{"id":330313,"date":"2024-09-09T09:00:30","date_gmt":"2024-09-09T03:30:30","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=330313"},"modified":"2024-09-12T11:01:10","modified_gmt":"2024-09-12T05:31:10","slug":"posh-sub-inspectors-transfer-merely-on-account-of-pendency-of-internal-committee-unjustified-mp-high-court-scc-times","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/09\/posh-sub-inspectors-transfer-merely-on-account-of-pendency-of-internal-committee-unjustified-mp-high-court-scc-times\/","title":{"rendered":"POSH| Sub-Inspector\u2019s transfer, merely on account of pendency of Internal Committee proceedings, unjustified: MP High Court"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Madhya Pradesh High Court:<\/span> In a petition challenging the transfer order on the grounds that the impugned transfer appeared to be a penalty due to the ongoing sexual harassment proceedings rather than an administrative necessity, a single-judge bench of Vivek Jain, J., held that the transfer amounted to undue victimisation and harassment of the petitioner as it was not based on any administrative necessity or formal recommendation from the Internal Complaint Committee (ICC) but was based on pendency of the Internal Committee proceedings and quashed the transfer order.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In the instant matter, the petitioner, a Sub-Inspector (Ministerial) in the VI<span style=\"vertical-align: super;\">th<\/span> Battalion SAF, Jabalpur, was transferred to the Office of Superintendent of Police, Maihar by an order dated 01-07-2024, based on a recommendation made due to allegations of harassment between the petitioner and a female Head Constable (the intervenor). The petitioner was given a clean chit in two prior inquiries (12-03-2024 and 10-06-2024), and he claimed that his transfer was a form of penalty. The intervenor alleged sexual harassment and initiated proceedings under the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition, and Redressal) Act, 2013 (POSH Act). She also expressed distrust in the ICC investigating the matter and requested the petitioner&#8217;s transfer, citing a provision under Section 12 of the POSH Act.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The petitioner contended that the transfer was punitive, not based on administrative grounds, and came despite him being cleared in earlier inquiries. The petitioner argued that the ICC&#8217;s proceedings were stalled due to the intervenor&#8217;s non-cooperation and that his transfer was unjustified. However, the Intervenor argued that the transfer was necessary under Section 12 of the POSH Act to ensure a conducive work environment and to facilitate the inquiry. The intervenor also expressed a lack of trust in the ICC and any local committee.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court noted that Section 12 of the POSH Act allows transfers only upon the ICC&#8217;s recommendation, which was absent in the present case. The Court noted that the transfer recommendation came from the Commandant of the VI<span style=\"vertical-align: super;\">th<\/span> Battalion, not the ICC, thereby making the transfer unjustified under the POSH Act. The Court further noted that the ICC proceedings had stalled due to the intervenor&#8217;s refusal to cooperate and her expression of mistrust in the committee, without specific reasons or grounds, further exacerbated the situation.<\/p>\n<p style=\"\">The Court held that the petitioner&#8217;s transfer was not based on administrative exigency but rather on the pendency of the POSH Act inquiry, which had reached a standstill due to the intervenor&#8217;s conduct.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%; margin-left: 36pt; font-weight: bold;\">&#8220;&#8230;the transfer of the petitioner merely on account of pendency of the Internal Committee proceedings is not justified in absence of any recommendation of the committee, and the committee proceedings having been brought to an indefinite stalemate by the intervenor herself.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court held that impugned transfer amounts to <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">&#8220;nothing but undue victimisation and harassment of the petitioner&#8221;<\/span> and quashed the transfer order dated 01-07-2024. The Court granted the respondents the liberty to transfer or attach the petitioner to any other office within Jabalpur, ensuring that a cordial work atmosphere is maintained without causing undue disturbance to the petitioner.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Shankarlal Namdeo<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">State of M.P.<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/Y0BnVdgE\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2024 SCC OnLine MP 5512<\/a>, Decided on 03-09-2024<\/span>]<\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">Shri Brijesh Kumar Choubey, Counsel for the Petitioner<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">Shri Monu V. John, Counsel for the Respondent<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">Shri Sanjay Ram Tamrakar, Senior Advocate with Shri Ankit Chopra, Counsel for the Intervenor<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">&#8220;The intervenor created an impossible situation of stalemate in herself, bringing the proceedings of the ICC to a standstill and demanding reconstitution of committee which is not contemplated under the POSH Act.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67514,"featured_media":317738,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[38970,4251,72907,71642,7201,72909,43269,46464,72908,31729,38455],"class_list":["post-330313","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-administrative-exigency","tag-icc","tag-internal-complaint-committee","tag-justice-vivek-jain","tag-madhya-pradesh-high-court","tag-pendency-of-proceedings","tag-posh-act","tag-sexual-harassment-of-women-at-workplace","tag-sub-inspectors-transfer","tag-transfer-order","tag-victimization"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>[POSH] Sub-Inspector\u2019s transfer, merely on account of pendency of Internal Committee proceedings, unjustified: MP High Court | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"MP High Court quashed the transfer order and held that Sub-Inspector\u2019s transfer, merely on account of pendency of Internal Committee proceedings, unjustified.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/09\/posh-sub-inspectors-transfer-merely-on-account-of-pendency-of-internal-committee-unjustified-mp-high-court-scc-times\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"POSH| Sub-Inspector\u2019s transfer, merely on account of pendency of Internal Committee proceedings, unjustified: MP High Court\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"MP High Court quashed the transfer order and held that Sub-Inspector\u2019s transfer, merely on account of pendency of Internal Committee proceedings, unjustified.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/09\/posh-sub-inspectors-transfer-merely-on-account-of-pendency-of-internal-committee-unjustified-mp-high-court-scc-times\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-09-09T03:30:30+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-09-12T05:31:10+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"591\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"POSH| Sub-Inspector\u2019s transfer, merely on account of pendency of Internal Committee proceedings, unjustified: MP High Court\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/09\/posh-sub-inspectors-transfer-merely-on-account-of-pendency-of-internal-committee-unjustified-mp-high-court-scc-times\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/09\/posh-sub-inspectors-transfer-merely-on-account-of-pendency-of-internal-committee-unjustified-mp-high-court-scc-times\/\",\"name\":\"[POSH] Sub-Inspector\u2019s transfer, merely on account of pendency of Internal Committee proceedings, unjustified: MP High Court | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/09\/posh-sub-inspectors-transfer-merely-on-account-of-pendency-of-internal-committee-unjustified-mp-high-court-scc-times\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/09\/posh-sub-inspectors-transfer-merely-on-account-of-pendency-of-internal-committee-unjustified-mp-high-court-scc-times\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-09-09T03:30:30+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-09-12T05:31:10+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\"},\"description\":\"MP High Court quashed the transfer order and held that Sub-Inspector\u2019s transfer, merely on account of pendency of Internal Committee proceedings, unjustified.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/09\/posh-sub-inspectors-transfer-merely-on-account-of-pendency-of-internal-committee-unjustified-mp-high-court-scc-times\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/09\/posh-sub-inspectors-transfer-merely-on-account-of-pendency-of-internal-committee-unjustified-mp-high-court-scc-times\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/09\/posh-sub-inspectors-transfer-merely-on-account-of-pendency-of-internal-committee-unjustified-mp-high-court-scc-times\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp\",\"width\":887,\"height\":591,\"caption\":\"Madhya Pradesh High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/09\/posh-sub-inspectors-transfer-merely-on-account-of-pendency-of-internal-committee-unjustified-mp-high-court-scc-times\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"POSH| Sub-Inspector\u2019s transfer, merely on account of pendency of Internal Committee proceedings, unjustified: MP High Court\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\",\"name\":\"Ritu\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Ritu\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_7\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"[POSH] Sub-Inspector\u2019s transfer, merely on account of pendency of Internal Committee proceedings, unjustified: MP High Court | SCC Times","description":"MP High Court quashed the transfer order and held that Sub-Inspector\u2019s transfer, merely on account of pendency of Internal Committee proceedings, unjustified.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/09\/posh-sub-inspectors-transfer-merely-on-account-of-pendency-of-internal-committee-unjustified-mp-high-court-scc-times\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"POSH| Sub-Inspector\u2019s transfer, merely on account of pendency of Internal Committee proceedings, unjustified: MP High Court","og_description":"MP High Court quashed the transfer order and held that Sub-Inspector\u2019s transfer, merely on account of pendency of Internal Committee proceedings, unjustified.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/09\/posh-sub-inspectors-transfer-merely-on-account-of-pendency-of-internal-committee-unjustified-mp-high-court-scc-times\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2024-09-09T03:30:30+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-09-12T05:31:10+00:00","og_image":[{"width":887,"height":591,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Ritu","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"POSH| Sub-Inspector\u2019s transfer, merely on account of pendency of Internal Committee proceedings, unjustified: MP High Court","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Ritu","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/09\/posh-sub-inspectors-transfer-merely-on-account-of-pendency-of-internal-committee-unjustified-mp-high-court-scc-times\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/09\/posh-sub-inspectors-transfer-merely-on-account-of-pendency-of-internal-committee-unjustified-mp-high-court-scc-times\/","name":"[POSH] Sub-Inspector\u2019s transfer, merely on account of pendency of Internal Committee proceedings, unjustified: MP High Court | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/09\/posh-sub-inspectors-transfer-merely-on-account-of-pendency-of-internal-committee-unjustified-mp-high-court-scc-times\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/09\/posh-sub-inspectors-transfer-merely-on-account-of-pendency-of-internal-committee-unjustified-mp-high-court-scc-times\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp","datePublished":"2024-09-09T03:30:30+00:00","dateModified":"2024-09-12T05:31:10+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9"},"description":"MP High Court quashed the transfer order and held that Sub-Inspector\u2019s transfer, merely on account of pendency of Internal Committee proceedings, unjustified.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/09\/posh-sub-inspectors-transfer-merely-on-account-of-pendency-of-internal-committee-unjustified-mp-high-court-scc-times\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/09\/posh-sub-inspectors-transfer-merely-on-account-of-pendency-of-internal-committee-unjustified-mp-high-court-scc-times\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/09\/posh-sub-inspectors-transfer-merely-on-account-of-pendency-of-internal-committee-unjustified-mp-high-court-scc-times\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp","width":887,"height":591,"caption":"Madhya Pradesh High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/09\/posh-sub-inspectors-transfer-merely-on-account-of-pendency-of-internal-committee-unjustified-mp-high-court-scc-times\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"POSH| Sub-Inspector\u2019s transfer, merely on account of pendency of Internal Committee proceedings, unjustified: MP High Court"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9","name":"Ritu","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Ritu"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_7\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":335644,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/21\/internal-complaints-settle-sexual-harassment-case-before-starting-inquiry-mp-hc-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":330313,"position":0},"title":"Internal Complaints Committee obligated to attempt Conciliation to settle sexual harassment case before starting inquiry: MP High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"November 21, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe enquiry is nothing but an eye wash because the same was conducted without following any procedure which had to be mandatorily followed.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madhya Pradesh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":369640,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/12\/supreme-court-landmark-posh-act-ruling-icc-jurisdiction-explained\/","url_meta":{"origin":330313,"position":1},"title":"Aggrieved Woman&#8217;s Workplace ICC can Investigate Respondents from Other Departments: Supreme Court&#8217;s Landmark POSH Act Ruling Explained","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"December 12, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court observed that a narrow interpretation of provisions of the POSH Act would beget several procedural and psychological barriers for the aggrieved woman.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"POSH Act ruling","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/POSH-Act-ruling.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/POSH-Act-ruling.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/POSH-Act-ruling.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/POSH-Act-ruling.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":344116,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/21\/kerala-high-court-directs-state-to-formulate-guidelines-for-complainant-anonymity-posh-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":330313,"position":2},"title":"Kerala HC directs State to formulate guidelines for ensuring complainant&#8217;s anonymity from public domain during inquiry under POSH Act","author":"Apoorva","date":"March 21, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"Recognising the right to privacy as one of the fundamental rights of an individual, the Court noted that a complainant raising such grievances is entitled to ensure that her identity and whereabouts are kept anonymised from the public domain.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Kerala High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Kerala-High-Court-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Kerala-High-Court-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Kerala-High-Court-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Kerala-High-Court-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":336749,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/12\/06\/sc-issues-notice-on-pil-for-security-tenure-protection-posh-members\/","url_meta":{"origin":330313,"position":3},"title":"Supreme Court issues notice on PIL for security of tenure &amp; protection to POSH Committee members in private sector","author":"Editor","date":"December 6, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The PIL raised concerns that members of Internal Complaints Committee (ICC) [constituted under Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition, and Redressal) Act, 2013] do not have protection from arbitrary and retaliatory actions such as arbitrary termination at private workplaces.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Hot Off The Press&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Hot Off The Press","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/hot_off_the_press\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Protection of POSH\u2019s ICC members","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/Protection-of-POSHs-ICC-members.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/Protection-of-POSHs-ICC-members.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/Protection-of-POSHs-ICC-members.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/Protection-of-POSHs-ICC-members.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":335254,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/16\/appellate-authority-posh-act-interim-applications-sexual-harassment-karnataka-hc-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":330313,"position":4},"title":"Appellate Authority can consider interim application seeking stay despite absence of any specific provision in POSH Act: Karnataka HC","author":"Sucheta","date":"November 16, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Court explained that POSH Act does not expressly prohibit the Appellate Authority to pass an interim order and once the appellate authority has the power to set aside impugned proceedings, it can be construed that the appellate authority also has implied power to consider passing of interim order of stay\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Karnataka High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Karnataka-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Karnataka-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Karnataka-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Karnataka-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":375166,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/09\/bar-association-not-employer-under-posh-act-ker-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":330313,"position":5},"title":"Bar Association not &#8217;employer&#8217; under POSH Act: Kerala HC sets aside Internal Complaint Committee&#8217;s report on alleged harassment","author":"Sunaina","date":"February 9, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe term \u2018employer\u2019 means someone who exercises control over a workplace in the context of an employment relationship and discharges contractual obligations towards employees.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Bar Association is not employer","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Bar-Association-is-not-employer.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Bar-Association-is-not-employer.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Bar-Association-is-not-employer.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Bar-Association-is-not-employer.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/330313","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67514"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=330313"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/330313\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/317738"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=330313"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=330313"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=330313"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}