{"id":330560,"date":"2024-09-11T11:00:39","date_gmt":"2024-09-11T05:30:39","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=330560"},"modified":"2024-09-18T11:18:08","modified_gmt":"2024-09-18T05:48:08","slug":"mp-municipalities-ordinance-amending-period-to-move-no-confidence-motion-against-municipal-council-head-has-retroactive-operation-mp-high-court-scc-times","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/11\/mp-municipalities-ordinance-amending-period-to-move-no-confidence-motion-against-municipal-council-head-has-retroactive-operation-mp-high-court-scc-times\/","title":{"rendered":"MP Municipalities Ordinance amending \u2018period to move no-confidence motion against Municipal Council Head\u2019 has retroactive operation: MP High Court"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Madhya Pradesh High Court:<\/span> In a writ petition challenging an order dated 23-8-2024 issued by the Collector and Add. Collector, Damoh, fixing the meeting to consider the no-confidence motion against the petitioner, the President of the Municipal Council, Damoh, a single-judge bench of G.S. Ahluwalia, J., quashed the impugned order and held that the Madhya Pradesh Municipalities (Second Amendment) Ordinance, 2024 had retroactive operation and would apply to all cases where the no-confidence motion was moved before the Ordinance&#8217;s promulgation but considered after it.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Factual Matrix<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In the instant matter, the petitioner was serving as the President of the Municipal Council, Damoh, since 05-08-2022. After the completion of two years in office, a no-confidence motion was moved, and the Collector of Damoh, by order dated 23-08-2024, authorised the Additional Collector to convene a meeting to consider the no-confidence motion on 04-09-2024.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The petitioner filed a petition seeking the issuance of a writ of certiorari to quash the impugned order dated 23-08-2024 passed by Respondent 4, in light of a cabinet policy decision dated 20-08-2024 and a similar order passed by the Collector, District-Sagar, on the same date and a writ of mandamus directing Respondent 3 to act in accordance with the cabinet policy and the order passed by the Collector, District-Sagar, in a similar case.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Meanwhile, during the pendency of the petition, the Madhya Pradesh Government promulgated &#8220;The Madhya Pradesh Municipalities (Second Amendment) Ordinance, 2024&#8221;, which amended Section 42-A(1)(a) and Section 43-A of the Madhya Pradesh Municipalities Act, thereby, increasing the immunity period for a municipal president from two years to three years.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Parties&#8217; Contentions<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The petitioner argued that the amended ordinance, extending the period from two to three years, should be treated as retrospective or retroactive in nature, not merely prospective. It was contended that in other districts, similar no-confidence motions were dropped by Collectors on the grounds that the ordinance applied retrospectively, and the petitioner should receive the same treatment. The petitioner relied on <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Ramesh Kumar Soni<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">State of M.P.<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/ouOj4p2Y\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(2013) 14 SCC 696<\/a>; <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Hitendra Vishnu Thakur<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">State of Maharashtra<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/w2wsv3r0\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(1994) 4 SCC 602<\/a> and <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">SEBI<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Classic Credit Ltd.<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/O9N16XGQ\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(2018) 13 SCC 1<\/a>, to support the retroactive application of the ordinance, including:<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">However, the respondents opposed the petition and asserted that just because other Collectors had dropped similar motions, it did not entitle the petitioner to the same outcome. It was contended that the ordinance should be treated as prospective in nature since it introduced a new substantive right (extending the tenure from two years to three years), which cannot be applied retroactively unless explicitly stated. It was argued that the principle of &#8220;negative equality&#8221; should not apply, and the Ordinance is prospective unless explicitly stated otherwise. It was further contended that the right to move a no-confidence motion is a statutory right for the Councilors once the statutory period is over. The respondents cited <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Harla<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">State of Rajasthan<\/span>, (1951) AIR SC 467 and <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Rajendra Agricultural University<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Ashok Kumar Prasad<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/1zZ1EV1q\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(2010) 1 SCC 730<\/a>, and argued that statutory rights are not vested rights and can be modified or taken away by legislation, including:<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Moot Point<\/p>\n<ol style=\"list-style-type: decimal;\">\n<li>\n<p>Whether &#8220;the Madhya Pradesh Municipalities (Second Amendment) Ordinance, 2024&#8221; is prospective, retrospective, or retroactive in nature?<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p>Whether the right to contest an election is a statutory right or a substantive right?<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Whether the performance of an elected President of a Municipal Council is a relevant consideration for a no-confidence motion.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Court&#8217;s Analysis<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold; text-decoration: underline;\">Right to Election &#8211; Statutory Right or Vested Right?<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court discussed the nature of statutory rights and whether the right to contest an election and hold a position is a statutory or substantive right. The Court noted that <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">&#8220;a Statutory Right is a right which is created by a Statute, which can be taken away, created etc. by the Statute, whereas the Substantive Right are rights that are inherent and Fundamental.&#8221;<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court held that the right to contest, elect, and hold an office is purely a statutory right, not a fundamental or vested right. The Court held that <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">&#8220;such a right can always be created or taken away. In the other words, the Right to contest election is always regulated by Statute.&#8221;<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold; text-decoration: underline;\">Ordinance 2024&#8217;s nature &#8211; Prospective v. Retrospective<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court examined whether the Ordinance is procedural or substantive. The Court stated that the Ordinance merely extends the period for bringing a no-confidence motion and does not create new rights but modifies existing procedural norms. The Court noted that <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">&#8220;unless expressed otherwise, all amendments in Procedural Laws would be retrospective in nature and all amendments in Substantive Laws would be Prospective in nature.&#8221;<\/span> The Court referred to several precedents and asserted that the procedural amendments are generally retrospective unless explicitly stated otherwise.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court further asserted that when the right to hold an elected office is merely a statutory right, then the law regulating election, working and tenure of such elected office, would be a procedural law and therefore, any amendment in procedural law has to be treated as retrospective in operation, unless it is otherwise provided in the Ordinance or Amendment Act. The Court further noted <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">that &#8220;there is nothing to indicate that the Ordinance has been given prospective effect.&#8221;<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold; text-decoration: underline;\">Relevancy of President&#8217;s performance to No-confidence motion<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court rejected the respondents&#8217; argument that the performance of the elected President is relevant to the no-confidence motion. The Court stated that the elected President holds office based on the confidence of three-fourths of the elected Councilors present and voting in the no-confidence meeting, therefore, the quality of the President&#8217;s performance is not a prerequisite for moving a no-confidence motion. Instead, the State Government has specific provisions under Section 41-A of the M.P. Municipalities Act to remove an inefficient President if it is deemed in the interest of the Council or the general public.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold; text-decoration: underline;\">Ordinance&#8217;s Applicability<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court stated that since the Ordinance has a retroactive operation, therefore the Ordinance applies to cases where the no-confidence motion was moved before the Ordinance&#8217;s promulgation but considered after it. The Court held that that the Madhya Pradesh Municipalities (Second Amendment) Ordinance, 2024 have retroactive operation and would apply to the ongoing proceeding which was initiated under Section 43-A of Municipalities Act, by moving a motion of no-confidence against the President, Municipal Council, Damoh.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Court&#8217;s Decision<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court allowed the petition based on the finding that the Ordinance should be applied retroactively in the present matter and quashed the impugned order issued by the Collector and Additional Collector of Damoh, which had scheduled the meeting to consider the no-confidence motion on 04-09-2024<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Manju Rai<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">State of M.P.<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/26497zhr\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2024 SCC OnLine MP 5517<\/a>, Decided on 06-09-2024<\/span>]<\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">Shri Vivek Krishna Tankha, Senior Advocate with Shri Harshit Bari, Counsel for the Petitioner<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">Shri Prashant Singh, Advocate General with Shri Amit Seth, Additional Advocate General, Counsel for the Respondent No. 1 to 4\/State<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">The Court criticised the state of uncertainty among various officers due to inconsistent application of the Ordinance and suggested that the State Government should have provided clarity.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67514,"featured_media":317738,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[61228,7201,72987,72983,72982,33416,3040,72986,72984,72985],"class_list":["post-330560","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-justice-g-s-ahluwalia","tag-madhya-pradesh-high-court","tag-madhya-pradesh-municipalities-second-amendment-ordinance","tag-municipal-council-head","tag-municipal-council-president","tag-no-confidence-motion","tag-Ordinance","tag-prospective-operation","tag-retroactive-operation","tag-right-to-election"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>MP Municipalities Ordinance amending \u2018period to move no-confidence motion against Municipal Council Head\u2019 has retroactive operation: MP High Court | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"MP High Court held that MP Municipalities Ordinance which amended the \u2018period to move no-confidence motion against Municipal Council Head\u2019 has retroactive operation.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/11\/mp-municipalities-ordinance-amending-period-to-move-no-confidence-motion-against-municipal-council-head-has-retroactive-operation-mp-high-court-scc-times\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"MP Municipalities Ordinance amending \u2018period to move no-confidence motion against Municipal Council Head\u2019 has retroactive operation: MP High Court\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"MP High Court held that MP Municipalities Ordinance which amended the \u2018period to move no-confidence motion against Municipal Council Head\u2019 has retroactive operation.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/11\/mp-municipalities-ordinance-amending-period-to-move-no-confidence-motion-against-municipal-council-head-has-retroactive-operation-mp-high-court-scc-times\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-09-11T05:30:39+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-09-18T05:48:08+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"591\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"MP Municipalities Ordinance amending \u2018period to move no-confidence motion against Municipal Council Head\u2019 has retroactive operation: MP High Court\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/11\/mp-municipalities-ordinance-amending-period-to-move-no-confidence-motion-against-municipal-council-head-has-retroactive-operation-mp-high-court-scc-times\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/11\/mp-municipalities-ordinance-amending-period-to-move-no-confidence-motion-against-municipal-council-head-has-retroactive-operation-mp-high-court-scc-times\/\",\"name\":\"MP Municipalities Ordinance amending \u2018period to move no-confidence motion against Municipal Council Head\u2019 has retroactive operation: MP High Court | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/11\/mp-municipalities-ordinance-amending-period-to-move-no-confidence-motion-against-municipal-council-head-has-retroactive-operation-mp-high-court-scc-times\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/11\/mp-municipalities-ordinance-amending-period-to-move-no-confidence-motion-against-municipal-council-head-has-retroactive-operation-mp-high-court-scc-times\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-09-11T05:30:39+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-09-18T05:48:08+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\"},\"description\":\"MP High Court held that MP Municipalities Ordinance which amended the \u2018period to move no-confidence motion against Municipal Council Head\u2019 has retroactive operation.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/11\/mp-municipalities-ordinance-amending-period-to-move-no-confidence-motion-against-municipal-council-head-has-retroactive-operation-mp-high-court-scc-times\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/11\/mp-municipalities-ordinance-amending-period-to-move-no-confidence-motion-against-municipal-council-head-has-retroactive-operation-mp-high-court-scc-times\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/11\/mp-municipalities-ordinance-amending-period-to-move-no-confidence-motion-against-municipal-council-head-has-retroactive-operation-mp-high-court-scc-times\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp\",\"width\":887,\"height\":591,\"caption\":\"Madhya Pradesh High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/11\/mp-municipalities-ordinance-amending-period-to-move-no-confidence-motion-against-municipal-council-head-has-retroactive-operation-mp-high-court-scc-times\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"MP Municipalities Ordinance amending \u2018period to move no-confidence motion against Municipal Council Head\u2019 has retroactive operation: MP High Court\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\",\"name\":\"Ritu\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Ritu\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_7\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"MP Municipalities Ordinance amending \u2018period to move no-confidence motion against Municipal Council Head\u2019 has retroactive operation: MP High Court | SCC Times","description":"MP High Court held that MP Municipalities Ordinance which amended the \u2018period to move no-confidence motion against Municipal Council Head\u2019 has retroactive operation.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/11\/mp-municipalities-ordinance-amending-period-to-move-no-confidence-motion-against-municipal-council-head-has-retroactive-operation-mp-high-court-scc-times\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"MP Municipalities Ordinance amending \u2018period to move no-confidence motion against Municipal Council Head\u2019 has retroactive operation: MP High Court","og_description":"MP High Court held that MP Municipalities Ordinance which amended the \u2018period to move no-confidence motion against Municipal Council Head\u2019 has retroactive operation.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/11\/mp-municipalities-ordinance-amending-period-to-move-no-confidence-motion-against-municipal-council-head-has-retroactive-operation-mp-high-court-scc-times\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2024-09-11T05:30:39+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-09-18T05:48:08+00:00","og_image":[{"width":887,"height":591,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Ritu","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"MP Municipalities Ordinance amending \u2018period to move no-confidence motion against Municipal Council Head\u2019 has retroactive operation: MP High Court","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Ritu","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/11\/mp-municipalities-ordinance-amending-period-to-move-no-confidence-motion-against-municipal-council-head-has-retroactive-operation-mp-high-court-scc-times\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/11\/mp-municipalities-ordinance-amending-period-to-move-no-confidence-motion-against-municipal-council-head-has-retroactive-operation-mp-high-court-scc-times\/","name":"MP Municipalities Ordinance amending \u2018period to move no-confidence motion against Municipal Council Head\u2019 has retroactive operation: MP High Court | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/11\/mp-municipalities-ordinance-amending-period-to-move-no-confidence-motion-against-municipal-council-head-has-retroactive-operation-mp-high-court-scc-times\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/11\/mp-municipalities-ordinance-amending-period-to-move-no-confidence-motion-against-municipal-council-head-has-retroactive-operation-mp-high-court-scc-times\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp","datePublished":"2024-09-11T05:30:39+00:00","dateModified":"2024-09-18T05:48:08+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9"},"description":"MP High Court held that MP Municipalities Ordinance which amended the \u2018period to move no-confidence motion against Municipal Council Head\u2019 has retroactive operation.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/11\/mp-municipalities-ordinance-amending-period-to-move-no-confidence-motion-against-municipal-council-head-has-retroactive-operation-mp-high-court-scc-times\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/11\/mp-municipalities-ordinance-amending-period-to-move-no-confidence-motion-against-municipal-council-head-has-retroactive-operation-mp-high-court-scc-times\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/11\/mp-municipalities-ordinance-amending-period-to-move-no-confidence-motion-against-municipal-council-head-has-retroactive-operation-mp-high-court-scc-times\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp","width":887,"height":591,"caption":"Madhya Pradesh High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/11\/mp-municipalities-ordinance-amending-period-to-move-no-confidence-motion-against-municipal-council-head-has-retroactive-operation-mp-high-court-scc-times\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"MP Municipalities Ordinance amending \u2018period to move no-confidence motion against Municipal Council Head\u2019 has retroactive operation: MP High Court"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9","name":"Ritu","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Ritu"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_7\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":231800,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/04\/the-pillarless-financial-ordinance-in-madhya-pradesh-a-constitutional-anathema\/","url_meta":{"origin":330560,"position":0},"title":"The Pillarless Financial Ordinance in Madhya Pradesh: A Constitutional Anathema\u00a0","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 4, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"by Nikunj Maheswari & Kapil Shrivastava*","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Op Eds&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/federalism.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/federalism.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/federalism.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/federalism.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/federalism.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":204230,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/26\/adverse-affect-on-family-life-no-ground-for-interference-in-order-of-transfer-madhya-pradesh-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":330560,"position":1},"title":"Adverse affect on family life no ground for interference in order of transfer: Madhya Pradesh HC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 26, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Madhya Pradesh High Court: This appeal was filed under Section 2(1) of Madhya Pradesh Uchcha Nyayalaya (Khand Nyay Peeth Ko Appeal) Adhiniyam, 2005 before a 2-Judge Bench comprising of Sanjay Yadav and Vivek Agarwal, JJ., against the order where petitioner, a Revenue Inspector was transferred from Municipal Council, Ashoknagar to\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":326948,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/20\/construction-of-public-utility-premises-near-hanuman-mandir-not-detrimental-to-atmosphere-and-ecological-balance-mp-high-court-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":330560,"position":2},"title":"Construction of public utility premises near Hanuman Mandir not detrimental to temple\u2019s atmosphere and ecological balance: MP High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"July 20, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court stated that the petitioner\u2019s failure to provide sufficient details and his criminal background further undermined his petition","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madhya Pradesh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":319081,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/01\/mp-hc-directs-dgp-to-conduct-inquiry-against-io-and-sho-for-manipulating-case-diary-and-delay-in-investigation-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":330560,"position":3},"title":"\u201cDarker side of picture is yet to come\u201d; Madhya Pradesh High Court directs DGP to conduct inquiry against IO and SHO for mishandling case","author":"Ritu","date":"April 1, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Madhya Pradesh High Court emphasised on the seriousness of the matter, highlighting the need for proper investigation and accountability within the police department.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madhya Pradesh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":323492,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/03\/mnrega-corruption-mp-high-court-issues-notice-to-collector-for-not-taking-action-after-investigation-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":330560,"position":4},"title":"Corruption in MNREGA | MP High Court issues notice to Collector for not taking action after investigation","author":"Ritu","date":"June 3, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Commissioner of the MP Rajya Rojgar Guarantee Commission confirmed the corruption allegations after investigation and submitted a report instructing the Collector to act.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madhya Pradesh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":242112,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/11\/simplified-madhya-pradesh-freedom-of-religion-ordinance-2020\/","url_meta":{"origin":330560,"position":5},"title":"Simplified | Madhya Pradesh Freedom of Religion Ordinance, 2020","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 11, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Governor of Madhya Pradesh promulgates the Madhya Pradesh Freedom of Religion Ordinance, 2020. Purpose of this Ordinance To provide freedom of religion by prohibiting conversion from one religion to another by misrepresentation, allurement, use of threat or force, undue influence, coercion, marriage or any fraudulent means and for the matters\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Legislation Updates&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Legislation Updates","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/legislationupdates\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/Ordinance.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/Ordinance.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/Ordinance.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/Ordinance.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/Ordinance.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/330560","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67514"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=330560"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/330560\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/317738"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=330560"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=330560"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=330560"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}