{"id":331700,"date":"2024-09-25T09:00:36","date_gmt":"2024-09-25T03:30:36","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=331700"},"modified":"2024-09-25T08:51:30","modified_gmt":"2024-09-25T03:21:30","slug":"2024-scc-vol-8-part-1","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/25\/2024-scc-vol-8-part-1\/","title":{"rendered":"2024 SCC Vol. 8 Part 1"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n

Civil Procedure Code, 1908<\/a> — S. 11<\/a> — Res judicata — Applicability between co-defendants — Conditions for:<\/span> When in earlier suit rights of co-defendants in respect of suit land were neither in issue, nor ever adjudicated, held, principle of res judicata will not be applicable, [Har Narayan Tewari<\/i> v. Ramgarh Cantonment Board<\/i>, (2024) 8 SCC 114<\/a>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Constitution of India<\/a> — Arts. 21<\/a> and 47<\/a> — Right to safe drugs — Misleading advertisements:<\/span> Slew of measures directed by Supreme Court to protect consumers from misleading advertisements. Directions included equal responsibility of advertisers and endorsers qua misleading ads and uploading of a self-declaration form by advertisers before issuing any advertisements, [Indian Medical Assn.<\/i> v. Union of India<\/i>, (2024) 8 SCC 46<\/a>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Constitution of India<\/a> — Arts. 21<\/a> and 47<\/a> — Right to safe drugs — Misleading advertisements:<\/span> Directions proposed to be passed by Supreme Court. Various necessary parties directed to be impleaded, [Indian Medical Assn.<\/i> v. Union of India<\/i>, (2024) 8 SCC 57<\/a>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973<\/a> — S. 378<\/a> — Appeal against acquittal — Scope of interference by the High Court:<\/span> Principles needs to be kept in mind, reiterated, [Babu Sahebagouda Rudragoudar<\/i> v. State of Karnataka<\/i>, (2024) 8 SCC 149<\/a>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016<\/a> — S. 31<\/a>:<\/span> Obligations\/Terms accepted by successful resolution applicant (SRA) must be complied with in the terms in which they were accepted. The manner\/mode of compliance cannot be permitted to be modified subsequently, [SBI<\/i> v. Murari Lal Jalan & Florian Fritsch Consortium<\/i>, (2024) 8 SCC 1<\/a>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Insurance — General Insurance — Fire\/Special Perils Insurance — Reinstatement value clause in policy — Loss computation on depreciation basis:<\/span> Loss computation on depreciation basis is permissible when reinstatement value option in insurance policy has not been exercised, [New India Assurance Co. Ltd.<\/i> v. Tata Steel Ltd.<\/i>, (2024) 8 SCC 15<\/a>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Penal Code, 1860<\/a> — S. 302<\/a> r\/w S. 34<\/a> — Ocular evidence:<\/span> Plea as to contradictions regarding location of occurrence and omission on part of IO in marking a spot on site plan, when not material, explained, [Dharmendra Kumar<\/i> v. State of M.P.<\/i>, (2024) 8 SCC 60<\/a>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Penal Code, 1860<\/a> — Ss. 300<\/a> Firstly, Thirdly and 302<\/a> — Intention and nature of fatal injury:<\/span> Intention to cause death can easily be discerned from conduct of appellant and nature of fatal injury inflicted, which in ordinary course of nature was sufficient to cause death. Fulfilment of any one condition of S. 300 is enough to convict appellant under S. 302, but in present case not one but two conditions have clearly been shown to exist to nail appellant for murder, [Joy Devaraj<\/i> v. State of Kerala<\/i>, (2024) 8 SCC 102<\/a>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Service Law — Recruitment Process — Eligibility criteria\/conditions — Relaxation of norms\/conditions — Age relaxation — Recruitment to post of “Prabodhak” (teacher):<\/span> Age relaxation for recruitment to post of “Prabodhak” (teacher), in terms of R. 13(v) of Rajasthan Panchayati Raj Prabodhak Service Rules, 2008, valid, [Mahesh Chand Bareth<\/i> v. State of Rajasthan<\/i>, (2024) 8 SCC 124<\/a>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Service Law — Recruitment Process — Eligibility criteria\/conditions:<\/span> Prayer for award of bonus marks rejected as there can be no parity between people working in private sector and those working in the Government, [Manoj Kumar Acharya<\/i> v. State of Rajasthan<\/i>, (2024) 8 SCC 141<\/a>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Service Law — Recruitment Process — Eligibility criteria\/conditions — Recruitment to Panchayati Raj institutions in State of Rajasthan:<\/span> Policy framed by Government in terms of proviso to R. 273 of the 1996 Rules giving weightage to experience, must be allowed to operate on its own terms since quantum\/measure of weightage can be decided by State by adopting rational policy in accordance with law, [State of Rajasthan<\/i> v. Archana<\/i>, (2024) 8 SCC 145<\/a>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Specific Relief Act, 1963<\/a> — S. 19(b)<\/a> — Specific performance of agreement to sell:<\/span> Plea of bona fide purchase by subsequent purchasers i.e. after execution of agreement to sell is not permissible, when agreement to sell registered as required by law. Principles clarified on deemed constructive notice under S. 3 Expln. I TPA when registration of agreement to sell is made compulsory by law, [Maharaj Singh<\/i> v. Karan Singh<\/i>, (2024) 8 SCC 83<\/a>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Civil Procedure Code, 1908 \u2014 S. 11 \u2014 Res judicata \u2014 Applicability between co-defendants \u2014 Conditions<\/i><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":331713,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[5,16],"tags":[29454,39496,7601,56370,73450,50081,73449],"class_list":["post-331700","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casesreported","category-supremecourtcases","tag-appeal-against-acquittal","tag-civil-procedure-code-1908","tag-constitution-of-india","tag-general-insurance","tag-intention-and-nature-of-fatal-injury","tag-misleading-advertisements","tag-right-to-safe-drugs"],"yoast_head":"\n2024 SCC Vol. 8 Part 1 | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Civil Procedure Code, 1908 \u2014 S. 11 \u2014 Res judicata \u2014 Applicability between co-defendants \u2014 Conditions\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/25\/2024-scc-vol-8-part-1\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"2024 SCC Vol. 8 Part 1\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Civil Procedure Code, 1908 \u2014 S. 11 \u2014 Res judicata \u2014 Applicability between co-defendants \u2014 Conditions for: When in earlier suit rights\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/25\/2024-scc-vol-8-part-1\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-09-25T03:30:36+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/2024-SCC-Vol.-8-Part-1.jpeg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"2024 SCC Vol. 8 Part 1\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/09\\\/25\\\/2024-scc-vol-8-part-1\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/09\\\/25\\\/2024-scc-vol-8-part-1\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"headline\":\"2024 SCC Vol. 8 Part 1\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-09-25T03:30:36+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/09\\\/25\\\/2024-scc-vol-8-part-1\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":606,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/09\\\/25\\\/2024-scc-vol-8-part-1\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/09\\\/2024-SCC-Vol.-8-Part-1.webp\",\"keywords\":[\"appeal against acquittal\",\"Civil Procedure Code 1908\",\"Constitution of India\",\"general insurance\",\"Intention and nature of fatal injury\",\"Misleading Advertisements\",\"Right to safe drugs\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Cases Reported\",\"SCC Weekly\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/09\\\/25\\\/2024-scc-vol-8-part-1\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/09\\\/25\\\/2024-scc-vol-8-part-1\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/09\\\/25\\\/2024-scc-vol-8-part-1\\\/\",\"name\":\"2024 SCC Vol. 8 Part 1 | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/09\\\/25\\\/2024-scc-vol-8-part-1\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/09\\\/25\\\/2024-scc-vol-8-part-1\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/09\\\/2024-SCC-Vol.-8-Part-1.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-09-25T03:30:36+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"description\":\"Civil Procedure Code, 1908 \u2014 S. 11 \u2014 Res judicata \u2014 Applicability between co-defendants \u2014 Conditions\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/09\\\/25\\\/2024-scc-vol-8-part-1\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/09\\\/25\\\/2024-scc-vol-8-part-1\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/09\\\/25\\\/2024-scc-vol-8-part-1\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/09\\\/2024-SCC-Vol.-8-Part-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/09\\\/2024-SCC-Vol.-8-Part-1.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"2024 SCC Vol. 8 Part 1\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/09\\\/25\\\/2024-scc-vol-8-part-1\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"2024 SCC Vol. 8 Part 1\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2021\\\/04\\\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2021\\\/04\\\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2021\\\/04\\\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/author\\\/editor_1\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"2024 SCC Vol. 8 Part 1 | SCC Times","description":"Civil Procedure Code, 1908 \u2014 S. 11 \u2014 Res judicata \u2014 Applicability between co-defendants \u2014 Conditions","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/25\/2024-scc-vol-8-part-1\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"2024 SCC Vol. 8 Part 1","og_description":"Civil Procedure Code, 1908 \u2014 S. 11 \u2014 Res judicata \u2014 Applicability between co-defendants \u2014 Conditions for: When in earlier suit rights","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/25\/2024-scc-vol-8-part-1\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2024-09-25T03:30:36+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/2024-SCC-Vol.-8-Part-1.jpeg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"2024 SCC Vol. 8 Part 1","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/25\/2024-scc-vol-8-part-1\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/25\/2024-scc-vol-8-part-1\/"},"author":{"name":"Bhumika Indulia","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"headline":"2024 SCC Vol. 8 Part 1","datePublished":"2024-09-25T03:30:36+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/25\/2024-scc-vol-8-part-1\/"},"wordCount":606,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/25\/2024-scc-vol-8-part-1\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/2024-SCC-Vol.-8-Part-1.webp","keywords":["appeal against acquittal","Civil Procedure Code 1908","Constitution of India","general insurance","Intention and nature of fatal injury","Misleading Advertisements","Right to safe drugs"],"articleSection":["Cases Reported","SCC Weekly"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/25\/2024-scc-vol-8-part-1\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/25\/2024-scc-vol-8-part-1\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/25\/2024-scc-vol-8-part-1\/","name":"2024 SCC Vol. 8 Part 1 | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/25\/2024-scc-vol-8-part-1\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/25\/2024-scc-vol-8-part-1\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/2024-SCC-Vol.-8-Part-1.webp","datePublished":"2024-09-25T03:30:36+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"description":"Civil Procedure Code, 1908 \u2014 S. 11 \u2014 Res judicata \u2014 Applicability between co-defendants \u2014 Conditions","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/25\/2024-scc-vol-8-part-1\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/25\/2024-scc-vol-8-part-1\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/25\/2024-scc-vol-8-part-1\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/2024-SCC-Vol.-8-Part-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/2024-SCC-Vol.-8-Part-1.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"2024 SCC Vol. 8 Part 1"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/25\/2024-scc-vol-8-part-1\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"2024 SCC Vol. 8 Part 1"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/2024-SCC-Vol.-8-Part-1.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":204131,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/24\/principles-for-applicability-res-judicata-among-co-defendants-re-iterated-sc\/","url_meta":{"origin":331700,"position":0},"title":"Principles for applicability \u201cres judicata among co-defendants\u201d re-iterated: SC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 24, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: A Bench comprising of N.V. Ramana and M.M. Shantanagoudar, JJ., dismissed an appeal filed against the judgment of a Division Bench of Madras High Court whereby it allowed a letters patent appeal filed by the plaintiff in a partition suit. The plaintiff filed a suit in regard to\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":273570,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/12\/chhattisgarh-high-court-res-judicata-section11-code-of-civil-procedure-possession-landlord-tenant-directly-and-substantially-in-issue-heard-and-finally-decided-former-suit-subsequent-suit-title-a\/","url_meta":{"origin":331700,"position":1},"title":"Chhattisgarh High Court remands suit back to the Trial Court; Observes suit is not barred by Res Judicata and must be decided on merits","author":"Editor","date":"September 12, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Chhattisgarh High Court: In an appeal against the decision of Trial Court of dismissing the suit mainly on the ground that the suit preferred by the appellant was barred under the provisions of Section 11 Code of Civil Procedure,1908 (CPC), Arvind Singh Chandel, J. has observed that the suit preferred\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Chhattisgarh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-29-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-29-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-29-1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-29-1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-29-1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":254708,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/09\/25\/explained-res-judicata-question-of-fact-or-law-or-mixed-question-of-law-and-fact-can-it-be-decided-as-a-preliminary-issue\/","url_meta":{"origin":331700,"position":2},"title":"Explained| Res judicata: Question of fact or law or mixed question of law and fact? Can it be decided as a preliminary issue?","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"September 25, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: In an important ruling on Res Judicata, the 3-judge bench of Dr. DY Chandrachud*, Vikram Nath and Hima Kohli, JJ has held that the issues that arise in a subsequent suit may either be questions of fact or of law or mixed questions of law and fact. \"Issues\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":290829,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/28\/explained-supreme-court-verdict-on-application-of-principle-of-res-judicata-and-other-cpc-provisions-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":331700,"position":3},"title":"Explained| Supreme Court judgment on application of principle of Res Judicata and other CPC provisions","author":"Apoorva","date":"April 28, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Supreme Court said that before examining the defendants\u2019 ground of res judicata to oppose the eviction petition, several aspects may have to be looked into, like whether such an issue was substantively at issue in the previous suit and similar such other questions may crop up.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"latest judgement of supreme court on res judicata","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/latest-judgement-of-supreme-court-on-res-judicata.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/latest-judgement-of-supreme-court-on-res-judicata.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/latest-judgement-of-supreme-court-on-res-judicata.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/latest-judgement-of-supreme-court-on-res-judicata.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":283778,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/13\/2023-scc-vol-2-part-1\/","url_meta":{"origin":331700,"position":4},"title":"2023 SCC Vol. 2 Part 1","author":"Editor","date":"February 13, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Civil Procedure Code, 1908 \u2014 S. 11 \u2014 Res judicata \u2014 Applicability: Findings on issue(s) which actually fell for consideration in the previous proceedings alone can operate as res judicata. [Anil Kumar Modi v. Tarsem Kumar Gupta, (2023) 2 SCC 201] Constitution of India \u2014 Pts. III and IV-A \u2014\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Cases Reported"","block_context":{"text":"Cases Reported","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casesreported\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"2023 SCC Vol. 2 Part 1","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-375.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":212750,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/30\/all-hc-order-dismissing-first-writ-petition-operates-as-res-judicata-second-petition-on-same-facts-not-allowed\/","url_meta":{"origin":331700,"position":5},"title":"All HC | Order dismissing first writ petition operates as res judicata; second petition on same facts not allowed","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"March 30, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court: This writ petition was filed before a Divison Bench of Pankaj Kumar Jaiswal and Dr Yogendra Kumar Srivastava, JJ., for issuance of direction to respondent to consider the claim of petitioners for providing compensation in lieu of acquisition of plot situated in Village Pratap Patti District Varanasi\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/331700","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=331700"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/331700\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/331713"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=331700"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=331700"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=331700"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}