{"id":330443,"date":"2024-09-10T09:00:24","date_gmt":"2024-09-10T03:30:24","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=330443"},"modified":"2024-09-09T19:11:16","modified_gmt":"2024-09-09T13:41:16","slug":"the-interpretive-divide-an-analysis-of-reproductive-autonomy-in-india-and-the-us","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/10\/the-interpretive-divide-an-analysis-of-reproductive-autonomy-in-india-and-the-us\/","title":{"rendered":"The Interpretive Divide: An Analysis of Reproductive Autonomy in India and the US"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Introduction<\/h4>\n

When borders of a State are drawn up and the legislature regulates the rights of their citizens, a State’s inherent interest on its citizens is created. This interest inevitably extends to the citizens of the State and the prospective life that would fall under the control of the State. Though it is humans reproducing, the freedom of having a choice in that regards, is somewhere always restricted by the political bounds of the State in the name of protecting its interests.1<\/sup><\/a><\/p>\n

The ever-changing views on moral rights and wrongs, especially regarding abortion, makes regulation a debated topic of law. The same text is molded, broken, and sewn again under different lights depending on the political inclination at the time. In this regard, contextualism recognises that the meaning of the statute may evolve over time as the society changes and how the interpretation of the law should be flexible enough to adapt these changes. On the other hand, textualism emphasises the literal meaning of the words in the statute also looking at the meaning of the term at the time of adoption of the statute, rather than the broader meaning it warrants in the present time.<\/p>\n

This paper aims to analyse the use of originalism in the American context which uses history to justify the terms of the Constitution and interpret the same according to their political bias. On the other hand, purposive interpretation is used by the Indian courts to give a wider meaning to the terms used. However, both the interpretative tools lead to a tussle between the interests of the State and that of the pregnant individual, which inevitably forces the Court to balance between the rights and chose which outweighs the other.<\/p>\n

Originalism<\/h4>\n

The case of Dobbs<\/span> v. Jackson<\/span>2<\/sup><\/a> (Dobbs<\/span>) overruled and reversed the findings of Roe<\/span> v. Wade<\/span>3<\/sup><\/a> (Roe<\/span>). The question in either of the cases surrounded the interpretation of the Constitution and whether the Constitution protected a woman’s right to abortion. In Roe case<\/span>4<\/sup><\/a>, the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) held that a person’s decision to have an abortion is constitutionally protected liberty under the due process clause in the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution.5<\/sup><\/a> However, the American Constitution follows the idea of categorical acceptance of rights. The SCOTUS in Dobbs case<\/span>6<\/sup><\/a>, while revisiting the aspect of interpretating liberty, noted that the Court must not look at the rights which Americans should have but rather look at the recognised rights mentioned in the Constitution.7<\/sup><\/a> However, that does not mean that there may not be implied rights. There may be fundamental rights that are not mentioned anywhere in the Constitution but are duly protected by the Constitution as they are deeply rooted in the history and tradition of the country or are implicit in the concept of ordered liberty.8<\/sup><\/a> This clearly highlights the originalist view of interpretation for it looks at the history at the time of ratification of the provision to determine its scope or the drafters understanding at the time of drafting regarding the meaning of the term used.<\/p>\n

Originalism, coined by J. Scalia, is a theory of interpretation that when the meaning expressed by the bare text is insufficient for interpretation or is ambiguous, the Judges look at the historical context of adoption and ratification of the text to interpret its language.9<\/sup><\/a> While the same is purported as a neutral and objective form of interpretation10<\/sup><\/a> and is professed as highly democratic (on the understanding that the legislature holds the competence to change the understanding if they so deem fit without an interference from the judiciary), the same is far from the truth in the present case. Thereby, scholars regard the interpretation in Dobbs case<\/span>11<\/sup><\/a> as a “living constitutionalist decision”.12<\/sup><\/a> Academic originalism would, on one hand, consider original public meaning of the term interpretated.13<\/sup><\/a> Dobbs case<\/span>14<\/sup><\/a>, on the other hand, focused on the historical practice rather than the meaning of the Constitution’s text at the time of ratification.15<\/sup><\/a> There are multiple aspects of history, however, the originalist approach allows the Court to cherry-pick aspects of history which the Court deems fit for their political inclination. In the present case, the SCOTUS looks at the State practice, at the time of the Fourteenth Amendment’s ratification in 1868 and that 28 out of 37 States, had enacted statutes making abortion a crime.16<\/sup><\/a> However, the SCOTUS fails to see that the reason for the Fourteenth Amendment’s institution was to protect bodily integrity.17<\/sup><\/a> Dobbs case<\/span>18<\/sup><\/a> provided no criteria for choosing what constitutes relevant history and tradition, thus, leaving it to the Court’s wisdom.19<\/sup><\/a> Moreover, originalism does not consider the values, aims, and commitments of the Constitution.20<\/sup><\/a> Thus, it is not that originalist is a neutral form of interpretation but rather, allows for a convenient viewing of the history to suit the political requirements at the time.<\/p>\n

In an inherently different basis of ruling, the Supreme Court of India (SC) in X<\/span> v. State (NCT of Delhi)<\/span>21<\/sup><\/a> (X<\/span>) upheld women’s right to safe abortions under the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971<\/a>22<\/sup><\/a> (MTP). The judgment was penned down 2 weeks after the Dobbs<\/span> judgment23<\/sup><\/a> and in a stark contrast, is a welcome step in recognising the reproductive rights of individuals.<\/p>\n

The SC in adopting a purposive approach stated that a statutory text which weighs in significantly on right to life and enhances access to reproductive rights must be given the widest possible interpretation.24<\/sup><\/a> In extending access to safe abortion to all women, irrespective of their marital status, the SC assessed how sourcing right to abortion from the idea of “marriage” would be averse to the mandate of the MTP Act itself. Furthering such an argument, the Court noted how the society and its values have changed and individuals often do not view the idea of pre-marital sex as a taboo. The reliance on society and conditioning in both Dobbs<\/span> case<\/span>25<\/sup><\/a> and X case<\/span>26<\/sup><\/a> depict how an “individual right” is intrinsically linked to values of the society at large. Interestingly, as stated before, when the text of a constitutional mandate is unclear, J. Scalia’s approach to interpretation has been to rely on the long-standing values of the American Society which leaves it on the Judge to choose to define these “values”.27<\/sup><\/a> X case<\/span>28<\/sup><\/a> by using the purposive tool of interpretation, thereby, considered the rights and experiences of women who had to carry a pregnancy against their consent. The SC decided to look at the amended Preamble to cull out the intention of the legislature. The SC noted how the Preamble used the word “partner”, instead of husband and inferred that the legislature intended for the abortion to apply to both married and unmarried women.<\/p>\n

Continuing the usage of purposive interpretation, not only did the SC interpret the definition of women widely, to include unmarried women but also included queer persons. It also gave regard to novel familial relationships in society29<\/sup><\/a> (relying on Deepika<\/span> v. Central Administrative Tribunal<\/span>30<\/sup><\/a>). It further went into the exception under Section 3(b<\/span>)(2) of the MTP Act31<\/sup><\/a>, to broaden the contours of mental health32<\/sup><\/a> of the mother as an exception. Another notable mention by the SC was the recognition of marital rape33<\/sup><\/a> and the need for abortion even if the couple is married. Thereby, the SC gave a much wider scope to the Act.<\/p>\n

Balancing of rights<\/h4>\n

While individuals have rights, the State has powers to ensure that these rights are restricted to function from a nationwide point of view. Thus, courts use the balancing of rights approach in order to harmoniously interpret the rights of individuals with the communal interests.34<\/sup><\/a><\/p>\n

American jurisprudence on balancing<\/h4>\n

The SCOTUS in Roe case<\/span>35<\/sup><\/a> also undertook the balancing of rights of approach and stated that, the State has two constitutionally relevant interests — one, was the State’s interest in protection of health of pregnant persons and second was the State’s interest in the potentiality of human life.36<\/sup><\/a> Roe case<\/span>37<\/sup><\/a> stated that at the early stages of pregnancy, neither of the State’s interest was sufficiently overbearing to justify abortion regulations.38<\/sup><\/a> Hence, the rights of the pregnant person’s to abort outweighed the State’s interest. Before the end of the first trimester, the State’s interest in protecting pregnant person’s health takes over and regulations pertaining to procedure must be allowed.39<\/sup><\/a> The State’s interest in protecting potentiality of human life only overweighs at the stage of fetal viability.40<\/sup><\/a> However, the contention was that the method of balancing of rights works only when one of the right is justifiably overweighing the other.41<\/sup><\/a> Thus, the conclusion adopted by Roe case<\/span>42<\/sup><\/a> was criticised in Dobbs case<\/span>43<\/sup><\/a>, which stated that, no persuasive or even colourable argument was made as to why the time for terminating a pregnancy must extend to viability.44<\/sup><\/a> Roe stated that viability is the point when a child can survive outside the womb.45<\/sup><\/a> In Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania<\/span> v. Casey<\/span>46<\/sup><\/a>, the SCOTUS justified the workability argument that a pregnant person who failed to act before viability has consented to the State’s intervention on behalf of the developing child.47<\/sup><\/a> The same was rejected by Dobbs case<\/span>48<\/sup><\/a> on the grounds that there is no justifiable tipping point which would lead to the change in protection of right.49<\/sup><\/a><\/p>\n

However, the balancing of rights method adopted by Dobbs case<\/span>50<\/sup><\/a> is ex ante, thereby, not truly adopting a balancing of rights approach. In Roe case<\/span>51<\/sup><\/a>, we see that the SCOTUS first, balances the interests of both sides and then determines the constitutionality of the law.52<\/sup><\/a> However, in Dobbs case<\/span>53<\/sup><\/a>, the SCOTUS held that the State’s interest in protecting pre-natal life is so significant and is so compromised by the decision to have an abortion that the State’s interest renders the equality and liberty of pregnant individuals constitutionally irrelevant.54<\/sup><\/a> Thus, the constitutionality of the law was determined first and then the balancing took place to state that owing to the lack of constitutional relevancy, the interests of the pregnant person in aborting is overshadowed. The same renders balancing of rights meaningless because constitutionality would itself become a weight in the analyses which tips the scale to the side of the State.<\/p>\n

Indian jurisprudence on balancing<\/h4>\n

The SC in X case<\/span>55<\/sup><\/a> noted that constitutional principles should be guiding the MTP Act. In the landmark case of K.S. Puttaswamy (Privacy 9-J.)<\/span> v. Union of India (Puttaswamy)<\/span>56<\/sup><\/a>, a mother’s right to procreate or abstain from procreating is recognised as a part of the constitutional right to life and personal liberty as enshrined under Article 2157<\/sup><\/a> of the Constitution of India. The SC further affirmed Suchitra Srivasatava case<\/span>58<\/sup><\/a>, a Delhi High Court judgment which read the right of a woman to undergo termination of pregnancy as a constitutional right.<\/p>\n

While the SC delved into the privacy of pregnant persons, their mental health, novel familial relationships and their constitutional right under Article 21, they did not make the right to abortion an absolute right. However, the progressive ratio of the judgment makes us blind to its realities.<\/p>\n

The author of this essay wants to piece together the conflicts of reading the MTP Act as a purposive legislation giving individuals reproductive autonomy and right to privacy through Puttaswamy case<\/span>59<\/sup><\/a>. However, in the same breath also giving the Registered Medical Practitioners (RMPs) a final say in the matter. The legislation instructs Registered Medical practitioners to decide the matter in good faith.60<\/sup><\/a> Further, it requires abortion to happen only in a government hospital or one mandated by the MTP Act. 61<\/sup><\/a><\/p>\n

As author of this piece, we are cognizant of the fact that any right, including a constitutional right cannot be absolute. Reasonable restrictions are necessary in every right granted to us by the Constitution. We recognise the value pluralism the Court in X case<\/span>62<\/sup><\/a> dealt with while supporting different views on life and liberty to reach a consensus to aligning with the Constitution.<\/p>\n

As the question of law before the Court in X<\/span> case<\/span>63<\/sup><\/a> was limited, we understand how the Court could not delve into the constitutionality of the legislations but widened the ambit of the legislation itself to reach an aesthetic hypothesis.<\/p>\n

While we have given due credit to X case<\/span>64<\/sup><\/a> for its value pluralism, and the attempt they have made at balancing we also understand how inaccessible the law is. Being constrained by legislative exceptions on abortion puts the pregnant persons right to life health in the hands of the State, stripping away of their constitutionally protected autonomy. We concur with Andrew Morisson who noted down how law is a fractal.65<\/sup><\/a> When a law is made it is a general framework for general reasoning. An overburdened law with too many exceptions becomes inaccessible to those who need it the most. Good legal drafting is when an exception is made from the absolute right and not when the right itself becomes an exception to the legislation.<\/p>\n

The SC in X case<\/span>66<\/sup><\/a> itself states that — Sections 314-31667<\/sup><\/a> IPC which criminalises abortion is a mischief legislation and Section 3(2)(b<\/span>)68<\/sup><\/a> of the MTP Act was made to remedy the mischief.69<\/sup><\/a> The Court in this case, instead of making the constitutional right absolute and carving out exceptions from it — made the exception of criminalising abortion the primary legislation. We argue that a constitutional right should never be a remedy to a mischief, rather it should be an inherent right exercisable at the ease of the legal person.<\/p>\n

We believe the presence of RMPs is based on the same patriarchal notions of “State’s interest” that we see in Dobbs case<\/span>70<\/sup><\/a>. The balancing of interests between the legislature and the constitutional right to bodily autonomy as mentioned in Dobbs<\/span> case<\/span>71<\/sup><\/a> is also relied on here. While the opinion in Dobbs case<\/span>72<\/sup><\/a> leans more on one side, X<\/span> attempts to place itself in between and has rather led to a conundrum.<\/p>\n

Therefore, our takeaway from this piece would be the prompt need for the legislature to deliberate the fallacy of the MTP Act in light of the IPC and come up with exercisable legislation decriminalising abortion and making it an inherent right, with exceptions as necessary.<\/p>\n

Conclusion<\/h4>\n

Two questions of law, one regarding constitutional interpretation and the other regarding legislative interpretation, on the same subject-matter penned down across different jurisdictions depicted how the idea of “individual rights”, of pregnant persons are never their own.<\/p>\n

In Dobbs case<\/span>73<\/sup><\/a>, we saw how a sea of change in political situation brought in a change in the law. Unlike in X case<\/span>74<\/sup><\/a>, the SCOTUS did not successfully balance the two perspectives of States interest and reproductive autonomy. While the idea of value pluralism is that we commit to different values at the same time, the SCOTUS’s cherry-picking of history gave primacy to the State’s interest and the originalist perspective.<\/p>\n

Further, in X case<\/span>75<\/sup><\/a>, Justice Chandrachud placed reliance on the landmark cases of Puttaswamy case<\/span>76<\/sup><\/a> and Navtej Johar case<\/span>77<\/sup><\/a>, both also authored by him. We could see through the precedents and the interpretative approach how the personal inclination of the Justice shone through in his analysis. This gets even more fascinating as the Justice would be deciding on the matters of same-sex petition78<\/sup><\/a> and marital rape79<\/sup><\/a> — issues he has deliberated in X case<\/span>80<\/sup><\/a>.<\/p>\n

To conclude, the author of this essay has attempted to analyse both judgments through the same tools of interpretation and realised that seemingly different ratios are based on the same general principles and tools of interpretation. We further recognised how the inclination of Judges has played a role in reaching the ratios of the case.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n\n

*Student, Jindal Global Public School. Author can be reached at: 19jgls-vedika.k@jgu.edu.in<\/a>.<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n

1.<\/a> X<\/span> v. State (NCT of Delhi)<\/span>, (2023) 9 SCC 433.<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n

2.<\/a> 2022 SCC OnLine US SC 9 : 213 L Ed 2d 545 : 142 S Ct 2228, 2317 : 597 US __(2022).<\/a><\/p>\n

3.<\/a> 1973 SCC OnLine US SC 20 : 35 L Ed 2d 147 : 410 US 113 (1973).<\/a><\/p>\n

4.<\/a> Roe case<\/span>, 1973 SCC OnLine US SC 20 : 35 L Ed 2d 147 : 410 US 113 (1973).<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n

5.<\/a> Elizabeth Chloe Romanis, “The End of (Reproductive) Liberty as We Know It: A Note on Dobbs V. Jackson Women’s Health”, Medical L. Int’l. 1, 2 (2022).<\/p>\n

6.<\/a> Dobbs case<\/span>, 2022 SCC OnLine US SC 9 : 213 L Ed 2d 545 : 142 S Ct 2228, 2317 : 597 US __ (2022).<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n

7.<\/a> Dobbs case<\/span><\/a>, 2022 SCC OnLine US SC 9 : 213 L Ed 2d 545 : 142 S Ct 2228, 2317 : 597 US __(2022) <\/a> (Justice Alito’s opinion).<\/span><\/p>\n

8.<\/a> Dobbs case<\/span><\/a>, 2022 SCC OnLine US SC 9 : 213 L Ed 2d 545 : 142 S Ct 2228, 2317 : 597 US __ (2022) <\/a> (Justice Alito’s opinion).<\/span><\/p>\n

9.<\/a> Elizabeth Chloe Romanis, “The End of (Reproductive) Liberty as We Know It: A Note on Dobbs V. Jackson Women’s Health”, Medical L. Int’l. 1, 5 (2022).<\/p>\n

10.<\/a> Elizabeth Chloe Romanis, “The End of (Reproductive) Liberty as We Know It: A Note on Dobbs V. Jackson Women’s Health”, Medical L. Int’l. 1, 5 (2022).<\/p>\n

11.<\/a> Dobbs case<\/span>, 2022 SCC OnLine US SC 9 : 213 L Ed 2d 545 : 142 S Ct 2228, 2317 : 597 US __ (2022).<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n

12.<\/a> Reva B. Siegel, “Memory Games: Dobbs’s Originalism as Anti-Democratic Living Constitutionalism— and Some Pathways for Resistance”, (2023) 101 Texas L. Rev. 1128, 1169.<\/p>\n

13.<\/a> Reva B. Siegel, “Memory Games: Dobbs’s Originalism as Anti-Democratic Living Constitutionalism— and Some Pathways for Resistance”, (2023) 101 Texas L. Rev. 1128, 1169.<\/p>\n

14.<\/a> Dobbs case<\/span>, 2022 SCC OnLine US SC 9 : 213 L Ed 2d 545 : 142 S Ct 2228, 2317 : 597 US __ (2022).<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n

15.<\/a> Reva B. Siegel, “Memory Games: Dobbs’s Originalism as Anti-Democratic Living Constitutionalism— and Some Pathways for Resistance”, (2023) 101 Texas L. Rev. 1128, 1141.<\/p>\n

16.<\/a> Dobbs case<\/span><\/a>, 2022 SCC OnLine US SC 9 : 213 L Ed 2d 545 : 142 S Ct 2228, 2317 : 597 US__ (2022) <\/a> (Justice Alito’s opinion).<\/p>\n

17.<\/a> David H. Gans, “This Court has Revealed Conservative Originalism to be a Hollow Shell”, T<\/span>he A<\/span>tlantic<\/span>.<\/p>\n

18.<\/a> 2022 SCC OnLine US SC 9 : 213 L Ed 2d 545 : 142 S Ct 2228, 2317 : 597 US __ (2022).<\/p>\n

19.<\/a> Reva B. Siegel, “Memory Games: Dobbs’s Originalism as Anti-Democratic Living Constitutionalism— and Some Pathways for Resistance”, (2023) 101 Texas L. Rev. 1128, 1183.<\/p>\n

20.<\/a> Angie Gou, “Cherry-Picked History: Reva Siegel on ‘Living Originalism’ in Dobbs”, SCOTUS Blog.<\/p>\n

21.<\/a> (2023) 9 SCC 433.<\/a><\/p>\n

22.<\/a> Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971.<\/a><\/p>\n

23.<\/a> Dobbs case<\/span>, 2022 SCC OnLine US SC 9 : 213 L Ed 2d 545 : 142 S Ct 2228, 2317 : 597 US __ (2022).<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n

24.<\/a> X case<\/span>, (2023) 9 SCC 433.<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n

25.<\/a> Dobbs case<\/span>, 2022 SCC OnLine US SC 9 : 213 L Ed 2d 545 : 142 S Ct 2228, 2317 : 597 US __ (2022).<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n

26.<\/a> X case<\/span>, (2023) 9 SCC 433, para 59.<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n

27.<\/a> Evans, Michael C., Cynthia L. Cates, and Wayne V. McIntosh. “The Reality of Jurisprudence(?): Interpretive Methods in the Opinions of Justices Antonin Scalia and Stephen Breyer”, (2015) 36 The Justice System J. 20.<\/p>\n

28.<\/a> X case<\/span>, (2023) 9 SCC 433, para 59.<\/a> <\/span><\/p>\n

29.<\/a> X case<\/span>, (2023) 9 SCC 433, para 44.<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n

30.<\/a> 2022 SCC OnLine SC 1088.<\/a><\/p>\n

31.<\/a> Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971, S. 3(2)(b<\/span>).<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n

32.<\/a> X case<\/span>, (2023) 9 SCC 433, para 111.<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n

33.<\/a> X case<\/span>, (2023) 9 SCC 433, para 77.<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n

34.<\/a> Bas\u0327ak C\u0327al\u0131, “Balancing Human Rights? Methodological Problems with Weights, Scales and Proportions”, (2007) 29 Hum. Rts. Q. 251, 254.<\/p>\n

35.<\/a> 2022 SCC OnLine US SC 9 : 213 L Ed 2d 545 : 142 S Ct 2228, 2317 : 597 US __ (2022).<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n

36.<\/a> Carlos A. Ball, “Balancing Abortion”, (2023) 63 Santa Clara L. Rev. 2, 8.<\/p>\n

37.<\/a> Roe case<\/span>, 2022 SCC OnLine US SC 9 : 213 L Ed 2d 545 : 142 S Ct 2228, 2317 : 597 US __ (2022).<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n

38.<\/a> Carlos A. Ball, “Balancing Abortion”, (2023) 63 Santa Clara L. Rev. 2, 8.<\/p>\n

39.<\/a> Carlos A. Ball, “Balancing Abortion,” (2023) 63 Santa Clara L. Rev. 2, 8.<\/p>\n

40.<\/a> Carlos A. Ball, “Balancing Abortion”, (2023) 63 Santa Clara L. Rev. 2, 8.<\/p>\n

41.<\/a> Dobbs case, 2022 SCC OnLine US SC 9 : 213 L Ed 2d 545 : 142 S Ct 2228, 2317 : 597 US __ (2022).<\/span><\/a> (Justice Alito’s opinion).<\/p>\n

42.<\/a> Roe case, 1973 SCC OnLine US SC 20 : 35 L Ed 2d 147 : 410 US 113 (1973).<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n

43.<\/a> Dobbs case<\/span>, 2022 SCC OnLine US SC 9 : 213 L Ed 2d 545 : 142 S Ct 2228, 2317 : 597 US __ (2022).<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n

44.<\/a> Dobbs case<\/span>, 2022 SCC OnLine US SC 9 : 213 L Ed 2d 545 : 142 S Ct 2228, 2317 : 597 US __ (2022)<\/span> <\/a> (Chief Justice Robert’s concurring opinion).<\/p>\n

45.<\/a> Dobbs case<\/span>, 2022 SCC OnLine US SC 9 : 213 L Ed 2d 545 : 142 S Ct 2228, 2317 : 597 US __ (2022)<\/span> <\/a> (Chief Justice Robert’s concurring opinion).<\/p>\n

46.<\/a> 1992 SCC OnLine US SC 102 : 505 US 833 (1992).<\/a><\/p>\n

47.<\/a> Casey case<\/span>, 1992 SCC OnLine US SC 102 : 505 US 833, 870 (1992).<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n

48.<\/a> Dobbs case<\/span>, 2022 SCC OnLine US SC 9 : 213 L Ed 2d 545 : 142 S Ct 2228, 2317 : 597 US __ (2022).<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n

49.<\/a> Dobbs case<\/span>, 2022 SCC OnLine US SC 9 : 213 L Ed 2d 545 : 142 S Ct 2228, 2317 : 597 US __ (2022)<\/span> <\/a> (Chief Justice Robert’s concurring opinion).<\/p>\n

50.<\/a> Dobbs case<\/span>, 2022 SCC OnLine US SC 9 : 213 L Ed 2d 545 : 142 S Ct 2228, 2317 : 597 US __ (2022).<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n

51.<\/a> Roe case<\/span>, 1973 SCC OnLine US SC 20 : 35 L Ed 2d 147 : 410 US 113 (1973).<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n

52.<\/a> Carlos A. Ball, “Balancing Abortion”, (2023) 63 Santa Clara L. Rev. 2, 48.<\/p>\n

53.<\/a> Dobbs case<\/span>, 2022 SCC OnLine US SC 9 : 213 L Ed 2d 545 : 142 S Ct 2228, 2317 : 597 US __ (2022).<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n

54.<\/a> Carlos A. Ball, “Balancing Abortion”, (2023) 63 Santa Clara L. Rev. 2, 49.<\/p>\n

55.<\/a> X case<\/span>, (2023) 9 SCC 433, para 104.<\/span><\/a> <\/p>\n

56.<\/a> (2017) 10 SCC 1, para 298.<\/a><\/p>\n

57.<\/a> Constitution of India, Art. 21.<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n

58.<\/a> Suchita Srivastava<\/span> v. Chandigarh<\/span> Admn.<\/span>, (2009) 9 SCC 1.<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n

59.<\/a> (2017) 10 SCC 1.<\/a><\/p>\n

60.<\/a> X case<\/span><\/a>, (2023) 9 SCC 433, para 17<\/a>; Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971, Ss. 4,. 3(2)<\/a><\/span> along with Medical<\/span> Termination of<\/span> Pregnancy Act, 1971, S. 5-A<\/span><\/span><\/a>.<\/span><\/p>\n

61.<\/a> Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971 S. 4(<\/span>a<\/span>).<\/span><\/span><\/a><\/p>\n

62.<\/a> X case<\/span>, (2023) 9 SCC 433.<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n

63.<\/a> X case<\/span>, (2023) 9 SCC 433.<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n

64.<\/a> X case<\/span><\/span>, (2023) 9 SCC 433.<\/span><\/span><\/a><\/p>\n

65.<\/a> Andrew Morisson Stumpff, “The Law is a Fractal: The Attempt to Anticipate Everything”, (2013) 44 L<\/span>oyola U<\/span>niversity C<\/span>hicago LJ.<\/span><\/p>\n

66.<\/a> X case<\/span>, (2023) 9 SCC 433.<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n

67.<\/a> Penal Code, 1860, Ss. 314-316.<\/a><\/p>\n

68.<\/a> Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971, S. 3(2)(b<\/span>).<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n

69.<\/a> X case<\/span>, (2023) 9 SCC 433, para 71.<\/span><\/span><\/a> <\/span><\/p>\n

70.<\/a> Dobbs case<\/span>, 2022 SCC OnLine US SC 9 : 213 L Ed 2d 545 : 142 S Ct 2228, 2317 : 597 US __ (2022).<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n

71.<\/a> Dobbs case<\/span>, 2022 SCC OnLine US SC 9 : 213 L Ed 2d 545 : 142 S Ct 2228, 2317 : 597 US __ (2022).<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n

72.<\/a> Dobbs case<\/span>, 2022 SCC OnLine US SC 9 : 213 L Ed 2d 545 : 142 S Ct 2228, 2317 : 597 US __ (2022).<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n

73.<\/a> Dobbs case<\/span>, 2022 SCC OnLine US SC 9 : 213 L Ed 2d 545 : 142 S Ct 2228, 2317 : 597 US __ (2022).<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n

74.<\/a> X case<\/span>, (2023) 9 SCC 433.<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n

75.<\/a> X case<\/span>, (2023) 9 SCC 433.<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n

76.<\/a> (2017) 10 SCC 1.<\/a><\/p>\n

77.<\/a> Navtej Singh Johar<\/span> v. Union of India<\/span>, (2018) 10 SCC 1.<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n

78.<\/a> Khadija Khan, “SC Same-Sex Marriage Hearing Highlights: Petitioners Argue ‘Straight Couples Who Can’t Procreate are Allowed to Marry, So Why Not Us’ ”, T<\/span>he I<\/span>ndian E<\/span>xpress<\/span>. <\/p>\n

79.<\/a> Hrishikesh Sahoo<\/span> v. State of Karnataka<\/span>, SLP (Crl.) 4063-4064 of 2022, order dated 13-8-2024 (SC).<\/p>\n

80.<\/a> X case<\/span>, (2023) 9 SCC 433.<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

by Vedika Kakar*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":330454,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[42503,1191],"tags":[72940,19471,72938,34279,72939,30014],"class_list":["post-330443","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-legal-analysis","category-op-ed","tag-american","tag-constitution","tag-interpretive-divide","tag-medical-termination-of-pregnancy-act-1971","tag-reproductive-autonomy-in-india","tag-scotus"],"yoast_head":"\nThe Interpretive Divide: An Analysis of Reproductive Autonomy in India and the US | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"When borders of a State are drawn up and the legislature regulates the rights of their citizens, a State\u2019s inherent interest\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/10\/the-interpretive-divide-an-analysis-of-reproductive-autonomy-in-india-and-the-us\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"The Interpretive Divide: An Analysis of Reproductive Autonomy in India and the US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"When borders of a State are drawn up and the legislature regulates the rights of their citizens, a State\u2019s inherent interest\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/10\/the-interpretive-divide-an-analysis-of-reproductive-autonomy-in-india-and-the-us\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-09-10T03:30:24+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/Analysis-of-Reproductive-Autonomy.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"The Interpretive Divide: An Analysis of Reproductive Autonomy in India and the US\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"18 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/10\/the-interpretive-divide-an-analysis-of-reproductive-autonomy-in-india-and-the-us\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/10\/the-interpretive-divide-an-analysis-of-reproductive-autonomy-in-india-and-the-us\/\",\"name\":\"The Interpretive Divide: An Analysis of Reproductive Autonomy in India and the US | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/10\/the-interpretive-divide-an-analysis-of-reproductive-autonomy-in-india-and-the-us\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/10\/the-interpretive-divide-an-analysis-of-reproductive-autonomy-in-india-and-the-us\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/Analysis-of-Reproductive-Autonomy.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-09-10T03:30:24+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"description\":\"When borders of a State are drawn up and the legislature regulates the rights of their citizens, a State\u2019s inherent interest\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/10\/the-interpretive-divide-an-analysis-of-reproductive-autonomy-in-india-and-the-us\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/10\/the-interpretive-divide-an-analysis-of-reproductive-autonomy-in-india-and-the-us\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/10\/the-interpretive-divide-an-analysis-of-reproductive-autonomy-in-india-and-the-us\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/Analysis-of-Reproductive-Autonomy.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/Analysis-of-Reproductive-Autonomy.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"Analysis of Reproductive Autonomy\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/10\/the-interpretive-divide-an-analysis-of-reproductive-autonomy-in-india-and-the-us\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"The Interpretive Divide: An Analysis of Reproductive Autonomy in India and the US\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"The Interpretive Divide: An Analysis of Reproductive Autonomy in India and the US | SCC Times","description":"When borders of a State are drawn up and the legislature regulates the rights of their citizens, a State\u2019s inherent interest","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/10\/the-interpretive-divide-an-analysis-of-reproductive-autonomy-in-india-and-the-us\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"The Interpretive Divide: An Analysis of Reproductive Autonomy in India and the US","og_description":"When borders of a State are drawn up and the legislature regulates the rights of their citizens, a State\u2019s inherent interest","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/10\/the-interpretive-divide-an-analysis-of-reproductive-autonomy-in-india-and-the-us\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2024-09-10T03:30:24+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/Analysis-of-Reproductive-Autonomy.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"The Interpretive Divide: An Analysis of Reproductive Autonomy in India and the US","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"18 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/10\/the-interpretive-divide-an-analysis-of-reproductive-autonomy-in-india-and-the-us\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/10\/the-interpretive-divide-an-analysis-of-reproductive-autonomy-in-india-and-the-us\/","name":"The Interpretive Divide: An Analysis of Reproductive Autonomy in India and the US | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/10\/the-interpretive-divide-an-analysis-of-reproductive-autonomy-in-india-and-the-us\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/10\/the-interpretive-divide-an-analysis-of-reproductive-autonomy-in-india-and-the-us\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/Analysis-of-Reproductive-Autonomy.webp","datePublished":"2024-09-10T03:30:24+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"description":"When borders of a State are drawn up and the legislature regulates the rights of their citizens, a State\u2019s inherent interest","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/10\/the-interpretive-divide-an-analysis-of-reproductive-autonomy-in-india-and-the-us\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/10\/the-interpretive-divide-an-analysis-of-reproductive-autonomy-in-india-and-the-us\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/10\/the-interpretive-divide-an-analysis-of-reproductive-autonomy-in-india-and-the-us\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/Analysis-of-Reproductive-Autonomy.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/Analysis-of-Reproductive-Autonomy.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"Analysis of Reproductive Autonomy"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/10\/the-interpretive-divide-an-analysis-of-reproductive-autonomy-in-india-and-the-us\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"The Interpretive Divide: An Analysis of Reproductive Autonomy in India and the US"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/Analysis-of-Reproductive-Autonomy.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":194473,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/04\/10\/the-emerging-laws-relating-surrogacy-a-procreational-right-for-single-parent-transgenders-and-foreigners\/","url_meta":{"origin":330443,"position":0},"title":"The emerging laws relating Surrogacy: A procreational right for Single Parent, Transgenders and Foreigners","author":"Saba","date":"April 10, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"by Aparajita Amar and Arjun Aggarwal","rel":"","context":"In "Op Eds"","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/08\/surrogacy.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/08\/surrogacy.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/08\/surrogacy.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/08\/surrogacy.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/08\/surrogacy.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":349100,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/30\/mp-high-court-upholds-minor-sexual-assault-survivors-right-to-continue-pregnancy-directs-for-comprehensive-state-support-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":330443,"position":1},"title":"Medical Termination of Pregnancy | MP High Court upholds minor sexual assault survivor\u2019s right to continue Pregnancy; directs for comprehensive State support","author":"Ritu","date":"May 30, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe right of personal liberty guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution of India has held that unmarried woman has right to decide in respect of the pregnancy.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madhya Pradesh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":367823,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/26\/constitution-day-2025-citizen-empowerment-through-constitution\/","url_meta":{"origin":330443,"position":2},"title":"Constitution Day 2025: Tribute to a Living Document empowering the Citizen","author":"Shubhi","date":"November 26, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"This Constitution Day, it\u2019s time to reflect on how the Constitution has laid the groundwork for citizen empowerment through rights, judicial activism, digital governance, social justice, and participatory democracy.","rel":"","context":"In "Op Eds"","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/blog-2025-11-26T184258.464.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/blog-2025-11-26T184258.464.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/blog-2025-11-26T184258.464.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/blog-2025-11-26T184258.464.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":370524,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/22\/mad-hc-state-constitutional-duty-legal-aid-indian-citizens-working-abroad-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":330443,"position":3},"title":"State has Constitutional Duty to provide legal aid to Indian citizens working abroad: Madras High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"December 22, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cOverseas employment is a reality\u2026 When the Government is receiving benefit from the migrant workers, it has a correlative and corresponding duty to rush to their rescue when issues arise out of such overseas employment.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"legal aid Indian Citizens working abroad","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/legal-aid-Indian-Citizens-working-abroad.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/legal-aid-Indian-Citizens-working-abroad.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/legal-aid-Indian-Citizens-working-abroad.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/legal-aid-Indian-Citizens-working-abroad.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":340302,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/03\/fundamental-right-of-queer-couples-to-enter-into-civil-union-contracts-in-india\/","url_meta":{"origin":330443,"position":4},"title":"Fundamental Right of Queer Couples to Enter into Civil Union Contracts in India","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"February 3, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"by Devadipta Das* and Shradha Pandey**","rel":"","context":"In "Op Eds"","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Civil Union Contracts in India","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/Civil-Union-Contracts-in-India.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/Civil-Union-Contracts-in-India.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/Civil-Union-Contracts-in-India.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/Civil-Union-Contracts-in-India.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":375438,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/11\/bombay-hc-abortion-rights-extended-to-unmarried-women-up-to-24-weeks\/","url_meta":{"origin":330443,"position":5},"title":"Abortion rights extended to unmarried women up to 24 weeks: Bombay HC directs wide of circulation of Supreme Court ruling across State authorities","author":"Soumya Yadav","date":"February 11, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe woman is in unique and often difficult circumstances with respect to her physical, mental, social, or financial state, and all the different categories of women seek an abortion after twenty weeks either due to delay in recognizing the pregnancy or because of some other change in their environment.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Abortion rights unmarried women","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Abortion-rights-unmarried-women.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Abortion-rights-unmarried-women.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Abortion-rights-unmarried-women.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Abortion-rights-unmarried-women.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/330443","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=330443"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/330443\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/330454"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=330443"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=330443"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=330443"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}