{"id":333366,"date":"2024-10-18T15:30:50","date_gmt":"2024-10-18T10:00:50","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=333366"},"modified":"2024-10-24T10:52:15","modified_gmt":"2024-10-24T05:22:15","slug":"pune-triple-murder-case-death-penalty-acquittal-sc-legal-news","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/18\/pune-triple-murder-case-death-penalty-acquittal-sc-legal-news\/","title":{"rendered":"Know why Supreme Court decided to acquit and quash death sentence of 2012 Pune Triple Murder accused"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Supreme Court:<\/span> Considering the instant appeal filed by the appellant accused in Pune Triple Murder case of 2012, challenging the confirmation of conviction and death sentence by Bombay High Court, the 3- Judge Bench of B.R. Gavai*<\/span>, Prashant Kumar Mishra and K.V. Viswanathan, JJ., taking note of discrepancies in testimony of key prosecution witness and failure of prosecution to prove appellant’s guilt beyond reasonable doubt, quashed his conviction and sentence and deemed it fit to acquit him.<\/p>\n

Background:<\/h3>\n

On 4-10-2012, the appellant called the Police control room informing them about robbery at his house; the killing of his mother, wife and 2-year-old daughter and injury to his neighbour. Subsequently an FIR was registered against unknown persons. However, the investigation led to recovery of the robbed items within the house. It was further revealed that the appellant was involved in an extra-marital affair. Furthermore, based on the CCTV footage of the appellant’s house the appellant was suspected of having committed murders by the Police and so he was arrested on 5-10-2012.<\/p>\n

The appellant made a disclosure about keeping his blood-stained clothes and Mangalsutra of his wife at a place in M.I.D.C., Hadapsar Area, Pune and he further disclosed about throwing the hammer used for committing the crime. Another disclosure was made by the appellant about a consent letter for divorce by his wife which was found in a drawer inside his house.<\/p>\n

After completion of the investigation, a chargesheet was filed against the appellant for the offences punishable under Sections 302<\/a>, 307<\/a> and 201<\/a> of IPC<\/a>. Since the case was exclusively triable by the Sessions Court, it was committed to the Sessions Court for trial. Charges were framed against the appellant by the trial court for the commission of the offences punishable under Sections 302<\/a>, 307<\/a> and 201<\/a> of IPC<\/a>.<\/p>\n

The prosecution examined 16 witnesses. At the conclusion of the trial, the Trial Court found that the prosecution had proved the guilt of the accused (appellant) beyond reasonable doubt.<\/p>\n

On 26-8-2016, the Trial Court convicted the appellant for the offences punishable under Sections 302<\/a>, 307<\/a> and 201<\/a> of IPC<\/a> and vide order dated 31-8- 2016 he was sentenced to death along with a fine of Rs. 5,000\/-, in default whereof to suffer rigorous imprisonment of 1 year for the offence punishable under Section 302<\/a> of IPC<\/a>; rigorous imprisonment for 10 years along with fine of Rs. 10,000\/-, in default whereof rigorous imprisonment of 1 year for the offence punishable under Section 307<\/a> of IPC<\/a> and rigorous imprisonment of 3 years along with a fine of Rs. 5,000\/-, in default whereof rigorous imprisonment of 6 months for the offences punishable under Section 201<\/a> of IPC<\/a>.<\/p>\n

For confirmation of the execution of the death sentence, a reference was made by the Trial Court to Bombay High Court. Via the impugned judgment and order, the High Court upheld the conviction of the appellant and confirmed the death sentence imposed on him. However, in view of Section 415(1)<\/a> of CrPC<\/a> the operation and effect of the impugned judgment was stayed till the expiry of period allowed for preferring an appeal before Supreme Court.<\/p>\n

Contentions:<\/h3>\n

Counsel for the appellant argued that the Trial Court and High Court erred in holding the appellant guilty for the offence punishable under Section 302<\/a> of IPC<\/a>. It was submitted that the prosecution case mainly rested on the evidence of the injured neighbour (PW-12). It was argued that PW-12’s statement under S. 161<\/a>, CrPC<\/a> was recorded belatedly i.e. after 6 days with no reasons given for the delay. Furthermore, PW-12’s statement was recorded by the Police after he was informed that an FIR has been registered against the appellant for committing the murder of his wife, daughter and mother.<\/p>\n

The appellant’s counsel pointed out that if the PW-12’s statement is discarded then the only circumstances upon which the prosecution relied were recovery of hammer and clothes at the instance of the appellant. However, it was submitted that the said recoveries were all farcical and cannot be relied on.<\/p>\n

Per contra<\/span>, the respondent argued that the Trial Court and High Court based on the evidence placed before them, concurrently come to a considered conclusion that the prosecution had proved the case beyond reasonable doubt. It was further submitted that ocular testimony of PW-12 was corroborated by other circumstantial evidence. It was argued that PW-12 was an injured witness and therefore, greater credence would be attached to his testimony.<\/p>\n

Court’s Assessment:<\/h3>\n

Perusing the matter, the Court noted that the prosecution case mainly rested on PW-12’s testimony. PW-12 stated that he knew all the three deceased persons as well as the appellant. He stated that the deceased persons as well as the appellant used to reside in his neighbourhood. The witness further stated that there used to be quarrels between the appellant on one hand and his mother and wife on the other. He stated that the appellant was intending to marry another lady and that he was intending to give divorce to his wife.<\/p>\n

The Court further took note of PW-12’s examination-in-chief wherein he had stated that he was attacked by the appellant with a hammer and was admitted to hospital for 6 days. PW-12 could not identify the hammer as to whether it was the same hammer used by the appellant for the commission of crime.<\/p>\n

The Court found PW-12’s statements to be full of contradictions. Though, he stated in his examination-in-chief that the appellant was holding hammer in his hand, and he was going away, the same did not find place in the statement recorded under Section 164<\/a> CrPC<\/a> by Judicial Magistrate, First Class. The Court also took note of PW-12’s contradictory statement vis-a-vis his consciousness when he was taken to the hospital.<\/p>\n

The Court further deliberated that if PW-12 was conscious and oriented at the time of admission in the hospital, then why was his statement not immediately recorded. Moreover, not a single neighbour was examined to corroborate the version of PW-12. Furthermore, his testimony did not show that he has witnessed the incident and he himself admitted that he had given the statement after he was informed by the police that the present appellant had committed the crime.<\/p>\n

Considering the testimony of the Investigating Officer, the Court pointed out that the delay of 6 days in recording the statement of PW-12 particularly when the evidence of the attending doctor showed that PW-12 had given the history of the incident and was conscious and oriented, cast serious doubt on the testimony of PW-12. “No doubt that a conviction could be based solely on the basis of the evidence of a solitary witness, however, the testimony of such a witness is required to be found to be credible and trustworthy. It is also necessary to examine the testimony of such a witness critically<\/span>”.<\/p>\n

The Court hence found that PW-12’s testimony did not inspire confidence in the mind of the Court to base the conviction for the offence punishable under Section 302<\/a> of IPC<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Upon discarding the PW-12’s testimony, the case thus became one of circumstantial evidence. The Court reiterated the principles regarding when and how convictions can be based on circumstantial evidence and that suspicion, however strong it may be, cannot take the place of proof beyond reasonable doubt. It was stated that an accused cannot be convicted solely on the grounds of suspicion, no matter how strong it is. An accused is presumed to be innocent unless proved guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.<\/p>\n

Considering the circumstantial evidence in the instant case, the Court pointed out that the prosecution could not prove the appellant’s guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The Court also did not rule out the possibility of tampering of evidence.<\/p>\n

Vis-a-vis motive, the Court found that a conviction can’t be based solely on circumstance of motive. It is a primary principle that the accused “must be” and not merely “may be” guilty before a court can convict and every possible hypothesis except the guilt of the accused has to be ruled out.<\/p>\n

Therefore, the Court opined that the prosecution failed to rule out every possible hypothesis except the guilt of the appellant. Hence the Court held that the impugned order and judgment of the Trial Court and High Court are not sustainable in law. Hence the appellant’s conviction and sentence were quashed.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\n

CASE DETAILS<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n<\/colgroup>\n\n\n
\n

Citation:<\/span>
2024 SCC OnLine SC 2884<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n

Appellants :<\/span>
Vishwajeet Kerba Masalkar<\/p>\n

Respondents :<\/span>
State of Maharashtra<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

Advocates who appeared in this case<\/p>\n

For Petitioner(s):<\/span>
Payoshi Roy, Counsel<\/p>\n

For Respondent(s):<\/span>
Siddharth Dharmadhikari, Counsel<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

CORAM :<\/span><\/p>\n

\n
\n

\"B.R.
B.R. Gavai, J.<\/span><\/img><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

\"Prashant
Prashant Kumar Mishra, J.<\/span><\/img><\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

\"K.V.
K.V. Viswanathan, J.<\/span><\/img><\/p>\n<\/div>\n

<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

Buy Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973  HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n

\"Code<\/a><\/p>\n

Buy Penal Code, 1860   HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n

\"penal<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The accused was arrested in 2012 on the suspicion of murdering his wife, mother and 2-year-old daughter. In 2016, the Trial Court convicted him and imposed death penalty which was confirmed by Bombay High Court<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":333376,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,9],"tags":[4561,3433,3035,2896,44180,24914,74242,2574,6672],"class_list":["post-333366","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-supremecourt","tag-acquittal","tag-circumstantial_evidence","tag-death_penalty","tag-Death_sentence","tag-justice-br-gavai","tag-motive","tag-pune-triple-murder-case","tag-testimony","tag-witness"],"yoast_head":"\nKnow why SC decided to acquit and quash death sentence of the accused in Pune Triple Murder case<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"The accused was arrested in 2012 on the suspicion of murdering his wife, mother and 2-year-old daughter. In 2016, the Trial Court convicted him and imposed death penalty.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/18\/pune-triple-murder-case-death-penalty-acquittal-sc-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Know why Supreme Court decided to acquit and quash death sentence of 2012 Pune Triple Murder accused\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The accused was arrested in 2012 on the suspicion of murdering his wife, mother and 2-year-old daughter. In 2016, the Trial Court convicted him and imposed death penalty.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/18\/pune-triple-murder-case-death-penalty-acquittal-sc-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-10-18T10:00:50+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-10-24T05:22:15+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Pune-Triple-Murder-case-accused-acquitted.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Know why Supreme Court decided to acquit and quash death sentence of 2012 Pune Triple Murder accused\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/18\/pune-triple-murder-case-death-penalty-acquittal-sc-legal-news\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/18\/pune-triple-murder-case-death-penalty-acquittal-sc-legal-news\/\",\"name\":\"Know why SC decided to acquit and quash death sentence of the accused in Pune Triple Murder case\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/18\/pune-triple-murder-case-death-penalty-acquittal-sc-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/18\/pune-triple-murder-case-death-penalty-acquittal-sc-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Pune-Triple-Murder-case-accused-acquitted.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-10-18T10:00:50+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-10-24T05:22:15+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\"},\"description\":\"The accused was arrested in 2012 on the suspicion of murdering his wife, mother and 2-year-old daughter. In 2016, the Trial Court convicted him and imposed death penalty.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/18\/pune-triple-murder-case-death-penalty-acquittal-sc-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/18\/pune-triple-murder-case-death-penalty-acquittal-sc-legal-news\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/18\/pune-triple-murder-case-death-penalty-acquittal-sc-legal-news\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Pune-Triple-Murder-case-accused-acquitted.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Pune-Triple-Murder-case-accused-acquitted.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"Pune Triple Murder case accused acquitted\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/18\/pune-triple-murder-case-death-penalty-acquittal-sc-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Know why Supreme Court decided to acquit and quash death sentence of 2012 Pune Triple Murder accused\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\",\"name\":\"Sucheta\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Sucheta\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Know why SC decided to acquit and quash death sentence of the accused in Pune Triple Murder case","description":"The accused was arrested in 2012 on the suspicion of murdering his wife, mother and 2-year-old daughter. In 2016, the Trial Court convicted him and imposed death penalty.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/18\/pune-triple-murder-case-death-penalty-acquittal-sc-legal-news\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Know why Supreme Court decided to acquit and quash death sentence of 2012 Pune Triple Murder accused","og_description":"The accused was arrested in 2012 on the suspicion of murdering his wife, mother and 2-year-old daughter. In 2016, the Trial Court convicted him and imposed death penalty.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/18\/pune-triple-murder-case-death-penalty-acquittal-sc-legal-news\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2024-10-18T10:00:50+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-10-24T05:22:15+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Pune-Triple-Murder-case-accused-acquitted.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Sucheta","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Know why Supreme Court decided to acquit and quash death sentence of 2012 Pune Triple Murder accused","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Sucheta","Est. reading time":"8 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/18\/pune-triple-murder-case-death-penalty-acquittal-sc-legal-news\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/18\/pune-triple-murder-case-death-penalty-acquittal-sc-legal-news\/","name":"Know why SC decided to acquit and quash death sentence of the accused in Pune Triple Murder case","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/18\/pune-triple-murder-case-death-penalty-acquittal-sc-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/18\/pune-triple-murder-case-death-penalty-acquittal-sc-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Pune-Triple-Murder-case-accused-acquitted.webp","datePublished":"2024-10-18T10:00:50+00:00","dateModified":"2024-10-24T05:22:15+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa"},"description":"The accused was arrested in 2012 on the suspicion of murdering his wife, mother and 2-year-old daughter. In 2016, the Trial Court convicted him and imposed death penalty.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/18\/pune-triple-murder-case-death-penalty-acquittal-sc-legal-news\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/18\/pune-triple-murder-case-death-penalty-acquittal-sc-legal-news\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/18\/pune-triple-murder-case-death-penalty-acquittal-sc-legal-news\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Pune-Triple-Murder-case-accused-acquitted.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Pune-Triple-Murder-case-accused-acquitted.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"Pune Triple Murder case accused acquitted"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/18\/pune-triple-murder-case-death-penalty-acquittal-sc-legal-news\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Know why Supreme Court decided to acquit and quash death sentence of 2012 Pune Triple Murder accused"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa","name":"Sucheta","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Sucheta"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Pune-Triple-Murder-case-accused-acquitted.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":260337,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/20\/conviction-and-death-sentence-on-the-same-day-for-kidnapping-rape-and-murder-of-an-11-year-old-sc-commutes-sentence-from-death-to-life\/","url_meta":{"origin":333366,"position":0},"title":"Conviction and Death Sentence on the same Day for kidnapping, rape and murder of an 11 Year Old: SC commutes sentence from death to life","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"January 20, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: In a case where the order of conviction and sentence was passed on the same day, the 3-judge bench of L. Nageswara Rao, BR Gavai and BV Nagarathna, JJ has stressed on the importance of bifurcated hearing for convicting and sentencing and has observed that the same is\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Conviction-and-Death-Sentence-on-the-same-Day-for-kidnapping-rape-and-murder-of-an-11-Year-Old-SC-commutes-sentence-from-death-to-life.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Conviction-and-Death-Sentence-on-the-same-Day-for-kidnapping-rape-and-murder-of-an-11-Year-Old-SC-commutes-sentence-from-death-to-life.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Conviction-and-Death-Sentence-on-the-same-Day-for-kidnapping-rape-and-murder-of-an-11-Year-Old-SC-commutes-sentence-from-death-to-life.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Conviction-and-Death-Sentence-on-the-same-Day-for-kidnapping-rape-and-murder-of-an-11-Year-Old-SC-commutes-sentence-from-death-to-life.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Conviction-and-Death-Sentence-on-the-same-Day-for-kidnapping-rape-and-murder-of-an-11-Year-Old-SC-commutes-sentence-from-death-to-life.png?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":258310,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/12\/10\/sc-awards-30-years-ri-to-man-who-killed-2-brothers-finds-imposition-of-death-penalty-on-the-day-of-conviction-itself-wrong\/","url_meta":{"origin":333366,"position":1},"title":"SC awards 30 years RI to man who killed 2 brothers & nephew; Finds imposition of death penalty on the day of conviction itself, wrong\u00a0","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"December 10, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: In a case where the trial court had convicted the accused and imposed death penalty on the very same day, the 3-judge bench of L. Nageswara Rao, BR Gavai* and BV Nagarathna, JJ has converted the death sentence to life imprisonment after noticing that the trial court as\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":291695,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/10\/supreme-court-commutes-death-sentence-in-honour-killing-case-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":333366,"position":2},"title":"Honour Killing | Supreme Court commutes death sentence of man who killed newly married sister and her paramour","author":"Editor","date":"May 10, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\"It is well-settled law that awarding of life sentence is a rule and death is an exception. The application of the rarest of rare case principle is dependent upon and differs from case to case.\"","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"death sentence in honour killing case","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/death-sentence-in-honour-killing-case.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/death-sentence-in-honour-killing-case.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/death-sentence-in-honour-killing-case.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/death-sentence-in-honour-killing-case.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":215142,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/29\/all-hc-couple-accused-of-murder-and-sentenced-to-death-by-sessions-court-acquitted-for-prosecutions-failure-to-prove-guilt-beyond-reasonable-doubt\/","url_meta":{"origin":333366,"position":3},"title":"All HC | Couple accused of murder – sentenced to death by Sessions Court, acquitted for prosecution\u2019s failure to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"May 29, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court: A Division Bench of Ramesh Sinha and Dinesh Kumar Singh-I, JJ. allowed the appeal filed by a couple accused of murder, against the trial court\u2019s order sentencing them to death for the said offence; and set aside the death reference made by the trial court. In the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":21327,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/10\/17\/double-death-sentence-and-double-life-imprisonment-in-rape-and-murder-case-confirmed\/","url_meta":{"origin":333366,"position":4},"title":"Double death sentence and double life imprisonment in rape and murder case, confirmed","author":"Sucheta","date":"October 17, 2015","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court: In a first sentencing of its kind, a bench comprising of Bhushan Gavai and Prasanna Varale, JJ. confirmed double death sentence and double life imprisonment in a case of rape and murder of a two year old girl by her uncle. The sentence was awarded under Section\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":269433,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/02\/rape-murder-physically-mentally-challenged-child-pocso-murder-of-inmate-death-sentence-confirmed-supreme-court-india-legal-updates-research-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":333366,"position":5},"title":"Man rapes and murders a 7-year-old physically and mentally challenged girl; kills fellow inmate after conviction. SC confirms death sentence\u00a0","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"July 2, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cWe could only wonder what more of criminal activity would qualify as blemish, if not the involvement and conviction in a case of murder of a fellow jail inmate!\"","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/Man-rapes-and-murders-a-7-year-old-physically-and-mentally-challenged-girl-kills-fellow-inmate-after-conviction.-Supreme-Court-confirms-death-sentence.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/Man-rapes-and-murders-a-7-year-old-physically-and-mentally-challenged-girl-kills-fellow-inmate-after-conviction.-Supreme-Court-confirms-death-sentence.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/Man-rapes-and-murders-a-7-year-old-physically-and-mentally-challenged-girl-kills-fellow-inmate-after-conviction.-Supreme-Court-confirms-death-sentence.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/Man-rapes-and-murders-a-7-year-old-physically-and-mentally-challenged-girl-kills-fellow-inmate-after-conviction.-Supreme-Court-confirms-death-sentence.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/Man-rapes-and-murders-a-7-year-old-physically-and-mentally-challenged-girl-kills-fellow-inmate-after-conviction.-Supreme-Court-confirms-death-sentence.png?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/333366","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=333366"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/333366\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/333376"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=333366"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=333366"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=333366"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}