high-court-injunction-yahoo-inc-trademark-infringement-yaahoo-mouth-freshener-legal-news\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/28\/delhi-high-court-injunction-yahoo-inc-trademark-infringement-yaahoo-mouth-freshener-legal-news\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/28\/delhi-high-court-injunction-yahoo-inc-trademark-infringement-yaahoo-mouth-freshener-legal-news\/","name":"Delhi HC grants injunction in favor of Yahoo Inc. against trademark infringement by 'YAAHOO!' mouth freshener| SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/28\/delhi-high-court-injunction-yahoo-inc-trademark-infringement-yaahoo-mouth-freshener-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/28\/delhi-high-court-injunction-yahoo-inc-trademark-infringement-yaahoo-mouth-freshener-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp","datePublished":"2024-10-28T11:00:25+00:00","dateModified":"2024-10-31T04:50:55+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/12b21fd8f65a572f39f27151710e16cb"},"description":"Delhi High Court grants injunction in favor of Yahoo Inc. against trademark infringement by 'YAAHOO!' mouth freshener.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/28\/delhi-high-court-injunction-yahoo-inc-trademark-infringement-yaahoo-mouth-freshener-legal-news\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/28\/delhi-high-court-injunction-yahoo-inc-trademark-infringement-yaahoo-mouth-freshener-legal-news\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/28\/delhi-high-court-injunction-yahoo-inc-trademark-infringement-yaahoo-mouth-freshener-legal-news\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp","width":887,"height":591,"caption":"Delhi High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/28\/delhi-high-court-injunction-yahoo-inc-trademark-infringement-yaahoo-mouth-freshener-legal-news\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Delhi High Court grants injunction in favor of Yahoo Inc. against trademark infringement by &#8216;YAAHOO!&#8217; Mouth Freshener"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/12b21fd8f65a572f39f27151710e16cb","name":"Arunima","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8375ad8b08b1cbd970f4484d3218d81f3222a0ee3e463210f657780cb13e9569?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8375ad8b08b1cbd970f4484d3218d81f3222a0ee3e463210f657780cb13e9569?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8375ad8b08b1cbd970f4484d3218d81f3222a0ee3e463210f657780cb13e9569?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Arunima"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc-editor_9\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":140981,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/07\/06\/delhi-high-court-awards-yahoo-inc-rs-5-lakh-damages-for-trademark-infringement\/","url_meta":{"origin":334022,"position":0},"title":"Delhi High Court awards Yahoo Inc. Rs. 5 lakh damages for trademark infringement","author":"Saba","date":"July 6, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: A Single Judge Bench of the Delhi High Court granted an ex parte order in favour of Yahoo Inc. restraining the defendant to use the domain name \u2018yahookochi\u2019 and also awarded damages of Rs. 5 lakh. The Court noted that there is no plausible explanation for the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":80141,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/10\/20\/yahoo-proves-trademark-infringement-by-apricot-foods-passing-off-goods-by-using-goodwill\/","url_meta":{"origin":334022,"position":1},"title":"YAHOO! proves trademark infringement by Apricot foods &#8211; passing off goods by using goodwill","author":"Saba","date":"October 20, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court:\u00a0\u00a0In this case the plaintiffs are seeking permanent injunction to restrain the defendants from passing off of goods by infringing upon the trademark of the plaintiffs. The facts of the case are that the plaintiffs are owners of the trademark \u2018YAHOO\u2019 that has been registered in India in\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":272153,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/24\/delhi-high-court-grants-permanent-injunction-royal-champ-compensates-damages-royal-stag-copyright-trademark-infrigement\/","url_meta":{"origin":334022,"position":2},"title":"Delhi High Court injuncts Royal Champ from using Royal Stag\/ Seagram marks; Similar label also amounts to copyright infringement; Directs Rs 20 lakh as damages","author":"Editor","date":"August 24, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: In a case where permanent injunction was sought against use of Royal Champs, a Gwalior Distilleries Private Limited product (\u2018defendants'), selling whiskeys under a deceptively similar name and label design and using the goodwill of Royal Stag, a Seagram India Private Limited product (plaintiffs), Navin Chawla, J.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":273586,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/13\/delhi-high-court-grants-ex-parte-ad-interim-injunction-against-jamshedpur-based-restaurant-social-75-for-using-the-registered-trademark-social\/","url_meta":{"origin":334022,"position":3},"title":"Delhi High Court grants ex parte ad interim injunction against Jamshedpur based restaurant SOCIAL 75 for using the registered trademark SOCIAL","author":"Editor","date":"September 13, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: In a trademark infringement suit filed by a company namely, Impresario Entertainment and Hospitality Pvt Ltd. (\u2018plaintiff') running a well-known restaurant, SOCIAL against the offending trademark SOCIAL 75 (\u2018defendant'), Jyoti Singh J. granted ex parte ad-interim injunction, as the impugned trademark is deceptively similar to the registered\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Delhi-High-Court-grants-ex-parte-ad-interim-injunction-against-Jamshedpur-based-restaurant-SOCIAL-75-for-using-the-registered-trademark-SOCIAL-2-1-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Delhi-High-Court-grants-ex-parte-ad-interim-injunction-against-Jamshedpur-based-restaurant-SOCIAL-75-for-using-the-registered-trademark-SOCIAL-2-1-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Delhi-High-Court-grants-ex-parte-ad-interim-injunction-against-Jamshedpur-based-restaurant-SOCIAL-75-for-using-the-registered-trademark-SOCIAL-2-1-1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Delhi-High-Court-grants-ex-parte-ad-interim-injunction-against-Jamshedpur-based-restaurant-SOCIAL-75-for-using-the-registered-trademark-SOCIAL-2-1-1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Delhi-High-Court-grants-ex-parte-ad-interim-injunction-against-Jamshedpur-based-restaurant-SOCIAL-75-for-using-the-registered-trademark-SOCIAL-2-1-1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":202017,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/20\/permanent-injunction-granted-for-infringement-of-trademark-on-satisfaction-of-triple-identity-test\/","url_meta":{"origin":334022,"position":4},"title":"Permanent injunction granted for infringement of trademark on satisfaction of \u2018triple identity test\u2019","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 20, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Manmohan, J. decreed a suit for grant of a permanent injunction against the defendant for infringement of plaintiff \u2019s trademarks. It was an admitted fact that the plaintiff was a registered owner of the trademarks SUMEET and SUMEET TRADITIONAL for their\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":279499,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/12\/ajinomoto-film-stopped-by-delhi-high-court-after-maker-of-monosodium-glutamate-spice-filed-lawsuit-alleging-trademark-infringement-legal-research-updates-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":334022,"position":5},"title":"Delhi High Court stays release of movie &#8216;AJINOMOTO&#8217; after Japanese spice maker claims trademark infringement","author":"Editor","date":"December 12, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Considering that the movie was conceptualised and crafted metaphorically around a cooking ingredient that is closely related to its product, Ajinomoto Co Inc has claimed that any negative portrayal would be bound to seriously harm its reputation.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-418.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/334022","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67516"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=334022"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/334022\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/314886"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=334022"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=334022"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=334022"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}