{"id":332488,"date":"2024-10-05T10:00:36","date_gmt":"2024-10-05T04:30:36","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=332488"},"modified":"2024-10-09T17:19:46","modified_gmt":"2024-10-09T11:49:46","slug":"delhi-hc-refuses-exercise-power-judicial-review-usurp-powers-nclt-petition-filed-against-rbi","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/05\/delhi-hc-refuses-exercise-power-judicial-review-usurp-powers-nclt-petition-filed-against-rbi\/","title":{"rendered":"Delhi High Court refuses to exercise power of judicial review and usurp powers of NCLT in petition filed against Reserve Bank of India"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Delhi High Court:<\/span> In a writ petition filed by Gateway Investment Management Services Ltd (‘Gateway Investment’) to invoke the writ jurisdiction of the Court under Article 226<\/a> of the Constitution<\/a>, seeking, among other reliefs, a writ\/order\/direction against the Reserve Bank of India (‘RBI’) to develop a framework under the Banking Regulation Act, 1949<\/a> (‘Regulation’) for financial institutions to act in a fair, transparent, and reasonable manner while exercising decision making power in approving a resolution plan to ensure public interest and maximization of recovery, a Single Judge Bench of Dharmesh Sharma, J. abstained from exercising the power of judicial review and said that the commercial wisdom of the Committee of Creditors (‘CoC’), whereby the resolution plan of Gateway Investment was rejected, must be inquired into by the National Company Law Tribunal (‘NCLT’).<\/p>\n

Background<\/h3>\n

Apart from the abovementioned relief, Gateway Investment also sought a writ\/order\/direction against respondents 2-6 to initiate the process of fresh voting on Gateway Investment’s resolution plan after considering the email dated 05-09-2024 and to abide by the principle of equality and fairness while considering the resolution plan.<\/p>\n

Gateway Investment claimed that even though it was the highest bidder in the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (‘CIRP’) in respect of Helios Photo Voltaic Private Ltd, the Corporate Debtor (‘CD’) both in terms of monetary value and net present value, its bid was not accepted by the CoC (respondent 2, 4, and 5) in the meeting held on 05-09-2024.<\/p>\n

Gateway Investment mentioned that it had taken part in the e-auction held on 29-07-2024 and had offered revival plan by infusion of Rs. 109,87,50,000\/- payable to the secured creditors over a period of 12 months. It was said that this bid had been declined by the CoC on 18-09-2024 in an arbitrary manner, exhibiting complete lack of ‘commercial wisdom’.<\/p>\n

The National Asset Reconstruction Company Limited (respondent 2) submitted that in the realm of a ‘private contract’ between the parties and the bidding process, the bidder is only entitled to be considered but there is no thumb rule which says that the highest bidder should also be accorded priority for the resolution plan.<\/p>\n

It was vehemently argued that under Sections 31<\/a> and 34<\/a> of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016<\/a> (‘IBC’), the resolution plan accepted by the CoC should be placed for approval before the Adjudicating Authority\/NCLT and the bidder is at liberty to air his grievances by filing objections before the NCLT but cannot approach the Court in writ jurisdiction.<\/p>\n

It was also submitted that when the CoC was convening a meeting, a fresh offer was made to infuse funds within 90 days just when voting was going to take place on the three bids that had been submitted due to systematic leakage from some disgruntled members.<\/p>\n

Analysis and Decision<\/h3>\n

The Court perused the record and stated that at the outset, it was not inclined to issue notice because Gateway Investment had an alternative and efficacious remedy to assail the impugned action or inaction on the part of CoC before NCLT.<\/p>\n

The Court mentioned that only the Adjudicating Authority has the jurisdiction to regulate the conduct of the CoC and finally adjudicate upon the resolution plan through the powers of judicial review and thereby ensure that the CoC functions as per the role and responsibilities delineated under the IBC.<\/p>\n

The Court said that the resolution plan decided by the CoC should be put up for consideration before the Adjudicating Authority which would finally decide whether the CoC had performed its fiduciary duty as per the legislative mandate of IBC.<\/p>\n

After perusing the guidelines framed by the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India for functioning of the CoC coupled with the relevant provisions of the IBC, the Court was not urged to exercise its power of judicial review and usurp the powers of NCLT to inquire into the commercial wisdom of CoC whereby the Resolution Plan of Gateway Investment was rejected vide impugned letter dated 18-09-2024.<\/p>\n

The Court noted the desperate attempt made by Gateway Investment whereby it was willing to match the offer given by successful applicant, but the same could not be entertained by the Court. The Court stated that the bottom line was that the decision of the CoC should definitely be considered by NCLT in a just and expedient manner and if found fit, it may even allow ‘Open Court Bidding’ as per law.<\/p>\n

The Court, while dismissing the petition, gave Gateway Investment the liberty to take appropriate recourse before NCLT which would alone decide the objections of Gateway Investment.<\/p>\n

[Gateway Investment Management Services v. Reserve Bank of India, 2024 SCC OnLine Del 6675<\/a>, Decided on 23-09-2024<\/span>]<\/p>\n\n

Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n

For Petitioner —<\/span> Senior Advocate Rajiv Nayar, Advocate Vaibhav Mishra, Advocate Ekansh Mishra, Advocate Ashu Kansal, Advocate Akash Shrivastav, Advocate Devika Mohan, Advocate Udita Singh<\/p>\n

For Respondent —<\/span> Advocate Ayush Srivastava, Senior Advocate Jayant Mehta, Advocate Dhruv Malik, Advocate Aditi Sinha, Advocate Rajnandini Singh, Advocate Prashant Mehta, Advocate Raghav Marwaha<\/p>\n

Buy Constitution of India  HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n

\"Constitution<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

‘The Adjudicating Authority alone has the jurisdiction to regulate the conduct of CoC and finally adjudicate upon the resolution plan through powers of judicial review while ensuring that CoC functions as per the role and responsibilities delineated under IBC.’<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":314886,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[12141,2543,73763,3528,69154,12521,2732,13551],"class_list":["post-332488","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-article-226","tag-Delhi_High_Court","tag-gateway-investment-management-services","tag-Judicial_Review","tag-justice-dharmesh-sharma","tag-nclt","tag-Reserve_Bank_of_India","tag-writ-petition"],"yoast_head":"\nDelhi HC refuses to exercise power of judicial review and usurp powers of NCLT in petition filed against the RBI | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Delhi High Court refuses to exercise power of judicial review and usurp powers of NCLT in petition filed against the Reserve Bank of India\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/05\/delhi-hc-refuses-exercise-power-judicial-review-usurp-powers-nclt-petition-filed-against-rbi\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Delhi High Court refuses to exercise power of judicial review and usurp powers of NCLT in petition filed against Reserve Bank of India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Delhi High Court refuses to exercise power of judicial review and usurp powers of NCLT in petition filed against the Reserve Bank of India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/05\/delhi-hc-refuses-exercise-power-judicial-review-usurp-powers-nclt-petition-filed-against-rbi\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-10-05T04:30:36+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-10-09T11:49:46+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"591\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Delhi High Court refuses to exercise power of judicial review and usurp powers of NCLT in petition filed against Reserve Bank of India\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/05\/delhi-hc-refuses-exercise-power-judicial-review-usurp-powers-nclt-petition-filed-against-rbi\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/05\/delhi-hc-refuses-exercise-power-judicial-review-usurp-powers-nclt-petition-filed-against-rbi\/\",\"name\":\"Delhi HC refuses to exercise power of judicial review and usurp powers of NCLT in petition filed against the RBI | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/05\/delhi-hc-refuses-exercise-power-judicial-review-usurp-powers-nclt-petition-filed-against-rbi\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/05\/delhi-hc-refuses-exercise-power-judicial-review-usurp-powers-nclt-petition-filed-against-rbi\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-10-05T04:30:36+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-10-09T11:49:46+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"Delhi High Court refuses to exercise power of judicial review and usurp powers of NCLT in petition filed against the Reserve Bank of India\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/05\/delhi-hc-refuses-exercise-power-judicial-review-usurp-powers-nclt-petition-filed-against-rbi\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/05\/delhi-hc-refuses-exercise-power-judicial-review-usurp-powers-nclt-petition-filed-against-rbi\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/05\/delhi-hc-refuses-exercise-power-judicial-review-usurp-powers-nclt-petition-filed-against-rbi\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp\",\"width\":887,\"height\":591,\"caption\":\"Delhi High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/05\/delhi-hc-refuses-exercise-power-judicial-review-usurp-powers-nclt-petition-filed-against-rbi\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Delhi High Court refuses to exercise power of judicial review and usurp powers of NCLT in petition filed against Reserve Bank of India\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Delhi HC refuses to exercise power of judicial review and usurp powers of NCLT in petition filed against the RBI | SCC Times","description":"Delhi High Court refuses to exercise power of judicial review and usurp powers of NCLT in petition filed against the Reserve Bank of India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/05\/delhi-hc-refuses-exercise-power-judicial-review-usurp-powers-nclt-petition-filed-against-rbi\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Delhi High Court refuses to exercise power of judicial review and usurp powers of NCLT in petition filed against Reserve Bank of India","og_description":"Delhi High Court refuses to exercise power of judicial review and usurp powers of NCLT in petition filed against the Reserve Bank of India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/05\/delhi-hc-refuses-exercise-power-judicial-review-usurp-powers-nclt-petition-filed-against-rbi\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2024-10-05T04:30:36+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-10-09T11:49:46+00:00","og_image":[{"width":887,"height":591,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Delhi High Court refuses to exercise power of judicial review and usurp powers of NCLT in petition filed against Reserve Bank of India","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/05\/delhi-hc-refuses-exercise-power-judicial-review-usurp-powers-nclt-petition-filed-against-rbi\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/05\/delhi-hc-refuses-exercise-power-judicial-review-usurp-powers-nclt-petition-filed-against-rbi\/","name":"Delhi HC refuses to exercise power of judicial review and usurp powers of NCLT in petition filed against the RBI | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/05\/delhi-hc-refuses-exercise-power-judicial-review-usurp-powers-nclt-petition-filed-against-rbi\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/05\/delhi-hc-refuses-exercise-power-judicial-review-usurp-powers-nclt-petition-filed-against-rbi\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp","datePublished":"2024-10-05T04:30:36+00:00","dateModified":"2024-10-09T11:49:46+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"Delhi High Court refuses to exercise power of judicial review and usurp powers of NCLT in petition filed against the Reserve Bank of India","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/05\/delhi-hc-refuses-exercise-power-judicial-review-usurp-powers-nclt-petition-filed-against-rbi\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/05\/delhi-hc-refuses-exercise-power-judicial-review-usurp-powers-nclt-petition-filed-against-rbi\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/05\/delhi-hc-refuses-exercise-power-judicial-review-usurp-powers-nclt-petition-filed-against-rbi\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp","width":887,"height":591,"caption":"Delhi High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/05\/delhi-hc-refuses-exercise-power-judicial-review-usurp-powers-nclt-petition-filed-against-rbi\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Delhi High Court refuses to exercise power of judicial review and usurp powers of NCLT in petition filed against Reserve Bank of India"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":279136,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/05\/writ-petition-under-article-226-of-the-constitution-cannot-be-filed-for-seeking-alteration-in-contract-delhi-high-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":332488,"position":0},"title":"Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution cannot be filed for seeking alteration in contract: Delhi High Court","author":"Editor","date":"December 5, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"The Delhi High Court held that a borrower cannot ask for alteration of contract by way of a writ petition and a contract can only be altered through mutual consent between the parties.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/Delhi-High-Court-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":299579,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/18\/delhi-high-court-air-india-not-state-under-article-12-employees-public-employment\/","url_meta":{"origin":332488,"position":1},"title":"Delhi High Court| Air India not \u2018State\u2019 under Article 12 after privatization; Employees of Air India Limited no longer fall within the domain of \u2018public employment\u2019","author":"Arunima","date":"August 18, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, a writ cannot be issued against a Government- entity which has been subsequently privatized and no longer performs any public duty.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":220862,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/15\/raj-hc%e2%94%82petition-under-art-226-cannot-be-entertained-where-an-alternate-statutory-remedy-is-available\/","url_meta":{"origin":332488,"position":2},"title":"Raj HC | Petition under Art. 226 cannot be entertained where an alternate statutory remedy is available","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 15, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Rajasthan High Court: Ashok Kumar Gaur, J. dismissed the writ petition filed against the order passed by the Registrar, Cooperative Societies-cum Registrar Institution exercising the powers inferred upon him under Section 24 of the Rajasthan Sports (Registration, Recognition and Regulation of Association) Act, 2005. The respondent had issued a notice\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":299500,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/17\/delhi-hc-air-india-limited-is-no-longer-amenable-under-article-226-of-the-constitution\/","url_meta":{"origin":332488,"position":3},"title":"Air India Limited being a private entity is no longer amenable to writ jurisdiction: Delhi High Court","author":"Editor","date":"August 17, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe writ petition, while initially deemed maintainable, has since become non-maintainable due to the privatization of Air India Limited. This development has rendered it beyond this Court's jurisdiction to issue any writ, order, or direction against the respondents.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":297520,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/24\/writ-petition-filed-after-suit-seeking-same-relief-withdrawn-not-maintainable-sc-reiterates-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":332488,"position":4},"title":"Writ Petition filed after Suit seeking same relief was withdrawn without liberty to file afresh not Maintainable: SC reiterates","author":"Editor","date":"July 24, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Supreme Court called the matter at hand a classic case in which a litigant had been able to mislead the Courts and authorities at different levels to put life into his stale claim.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"maintainability of writ petition","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/maintainability-of-writ-petition.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/maintainability-of-writ-petition.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/maintainability-of-writ-petition.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/maintainability-of-writ-petition.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":318586,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/28\/orders-passed-by-tribunals-under-senior-citizens-act-2007-also-amenable-to-challenge-under-article-227-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":332488,"position":5},"title":"Orders passed by tribunals under Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 also amenable to challenge under Article 227: Delhi High Court","author":"Simranjeet","date":"March 28, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The orders passed by the tribunals and the judicial acts by administrative bodies or authorities or persons exercising quasi-judicial functions are all amenable to challenge under Article 226 of the Constitution.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/332488","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=332488"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/332488\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/314886"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=332488"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=332488"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=332488"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}