{"id":330137,"date":"2024-09-05T17:00:09","date_gmt":"2024-09-05T11:30:09","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=330137"},"modified":"2024-09-06T17:36:13","modified_gmt":"2024-09-06T12:06:13","slug":"implications-of-doj-corporate-whistleblower-awards-pilot-program-on-indian-businesses","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/05\/implications-of-doj-corporate-whistleblower-awards-pilot-program-on-indian-businesses\/","title":{"rendered":"Implications of the DOJ\u2019s Corporate Whistleblower Awards Pilot Program on Indian Businesses"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

INTRODUCTION<\/h4>\n

The United States Department of Justice (DOJ) officially rolled out its Corporate Whistleblower Awards Program (WB Program) on 01-08-20241<\/sup><\/a> It is a three-year pilot program and at the end of the period, the DOJ will evaluate the program\u2019s success.<\/p>\n

The WB Program seeks to reward individuals who provide \u201coriginal information\u201d regarding criminal misconduct that results in a forfeiture exceeding United States Dollar (USD) 1 million in net proceeds, if such information falls in one of four broad subject areas. The DOJ\u2019s Money Laundering and Asset Recovery Section is responsible for the management of the WB Program.<\/p>\n

SCOPE OF THE WB PROGRAM<\/h4>\n

Acknowledging its long history of utilising information derived from whistleblowers to obtain convictions and uncover corporate criminal schemes, the DOJ hopes to \u201cfill the gaps\u201d that other awards programs have left behind2<\/sup><\/a>. With respect to the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, 1977 (FCPA), the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has already implemented a program whereby awards are paid to whistleblowers who provide the Commission with original information pertaining to violations of federal securities laws (SEC Program)3<\/sup><\/a>. However, the ambit of the FCPA is wider in scope and not only covers bribery of foreign officials by \u201cissuers of securities\u201d4<\/sup><\/a> but also violations by \u201cdomestic concerns\u201d5<\/sup><\/a>. Whistleblowers with original information pertaining to violations of the FCPA by domestic concerns will now be able to avail the benefits of the WB Program.<\/p>\n

SALIENT FEATURES OF THE WB PROGRAM<\/h4>\n

OBJECTIVES<\/p>\n

Whistleblowers will have to submit original information pertaining to one of the following four subject matter areas:<\/p>\n

(i) Violations by financial institutions<\/span> including schemes involving money laundering, anti-money laundering compliance violations, and fraud against financial institution regulators;<\/p>\n

(ii) Foreign bribery and corruption by companies<\/span> including violations of the FCPA, the Foreign Extortion Prevention Act, 2023 and violations of money laundering statutes;<\/span><\/p>\n

(iii) Domestic bribery and corruption by companies<\/span>, and<\/p>\n

(iv) Healthcare fraud schemes<\/span>.<\/p>\n

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA<\/p>\n

An individual may be eligible for an award under the WB Program if they, alone or jointly, provide the DOJ with original information in writing that leads to a civil or criminal forfeiture in excess of USD 1 million. However, an individual would be ineligible for an award under the WB Program if:<\/p>\n

    \n
  1. they are a company or any other legal entity;<\/li>\n
  2. they would be eligible for an award under another governmental or statutory whistleblower program for reporting the same information;<\/li>\n
  3. at the time of providing the original information, they are or were an official, employee or contractor of the DOJ or any other law enforcement agency, or a spouse, parent, child or sibling of an official, employee, or contractor of the DOJ. Individuals residing in the same household as an official, employee, or contractor of the DOJ are similarly excluded;<\/li>\n
  4. they are or were an elected or appointed foreign government official at the time of acquiring the original information;<\/li>\n
  5. they meaningfully participated in the criminal activity they reported or knowingly profited from it;<\/li>\n
  6. they acquired the information with the intent to evade any requirement of the WB Program or from an individual who is ineligible as set out above; and<\/li>\n
  7. \n

    they withhold material information, make false, fictitious, or fraudulent statements, or otherwise mislead, interfere with, or obstruct the DOJ\u2019s investigation.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    WHAT QUALIFIES AS \u201cORIGINAL INFORMATION\u201d?<\/p>\n

    In addition to the eligibility criteria set, the information provided by the whistleblower must be original. The information must be based on or derived from an individual\u2019s independent analysis and\/or knowledge and cannot be information that is publicly available or generally known. The DOJ will also examine whether the information materially adds to the information it already possesses.<\/p>\n

    The following types of information are not considered \u201coriginal information\u201d:<\/p>\n

      \n
    1. information obtained that was subject to attorney-client privilege, unless such information can be lawfully disclosed under the crime-fraud or other such exceptions;<\/li>\n
    2. information obtained in connection with legal representation or services being provided to a client either as an individual or as an employee or member of a firm;<\/li>\n
    3. information that is contained entirely in an allegation made in a governmental report, judicial hearing, audit, investigation, or news report. However, where the individual submitting the information is the source based on which the above allegation is made, the information will be considered \u201coriginal information\u201d;<\/li>\n
    4. information obtained as a result of being:\n

      (1) an officer, director, trustee or partner of an entity who obtained the information from another person or learnt of it through internal reporting processes;<\/p>\n

      (2) an employee involved in compliance or internal audit capacities;<\/p>\n

      (3) employed by or otherwise associated with a firm retained to conduct an inquiry or investigation in relation to the possible legal violations; and<\/p>\n

      (4) an employee of or other person associated with a public accounting firm. However, these exclusions would not apply if an individual had a reasonable basis to believe that the disclosure of information to the DOJ is necessary to prevent criminal conduct that could harm national security, result in crimes of violence, cause imminent financial or physical harm to others, or impede an investigation into such conduct. Similarly, if 120 days have passed since individuals mentioned in (1) and (2) had provided the information to an entity\u2019s Audit Committee, Chief Legal Officer, Chief Compliance Officer (their equivalents), or their supervisor, then their information would be considered \u201coriginal\u201d<\/span>; and<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

    5. \n

      information obtained with the knowledge that it was obtained in violation of applicable laws.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

      ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS<\/p>\n

      Voluntary, truthful, and complete<\/p>\n

      A submission must be voluntary, truthful, and complete<\/span>. For information to be considered voluntary, it must be submitted before any demand, inquiry or request from the DOJ and must not be submitted in pursuance of an obligation under an agreement with the DOJ or other law enforcement agency. Additionally, details including an individual\u2019s own participation in any misconduct must also be disclosed. Information submitted by an individual who lies about, conceals, or mischaracterises their role in relation to the misconduct being reported would not be considered truthful and complete.<\/p>\n

      Cooperation<\/p>\n

      Whistleblowers submitting information must cooperate with the DOJ in its investigation. This includes providing evidence before a jury during court proceedings, producing documents, and working under the supervision of law enforcement officials.<\/p>\n

      PROTECTIONS FOR WHISTLEBLOWERS<\/p>\n

      The DOJ guarantees confidentiality of all information submitted to it that could result in the identity of the whistleblower being disclosed. This, however, is subject to the disclosure of information required under law or the DOJ\u2019s policies. Accordingly, the DOJ is empowered to share information provided by a whistleblower with other law enforcement agencies that uphold the same confidentiality commitments. Under the WB Program, whistleblowers may also submit their information anonymously through an attorney. However, prior to the payment of any award, whistleblowers are required to disclose their identity to the DOJ and have it verified.<\/p>\n

      KEY TAKEAWAYS FOR INDIAN BUSINESSES<\/h4>\n

      DISCRETIONARY AWARDS<\/p>\n

      The WB Program explicitly sets out that all awards are discretionary even if all other requisite criteria are fulfilled. Further, the WB Program specifically stipulates that the DOJ\u2019s award determination is neither appealable nor subject to judicial review. This is a marked departure from the SEC Program, wherein a determination of whether or to whom to make an award may be appealed within 30 days after the SEC issues its final decision to the United States Courts of Appeals.<\/p>\n

      EMPHASIS ON TIMELY INTERNAL REPORTING<\/p>\n

      The WB Program has been criticised for incentivising whistleblowers to report possible breaches of the FCPA to the DOJ first, instead of allowing companies to receive the information first and voluntarily self-disclose. However, it is pertinent to note that one of the factors that the DOJ will consider when evaluating a potential award is whether the whistleblower participated in internal compliance systems or internal reporting first. In line with this, the DOJ has also simultaneously announced a temporary amendment to its Criminal Division Corporate Enforcement and Self-Disclosure Policy. In situations where a whistleblower has made both an internal report to a company and a submission to the WB Program, the company will still stand to qualify for a presumption of a declination as long as the company:<\/p>\n

      (i)<\/span> self-reports the conduct to the DOJ within 120 days after receiving the whistleblower\u2019s internal report; and<\/p>\n

      (ii)<\/span> meets the other requirements for voluntary self-disclosure and presumption of declination.<\/p>\n

      CREATION OF ROBUST COMPLIANCE PROGRAMS<\/p>\n

      Violations of the FCPA by domestic concerns, which were not previously covered under any federal whistleblower programs, are now covered under the WB Program. This has a significant impact on the conduct of Indian subsidiaries of US-based domestic concerns as they are now under the ambit of the WB Program and are incentivised to submit information on possible breaches of the FCPA to the DOJ. It is thus essential for such US-based domestic concerns to ensure that their subsidiaries establish and implement robust compliance programs to prevent misconduct in the first place.<\/p>\n

      CONCLUSION<\/h4>\n

      While the impact of the WB Program remains to be seen, it is likely that the DOJ and companies will see an increase in whistleblower complaints. Given this, it is imperative that Indian companies continue to evaluate and strengthen their internal compliance and reporting systems. Indian companies should also consider creating detailed investigative processes to ensure any allegations are expeditiously and thoroughly investigated, preferably within a 120-day timeframe to ensure that in the event a self-disclosure is required to be made, it is as detailed as possible.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

      \n

      *Partner, Khaitan & Co.<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n

      **Principal Associate, Khaitan & Co.<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n

      ***Associate, Khaitan & Co.
      \n<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n

      1.<\/a> dl (justice.gov)<\/a>.<\/p>\n

      2.<\/a> Office of Public Affairs | Deputy Attorney General Lisa Monaco Delivers Remarks on New Corporate Whistleblower Awards Pilot Program | United States Department of Justice<\/a>.<\/p>\n

      3.<\/a> SEC.gov | Whistleblower Program<\/a>.<\/p>\n

      4.<\/a> \u201cIssuer\u201d means every person who issues or proposes to issue any security. For the purposes of the FCPA, \u201cissuer\u201d primarily refers to any company that has securities registered in the US or is otherwise required to file periodic reports with the SEC.<\/p>\n

      5.<\/a> \u201cDomestic Concern\u201d means any individual who is a citizen, national or resident of the United States and any corporation, partnership, association, joint-stock company, business trust, unincorporated organization, or sole proprietorship which has its principal place of business in the United States, or which is organized under the laws of a State of the United States or a territory, possession, or commonwealth of the United States.<\/p>\n

      *Disclaimer: Authors are Indian qualified lawyers and only entitled to practice law in India.<\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

      By Avik Biswas* , Rithika Reddy** and Animay Singh***<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":330177,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[20271,47404],"tags":[72817,72816,42871,72821,72822,72819,72818,50111,72820],"class_list":["post-330137","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-experts_corner","category-khaitan-co","tag-corporate-whistleblower","tag-corporate-whistleblower-awards-pilot-program","tag-department-of-justice","tag-foreign-corrupt-practices","tag-foreign-extortion-prevention-act","tag-indian-businesses","tag-pilot-program","tag-securities-and-exchange-commission","tag-united-states-department-of-justice"],"yoast_head":"\nImplications of the DOJ\u2019s Corporate Whistleblower Awards Pilot Program on Indian Businesses | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Khaitan and Co. team discussed the Implications of the DOJ\u2019s Corporate Whistleblower Awards Pilot Program on Indian Businesses\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/05\/implications-of-doj-corporate-whistleblower-awards-pilot-program-on-indian-businesses\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Implications of the DOJ\u2019s Corporate Whistleblower Awards Pilot Program on Indian Businesses\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Khaitan and Co. team discussed the Implications of the DOJ\u2019s Corporate Whistleblower Awards Pilot Program on Indian Businesses\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/05\/implications-of-doj-corporate-whistleblower-awards-pilot-program-on-indian-businesses\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-09-05T11:30:09+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-09-06T12:06:13+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/EXPERT-54.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Implications of the DOJ\u2019s Corporate Whistleblower Awards Pilot Program on Indian Businesses\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/05\/implications-of-doj-corporate-whistleblower-awards-pilot-program-on-indian-businesses\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/05\/implications-of-doj-corporate-whistleblower-awards-pilot-program-on-indian-businesses\/\",\"name\":\"Implications of the DOJ\u2019s Corporate Whistleblower Awards Pilot Program on Indian Businesses | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/05\/implications-of-doj-corporate-whistleblower-awards-pilot-program-on-indian-businesses\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/05\/implications-of-doj-corporate-whistleblower-awards-pilot-program-on-indian-businesses\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/EXPERT-54.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-09-05T11:30:09+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-09-06T12:06:13+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"description\":\"Khaitan and Co. team discussed the Implications of the DOJ\u2019s Corporate Whistleblower Awards Pilot Program on Indian Businesses\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/05\/implications-of-doj-corporate-whistleblower-awards-pilot-program-on-indian-businesses\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/05\/implications-of-doj-corporate-whistleblower-awards-pilot-program-on-indian-businesses\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/05\/implications-of-doj-corporate-whistleblower-awards-pilot-program-on-indian-businesses\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/EXPERT-54.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/EXPERT-54.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"Corporate Whistleblower Awards Pilot Program\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/05\/implications-of-doj-corporate-whistleblower-awards-pilot-program-on-indian-businesses\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Implications of the DOJ\u2019s Corporate Whistleblower Awards Pilot Program on Indian Businesses\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Implications of the DOJ\u2019s Corporate Whistleblower Awards Pilot Program on Indian Businesses | SCC Times","description":"Khaitan and Co. team discussed the Implications of the DOJ\u2019s Corporate Whistleblower Awards Pilot Program on Indian Businesses","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/05\/implications-of-doj-corporate-whistleblower-awards-pilot-program-on-indian-businesses\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Implications of the DOJ\u2019s Corporate Whistleblower Awards Pilot Program on Indian Businesses","og_description":"Khaitan and Co. team discussed the Implications of the DOJ\u2019s Corporate Whistleblower Awards Pilot Program on Indian Businesses","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/05\/implications-of-doj-corporate-whistleblower-awards-pilot-program-on-indian-businesses\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2024-09-05T11:30:09+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-09-06T12:06:13+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/EXPERT-54.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Implications of the DOJ\u2019s Corporate Whistleblower Awards Pilot Program on Indian Businesses","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"8 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/05\/implications-of-doj-corporate-whistleblower-awards-pilot-program-on-indian-businesses\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/05\/implications-of-doj-corporate-whistleblower-awards-pilot-program-on-indian-businesses\/","name":"Implications of the DOJ\u2019s Corporate Whistleblower Awards Pilot Program on Indian Businesses | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/05\/implications-of-doj-corporate-whistleblower-awards-pilot-program-on-indian-businesses\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/05\/implications-of-doj-corporate-whistleblower-awards-pilot-program-on-indian-businesses\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/EXPERT-54.webp","datePublished":"2024-09-05T11:30:09+00:00","dateModified":"2024-09-06T12:06:13+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"description":"Khaitan and Co. team discussed the Implications of the DOJ\u2019s Corporate Whistleblower Awards Pilot Program on Indian Businesses","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/05\/implications-of-doj-corporate-whistleblower-awards-pilot-program-on-indian-businesses\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/05\/implications-of-doj-corporate-whistleblower-awards-pilot-program-on-indian-businesses\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/05\/implications-of-doj-corporate-whistleblower-awards-pilot-program-on-indian-businesses\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/EXPERT-54.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/EXPERT-54.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"Corporate Whistleblower Awards Pilot Program"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/05\/implications-of-doj-corporate-whistleblower-awards-pilot-program-on-indian-businesses\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Implications of the DOJ\u2019s Corporate Whistleblower Awards Pilot Program on Indian Businesses"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/EXPERT-54.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":266232,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/30\/croatia-whistleblower-protection-act-comes-into-force\/","url_meta":{"origin":330137,"position":0},"title":"Croatia | Whistleblower Protection Act comes into force","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"April 30, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"On 23rd April, 2022 the new Croatia Whistleblower Law came into force. The aim of the law is to protect the whistleblowers by providing convenient and reliable ways of reporting irregularities. Back in 2019 this Act transposes into Croatian Legislation \u00a0Directive European Union (EU) on the protection of persons who\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Foreign Legislation"","block_context":{"text":"Foreign Legislation","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/legislationupdates\/foreign\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-208.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-208.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-208.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-208.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-208.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":192374,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/02\/26\/individuals-not-reporting-companys-legal-violations-cannot-claim-protection-dodd-frank-reforms-anti-retaliation-provisions\/","url_meta":{"origin":330137,"position":1},"title":"Individuals not reporting a company\u2019s legal violations, cannot claim protection under the Dodd-Frank Reform\u2019s anti-retaliation provisions","author":"Saba","date":"February 26, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court of the United States: While deciding the issue that whether the 2010 Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, covers the protection of an individual who has not reported a violation of the securities law to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), and whether such individual comes\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Supreme Court of The United States","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/supreme_court_of_US.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/supreme_court_of_US.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/supreme_court_of_US.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/supreme_court_of_US.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/supreme_court_of_US.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":340209,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/01\/corporate-whistleblowing-are-we-there-yet\/","url_meta":{"origin":330137,"position":2},"title":"Corporate Whistleblowing: Are We There Yet?","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"February 1, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"by Prachi Dutta*","rel":"","context":"In "Op Eds"","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Corporate Whistleblowing","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/Corporate-Whistleblowing.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/Corporate-Whistleblowing.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/Corporate-Whistleblowing.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/Corporate-Whistleblowing.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":219225,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/07\/whistleblowing-in-india-the-way-forward\/","url_meta":{"origin":330137,"position":3},"title":"Whistleblowing in India: The Way Forward","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 7, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Bhumesh Verma, Managing Partner and Abhisar Vidyarthi, Student Researcher, Corp Comm Legal Cite as: (2019) PL (CL) September 84","rel":"","context":"In "OP. ED."","block_context":{"text":"OP. ED.","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/03\/Corp-Comm-Legal-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/03\/Corp-Comm-Legal-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/03\/Corp-Comm-Legal-1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/03\/Corp-Comm-Legal-1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/03\/Corp-Comm-Legal-1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":256664,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/02\/related-party-transactions\/","url_meta":{"origin":330137,"position":4},"title":"Related Party Transactions and Corporate Governance in India","author":"Editor","date":"November 2, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"by Letishiya Chaturvedi* and Poorna Dixit**","rel":"","context":"In "Op Eds"","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image-113-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image-113-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image-113-1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image-113-1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image-113-1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":270937,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/01\/scotus-maine-department-of-educations-non-sectarian-requirement-for-tuition-assistance-payments-is-violative-of-us-constitutions-first-amendment\/","url_meta":{"origin":330137,"position":5},"title":"SCOTUS| Maine Department of Education\u2019s \u2018non-sectarian requirement\u2019 for tuition assistance payments, is violative of US Constitution\u2019s First Amendment","author":"Editor","date":"August 1, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court of The United States (SCOTUS): While deciding the instant petition wherein the Maine Department of Education (hereinafter the Department) was sued for instituting a requisite for schools to be \u201cnonsectarian\u201d in order to be eligible for tuition assistance; the SCOTUS, with a ratio of 6: 3 held that\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Supreme Court of The United States","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/supreme_court_of_US.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/supreme_court_of_US.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/supreme_court_of_US.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/supreme_court_of_US.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/supreme_court_of_US.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/330137","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=330137"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/330137\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/330177"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=330137"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=330137"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=330137"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}