{"id":333052,"date":"2024-10-15T18:00:33","date_gmt":"2024-10-15T12:30:33","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=333052"},"modified":"2024-10-24T10:40:17","modified_gmt":"2024-10-24T05:10:17","slug":"blind-rejection-of-license-transfer-request-without-provision-violates-principles-of-equity-justice-good-conscience-rajasthan-high-court-scc-times","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/15\/blind-rejection-of-license-transfer-request-without-provision-violates-principles-of-equity-justice-good-conscience-rajasthan-high-court-scc-times\/","title":{"rendered":"Blind rejection of License transfer request without provision violates principles of Equity, Justice & Good Conscience: Rajasthan High Court"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Rajasthan High Court:<\/span> In a writ Petition challenging the rejection of the application for transfer of Motor Driving School license, a single-judge bench of Rekha Borana, J., while balancing legal and equitable principles, set aside the blind rejection of the License transfer application. The Court affirmed that “when no positive law is discernible, Courts turn to equity as a source of applicable law”<\/span> and directed the respondent authorities to reconsider the petitioner’s application for license transfer.<\/p>\n

In the instant matter, the petitioner’s late husband was granted a license to run a motor driving school and the same was valid until 2027. Upon his death in June 2023, the petitioner sought to transfer the license in her name. Her application was rejected on the grounds that neither the Central Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989<\/a>, nor the Motor Driving School Registration Scheme, 2018, provided for such a transfer. After there was no response to her initial application, the petitioner filed a writ petition, resulting in an order for the respondent to consider her application. However, the respondent again rejected her application, prompting the present writ petition. The main issue in the case in hand is —<\/p>\n

    \n
  1. \n

    Whether the rejection of the application for transfer of the motor driving school license was justified in the absence of a provision for such a transfer?<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  2. \n

    Whether the Court could grant equitable relief in the absence of a statutory provision for license transfer upon the death of a licensee?<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    The petitioner contended that although no express provision exists for the transfer of the license, there is also no provision for its automatic cancellation upon the licensee’s death. It was argued that as a qualified legal heir, she should be allowed to take over the license, and equitable principles should guide the Court’s decision. The petitioner cited V. Krishnasamy<\/span> v. Licensing Authority-cum-Regional Transport Officer<\/span>, Writ Petition No.29797 of 2008, decided on 20-01-2009, where the Madras High Court held that when a legal heir fulfills the necessary qualifications, the licensing authority should consider license transmission. The petitioner also referred to a circular issued by the Government of Uttar Pradesh that allows for license transfers to successors. However, the Additional Advocate General representing the State contended that the Motor Driving School Registration Scheme, 2018 did not provide for license transfer and that the petitioner should reapply for a license under the amended rules.<\/p>\n

    The Court referred to Central Council for Research in Ayurvedic Sciences<\/span> v. Bikartan Das<\/span>, (2023) SCC OnLine SC 996<\/a>, where the Supreme Court held that “the High Court would be failing in its duty if it does not notice equitable consideration and mould the final order in exercise of its extraordinary jurisdiction. Any other approach would render the High Court a normal court of appeal which it is not.”<\/span>, M. Siddiq<\/span> v. Mahant Suresh Das<\/span>, (2020) 5 SCC 1<\/a>, where it was held that “Courts in India have long availed of the principles of justice, good conscience and equity to supplement the incompleteness or inapplicability of the letter of the law with the ground realities of legal disputes to do justice between the parties.”<\/span> and SS. Bola<\/span> v. B.D. Sardana<\/span>, (1997) 8 SCC 522<\/a>, where it was held that “equity steps to where law has left yawning gap.”<\/span> The Court also referred to V. Krishnaswamy<\/span> (Supra), wherein in a similar situation, the High Court directed the State authorities to decide the application of the legal representative since the same could not have been rejected just because there existed no provision for transfer of the license in the favor of the legal representative of the license holder. The Court further noted that the State of Uttar Pradesh had also issued a Circular wherein a specific provision for transfer of license in favor of one of the successors\/legal representatives on death of licensee has been provided.<\/p>\n

    The Court highlighted that neither the Central Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989<\/a> nor Motor Driving School Registration Scheme, 2018 provided for automatic cancellation of the license on the licensee’s death, therefore, the licensing authority’s approach deems inequitable. The Court emphasised on the importance of balancing equities and ensuring justice, relying on principles of justice, good conscience, and equity in the absence of specific statutory provisions.<\/p>\n

    The Court held that the rejection of the petitioner’s application solely based on the absence of a transfer provision is unjustified and impressible. The Court quashed the impugned order and directed the respondent authorities to reconsider the petitioner’s application for license transfer. The Court asserted that if the petitioner is found qualified under Rule 24 of the Central Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989<\/a>, the license should be transferred to her and if not, the authorities could act in accordance with the law. The Court also urged the State of Rajasthan to consider introducing provisions for the transfer of licenses to legal heirs in the interest of public welfare.<\/p>\n

    [Bhanwri<\/span> v. State of Rajasthan<\/span>, 2024 SCC OnLine Raj 2964<\/a>, Decided on 07-10-2024<\/span>]<\/p>\n\n

    Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n

    Mr. Vivek Firoda, Counsel for the Petitioner<\/p>\n

    Mr. Sajjan Singh Rathore, AAG with Mr. Rajendra Singh, Counsel for the Respondents<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

    The Court advised the State of Rajasthan to amend the Motor Driving School Registration Scheme, 2018 to include provisions for license transfer to legal heirs.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67514,"featured_media":314824,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[74089,16841,38783,43683,74091,70792,74093,74090,74092,3391,2575,54674],"class_list":["post-333052","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-blind-rejection","tag-central-motor-vehicles-rules","tag-equitable-relief","tag-equity","tag-justice-good-conscience","tag-justice-rekha-borana","tag-legal-successor","tag-license-transfer-application","tag-motor-driving-school-registration-scheme","tag-public_interest","tag-Rajasthan_High_Court","tag-state-of-rajasthan"],"yoast_head":"\nBlind rejection of License transfer request without provision violates principles of Equity, Justice & Good Conscience: Rajasthan High Court | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Rajasthan High Court held that blind rejection of License transfer application without provision violates principles of Equity, Justice & Good Conscience.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/15\/blind-rejection-of-license-transfer-request-without-provision-violates-principles-of-equity-justice-good-conscience-rajasthan-high-court-scc-times\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Blind rejection of License transfer request without provision violates principles of Equity, Justice & Good Conscience: Rajasthan High Court\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Rajasthan High Court held that blind rejection of License transfer application without provision violates principles of Equity, Justice & Good Conscience.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/15\/blind-rejection-of-license-transfer-request-without-provision-violates-principles-of-equity-justice-good-conscience-rajasthan-high-court-scc-times\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-10-15T12:30:33+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-10-24T05:10:17+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"591\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Blind rejection of License transfer request without provision violates principles of Equity, Justice & Good Conscience: Rajasthan High Court\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/15\/blind-rejection-of-license-transfer-request-without-provision-violates-principles-of-equity-justice-good-conscience-rajasthan-high-court-scc-times\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/15\/blind-rejection-of-license-transfer-request-without-provision-violates-principles-of-equity-justice-good-conscience-rajasthan-high-court-scc-times\/\",\"name\":\"Blind rejection of License transfer request without provision violates principles of Equity, Justice & Good Conscience: Rajasthan High Court | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/15\/blind-rejection-of-license-transfer-request-without-provision-violates-principles-of-equity-justice-good-conscience-rajasthan-high-court-scc-times\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/15\/blind-rejection-of-license-transfer-request-without-provision-violates-principles-of-equity-justice-good-conscience-rajasthan-high-court-scc-times\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-10-15T12:30:33+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-10-24T05:10:17+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\"},\"description\":\"Rajasthan High Court held that blind rejection of License transfer application without provision violates principles of Equity, Justice & Good Conscience.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/15\/blind-rejection-of-license-transfer-request-without-provision-violates-principles-of-equity-justice-good-conscience-rajasthan-high-court-scc-times\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/15\/blind-rejection-of-license-transfer-request-without-provision-violates-principles-of-equity-justice-good-conscience-rajasthan-high-court-scc-times\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/15\/blind-rejection-of-license-transfer-request-without-provision-violates-principles-of-equity-justice-good-conscience-rajasthan-high-court-scc-times\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp\",\"width\":887,\"height\":591,\"caption\":\"Rajasthan High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/15\/blind-rejection-of-license-transfer-request-without-provision-violates-principles-of-equity-justice-good-conscience-rajasthan-high-court-scc-times\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Blind rejection of License transfer request without provision violates principles of Equity, Justice & Good Conscience: Rajasthan High Court\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\",\"name\":\"Ritu\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Ritu\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_7\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Blind rejection of License transfer request without provision violates principles of Equity, Justice & Good Conscience: Rajasthan High Court | SCC Times","description":"Rajasthan High Court held that blind rejection of License transfer application without provision violates principles of Equity, Justice & Good Conscience.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/15\/blind-rejection-of-license-transfer-request-without-provision-violates-principles-of-equity-justice-good-conscience-rajasthan-high-court-scc-times\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Blind rejection of License transfer request without provision violates principles of Equity, Justice & Good Conscience: Rajasthan High Court","og_description":"Rajasthan High Court held that blind rejection of License transfer application without provision violates principles of Equity, Justice & Good Conscience.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/15\/blind-rejection-of-license-transfer-request-without-provision-violates-principles-of-equity-justice-good-conscience-rajasthan-high-court-scc-times\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2024-10-15T12:30:33+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-10-24T05:10:17+00:00","og_image":[{"width":887,"height":591,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Ritu","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Blind rejection of License transfer request without provision violates principles of Equity, Justice & Good Conscience: Rajasthan High Court","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Ritu","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/15\/blind-rejection-of-license-transfer-request-without-provision-violates-principles-of-equity-justice-good-conscience-rajasthan-high-court-scc-times\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/15\/blind-rejection-of-license-transfer-request-without-provision-violates-principles-of-equity-justice-good-conscience-rajasthan-high-court-scc-times\/","name":"Blind rejection of License transfer request without provision violates principles of Equity, Justice & Good Conscience: Rajasthan High Court | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/15\/blind-rejection-of-license-transfer-request-without-provision-violates-principles-of-equity-justice-good-conscience-rajasthan-high-court-scc-times\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/15\/blind-rejection-of-license-transfer-request-without-provision-violates-principles-of-equity-justice-good-conscience-rajasthan-high-court-scc-times\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp","datePublished":"2024-10-15T12:30:33+00:00","dateModified":"2024-10-24T05:10:17+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9"},"description":"Rajasthan High Court held that blind rejection of License transfer application without provision violates principles of Equity, Justice & Good Conscience.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/15\/blind-rejection-of-license-transfer-request-without-provision-violates-principles-of-equity-justice-good-conscience-rajasthan-high-court-scc-times\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/15\/blind-rejection-of-license-transfer-request-without-provision-violates-principles-of-equity-justice-good-conscience-rajasthan-high-court-scc-times\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/15\/blind-rejection-of-license-transfer-request-without-provision-violates-principles-of-equity-justice-good-conscience-rajasthan-high-court-scc-times\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp","width":887,"height":591,"caption":"Rajasthan High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/15\/blind-rejection-of-license-transfer-request-without-provision-violates-principles-of-equity-justice-good-conscience-rajasthan-high-court-scc-times\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Blind rejection of License transfer request without provision violates principles of Equity, Justice & Good Conscience: Rajasthan High Court"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9","name":"Ritu","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Ritu"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_7\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":256238,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/29\/two-judges-appointed-to-rajasthan-high-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":333052,"position":0},"title":"Two Judges appointed to Rajasthan High Court","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 29, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Appointment of Judges | Rajasthan High Court Two Judges appointed to Rajasthan High Court: Kumari Rekha Borana Sameer Jain Ministry of Law and Justice [Notification dt. 28-10-2021]","rel":"","context":"In "Appointments & Transfers"","block_context":{"text":"Appointments & Transfers","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/appointments\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":334119,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/29\/conflicting-interim-orders-result-in-dual-posting-rajasthan-high-court-directs-avvnl-to-issue-fresh-transfer-order-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":333052,"position":1},"title":"Two employees on same post? Rajasthan High Court directs AVVNL to issue fresh transfer order amid conflicting interim orders","author":"Ritu","date":"October 29, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court opined that the impugned orders resulted in a situation where the Department has been forced to continue with two employees on the same post and this situation cannot be permitted to be continued.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Rajasthan High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":329761,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/31\/no-priority-orders-without-case-statistics-raj-hc-cautions-against-interference-with-trial-courts-cause-list-and-priorities-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":333052,"position":2},"title":"\u2018No Priority orders without Case Statistics\u2019; Rajasthan High Court cautions against interference with trial court\u2019s cause list and priorities","author":"Ritu","date":"August 31, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cOrder of priority hearing, if granted, place a class of litigants, who move the Court in a separate and preferential category whereas other cases which may be of similar or great antiquity and urgency are left to be decided in the normal channel.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Rajasthan High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":326188,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/10\/raj-hc-stays-acquisition-of-land-for-railway-line-in-rajsamand-district-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":333052,"position":3},"title":"Rajasthan High Court stays acquisition of land for new railway line in Rajsamand District","author":"Ritu","date":"July 10, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The petitioners alleged that the objections were decided without affording them a proper opportunity of hearing, relying solely on a newspaper notice.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Rajasthan High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":367063,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/18\/raj-hc-establishment-of-dharmshala-on-private-land-cannot-be-deemed-a-charitable-purchases\/","url_meta":{"origin":333052,"position":4},"title":"Establishment of Dharmshala on private land cannot be deemed a charitable purchase: Rajasthan High Court","author":"Editor","date":"November 18, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cA bare perusal of the Patta reflects that the land in question was sold out for Rs.312 to Baijnath and Sargarmal in the year 1916. The said Patta nowhere reflects that the land was sold out at a concessional rate. Further, there is no stipulation in the said Patta regarding\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Dharmshala on private land not charitable","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Dharmshala-on-private-land-not-charitable.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Dharmshala-on-private-land-not-charitable.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Dharmshala-on-private-land-not-charitable.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Dharmshala-on-private-land-not-charitable.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":215215,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/31\/raj-hc-license-cannot-be-issued-for-driving-any-kind-of-vehicle-to-illiterate-person-as-he-is-virtually-a-menace-for-pedestrians\/","url_meta":{"origin":333052,"position":5},"title":"Raj HC | License cannot be issued for driving any kind of vehicle to illiterate person as he is virtually a menace for pedestrians","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"May 31, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Rajasthan High Court: Sanjeev Prakash Sharma, J. while deciding a petition stated that \u201cMotor Vehicle Rules are required to be framed not only for the benefit of persons who seek license but also taking into consideration the public who are using the roads\u201d. The present petition has been filed stating\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/333052","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67514"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=333052"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/333052\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/314824"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=333052"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=333052"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=333052"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}