{"id":331261,"date":"2024-09-20T17:00:08","date_gmt":"2024-09-20T11:30:08","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=331261"},"modified":"2024-09-20T18:55:45","modified_gmt":"2024-09-20T13:25:45","slug":"car-manufacturer-hyundai-santro-liablity-omission-of-car-dealer-scdrc-legal-news","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/20\/car-manufacturer-hyundai-santro-liablity-omission-of-car-dealer-scdrc-legal-news\/","title":{"rendered":"Whether a car manufacturer be held liable for the wrongdoings\/omissions of a car dealer? SCDRC answers"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (SCDRC), Delhi:<\/span> In the instant appeal wherein the Commission had to deliberate whether a car manufacturer, can be held liable in the event a car dealer cannot be served with the DCDRC&#8217;s order; the Bench of <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Sangita Dhingra Sehgal, J<\/span>.<span style=\"font-weight: bold;\"> (President)<\/span> and JP Agrawal (Member), after considering the facts of the case, held that a car manufacturer cannot be held liable for the omissions or wrongdoing on the part of the dealer.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The complainant upon getting impressed by a lucrative deal on Hyundai Santro car via a newspaper advertisement, approached Respondent 1, who was an authorized dealer of Hyundai and deposited Rs 3.32 Lakhs. Copies of the receipts were given to the complainant.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Respondent 1 assured the complainant that the car would be delivered to him on or before 31-9-2009. The same, however, did not happen and the complainant was told to wait till 10-2-2009.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">On 10-2-2009, when the complainant visited to take his car&#8217;s delivery, he was shocked to see that Respondent 1&#8217;s showroom was shut down. Hence, the complainant filed a police complaint alleging that he was cheated of Rs 3.32 Lakhs by Respondent 1. Furthermore, the complainant approached Respondent 2 (manufacturer) and Respondent 3 (customer relations officer) to complain, wherein he was assured that action would be taken on the matter within 3 working days.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">All efforts in vain, the complainant approached the DCDRC seeking delivery of the booked car, interest and compensation of Rs 1 Lakh for mental agony.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The DCDRC upon considering the facts of the case held that the complainant had utterly failed to establish any nexus between himself and Respondents 2 and 3. The DCDRC however held that Respondent 1 could not escape his liability for breach of commitment and directed him refund the booking amount with interest.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Aggrieved with the afore-stated ruling, the complainant approached the SCDRC stating that lack of Respondent 1&#8217;s current address prevented the execution of DCDRC&#8217;s order. The complainant further stated that since Respondents 2 and 3 have not admitted to the termination of their dealership with Respondent 1, therefore they cannot absolve themselves from liability.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Perusing the matter, the SCDRC relying on relevant precedents of Supreme Court and NCDRC, noted that there was no manufacturer-dealer agreement on record, therefore the Commission assumed that the agreement was based on a principal-to-principal relationship.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The SCDRC further noted that the booking amount paid by the complainant to Respondent 1 was not transferred to the manufacturer i.e., Respondents 2 and 3. Hence, there was no privity of contract between the complainant and Respondents 2 and 3; therefore, they cannot be held liable.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">With the afore-stated assessment, the SCDRC upheld the decision of DCDRC and the instant appeal was dismissed. <\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">X v. Suhrit Hyundai, First Appeal No. 101\/2015, decided on 2-9-2024<\/span>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000080;\">Order by Justice Sangita Dhingra Sehgal, President<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Complainant:<\/span> Kapil Chawla, Advocate<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">The complainant upon getting impressed by a lucrative deal on Hyundai Santro car via a newspaper advertisement, approached the authorized dealer of Hyundai and deposited booking amount, but did not receive the delivery as assured.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":331301,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,11],"tags":[73330,73331,45916,50169,73329,58058,47982],"class_list":["post-331261","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-tribunals_commissions_regulatorybodies","tag-car-dealer","tag-car-manufacturer","tag-consumer-case","tag-consumer-court","tag-hyundai-santro","tag-privity-of-contract","tag-scdrc"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Whether car manufacturer can be held liable for the wrongdoings\/ omissions of a car dealer? SCDRC answers<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"The complainant upon getting impressed by a lucrative deal on Hyundai Santro car approached the authorized dealer, deposited booking amount, but did not receive the delivery as assured.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/20\/car-manufacturer-hyundai-santro-liablity-omission-of-car-dealer-scdrc-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Whether a car manufacturer be held liable for the wrongdoings\/omissions of a car dealer? SCDRC answers\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The complainant upon getting impressed by a lucrative deal on Hyundai Santro car approached the authorized dealer, deposited booking amount, but did not receive the delivery as assured.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/20\/car-manufacturer-hyundai-santro-liablity-omission-of-car-dealer-scdrc-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-09-20T11:30:08+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-09-20T13:25:45+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/02-239.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Whether a car manufacturer be held liable for the wrongdoings\/omissions of a car dealer? SCDRC answers\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/20\/car-manufacturer-hyundai-santro-liablity-omission-of-car-dealer-scdrc-legal-news\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/20\/car-manufacturer-hyundai-santro-liablity-omission-of-car-dealer-scdrc-legal-news\/\",\"name\":\"Whether car manufacturer can be held liable for the wrongdoings\/ omissions of a car dealer? SCDRC answers\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/20\/car-manufacturer-hyundai-santro-liablity-omission-of-car-dealer-scdrc-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/20\/car-manufacturer-hyundai-santro-liablity-omission-of-car-dealer-scdrc-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/02-239.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-09-20T11:30:08+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-09-20T13:25:45+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\"},\"description\":\"The complainant upon getting impressed by a lucrative deal on Hyundai Santro car approached the authorized dealer, deposited booking amount, but did not receive the delivery as assured.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/20\/car-manufacturer-hyundai-santro-liablity-omission-of-car-dealer-scdrc-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/20\/car-manufacturer-hyundai-santro-liablity-omission-of-car-dealer-scdrc-legal-news\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/20\/car-manufacturer-hyundai-santro-liablity-omission-of-car-dealer-scdrc-legal-news\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/02-239.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/02-239.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"car manufacturer liable for wrongdoings\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/20\/car-manufacturer-hyundai-santro-liablity-omission-of-car-dealer-scdrc-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Whether a car manufacturer be held liable for the wrongdoings\/omissions of a car dealer? SCDRC answers\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\",\"name\":\"Sucheta\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Sucheta\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Whether car manufacturer can be held liable for the wrongdoings\/ omissions of a car dealer? SCDRC answers","description":"The complainant upon getting impressed by a lucrative deal on Hyundai Santro car approached the authorized dealer, deposited booking amount, but did not receive the delivery as assured.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/20\/car-manufacturer-hyundai-santro-liablity-omission-of-car-dealer-scdrc-legal-news\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Whether a car manufacturer be held liable for the wrongdoings\/omissions of a car dealer? SCDRC answers","og_description":"The complainant upon getting impressed by a lucrative deal on Hyundai Santro car approached the authorized dealer, deposited booking amount, but did not receive the delivery as assured.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/20\/car-manufacturer-hyundai-santro-liablity-omission-of-car-dealer-scdrc-legal-news\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2024-09-20T11:30:08+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-09-20T13:25:45+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/02-239.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Sucheta","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Whether a car manufacturer be held liable for the wrongdoings\/omissions of a car dealer? SCDRC answers","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Sucheta","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/20\/car-manufacturer-hyundai-santro-liablity-omission-of-car-dealer-scdrc-legal-news\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/20\/car-manufacturer-hyundai-santro-liablity-omission-of-car-dealer-scdrc-legal-news\/","name":"Whether car manufacturer can be held liable for the wrongdoings\/ omissions of a car dealer? SCDRC answers","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/20\/car-manufacturer-hyundai-santro-liablity-omission-of-car-dealer-scdrc-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/20\/car-manufacturer-hyundai-santro-liablity-omission-of-car-dealer-scdrc-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/02-239.webp","datePublished":"2024-09-20T11:30:08+00:00","dateModified":"2024-09-20T13:25:45+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa"},"description":"The complainant upon getting impressed by a lucrative deal on Hyundai Santro car approached the authorized dealer, deposited booking amount, but did not receive the delivery as assured.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/20\/car-manufacturer-hyundai-santro-liablity-omission-of-car-dealer-scdrc-legal-news\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/20\/car-manufacturer-hyundai-santro-liablity-omission-of-car-dealer-scdrc-legal-news\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/20\/car-manufacturer-hyundai-santro-liablity-omission-of-car-dealer-scdrc-legal-news\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/02-239.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/02-239.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"car manufacturer liable for wrongdoings"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/20\/car-manufacturer-hyundai-santro-liablity-omission-of-car-dealer-scdrc-legal-news\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Whether a car manufacturer be held liable for the wrongdoings\/omissions of a car dealer? SCDRC answers"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa","name":"Sucheta","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Sucheta"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/02-239.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":320306,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/18\/non-deployment-airbags-scdrc-compensation-order-set-aside-ncdrc-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":331261,"position":0},"title":"NCDRC sets aside SCDRC\u2019s Rs 1 Lakh compensation order against Honda Cars due to lack of expert opinion on non-deployment of the airbags","author":"Sucheta","date":"April 18, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"NCDRC pointed out that the State Commission\u2019s finding that non-deployment of the airbags when the respondent\u2019s car crashed, warranted punitive damages, was not based on any finding of fact or legal precedent.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/National-Consumer-Disputes-Redressal-Commission.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/National-Consumer-Disputes-Redressal-Commission.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/National-Consumer-Disputes-Redressal-Commission.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/National-Consumer-Disputes-Redressal-Commission.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":331932,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/27\/mercedes-benz-airbags-manufacturing-defect-claim-scdrc-order-ncdrc-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":331261,"position":1},"title":"NCDRC upholds SCDRC order dismissing claims of manufacturing defect in Mercedes-Benz car due to non-deployment of air bags","author":"Sucheta","date":"September 27, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Commission noted that the appellant\u2019s claim regarding non-deployment of air bags due to manufacturing defect, was not well established through any Expert Opinion.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/National-Consumer-Disputes-Redressal-Commission.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/National-Consumer-Disputes-Redressal-Commission.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/National-Consumer-Disputes-Redressal-Commission.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/National-Consumer-Disputes-Redressal-Commission.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":45771,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/05\/05\/tata-motors-ltd-held-vicariously-liable-for-the-omissions-and-commissions-of-its-dealers\/","url_meta":{"origin":331261,"position":2},"title":"Tata Motors Ltd. held vicariously liable for the omissions and commissions of its dealers","author":"Sucheta","date":"May 5, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC):\u00a0In a recent case, NCDRC has observed that Tata Motors Ltd. is vicariously liable for the omissions and commissions of its dealers and the dealers must not be permitted to indulge in unfair activities like fraudulently selling used car to a customer as new. The\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":378433,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/13\/delhi-scdrc-fiat-india-to-replace-defective-jeep-wrangler\/","url_meta":{"origin":331261,"position":3},"title":"\u2018Manufacturer\u2019s liability for defective goods\u2019: Delhi SCDRC orders FIAT India Automobiles for replacement of car worth Rs. 70 lakhs","author":"Aastha","date":"March 13, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cIn view of the unrebutted testimony of the Complainant, there is no reason to discredit the submissions of the Complainant against Opposite Party 1.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Fiat India to replace defective Jeep Wrangler","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/Fiat-India-to-replace-defective-Jeep-Wrangler.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/Fiat-India-to-replace-defective-Jeep-Wrangler.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/Fiat-India-to-replace-defective-Jeep-Wrangler.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/Fiat-India-to-replace-defective-Jeep-Wrangler.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":308286,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/02\/speed-post-sender-consumer-protection-act-postal-department-liablity-deficiency-of-service-scdrc-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":331261,"position":4},"title":"Speed post sender is a consumer under Consumer Protection Act; Postal Dept. cannot escape liability by virtue of S 6 of Indian Post Office Act, 1898, SCDRC reiterates","author":"Sucheta","date":"December 2, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"State Commission relying on NCDRC precedents, upheld District Consumer Commission\u2019s decision to hold the Postal Department liable for delayed delivery of a speed post by 19 days which resulted the complainant\u2019s son to miss his chance to get admission in JNU.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"postal department speed post","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/postal-department-speed-post.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/postal-department-speed-post.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/postal-department-speed-post.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/postal-department-speed-post.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":351338,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/24\/costs-imposed-on-consumer-repair-damaged-hyundai-car-despite-sale-dcdrc-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":331261,"position":5},"title":"DCDRC imposes costs of Rs 40,000 on consumer seeking to repair\/replace his damaged Hyundai car despite selling it","author":"Sucheta","date":"June 24, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"A consumer had filed a complaint before the DCDRC seeking repair or replacement of his damaged Hyundai car and compensation of Rs 5 Lakhs for mental agony and deficiency of service.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"DCDRC finds Matrimony.Com Ltd. liable for deficiency in service for failing to deliver video album of a marriage reception held in 2017","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/District-Consumer-Disputes-Redressal-Commission.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/District-Consumer-Disputes-Redressal-Commission.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/District-Consumer-Disputes-Redressal-Commission.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/District-Consumer-Disputes-Redressal-Commission.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/331261","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=331261"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/331261\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/331301"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=331261"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=331261"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=331261"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}