{"id":332718,"date":"2024-10-09T11:30:49","date_gmt":"2024-10-09T06:00:49","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=332718"},"modified":"2024-10-17T11:05:15","modified_gmt":"2024-10-17T05:35:15","slug":"free-paid-certified-final-order-copy-nclt-condonation-of-delay-nclat-sc-legal-news","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/09\/free-paid-certified-final-order-copy-nclt-condonation-of-delay-nclat-sc-legal-news\/","title":{"rendered":"Condonation of delay by NCLAT | Free & paid certified copy of final orders are on the same footing as per Rule 50 of NCLT Rules: SC"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Supreme Court:<\/span> While deliberating over the instant appeal revolving around the interpretation of Rule 50 of National Company Law Tribunal Rules, 2016 (NCLT Rules) and Rule 22 of National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Rules, 2016 (NCLAT Rules); the Division Bench of D.Y. Chandrachud, CJ., and Manoj Misra, JJ., clarified and held that the provisions of Rule 50 of the NCLT Rules, place both the free certified copy of NCLT’s final order as well as the certified copy which is applied for on payment of fees, on the same footing.<\/p>\n

Background and Contentions:<\/h3>\n

SBI instituted an application under Section 7<\/a> of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code 2016<\/a>, against IPCL. NCLT at Hyderabad rejected the petition on the ground of maintainability by an order dated 30-10-2023. The appeal before the NCLAT, Chennai was filed on 2-12-2023. The appellant filed an application for condonation of delay on the ground that the appeal had been lodged with a delay of 3 days beyond the 30-day period prescribed in Section 61(2)<\/a> of IBC, 2016<\/a>.<\/p>\n

There was a split decision between the Judicial and Technical Members of NCLAT in the matter. As per the Judicial Member, the certified copy which was filed by SBI was a “free of cost” copy and hence in the absence of an application for the grant of a certified copy, the delay of 3 days could not be condoned.<\/p>\n

Meanwhile, the Technical Member held that no distinction could be made between certified copies obtained through the payment of fee and a free copy and sufficient cause was shown for condoning the delay of 3 days.<\/p>\n

The divergence was, thereafter, referred to a third Member of the NCLAT who held that the free copy provided under Rule 50 of NCLT Rules cannot be treated as a certified copy which is referred to in Rule 22(2) of NCLAT Rules.<\/p>\n

Counsel for SBI contended that Rule 50 of the NCLT Rules places both the certified copy which is provided free of cost as well as the certified copy which is made available against the payment of costs as indicated in the Schedule of Fees on the same footing. It was urged that as a matter of fact, the free certified copy was made available on 14-11-2023 and the appeal which was filed on 2 —12-2023 was well within the condonable period of 15 days beyond the period of 30 days which is stipulated in Section 61(2)<\/a>, IBC<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Court’s Assessment:<\/h3>\n

Perusing the facts and contentions raised by the parties, the Court distinguished the facts of the instant case with that of V. Nagarajan<\/span> v. SKS Ispat and Power Limited<\/span>, (2022) 2 SCC 244<\/a>.<\/p>\n

The Court observed that in V. Nagarajan (supra)<\/span> the order of the NCLT was dated 31-12-2019 and was uploaded on the website on 12-03-2020. Further, there was a correction in the name of the Judicial Member who passed the order on 20-3-2020. The Supreme Court had held that both the certified copy which is made available free of cost as well as the certified copy, which is made available on the payment of costs, are treated as certified copies for the purpose of Rule 50. A litigant who does not apply for a certified copy cannot then fall back and claim that he was awaiting the grant of a free copy to obviate the bar of limitation.<\/p>\n

The Court noted that in the instant case, the free copy of the NCLT order was made available on 14-11-2023 after the decision of the NCLT was pronounced on 30-10-2023. The appeal was lodged on 2-12-2023. The appeal was lodged with a delay of only 3 days beyond the statutory period of 30 days and, therefore, fell within the condonable period of 15 days. Sufficient cause was shown for condoning the delay of three days.<\/p>\n

The Court further pointed out that Entry 31 of Schedule of Fees prescribed by the NCLT Rules stipulates that the fee for obtaining true certified copies of final orders passed to parties other than the concerned parties under Rule 50 shall be Rs 5 per page. The stipulation of Rupees five per page in Entry 31 excludes “the concerned parties under Rule 50”<\/span>.<\/p>\n

Therefore, with the afore-stated assessment, the Court thus allowed the appeal and set aside the impugned judgment and order of the NCLAT dated 7-5-2024. The delay of 3 days in filing the appeal was condoned and the Court directed that the appeal be restored to the file of NCLAT.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\n

CASE DETAILS<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n<\/colgroup>\n\n\n
\n

Citation:<\/span>
2024 SCC OnLine SC 2731<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n

Appellants :<\/span>
State Bank of India<\/p>\n

Respondents :<\/span>
India Power Corporation Ltd.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

Advocates who appeared in this case<\/p>\n

For Petitioner(s):<\/span>
Mr. Tushar Mehta, SG; Mr. Madhav Kanoria, Adv.; Ms. Surabhi Khattar, Adv. Ms. Neha Shivhare, Adv.; Mr. Sriharsh Raj, Adv.; M\/S. Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas, AOR.<\/p>\n

For Respondent(s):<\/span>
Dr. Abhishek Manu Singhvi, Sr. Adv.; Mr. Anirban Bhattacharya, AOR Mr. Rajeev Chowdhary, Adv.; Ms. Priyanka Bhatt, Adv.; Mr. Pranjit Bhattacharya, Adv.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

CORAM :<\/span><\/p>\n

\n
\n

\"D.Y.
D.Y. Chandrachud, CJ.<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

\"Manoj
Manoj Misra, J.<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Entry 31 of Schedule of Fees prescribed by the NCLT Rules stipulates that the fee for obtaining true certified copies of final orders passed to parties other than the concerned parties under Rule 50 shall be Rs 5 per page. The stipulation of Rupees five per page in Entry 31 excludes “the concerned parties under Rule 50”.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":332719,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,9],"tags":[8991,73880,2552,73878,73876,62409,22014,12521,73877,73879],"class_list":["post-332718","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-supremecourt","tag-appeal","tag-certified-copies-of-order","tag-Condonation_of_delay","tag-final-orders","tag-free-certified-copy","tag-insolvency-and-bankruptcy-laws","tag-nclat","tag-nclt","tag-paid-certified-copy","tag-restoration-of-appeal"],"yoast_head":"\nFree & paid certified copy of final orders are on the same footing as per Rule 50 of NCLT Rules: SC<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Condonation of delay by NCLAT | Free & paid certified copy of final NCLT orders are on the same footing as per Rule 50 of NCLT Rules: SC clarifies.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/09\/free-paid-certified-final-order-copy-nclt-condonation-of-delay-nclat-sc-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Condonation of delay by NCLAT | Free & paid certified copy of final orders are on the same footing as per Rule 50 of NCLT Rules: SC\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Condonation of delay by NCLAT | Free & paid certified copy of final NCLT orders are on the same footing as per Rule 50 of NCLT Rules: SC clarifies.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/09\/free-paid-certified-final-order-copy-nclt-condonation-of-delay-nclat-sc-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-10-09T06:00:49+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-10-17T05:35:15+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/free-certified-copy-final-order-paid-certified-copy.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Condonation of delay by NCLAT | Free & paid certified copy of final orders are on the same footing as per Rule 50 of NCLT Rules: SC\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/09\/free-paid-certified-final-order-copy-nclt-condonation-of-delay-nclat-sc-legal-news\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/09\/free-paid-certified-final-order-copy-nclt-condonation-of-delay-nclat-sc-legal-news\/\",\"name\":\"Free & paid certified copy of final orders are on the same footing as per Rule 50 of NCLT Rules: SC\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/09\/free-paid-certified-final-order-copy-nclt-condonation-of-delay-nclat-sc-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/09\/free-paid-certified-final-order-copy-nclt-condonation-of-delay-nclat-sc-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/free-certified-copy-final-order-paid-certified-copy.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-10-09T06:00:49+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-10-17T05:35:15+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\"},\"description\":\"Condonation of delay by NCLAT | Free & paid certified copy of final NCLT orders are on the same footing as per Rule 50 of NCLT Rules: SC clarifies.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/09\/free-paid-certified-final-order-copy-nclt-condonation-of-delay-nclat-sc-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/09\/free-paid-certified-final-order-copy-nclt-condonation-of-delay-nclat-sc-legal-news\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/09\/free-paid-certified-final-order-copy-nclt-condonation-of-delay-nclat-sc-legal-news\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/free-certified-copy-final-order-paid-certified-copy.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/free-certified-copy-final-order-paid-certified-copy.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"Condonation of delay by NCLAT | Free & paid certified copy of final orders are on the same footing as per Rule 50 of NCLT Rules: SC\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/09\/free-paid-certified-final-order-copy-nclt-condonation-of-delay-nclat-sc-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Condonation of delay by NCLAT | Free & paid certified copy of final orders are on the same footing as per Rule 50 of NCLT Rules: SC\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\",\"name\":\"Sucheta\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Sucheta\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Free & paid certified copy of final orders are on the same footing as per Rule 50 of NCLT Rules: SC","description":"Condonation of delay by NCLAT | Free & paid certified copy of final NCLT orders are on the same footing as per Rule 50 of NCLT Rules: SC clarifies.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/09\/free-paid-certified-final-order-copy-nclt-condonation-of-delay-nclat-sc-legal-news\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Condonation of delay by NCLAT | Free & paid certified copy of final orders are on the same footing as per Rule 50 of NCLT Rules: SC","og_description":"Condonation of delay by NCLAT | Free & paid certified copy of final NCLT orders are on the same footing as per Rule 50 of NCLT Rules: SC clarifies.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/09\/free-paid-certified-final-order-copy-nclt-condonation-of-delay-nclat-sc-legal-news\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2024-10-09T06:00:49+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-10-17T05:35:15+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/free-certified-copy-final-order-paid-certified-copy.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Sucheta","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Condonation of delay by NCLAT | Free & paid certified copy of final orders are on the same footing as per Rule 50 of NCLT Rules: SC","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Sucheta","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/09\/free-paid-certified-final-order-copy-nclt-condonation-of-delay-nclat-sc-legal-news\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/09\/free-paid-certified-final-order-copy-nclt-condonation-of-delay-nclat-sc-legal-news\/","name":"Free & paid certified copy of final orders are on the same footing as per Rule 50 of NCLT Rules: SC","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/09\/free-paid-certified-final-order-copy-nclt-condonation-of-delay-nclat-sc-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/09\/free-paid-certified-final-order-copy-nclt-condonation-of-delay-nclat-sc-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/free-certified-copy-final-order-paid-certified-copy.webp","datePublished":"2024-10-09T06:00:49+00:00","dateModified":"2024-10-17T05:35:15+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa"},"description":"Condonation of delay by NCLAT | Free & paid certified copy of final NCLT orders are on the same footing as per Rule 50 of NCLT Rules: SC clarifies.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/09\/free-paid-certified-final-order-copy-nclt-condonation-of-delay-nclat-sc-legal-news\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/09\/free-paid-certified-final-order-copy-nclt-condonation-of-delay-nclat-sc-legal-news\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/09\/free-paid-certified-final-order-copy-nclt-condonation-of-delay-nclat-sc-legal-news\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/free-certified-copy-final-order-paid-certified-copy.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/free-certified-copy-final-order-paid-certified-copy.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"Condonation of delay by NCLAT | Free & paid certified copy of final orders are on the same footing as per Rule 50 of NCLT Rules: SC"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/09\/free-paid-certified-final-order-copy-nclt-condonation-of-delay-nclat-sc-legal-news\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Condonation of delay by NCLAT | Free & paid certified copy of final orders are on the same footing as per Rule 50 of NCLT Rules: SC"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa","name":"Sucheta","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Sucheta"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/free-certified-copy-final-order-paid-certified-copy.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":283000,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/03\/financial-creditor-nclt-corporate-detor-cirp-allowed-appeal-application-condonation-of-delay-nclat-ibc-override-limitation-act-tribunal-no-power-dismissed\/","url_meta":{"origin":332718,"position":0},"title":"NCLAT | IBC overrides Limitation Act; Delay beyond period of 45 days cannot be condoned","author":"Editor","date":"February 3, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"While adjudicating an appeal file with a delay of 55 days, the Tribunal held that S. 238 IBC overrides S. 12 of the Limitation Act, 1963 and therefore this Tribunal does not have power to condone a delay beyond a period of 45 days.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"NCLAT","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-395.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":271865,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/18\/nclat-time-taken-for-preparation-of-the-certified-copy-of-the-order-judgment-excluded-for-limitation-under-section-61-of-the-insolvency-bankruptcy-code-2016\/","url_meta":{"origin":332718,"position":1},"title":"NCLAT | Time taken for preparation of the certified copy of the order\/judgment excluded for limitation under Section 61 of the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016","author":"Editor","date":"August 18, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"National Company Law Appellate Tribunal: Dismissing a time-barred appeal, the Principal Bench of National Company Appellate Tribunal comprising of Ashok Bhushan, J. and Barun Mitra held that the power to condone the delay cannot be exercised exceeding 15 days. The Appellant filed an appeal on 08-07-2022 against the order of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"NCLAT","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/NCLAT_New.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/NCLAT_New.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/NCLAT_New.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/NCLAT_New.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/NCLAT_New.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":254285,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/09\/16\/supreme-court-on-preferring-an-appeal-before-nclat-beyond-a-period-of-30-days\/","url_meta":{"origin":332718,"position":2},"title":"Supreme Court on preferring an appeal before NCLAT beyond a period of 30 days: Read the Law [Explained]","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 16, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court of India: The Bench of M.R. Shah and Aniruddha Bose, JJ., observed that, \u201cAppellate Tribunal has jurisdiction or power to condone the delay not exceeding 15 days from the completion of 30 days, the statutory period of limitation.\u201d Aggrieved and dissatisfied with impugned order passed by the National\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":288833,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/08\/nclt-section7-application-admitted-appeal-nclat-delay-beyond-45-days-lack-of-jurisdiction-ibc-section-61-precedent-scc-blog-legal-news-research\/","url_meta":{"origin":332718,"position":3},"title":"NCLAT cannot condone delay beyond 15 days in appeal due to lack of jurisdiction even if fraud has been played","author":"Ritu","date":"April 8, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"National Company Law Appellate Tribunal observed that as per S. 61(2) every appeal must be filed within 30 days before the Appellate Tribunal and the Appellate Tribunal has the jurisdiction to extend the period of 15 days if it is satisfied that there is a sufficient cause for not filing\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"National Company Law Appellate Tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-458.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-458.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-458.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-458.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":280285,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/23\/rule-11-of-nclat-rules-2016-cannot-be-invoked-even-if-there-is-no-provision-in-ibc-to-deal-with-certain-circumstances-nclat\/","url_meta":{"origin":332718,"position":4},"title":"Rule 11 of NCLAT Rules 2016 cannot be invoked even if there is no provision in IBC to deal with certain circumstances: NCLAT","author":"Editor","date":"December 23, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 National Company Law Appellate Tribunal | Dismissing the appeals, a bench comprising of Rakesh Kumar Jain*, J. and Kanthi Narahari (Technical Member) held that Regulation 26(2) of the CIRP Regulations, 2016 being directory cannot override the power of the CoC which can take the final decision accepting or\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"NCLAT","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-395.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":240588,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/12\/nclt-if-an-applicant-finds-the-finding-of-a-judgment-to-be-erroneous-can-he-be-permitted-to-seek-rehearing-of-appeal-under-r-11-of-nclat-rules-2016-tribunal-considers\/","url_meta":{"origin":332718,"position":5},"title":"NCLAT | If an applicant finds the finding of a Judgment to be erroneous, can he be permitted to seek rehearing of appeal under R. 11 of NCLAT Rules, 2016? Tribunal considers","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 12, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"National Company Law Appellate\u00a0Tribunal(NCLAT): The Division Bench of Justice Bansi Lal Bhat (Acting Chairperson) and Shreesha Merla (Technical Member), while addressing the present appeal observed that: Exercise of inherent powers under Rule 11 has limitations and same cannot be enlarged to review the decisions. Company Appeal titled\u00a0Anubhav Anilkumar Agarwal v.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/332718","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=332718"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/332718\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/332719"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=332718"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=332718"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=332718"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}