{"id":332073,"date":"2024-09-28T15:00:49","date_gmt":"2024-09-28T09:30:49","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=332073"},"modified":"2024-10-01T17:29:58","modified_gmt":"2024-10-01T11:59:58","slug":"7-accused-persons-acquittal-1985-murder-abduction-prosecution-sc-legal-news","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/28\/7-accused-persons-acquittal-1985-murder-abduction-prosecution-sc-legal-news\/","title":{"rendered":"SC acquits all 7 persons convicted in 1985 murder & abduction case as reasonable doubts strike prosecution case\u2019s foundations"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Supreme Court:<\/span> While considering the instant appeal challenging 2015 decision by Patna High Court to uphold conviction and sentencing of 5 accused persons and reversing acquittal of 2 accused persons in connection to a murder case in 1985; the Division Bench of Bela M. Trivedi and Satish Chandra Sharma*<\/span>, JJ., on detailed analysis of the case, found that the prosecution failed to discharge its burden to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. The reasonable doubts were irreconcilable and struck at the foundation of the prosecution’s case. Therefore, the Court set aside the conviction and sentence of the 7 accused persons and acquitted them of all charges.<\/p>\n

The Court emphasised that in order to reverse a finding of acquittal, a higher threshold is required<\/span>. The presumption of innocence operating in favour of an accused throughout the trial gets concretized with a finding of acquittal by the Trial Court. Thus, such a finding could not be reversed merely because the possibility of an alternate view was alive.<\/p>\n

Background:<\/h3>\n

In 1985, the deceased girl’s brother alleged that she was abducted by 7 persons in order to forcefully obtain the possession of the house belonging to her father and was later killed. Investigation was commenced which led to the filing of a chargesheet against the seven convicts. The Trial Court charged all seven accused persons for the commission of offences punishable under Sections 323<\/a>, 302<\/a>, 364<\/a>, 449<\/a>, 450<\/a>, 380<\/a>\/34<\/a>, 342<\/a>, 506<\/a> and 120-B<\/a> of Penal Code, 1860<\/a>. The Trial Court, vide order dated 05-06-1992, convicted the accused persons listed as Accused Persons 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 for the commission of offences under Section 302<\/a>\/34<\/a> and 364<\/a>\/34<\/a> of IPC<\/a>. They were acquitted of all other charges and Accused 6 and 7 (A-6 and A-7) were acquitted of all the charges.<\/p>\n

The accused persons preferred an appeal before the Patna High Court against the order of conviction. The High Court vide a common judgment dated 26-03-2015, upheld the conviction of the five convicts and set aside the acquittal of accused nos. 6 and 7 by finding them guilty of the commission of offences under Sections 364<\/a>\/34<\/a> and 302<\/a>\/34<\/a> of IPC<\/a>. Accordingly, accused nos. 6 and 7 were also convicted and were sentenced to undergo rigorous life imprisonment on each count.<\/p>\n

Court’s Assessment:<\/h3>\n

Perusing the case, the Court delved in detail into the proceedings before the Trial Court and Patna High Court. It was noted that the Trial Court relied primarily on oral testimonies of the prosecution witnesses and circumstantial evidence while convicting 5 persons. Furthermore, motive for the commission of the offence was supplied by the pending legal dispute relating to the property.<\/p>\n

Upon reading the impugned order, the Court found that Patna High Court carried out a fresh appreciation of evidence before affirming conviction and sentencing of 5 persons and re-convicting the remaining 2.<\/p>\n

Principal issue before the Court was whether the finding of guilt of the convicts arrived at by the High Court was sustainable given the evidence on record. As a corollary of this issue, it also needed to be examined whether the approach of the High Court was in line with the settled law for reversing an acquittal into conviction in a criminal appeal.<\/p>\n

It was pointed out that after two rounds of litigation before the Trial Court and the High Court, the case was to be examined only with respect to the offences under Sections 364<\/a> and 302<\/a> of IPC<\/a> read with Section 34<\/a> IPC<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Vis-a-vis Section 364<\/a>, IPC<\/a> the case of the prosecution was based on direct oral evidence, and with respect to the offence under Section 302<\/a>, IPC<\/a>, the case of the prosecution was essentially based on circumstantial evidence as no direct evidence of the commission of murder could be collected. “There is a sequential relationship between the two offences and thus, in order to set up a case for the commission of the offence of murder, it is necessary to prove the commission of the offence of abduction by the accused persons\/appellants. For, the chain, in a case based on circumstantial evidence, must be complete and consistent<\/span>”.<\/p>\n

Examining the testimonies of the independent and chance witnesses presented by the prosecution, the Court noted that there were several lacunas. Furthermore, the Court found that the testimonies of the eyewitnesses were also impeachable. Furthermore, the Court raised concerns regarding the fairness of investigation after noticing that there were stark differences between the statements given by investigating officer and senior officers who had exercised supervision over the IO.<\/p>\n

The Court further pointed out that none of the eyewitnesses was an independent witness of fact. Ordinarily, there is no rule of law to discard the testimonies of the witnesses merely because they were known to the victim or belonged to her family. For, an offence may be committed in circumstances that only the family members are present at the place of occurrence in natural course. However, the instant case does not fall in such category. In the facts of the instant case, the natural presence of the eyewitnesses at the place of occurrence is under serious doubt, and for unexplained reasons, the naturally present public persons were not examined as witnesses in the matter.<\/p>\n

The Court also pointed out that the conduct of the eyewitnesses also appeared to be unnatural considering that they were all relatives of the deceased. “They saw the accused persons leaving with X after abducting her. It is also admitted that they had identified the accused persons, who were essentially the relatives of the eyewitnesses. In such circumstances, as per natural human conduct, the least that they could have done was to follow the accused persons in their jeep. They admittedly had a ready vehicle with them. Despite so, there was no such attempt on their part, so<\/span> much so that the dead body of X was not even discovered until the following morning as none of the eyewitnesses had any clue as to where the accused persons had taken away the deceased after abducting her<\/span>”.<\/p>\n

The Court also noted that the approach of the High Court in reversing the acquittal of A-6 and A-7 was not in line with the settled law pertaining to reversal of acquittals. Trial Court had acquitted the said two accused persons on the basis of a thorough appreciation of evidence and the High Court merely observed that their acquittal was based on the improbable statement of PW-5 and since the evidence of PW-5 stood excluded from the record, there was no reason left for the acquittal of A-6 and A-7.<\/p>\n

The Division Bench further pointed out that the High Court did not arrive at any finding of illegality or perversity in the opinion of the Trial Court on that count. Furthermore, it did not arrive at any positive finding of involvement of the two Accused Persons within the sphere of common intention with the remaining accused persons. Equally, the exclusion of the evidence of PW5, without explaining as to how the evidence of other prosecution witnesses was not liable to be excluded in the same manner, was incorrect and erroneous.<\/p>\n

The Court emphasised that in order to reverse a finding of acquittal, a higher threshold is required. The view taken by the Trial Court must be held to be completely unsustainable and not a probable view. “The High Court, in the impugned judgment, took a cursory view of the matter and reversed the acquittal of A-6 and A-7 without arriving at any finding of illegality or perversity or impossibility of the Trial Court’s view or non-appreciation of evidence by the Trial Court<\/span>”.<\/p>\n

The Court therefore observed that case of the prosecution was full of glaring doubts as regards the offence of abduction. The Court further pointed out that although, the postmortem report indicated that the death of the deceased was unnatural and the commission of murder cannot be ruled out; but there was no direct evidence on record to prove the commission of murder by the convicts. The link of causation between the convicts and the alleged offence was conspicuously missing. The foundation of circumstantial evidence having fallen down, no inference could be drawn from it to infer the commission of the offence under Section 302<\/a> IPC<\/a> by the convicts.<\/p>\n

Vis-a-vis motive, the Court stated that motive has a bearing only when the evidence on record is sufficient to prove the ingredients of the offences under consideration. Without proof of foundational facts, the prosecution’s case cannot succeed with motive alone.<\/p>\n

Hence, the Court concluded that findings of conviction arrived at by the Trial Court and the High Court are not sustainable. Moreover, the High Court erred in reversing the acquittal of A-6 and A-7. Accordingly, the impugned judgment and the judgment rendered by the Trial Court (to the extent of conviction of A-1 to A-5) was set aside.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\n

CASE DETAILS<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n<\/colgroup>\n\n\n
\n

Citation:<\/span>
2024 SCC OnLine SC 2623<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n

Appellants :<\/span>
Vijay Singh<\/p>\n

Respondents :<\/span>
State of Bihar<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

Advocates who appeared in this case<\/p>\n

Appellant:<\/span>
Ajay Kumar Singh<\/p>\n

Respondents:<\/span>
Abhinav Mukherji; Manish Kumar<\/p>\n

Intervenor:<\/span>
Shantanu Sagar<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

CORAM :<\/span><\/p>\n

\n
\n

\"Bela
Bela M. Trivedi, J.<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

\"Satish
Satish Chandra Sharma, J.<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

Buy Penal Code, 1860   HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n

\"penal<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The Court emphasised that in order to reverse a finding of acquittal, a higher threshold is required. The presumption of innocence operating in favour of an accused throughout the trial gets concretized with a finding of acquittal by the Trial Court.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":332087,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,9],"tags":[73580,3020,4561,3433,3468,44666,3696,24914,3156],"class_list":["post-332073","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-supremecourt","tag-1985-murder-and-abduction-case","tag-abduction","tag-acquittal","tag-circumstantial_evidence","tag-conviction","tag-justice-satish-chandra-sharma","tag-kidnapping","tag-motive","tag-murder"],"yoast_head":"\nSC acquits all 7 persons convicted in 1985 murder & abduction case | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"SC acquited all 7 persons convicted in 1985 murder & abduction case as reasonable doubts strike the prosecution case\u2019s foundations\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/28\/7-accused-persons-acquittal-1985-murder-abduction-prosecution-sc-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"SC acquits all 7 persons convicted in 1985 murder & abduction case as reasonable doubts strike prosecution case\u2019s foundations\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"SC acquited all 7 persons convicted in 1985 murder & abduction case as reasonable doubts strike the prosecution case\u2019s foundations.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/28\/7-accused-persons-acquittal-1985-murder-abduction-prosecution-sc-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-09-28T09:30:49+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-10-01T11:59:58+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/all-7-persons-convicted-in-1985-murder.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"SC acquits all 7 persons convicted in 1985 murder & abduction case as reasonable doubts strike prosecution case\u2019s foundations\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/28\/7-accused-persons-acquittal-1985-murder-abduction-prosecution-sc-legal-news\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/28\/7-accused-persons-acquittal-1985-murder-abduction-prosecution-sc-legal-news\/\",\"name\":\"SC acquits all 7 persons convicted in 1985 murder & abduction case | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/28\/7-accused-persons-acquittal-1985-murder-abduction-prosecution-sc-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/28\/7-accused-persons-acquittal-1985-murder-abduction-prosecution-sc-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/all-7-persons-convicted-in-1985-murder.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-09-28T09:30:49+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-10-01T11:59:58+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\"},\"description\":\"SC acquited all 7 persons convicted in 1985 murder & abduction case as reasonable doubts strike the prosecution case\u2019s foundations\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/28\/7-accused-persons-acquittal-1985-murder-abduction-prosecution-sc-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/28\/7-accused-persons-acquittal-1985-murder-abduction-prosecution-sc-legal-news\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/28\/7-accused-persons-acquittal-1985-murder-abduction-prosecution-sc-legal-news\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/all-7-persons-convicted-in-1985-murder.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/all-7-persons-convicted-in-1985-murder.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"all 7 persons convicted in 1985 murder\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/28\/7-accused-persons-acquittal-1985-murder-abduction-prosecution-sc-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"SC acquits all 7 persons convicted in 1985 murder & abduction case as reasonable doubts strike prosecution case\u2019s foundations\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\",\"name\":\"Sucheta\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Sucheta\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"SC acquits all 7 persons convicted in 1985 murder & abduction case | SCC Times","description":"SC acquited all 7 persons convicted in 1985 murder & abduction case as reasonable doubts strike the prosecution case\u2019s foundations","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/28\/7-accused-persons-acquittal-1985-murder-abduction-prosecution-sc-legal-news\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"SC acquits all 7 persons convicted in 1985 murder & abduction case as reasonable doubts strike prosecution case\u2019s foundations","og_description":"SC acquited all 7 persons convicted in 1985 murder & abduction case as reasonable doubts strike the prosecution case\u2019s foundations.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/28\/7-accused-persons-acquittal-1985-murder-abduction-prosecution-sc-legal-news\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2024-09-28T09:30:49+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-10-01T11:59:58+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/all-7-persons-convicted-in-1985-murder.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Sucheta","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"SC acquits all 7 persons convicted in 1985 murder & abduction case as reasonable doubts strike prosecution case\u2019s foundations","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Sucheta","Est. reading time":"8 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/28\/7-accused-persons-acquittal-1985-murder-abduction-prosecution-sc-legal-news\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/28\/7-accused-persons-acquittal-1985-murder-abduction-prosecution-sc-legal-news\/","name":"SC acquits all 7 persons convicted in 1985 murder & abduction case | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/28\/7-accused-persons-acquittal-1985-murder-abduction-prosecution-sc-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/28\/7-accused-persons-acquittal-1985-murder-abduction-prosecution-sc-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/all-7-persons-convicted-in-1985-murder.webp","datePublished":"2024-09-28T09:30:49+00:00","dateModified":"2024-10-01T11:59:58+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa"},"description":"SC acquited all 7 persons convicted in 1985 murder & abduction case as reasonable doubts strike the prosecution case\u2019s foundations","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/28\/7-accused-persons-acquittal-1985-murder-abduction-prosecution-sc-legal-news\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/28\/7-accused-persons-acquittal-1985-murder-abduction-prosecution-sc-legal-news\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/28\/7-accused-persons-acquittal-1985-murder-abduction-prosecution-sc-legal-news\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/all-7-persons-convicted-in-1985-murder.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/all-7-persons-convicted-in-1985-murder.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"all 7 persons convicted in 1985 murder"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/28\/7-accused-persons-acquittal-1985-murder-abduction-prosecution-sc-legal-news\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"SC acquits all 7 persons convicted in 1985 murder & abduction case as reasonable doubts strike prosecution case\u2019s foundations"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa","name":"Sucheta","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Sucheta"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/all-7-persons-convicted-in-1985-murder.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":277186,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/10\/supreme-court-acquits-all-3-accused-in-chhawla-gang-rape-murder-prosecution-criminal-trial-legal-research-updates-law-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":332073,"position":0},"title":"“Left with no alternative”, Supreme Court acquits all 3 accused in Chhawla Gang Rape and Murder case","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"November 10, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe prosecution has to bring home the charges levelled against them beyond reasonable doubt, which the prosecution has failed to do in the instant case, resultantly, the Court is left with no alternative but to acquit the accused, though involved in a very heinous crime.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image-10-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image-10-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image-10-1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image-10-1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image-10-1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":196710,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/06\/finding-of-acquittal-is-not-to-be-disturbed-if-there-are-two-views-possible-arising-out-of-the-same-facts\/","url_meta":{"origin":332073,"position":1},"title":"Finding of acquittal is not to be disturbed if there are two views possible arising out of the same facts","author":"Saba","date":"June 6, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: The Bench comprising of M.M. Shantanagoudar, J., delivering a judgment for himself and L. Nageswara Rao, J., disposed of a criminal appeal by modifying the conviction of the appellant by setting aside his conviction under Section 302 IPC while upholding the conviction under Section 326. The Appellant (Accused\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":216344,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/02\/pak-sc-identification-of-many-accused-persons-in-one-line-in-one-go-during-a-test-identification-parade-held-to-be-improper\/","url_meta":{"origin":332073,"position":2},"title":"Pak SC | Identification of many accused persons in one line in one go during a test identification parade held to be improper","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 2, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court of Pakistan: A Division Bench of Asif Saeed Khan Khosa, C.J. and Syed Mansoor Ali Shah, J. in the current order consolidated all the relevant precedents and the best practices pertaining to the Test Identification Parade so as to remove confusions regarding their legal position in future. The\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/supreme_court_of_jpakistan.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/supreme_court_of_jpakistan.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/supreme_court_of_jpakistan.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/supreme_court_of_jpakistan.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/supreme_court_of_jpakistan.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":230449,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/06\/04\/presumption-of-murder-can-be-drawn-when-abduction-and-destroying-of-the-body-by-the-accused-is-already-proved\/","url_meta":{"origin":332073,"position":3},"title":"Presumption of murder can be drawn when abduction and destroying of the body by the accused is already proved","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"June 4, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: In a reference from a 2-judge bench verdict where Justice V. Gopala Gowda acquitted and Justice Arun Mishra convicted the accused in the abduction and murder of former Tamil Nadu MLA MK Balan, the 3-judge bench of RF Nariman, KM Joseph and V. Ramasubramanian, JJ agreed with Justice\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":85071,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/11\/11\/man-accused-of-murder-acquitted-due-to-investigation-carried-out-in-lackluster-manner\/","url_meta":{"origin":332073,"position":4},"title":"Man accused of murder acquitted due to investigation carried out in lackluster manner","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"November 11, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: In the matter where the accused, along with a group of co-accused persons, each armed with deadly weapons fired a gunshot in the abdomen of the deceased after a quarrel thereby resulting into his death, the Court set aside the conviction of the accused on the ground that\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":273290,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/08\/supreme-court-karnataka-high-court-section-302-of-the-penal-code-section-378-crpc-conviction-acquittal-unlawful-assembly-murder-common-object-first-information-reports-rioting-trespass-wi\/","url_meta":{"origin":332073,"position":5},"title":"Reversing acquittal of only 2 out of 22 acquitted murder accused, despite glaring contradictions between witness testimonies, illogical; SC sets aside Karnataka HC verdict","author":"Editor","date":"September 8, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Supreme Court: In an appeal against the Karnataka High Court's reversal of acquittal of 2 out of the 22 accused acquitted by the Sessions Court in a murder case, the bench of V. Ramasubramanian*and Indira Banerjee, JJ has reversed the High Court's verdict observing that there were glaring\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-69-2.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-69-2.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-69-2.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-69-2.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-69-2.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/332073","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=332073"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/332073\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/332087"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=332073"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=332073"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=332073"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}