{"id":331060,"date":"2024-09-18T17:15:50","date_gmt":"2024-09-18T11:45:50","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=331060"},"modified":"2024-09-25T10:44:21","modified_gmt":"2024-09-25T05:14:21","slug":"raj-hc-quashes-corruption-charges-against-100-year-old-man-old-wife-due-to-18-years-delay-in-trial-scc-times","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/18\/raj-hc-quashes-corruption-charges-against-100-year-old-man-old-wife-due-to-18-years-delay-in-trial-scc-times\/","title":{"rendered":"[Right to fair &amp; speedy trial] Rajasthan High Court quashes corruption charges against 100-year-old man and his 96-year-old wife due to 18-years Trial delay"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Rajasthan High Court:<\/span> In a criminal miscellaneous petition challenging the 10 years delay in trial process and seeking the quashment of the charges in the alleged corruption case, a single-judge bench of Arun Monga, J., quashed the charges against petitioner 2 (father), petitioner 3 (mother), and petitioner 4 (wife), citing the prolonged delay, lack of evidence, and the health conditions of the elderly parents and ordered the trial for petitioner 1 to continue with priority.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Factual Matrix<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In the instant matter, an FIR was lodged on 19-04-2006 by the Anti-Corruption Bureau, against petitioner 1, and his family members (petitioners 2 to 4) for the alleged offenses of amassing disproportionate assets during his tenure as a Development Officer. Following a raid, the accounts and property documents of the petitioners were seized. Additionally, the personal belongings like &#8220;stree-dhan&#8221; of petitioner 4 (petitioner&#8217;s wife) and his daughter-in-law were also seized from a bank locker.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In 2014, after eight years of investigation, a charge-sheet was filed, implicating petitioner and his family, including income derived from the petitioner&#8217;s brother, who was also in government service, for accumulating assets beyond their known sources of income. Despite the charge sheet being filed in 2014, no significant steps had been taken for trial progress for 10 years, prompting the petitioners to file a miscellaneous petition challenging the delay and seeking the quashing of the charges.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Parties&#8217; Contentions<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The petitioners argued that the delay in concluding the trial is unjust, prejudicial, and violates their right to a speedy trial. The petitioners pointed out the advanced age and precarious health conditions of petitioners 2 (100 years old) and petiitoner 3 (96 years old) and requested the quashment of proceedings against them. It was asserted that the prosecution had not presented any significant evidence since filing the charge sheet, indicating that the allegations may be baseless. However, the prosecution argued that petitioner 1 is the prime accused and does not deserve any concessions, though it did not dispute the poor health of petitioners 2 and 3.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Moot Point<\/p>\n<ol style=\"list-style-type: decimal;\">\n<li>\n<p>Whether the prolonged delay of over 18 years in concluding the trial violates the petitioners&#8217; right to a fair and speedy trial?<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p>Whether the inclusion of family members (petitioners 2 to 4) in the charge sheet is justified given their lack of direct involvement in the alleged offense?<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Whether the charge sheet should be quashed, especially considering the age and health conditions of petitioners 2 (father) and 3 (mother)?<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Court&#8217;s Analysis<\/p>\n<p>The Court highlighted the importance of a fair and speedy trial and acknowledged that the delay of over 18 years, with no progress since the filing of the charge sheet in 2014, is unreasonable and violated the petitioners&#8217; right to a just trial.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%; margin-left: 36pt; font-weight: bold;\">&#8220;This delay, despite no fault on the part of the petitioners, violates their right to a fair and speedy trial &#8230; Such delay undermines the legal principle that justice delayed is justice denied. No doubt, conversely, justice hurried is justice buried. But the case in hand is of former category and not latter.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p style=\"\">The Court found that the inclusion of petitioners 2, 3, and 4 in the investigation extended beyond what was necessary and caused undue hardship to the family. The Court noted that petitioners 2 and 3, given their age (aged 100 and 96) and health, should not be subjected to such prolonged legal proceedings. The Court opined that a compelling ground is made out for quashing the charges against petitioners 2, 3, and 4 as they have already <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">&#8220;suffered the pangs of protracted litigation without even a flicker of light in the tunnel, during twilight years of their lives&#8221;.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%; margin-left: 36pt; font-weight: bold;\">&#8220;The advanced age and health issues of the petitioners&#8217; parents demand a humanitarian approach. Forcing individuals nearing the end of their lives to endure a prolonged legal battle without any substantive charges against them is both cruel and unjust.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court further highlighted the prosecution&#8217;s inconsistency, especially the fact that the petitioner&#8217;s brother was not being prosecuted due to the lack of sanction, which raised doubts about the overall credibility of the case.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Court&#8217;s Decision<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court quashed the charges against petitioner 2 (father), petitioner 3 (mother), and petitioner 4 (wife) on compassionate grounds, citing the prolonged delay, lack of evidence, and the health conditions of the elderly parents. The Court ordered the trial for petitioner 1 to proceed without unnecessary adjournments and directed the prosecution to expedite the trial.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Ram Lal Patidar<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">State of Rajasthan<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/C2YeAWC0\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2024 SCC OnLine Raj 2786<\/a>, Decided on 28-08-2024<\/span>]<\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">Mr. Gajendra Singh Rathore, Counsel for the Petitioners<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">Mr. Vikram Rajpuohit, P.P. and Mr. Ratan Singh Rajpurohit, SI, Anti-Corruption Bureau, Counsel for the Respondents<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">&#8220;The absence of any progress, despite the charge sheet being filed in 2014, raises serious concerns about the administration of justice. Such delay undermines the legal principle that justice delayed is justice denied.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67514,"featured_media":314824,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[73242,73244,73243,32394,73245,67205,73246,73247,13001,2575,73248],"class_list":["post-331060","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-100-year-old-man","tag-18-years-trial-delay","tag-96-year-old-woman","tag-corruption-charges","tag-delay-in-trial","tag-justice-arun-monga","tag-justice-delayed","tag-justice-denied","tag-quashment","tag-Rajasthan_High_Court","tag-right-to-fair-and-speedy-trial"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Rajasthan High Court quashes corruption charges against 100-year-old man and 96-year-old wife due to 18-years delay in Trial | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Rajasthan High Court quashes corruption charges against 100-year-old man and 96-year-old wife due to 18-years delay in Trial\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/18\/raj-hc-quashes-corruption-charges-against-100-year-old-man-old-wife-due-to-18-years-delay-in-trial-scc-times\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"[Right to fair &amp; speedy trial] Rajasthan High Court quashes corruption charges against 100-year-old man and his 96-year-old wife due to 18-years Trial delay\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Rajasthan High Court quashes corruption charges against 100-year-old man and 96-year-old wife due to 18-years delay in Trial\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/18\/raj-hc-quashes-corruption-charges-against-100-year-old-man-old-wife-due-to-18-years-delay-in-trial-scc-times\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-09-18T11:45:50+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-09-25T05:14:21+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"591\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"[Right to fair &amp; speedy trial] Rajasthan High Court quashes corruption charges against 100-year-old man and his 96-year-old wife due to 18-years Trial delay\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/18\/raj-hc-quashes-corruption-charges-against-100-year-old-man-old-wife-due-to-18-years-delay-in-trial-scc-times\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/18\/raj-hc-quashes-corruption-charges-against-100-year-old-man-old-wife-due-to-18-years-delay-in-trial-scc-times\/\",\"name\":\"Rajasthan High Court quashes corruption charges against 100-year-old man and 96-year-old wife due to 18-years delay in Trial | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/18\/raj-hc-quashes-corruption-charges-against-100-year-old-man-old-wife-due-to-18-years-delay-in-trial-scc-times\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/18\/raj-hc-quashes-corruption-charges-against-100-year-old-man-old-wife-due-to-18-years-delay-in-trial-scc-times\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-09-18T11:45:50+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-09-25T05:14:21+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\"},\"description\":\"Rajasthan High Court quashes corruption charges against 100-year-old man and 96-year-old wife due to 18-years delay in Trial\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/18\/raj-hc-quashes-corruption-charges-against-100-year-old-man-old-wife-due-to-18-years-delay-in-trial-scc-times\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/18\/raj-hc-quashes-corruption-charges-against-100-year-old-man-old-wife-due-to-18-years-delay-in-trial-scc-times\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/18\/raj-hc-quashes-corruption-charges-against-100-year-old-man-old-wife-due-to-18-years-delay-in-trial-scc-times\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp\",\"width\":887,\"height\":591,\"caption\":\"Rajasthan High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/18\/raj-hc-quashes-corruption-charges-against-100-year-old-man-old-wife-due-to-18-years-delay-in-trial-scc-times\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"[Right to fair &amp; speedy trial] Rajasthan High Court quashes corruption charges against 100-year-old man and his 96-year-old wife due to 18-years Trial delay\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\",\"name\":\"Ritu\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Ritu\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_7\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Rajasthan High Court quashes corruption charges against 100-year-old man and 96-year-old wife due to 18-years delay in Trial | SCC Times","description":"Rajasthan High Court quashes corruption charges against 100-year-old man and 96-year-old wife due to 18-years delay in Trial","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/18\/raj-hc-quashes-corruption-charges-against-100-year-old-man-old-wife-due-to-18-years-delay-in-trial-scc-times\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"[Right to fair & speedy trial] Rajasthan High Court quashes corruption charges against 100-year-old man and his 96-year-old wife due to 18-years Trial delay","og_description":"Rajasthan High Court quashes corruption charges against 100-year-old man and 96-year-old wife due to 18-years delay in Trial","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/18\/raj-hc-quashes-corruption-charges-against-100-year-old-man-old-wife-due-to-18-years-delay-in-trial-scc-times\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2024-09-18T11:45:50+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-09-25T05:14:21+00:00","og_image":[{"width":887,"height":591,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Ritu","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"[Right to fair &amp; speedy trial] Rajasthan High Court quashes corruption charges against 100-year-old man and his 96-year-old wife due to 18-years Trial delay","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Ritu","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/18\/raj-hc-quashes-corruption-charges-against-100-year-old-man-old-wife-due-to-18-years-delay-in-trial-scc-times\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/18\/raj-hc-quashes-corruption-charges-against-100-year-old-man-old-wife-due-to-18-years-delay-in-trial-scc-times\/","name":"Rajasthan High Court quashes corruption charges against 100-year-old man and 96-year-old wife due to 18-years delay in Trial | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/18\/raj-hc-quashes-corruption-charges-against-100-year-old-man-old-wife-due-to-18-years-delay-in-trial-scc-times\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/18\/raj-hc-quashes-corruption-charges-against-100-year-old-man-old-wife-due-to-18-years-delay-in-trial-scc-times\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp","datePublished":"2024-09-18T11:45:50+00:00","dateModified":"2024-09-25T05:14:21+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9"},"description":"Rajasthan High Court quashes corruption charges against 100-year-old man and 96-year-old wife due to 18-years delay in Trial","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/18\/raj-hc-quashes-corruption-charges-against-100-year-old-man-old-wife-due-to-18-years-delay-in-trial-scc-times\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/18\/raj-hc-quashes-corruption-charges-against-100-year-old-man-old-wife-due-to-18-years-delay-in-trial-scc-times\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/18\/raj-hc-quashes-corruption-charges-against-100-year-old-man-old-wife-due-to-18-years-delay-in-trial-scc-times\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp","width":887,"height":591,"caption":"Rajasthan High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/18\/raj-hc-quashes-corruption-charges-against-100-year-old-man-old-wife-due-to-18-years-delay-in-trial-scc-times\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"[Right to fair &amp; speedy trial] Rajasthan High Court quashes corruption charges against 100-year-old man and his 96-year-old wife due to 18-years Trial delay"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9","name":"Ritu","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Ritu"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_7\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":331996,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/27\/any-further-investigation-after-filling-of-police-report-requires-trial-courts-permission-under-section-1939-of-bnss-rajasthan-high-court-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":331060,"position":0},"title":"\u201cAny further investigation after filling of Police Report requires trial court\u2019s permission under Section 193(9) of BNSS\u201d: Rajasthan High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"September 27, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court noted that since the petitioner was not found to be involved in any offence, his plea for quashing the FIR no longer required adjudication.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Rajasthan High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":266013,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/27\/power-of-revision-vis-a-vis-stage-of-framing-of-charges\/","url_meta":{"origin":331060,"position":1},"title":"Power of Revision vis a vis Stage of Framing of charges; Strong suspicion at the initial stage is sufficient for the court to proceed with framing of charges","author":"Editor","date":"April 27, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Rajasthan High Court: Pushpendra Singh Bhati, J., refused to interfere with the impugned order due to lack of any legal infirmity. The facts of the case are such that an F.I.R., was lodged against the revisionist-petitioner for the offences under Sections 13 (1) (e) \/ 13 (2) of the Prevention\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":331269,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/20\/rajasthan-high-court-consolidates-trials-for-259-firs-against-sanjivani-group-chairman-upholds-right-to-fair-and-speedy-trial-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":331060,"position":2},"title":"Rajasthan High Court consolidates trials for 259 FIRs against Sanjivani Group Chairman; Upholds Right to Fair and Speedy Trial","author":"Ritu","date":"September 20, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cWhether the proceeding against the accused shall be called as prosecution or it would be a persecution. Whether it\u2019s a persecution or be it a prosecution but in anyway it must come to an end within a reasonable period.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Rajasthan High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":367781,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/26\/all-hc-calls-up-trial-court-for-lethargy-in-duty\/","url_meta":{"origin":331060,"position":3},"title":"73-year-old being harassed for 20 years: Allahabad High Court calls up Trial Court for &#8220;lethargy in duty&#8221;","author":"Editor","date":"November 26, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe Trial Court after almost 11 years issued Non-Bailable Warrants to the persecution witnesses but till date, not a single witness has appeared before it to give evidence.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Trial Court lethargy in duty","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Trial-Court-lethargy-in-duty.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Trial-Court-lethargy-in-duty.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Trial-Court-lethargy-in-duty.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Trial-Court-lethargy-in-duty.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":282441,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/25\/fundamental-right-to-speedy-trial-has-been-violated-allahabad-high-court-quashed-criminal-proceedings-in-electricity-theft-case-pending-for-more-than-18-years-legal-research-legal\/","url_meta":{"origin":331060,"position":4},"title":"\u201cFundamental Right to Speedy Trial has been violated\u201d: Allahabad High Court quashes criminal proceedings in electricity theft case, pending for more than 18 years","author":"Editor","date":"January 25, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Right of speedy trial is a fundamental right, and its violation causes prejudice even to the accused person","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Allahabad High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image31.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":334510,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/06\/raj-hc-quashes-grievous-hurt-charge-in-altercation-at-eklingji-temple-allows-trial-for-remaining-offenses-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":331060,"position":5},"title":"Rajasthan High Court quashes Grievous Hurt charge against temple security in altercation at Eklingji Temple; allows trial for remaining offenses","author":"Ritu","date":"November 6, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cWhether or not allegations leveled by the complainant are false or not is a matter of trial and shall be decided by the competent trial Court upon filing of the charge sheet which is proposed as per the factual report.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Rajasthan High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/331060","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67514"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=331060"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/331060\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/314824"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=331060"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=331060"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=331060"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}