{"id":331585,"date":"2024-09-23T15:00:30","date_gmt":"2024-09-23T09:30:30","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=331585"},"modified":"2024-09-25T11:56:02","modified_gmt":"2024-09-25T06:26:02","slug":"raj-hc-upholds-the-method-of-redistributing-marks-of-deleted-questions-within-same-subject-scc-times","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/23\/raj-hc-upholds-the-method-of-redistributing-marks-of-deleted-questions-within-same-subject-scc-times\/","title":{"rendered":"Rajasthan High Court upholds the method of redistributing marks of deleted questions within same subject in Accountant Exam"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Rajasthan High Court:<\/span> In a writ petition challenging the method of distribution of marks for deleted questions in the Junior Accountant and Tehsil Revenue Accountant examination conducted by the Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, a single-judge bench of Vinit Kumar Mathur, J., held that redistribution of marks for deleted exam questions within the same subject is fair and impartial method, thereby preserving the exam structure and maintaining parity among candidates.<\/p>\n

In the instant matter, the petitioners, being eligible candidates for the post of Junior Accountant and Tehsil Revenue Accountant, filed applications in response to an advertisement dated 20-06-2023 issued by the Rajasthan Staff Selection Board. The exam scheme included two papers, each carrying 450 marks. A minimum of 35% in each paper and 40% aggregate was required, with 5% relaxation for SC\/ST candidates. After the exam, certain questions were deleted due to errors or confusion. The marks for these deleted questions were redistributed among the remaining questions in the same subject.<\/p>\n

The petitioners challenged this method of redistribution and argued that the deleted questions should either not be counted in the total marks or bonus marks should be awarded to all candidates. The petitioners contended that redistributing the marks of deleted questions within the same subject was unfair. The petitioners relied on precedents, including Jitendra Kumar Jhalani<\/span> v. State of Rajasthan<\/span>1<\/sup><\/a> and Ravi Kumar Khandelwal<\/span> v. State of Rajasthan<\/span>, 2015 SCC OnLine Raj 6180<\/a> where changes to exam rules after the exam was conducted were not allowed.<\/p>\n

However, the respondents argued that the method of redistributing marks for deleted questions within the same subject maintained parity. It was contended that since the exam was divided into subject-wise questions, redistributing the deleted question’s marks within the same subject preserved the exam’s structure. The respondents cited Vinod Kumar<\/span> v. State of Rajasthan<\/span>, 2020 SCC OnLine Raj 2282<\/a> and Narendra Singh Rathore<\/span> v. Rajasthan Public Service Commission<\/span>, 2017 SCC OnLine Raj 3887<\/a>, where similar methods were upheld by the court.<\/p>\n

The Court rejected the petitioners’ argument that the respondents had changed the rules after the selection process began, stating that the method adopted was fair, impartial, and did not prejudice the petitioners. The Court dismissed the petitioners’ reliance on mentioned precedents, as the facts of the cases are distinguishable.<\/p>\n

The Court referred to Vinod Kumar<\/span> (Supra) and noted that redistributing marks subject-wise ensures fairness and avoids altering the weightage of other subjects. The Court reasoned that distributing marks subject-wise, as opposed to across the entire exam, preserved the balance of the examination’s subject weightage. The Court stated that deleting questions and redistributing marks within the same subject ensured that candidates were fairly assessed based on their knowledge of that subject. The Court asserted that the system used ensured fairness, as candidates would not be penalised for the deletion of questions, and therefore, no discrimination occurred.<\/p>\n

The Court stated that “if the procedure adopted by the respondents is fair and impartial and because of that even if some candidates are adversely affected, the Court may refrain from intervening for larger benefit of the candidates, who have participated in the selection process.”<\/span> The Court upheld the method of redistributing the marks of deleted questions within the same subject. The Court dismissed the writ petition and disposed of all pending applications.<\/p>\n

[Surendra Choudhary<\/span> v. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Jaipur<\/span>, 2024 SCC OnLine Raj 2814<\/a>, Decided on 11-09-2024<\/span>]<\/p>\n\n

Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n

Mr. Vivek Firoda and Mr. Jayram Saran, Counsel for the Petitioners<\/p>\n

Mr. Manish Patel, AAG, Mr. Rakesh Arora and Mr. Naresh Singh, Counsel for the Respondents<\/p>\n<\/div>\n\n

1.<\/a> S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.16800\/2012.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

“Deletion of questions from a particular subject and distribution of their marks proportionately in the remaining questions of the same subject does not make any discrimination between the candidates.”<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67514,"featured_media":314824,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[73403,6751,73404,67794,2575,73405,73402],"class_list":["post-331585","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-deleted-questions","tag-examination","tag-junior-accountant-and-tehsil-revenue-accountant-examination","tag-justice-vinit-kumar-mathur","tag-Rajasthan_High_Court","tag-rajasthan-staff-selection-board","tag-redistribution-of-marks"],"yoast_head":"\nRajasthan High Court upholds the method of redistributing marks of deleted questions within same subject | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Rajasthan High Court upheld the method of redistributing marks of deleted questions within same subject.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/23\/raj-hc-upholds-the-method-of-redistributing-marks-of-deleted-questions-within-same-subject-scc-times\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Rajasthan High Court upholds the method of redistributing marks of deleted questions within same subject in Accountant Exam\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Rajasthan High Court upheld the method of redistributing marks of deleted questions within same subject.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/23\/raj-hc-upholds-the-method-of-redistributing-marks-of-deleted-questions-within-same-subject-scc-times\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-09-23T09:30:30+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-09-25T06:26:02+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"591\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Rajasthan High Court upholds the method of redistributing marks of deleted questions within same subject in Accountant Exam\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/23\/raj-hc-upholds-the-method-of-redistributing-marks-of-deleted-questions-within-same-subject-scc-times\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/23\/raj-hc-upholds-the-method-of-redistributing-marks-of-deleted-questions-within-same-subject-scc-times\/\",\"name\":\"Rajasthan High Court upholds the method of redistributing marks of deleted questions within same subject | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/23\/raj-hc-upholds-the-method-of-redistributing-marks-of-deleted-questions-within-same-subject-scc-times\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/23\/raj-hc-upholds-the-method-of-redistributing-marks-of-deleted-questions-within-same-subject-scc-times\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-09-23T09:30:30+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-09-25T06:26:02+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\"},\"description\":\"Rajasthan High Court upheld the method of redistributing marks of deleted questions within same subject.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/23\/raj-hc-upholds-the-method-of-redistributing-marks-of-deleted-questions-within-same-subject-scc-times\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/23\/raj-hc-upholds-the-method-of-redistributing-marks-of-deleted-questions-within-same-subject-scc-times\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/23\/raj-hc-upholds-the-method-of-redistributing-marks-of-deleted-questions-within-same-subject-scc-times\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp\",\"width\":887,\"height\":591,\"caption\":\"Rajasthan High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/23\/raj-hc-upholds-the-method-of-redistributing-marks-of-deleted-questions-within-same-subject-scc-times\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Rajasthan High Court upholds the method of redistributing marks of deleted questions within same subject in Accountant Exam\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\",\"name\":\"Ritu\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Ritu\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_7\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Rajasthan High Court upholds the method of redistributing marks of deleted questions within same subject | SCC Times","description":"Rajasthan High Court upheld the method of redistributing marks of deleted questions within same subject.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/23\/raj-hc-upholds-the-method-of-redistributing-marks-of-deleted-questions-within-same-subject-scc-times\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Rajasthan High Court upholds the method of redistributing marks of deleted questions within same subject in Accountant Exam","og_description":"Rajasthan High Court upheld the method of redistributing marks of deleted questions within same subject.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/23\/raj-hc-upholds-the-method-of-redistributing-marks-of-deleted-questions-within-same-subject-scc-times\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2024-09-23T09:30:30+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-09-25T06:26:02+00:00","og_image":[{"width":887,"height":591,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Ritu","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Rajasthan High Court upholds the method of redistributing marks of deleted questions within same subject in Accountant Exam","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Ritu","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/23\/raj-hc-upholds-the-method-of-redistributing-marks-of-deleted-questions-within-same-subject-scc-times\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/23\/raj-hc-upholds-the-method-of-redistributing-marks-of-deleted-questions-within-same-subject-scc-times\/","name":"Rajasthan High Court upholds the method of redistributing marks of deleted questions within same subject | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/23\/raj-hc-upholds-the-method-of-redistributing-marks-of-deleted-questions-within-same-subject-scc-times\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/23\/raj-hc-upholds-the-method-of-redistributing-marks-of-deleted-questions-within-same-subject-scc-times\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp","datePublished":"2024-09-23T09:30:30+00:00","dateModified":"2024-09-25T06:26:02+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9"},"description":"Rajasthan High Court upheld the method of redistributing marks of deleted questions within same subject.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/23\/raj-hc-upholds-the-method-of-redistributing-marks-of-deleted-questions-within-same-subject-scc-times\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/23\/raj-hc-upholds-the-method-of-redistributing-marks-of-deleted-questions-within-same-subject-scc-times\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/23\/raj-hc-upholds-the-method-of-redistributing-marks-of-deleted-questions-within-same-subject-scc-times\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp","width":887,"height":591,"caption":"Rajasthan High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/23\/raj-hc-upholds-the-method-of-redistributing-marks-of-deleted-questions-within-same-subject-scc-times\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Rajasthan High Court upholds the method of redistributing marks of deleted questions within same subject in Accountant Exam"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9","name":"Ritu","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Ritu"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_7\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":219599,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/16\/raj-hc-court-dismisses-an-application-to-reappear-in-exam-held-reappearance-in-board-exam-only-for-increasing-marks-in-same-subjects-and-not-new-subjects\/","url_meta":{"origin":331585,"position":0},"title":"Raj HC | Court dismisses an application to reappear in exam; held, reappearance in Board exam only for increasing marks in same subjects and not new subjects","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 16, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Rajasthan High Court: Sangeet Lodha, J. dismissed a writ petition seeking directions to the Board of Secondary Education to permit him to appear for Class XII examination in the subject Geography. The relevant facts of the case being the petitioner-candidate had appeared in Class XII Board Examinations in 2017 and\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":314813,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/21\/raj-hc-directs-examination-cell-to-constitute-an-expert-committee-for-examination-of-copies-scctimes\/","url_meta":{"origin":331585,"position":1},"title":"[Higher Judicial Service Examination] Rajasthan HC directs Examination Cell to constitute an Expert Committee of eminent Jurists\/Professors for examination of copies","author":"Arushi","date":"February 21, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cGetting few answer-sheets evaluated by an Expert Committee would do justice not only to the Examinees, but to the Examiners as well.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Rajasthan High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":263761,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/16\/sc-allows-rpsc-to-go-ahead-with-ras-mains-exam-candidates-challenging-pre-exam-result-allowed-to-sit-in-mains-heres-how-their-result-to-be-declared\/","url_meta":{"origin":331585,"position":2},"title":"SC allows RPSC to go ahead with RAS Mains Exam; Candidates challenging Pre exam result allowed to sit in Mains. Here’s how their result to be declared","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"March 16, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: In a breather to the candidates challenging the RAS Pre-examination result, the bench of KM Joseph and Hrishikesh Roy, JJ has confirmed the Rajasthan High Court\u2019s division bench directing Rajasthan Public Service Commission (RPSC) to go ahead with the RAS\/RTS Combined Competitive Examination-2021 mains examination. It has, however,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/RPSC-can-go-ahead-with-RAS-Mains-Exam-Candidates-challenging-Pre-exam-result-allowed-to-sit-in-Mains.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/RPSC-can-go-ahead-with-RAS-Mains-Exam-Candidates-challenging-Pre-exam-result-allowed-to-sit-in-Mains.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/RPSC-can-go-ahead-with-RAS-Mains-Exam-Candidates-challenging-Pre-exam-result-allowed-to-sit-in-Mains.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/RPSC-can-go-ahead-with-RAS-Mains-Exam-Candidates-challenging-Pre-exam-result-allowed-to-sit-in-Mains.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/RPSC-can-go-ahead-with-RAS-Mains-Exam-Candidates-challenging-Pre-exam-result-allowed-to-sit-in-Mains.png?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":88591,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/11\/29\/appointment-of-addl-judges-rajasthan-high-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":331585,"position":3},"title":"Appointment of Addl. Judges, Rajasthan High Court","author":"Saba","date":"November 29, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"The President in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (1) of Article 224 of the\u00a0Constitution of India \u00a0appointed S\/Shri \u00a0Sanjeev Prakash\u00a0Sharma, \u00a0Dr. Pushpendra Singh Bhati, \u00a0Dinesh Mehta, and \u00a0Vinit Kumar Mathur, to be Additional Judges of the Rajasthan High Court, in that order of\u00a0seniority, for a period of two\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Appointments & Transfers"","block_context":{"text":"Appointments & Transfers","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/appointments\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":217636,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/02\/raj-hc-typographical-error-in-erstwhile-order-rectified-by-division-bench-thus-including-various-candidates-to-undertake-mains-examination\/","url_meta":{"origin":331585,"position":4},"title":"Raj HC | Typographical error in erstwhile order rectified by Division Bench thus including various candidates to undertake mains examination","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 2, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Rajasthan High Court: A Division Bench of Narendra Singh Dhaddha and Mohammad Rafiq, JJ. disposed of a writ petition seeking to correct a bonafide error in an order passed by the present Court. The present case relates to several writ petitions filed by the petitioners claiming for clarifying\/modifying a typographical\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":80121,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/10\/19\/no-interference-with-the-10-concession-granted-by-state-of-rajasthan-to-reserved-category-candidates-in-tet-by-letter-dt-23-03-2011\/","url_meta":{"origin":331585,"position":5},"title":"No interference with the 10% concession granted by State of Rajasthan to reserved category candidates in TET by letter dt. 23.03.2011","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"October 19, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: Refusing to interfere with the 10% concession granted by the State of Rajasthan to reserved category candidates in TET by the letter dated 23.03.2011 as on that basis, two recruitment tests have been conducted and candidates who have been selected are now teaching for last number of years,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/331585","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67514"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=331585"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/331585\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/314824"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=331585"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=331585"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=331585"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}