{"id":333346,"date":"2024-10-18T16:00:46","date_gmt":"2024-10-18T10:30:46","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=333346"},"modified":"2024-10-23T14:35:25","modified_gmt":"2024-10-23T09:05:25","slug":"bomhc-dismisses-appeal-by-new-india-assurance-co-janus-aviation-p-ltd-for-recovery-of-31-million","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/18\/bomhc-dismisses-appeal-by-new-india-assurance-co-janus-aviation-p-ltd-for-recovery-of-31-million\/","title":{"rendered":"Bombay HC dismisses appeal by New India Assurance Company against ground handling company Janus Aviation for recovery of $31 million"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Bombay High Court:<\/span> The issue in the present appeal was “whether the suit filed by the New India Assurance Company Limited along with four other Insurance Companies against respondent-Janus Aviation Pvt. Ltd. for subrogated recovery of an amount of USD 31,77,696.98 along with pendente lite and future interest would lie on the commercial division under the Commercial Courts Act, 2015<\/a> (‘2015 Act’)?”<\/span>. The Division Bench of Bharati Dangre and Abhay J. Mantri, JJ., observed that as there was absence of privity of contract between respondent and Interglobe Aviation Limited (Indigo), the Court dismissed the appeal and held that there was no fault with the impugned order as the present case did not arise of the agreement of insurance or reinsurance, as given under 2(1)(c)(x)<\/a> of the 2015 Act<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Appellants submitted that they were entitled for damages from respondent, who was engaged in business of providing ground handling services at Airport for losses suffered by them due to its negligence and as the dispute in the suit arose out of an insurance agreement, it was to be considered as a commercial dispute in terms of Section 2(c)(xx)<\/a> of the 2015 Act<\/a>. The suit was filed against respondent on account of the amount that was repaid by Appellants 1 to 5 to Interglobe Aviation Limited (Indigo) on account of the damages suffered by Indigo’s Airline, in an accident caused due to the alleged negligence of respondent at Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar International Airport, Nagpur on 26-05-2018.<\/p>\n

Appellants insured Indigo’s aircraft, including the aircraft involved in the incident, vide policies “Airline Hull” (including spares) & Liability Insurance” and “Aviation Hull Deductible Insurance” to the percentage of insurance shared by Appellants 1 to 5.<\/p>\n

On 26-05-2018, an aircraft of Indigo Airlines-ATR-72-600 was parked at Bay No. 4 at the Nagpur Airport and was ready to be operated between Nagpur to Hyderabad and it was alleged that respondent was operating the said Airport and was responsible for providing Ground Handling Services to Go Air and Air Asia. Respondent had parked their passenger step ladders parked at the Ground Service Department area and Indigo was not availing ground handling services from respondent. Thus, respondent was under an obligation to act only towards the companies to which it was providing the services operating at the Airport. However, weather warning was received by the Airport Operation Command Centre from Air Traffic Control, and there was a storm and after the passing of the storm, the aircraft remained parked stationary at Bay No. 4 but the ladder belonging to respondent was blown by wind and struck the left wing trailing edge of the aircraft, causing considerable damage to it, as a result of which, the aircraft could not take off and the passengers were required to be offloaded.<\/p>\n

The Safety Investigation Coordinator along with respondent, the representatives of the airport authorities Mihan India Limited and Indigo’s flight safety and ramp safety representatives carried out a detailed investigation of the incident and a report was furnished analyzing the probable cause of the incident as being the non-operational equipments in the parking area without being safely secured. A legal notice was served on respondent on 24-01-2020 as respondent did not pay any heed to its liability, where it was alleged that appellants suffered substantial loss of USD 31,77,696.98 due to sole negligence of respondent and respondent was accused of wilful neglect of its obligation and liability, thus, the suit for subrogated recovery for realization of the amount due to appellants was instituted.<\/p>\n

The Court observed that the lower court held that there was no privity of contract between Indigo and respondent in respect of the insurance or reinsurance and there was no agreement between appellants and respondent about any insurance or reinsurance, thus, the application filed under Order VII<\/a>, Rule 10<\/a> of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908<\/a> was allowed.<\/p>\n

The lower court referred to the clause “arising out of transactions relating to aircraft, aircraft engines, aircraft equipments and helicopters, including sales, leasing and financing of the same” and concluded that respondent was right in his contentions that a claim for damages caused to the aircraft would not fall within the said clause.<\/p>\n

The Court relied on Ambalal Sarabhai Enterprises Ltd.<\/span> v. K.S. Infraspace LLP<\/span>, (2020) 15 SCC 585<\/a> and opined that only those disputes which were commercial disputes within the meaning of Section 2(1)(c)<\/a> of the 2015 Act<\/a> could be entertained by the Commercial Courts or the Commercial Division and Commercial Appellate Division of High Courts.<\/p>\n

The Court held that the entries should be strictly construed in the order under challenge in the present case and as there was absence of privity of contract between respondent and Indigo, the Court dismissed the appeal and held that there was no fault with the impugned order as the present case did not arise of the agreement of insurance or reinsurance, as given under 2(1)(c)(x)<\/a> of the 2015 Act<\/a>.<\/p>\n

[New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Janus Aviation Pvt. Ltd., 2024 SCC OnLine Bom 3282<\/a>, decided on 10-10-2024<\/span>]<\/p>\n\n

Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n

For the Appellants:<\/span> Ritesh Dawda, Advocate<\/p>\n

For the Respondent:<\/span> Deoul Pathak, Advocate i\/b Ishaan Chhayya, Advocate<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Only the disputes which are commercial disputes within the meaning of Section 2(1)(c) of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 can be entertained by Commercial Courts or Commercial Division and Commercial Appellate Division of High Courts.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":314919,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[74228,2569,39498,36639,74226,40324,74227,71115,67988,55849],"class_list":["post-333346","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-31-million","tag-Bombay_High_Court","tag-commercial-courts-act-2015","tag-commercial-dispute","tag-ground-handling-company","tag-indigo","tag-janus-aviation-pvt-ltd","tag-justice-abhay-j-mantri","tag-justice-bharati-dangre","tag-new-india-assurance-company"],"yoast_head":"\nBombay HC dismisses appeal by New India Assurance Co. against ground handling company Janus Aviation for recovery of $31 million | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Bombay High Court dismissed appeal by New India Assurance Company against ground handling company Janus Aviation Pvt. Ltd. for recovery of USD 31,77,696.98.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/18\/bomhc-dismisses-appeal-by-new-india-assurance-co-janus-aviation-p-ltd-for-recovery-of-31-million\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Bombay HC dismisses appeal by New India Assurance Company against ground handling company Janus Aviation for recovery of $31 million\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Bombay High Court dismissed appeal by New India Assurance Company against ground handling company Janus Aviation Pvt. Ltd. for recovery of USD 31,77,696.98.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/18\/bomhc-dismisses-appeal-by-new-india-assurance-co-janus-aviation-p-ltd-for-recovery-of-31-million\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-10-18T10:30:46+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-10-23T09:05:25+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"591\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Simranjeet\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Bombay HC dismisses appeal by New India Assurance Company against ground handling company Janus Aviation for recovery of $31 million\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Simranjeet\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/18\/bomhc-dismisses-appeal-by-new-india-assurance-co-janus-aviation-p-ltd-for-recovery-of-31-million\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/18\/bomhc-dismisses-appeal-by-new-india-assurance-co-janus-aviation-p-ltd-for-recovery-of-31-million\/\",\"name\":\"Bombay HC dismisses appeal by New India Assurance Co. against ground handling company Janus Aviation for recovery of $31 million | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/18\/bomhc-dismisses-appeal-by-new-india-assurance-co-janus-aviation-p-ltd-for-recovery-of-31-million\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/18\/bomhc-dismisses-appeal-by-new-india-assurance-co-janus-aviation-p-ltd-for-recovery-of-31-million\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-10-18T10:30:46+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-10-23T09:05:25+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/aaee99423671d3377042373c5dcdabbd\"},\"description\":\"Bombay High Court dismissed appeal by New India Assurance Company against ground handling company Janus Aviation Pvt. Ltd. for recovery of USD 31,77,696.98.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/18\/bomhc-dismisses-appeal-by-new-india-assurance-co-janus-aviation-p-ltd-for-recovery-of-31-million\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/18\/bomhc-dismisses-appeal-by-new-india-assurance-co-janus-aviation-p-ltd-for-recovery-of-31-million\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/18\/bomhc-dismisses-appeal-by-new-india-assurance-co-janus-aviation-p-ltd-for-recovery-of-31-million\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp\",\"width\":887,\"height\":591,\"caption\":\"Bombay High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/18\/bomhc-dismisses-appeal-by-new-india-assurance-co-janus-aviation-p-ltd-for-recovery-of-31-million\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Bombay HC dismisses appeal by New India Assurance Company against ground handling company Janus Aviation for recovery of $31 million\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/aaee99423671d3377042373c5dcdabbd\",\"name\":\"Simranjeet\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/03d92c7ef8267a8c57730c194d10ea045f0dc6cb00ce27a633a2e25adccce1c9?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/03d92c7ef8267a8c57730c194d10ea045f0dc6cb00ce27a633a2e25adccce1c9?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Simranjeet\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Bombay HC dismisses appeal by New India Assurance Co. against ground handling company Janus Aviation for recovery of $31 million | SCC Times","description":"Bombay High Court dismissed appeal by New India Assurance Company against ground handling company Janus Aviation Pvt. Ltd. for recovery of USD 31,77,696.98.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/18\/bomhc-dismisses-appeal-by-new-india-assurance-co-janus-aviation-p-ltd-for-recovery-of-31-million\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Bombay HC dismisses appeal by New India Assurance Company against ground handling company Janus Aviation for recovery of $31 million","og_description":"Bombay High Court dismissed appeal by New India Assurance Company against ground handling company Janus Aviation Pvt. Ltd. for recovery of USD 31,77,696.98.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/18\/bomhc-dismisses-appeal-by-new-india-assurance-co-janus-aviation-p-ltd-for-recovery-of-31-million\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2024-10-18T10:30:46+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-10-23T09:05:25+00:00","og_image":[{"width":887,"height":591,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Simranjeet","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Bombay HC dismisses appeal by New India Assurance Company against ground handling company Janus Aviation for recovery of $31 million","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Simranjeet","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/18\/bomhc-dismisses-appeal-by-new-india-assurance-co-janus-aviation-p-ltd-for-recovery-of-31-million\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/18\/bomhc-dismisses-appeal-by-new-india-assurance-co-janus-aviation-p-ltd-for-recovery-of-31-million\/","name":"Bombay HC dismisses appeal by New India Assurance Co. against ground handling company Janus Aviation for recovery of $31 million | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/18\/bomhc-dismisses-appeal-by-new-india-assurance-co-janus-aviation-p-ltd-for-recovery-of-31-million\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/18\/bomhc-dismisses-appeal-by-new-india-assurance-co-janus-aviation-p-ltd-for-recovery-of-31-million\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp","datePublished":"2024-10-18T10:30:46+00:00","dateModified":"2024-10-23T09:05:25+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/aaee99423671d3377042373c5dcdabbd"},"description":"Bombay High Court dismissed appeal by New India Assurance Company against ground handling company Janus Aviation Pvt. Ltd. for recovery of USD 31,77,696.98.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/18\/bomhc-dismisses-appeal-by-new-india-assurance-co-janus-aviation-p-ltd-for-recovery-of-31-million\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/18\/bomhc-dismisses-appeal-by-new-india-assurance-co-janus-aviation-p-ltd-for-recovery-of-31-million\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/18\/bomhc-dismisses-appeal-by-new-india-assurance-co-janus-aviation-p-ltd-for-recovery-of-31-million\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp","width":887,"height":591,"caption":"Bombay High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/18\/bomhc-dismisses-appeal-by-new-india-assurance-co-janus-aviation-p-ltd-for-recovery-of-31-million\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Bombay HC dismisses appeal by New India Assurance Company against ground handling company Janus Aviation for recovery of $31 million"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/aaee99423671d3377042373c5dcdabbd","name":"Simranjeet","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/03d92c7ef8267a8c57730c194d10ea045f0dc6cb00ce27a633a2e25adccce1c9?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/03d92c7ef8267a8c57730c194d10ea045f0dc6cb00ce27a633a2e25adccce1c9?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Simranjeet"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":297831,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/27\/bombay-hc-upholds-it-return-accident-compensation-financial-year-prior-death\/","url_meta":{"origin":333346,"position":0},"title":"Motor Vehicle Accident Claim | Bombay HC upholds consideration of IT return for Financial Year before death for calculating deceased’s income","author":"Ridhi","date":"July 27, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"New India Assurance Company argued that IT returns of 2014-15 could not be considered because it was filed after the deceased's death, while the Court regarded the same as a \u2018misconceived interpretation\u2019.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"bombay high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/bombay-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/bombay-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/bombay-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/bombay-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":281153,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/06\/bombay-high-court-appoints-arbitrator-in-case-where-arbitration-clause-tax-invoice-legalnew-legalresearch-legalawareness\/","url_meta":{"origin":333346,"position":1},"title":"Bombay High Court analyses whether \u2018referring disputes to a sole arbitrator\u2019 printed at the back of the tax invoice amount to an arbitration clause","author":"Editor","date":"January 6, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Any document in writing exchanged between the parties which provide a record of the agreement and in respect of which there is no denial by the other side, would squarely fall within the ambit of Section 7 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 and would amount to an arbitration\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/Bombay-High-Court-1.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":328349,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/08\/bomhc-takes-suo-motu-cognizance-nagpur-airports-daily-closure-8-hours\/","url_meta":{"origin":333346,"position":2},"title":"Bombay High Court takes suo motu cognizance of Nagpur Airport\u2019s daily closure for 8 hours","author":"Simranjeet","date":"August 8, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court appointed Advocate Kartik N Shukul as an Amicus to assist the Court and requested him to frame an appropriate petition within a period of one week from the date of the present order.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Bombay High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":288841,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/08\/bombay-hc-discharges-in-376-false-promise-of-marriage-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":333346,"position":3},"title":"Cases where relationship turns sour cannot be inferred that the physical relationship established on every occasion was against will; Bombay High Court discharges accused in false promise of marriage","author":"Ridhi","date":"April 8, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court commented that refusal to discharge the accused merely with an observation that intercourse was forcible at some time cannot be said to be a justified exercise of power.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Bombay High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-581.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-581.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-581.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-581.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":269454,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/02\/bombay-high-court-nature-of-activities-conducted-by-bcci-are-commercial-in-nature-liable-to-pay-employees-contribution-under-esi-act-1948\/","url_meta":{"origin":333346,"position":4},"title":"Bombay High Court| Nature of activities conducted by BCCI are commercial in nature, liable to pay employees contribution under ESI Act, 1948","author":"Editor","date":"July 2, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court: Bharati Dangre, J. dismissed an appeal which was filed by Board of Control for Cricket of India (\u2018BCCI'), being aggrieved by the impugned judgment and order passed by the Employees Insurance Court at Bombay (ESI Court) dated 09-09-2021 where BCCI was held to be under the ambit\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Bombay High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":293054,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/25\/supreme-court-judge-justice-abhay-s-oka-know-thy-judge-scc-blog-legal-research-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":333346,"position":5},"title":"Know Thy Judge | Supreme Court of India: Justice Abhay Shreeniwas Oka","author":"Ritu","date":"May 25, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Looking into Justice Abhay S. Oka\u2019s life, career and important judgments which have been instrumental in protecting the rights of marginalized communities and promoting freedom of expression, thereby making him a harbinger of social change and preserver of administrative accountability.","rel":"","context":"In "Know thy Judge"","block_context":{"text":"Know thy Judge","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/judges-information\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"justice abhay s. oka","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/justice-abhay-s.-oka.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/justice-abhay-s.-oka.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/justice-abhay-s.-oka.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/justice-abhay-s.-oka.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/333346","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=333346"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/333346\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/314919"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=333346"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=333346"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=333346"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}