{"id":332709,"date":"2024-10-09T10:00:51","date_gmt":"2024-10-09T04:30:51","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=332709"},"modified":"2024-10-15T18:18:02","modified_gmt":"2024-10-15T12:48:02","slug":"bci-gag-order-issue-advocates-fundamental-rights-karnataka-hc-legal-news","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/09\/bci-gag-order-issue-advocates-fundamental-rights-karnataka-hc-legal-news\/","title":{"rendered":"Bar Council of India cannot ostensibly pass any gag order which takes away an Advocate\u2019s fundamental right: Karnataka HC"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Karnataka High Court:<\/span> While considering a petition filed by a practicing advocate questioning proceedings initiated by the Bar Council of India in terms of its communication dated 12-04-2024 by which certain restrictions were imposed upon the practice of the petitioner; the Bench of <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">M. Nagaprasanna, J*.<\/span>, held that, the Chairman of the Bar Council of India ostensibly cannot pass any such gag order which takes away the fundamental right of any Advocate. Issuance of gag order is not a power that can be inferred from Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001543876\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">7(1)(g)<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002806286\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Advocates Act, 1961<\/a>. Therefore, the very order directing restraint on an Advocate speaking is <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">prima facie<\/span> contrary to law and is unsustainable.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court further stated that power of the Courts either competent Civil Court or constitutional Court cannot be permitted to be usurped by the Chairman of the Bar Council of India, as was done in the instant case.<\/p>\n<h3>Background:<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In August 2023, Karnataka State Bar Council organized a State Level Advocates Conference at Mysuru. Claiming certain expenditure to have been incurred which were not on record, thereby resulting in misappropriation of funds, the petitioner registered a complaint against Chairman and Vice-Chairman of KSBC.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Subsequently, the BCI issued the impugned order dated 8-4-2024, issued vide Communication dated 12-4-2024, Chairman, BCI directed setting up of an Inquiry Committee and furnishing of relevant financial documents.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">However, the BCI also imposed a temporary restraint\/gag on all Members of the Karnataka State Bar Council or any Advocate from making any further public statements or spreading any information related to the expenditure incurred during the State Level Conference. The Members of the Bar Council of Karnataka were directed to ensure the same.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The petitioner&#8217;s counsel contended that Bar Council of India has no power to pass gag orders, as was passed in the instant case. The fundamental right of the petitioner, i.e., the right to speech was taken away by the impugned order.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Bar Council of India did not send any representatives before the Court.<\/p>\n<h3>Court&#8217;s Assessment:<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court had to consider that whether the Chairman of the Bar Council of India is empowered to pass such gag orders against the fraternity of Advocates at large, ordering them not to speak anything.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">It was pointed out that issuance of gag order would amount to imposing a restraint on the speech of the Advocates. The direction, in the communication, was not against any individual, but against the community of Advocates itself.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court took note of S. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001543837\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">4<\/a> and S. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001543876\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">7<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002806286\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Advocates Act, 1961<\/a>. Section 4 deals with the constitution of Bar Council of India, while Section 7 deals with the functions. The Court observed that Section 7(1)(g) empowers the Bar Council of India, to have general supervision and control over the State Bar Councils.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court opined that General supervision and control, would not clothe with any power to the Bar Council of India, to pass such gag orders, restraining the speech of Advocates or even the members of the Bar Council, <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">as it is general supervision and control and not control over the speaking of Advocates<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court further enumerated several Supreme Court precedents and foreign Court decisions regarding who can issue gag orders and stated that gag orders or orders of restraint or injunction should be passed only when it is necessary to prevent substantial risk, to fairness of a trial. In the absence of any material, the Court also cannot pass any restraint\/gag order.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">With the afore-stated assessment, the Court thus held that the power of passing gag order, exercised by the BCI on all the Advocates on a particular topic, is <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">de hors<\/span> such power that can be exercised under the general supervision and control of the State Bar Council. Hence the Court set aside the impugned order on grounds of unsustainability.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">S. Basavaraj v. Bar Council of India, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/UeCiGUvC\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2024 SCC OnLine Kar 104<\/a>, decided on 27-9-2024<\/span>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000080;\">*Order by Justice M. Nagaprasanna<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">A.R. Goutham, Counsel for petitioner<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">Udaya Holla, Senior counsel appearing a\/w T.G. Ravi, Advocate for respondents 2 and 3<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">The Court further stated that power of the Courts either competent Civil Court or Constitutional Court cannot be permitted to be usurped by the Chairman of the Bar Council of India, as was done in the instant case.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":316069,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[7141,12381,3623,3268,25474,71273,28334,73872,38460,39680],"class_list":["post-332709","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-advocates","tag-bar-council-of-india","tag-freedom_of_speech","tag-Fundamental_Rights","tag-gag-order","tag-justice-m-nagaprasanna","tag-karnataka-high-court","tag-karnataka-state-bar-council","tag-misappropriation","tag-practicing-advocates"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.4 (Yoast SEO v27.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>BCI cannot pass any gag order which takes away an Advocate\u2019s fundamental right: Karnataka HC<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Karnataka HC further stated that power of the Courts cannot be permitted to be usurped by the Chairman of the Bar Council of India, as was done in the instant case.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/09\/bci-gag-order-issue-advocates-fundamental-rights-karnataka-hc-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Bar Council of India cannot ostensibly pass any gag order which takes away an Advocate\u2019s fundamental right: Karnataka HC\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Karnataka HC further stated that power of the Courts cannot be permitted to be usurped by the Chairman of the Bar Council of India, as was done in the instant case.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/09\/bci-gag-order-issue-advocates-fundamental-rights-karnataka-hc-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-10-09T04:30:51+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-10-15T12:48:02+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Karnataka-High-Court-2.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Bar Council of India cannot ostensibly pass any gag order which takes away an Advocate\u2019s fundamental right: Karnataka HC\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/10\\\/09\\\/bci-gag-order-issue-advocates-fundamental-rights-karnataka-hc-legal-news\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/10\\\/09\\\/bci-gag-order-issue-advocates-fundamental-rights-karnataka-hc-legal-news\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Sucheta\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\"},\"headline\":\"Bar Council of India cannot ostensibly pass any gag order which takes away an Advocate\u2019s fundamental right: Karnataka HC\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-10-09T04:30:51+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-10-15T12:48:02+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/10\\\/09\\\/bci-gag-order-issue-advocates-fundamental-rights-karnataka-hc-legal-news\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":699,\"commentCount\":1,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/10\\\/09\\\/bci-gag-order-issue-advocates-fundamental-rights-karnataka-hc-legal-news\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/03\\\/Karnataka-High-Court.webp\",\"keywords\":[\"Advocates\",\"Bar Council of India\",\"freedom of speech\u00a0\",\"Fundamental Rights\",\"Gag order\",\"Justice M. Nagaprasanna\",\"Karnataka High Court\",\"Karnataka State Bar Council\",\"Misappropriation\",\"practicing advocates\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Case Briefs\",\"High Courts\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/10\\\/09\\\/bci-gag-order-issue-advocates-fundamental-rights-karnataka-hc-legal-news\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/10\\\/09\\\/bci-gag-order-issue-advocates-fundamental-rights-karnataka-hc-legal-news\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/10\\\/09\\\/bci-gag-order-issue-advocates-fundamental-rights-karnataka-hc-legal-news\\\/\",\"name\":\"BCI cannot pass any gag order which takes away an Advocate\u2019s fundamental right: Karnataka HC\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/10\\\/09\\\/bci-gag-order-issue-advocates-fundamental-rights-karnataka-hc-legal-news\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/10\\\/09\\\/bci-gag-order-issue-advocates-fundamental-rights-karnataka-hc-legal-news\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/03\\\/Karnataka-High-Court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-10-09T04:30:51+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-10-15T12:48:02+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\"},\"description\":\"Karnataka HC further stated that power of the Courts cannot be permitted to be usurped by the Chairman of the Bar Council of India, as was done in the instant case.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/10\\\/09\\\/bci-gag-order-issue-advocates-fundamental-rights-karnataka-hc-legal-news\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/10\\\/09\\\/bci-gag-order-issue-advocates-fundamental-rights-karnataka-hc-legal-news\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/10\\\/09\\\/bci-gag-order-issue-advocates-fundamental-rights-karnataka-hc-legal-news\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/03\\\/Karnataka-High-Court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/03\\\/Karnataka-High-Court.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"Karnataka High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/10\\\/09\\\/bci-gag-order-issue-advocates-fundamental-rights-karnataka-hc-legal-news\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Bar Council of India cannot ostensibly pass any gag order which takes away an Advocate\u2019s fundamental right: Karnataka HC\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\",\"name\":\"Sucheta\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Sucheta\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/author\\\/legal_editor\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"BCI cannot pass any gag order which takes away an Advocate\u2019s fundamental right: Karnataka HC","description":"Karnataka HC further stated that power of the Courts cannot be permitted to be usurped by the Chairman of the Bar Council of India, as was done in the instant case.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/09\/bci-gag-order-issue-advocates-fundamental-rights-karnataka-hc-legal-news\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Bar Council of India cannot ostensibly pass any gag order which takes away an Advocate\u2019s fundamental right: Karnataka HC","og_description":"Karnataka HC further stated that power of the Courts cannot be permitted to be usurped by the Chairman of the Bar Council of India, as was done in the instant case.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/09\/bci-gag-order-issue-advocates-fundamental-rights-karnataka-hc-legal-news\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2024-10-09T04:30:51+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-10-15T12:48:02+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Karnataka-High-Court-2.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Sucheta","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Bar Council of India cannot ostensibly pass any gag order which takes away an Advocate\u2019s fundamental right: Karnataka HC","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Sucheta","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/09\/bci-gag-order-issue-advocates-fundamental-rights-karnataka-hc-legal-news\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/09\/bci-gag-order-issue-advocates-fundamental-rights-karnataka-hc-legal-news\/"},"author":{"name":"Sucheta","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa"},"headline":"Bar Council of India cannot ostensibly pass any gag order which takes away an Advocate\u2019s fundamental right: Karnataka HC","datePublished":"2024-10-09T04:30:51+00:00","dateModified":"2024-10-15T12:48:02+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/09\/bci-gag-order-issue-advocates-fundamental-rights-karnataka-hc-legal-news\/"},"wordCount":699,"commentCount":1,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/09\/bci-gag-order-issue-advocates-fundamental-rights-karnataka-hc-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Karnataka-High-Court.webp","keywords":["Advocates","Bar Council of India","freedom of speech\u00a0","Fundamental Rights","Gag order","Justice M. Nagaprasanna","Karnataka High Court","Karnataka State Bar Council","Misappropriation","practicing advocates"],"articleSection":["Case Briefs","High Courts"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/09\/bci-gag-order-issue-advocates-fundamental-rights-karnataka-hc-legal-news\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/09\/bci-gag-order-issue-advocates-fundamental-rights-karnataka-hc-legal-news\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/09\/bci-gag-order-issue-advocates-fundamental-rights-karnataka-hc-legal-news\/","name":"BCI cannot pass any gag order which takes away an Advocate\u2019s fundamental right: Karnataka HC","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/09\/bci-gag-order-issue-advocates-fundamental-rights-karnataka-hc-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/09\/bci-gag-order-issue-advocates-fundamental-rights-karnataka-hc-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Karnataka-High-Court.webp","datePublished":"2024-10-09T04:30:51+00:00","dateModified":"2024-10-15T12:48:02+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa"},"description":"Karnataka HC further stated that power of the Courts cannot be permitted to be usurped by the Chairman of the Bar Council of India, as was done in the instant case.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/09\/bci-gag-order-issue-advocates-fundamental-rights-karnataka-hc-legal-news\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/09\/bci-gag-order-issue-advocates-fundamental-rights-karnataka-hc-legal-news\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/09\/bci-gag-order-issue-advocates-fundamental-rights-karnataka-hc-legal-news\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Karnataka-High-Court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Karnataka-High-Court.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"Karnataka High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/09\/bci-gag-order-issue-advocates-fundamental-rights-karnataka-hc-legal-news\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Bar Council of India cannot ostensibly pass any gag order which takes away an Advocate\u2019s fundamental right: Karnataka HC"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa","name":"Sucheta","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Sucheta"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Karnataka-High-Court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":356241,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/11\/bci-state-bar-councils-cannot-collect-optional-fees-supreme-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":332709,"position":0},"title":"\u2018There is nothing like optional\u2019; BCI &amp; State Bar Councils cannot collect any \u2018optional\u2019 fees: Supreme Court","author":"Sucheta","date":"August 11, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"A contempt petition was filed before the Court alleging that State Bar Councils are not complying with directions given in Gaurav Kumar v. Union of India, (2025) 1 SCC 641 with specific allegations for Karnataka State Bar Council.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Bar councils cannot collect Optional Fees","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Bar-councils-cannot-collect-Optional-Fees.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Bar-councils-cannot-collect-Optional-Fees.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Bar-councils-cannot-collect-Optional-Fees.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Bar-councils-cannot-collect-Optional-Fees.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":236516,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/30\/bci-last-details-of-practicing-advocates-to-be-supplied-as-per-requirement-of-scs-e-committee-by-15th-november\/","url_meta":{"origin":332709,"position":1},"title":"BCI | &#8220;Last &#038; Final Opportunity&#8221;; Details of Practicing Advocates to be supplied as per requirement of SC&#8217;s e-Committee by 15th November","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 30, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Bar Council of India The General Council of the Bar Council of India, as a last and final opportunity, has resolved to extend the last date for submission of the details of every practicing Advocate of the country sought as per the requirement of the e-Committee of the Supreme Court\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Hot Off The Press&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Hot Off The Press","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/hot_off_the_press\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/bar-council-of-india.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/bar-council-of-india.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/bar-council-of-india.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/bar-council-of-india.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/bar-council-of-india.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":338885,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/13\/reservation-women-advocates-bengaluru-advocate-association-karnataka-hc-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":332709,"position":2},"title":"Why Karnataka High Court dismissed pleas on Reservation of Women in Bengaluru Advocates Association Elections?","author":"Sucheta","date":"January 13, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court said directions regarding ensuring reservation of women advocates had been issued by the Supreme Court under Art. 142 and same cannot be done by the High Court.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Karnataka High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Karnataka-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Karnataka-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Karnataka-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Karnataka-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":323871,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/07\/extracting-work-without-payment-exploitation-violation-fundamental-rights-madras-hc-directs-guidelines-for-advocates-in-tn-bar-council\/","url_meta":{"origin":332709,"position":3},"title":"\u2018Extracting work from Junior Advocates without payment is exploitation and in violation of fundamental rights\u2019; Madras HC suggests for minimum stipend","author":"Apoorva","date":"June 7, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe function of the Bar Council is to ensure that the livelihood of these lawyers is protected by fixing minimum stipend to be paid in the event of engaging the services of the junior lawyers, who have enrolled.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madras High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Madras-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Madras-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Madras-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Madras-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":222450,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/25\/bci-to-introduce-mandatory-experience-clause-for-every-new-entrant-to-bar-before-joining-hc-or-sc\/","url_meta":{"origin":332709,"position":4},"title":"BCI to introduce mandatory &#8220;experience clause&#8221; for every new entrant to Bar before joining HC or SC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 25, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"In the light of the suggestions made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice of India Shri Bobde, the Bar Council is proposing to amend its Rule and to exercise the powers vested in it under Section-7 and 49 of the Advocates Act, 1961. The Council is likely to introduce a mandatory\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Hot Off The Press&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Hot Off The Press","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/hot_off_the_press\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/bar-council-of-india.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/bar-council-of-india.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/bar-council-of-india.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/bar-council-of-india.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/bar-council-of-india.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":365737,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/04\/supreme-court-rejects-reservation-specially-abled-advocates-bci\/","url_meta":{"origin":332709,"position":5},"title":"Supreme Court refuses plea seeking reservation for specially-abled advocates in Bar Council and Bar Associations; Asks BCI to consider the cause","author":"Apoorva","date":"November 4, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe instant writ petition, purportedly in public interest, has been filed inter alia seeking a direction to the Bar Council of India and Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh to reserve some of the positions in the Bar Council and Bar Associations for persons with disabilities, who are practicing as advocates.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"SC rejects reservation specially-abled advocates","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/SC-rejects-reservation-specially-abled-advocates.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/SC-rejects-reservation-specially-abled-advocates.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/SC-rejects-reservation-specially-abled-advocates.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/SC-rejects-reservation-specially-abled-advocates.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/332709","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=332709"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/332709\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/316069"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=332709"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=332709"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=332709"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}